DESIGN, FABRICATION AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF PEDAL OPERATED GROUNDNUT DECORTICATOR

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00005225

No of Pages: 83

No of Chapters: 5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦3000

ABSTRACT

Shelling of groundnut pods (Arachis hypegea) by hand is tedious, laborious and unhygienic with low efficiencies. As a result farmer get low income due to amount of broken kernels and a lot of time is lost in the tedious shelling operation. To overcome this problem, pertinent parameters that influence shelling efficiency of pedal operated groundnut decorticator were identified. Pedal operated decorticator were designed and fabricated with chain and sprocket of bicycle and aluminum spike tooth is used and evaluation was done in the department of Agricultural and Bio-Environmental Engineering Technology, Kwara State Polytechnic, Ilorin because it was affordable and locally fabricated. A rotary motion mechanism was employed to drive the decorticating drum while concave screen was fixed. The selection of the screen aperture was based on the size and shape of the groundnut seed. The factors considered in this project work were feed rate and operators characteristics (height, weight and knuckle lengths). The evaluation of machine was conducted while time was taken for each tests. The result of the pedal operated groundnut decorticator revealed that operator III has the maximum shelling efficiency of 65% was achieved at 9minutes, 16 seconds and breakage of 9% and throughput capacity of 15.3kg/hr. Operator II was the optimum shelling efficiency of 56% at 12 minutes 44 seconds and breakage of 8% and throughput capacity of 14kg/hr. Operator I has the minimum shelling efficiency of 47% at 11 minutes 44 seconds and breakage of 16% and throughput capacity of 15kg/hr. The total amount used for the fabrication of the pedal operated groundnut decorticator was totaled to Ninety-two Thousand and Seven Hundred Naira only (N92,700.00). The result of the fabricator implies that the characteristics of Operator III is recommended to farmers who shell for seed can now obtained more seed shelled with low breakage and will get more income.




TABLE OF CONTENTS

Cover Page                                                                                                                                         i

Title Page                                                                                                                                           ii

Certification   iii

Dedication   iv

Acknowledgements  v

Abstract  vi

Table of Contents  vii

List of Tables  xi

List of Figures  xii

List of Plates  xiii


CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION   1

1.1          Background to the Study  1

1.2          Statement of the Problems  2

1.3          Objective of the Project  2

1.4          Justification of the Project  3

1.5          Scope of the Study  3


CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW     4

2.1          Physical Properties of Groundnut  4

2.1.1      Determination of Size   4

2.1.2      Determination of Coefficient of Friction   5

2.1.3      Determination of Moisture Content  5

2.1.4      Angle of Repose   6

2.1.5      Porosity  6

2.1.6      Surface Area  6

2.2          History of Groundnut in Nigeria  6

2.3          Agronomy of Groundnut  7

2.4          Post Harvest Losses of Groundnut Seeds  8

2.5          Economic Importance of Groundnut Seed   9

2.6          Factor Affecting Shelling Operation   11

2.6.1      Cylinder-Concave Clearance   11

2.6.2      Sieve Shake   12

2.7          Description of some Threshing Equipment  12

2.7.1      Maize Sheller  12

2.7.2      Maize Dehusker-cum Sheller: 13

2.7.3:    Hand Maize Sheller  13

2.7.4      Groundnut Striper  14

2.7.5:     Groundnut Thresher  15

2.7.6:     Groundnut Decorticator Manually Operated   16

2.7.7      Power Operated Groundnut Decorticator  17

2.7.8      Pedal Operated Thresher (Paddy Thresher): 18

2.8          Terminology Related to Thresher  18

2.8.1      Feed Rate   18

2.8.2      Clean Grain   19

2.8.3      Concave Clearance   19

2.8.4      Cleaning Efficiency  19

2.8.5      Threshing Efficiency  19

2.9     Review of Existing work  19


CHAPTER THREE: MATERIAL AND METHODS 

3.1          Physical Properties of Biological Materials  23

3.1.1      Sample Preparation   23

3.1.2      Determination of Size and Shape   24

3.1.3      Determination of Moisture Content  24

3.1.4      Determination of Mass, Volume and Density  25

3.1.5      Determination of Coefficient of Static Friction   25

3.1.6      Determination of Angle of Repose   25

3.2          Description of the Groundnut Pedal Operated Machine   26

3.3          Design Consideration   28

3.4          Design Calculation and Analysis  28

3.4.1      Design for Hopper  28

3.4.2.     Design for Decorticating Unit  29

3.4.3      Design of Chain Drive   32

3.4.3.1   Determination of Chain Length between the Pedal and Idler Shaft  32

3.4.3.2   Determination of Chain Length Between the Idler Shaft and Decorticating Shaft  33

3.4.3.3   Determination of Chain Length Between the Idler Shaft and Blower Shaft  33

3.5          Material Selection   34

3.6          Fabrication Procedure and Assembly  34

3.6.1      Fabrication of Main Frame   34

3.6.2      Fabrication of Hopper  35

3.6.3      Fabrication of Bicycle Pedal and Chain Drive   35

3.6.4      Fabrication of Decorticating Drum    35

3.6.5      Decorticating Screen   35

3.6.6      Operator Seat  36

3.6.7      Aluminum Spike Tooth   36

3.7          Principle of Operation of the Machine   36

3.8          Cost Analysis  37

3.9          Performance Evaluation   38

3.9.1      Sourcing of Experimental Material 38

3.9.2      Sample Preparation   38

3.9.3      Experimental Procedure   38

3.9.4      Instrumentation Used for the Experiment  39

3.9.5      Design Layout  42

3.9.6      Output Parameter  42


CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION  

4.0          Results And Discussion   45

4.1          Results  45

4.2.         Discussion   46

4.2.1      Physical Properties of Groundnut Pods  46

4.2.2      Effect of Operator Parameter Threshing Efficiency  47


CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 

5.1          Conclusions  48

5.2          Recommendations  48

References  49

Appendix A   52

Appendix B   59

 





