ABSTRACT
Antiseptics and Disinfectants are chemicals used extensively in hospitals, other health care centres and in homes to control the growth of microorganisms on living tissues and inanimate objects respectively. This study compared the efficacy of two disinfectants (HYPO and Ivy) and two antiseptics (Iodine and Carex sanitizer) against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa .The disk diffusion method and Rideal Walker Phenol coefficient test were used. For the antiseptics , Staphylococcus aureus was susceptible to Iodine(18) and was not susceptible to Carex sanitizer. For the test disinfectants, Staphylococcus aureus was less susceptible to Ivy (24) and more susceptible Hypo . For the antiseptics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, it was more susceptible to Iodine and less susceptible to Carex sanitizer. The disinfectants against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was more susceptible to Hypo and was resistant to Ivy. The phenol coefficient of the test antiseptics against Staphylococcus aureus ranged from 5-6 . Carex sanitizer had the highest with 6. While Iodine had the least with 5.for the test disinfectants the phenol coefficient ranged from 6-7. Ivy had the least with 6 while Hypo had the highest with 7.For Pseudomonas aeruginosa , the phenol coefficient of the test antiseptics ranged from 5.3 to 6.3.Iodine had the least with 5.3 while Carex sanitizer had the highest with 6.3.For the test disinfectants, the phenol coefficient was 7.4 for both Hypo and Ivy. Thus for the phenol coefficient test, all the disinfectants and antiseptics showed strong bactericidal effect against the organisms. While for the disk diffusion, the result showed that Hypo had the strongest bactericidal effect while Carex sanitizer had the least bactericidal effect .The study concluded that Hypo should be used in our daily disinfection.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page i
Certification ii
Dedication iii
Acknowledgements iv
Table of Contents v
List of Tables vi
List of Figures vii
List of Plates viii
Abstract ix
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Aims and Objectives 4
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 Literature Review 5
2.1 History of Disinfectants 6
2.2 Disinfectants and antiseptics 6
2.3 Types of Disinfectants 7
2.4 Sources of contamination
13
2.5 Properties of A Disinfectant 13
2.6 General Features of Disinfectant 13
2,7 Factors influencing the efficacy of
disinfectants and antiseptics
14
2.8 Neutralizers
15
2.9 General Features of the Test Organisms 15
2.10 Mechanism of Actions of Disinfectants
against Bacteria 16
2.11 Resistant Action of Bacteria 16
2.12Pseudomonas sensitivity to antimicromial
agents
17
2.13Staphylococcus sensitivity to
antimicromial agents 17
2.14 Advantages and Disadvantages of
Disinfectants 17
2.15 General Guidelines in the Use of
Disinfectants 18
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 Material and Method 20
3.1 Collection of samples 20
3.2 Collection of test Organisms 20
3.3 Rideal Walker phenol coefficient test 20
3.4 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing 20
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 RESULTS 22
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 Discussion 39
5.1 Conclusion 42
5.2 Recommendations 41
References
List
of Tables
Table Title
Page
1 Results of the diameter of zone of
inhibition of Test disinfectants on Staphylococcus aureus 23
2
Results of the diameter of zone of inhibition of the test disinfectants on Pseudomonas
aeruginosa. 24
3 Bactericidal efficiency of phenol against
staphylococcus aureus 27
4
Bactercidal efficacy of Ivy against Staphylococcus
aureus 28
5
Bactericidal efficacy of Hypo against staphylococcus aureus 29
6
Bactericidal efficacy of iodine against Staphylococcus aureus
30
7 Bactericidal
efficacy of Sanitizer against Staphyloccusaureus 31
8 Phenol
Coefficient of Test Disinfectant 32
9Bactericidal efficiency of phenol against Pseudomonas aeruginosa 33
10Bactericidal
efficacy of Ivy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa 34
11. Bactericidal
efficacy of Hypo against Pseudomonas
aeruginosa 35
12 Bactericidal efficacy
of Iodine against Pseudomonas aeruginosa 36
13 Bactericidal efficacy of Sanitizer against Pseudomonas aeruginosa 37
14 Phenol coefficient of
disinfectants 38
List of
Figures
Fig Title
Page
1. Staphylococcus responseto test
disinfectants and antiseptics 25
2. Pseudomonas aeruginosa response to test
disinfectants and antiseptics 26
CHAPTER ONE
1.0. Introduction
Disinfectants
are substances that are applied to inanimate surfaces and objects to destroy
harmful microorganisms, although they may not kill bacteria spores, and they
are categorized by their spectrum of microbial activity. According to (Kennedy
and Bek,1998).They are chemicals used to inhibit or prevent the growth of
microorganisms on inanimate objects usually disinfectants are “cidal” in action
in that they kill susceptible potential pathogenic microbes.Disinfectants used
in hospitals, industries, laboratories and in the homes must be tested
periodically to ascertain their potency validation which is defined as
establishing documented evidence that a disinfection process willconsistently
remove or inactivate known or possible pathogens from inanimate objects (Sridhar,
2012).Disinfectants are used extensively in the
homes, healthcare settings, laboratories and industries for a variety of
topical and hard surface application particularly as an essential component of
infection control practice and aids in prevention of other infections (
Guimaraeset al,2000).Although
microbiologists have been working for more than a century on the
problems
associated with disinfection, understanding of the mode of action of active molecules
remains vague: numerous hypotheses exist but few certainties. Many authorshave
long maintained that disinfectants and antiseptics act in a non-specific
manner, incontrast to antibiotics which have distinct cellular targets within
the microorganism.Although many studies still need to be performed in this
field, it is clear that thisdistinction cannot be made for some molecules.The
term control of microorganisms refers to the reduction in number or activity of
the total microbial food. The reason for controlling microorganisms are as
follows to prevent contamination by the growth of undesirable microorganism, to
prevent deterioration and spoilage of materials by microorganisms (Pelezaret al 2006).Microorganisms are minute
living things that are two small to be seen with the unaided eyes (Tortoraet al, 2007) Before the discovery of
microorganisms, thousands of people died in devasting epidemics,this pushed
scientist to seek how to control microbial growth (Johnson and Case, 1995).some
examples of microbes are bacteria, fungi, viruses and protozoa (Tortoraet al, 2007).
In
the mid-1800s, the Hungarian physicians IgnazSemmeliveis and English
Physicians Joseph Lister used these thoughts to develop some of the first
microbial control practices for medical procedures. Some practices that have
been employed in the control of microbes is hand washing. Chloride of lime and
use of techniques (Hamamah, 2004).Scientists have fought tirelessly to develop
a variety of methods to control microbial growth this includes physical and
chemical methods.The control directed at destroying harmful microorganisms is
called Disinfection. It refers to the destruction of vegetative pathogens. When
the treatment is directed at living tissues, it is called Antisepsis (Ryan and
Ray, 2004).The categorization of commercially available detergents into
disinfectants and antiseptics as been ergonomically crucial in determining
antimicrobial, antifungal and antiinflammatory propensities and efficiency
across a wide spectrum of pathogenic and saprophytic microorganisms (Tiralet al, 2013).Antiseptics and
disinfectants have been found useful in many hospitals, clinics, homes and
laboratories either as chemical agents to disinfect inanimate objects like
cleaning of floors, disinfection of water and surgical instruments (Onaolapo,
2001).
Disinfectants are toxic not only for
microbial pathogens but for host cells as well and because of this, they can
only be used to inactivate microorganisms in the inanimate environment or to a
limited extent, on skin surfaces but cannot be administered systemically (WHO,
2003).The mode of action of disinfectants is though to be liked to destruction
of proteins, lipids or nucleic acids .In the cells or its cytoplasmic membrane,
although microorganisms differ in their sensitivity to chemical germicide (Tortoraet al, 2004).Disinfectants can be
divided into alkylating, Sulfhydryl combining,oxidizing, dehydrating and
permeable (larson and Morton, 1991).It is established that disinfectant and
antiseptic antimicrobial products contain, as reported, approximately 300
different active ingredients and are marketed in a myriad of formulations,
including sprays, liquids,gels, concentrated powders(Rutalaet al, 2000).It is restinated that consumers both domestic and
international spread alot of money each year in a variety of disinfectants and
antiseptics products. (Lim and Ting, 2012).Many consumers actually wonder about
the products, they purchase and whether
the products are safe and effective (Entoyen and Tollen, 2005).
Pseudomonas aeruginosais
an important opportunistic pathology, it is one of the causes of nosocomial
infection in immunodeficient patients (Lycsaket al, 2000).
Infections
by this microorganism is very difficult to treat because of its virulence,
intrinsic and acquired antibiotic resistance. This limit the choice for
effective antimicrobial agents ( Zavasckiet
al, 2005).
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
is studied for its high incidence and extraordinary potential to form biofilms
in clinical equipment, medical devices and wounds (Hill et al, 2010).
Staphylococcus aureus
occur in 40 - 50% of humans.In this study the efficacy of some disinfectants
and antiseptics on Pseudomonas aeruginisa
and Staphylococcus aureus is studied.
1.2. Aims and objectives
To
find out the concentration of disinfectants that will be effective in Gram
position Staphylococcus aureus and
Gram negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
To
investigate the difference of sterilizing pathern
To
compare the efficacy of the different test disinfectants on the test organisms.
Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects
FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!
+(234) 0814 780 1594
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment