USE OF INFORMATION RETRIEVAL DEVICES FOR EFFECTIVE ACCESS OF INFORMATION RESOURCES BY UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN MICHAEL OKPARA UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, UMUDIKE

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00007055

No of Pages: 79

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

$12

 ABSTRACT


This study was carried out to evaluate the use of information retrieval devices for effective access of information resources by undergraduate students of College of Education, MOUAU using descriptive survey design. Four research questions which were formulated from the specific objectives guided the study. Questionnaire was the instrument used for data collection which was validated by experts. The data were analysed using the mean and frequency to answer the research questions. The findings from the study revealed that the available information retrieval devices in MOUAU are Card Catalogue, Abstract, Bibliography, Registers, Online Database, Search Engine, Directories, Kardex Card, Audio Tapes, Computer Hard Disk, Machine Readable Catalogue and Index. It was concluded from the findings of the study that the respondents access the retrieval devices to a High Extent (HE). Based on the findings of the study it was recommended that correct queries should be framed for each search, MOUAU management team should build an alternative means of power supply for the library, IRDs should be digitized to conform to the current standard, Internet connection with adequate bandwidth should be provided for the university library and Catalogue cards should be filled correctly and updated regularly.





TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page                                                                                                                                i

Declaration                                                                                                                              ii

Certification                                                                                                                            iii

Dedication                                                                                                                               iv

Acknowledgements                                                                                                                 v

Table of contents                                                                                                                    vi

List of tables                                                                                                                           viii

Abstract                                                                                                                                  ix

 

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1  Background of the Study                                                                                                            1

1.2 Statement of the Problem                                                                                                            5

1.3 Purpose of the Study                                                                                                        6

1.4  Research Questions                                                                                                           6

1.5 Scope of the Study                                                                                                           6

1.6 Significance of the Study                                                                                                             7

 

CHAPTER 2

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1    Conceptual Framework                                                                                                 9

2.1.1 Information                                                                                                                   9

2.1.2  Information retrieval                                                                                                     12

2.1.3  Information resources                                                                                                   15

2.1.4  Information access                                                                                                        23

2.1.5  Information retrieval devices in libraries                                                                      29

2.1.6  Extent of use of information retrieval devices in libraries                                            34

2.1.7 Challenges associated with the use of information retrieval                                         

          Devices in libraries                                                                                                        35

2.1.8 Strategies for enhancing the use of information retrieval devices in libraries.  37

2.2   Review of Empirical Studies                                                                                           39

2.3   Summary of Literature Review                                                                                       43

 

CHAPTER 3

METHODOLOGY

3.1 Design of the Study                                                                                                          45

3.2 Area of the Study                                                                                                             45

3.3 Population of the Study                                                                                                    45

3.4 Sample and Sampling Technique                                                                                      46

3.5 Instrument for Data Collection                                                                                         46

3.6  Validation of Instruments                                                                                                 47

3.7 Method of Data Collection                                                                                               47

8

3.8 Method of Data Analysis                                                                                                 48

 

CHAPTER FOUR

PRESENTATION OF RESULTS

4.1 Data Analysis                                                                                                                    49

4.2 Summary of Major Findings                                                                                             53       

4.3 Discussion of Findings                                                                                                     54

                                                 

CHAPTER FIVE

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Summary of the Study                                                                                                      57

5.2 Conclusion                                                                                                                        58

5.3 Educational Implications of the Findings                                                                         59

5.4 Limitations of the Study                                                                                                   59

5.5 Recommendations                                                                                                            60

5.6 Suggestions for Further Studies                                                                                       60

 

References                                                                                                                              62

Appendices                                                                                                                             68

 

 

 

 


 

 

LIST OF TABLES

1: information Retrieval Devices                                                                                46

2: Mean responses on the Extent of use of Information Retrieval Devices               47

3: Challenges undergraduates face in accessing retrieval devices                              48

4: Solution to the Challenges                                                                                      49

 

 

 

 

 


 

CHAPTER 1

 

INTRODUCTION

 

1.1       BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

In this era of information overflow occasioned by the advent of information and communication technology (ICT), there is need for effective information retrieval systems in libraries and information centres for optimal exploitation of available information resources. Libraries are reputed for collecting and storing different formats of information for use. However, if there is no effective means of retrieving these information, chaos and frustration set in and such a library loses its reputation.

Information Retrieval (IR) can be a very broad term, because even searching for contacts in a mobile phone is a form of information retrieval.  According to Manning (2008), information retrieval in information science parlance can be defined as finding information that satisfies an information need from within large collection. Information retrieval provides linkage between the information seeker and information resources.

The central mission of any library is not only to acquire, organize, preserve and provide access to relevant information but also ensuring their quick retrieval and satisfactory use. Effective information retrieval (IR) is a prerequisite to the successful attainment of the goals, functions and objectives of any library and information centre. The field of IR today involves not only librarians, information officers and documental list but also operation researchers and computer programmers among others. Information Storage and Retrieval (ISR) evolved to expedite the prompt retrieval of information. In order to facilitate prompt and easy access to the library information resources, the librarians have developed varieties of information retrieval tools such as catalogue, abstract, library index, bibliographies, Kardex, OPAC and other finding tools (Muhammad, 2011). These bibliographic devices constitute the basic tools for the control of library collections in libraries.

According to Spack and Willet (1997), the term Information retrieval was coined in 1952 and gained popularity in the research communities from 1961. At that time, Information retrieval’s organizing function was seen as a major advance in libraries that were no longer just storehouses of books, but as places where information was catalogued and indexed. The concept of information retrieval presupposes that there are some documents or records containing information that have been organized in an order suitable for easy retrieval.

An information retrieval system is designed to retrieve the documents or information required by the user community. It should make the right information available to the right user. Thus, an information retrieval system aims at collecting and organizing information in one or more subject areas in order to provide it to the user as soon as it is asked for. Lancaster in Chowdhury (1999) comments that an information retrieval system does not inform i.e. change the knowledge of the user on the subject of his enquiry; it merely informs him of the existence or nonexistence and whereabouts of documents relating to his request. The information retrieval system serves as a bridge between the world of creators or generation of information and the users of that information.

Two broad categories of information retrieval systems have been identified by Manning (2008). They include:

         In-house or offline Information retrieval

         Online Information retrieval

In-house information retrieval systems are set up by a particular library or information centre to serve mainly the users within the organization. An example of an in-house database is the library catalogue. Online public access catalogue (OPAC) provides facilities for library users to carry out online catalogue searches, and then check the availability of the item required. By online information retrieval systems, we mean those that have been designed to provide access to remote databases to a variety of users. Such services are available mostly on commercial basis, and there are a number of vendors that handle this sort of service.

Writers such as Vigil (1998); Manning (2008), Abdullah and Bin-Ismali (2010) in times past have suggested that an effective and reliable information retrieval system must have provision for:

         Prompt dissemination of information;

         Filtering of information;

         The right amount of information at the right time;

         Browsing;

         Getting information in an economical way;

         Current literature;

         Interpersonal communication; and

         Personal help.

In a typical library environment there are two categories of users, the library and information personnel and the end users. Library and information personnel often act as intermediaries and they may also act as end users seeking for information for their own use or for decision making (Aina, 2004). The end users include the library user community who enjoy the numerous services of the library (Nnadozie, 2007).All information retrieval systems should be user oriented. As such the interest of every user should be given due importance at every point of information storage and retrieval.  Libraries have been in existence since the beginning of writing and have served as a repository of the intellectual wealth of society. As such libraries have always been concerned with storing and retrieving information in the media it is created on. As the quantities of information grew exponentially, libraries were forced to make maximum use of information retrieval methods to facilitate the storage and retrieval process.

In the works of Su (1994), Large and Behesti (1997), Online Public Catalogues (OPAC) were first used in mid 1970s, it was only at the beginning of the next decade that a significant number of libraries switched from card catalogues to automated catalogues. However, those first catalogues were usually modules linked to the automated circulation system and had brief catalogue records and very limited functionality.

Online public catalogues (OPAC) are the interfaces that help users communicate with the collection(s) of a library. Typically OPAC allow users to search the library’s catalogue, and also provide other facilities, such as checking borrower records, reserving reading materials, library news bulletins, and so on. Several changes have taken place and OPACs have improved significantly since then. Internet resources vary significantly in terms of their content (text, numeric, audio, image video, etc.), file format, availability, URL (uniform resource locator) or the address of a web page and so on. Some new rules and guidelines are required to help cataloguers make information retrieval easy and effective.

In the light of the foregoing, the study intends to investigate the information retrieval devices for effective access of information resources by undergraduate students of College of Education in Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike (MOUAU).


 1.2      STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM 

The user of any library is the raison d’être for the library. It is stating the obvious to say that every potential user should know where information resources are within the most convenient and efficient way.

The importance of use of information retrieval devices include; eliminating the frustration of the user, and making the right information available to the right user. It facilitates easy location, identification, trace and access to needed information resources. It also helps to secure and maintain order in libraries. These in turn will reduce search complications and retrieval complexities and lead to gain time and effort. It saves the time of the user as well.

The effects of not using IRD are making the search of the user difficult; it leads to user frustration and also creates chaos and tends to complicate retrieval of information of the user. Thus, one of the keys to successful exploitation of any library information resources lies drawing up precise IRs

Since information resources can be derived from several sources, different kinds and forms, which might include among others databases and software, electronic, audio-visual  and printed items, like Thesis, Journals, Textbooks, Workshop papers, Technical reports, Conference proceedings etc, these volumes of information created, generated and stored are immense that without adequate knowledge of information retrieval devices, the retrieval process for an information user would be cumbersome and frustrating. This then makes it necessary to ensure a stable and functional Information Retrieval System (IRS). This is supported by Alemna (2000) who stated that “in Africa, it appears that there are so much information within our borders that we can use to assist us in our developmental process, but without better methods to filter, retrieve and manage this potentially unlimited influx of information; users face information overload and they require tools to explore the vast universe of information”.

It is in view of this that, the researcher has set out to find out how Undergraduate students in MOUAU use information devices for effective access of information resources.

  

      1.3              PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

 

The main purpose of the study is to determine the extent of use of information retrieval devices that are used for accessing information resources by undergraduate students of College of Education, MOUAU. The specific objectives are to:

1.                  find out the types of information retrieval devices available in MOUAU Library for effective access of information resources;

2.                  determine the extent of use of information retrieval devices for effective access of information resources in MOUAU Library by undergraduate students of College of Education;

3.                  identify the challenges associated with the use of information retrieval devices for effective access of information resources in MOUAU Library by undergraduate students of College of Education; and

4.                  Suggest strategies for enhancing the use of information retrieval devices for effective access of information resources in MOUAU Library by undergraduate students of College of Education.


1.5        RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The following research questions would be answered in this study

1.      What information retrieval devices are available in MOUAU Library for effective access of information resources?

2.      To what extent are undergraduate students of College of Education accessing information retrieval devices in MOUAU Library?

3.      What are the challenges undergraduate students of College of Education in MOUAU face accessing information retrieval devices in MOUAU Library?

4.      What are the strategies for enhancing access of information retrieval devices by the undergraduate students of College of Education?

 

1.6        SCOPE OF THE STUDY

 

This study is on the use of information retrieval devices for effective access of information resources by undergraduate students of College of Education, MOUAU. It explores the various information retrieval devices in the MOUAU library, their use and challenges faced when using the retrieval devices.

 

1.7        SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

 

The finding of this study will be of immense benefit to undergraduate students, all categories of library users, library managers, library system designers and other users.

The study would increase the understanding of information retrieval devices by undergraduate student. Undergraduates with information retrieval skills should be able to recognise information need for learning and research, distinguish ways of addressing gap and locating information stored in electronic resources. Moreover, they should be able to perform literature searches, organise and communicate the information retrieved, satisfactorily in their research work.

Library users:  They generally will benefit as the study would highlight those necessary processes and practices that would ensure timely and efficient information retrieval and would therefore promote effective use of library materials.

Library managers: The study would be of immense benefit to library managers who are the promoters of information retrieval devices. Library managers would understand and manage those bottlenecks that challenge effective information retrieval. They will also need this study in order to effectively plan on the ways of handling library staff and library resources to achieve their set goals.

Library system designers: The library system designers will benefit from the study as they will know the bibliographic items needed to be input in the library catalogue system.

Other researchers: Other researchers would find the study useful as it will add to existing literature in information retrieval devices.

 

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment