ANALYSIS OF EFFECTIVENESS OF TRANSFER AND UTILIZATION OF ODOURLESS CASSAVA FUFU FLOUR PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY AMONG RURAL WOMEN IN SOUTH - EAST, NIGERIA

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00009245

No of Pages: 262

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦10000

  • $

ABSTRACT

 The study investigated the effectiveness of transfer and utilization of odourless cassava fufu flour processing technology among rural women in South–Eastern, Nigeria A purposive and multistage random sampling technique was used to select a sample of 480 respondents across the three selected State in South East, Nigeria. Data were collected through interview schedule/questionnaire and Focus Group Discussion. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to realized and test data. Respondents had a mean age of 40 years in South East ,  Results of  the mean (  2.87) of the respondents indicated that the transfer agents were not very effective in transferring the technology. On effectiveness of utilization, a pooled mean of (  3.0) indicated an effective utilization. On factors influencing transfer a very high proportion indicated (82.5%, 85% and 85%), that cost of technology, cosmopolitness and timely provision of the module severely influenced transfer across the States, while result on factors influencing utilization show that benefits (  4.40) smell (  3.45) acceptability (  4.30) affordability (  4.40) and type of demonstration (  4.30) influenced the utilization of the technology to a great extent. Results from test of hypothesis one revealed a significant influence between methods used in transfer and utilization of odourless cassava fufu flour in South East (X2 67.20, P < 0.05   ). Hence the null hypothesis was rejected and the alternative accepted at 5% level of probability. Tobit regression result on (age, education, farm size, and out-put) influenced   utilization of the odourless cassava fufu  flour processing technology in South East at ( X66.06, P < 0.05)of probability. The simple linear regression estimate  model also indicated a significant relationship between farmers utilization and contact with transfer agencies at ( R2  0718, P < 0.05  ) level of probability. Result of Tobit regression  also indicated a positive and significant influence between effective transfer and the technological characteristics of the odourless cassava fufu  flour processing technology in South East at  (R0.787 ,  P < 0.05  ) levels of probability. Tobit regression estimate result on showed that (simplicity and time saving at ( 052.76, P < 0.05 ) level of probability influenced the effectiveness of odourless cassava fufu flour processing technology transfer in South East, Nigeria. Result from Tobit regression estimate on hypothesis six revealed that the economic characteristics influenced utilization of odourless cassava fufu flour at ( 0.507, P < 0.05) level of probability.

The result of ANOVA showed a  no  significant difference in the utilization of odourless cassava fufu flour processing technology transferred based on the significant value (F- value 3.89, P < 0.05) across South East ,Nigeria. The study recommended more visitations between the transfer agencies and the respondents also by timely provision of technology module and regular training to the utilizers of the technology across the South Eastern Nigeria in other to enhance the rate of utilization of the technology across the States studied.








TABLE OF CONTENTS


Title page                                                                                                                                i

Declaration                                                                                                                             ii

Certification                                                                                                                           iii

Dedication                                                                                                                              iv

Acknowledgments                                                                                                                  v

Table of Contents                                                                                                                   vii

List of Tables                                                                                                                          xi

List of Figures                                                                                                                         xiii

Abstract                                                                                                                                  xiv


Chapter 1

Introduction

1.1 Background of the Study                                                                                                  1

1.2 Statement of Problem                                                                                                       5

1.3 Research Questions                                                                                                          8

1.4 Objectives of the Study                                                                                                    9

1.5 Hypotheses of the Study                                                                                                   10

1.6 Justification of the Study                                                                                                  11

1.7 Scope of the Study                                                                                                            12

1.8 Definition of Terms                                                                                                          13

1.9Limitations of Study                                                                                                          14


Chapter 2

Literature Review

2.1.1    Concept of Technology                                                                                              16

2.1.1.2 Concept of Technology Transfer/Adoption                                                               16

2.1.1.3 Importance of Technology                                                                                         17

2.1.2    Cassava By -Products in Nigeria’s Economy                                                            18

2.1.3    Trends of Agriculture in Nigeria                                                                                19

2.1.4    Demand and supply trend of cassava in Nigeria                                                        22

2.1.5    Expansion in cassava production                                                                               25

2.1.6    Constraints to cassava production in Nigeria                                                             27

2.1.7    Cassava as food security crop                                                                                    28

2.1.8    Gender and cassava production                                                                                  28

2.1.9Cassava processing technologies                                                                                                                                               40

2.1.10  Odourless  cassava    fufu  flour                                                                                 41                                                                                                    

2.1.11  Agricultural extension transformation approach                                                        44

2.1.12  Research, technology development and transfer                                                        47

2.1.13  Technology generation sub-system                                                                            51

2.1.14  Technology dissemination                                                                                         56

2.1.15  Diffusion and adoption of innovation                                                                        60

2.1.16  Attributes of innovation and rate of adoption                                                            66

2.1.17  Communication concept in agricultural extension                                                     72

2.1.18  Communication channels in agriculture                                                                    76

2.2       Review of Empirical Studies                                                                                      79

2.3       Theoretical background to the study                                                                          98

2.3.1    Diffusion of innovation theory                                                                                   99

2.3.2    Knowles’ adult learning theory assumptions                                                             105

2.3.3    Theoretical framework of the study                                                                           109

2.4       Conceptual framework of the study                                                                           113

 

Chapter 3

Research Methodology

3.1       Study area                                                                                                                   117

3.2       Study population                                                    121

3.3       Sampling procedure                                                                                                    121

3.4       Data collection                                                                                                           122

3.5          Validity of instrument                                                                                                                           123

3.6          Reliability of instruments                                                                                                      123

3.7       Data analysis                                                                                                               123

3.8       Measurement of variables                                                                                          133

 

Chapter 4

Results and Discussion

4.1a     Socio-economic Characteristics of the Respondents (Cassava women Farmers)          140

4.1b     Socio-Economic Characteristics of Transfer Agents                                                 148

4.2a     Awareness of odourless cassava fufu  processing technology by farmers                        152

4.2b     Awareness of odourless cassava fufu  processing technology by transfer agents 154

4.3       Source of Information on Odourless Cassava Fufu Technology                               156

4.4       level of transfer agent contact with the women farmers                                            159

4.5       Methods used by transfer agencies to transfer odourless cassava

fufu  processing technology                                                                                       162

4.6       Different types of processing activities utilized by the women processors of

            Odourless cassava fufu technology                                                                            164

4.7       Effectiveness of the transfer agencies                                                                        166

4.8       Effectiveness of Utilization of Odourless Cassava Fufu Processing Technology     168

4.9       Effective transfer of odourless cassava fufu processing technology by transfer

agencies                                                                                                                      170

4.10     Factors influencing the effective utilization of odourless cassava fufu

processing technology                                                                                                173

4.11     Hypothesis Testing                                                                                                     177

4.11.1 Hypothesis 1                                                                                                               177

4.11.2 Hypothesis 2                                                                                                               181

4.11.3 Hypothesis 3                                                                                                               185

4.11.4 Hypothesis 4                                                                                                               187

4.11.5 Hypothesis 5                                                                                                               190

4.11.6 Hypothesis 6                                                                                                               194

4.11.7 Hypothesis 7                                                                                                               197


Chapter 5

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1       Summary                                                                                                                    199

5.2       Conclusion                                                                                                                  204

5.3       Recommendations                                                                                                      207

 

References                                                                                                     208

Appendix 1                                                                                                      226

Appendix 2                                                                                                   243

Appendix 3                                                                                                     246

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

List of Tables

 

Table                                      Title                                                            Page


4.1       The Socio-economic Characteristics of women Farmers                                           147

4.1.2    The Socio-economic Characteristics of Transfer Agents                                           151

4.2a     Distribution of respondents based on their Awareness of Odourless Cassava

Fufu Processing Technology by Farmers                                                                   152

4.2b     Awareness of Odourless Cassava Fufu Processing Technology by transfer Agents            155

4.3       Distribution of respondents based on source of information on odourless cassava

fufu technology                                                                                                          158

4.4         Distribution of respondents based on the rate transfer agencies contact with the

women farmers                                                                                                          161

4.5       Methods Used by the Different Transfer Agencies in the Disseminating

Odourless Cassava Fufu Processing Technology                                                       163

4.6       Methods utilized by the women proccessors of  odourless cassava fufu

technology                                                                                                                  165

4.7       Distribution of respondents based on the effectiveness of transfer odourless

Cassava fufu  processing technology                                                                         167

4.8       Effectiveness of Utilization of  Odourless Cassava Fufu Processing Technology     169

4.9       Factors Influencing Effective Transfer of  odourless Cassava Fufu  Processing

Technology by transfer Agents                                                                                  172

4.10     Factors Influencing the Effective Utilization of Odourless Cassava Fufu

 Processing Technology                                                                                             176

4.11.1  Tobit regression estimate of relationship between method used in transfer and

            utilization of   odourless cassava fufu in the study area                                             180

4.11.2  Tobit  regression estimates of the influences socioe- conomic characteristics of the

            women farmers (respondents) on their utilization of cassava odourless fufu

            processing technology                                                                                                184

4.11.3  Simple linear regression of the relationship between farmers (respondents)

utilization of odourless cassava fufu processing technologies and contact with

transfer agencies                                                                                                         186

4.11.4  Regression estimate of the influence of technological characteristics on the

effectiveness of transfer of odourless cassava fufu  flour  processing                         189

4.11.5  Regression estimate of the influence of economic characteristics of the technology

on the effectiveness of transfer of odourless  cassava fufu  flour by the transfer agencies                                                                                                               193

4.11.6  Regression estimates of influence of technological characteristics on the

effectiveness of utilization of odourless cassava fufu            flour                                       196

4.11.7  ANOVA (DNMRT) showing differences in the utilization of odourless

Cassava fufu  flour processing technologies across the States studied                        198

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

List of Figures


Figure                                                             Title                                  Page

1                      Flowchart for the Production of Odourless Cassava Fufu Flour               43

2                      Adopter categories on the basis of Innovativeness                                        70

3                      Conceptual Framework                                                                                  114

4                      Map of study area                                                                                           119

 

 


 

 


CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION


1.1       BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Agricultural transformation can be achieved in Nigeria through effective, well-designed and well-executed system of technology development, transfer and utilization among it citizenry (Olatunji, Nwakor and Asumugha, 2015). Agriculture occupies a key position in Nigeria’s economy judging by its critical roles of enhancing food security, revenue generation, as well as provision of employment and raw materials for industrial development (Mehari, Amsalu and Tewedros, 2015). These roles have made the sector very critical in Nigeria’s march towards economic development (IITA, 2009, 2013)

From  post-independence era till date,agriculture  has  been the major  and  most  important  factor  to our developmental  efforts (Nwachukwu, 1999). Agriculture provides the basic food requirements for the country’s teeming population, contributes to the country’s foreign exchange earnings which in turn enhance importation of other needed commodities, provides employment for a greater part ofthe working population, serves as a source of local raw materials for industries, and ensures a high per capita real income for farm families in the rural and urban areas of Nigeria.

Attempts by previous governments to develop and reform the agricultural sector attest to this fact. The Federal Government of Nigeria has in the past made efforts to expand and modernize agriculture, with a view to increasing agricultural productivity and enhancing food security in the country. In spite of these efforts, the demand for food production does not appear to be meeting domestic and   export needs. Nigeria is unarguably one of the most endowed countries in the world.It has abundant land, water and human resources. However, in spite of these advantages and past agricultural policies and programmes, quality food in sufficient quantities has continued to elude the majority of the population.

The contributions of agriculture to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) declined steadily from 63% in 1960-61 to 37% in 1999, 23.86% in 2013,24.18 % in 2014 (CBN Annual report 2013-2014) 33.85% in 2017(NBS, 2017) and 25.9% in 2018 (NBS, 2018).Nigeria  has continued  to import  food  to bridge  the alarming  gap created by insufficient  locally-produced  food  items  due to the  decline  in the output  of our major  food  crops. The problems which plague Nigeria development efforts have not abated,despite the array of measures already taken or currently being contemplated by various governments to attain the major objectives of self-sufficiency( Nwachukwu (1999),as cited in Ekwe (2004).

In Nigeria, research studies have shown that women play major roles in key farming operations such as planting, weeding and harvesting and processing. Some areas have certain crops designated ‘female’ crops. Findings from the United Nations Development Programmes (UNDP) also reveal that women make up to 60-80% of agricultural labour force in Nigeria (World Bank, 2003).

The process of agricultural development is not a simple one. It is a complex process that requires a series of interrelated and communicatively-linked systems to generate and diffuse information and technical innovation, ranging from abstract theories and assumptions of science, through applied research, development of specific innovations, and adaptive testing, to diffusion of the locally-tested product to the farmer, (Lionberger and Chang,1970; Nwachukwu, 1999).Enhancing food production in Nigeria demands that farmers should be reached with appropriate technologies that are economically - viable and culturally - acceptable (Sokoya, 1998).

Food crops travel along the food value chain from input supply todemand and consumption. Value addition to food is an effort to reorient production to meet future challenges from the viewpoint of increase in food production, income of households and national food security (Ifenkwe,2017).For cassava production to be market- driven, value must be added to it, through conversion to other by–products such as garri, odourless cassava fufu, tapioca, starch, chips, flour, and animal feed that are more stable, safer, available and market preferred (Nwosu and Ogbonnaya, 2014; Obinna,2015).

Analysis of the effectiveness of transfer and utilization ofodourless cassava fufu processing technology is the focus of this research. In this  study,  transfer  and utilization of the new agricultural  technology  is  viewed as taking  place in two  inter-related parts  of technology  transfer.

(i)             The transfer  sub-system or dissemination   agencies(extension)

(ii)           The utilization sub-system (farmers).

Each sub-system has the resources and methods through which resources and decisions are applied to produce an output. The two sub-systems have new and improved agricultural technology as their outputs. For the farmer’s sub-system, the ultimate outputs are increase in crop yield and income. Effective transfer and utilization of technology is, therefore, viewed as a process through which the results of the transferred technology will lead to the utilization of the technology in order to maximize farmers yield and increase income in a relatively short period of time by the utilizers of the technology (Nwachukwu, 1999).

Cassava Fufu is the second major product consumed by households in South-east, Nigeria. It ranks next to garri in importance. It is a fermented wet paste made from cassava roots. Cassava Fufu is very rich in carbohydrate. Traditionally, it is produced in the wet form with moisture content of 40 -50 percent and with characteristic offensive odour. It is widely consumed in the Eastern and South-western Nigeria. The odour in the cassava fufu makes the product highly perishable with a short shelf life, compared with garri. The marketing structure is similar to that of garri. However, the price of wet fufu is lower, at ₦ 2000 per basin.

In order to increase its shelf life, quality and quantities supplied, odourless Cassava fufu processing technology was developed by the National Root Crop Research Institute, Umudike some decades ago. Odourless cassava fufu is a white fermented carbohydrate food produced  from  cassava  root, unlike  the  traditional  fufu  whichis  normally in wet form, and highly  perishable. The fufu  is presented  in dried  form, is  odourless,inelastic and slightly  sour having a low particle  size  and  zero  cyanide  content (FIIRO,2016).

Odourlessc assava fufu processing flour is one of the off-farm activities carried out by the rural women. It is, therefore, necessary to extend and device improved techniques capable of increasing the income-generating capability of rural women and enhancing acceptability of cassava value-added products and widening the market base.

Odourless Cassava fufu processing involves a combination of activities which are performed in stages. Such activities are: (i) Peeling; (ii) Fermenting by soaking in water, (iii)Removal ofwater, grating into mash,  (iv) Putting the  grated mash into a container, covering and leaving it for a day, dehydrating by pressing inside a clean bag, (v) Breaking the  pressed  mash into granules,(vi) Spreading thinly to dry on a clean surface preferably on a raised platform,(sundrying), (vii) When dry, grindingto fine  powder and sifting, (viii) Packaging in  an airtight  container  or food–grading  polyethylene bag.

Odourless cassava fufu has the potential to improve the rural economy in South-East Nigeria by reducing surpluses of cassava tubers; thereby increasing the market which will result in the expansion ofthe area under cultivation, thereby encourage large-scale use of processing technology by the processors and ultimately increasing their income.


1.2       STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Nigeria needs a road map for sustainable food security, as a result it is necessary to encourage increase food production, in the country by increasing the number of producers and the level of produc tivity mostly at the grassroots level (Umeh and Nwachukwu,2015) Food production in Nigeria seems to be declining over the years, in spite of the fact that technology advancement has been recorded in numerous fields (Olatunji et al, 2015). Ijere (1992) explained that the rapid increase in Nigeria’s population growth has continued to widen the gap between food demand and supply. Several factors have been linked to this undesirable situation, These include: low income/capital, land fragmentation, use of crude and simple implements, rural-urban migration of youths, poor rural infrastructure, pests and disease out-break, poor processing and storage facilities, inadequate technologies and ineffective agricultural extension systems (Ugwoke et al., 2005; Olatunji et al., 2014, NBS,2018).

Nigeria  and many other West African  countries  have  a network  of national  and international  agricultural research stations, with several years of research experience  on the problems  of soils, crops and livestock development  in the area (Nwachukwu, 1999).  In Nigeria, out of 20 Commodity Research Institutes created by the Federal Government of Nigeria, five are concerned with  arable  food  crops research. They are, National  Cereals  Research  Institute (NCRI), National  Root Crop  Research Institute, Umudike (NRCRI),National  Horticultural Research Institute, Ibadan (NIHORT),Institute of Agricultural Research  and Training (IAR&T) Ibadan, and Institute  of  Agricultural  Research (IAR), Zaria. The National Root Crops Research Institute, Umudike, Abia State is an agricultural research institute in Nigeria. Its origins can be traced back to an experimental farm established at Moor Plantation, Ibadan on January 1, 1923 by the Nigerian Department of Agriculture. The School of Agriculture was established in 1955, and the two establishments were combined as the Eastern Nigeria Agricultural Research and Training Station (ARTS) in 1956, with headquarters at Enugu. In 1972, the institution assumed federal status as the Federal Agricultural Research and Training Station (FARTS). In 1976 it was renamed the National Root Crops Research Institute, coming under the Agricultural Research Council of Nigeria. In 1995, the training wing was split off as the Federal College of Agriculture, Ishiagu.The institute conducts research into genetic improvement of economically important root and tuber crops such as cassava, yam, cocoyam, sweet potato, Irish potato, ginger, rizga, Hausa potato, sugar beets and Turmeric. It also researches subjects such as crop cultivation techniques, storage, processing and utilization of the crops, 

Over two decades ago, Odourless  cassava  fufu processing  technology  was introduced  to the farmers  of South-east  agro-ecological zone in Nigeria by the NRCRI, Umudike, through  the relevant transfer  agencies in the Zone. The NRCRI has the responsibility of research into genetic improvement of cassava, yam, sweet potato, ginger, turmeric and cocoyam (Oguniyan et al., 2012; Nwakor et  al., 2014). According to Olatunji and Nwakor (2015), there were at least 16 categories of root and tuber crops technologies that the NRCRI had developed and disseminated. Some of these include, improved cassava varieties, improved sweet potato varieties, improved yam varieties, value addition to food crops, and improved Odourless cassava  fufu processing technology.Odourless cassava fufu, produced from Cassava (Manihot esculenta) ,is an important food security crop grown mostly by women in the South-Eastern, South-Southern and South-Western Nigeria (Ikwelle et al., 2003).

The National Root Crops Research Institute (NRCRI), Umudike having promoted value addition and processing technology for Odourless Cassava fufu (Olatunji and Nwakor, 2015). It is expected that this technology would have been transferred from the research station to the end users (that is, the farmers) via the transfer agencies. The goal of achieving agricultural transformation would be a mirage if developed technologies remain in the research stations.

Against this background, it was pertinent to ascertain the extent to which Odourless Cassava Fufu Flour processing technology, developed by the NRCRI, Umudike, was transferred to women farmers by transfer agencies in South-East, Nigeria. Research work by Olatunji and Nwakor, (2015) Okorafor and Nwaobiala (2014) Nwakor, Aniedu and Olatunji (2014), Anamgbo et al, (2006) Ekwe (2004) focused their studies on South-East and specifically on value addition and factors affecting   garri processing, and other cassava by–products such as the odourless cassava fufu in the region. This researcher is however worried by the low supply recorded in demand of odourless cassava fufu in the region, In spite of the breakthroughs recorded by NRCRI in technology development; this odourless cassava fufu flour products is not available in the common markets and restaurants like garri and semovita. Again, there  has been few or  no research known to this researcher, which  systematically  studied  transfer  agencies and rural  women  farmers situation particularly  as they affect  transfer  and utilization  of odourless  cassava  fufu flour  processing technology.

This study, therefore, sought to provide information on the analysis of effectiveness of transfer and utilization of odourless cassavafufu processing technology among rural women in South-East Nigeria.


1.3       RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The following research questions were addressed in this study:

i.       What are the socio -economic characteristics of the respondents?

ii.      Are the women farmers aware of the odourless cassava fufu flour processing technology transferred?

iii.     What are the sources of information about odourless cassava fufu flour processing technology to the respondents?

iv.     What is the level of transfer agents’ contact by the women farmers?

v.       What are the methods used   by transfer  agencies in transfering the odourless cassava fufu flour processing technology?

vi      What are the different type of  processing activites of odourless cassava fufu flour processing technology used by women farmers?

vii.    What is the level of effectiveness of transfer of odourless cassava fufu flour processing technology by transfer agencies?

viii.   Whatis the level of effectiveness of utilization of odourless cassava fufu flour processing technology?

xi.     What are the factors influencing the transfer of odourless cassava fufu flour processing technology?

x.       What  are  the factors  influencing  the  utilization  of  odourless cassava fufu flour processing  technology amongst  women  in the  study area ?


1.4 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The broad objective of the study was to analyze the effectiveness of transfer and utilization of odourless cassava fufu flour processing technology among rural women in South-East, Nigeria.

The specific objectives were to:

i      describe the  socio- economic characteristics of the transfer agents and women farmers

 ii    ascertain  the  respondents  awareness  of odourless  cassava fufu  flour  processing  technology  transferred  to  them;

iii.   examine the sources  of information on odourless cassava fufu flour  processing technology to the respondents;

iv.   determine the level of  transfer  agencies  contact  with the women farmers;

v.    examine the methods used in disseminating odourless cassava fufu  flour processing technology;

vi.   identify the different type of activities of the odourless cassava fufu  flour processing technology utilized by the women;

vii   determine the level of effectiveness of transfer  of  odourless cassava fufu flour processing technology;

viii. ascertain the level of effectiveness of utilization of odourless cassava fufu  flour processing  technology;

ix.   determine the factors  influencing transfer of odourless cassava fufu flour processing technology; and

x.    determine  factors influencing the utilization of odourless cassava fufu flour  processing  technology in the study area;.

1.5       HYPOTHESES OF THE STUDY

In order to achieve the objectives of the study, the following hypotheses were tested.

HO1:   There is no significant relationship between method used in transfer of odourless cassava fufu flour technology and utilization of odourless cassava fufu inthe study area.

HO2:   Utilization  of odourless cassava fufu processing  technology in the  study  area was not  influenced  by  the  selected socio- economic  characteristics  of the  women  farmers.

HO3:There  is no significant  relationship  between  the  farmers  utilization  of  odourless cassava  fufu  flour  processing  technology  and  their  contacts  with  transfer agencies.;

HO4: There is no significant relationship in the effectiveness of transfer of odourless cassava fufu flour processing  technology and the technological characteristics of the technology.

HO5: There is no significant relationship in the effectiveness of transfer of odourless cassava fufu flour by transfer agencies and the economic characteristics of the technology.

HO6: There is no significant relationship in the effectiveness of utilization of odourless cassava fufu flour and the technological characteristics of the technology.

HO7:   There is no  significant relationship in the utilization of odourless cassava fufu flour processing technology transferred across the States.

1.6       JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY

This study was necessary because it added both practical and theoretical significance to knowledge.This is the first study, known to the researcher, which systematically studied odourless cassava fufu  flour processing  technology, by considering the interaction between transfer  agencies and  women farmers’(utilizers) with regards to odourless cassava fufu  flour processing technology.

The study generated information on the extent and effect of some selected socio-economic characteristics  of respondents on  the transfer and utilization of odourless cassava fufu technology among  rural women in South-East,Nigeria. The study also  ascertain the awareness  of odourless  cassava fufu  processing  technology  and identified methods used in transfered by transfer agencies in disseminating the technology to the end users. The diversification of cassava to odourless cassava fufu promises   high potentiality for wedging hunger, alleviating poverty, as well as enhancing the livelihoods of many rural farming households.

The study will be helpful to National Root Crop Research Institute, Umudike, Non-Governmental   Organizations (NGOs), like the Women Associations, transfer agencies. By identifying the different process of activities of the technology used, they would use the knowlegde to sponsor farmers that want to embark on odourless cassava fufu processing and marketing.

The study has also generated data which would be a reference material to future researchers in the field of cassava technologies, value addition on odourless cassava fufu, and agriculture in general.  The results of  the study has also revealed factors that effectively influenced transfer and utilization of odourless cassava fufu technology and ways that the dissemination of the technology can best be harnessed and effectively be utilized by end users of the technology


1.7       SCOPE OF THE STUDY

The study was de-limited to South-East Agro Ecological zone of Nigeria. Three States, Abia, Anambra and Imo, among the five States were purposively selected for the study.The study  focused on cassava women  farmers  and transfer agencies   of the selected States. The scope covered analysis of effectiveness of transfer and utilization of odourless cassava fufu processing technology in South-eastern Nigeria, and made recommendations based on the findings.


1.8       DEFINITION OF TERMS

Odourless Cassava Fufu Technology development: The process of developing or bringing into existence, new processing knowledge of techniques on how to process harvested raw cassava into odourless cassava form by applying some improved activities such as the time of fermentation, grinding, sundrying, packaging and much more,in order to make the cassava fufu odourless  developed by National Root Crop Research Institute.

Diffusion: The general (aggregate level) process by which the idea of improved odourless cassava processingtechnology were communicated in the study areas.

 Adoption: The decision that the utilizers of technology make each time they consider taking up or utilizing an innovation like odourless cassava fufu processing technology.

Transfer: An act of extending, disseminating, dispersing, distributing, circulating or spreading the odourless cassava fufu processing technology among women farmers inorder to boost their production capacity, yield and income.

Utilization: The act of putting the concept of the odourless cassava fufu processing technology into practical use by the utilizers of the technology.

Effectiveness: The ability, drive or capabilities of producing desired results by technology dissemination agencies. When something is pronounced effective, it means it has achieved an intended or expected outcome, or produced a deep, vivid impression. Effectiveness  is the  degree  to which  the transfer  and utilization  of odourless cassava fufu processing were achieved,and  the  extent  to which  targeted  problems of cassava spoilage and waste were  solved  in these study.

Cassava: (Manihot esculenta) is a dicotyledonous root crop of the botanical family (Euphobiaceae), and a perennial woody shrub with an edible root, which grows in tropical and sub-tropical areas of the world.

Odourless cassava  fufu Flour: Is a white, fermented  carbohydrate  food produced  from  cassava  root, unlike  the  traditional  fufu  which  is  normally  in wet  form, and highly  perishable. The product is mostly presented in dried form,is odourless, inelastic and slightly sour, having a low particle size and zero cyanide content.


1.9       LIMITATIONS OF STUDY

In the course of this study, the researcher encountered some challenges.To get through the communities in the selected States in order to administer the questionnaire effectively was not easy.

In other to overcome the challenges, the researcher hired the services of some extension agents in the selected State. The State Directors directed them on how to get to the target individual respondents and standard women cooperative organisation that was used for the Focus Group Disussion.

Conducting a scheduled interview and Focus Group Discussion expecially with the female respondents, was quite tasking as most of them have to shuffle between their time for family chores for the rersearcher and her numerators. Therefore, time and money constraint were reconginzed as limitations to the study.

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.

Review


To Comment