TABLE
OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER
ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of Study
1.2 Statement
of the Problem
1.3 Objectives
of Study
1.4 Significance
of Study
1.5 Scope of the Study
1.6 Research Hypothesis
1.8 Definition of Terms
CHAPTER
TWO
REVIEW
OF RELATED LITERATURE
2.0 Introduction
2.1 Theoretical
Framework
2.2 Conceptual
Review
2.2.1 Democracy as a Concept
2.2.2 Political Participation in Nigeria
2.3 Dynamics in Political Participation
2.4 Political
Participation and Sustainable Development
2.5 Democracy, Political Participation and Good Governance:
The Interface
2.6 Empirical Review
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.0 Introduction
3.1 Research Design
3.2 Area of the Study
3.3 Population of the Study
3.4 Sample Size and Technique of the Study
3.5 Instrument for Data Collection
3.6 Reliability and Validity of Instrument
3.7 Techniques of Data Analysis
3.8 Scoring of the Research Instrument
3.9 Decision Rule
CHAPTER
FOUR
DATA
PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
4.1
Bio
– Data of Respondents
4.2 Tables based on research questions
4.3 Hypothesis
to be tested
CHAPTER
FIVE
SUMMARY,
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1 Findings
5.2 Recommendation
REFERENCES
APPENDIX: QUESTIONNAIRE ADMINISTRATION
CHAPTER
ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
BACKGROUND OF STUDY
The
Nigerian state assumed a new governance status in 1999 following the demise of
authoritarian regime in the country. Military dictatorship was replaced by
representative democracy with the hopes and aspirations of good governance much
higher than what the seemingly collapsible democratic institutions could
fulfill. The source and nature of transition in 1999 was later found to
constitute threat to the foundation of democracy and obliterates the current
efforts at consolidating democracy.
The
reality of the attempts to subvert the concept of democracy to serve the
interests of a few, rather than a greater majority, still looms high. The
emerging democracy was artificial and reflexive of external imposition. It is a
weak democracy that repudiates inalienable ethos of its true identity.
Democracy and political participation are related to good governance are
interrelated and complementary but appear to be antithetical in Nigeria.
Democracy in Nigeria is alien and its practice has proved difficult.
Democracy
is abused, good governance becomes elusive and evasive. This is what Darl
(1989) describes as “virtual democracy”, democracy that shares resemblance with
true democracy but lacks basic tenets of democracy. Democracy in Nigeria has
three unique features which include: insulation of economic matters from
popular participation, manipulation and monopolization of democratic process
including the use of violence and electoral fraud to secure legitimacy and
peripheral participation of citizens. Surface-level participation does not have
far-reaching influence on the outcome of policy choices.
According
to Oke (2010) democracy involves the opportunity to participate in decision
making in the political process. It repudiates arbitrariness and
authoritarianism. It extols the consent of the governed and it protects human
personality and values (Ake, 1991). Democracy, whether liberal, African or
modern, includes equal opportunity for all, fundamental recognition of popular sovereignty,
representativeness, majority rule, minority rights, popular consultation, right
of choice between alternative programmes, consensus on fundamental issues, as
well as essentially periodic elections (Oke, 2005). The concept of democracy
confers the opportunity to participate in decision making by all.
Democracy
here goes beyond opportunity of election. Although, the centrality of elections
to democratic process can not be over-emphasized, democracy is not wholly centered
on election. For democracy to evolve good governance, it must be liberal and
participatory. In this sense, Liberal democracy entails not only free and fair
elections in terms of voting administration, it requires a more comprehensive
fairness of political competition embodied in the concept of a just and open
competition. In a liberal democracy, the electoral arena is open, and the
playing field is reasonably level.
Only
in a free society with opportunity of free participation and respects for
citizens’ rights can good governance be achieved. True democracy places
emphasis on freedom, and open competition, popular and meaningful
participation, responsiveness, transparency and accountability. Freedom to
organise, freedom to protest anti-people policies and freedom to demand and assert
citizens’ rights and interests, freedom of the press to report, investigate and
expose government policies and actions without fear or favour. According to
Diamond (2005), “Only in a climate of true political and civil freedom can a
country achieve the absolute fundamental condition for development: responsible
government—that is government that is committed to the advancement of the
public good, rather than the private interests of its own officials and their
families and their cronies”.
1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
The experience with citizens’ participation in electoral
politics in Nigeria generally and Delta state in particular has not been
encouraging. Even where development of local participation is an important tool
of rural development and where political education in mass participation is a
key element of the development strategy, programmes have not developed genuine
participation and responsibility among the people.
The people have become recipients of development as if
development is something outside their realms of experience and right
respectively. There are political, socio-cultural and bureaucratic constraints
to political participation.
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF STUDY
The main objective of this project work is to consider the
nature and extent of political participation by the people in a democratic
system. This, as noted above, will be carried out by assessing the involvement
of the people in electoral process in Asaba, Delta state.
Besides, this research work also aims at achieving other
important objectives which are also fundamental to the smooth operations of
governance in a democratic set up. The other objectives are enumerated below:
1.
To
establish any possible relationship between political education and political
participation in order to clearly state the crucial ingredient of political
participation;
2.
To
examine the legal framework of electoral system and election administration in
Nigeria in order to spot their inadequacies and provide possible amendments;
3.
To
propose a number of strategies to mobilize citizens for increased political
participation and effectiveness respectively in the country as a whole; and
4.
To
know the degree of confidence the people have in the electoral system of their
state/country as it is assumed that this is reflected in their participation in
electoral politics.
1.4 SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY
This research work is significant because it is aimed at
explaining political participation in the context of good governance. This will
enables us to appreciate the fact that the formulation of a national agenda
through dialogue by all stakeholders is a prerequisite for political
participation.
Participation needs to be part of a broader conceptualization of
development, with much more attention to organizational structures and
linkages. However, participation has turned into a cliché for those
administering development; its values have been overemphasized, while doing
little to make it a reality.
1.5 SCOPE
OF THE STUDY
This project work shall discuss the concept of political
participation, focusing mainly on what it is and what it is not within the
African context. The history of Nigeria’s politics shall be traced from the
colonial era to the present. The gathering of views on the electoral politics
shall be restricted to Asaba Delta State with reference to the 2003, 2007, 2011
and 2015 general elections covering Gubernatorial, House of Assembly and Local
Government elections in the state.
1.6 RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
The research hypothesis that will serve as the yardstick for the
administration of the questionnaire shall be based on the theoretical framework
that political education is fundamental to political participation. Therefore,
the research hypotheses are:
H0: That the extent of the political participation of the people
in electoral politics is not related to their political education.
H1: That the extent of the political participation of the people
in electoral politics is related to their political education.
Where H0 is the Hull Hypothesis, while H1 is the Alternative
Hypothesis
1.7 DEFINITION OF TERMS
DEMOCRACY; A
system of government in which power is vested in the people, who rule either
directly or through freely elected representatives.
POLITICAL PARTICIPATION; Political
participation can be defined as those
actions of private citizens by which they seek to influence or to support
government and politics.
ELECTION; An
election is a formal decision
making process by which a population chooses an individual to hold public office.
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment