UTILIZATION OF IMPROVED MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR INDIGENOUS CHICKEN PRODUCTION AMONG RURAL FARMERS IN SOUTH- EAST, NIGERIA

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00009250

No of Pages: 142

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦10000

  • $

ABSTRACT

Rural farmers in Southeast Nigeria are still grappling with production of indigenous chicken despite the development and dissemination of improved management practices for the enterprise in the area. Thus a study which examined the utilization of improved management practices for indigenous chicken production in South East Nigeria was conceived and carried out. The specific objectives of the study included among others to ascertain types of production system used by respondents; examine the level of production of indigenous chicken kept by rural farmers in the area; ascertain respondents awareness of improved management practices for indigenous chicken productions among rural farmers in the area; ascertain farmers perceived attributes of indigenous chicken management practices in the study area. Total of 360 respondents were selected across the zone through purposive and multi-stage random sampling techniques for the study. Structured questionnaire were used to obtain responses from the local chicken farmers who were the target respondents. Data collected were analyzed using simple descriptive statistics (such as frequency counts, percentages, mean etc.) as well as ordinary least square of multiple regression as well as analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results of the study revealed that the larger proportion of indigenous farmers were female (76.7%) with mean age of 42years. Majority of the respondents were married (66.6%), attained secondary and above (70.6%), were full-time farmers (55.3%), had mean monthly income of N37254.17. /The result indicated that though majority of the respondents were aware of the improved management practices for indigenous chicken production in the study area, yet only use of three management practices namely brooding practices ( =3.09) housing practice ( =3.38) feeding practices ( =3.26) were highly in use by the farmers. The results of hypotheses testing showed that stock size (5.852***), monthly income (1.955**) had significant positive effects on extent of farmers’ use of improved management practices for indigenous chicken production in the study area in the study area. However, farmers’ age (t-2.108**) and household size (t-3.398***) had negative relationships with their use of improved management practices from indigenous chicken production in the study area. Also, the ANOVA result at p<0.05 shows that there was a significant difference in the level of use of improved indigenous chicken production technology across the states of Anambra, Ebonyi and Imo. Further results from DMRT confirmed that use of the improved practices among farmers in Anambra was significantly higher than in Imo and Ebonyi States. However, there was no significant difference in farmers’ use of the improved management practices for indigenous chicken production in Imo and Ebonyi States. In view of the forgoing, it is thus recommended that Government agencies (ADP and Research Institutes) responsible for promoting technologies should organize programmes for training of indigenous chicken farmers and intending ones in the area of Best practices for chicken production in order to increase their level of production (stock size. Also Extension agents should encourage farmers to register with farmers’ co-operative society to enable them have access to bank facility (credit), inputs, grants from government or agency especially in Anambra State and Imo State where there is high respondents that were not members of social group which might be the cause of high percentage of their problem in aspect of input and credit unavailability. Finally, farmers should encourage practicing intensive system of production, proper selection of birds for cross breeding exotic breed/improved local strain to achieve good weight gain and high performance in production.





TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page                                                                                                                    i

Certification                                                                                                                ii

Declaration                                                                                                                 iii

Dedication                                                                                                                   iv

Acknowledgements                                                                                                    v

Table of Contents                                                                                                       vii

List of Tables                                                                                                              xi

List of Figures                                                                                                             xii

Abstract                                                                                                                      xiv

 

 

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION                                                                            1

1.1       Background of the Study                                                                                1

1.2       Statement of the Problem                                                                               5

1.3       Research Questions                                                                                        7

1.4       Objectives of the Study                                                                                  8

1.5       Hypotheses of the Study                                                                                 9

1.6       Significance of the Study                                                                               9

1.7       Scope of the Study                                                                                          11

1.8       Definition of Operational Terms                                                                    11

1.9       Limitation of the Study                                                                                   13

 

CHAPTER 2:  LITERATURE REVIEW                                                                 14

 

2.1.      Conceptual Review                                                                                         14

2.1       Overview of Agricultural and Livestock Development in Nigeria                        14

2.1.1    Socio-economic attributes of livestock production                                        14

2.1.2    Characterization of the Nigerian indigenous chicken                                   19

2.1.3   Importance of indigenous chicken production                                               25

2.1.4    Role of rural women in village chicken production and ownership                        31

2.1.5    Management and production system of indigenous chicken in

            developing country.                                                                                        33

2.1.6    Gender analysis and livestock production                                                      35

2.1.7.   Marketing of local chickens in developing country                                       39

2.1.8.   Poultry diseases                                                                                              41

2.1.9    Technology transfer in agriculture                                                                 43

2.1.10  Process of adoption of innovations by rural farmers                                      45

2.1.11  Agricultural communication process                                                              47

2.1.12  Poultry diseases                                                                                              49

2.1.13  Common types of poultry diseases                                                                 50

2.1.13.1 Newcastle disease.                                                                                        50

2.1.13.2 Fowl pox diseases                                                                                         53

2.1.13.3 Fowl cholera diseases                                                                                   54

2.1.13.4 Chronic respiratory diseases (CRD)                                                             54

2.1.13.5 Fowl typhoid or pullorum diseases                                                              56

2.1.13.6 Marek’s disease                                                                                            57

2.1.13.7Coccidiosis disease                                                                                        57

2.1.14  External parasites                                                                                           60

2.1.15  Nutritional deficiency diseases of poultry                                                      15

2.1.16  Controlling diseases in scavenging flocks (indigenous chickens)                        63

2.2.      Empirical Studies on Indigenous Production in Nigeria                                66

2.3       Theoretical Framework                                                                                  69

2.3.1    Technology theory                                                                                          69

2.3.2.   Cultural lag theory.                                                                                         70

2.3.3    Theory of perceived attribute                                                                         71

2.3.4.   Modernization theory                                                                                     72

2.4       Conceptual framework                                                                                   75

2.4.1    Independent variable                                                                                      75

2.4.2    Dependent variable                                                                                         75

2.4.3    Intervening variables                                                                                      76

2.4.4    Moderating variables                                                                                      76

 

CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY                                                                           79

3.1       Study Area                                                                                                      79

3.2       Population of the Study.                                                                                 81

3.3       Sample and Sampling Procedure                                                                    81

3.4       Data Collection                                                                                              81

3.5       Validity of Instrument                                                                                    82

3.6       Test of Reliability                                                                                           82

3.7       Data Analysis                                                                                                  82

 

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                                                      90

4.1       Socio-economic Characteristic of Respondents                                             90

4.1.1    Sex                                                                                                                  90

4.1.2    Age                                                                                                                 92

4.1.3    Marital status                                                                                                  92

4.1.4    Level of education                                                                                          93

4.1.5    Occupational status                                                                                         94

 

4.1.6    Farming experience (years)                                                                            96

4.1.7    Religion                                                                                                          96

4.1.8    Household size                                                                                                96

4.1.9    Monthly income (N)                                                                                       97

4.1.10  Cooperative membership                                                                                97

4.1.11  Access to credit                                                                                              98

4.1.12  Extension contact                                                                                           99

4.1.13  Reasons for keeping birds                                                                              99

4.2       System of Production Used                                                                            100

4.3       Level of Production of Indigenous Chicken                                                   101

4.4       Farmers’ Awareness of Improved Management Practices  for Indigenous      102

4.5      Extent of Use of Improved Management Practices for Indigenous Chicken

            Production in South- East, Nigeria                                                                 105

4.6       Farmers’ Perceived Attributes of the Technologies                                       109

4.7       Problems Affecting Utilization of Improved Management Practices for

            Indigenous Chicken Production                                                                     113

 

4.8       Test of Hypothesis                                                                                          115

4.8.1    Test of hypothesis 1                                                                                        115

4.9       Hypothesis 2: There is no Significant Difference in the Extent of Use of Improved Management Practices for Indigenous Chicken Production

            Among the States.                                                                                           118

4.10    Hypothesis 3: There is no Significant Relationship Between Perceived

            Attributes of the Technology and the Extent of Use of Improved

             Management Practices for Indigenous Chicken Technology.                        120

 

4.11     Hypothesis 4: There is no Significant Difference in the Extent of Use of

            Various Components of Improved Management Practices for Indigenous Chicken Production in the Study Area.                                                   124


CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS     126

5.1       Summary                                                                                                         126

5.2       Conclusion                                                                                                      130

5.3       Recommendations                                                                                          132

References                                                                                                     

Appendix                                                                                                       

                                                                              

 



 

 

 

LIST OF TABLES


2.1:       Recommended age and route of administration of vaccine                          52

2.2:       principal parasites affecting poultry.                                                                                                                            59

2.3:      Principal internal parasites affecting indigenous chicken                             60

 4.1a:   Percentage distribution of the respondents according to their socio-              economic characteristics                                                                                 91

 4.1b:   Percentage distribution of the respondents according to their

            socio-economic characteristics.                                                                      95

4  4.2   System of production used by farmers in the study area                                100

 4.3:     Percentage distribution of respondent according to their level

            production                                                                                                       101

 4.4:     Distribution of farmers’ responses on their awareness of improved

            management    practices for indigenous chicken                                            103

 4.5:     Mean distribution on the extent of use of technology in South East Nigeria            108

 

 4.6:     Mean distribution of farmers’ perceived attributes of the technologies    112

 

 4.7:     Problems affecting utilization of improved indigenous poultry production       technologies                                                                                                    114

 

 4:8      Result of the ordinary least square test of the relationship between selected           socioeconomic characteristics and the extent of use of improved indigenous chicken production technologies                                                                     117

 4. 9a: Analysis of variance result of the test of difference in the extent of use of          improved management practices for indigenous chicken production across

            the states.                                                                                                        119

 10b:    Pooled results of the ordinary least square test of the relationship between           perceived attributes of the improved management practices for indigenous          chicken production and the extent of use of the improved practices in the

            study area                                                                                                        119

 








LIST OF FIGURES   

                                                      

1:         A conceptual; framework for utilization of improved management practices

             for indigenous chicken production among rural farmers in Southeast, Nigeria 77


2:         Map of South –East region of Nigeria                                                                80

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1       BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Poultry is an important component of the rural economy in diversifying agricultural production and increasing household food security (Sonaiya, 2015; Nnadi, 2016; Norman et al., 2014).Poultry production in Nigeria amount  up to 454 billion tons of meat and 3.8million eggs per year, with a standing population of 180million  birds .About  80million chicken are raised in extensive system of production,60million in semi-intensive system and the remaining 40million in intensive system.(African Sustainable Livestock 2050(.2018); Food and Agricultural Organization Statistics(2018).

Indigenous chicken being a specie of poultry plays a significant role in the livelihoods of human and it contributes significantly to food security of the rural communities (Fan et al.,2013; Fida et al, 2018; FAO,2012) It is a valuable asset to local populations, especially in disadvantaged groups and less favored areas of rural Africa, considering its socio-economic characteristic and the promotion of gender equality. The industry is crucial for meeting up with protein needs of man. (IFAD, 2013). According to Asmelash et al, (2018) small holder farming families and people with income below poverty line are able to raise chicken with low input and harvest the benefit its products of eggs and meat. The products are highly nutritious and have the capacity to fill the yawning protein gap. The sale of eggs and live birds in urban and rural markets is an important source of cash earnings available to rural families. It is worthy to note that the United Kingdom Department of Health and Social Security recommended protein at about 68g a day for sedentary or moderately active men and 54g a day for women (UKDHSS, 2009).

Being an integral part of the economy in Nigeria, the practice provides not only needed animal protein, but also employment and good income for many citizens, thus accelerating poverty alleviation (FAO, 2010; Nutrition source, 2016). Animal protein sources have been acknowledged to contain higher biological value, being major sources of a wide range of essential micro-nutrients, in particular minerals such as iron and zinc, vitamin A etc. Indigenous chicken meat is preferred by consumers because of its palatable quality, cheap, affordable, low fat and high marbled meat when compared to exotic poultry meat.  Additionally, poultry egg is an excellent source of high quality protein and amino acid, rich in choline that helps in brain development, lutein and zeaxanthin; anti-oxidants for good eye sight and reduction of age- related muscular degeneration, vitamin D for strong bones, selenium for prevention of cardiac arrest, stroke, heart attack, formation of blood clots among others (Vukasoric, 2014).Indigenous chicken is also used in religious sacrifice, a means of knowing time (communication) offered as gift and in cementing marriages and friendship. In communities where food shortages are common, chickens are kept to supplement the meals or to host guests (Padhi, 2016; Ifenkwe and Ekweanya, 2015; Nwachukwu, 2014).

 Furthermore, the system production of these birds in developing countries is extensive (scavenging) or semi-intensive (Ayanwale,et al 2015).Some small holder farmers still hold opportunities to use exotic breeds for improvement of local stock which they do under realistic management conditions resembling the reality of smallholder farming (FAO, 2010).This breeding management practice does not work alone without application or utilization of other improved management practices like proper brooding, feeding, housing, health care and disease control in the production activities to ensure high productivity of indigenous chicken  in the rural areas. To achieve increased productivity, extension agents through ADP has continuously disseminated management intervention packages to rural farmers aimed at improving their production activities and mitigating the challenges associated with local chicken production. However, majority of the smallholder farmers with smaller flock size hardly realizes improved productivity which could be explained by manner in which they selectively utilize or refuse to utilize disseminated improved management interventions package. According to Nwachukwu, (2003) stated that for farmers to benefit from such technologies they must first have access to the information or the technology. Furthermore, Meyer (2005) observed that inaccessibility to information on improved technologies was responsible for lack of awareness of these improved practices to farmers, which in turn contribute to their low level of utilization of agricultural production technology.

It is with this understanding that African Chicken Genetic Gain (ACGG) project conducted a baseline survey in 2015-2016 across ACGG countries (i.e. Nigeria, Tanzania and Ethiopia) to understand, define and characterize the current smallholder chicken production system, chicken ecotypes, current productivity, husbandry practices, farmers’ production objectives and the socio-economic status of the poor chicken producing smallholder farmers. Based on the Nigeria baseline information for sustainable improvement of indigenous chicken production under smallholder systems in the diverse agro-ecological regions, ACGG is also following this approach and testing the performance of tropically adapted breeds (exotic, exotic but locally improved, and locally improved chickens) for egg productivity, growth and likability by farmers. The multiple response analysis result showed that 89.09% of households preferred the local chicken breeds to other chicken breed types. The reason for their preference for the local chicken breeds were many, However, less sickness, better meat taste, more eggs and longevity are the major reasons with high percentage response (Mahendra, 2016; Sonaiya, 2016).

Livestock farmers, especially chicken farmers face a lot of challenges like high mortality, high cost of feed and feeding materials, inadequate extension service, low productivity of local chicken etc. Udedibie et al. (2012) stated that 80-90% of chickens die within the first 2weeks after hatching, due to diseases (Newcastle) and predation. Indigenous chicken is exposed to various hazards and disease conditions that affect its flock size and productivity (Dessie, 2017; FAO, 2018). The common ways by which infectious diseases are introduced in the flock and spread are through the introduction of disease by carrier birds, poultry crates, feeders, drinkers, litter material, etc. Other means can be through contaminated feed, human movement in and out of the poultry house, air- borne infections and through egg transmission and vectors, especially those that are on intensive and semi- intensive system of production (UNDP, 2006).

Some of these diseases may be caused by protozoa, bacterial and viral if not properly managed. They include- coccidiosis, fowl typhoid, chronic respiratory disease (CRD), fowl pox, new castle disease, Gumboro etc. Disease occurrence normally leads to the impairment of body function causing mechanical and thermal injuries, nutritional deficiency, poisons, heredity and congenital problems, which can be acute or chronic. Conceicao (2012) stated that the sources of economic losses in poultry business include lack of technical know-how, poor quality of feed, poor housing, mismanagement and disease outbreak. The possible ways of controlling these diseases include those measures taken to exclude diseases from unaffected population of birds (isolation). It usually includes quarantine vaccination, routine medication etc. Though in most cases, rural farmers use local/traditional medicine in the prevention of these diseases while some literate ones use orthodox methods (Gebremariam et al 2017). The survival of the local breeds is threatened by several factors of economic and social needs. For example, Cross breeding with exotic breeds in an uncontrolled way is in fact one of the major cause that erode genetic diversity in the developing world, although it is considered a way of improving the productivity (Makos et al., 2016). Therefore, this study is to analyze the utilization of improved management practices for indigenous chicken production among rural farmers in south- east Nigeria.


1.2       PROBLEM STATEMENT

Production of poultry, especially indigenous chicken in the South East region of Nigeria is not just for meeting the protein needs of the family but is also means of survival as food and cash income earner for many of the rural poor especially the landless ownership of local chicken farmers (FAO, 2008; Herrero et al., 2013). So in this era of harsh economic conditions, dwindling national resources, hardship, food insecurity especially in the rural areas of Nigeria coupled with unemployment and high population growth; sustainability becomes the watchword of every endeavor. Indigenous chicken production being an aged practice of rural farmers and some of them are illiterate and do not have the knowledge of rearing and management of exotic breeds of chicken. (Gwary et al, 2015) Moreso, these exotic birds are often not suited to local conditions and demand high investments in feeds, veterinary supports and energy(rearing requirements) that affect their performance and production capacity.(Dueye,2015). The improvement of indigenous chicken production can be one of the sustainable ways of improving food security, livelihood of the resource- poor farmers, especially women (Malesse, 2014; Fida et al, 2018).

Presently in Nigeria, there has been a total neglect of indigenous chicken species of livestock in some rural areas, thereby making local chicken production or rearing to go into extinction in some parts of the country. The neglect to this is attributed to its small body size resulting in low dressing percentage, low egg yield and small egg size, slow growth rate, thus making it less productive, non-attractive and undesirable in a competitive economic situation. All these are attributed to negligence over improvement of local breeds and poor management practices of the birds by the local farmers (Markos et al., 2016; Mahendra, 2016).  Recently, international livestock research institute(ILRI) introduced a program aimed at improving local chicken in Africa (ACGG) in which Imo State is one of the states selected in Nigeria. Their vision is to transform small holder chicken(SHC) production into a commercially viable enterprise through the delivery of more productive locally adapted chicken. So there is need to investigate the present state of production of indigenous chicken in south –east will serve as a base-line information on farmers level of production and utilization of improved technology.

Moreover, there has been ban on importation of poultry products coupled with high cost and inadequate supply of the products in the country irrespective of population growth, the pressure on the livestock sector to meet with the growing demand for the high value animal protein was difficult. It now calls for the need to fill the protein gap especially in the rural areas (Ariri, 2016; Capper, 2013).Other issues contributing to the decline in indigenous chicken production include, high prevalence of uncontrolled pest and diseases, poor management practices, bad weather conditions, poor sanitary conditions, use of unimproved stock, and poor housing.(Dessie,2017) The factors among others contribute to the record of high morbidity and mortality which discourages so many investors from the poultry business or industry because of its poor profitability. It has been reported by Nwachukwu, (2014) that one of the main problems of agriculture is lack of technology and improper communication of scientific findings needed for economic and social change. More so, inaccessibility to research information on improved technologies was responsible for lack of awareness among farmers, which in turn contributed to farmer’s low level of adoption of agricultural-production technology (Uguru et al, 2015). Currently, there is dearth of information on whether indigenous chicken rural farmers are aware of improved management practices developed to increase local chicken production in south-East Nigeria as against indigenous practices.

It is, therefore, imperative that efforts be channeled towards the improvement on the production and management system of Nigerian indigenous chicken bearing in mind its potentials for rural poverty alleviation, animal protein food security, employment, income etc. That will help ease the demand-supply gap in the country. These have to be addressed to enable the industry to thrive especially now the economy is recovering from recession. This study seeks to fill this knowledge gap by examining the utilization of improved management practices for indigenous chicken production among rural farmers in South-east Nigeria.


1.3       RESEARCH QUESTIONS 

(1)       What are the socio-economic and demographic characteristics of indigenous chicken farmers in the study area?

(2)       What are the types of production system used among rural indigenous chicken farmers in south east of Nigeria?

(3)       What is the level of production of indigenous chicken kept in the study area?

(4)       What is the level of awareness of improved management practices for indigenous chicken farmers in the study area?

(5)       What is the extent of use of improved management practices for indigenous chicken farmers   in south east of Nigeria?

(6)       What are the farmers’ perceptions to improved management practices in the study area?

(7)       What are farmer’s constraints to the use of improved management practices in the study area?


1.4       OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

Broad objective

The major objective of the study was to analyze the utilization of improved management practices of indigenous chicken among rural farmers in the South east of Nigeria. Specific Objectives were to:

  1. describe the socio-economic characteristics of indigenous chicken farmers in the study area.
  2. ascertain types of production system used by respondents.
  3. examine the level of production of indigenous chicken kept by rural famers in the area.
  4. ascertain respondent’s awareness of improved management practices for indigenous chicken production.
  5. assess extent of use of improved management practices for indigenous chicken production among rural farmers in the area.
  6. ascertain farmers perceived attributes of improved management practices for indigenous chicken production in the study area.
  7. ddetermine the prevailing constraints to improved management practices for indigenous chicken production.

1.5      HYPOTHESES OF THE STUDY

The hypotheses of the study were stated in null form and these include:

Hypothesis 1: There is no significant relationship between selected socio-economic characteristics of the respondents and the extent of use of improved management practices for indigenous chicken production.

Hypothesis 2: There is no significant difference in the mean use of improved management practices for indigenous chicken production among the States in South east, Nigeria.

Hypothesis 3: There is no significant relationship between farmers’ perceived attributes of the improved management practices for indigenous chicken and the extent of use of these practices.

Hypothesis 4: There is no significant difference in the extent of use and different component of improved management practices for indigenous chicken production in the study area.


1.6       SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY

According to FAO, (2013) the world will need by 2050 to feed an additional 2 billion people and require 70% more animal protein to achieve that. It is reasoned that livestock (chicken production) is part of the solution to global food insecurity and measure for eradication of extreme poverty. In the rural communities of South-east, Nigeria, livestock production especially chicken among rural households in the region is not just for meeting the protein needs of the family but is also an income earner and has some prestige attached to it. Chicken in south-east Nigeria also has some socio-economic and cultural value.

As reported by Melesse2014; FAO, 2012, livestock production is an important contributor to sustainable food security for many nations, particularly in low-income areas, and marginal habitats that are not suitable for crop production (Godber and Wall, 2014).  Chicken production is important because of the divergent roles it plays in improving the nutritional status, providing employment, income, food security and livelihood of small holders. This is significant owing to low cost of production and also having a utility use of meat and eggs that contributes to protein need of low – income and food deficit countries. The products (eggs and meat) are highly nutritious and have the capacity to fill the yearning protein gap. They are high quality source of Protein, Vitamins, and micro nutrients, cheap and without taboos (FAO, 2010; Norman, et al 2014).

Chicken production has been contributing to socio-cultural functions in rural communities (Ifenkwe and Ekweanya (2015) added that local chicken are important for special festivals, offered as gift to honour special guest, good meat for festivals like New Yam Festivals, naming ceremony and gift to a newly married couple, which signifies acceptance and cementing marriages and friendship thereby strengthening social networks between women and men in the society. Chicken permits farmers to raise money in times of need and valuable for medical and veterinary research (Assets function). They help in provision of input for other activities; manure which help to improve seed germination and growth thereby helping in high production crops (UNDP, 2006).

Studies were conducted by Dunya et al, (2015) on the Local chicken management in rural Bornu State Nigeria and Kperegbeyi et al, (2019) on effect of local chicken production strategy of household poultry development in Niger Delta Nigeria, but they were not comprehensive enough and site specific. Utilization of improved management practices for  indigenous chicken production among Rural farmers in South-east Nigeria is an essential prerequisite to bring this into effect. This work will provide simple tools and lesson on how to improve the productivity of these chickens and enhance household food security and its sufficiency.

The study will be relevant to extension agent and other stakeholders by using the findings to transform households from passive to active chicken producers using basic chicken management knowledge and skills. It will also provide a background for quality policy formation in boosting meat production among rural households especially now there is ban on importation of frozen chicken in Nigeria. Finally, it will contribute to knowledge and serve as reference material to researchers and students in the field of agriculture and rural development in South-East, and Nigeria at large.


1.7       SCOPE OF THE STUDY

This study was carried out in three States (Anambra, Ebonyi, and Imo State) out of the five States that make up the Southeast agro – Ecological Zones. Respondents were indigenous Chicken farmers.


1.8       DEFINITION OF TERMS

1.     Indigenous- An act of belonging to a particular place or area [nature] rather than coming to it from someone else.

2.     Household -   A group of people often a family who lives together and feed from the same pot.

3.     Chicken Production - The process of growing local birds for meat or eggs  especially in large quantities.

4.     Rural-The area that is still very local in nature and underdeveloped.

5.     Rural Household - This is a group of people or families who live together in an underdeveloped area.

6.     Food-Security - The state of having reliable access to a sufficient quality of affordable, nutritious food.

7.     Local- Belonging to or connected with a particular area or place where you live.

8.     Awareness-This is knowing or realizing that something exist(its important and becoming interested or not)

9.     Management- An act of running and controlling a livestock business or project for optimum profitability

10.  The South East Zone-  The area between latitude 4o 20’N and 7o 25’N and Longitude 5o 21’ and 8o 51’N covering a land area of about 109 524 Sqkm, which represents about 11.86% of the total area of the region .

11.  Poverty Alleviation- The state of being relieved from being poor or unable to buy ones basic needs.    

12.  Chicken Production: Chicken production refers to the series of activities aimed at selecting breeding, feeding, housing and maintaining those chicken (birds) kept by man for economic and social benefits.

13.  Livestock: They are farm animals kept by man for economic and social benefits.

14.  Brooding: This is defined as the management of chicks from one-day old to about 4 – 8 weeks of age, and it involves the provision of heat and other necessary care during chicks’ early growing period.

15.  Vaccination: This is a health management practices that involves routine inoculation of vaccine (drug) to the birds to boost their immune system that suppress the effect of the virus.

16.  Management: It is an integrated activity that results in husbanding the animal from birth until market. It incorporates the housing, feeding (nutrition) and health maintenance of the animal.

17.  Culling: This is the identification and removal of birds from the hen (mother) or flock that does not possess the qualities for giving enough benefit in return for their culture.


1.9       LIMITATION OF THE STUDY

In the course of the study, the researcher encountered some challenges. Shortly after distribution of my questionnaire the incidence of Covid-1 occurred. This distorted the use of interview and focus group discussion in the states studied. So, some oral information were not obtained from the farmers. The farmers refused taking pictures either because of fear of Covid-19 or fear of where the picture will be taken to. Cost of transportation and mode of transport were also major challenges especially during retrieving/collection of filled questionnaire. This is as a result of inter-state lock down. 

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.

Review


To Comment