 

LIST OF TABLES

 

Table No                                        Description                                                                       Pages 

Table 3.1:             BILL OF ENGINEERING MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION (BEME)  37

Table 3.1:             Sample Preparation   38

Table 4.1              Data Sheet for Physical Properties of Groundnut Pods  45

Table 4.2              Data Sheet for Output Parameters  45

Table 4.3              Data Sheet for Output  46

Table 4.4              Average Performance of Thresher  46




 

LIST OF FIGURES

 

Figure No                                       Description                                                                       Pages 

Figure 2.1:                           Maize Sheller  13

Figure 2.2:                           Hand Maize Sheller  14

Figure 2.3:                           Groundnut Thresher  16

Figure 2.4:                           Manual Operated Groundnut Decorticator (Oscillating Type)  17

Figure  2.5                           Power Operated Groundnut Decorticator  18

 




 

LIST OF PLATES

 

Plate No                                         Description                                                                       Pages 

Plate 2.1:                             Groundnut Pod   9

Plate 3.1:                             Sample of Groundnut Seed   23

Plate 3.2:                             Determination of Coefficient of Static Friction and Angle of Repose   26

Plate 3.3:                             Pedal Operated Groundnut Decorticator  27

Plate 3.3:                             Digital Venier Caliper  39

Plate 3.4:                             Digital Weighing Scale   40

Plate 3.5:                             Digital Stop Watch Scale   40

Plate 3.6:                             Electric Oven   41

Plate 3.7:                             Tachometer  41

 


 






CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

 

1.1          Background to the Study

Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) is a species in the legume or beans family (Ashish and Handa, 2014; Atiku et al., 2014).  It was first cultivated in Peru. Its seed contain about 63% carbohydrate, 19% protein and 6.5% oil. Groundnuts are grown in tropical and subtropical climate regions and warmer parts of temperature regions and it is low growing annual plant and has a variety of uses.  Prior to its usage however groundnut need to undergo preprocessing which include drying and shelling.  Removing of kernels from the pod is generally referred to as shelling or “decorticating” (Maduako et al., 2006).  In Nigeria groundnut is mainly decorticate by hands (traditional method).  This method is not hygienic as dirt from hands and mouth could pose health risk from the nuts. (FAO. 2001).

Shelling is a fundamental step in groundnut processing as it allows the kernel and hull to be used as well as other post harvesting technologies to take place such as oil extraction or in hull briquetting (Pradhana et al., 2010). Shelling is usually carried out on the farm just before the farmer sells his product for the following reasons: Kernel do not store as well as nuts in the shell and groundnuts in the shell are fifty per cent heavier than kernels alone and therefore costlier to transport. Shelling can generally be done by hand or machine. Hand shelling is the process in which the pod is pressed between the thumb and first finger so that the kernel is released.  In mechanization now we use large and smaller machinery for groundnut shelling. These machines are used in industries where large production is required. There are different methods of shelling and different machines have been fabricated and used to shell wide variety of crops under different conditions (Nyeaanga et al., 2003., Atiku et al., 2004; Gitau et al., 2013; and Maduako et al., 2006).  The peasant farmer cannot afford this machine because they are too costly and complex in operation and maintenance.  Also the operator had to be trained and spare part imported.  These factor increase the overall cost production which does not make any economic sense to the farmer.

 

1.2          Statement of the Problems

            Research shows that groundnut has an inherent poor storage life, if not threshed after harvesting unlike some other crops, but in threshed forms, it can be stored for a very long period of time (Onuoha 2010). Therefore, to overcome the problem associated with manual threshing and quick rate of insect infestation after harvesting, the development of groundnut decorticating machine is of paramount. Traditionally the seeds are left in the pods which would then be stored in a pot and would only be shelled when they are needed for cooking (Ngugi, 2007), shelling is one by hand or beating with a short stick or pestle and mortar, followed by winnowing (Kaul and Egbo, 1985). The constraints such as fatigue, high time energy inputs and inefficiency in manual shelling of groundnut led to design and fabrication of pedal operated groundnut Sheller that will go a long way in solving the problem of rural farmers that are engage in groundnut production at small and medium scale level.

 

1.3          Objective of the Project

The main objective of the project is to design and fabricate a pedal operated groundnut decorticator that will remove and separate the groundnut seed from the hull for domestic and industrial uses.

The Specific Objectives are to:

1.                  determine the physical properties of groundnut seed in relation to the design of pedal operated ground decorticator.

2.                  design and fabricate a pedal operated groundnut decorticator

3.                  evaluate the performance of the decorticator in terms of decorticating. Efficiency, percentage of breakage, percentage of shelled seed throughput capacity.

 

1.4          Justification of the Project

Due to high lose that are recorded due to lack of adequate power supply, these are expected to be achieve at the end of the project. We can save the time and money by using pedal operated groundnut decorticator, limited number of labour will be required, groundnut will be available for domestic and industrial use. The fabrication of the machine will encourage the farmers to grow more groundnuts.

The machine would overcome the traditional method by reducing wastage due to crack or crushed groundnut, to increase the efficiency, to reduce the hard work and to reduced time to shell the groundnut, to develop a low cost machine which can be used by farmer to convert their semi-finished (shell groundnut) into finished product (groundnut) and it satisfies the need of village people to earn more money.  

 

1.5          Scope of the Study

Groundnut is the sixth most important oil seed crop in the world and is widely cultivated in Nigeria.  The project work is limited to groundnut seed. The variable factors to be considered in this study were feed rate and characteristics of the operator (weight, height and knuckle length).

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment