The Language of the Military in Parade is usually forceful
no doubt. However, this study investigates the aspect of ideology vis-à-vis
dominance in the language. The study uses the framework of Critical Discourse
Analysis henceforth CDA. The researcher is of the opinion that the language of
the military in parade is laced with ideological prejudices of the Military
institution and asymmetric power relation of the institution. The data collected for the study have been
extracted from a purposive video record of 2016 passing out Parade of the
Nigerian Military School; Zaria which was obtained in a CD from the archive of
the school. Using Fairclaugh 1989 three-dimensional model of CDA analysis as a
framework, the data was analyzed based on the following grammatical Units:
Morpheme, Word/Jargon, Phrase and clause/sentence. The researcher finds out
that, certain linguistic tools are employed to entrench the ideological
prejudices and asymmetric power relation in the Military institution. The study
concludes that Military parade discourse is a verbal or rather a linguistic
representation of the Military ideology, values, culture, tradition and
dominance. Thus, in every instance of language use in the Military parade,
there exist elements of ideology vis-à-vis dominance.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
Page........................................ i
Declaration................................................................... ii
Certification................................................................ iii ........................................................................................
Dedication................................................................... iv
Acknowledgements...................................................... v
Abstract...................................................................... vii
CHAPTER ONE:
Introduction
1.0 Background to the Study …………………………... `1-4
1.1 Statement of the Research Problem……….4-5
1.2 Research Questions…………………………6
1.3 Aim and Objectives…………………………6
1.4 Scope and Delimitation of the Study …………………...7
1.5 Justification for the Study……….………..7-9
CHAPTER TWO:
Review of Related Literature and Theoretical Framework
2.0 Preamble……………………………………9
2.1 Topical review……………….9
2.1.1Discourse………………………………… 9- 16
2.1.2An overview of CDA………………………………… 17-22
2.1.3An approaches to CDA…………………………………. 22-33
2. 1.4Principles of CDA………………………………… 33-34
2.2Languageand Power …...……………………………...34-43
2.3 Language and Ideology……………………………………………43-48
2.4 An overview of Military Language…………………………………48-64
2.5 Review of Previous Studies………………………………………… 65-71
2.6Theoretical Framework……………………………… 71-75
CHAPTER THREE: Methodology
3.0 Preamble…………………………………………… 76
3.1 Method of Data Collection………………………………...76
3. Sources of Data Collection…………………………… 76-77
3.2 Sampling Procedure…………………………………… 77
3.3 Analytical Procedure………………………………… 77-78
CHAPTER FOUR: Data Presentation and Analysis
4.0 Preamble…………………………………………. 79
4.1 Data and Presentation…………………………………………...80
4.1.1 Morpheme………………………………………… 80-82
4.1.2 Word/Jargon ………………………………… 83-88
4.1.3 Phrase………………………………………………...89-96
4.1.4 Sentence…………………………………………………. 97-110
4.4Findings/Discussion ……………………………………111-113
CHAPTER FIVE: Summary, Conclusion and Suggestions for
Further Studies
5.0 Preamble………………………………………………………………...114-114
5.1 Summary ………………………………………………… 114-115
5.2. Conclusion………………………………………………. 115
5.3 Suggestions for Further Studies…………………………. 116
REFERENCES………………………………………………. 117-122
Appendix…………………………………………………...... 121
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.0 Background to the Study
This study is a Critical Discourse Analysis of
military parade discourse at the Nigerian Military school, Zaria. The study
uses the framework of Critical Discourse Analysis henceforth, CDA. The Military
is recognized worldwide as an integral part of every nation because the
institution protects countries from external attack. Military institution shares
a common feature wherever they exist, which is discipline and absolute loyalty
to the last command. It is a command society where power is sublet from top to
bottom and such power is subject to abuse but procedures are uniformed, ordered
and precise for combat effectiveness. It
is a rigidly stratified society where rank is defined (Brotz and Wilson 1946 in
Abaya 2008). These features are reflected or rather enacted verbally in almost
all activities of the institution especially parade. There is no doubt that
military values would stamp their identity on the language use during parade
(Abaya 2008).
Several events in military institution are marked
with parade. In Nigeria, Independence Day Parade is performed every 1st
October to mark Nigerian Independence, Burial Parade is performed as last
respect for falling soldiers, passing out Parade (POP) for students who
graduated from military schools and host of others for several purposes. Hence,
Parade is an indispensable part of military institution. It’s symbolic and
therefore embedded with believes shared by participants in the discourse
community. Military Parade discourse can therefore, be said to be embodied with ideological
orientation vis-a-vis dominance.
Scrolls (2001) asserts that social action and
discourse are inextricably linked i.e. they are inseparable. However, studies
on Military Parade discourse have focused on sociolinguistic, pragmatic,
semiotic and stylistic features of the discourse to the neglect of Critical
Discourse Analysis. For example, Woodward
(2010) investigates the discourse of Gender in the contemporary British Army.
Hawryluk (2010) examines the review of the Red Army and Soviet Army discourse
as a variety of language while Amafah (1990) examines the English Language use
in the Nigerian Army. Abaya (2008) demonstrates that elements or rather some
features of political language can be found in military language, while Ogundele
(2015) investigates the role of context in the effective production and
interpretation of intentions of addressors in Army’s parade interaction.
These above
studies are all premised on Military discourse; nevertheless, none of them has
specifically used the framework of Critical Discourse Analysis to unravel the
ideological prejudices and dominance embedded in Military parade discourse.
Hence, the aim of this study is to investigate the reflection of ideology
vis-à-vis dominance in the military parade discourse. The study intends to use
the framework of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) because it is concerned with
how discourse is used as an integral aspect of power and control. CDA makes
explicit aspects of ideology that underpin social interaction (Bloor and Bloor
2013).
Speech is one of the major elements that
distinguish man from other animals. This speech serves as an instrument for
achieving different purposes. Hence, Language is an indispensable part of human
society. One wonders how the human society would have been without language.
This perhaps is what made Barber (1965:9) concludes that language is the most
remarkable tool produced by man which made other inventions possible. Hence,
there exist an intrinsic relationship between language and human society. Our
social behaviors are represented in our language use. Language is the most
powerful emblem of social behavior.
Social activities such as culture, religion, occupation, government, and
politics are enacted in language use. In other words, language is used to
control the society. Institutions and social groups are formed or established
under several ideologies. These ideologies reflect in the use of language by
the institutions or social groups consciously or unconsciously. It is this
reflection of ideology and dominance in military parade discourse that
necessitates this research work. Thus, chapter
one presents the Background to the study, Statement of the Problem, the
aim and objectives of the study, justification of the study and the scope and
delimitation of the study.
The Nigerian
Military School Zaria, founded as the Boys-Company
of Nigeria in
1954, was established under the auspices of Nigerian Regiment Training Centre
of the Royal West African Frontier Force (RWAFF). The school was established along with
three others in the British Colonial West Africa in
Gambia, Ghana, and Sierra-Leone. It
was modeled after the Boys Wing of the British
Army. The present day Military School came into being on May 20, 1954.The aim
of the school was the production of "middle and skilled manpower" to
replace the departing British Colonial NCOs. Thus, a lot of emphasis was laid
on military and academic training. In 1960, the name "Boys Company"
was changed to Nigerian Military School. In 1965 the first set of Boys wrote
the West African Examination Council (WAEC).
The School runs a six-year training
programme which was divided into junior and senior classes of three years’
duration respectively. To facilitate effective administration, Military and
Academic training, the school is segmented into 5 main Wings: The
Headquarters, Military wing,
Education Wing, Boys Battalion and the Administrative Company.
The Nigerian Military School gives
its students both academic and military training. Every boy soldier as the
students are called has one day a week dedicated strictly to military training
while the other four days of the week are dedicated to academic training.
The students used to be optionally enrolled into the
Nigerian Army as private soldiers on the successful completion of their
training; in 1999 it became compulsory for graduating students to join the
Nigerian Army. Since the establishment of the Nigerian Military School, the
institution has contributed in all walks of life and remains the center of
excellence in its distinct role of training and moulding Nigeria children just
coming out of primary schools into intelligent, disciplined, Industrious,
patriotic and hardworking young boys.
The school from its establishment to
date has produced numerous Senior Military officers and Senior Staff in both
Government and Private sectors. In contributions to economic and socio – political
development in Nigeria which can be seen by its products in all fields of our
lives. The six-year duration provides the institution time to inculcate and
instilled military ideology into the children. This is done mostly through
rigorous training especially regular parade. The training is a process of
integrating ‘’the boy soldiers’’ into the discourse community of military
institution. The school therefore, serves as a Center for integrating the naïve children into military culture of
discipline and absolute loyalty to the last command. It is with this that
informed the choice of the school parade as the most suitable for this
study.
1.1
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Whenever a specialized language exists for the use
of a particular institution, that language can provide evidence useful in
understanding the way the institution views itself, its role in the larger
world, and the world as a whole. Language use carries with it implicit
meanings, which can be made explicit through careful analysis in order to
assess better the world view the language helps to create and sustain. The use
of language always has embedded within it these implicit meanings. The Nigerian
Military School, Zaria is a military institution where children from different
cultural, religious and socio-economic background are given combined secondary
education and military training simultaneously. One of the major things
instilled in the ‘’Boy soldiers' as the students are fondly called is the
ideology of the military which is ‘’total discipline’’. This is mostly done
through parade. According to Bloor and Bloor (2013) most discourse used by
members of a group tends to be ideologically based. Thus, Parade discourse is
embodied with military ideology vis-a-vis dominance in the institution.
Military parade discourse can therefore, be said to represent the institution’s
ideology.
It is however, surprising that many scholars have
studied Military Parade discourse using
pragmatic, socio-linguistic, semiotic and cognitive pragmatic approaches in
order to understand its unique features, similarities and dissimilarities with
other forms of language use by other institution in our society(see Amafa 1990,
Abaya 2008, Woodward 2010, Hawry 2010 and Ogundele 2015), but there is a dearth
of studies applying the framework of CDA (a multidisciplinary approach) in
analysing the discourse of military parade, which is capable of laying bare the
ideological distinctiveness and dominance of the military institution. This is
the gap this study seeks to fill.
1.2 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
In view of the aforementioned reasons, this study
intends to provide answers to the following questions:
a)
What are the features of Military
Parade discourse?
b)
How does Parade discourse reflect
the ideology of the Military institution?
c)
How is power manifested in
Military Parade language?
d)
How is dominance reflected in the
discourse of Military Parade?
1.3 AIM AND OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study is to investigate how the
Military parade discourse reflects the ideology and dominance of the Military
institution. Hence, the objectives of the study are as follow:
a)
To identify and document the
features of Military Parade discourse.
b)
To explain the reflection
of ideology in the Military Parade discourse.
c)
To explain the manifestation of
power in Military Parade discourse and
d)
To explicate the reflection
of dominance in Military Parade
discourse.
1.4 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
This study is restricted to a CDA on passing out
parade (POP) discourse. The choice of
POP for this thesis is because it is the parade that is always displayed at the
graduation of soldiers in Military schools after several years of training. It demonstrates that the soldiers have been
fully integrated into the discourse community. Hence, the study will explore
all parts of CDA relevant to the subject matter. This study covers all relevant
parts of CDA and military parade discourse with little reference to other necessary
areas of linguistics.
1.5 JUSTIFICATION FOR THE STUDY
Most linguistic researches on Military language
are done using Pragmatics, Sociolinguistics, Stylistics and Semiotics as areas
that can divulge the intrinsic nature of the discourse while CDA approach has
not been employed to the study of military parade discourse to the best of my
knowledge. Hence, applying the CDA approach to analyze military parade
discourse is by every means introducing a multi-disciplinary approach which is
capable of illuminating the ideological contents and dominance that are
embedded in the discourse. Being a multidisciplinary study, researchers and
students of social sciences and humanities will benefit from this study. This
is because the study will help them to understand that discourse is an integral
aspect of power and control. The study upon completion will increase awareness
to participants in the different discourse communities the intrinsic
relationship between social practice and discourse. Finally, the study will,
contribute to knowledge as a CDA material for further study.
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment