ABSTRACT
This study evaluated the effects of different disinfectants on bacterial isolates from hospital formites. The result showed bacteria flora covering eight species including E. coli, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Micrococcus, Proteus, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, and Enterococcus spp. The activity of the three test disinfectants against the hospital formites bacterial isolate at varying concentration indicates that all the disinfectants were active against each of the isolate at full strength (100% concentration) but showed varieties in their respective activity at diluted concentrations. Izal was effective at minimum concentration of 12.5% (v/v) against E. coli, Staphylococcus, Proteus, and Klebsiella. While it minimum inhibition concentration recorded 25% (quarter strength) against Enterococcus, Streptococcus and Pseudomonas. Dettol did not record any activity at concentration of 6.25% and 12.5% but showed inhibition at the minimum concentration of 25% for E. coli, Enterococcus and Klebsiella and at 50% for proteus, pseudomonas and micrococcus. Ivy was active at 12% concentration against Pseudomonas, Micrococcus and klebsiella and at 25% concentration against E. coli, Enterococcus, Streptococcus and Proteus. Therefore, the result show that the performance of the test disinfectants against the hospital formites bacteria isolates was in the order of potency, Izal ˃ Ivy ˃ Dettol. In general, the minimum concentration of the disinfectants that cause inhibition of the bacteria isolates was 12.5% (v/v) for izal and ivy and 25% for dettol. it was concluded that inanimate objects in hospital environment habor a wide range of bacteria species some of which are pathogenic or potentially pathogenic. This work recommends that the used of this common and popular disinfectant should be encouraged in homes and public places especially in the hospitals.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page i
Certification ii
Dedication iii
Acknowledgement iv
Table of Contents v
List of Tables vii
Abstract viii
CHAPTER
ONE
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Aims and Objectives 3
CHAPTER
TWO
2.0 Literature
Review 4
2.1 Studies
on the In Vitro Activity of Five Disinfectants Against
Nosocomial Bacteria 4
2.2 Comparative
Efficacy of Selected Disinfectants against Pathogenic
Bacteria Isolated From Hospital
Fomites and Disposal Wastes 7
2.3 Study
of Antimicrobial Effects of Some Disinfectants on Bacteria
Isolated From the Operating Theatre
of Usmanu Danfodiyo University
Teaching Hospital
Sokoto, Nigeria 9
2.4 Bacterial Contaminants
Associated With Hospital Formites 11
2.4.1 Escherichia coli 11
2.4.2 Salmonella typhi 11
2.4.3 Staphylococcus aureus 12
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 Materials and Method 13
3.1 Sample Collection 13
3.2 Sterilization of Materials 13
3.3 Materials and Media Used 13
3.4 Media Preparation 13
3.5 Inoculation and Isolation 14
3.6 Purification
of Isolates 14
3.7 Identification of the
Isolates 14
3.8 Gram
Staining 14
3.9 Biochemical Test 15
3.9.1 Catalase Test 15
3.9.2 Indole Test 15
3.9.3 Citrate Utilization Test 16
3.9.4 Hydrogen
Sulphide (H2S) Production Test 16
3.9.5 Starch Hydrolysis 16
3.9.6 Motility,
Indole, Urease (MIU) 17
3.9.7 Coagulase Test 17
3.9.8 Oxidase Test 18
3.10 Comparative
Efficacy of Selected Disinfectants on Isolated
Pathogenic Bacteria 18
3.10.1 Disinfectant Dilution Method 18
3.10.2 Agar Diffusion Method 18
3.10.3 Minimum Inhibitory Concentration
(MIC) 18
CHAPTER
FOUR
4.0 Results 21
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 Discussion,
Conclusion and Recommendation 26
5.1 Discussion 26
5.2 Conclusion 27
5.3 Recommendation 27
LIST
OF TABLES
TABLE
|
TITLE
|
PAGE
|
4.1
|
Morphological identification,
Biochemical Identification, Gram Reaction and Sugar Utilization Profile of
the bacterial isolates from the hospital formites
|
21
|
4.1
|
Occurrences Of Bacteria Isolates
From Formites In Three Test Hospitals
|
23
|
4.2
|
Antimicrobial
Activity of Disinfectants against Bacteria Isolates of Hospital Formites
|
25
|
4.3
|
Minimum Inhibitory Activity of the
three Test Disinfectants against the Hospital Formites Bacteria Isolate at
Varying Concentration
|
27
|
CHAPTER ONE
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Disinfection procedures represent the main
type of intervention in hospital settings against pathogenic or potentially
pathogenic microorganisms (Lineback et
al., 2018) and aim to prevent or reduce complications due to infectious
organisms. Surface contamination, in particular, is a public health problem, as
healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) represent a significant cause of
morbidity and mortality worldwide. HAIs develop during hospitalization and a
range of different microorganisms are frequently isolate Including
multidrug-resistant bacteria, such as vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), Clostridium
difficile, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp. and methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (Vickery
et al., 2012). In particular, S. aureus and P. aeruginosa are hazardous microorganisms, able to grow on hard
non-porous surfaces (e.g., metal pipes and floor drains) and develop biofilms
that protect them from adverse conditions (Jamal et al., 2017). Their resistance to various antimicrobial substances
can compromise patients’ therapeutic protocol, increasing the need to improve
disinfection procedures in healthcare settings (Laxminarayan et al., 2013).
There are
multiple factors contributing to the spread of HAIs, which include
healthcare-associated factors (invasive device use, surgical procedures,
inappropriate use of antimicrobial therapy), environmental factors
(contaminated air-conditioning systems) and patient-related factors (severity
of underlying illnesses, use of immunosuppressive agents, prolonged hospital
stays) (Al-Tawfiq and Tambyah, 2014).
Nosocomial,
or hospital-acquired infections, are defined by the US Center for Disease
Control and Prevention as any localized or systemic condition that occurs in a
patient as a result of the presence of an infectious agent or its toxin that
was not present or incubating at the time of hospital admission (Horan et al., 2008). It has been seen that
immune compromised patients are at a threat of nosocomial infections (NI’s)
when they undergo surgery or have any underlying disease, and they are even
worse affected when admitted in Intensive Care Unit, as the rate of NI’s is
almost three times higher than any other departments of the hospital (Divya et al., 2015) To minimize the percentage
of patients who acquire NI, several actions such as cleaning, washing and
disinfecting hands and the use of isolation material are performed by
health-care workers and these actions are called Infection Control Measures.
Different types of infections acquired in hospitals include bloodstream
infections, surgical wound infections, ventilator associated pneumonia, urinary
tract infection, lower respiratory infection, gastrointestinal, skin, soft
tissue, ear, nose and throat infections. Although viruses, fungi and parasites
are also recognized as sources of nosocomial infections, bacterial agents
remain the most commonly recognized cause. In hospitals, inanimate surfaces and
equipment like bedrails, door handles, drip stand, medical charts,
stethoscopes, ultrasound machine may be contaminated by bacteria. The agents
that are usually involved in hospital-acquired infections include Streptococcus
sp., Acinetobacter sp., Enterococci, Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, coagulase negative Staphylococci, Staphylococcus
aureus, Bacillus cereus, Legionella and Enterobacteriaceae
family members, namely, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae,
Escherichia coli and Serratia marcescens. Out of these Enterococci,
P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and E. coli have a major role
(Horan et al., 2008). Microorganisms causing nosocomial infection
are transmitted in hospitals by several routes including direct or
indirect contact, droplet spread, common vehicles like air and vector
borne and alternative vehicles, such as blood plasma or food. The
effective cleaning and disinfection of inanimate contact surfaces is
therefore critical for the prevention and control of nosocomial
infections within the health-care environment. Biocides such as
antiseptics and disinfectants are widely used as an initial step to
control or kill infectious agents from possibly contaminated equipment
and specimens.
The effective use of disinfectants is an
important factor in preventing nosocomial infections. However, the resistance
of pathogens to disinfectants is an emerging problem and is due to the presence
of integrons, super integrons, efflux mechanisms and genetic adaptations in the
pathogens (Khan et al., 2017). So, in
spite of regular use of conventional disinfectants, surfaces and medical equipment
are usually not effectively decontaminated and disinfected. There is a need to
evaluate the efficacy of disinfectants which are commonly used in our hospitals
and to look for newer and better options to disinfect the inanimate surfaces
and hospital environments.
1.2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to investigate the
efficacy of three (3) commercially available disinfectants on bacterial
isolates from clinical samples and to create awareness for health workers to
choose an effective disinfectant.
The objectives are;
1.
To isolate and characterize bacterial isolates associated with clinical
samples
2.
To determine the antibacterial activity of the different commercially
available disinfectants against the bacterial isolates from clinical samples.
3.
To determine the minimum inhibitory
concentration of the various disinfectants on some selected isolates from the
clinical samples
Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects
FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!
+(234) 0814 780 1594
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment