COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF UTILIZATION OF ORTHODOX AND TRADITIONAL MEDICINE IN HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT AMONG RURAL FARM HOUSEHOLDS IN SOUTH-SOUTH, NIGERIA

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00009256

No of Pages: 198

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦10000

  • $

ABSTRACT

The study assessed the utilization of orthodox and traditional medicine in health-care management among rural farm households in South-South, Nigeria. The specific objectives were to: ascertain the health-care needs of farm households; determine the level of utilization of orthodox and traditional medicine, and examine the annual expenditure on orthodox and traditional medicine in health-care management among farm households, among others. A sample of 360 farm households was randomly selected through a multi-stage sampling technique. Primary data were collected through the use of structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Z-test and ANOVA were used to test the hypotheses. The result shows a prevalence of twelve illnesses in the study area with a grand mean score of (1.94). Respondents had low level of utilization for orthodox medicine and high level of utilization for traditional medicine with grand mean scores of (2.44) and (2.57). The respondents’ annual mean expenditure on orthodox medicine was N14, 331.30 compared to N5, 962.78 for traditional medicine. The Z-test showed a significant difference between the level of utilization of orthodox (2.444) and traditional (2.573) medicine with a Z- value of -3.271 at 5% level. Therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected. The Z-test also found a significant difference between the expenditure on orthodox and traditional medicine with a Z-value of 8.750. Therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected. Furthermore, the Z-test result found a significant difference between the farmers perception of the efficacy of orthodox and traditional medicine with a Z-value of 3.204 at 5% level. Therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected. The Z-test also showed a significant difference in respondents rating between the perceived factors affecting respondents’ utilization of orthodox and traditional medicine with a Z-value of 3.201 at 5% level, therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected. Moreover, ANOVA test showed significant difference in the levels of utilization of orthodox medicine across the three states with F-value of 6.654 at 5% level. Therefore the null hypothesis was rejected. Similarly, ANOVA test also showed significant differences in the level of utilization of traditional medicine across the three states with F-value of 16.105 at 5% level, therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected. Furthermore, the ANOVA test result also showed that significant differences existed in expenditure on orthodox medicine across the three states with an F-value of 6.161 at 5% level. Thus, the null hypothesis was rejected. Moreover, ANOVA test result also showed that significant differences existed in expenditure on traditional medicine across the three states with an F-value of 13.614 at 5% level, therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected. The study concluded that both orthodox and traditional medicines were utilized by farm households in South-South, Nigeria, but that the farmers were more favourably disposed to using traditional medicine than orthodox. It was recommended that Traditional medicine resource centres be established for people to start studying traditional medicine as a profession and policies be made to integrate traditional medicine into the mainstream of medical science, and that traditional medicine practitioners be empowered to function like the western medicine professionals.





TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page                                                                                                                    i

Declaration                                                                                                                 ii

Certification                                                                                                               iii

Dedication                                                                                                                  iv

Acknowledgements                                                                                                    v

Table of Contents                                                                                                       vi

List of Tables                                                                                                              xi

List of Figures                                                                                                             xiii

Abstract                                                                                                                      xiv

 

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION                                                                            1

1.1       Background of the Study                                                                                1

1.2       Statement of Problem                                                                                     7

1.3       Research Questions                                                                                        12

1.4       Objectives of the Study                                                                                  12

1.5       Hypotheses of the Study                                                                                 13

1.6       Justification for the Study                                                                               14

1.7       Scope of the Study                                                                                          15

1.8       Definition of Terms                                                                                        15

 

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW                                                               17

2.1       Conceptual Review                                                                                         19

2.1.1    The Nigerian health system.                                                                           19

2.1.2    Global pattern of medical pluralism                                                               20

2.1.3    Orthodox medical practice in Nigeria.                                                           23

2.1.4    Orthodox health-care delivery system in Nigeria                                          24

2.1.4.1 Types of orthodox health-care services                                                          28

2.1.5    Traditional medicine in Nigeria.                                                                    28

2.1.5.1 Concept of traditional medicine                                                                     30

2.1.5.2 History of traditional medicine                                                                      32

2.1.5.3 Traditional medicine development in Nigeria                                                33

2.1.5.4 Forms of traditional medicine practiced in Nigeria                                       37

2.1.5.4.1 Bone setting                                                                                                 37

2.1.5.4.2 Traditional birth attendants                                                                         38

2.1.5.4.3 Herbal medicine                                                                                          39

2.1.5.4.4 Traditional psychiatrist                                                                                39

2.1.5.4.5 Traditional surgeon                                                                                      40

2.1.5.5 Practitioners of therapeutic occultism.                                                           41

2.1.6    Medicinal plants                                                                                             42

2.1.6.1 The nature of medicinal plants                                                                       43

2.1.6.2 Maintenance of medicinal plant resources                                                     43

2.1.6.3 Efficacy of traditional medicine                                                                     44

2.1.7    Models of health-care                                                                                     47

2.1.7.1 The monopolistic health-care model                                                              47

2.1.7.2 The tolerant (co-existence) health-care model                                               48                   

2.1.7.3 The parallel (Inclusive) or dual health-care model                                        48                   

2.1.7.4 The integrative health-care model                                                                  48

2.1.7.5 The traditional model of health-care                                                              49

2.1.8    Accessibility and utilization of health services.                                             51

2.1.8.1 Accessibility                                                                                                   51

2.1.8.2 Utilization                                                                                                       55

2.1.9    Health seeking behaviour: approaches, problems and prospects in the

developing world.                                                                                           56

 

2.2       Empirical Studies on Health                                                                           59                               

2.3       Review of Related Theories.                                                                          64

2.3.1    Structural functionalism                                                                                 64

2.3.2    Modernization theory                                                                                     65

2.3.3    Gravity model                                                                                                 67

2.3.4    Rationale choice theory                                                                                  67

2.3.5    Health belief model                                                                                        69

2.3.6    Theoretical framework                                                                                   71

2.3.6.1 The behavioural model of health service utilization                                      71

2.4       Conceptual Framework                                                                                  74

 

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY                                                                          79

3.1       Study Area                                                                                                      79

3.2       Population of the Study                                                                                  83

3.3       Sample and Sampling Procedure                                                                    83

3.4       Data Collection                                                                                               85

3.5       Validity of Instrument                                                                                    86

3.6       Reliability of Instrument                                                                                86

3.7       Measurements of Variables                                                                            86

3.8       Data Analysis                                                                                                  88

3.9       Hypotheses Testing                                                                                        90

3.10     Model Specification                                                                                       91

 

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1       Socio-Economic Characteristics of the Respondents                                     95                   

4.1.1    Age of the respondents                                                                                   95

4.1.2    Marital status of the respondents                                                                    96

4.1.3    Household size of the respondents                                                                 97

4.1.4    Gender of the respondents                                                                              97

4.1.5    Farm size of the respondents                                                                          98

4.1.6    Farming experience of the respondents                                                          99

4.1.7    Respondents' level of education                                                                     99

4.1.10  Respondents’ annual farm income                                                                 100

4.1.11  Cooperative membership of the respondents                                                 101

4.2       Health-Care Needs of Farming Households in the Study Area                    105

4.3       Level of Utilization of Orthodox and Traditional Medicine by Farm

Households in the Study Area                                                                                    109

 

4.3.1    Level of utilization of orthodox medicine by farm households                   109

4.3.2    Level of utilization of traditional medicine by farm households in the

study area                                                                                                        112

 

4.4       Annual Expenditure Distribution on Orthodox and Traditional Medicine

in Health-Care Management among Farm Households in the Study Area    116

 

4.5       Perception of the Efficacy of Orthodox and Traditional Medicine in the

Study Area                                                                                                      120

           

4.5.1    Perception of the efficacy of orthodox medicine in the study area                        120

 

4.5.2            Perception of the efficacy of traditional medicine in the study area                        123                                                                                                         

 

4.6       Factors Affecting Farm Households’ Utilization of Orthodox and

Traditional Medicine in the Study Area                                                         127

 

4.6.1    Factors affecting farm households’ utilization of orthodox medicine in

South-South Nigeria                                                                                 127

 

4.6.2    Factors affecting farm households’ utilization of traditional medicine in

South-South Nigeria                                                                                 132

 

4.7       Constraints Associated with the Use of Orthodox and Traditional

Medicine in the Study Area                                                                            136

 

4.7.1    Constraints associated with the use of orthodox medicine by farm

households in South-South Nigeria                                                                136     

4.7.2    Constraints associated with the use of traditional medicine by farm

households in South-South Nigeria                                                          140

4.8       Hypotheses Testing                                                                                        144

4.8.1    Testing hypothesis 1                                                                                       144

4.8.2    Testing hypothesis 2                                                                                       145

4.8.3    Testing hypothesis 3                                                                                       146

4.8.4    Testing hypothesis 4                                                                                       147

4.8.5    Testing hypothesis 5                                                                                       148

4.8.6    Testing hypothesis 6                                                                                       150

4.8.7    Testing hypothesis 7                                                                                       152

4.8.8    Testing hypothesis 8                                                                                       154

 

CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS     157

5.1       Summary                                                                                                        157

5.2       Conclusion                                                                                                      161

5.3       Recommendations                                                                                          162

            References                                                                                                      164

           Appendices                                                                                                      181

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIST OF TABLES         

 4.1:     Distribution of respondents according to their socio-economic

characteristics                                                                                                 101

 

 4.2:     Mean score responses of the health-care needs of the respondents 

in the study area                                                                                              108

 

4.3:      Mean scores of the respondents on the level of utilization of orthodox

medicine for health-care management by farm households in the study

area                                                                                                                 111

 

 4.4:     Mean scores of the respondents on the level of utilization of traditional

medicine for health-care management by farm household in the study

area                                                                                                                 115

 

 4.5:     Annual expenditure distribution on orthodox and traditional medicine

in health-care management among farm households in the study area.    119

 

4.6:      Mean scores of the respondents’ perception of the efficacy of orthodox

health-care service                                                                                          122

 

4.7:      Mean scores of the respondents’ perception of the efficacy of traditional

health-care services                                                                                        126

 

 4.8:     Mean scores of the respondents on factors affecting respondents

utilization of orthodox health-care                                                                 131

 

 4.9:     Mean scores of the respondents on the factors affecting respondents

utilization of traditional health-care                                                               135     

 4.10:   Mean scores of the respondents on the constraints associated with the

use of orthodox medicine by farm households in South-South Nigeria            139

 

 4.11:   Mean scores of the respondents on the constraints associated with the use

of traditional medicine by farm households in South-South Nigeria                        143

 

 4.12:   Z-test analysis of difference between the levels of utilization of orthodox

and traditional medicine by the farm households in the study area                        144

 

4.13:    Z-test result of difference between the expenditure on orthodox and 

traditional medicine in health-care management among farm  households

in South-South, Nigeria                                                                                  146

 

 4.14:   Z-test result of difference between the farmers’ perception of the efficacy

of orthodox and traditional medicine in the study area                                  147

 

 4.15:   Z-test of difference in respondents’ rating between the perceived factors

influencing respondents’ utilization of traditional and orthodox medicine

by rural farm households in the study area                                                    148

 

4.16:    Result of ANOVA for test of difference in the levels of utilization of

orthodox medicine by the rural farm households across the three states in 

South-South, Nigeria                                                                                      149

 

 4.17:   Result of differences in the levels of utilization of orthodox medicine by

rural farm households among the three selected states using Post hoc 

multiple comparism test                                                                                 150

 

 4.18:   Result of Analysis of Variance of difference in the level of utilization of

traditional medicine by the farm households across the three South-South

States                                                                                                              151

 

4.19:    Result of differences in the levels of utilization of traditional medicine by

rural farm households among the three selected states using Post hoc

multiple comparism test                                                                                 152 

 

 4.20:   ANOVA result of difference in the expenditure on orthodox medicine in

health-care management among farm households across the three states

in the study area                                                                                              153

 

 4.21:   Result of differences in the expenditure on orthodox medicine by rural

farm households among the three selected states using Post hoc multiple

comparism test                                                                                                154

 

 4.22:   ANOVA test of difference between the expenditure on traditional medicine 

in health-care management among farm households across the three states

in South-South Nigeria                                                                                   155

 

4.23:    Result of differences in the expenditure on traditional medicine by rural

farm households among the three selected states using Post hoc multiple comparism test                                                                                             156  

 

 

                                                              

 

 

LIST OF FIGURES

1:       A conceptual framework for comparative assessment of the utilization

of orthodox and traditional medicine in health-care management among

rural farm household in South-South, Nigeria                                       78

 

2:         Map of Nigeria showing South-South region                                                 82

3:         Sampling procedure breakdown figure                                                          84       

                                                                                                                 

 

 

 


 

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

 

1.1       BACKGROUND OF STUDY

The value attached to good health cannot be overestimated. This is due largely to the fact that the sustainability and viability of any nation’s socio-economic growth depends on the vibrancy of her health sector (Orabuchi, 2005). In other words, the health sector forms the backbone of the growth and development of any economy. The dictums “Health is Wealth”, “A healthy nation is a wealthy nation”, etc are all indications of the importance that is universally attached to health (Alubo, 2010). Health, according to World Health Organization (2006), is defined as a dynamic state of complete physical, mental, spiritual and social wellbeing, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity. Health is also defined by Monique (2011) as the ability to adapt and self- manage oneself in the face of social, physical and emotional challenges.

Health-care, on the other hand, is defined as all the goods and services designated to promote health, including preventive, curative and palliative interventions, whether directed to individuals or population (Park, 2005). According to Free Dictionary (2016), health-care is defined as the prevention, treatment, and management of illness and the preservation of mental and physical wellbeing through services offered by the medical and allied health professionals. Wikipedia (2012) defines health-care as the maintenance or improvement of health via the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of diseases, illness, injury, and other physical and mental impairments in human beings. Health-care can majorly be classified into modern (conventional, orthodox, western or allopathic) and traditional (indigenous, complementary, alternative or integrative) groups (Omogbadegun et al, 2013). Health is the most precious of all things and is the foundation to all happiness. The health of a population is an essential element in its ability to progress and develop especially in an agrarian society like ours. The fact that three out of the eight Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) developed by the United Nations touched on health indicates that the importance of good health cannot be overemphasized (Ladele and Bisi-Amosun, 2014). It is, therefore a necessity and a basic need. To improve the health of the population in the developing world like ours, health services provided must be capable of addressing and meeting the health-care needs of the people.

Health-care needs is any physical, developmental, mental, sensory, behavioural, cognitive or emotional impairment or limiting conditions that require medical management, health-care intervention, and or use of specialized programme (Council of Clinical Affairs, 2008). They are those things human beings need in order to maintain, restore or provide functional equilibrium to normal species functioning (Andreas et al., 2006).

Health-care can be seen both as a consumption good and an investment good (Awoyemi and Sowunmi, 2009). As a consumption good, health-care improves welfare, and as an investment good, it improves the quality of human capital through the improvement of productivity and at the same time, increases the number of days available for productive activities. This is exemplified by the fact that healthier workers are physically and mentally more energetic and robust. They are more productive and earn more wages. They are also less likely to be absent from work because of illness (or illness of a family member). Labour hours and hourly wages are substantially reduced because of illness and this has a serious effect on an economy like ours, especially in the rural areas where 70% of the work force is engaged in manual labour in the farm (Awoyemi and Sowunmi, 2009).

In order to maintain a stable labour force in the rural farm households, the health conditions of the households should be properly managed. Management is described as the art of knowing what you want to do and seeing that it is done in the best and cheapest way. Health-care management is the profession that provides leadership and direction to the organizations that deliver personal health services, and to divisions, departments, units or services within these organizations (Lombardi and Schermerharn, 2007). Health-care can also be seen as that management that runs the health-care organization. Health-care management has to do with facility management.

For this study, health-care management has to do with the various ways in which the rural farm households manage their health, or treat themselves whenever they are sick, or perceive signs of ill-health. Do they use traditional, orthodox or other methods of health-care to treat themselves? Ill-health remains one of the threats to rural farm households and invariably to agricultural production in Nigeria. Asenso-okyere et al. (2011) posit that ill-health reduces physical strength and work days/hours available for the farm. Asenso-okyere et al. (2011) reports that poor health results in a loss of work days or in reduced workers capacity and this is likely to reduce output. Limited access to food may occur in a household if individuals are too ill or over-burdened to produce or earn money to buy food (Keverenge-Ettyang et al., 2010).

 

Ill-health has the following effect on farm households: being absent from work due to morbidity (and eventual death); precious family time diverted to caring for the sick, and loss of savings in dealing with the disease and its consequences (Asenso-okyere et al., 2009).  The long term effect of ill-health on farm households includes; loss of farming knowledge, reduction of land under cultivation, planting of less labour-intensive crops, reduction of varieties of crops planted, and reduction in the number of livestock. Ultimately, ill-health leads to a decline in households’ income which leads to severe deterioration in households’ livelihood (Asenso-Okyere et al. 2011b). As pointed out by the World Bank (2010), illness and death from HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis and other diseases reduce agricultural productivity through the loss of labour. Farming households with high medical expenditure may be deprived of resources to invest in experimentation on improved practices and adoption of new technology. Poor health reduces farmers’ ability to innovate, experiment and operationalize changes in agricultural systems (Asenso-Okyere et al., 2010).

Good health enhances the ability of the farming households to take risk on the new crops or farming methods that might pay off with better production and income (International Food Policy Research Institute, 2006). On the other hand, poor health inflicts great hardship on farming households such as substantial monetary expenditures, loss of labour, and sometimes death. As exemplified by the International Labour Organization (ILO, 2000), the agricultural sector is one of the most hazardous in terms of occupational hazards. Majority of farmers are usually exposed to harsh weather conditions, difficult working postures and lengthy hours of work due to the use of crude implements. Farm households usually have close contacts with plants, wild and domestic animals, as well as agricultural chemicals such as inorganic fertilizers, pesticides, etc., which predispose them to infections and illnesses (Olatunji, et al., 2013).

 

The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2002) estimates show that approximately three million people are poisoned, and two hundred people die from pesticide use annually. In Tanzania, a study reported that 68% of vegetable farmers who used pesticides were sick after routine pesticides application (Ngowi et al., 2007). Illnesses and diseases have adverse effect on agriculture and rural development, and this can be seen in the area of labour loss, farm income loss, as well as asset loss. From the foregoing, it can be seen that farmer’s health has significant effect on agricultural productivity. The health status of the adults affect their ability to work, and thus underpins the welfare of the households including children development (Asenso-Okyere et al., 2011). Ulimwengu (2009) indicated that healthy farmers were found to produce more per unit of input, earn more income, and supply more labour than farmers affected by sickness. It is also a known fact that production inefficiency increases significantly with the number of days lost to sickness. It was also found that a one percent improvement in a farmer’s health condition led to a 31% increase in efficiency (Ajani and Ugwu, 2008).

High efficiency in agricultural production as a result of good health is a form of development, and this development is only possible when there is access to health-care services, and in turn its effective utilization by individuals. According to Peters et al. (2008), access to health-care services is a multi-dimensional process involving the quality of care, geographical accessibility, availability of the right type of care for those in need, financial accessibility and acceptability of service. Utilization of health-care, on the other hand, is related to the availability, quality and cost of services, as well as socio-economic structure, and personal characteristics of the user (Chakraborty et al., 2003; Manzoor et al. 2009; Onah et al. 2009). Availability and accessibility of health services can make economic development sustainable. In many cases, when factors such as accessibility, availability and proper utilization of health-care services are denied, development can be stalled.

Health-care access and utilization are of major interest to rural development because they are vital elements of wellbeing and components of human capital (Aghion et al., 2010). Good health is a need for all and the choice of a particular health-care system responds to the laws of demand and supply; and demand for health is a derived demand in the sense that health-care is not demanded for itself but for the advantages that can be derived from being healthy (Titus et al., 2015).

Various countries have enunciated health-care policies directed towards the maintenance and improvement of the health status of their population, especially those living in the rural areas. This is borne out of the realization that good health-care is paramount for the wellbeing of the citizens and subsequently the socio-economic development of their various societies.

Nigeria has a dual system of health-care delivery – the officially recognized orthodox system and the barely tolerated traditional system. Traditional Medicine (TM) has been defined as the alternative or non-conventional mode of treatment often involving the use of herbs in a non-orthodox manner, as well as the process of consulting herbalists, mediums, priests, witch doctors, medicine men and various local deities when seeking a solution to diverse illnesses (Temitope and Ibrahim, 2014). Traditional medicine therapy for some ailment will cost very low or could even be free if the person could collect the medicinal plants and prepare the medicament himself (Mafimesebi and Oguntade, 2010). According to World Health Organization (2010) at least 80% of the people in developing countries depend largely on indigenous practice for the control and treatment of various diseases affecting both humans and animals, especially in the rural farming households.

Farming households comprise of all adult males, females, and children who partake in the cultivation of land and rearing of households’ livestock (Ojo and Akanji, 1996). The farming households are noted to be operating at low level of production with labour-intensive production technologies. Rural farm households who are labour suppliers in small-scale farming in Nigeria do not only lose valuable hours in treating sicknesses, but also lose income that would have been generated at the period.

 

1.2       PROBLEM STATEMENT

A major problem confronting Nigeria and other countries in sub-Saharan Africa is how to sustain our rural health-care delivery services. Increased agricultural productivity in any country depends on the health condition of the labour force. The agricultural sector is seen as one of the most hazardous in terms of occupational hazards as farmers are always and usually exposed to harsh weather conditions, difficult working postures, longer hours of work as a result of the use of crude implements. Farmers are always at risk of getting in contact with wild animals, agricultural chemicals and even inorganic fertilizers. All these predispose them directly or indirectly to disease infection and illnesses. This calls for proper health-care delivery system to be in place to address this issue. Unfortunately, very few low income countries, Nigeria inclusive, have not been able to meet the basic health-care needs of their citizenry, especially the rural dwellers. In Nigeria, there has been a growing recognition of the challenge of rural people health issues and the need for it to be addressed (Hamid et al., 2005).

 

Rural dwellers are subjected to high incidences of morbidity and mortality resulting from the prevalence of preventable parasitic and non-parasitic infectious diseases. About 70 percent of the working population is employed in the agricultural sector, which is a common phenomenon in developing countries like Nigeria, where access to good health care facilities is non-existent especially in the rural areas. High loses are recorded in agricultural production due to disease infections on the rural households. When the farmer or any member of the household is sick, they cannot go to the farm, so their farm activities are abandoned, also money that would have been used to purchase farm inputs, improved implements or hire tractors and labourers is used for treatments which leads to low productivity (Fanello and Baker, 2010). Women in the farming households suffering from diseases are less able to take part in farm work, thereby reducing the household income and savings (Kughur et al., 2015). The households lose valuable working hours to ill-health and this has serious implications on the rural farm families as it affects their productivity. This means income loss through the hire of additional labour to help in farm work, thus affecting the acquisition capacity and eventually poverty through the sick and caregivers to the households (Oluyole et al., 2011).

 

Effiong and Ebong (2009) estimated that rural farm households with diseases cleared only 40 percent as much land for crop production as similar households without disease. He further traced a variety of adjustments in households afflicted with diseases, including increase in labour input by healthy family members per unit of output, as well as reallocation may also increase the workload of healthy family members.

Unhealthy farm households are unable to produce enough agricultural goods to earn a decent livelihood and this consequently increases their poverty and malnutrition status which further worsens their health. According to Adesope et al. (2012), the annual income of the farm households decreases with increase in days of incapacitation because the more the number of days of incapacitation by farm households, the greater the loss incurred during treatment and the lesser the annual income. Ill-health constitutes a great burden on the already depressed farm households through its effect on the agricultural sector (Oladepo et al., 2010). The effect of a diseased household on agriculture is felt in two key farm parameters; first, a reduction in the labour quantity and quality, initially in terms of productivity when the disease infected person is ill, and later the supply of households labour will drop with the illness, and peradventure death of the person. At this point, other household members will devote production time to caring for the sick person (WHO, 2000). Secondly, the disposable household income will be affected as most of the income will be channeled into restoring the health of the sick. During this period, farm households’ financial resources would be diverted to pay for the medical bills at the expense of agricultural inputs (Kughur et al., 2015).

The relationship between health and agriculture is very important because a farm household with poor health will only attract low returns on investment, and increase the cost of financing or the cost of production. Good health affects agriculture by boosting peoples’ capacity to work and thus increasing how much they can produce. This, however, enhances their capacity to take risk in the areas of crops and livestock farming methods. 

Nigeria is still tagged with some of the worst health-care statistics in the world; this makes the country one of the least in virtually all development indexes (Tormusa and Idom, 2016). The World Health Organization (WHO) currently positions the Nigerian health system at the 197th place of 200 WHO countries evaluated. According to a report by the United Nation Development Commission (UNDP, 2008), life expectancy in Nigeria has declined drastically from 47 - 43 years.  Nigeria accounts for 10% of the world’s maternal mortality rate in child birth whereas it constitutes only 2% world’s population (WHO, 2015). One in every five Nigerian children dies before their 5th birthday, while over a million Nigerian children die from preventable diseases. The immunization records of Nigeria also show that only 18% of the Nigerian children receive full immunization by the first birthday (WHO, 2015). Malaria also kills the Nigerian child more than any other disease. Despite all these indices of poor health delivery services in the country, the Nigerian government at all levels, budget less than 5% on health, despite its signatory to the 2000 Abuja Declaration to increase health budget to 15%. Primary health-care centres are in disarray with structures adorned with ‘expired drugs and cobwebs’ (Hadi, 2015). All these has  effect on the rural farm households as the poorly developed health system makes it inaccessible for the farmers who most times lack the enabling resources for medi-care expenditure. It is as a result of this that the traditional medicine could be a possible alternative for the rural farm households.

Traditional medicine provides a wide range of medical services that orthodox medicine does not (Amangbey, 2014). It is effective as it is used in treating a lot of ailments such as malaria, jaundice, stroke, infertility, broken bones, typhoid fever, boils, piles, HIV/AIDS, as well as mental illness (Gyasi et al., 2011). No wonder the World Health Organization (WHO, 2002) reported that 70% of the population in developing world, especially Africa, depends on medicinal plants to meet their health-care needs. This is also supported by Adefolaju (2014) who estimated that about 86% of Nigerians still lack access to orthodox medicine and rely almost exclusively on traditional medicine. Increased attention on the traditional medicine is justified because it is accessible, easy to prepare and administer at little or no cost at all. Considering the strategic role of the rural farm households as a hob on which agricultural and food production strength of the country revolve on, these household needs to be in good health.

The inhabitants of the South-South region are not exempted as the region has been subjected to untold hardship and poverty stress through oil pollution, gas flaring, environmental degradation and other negative activities that are inimical to the health of man, in particular, and to the existence and survival of the rural farm households in the region as a result of oil exploration and exploitation-related hazards. This has contributed to the high rate of morbidity and mortality of the people of the region ranging from infant morbidity and mortality, maternal morbidity and mortality, as well as morbidity and mortality of other members of the farm households (Abimbola et al. 2012). In addition, disease incidences are higher in the rural areas because of higher level of illiteracy, poverty and ignorance (Oladoyinbo et al., 2013).                                                       

Orthodox and traditional medicines are acceptable methods of treating diseases, even in the rural areas of South-South, Nigeria. The prohibitive cost of accessing orthodox medicine appears to be a hindrance to the rural people in the zone in utilizing orthodox medicare. On the contrary, traditional medicine is not only seen as part of the culture of the people but is also easily accessible and more affordable to the rural poor population. However, with the government intervention in the provision of health-care centres in the rural areas which is expected to be easily accessible and affordable too, it is expected that more rural farmers in the zone would be able to utilize orthodox medicare contrary to what the situation had been hitherto. It is important to note too that, the type of ailment one suffers in the rural areas also influences whether the person would seek orthodox or traditional medical attention. From the scenario above, it is not yet clear whether the rural farm households in South-South, Nigeria are currently more inclined to the use of orthodox or traditional medicine in meeting their health-care needs. It is in this regard that the need to make a comparative assessment of the utilization of orthodox and traditional medicine among rural farm households in South-South, Nigeria, becomes worthwhile. The study, therefore, sought to provide answers to the following research questions:

 

1.3       RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The following research questions guided the study

1.     What are the socio-economic characteristics of the rural farmers in the study area?

2.     What are the health-care needs of rural farm households in the study area?

3.     What are the levels of utilization of orthodox and traditional medicine by rural farm households in the study area?

4.     What is the annual expenditure distribution on orthodox and traditional medicine among rural farm households in the study area?

5.     What are the farmers’ perceptions of the efficacy of orthodox and traditional medicine?

6.     What are the perceived factors affecting respondents’ utilization of orthodox and traditional medicine in the study area?

7.     What are the constraints associated with the use of orthodox and traditional medicine by farm households in the study area?

 

1.4       OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The broad objective of the study was the comparative assessment of utilization of orthodox and traditional medicine in health-care management among farm households in South-South, Nigeria. The specific objectives were to:

1.     describe the socio-economic characteristics of the rural farmers in the study area;

2.     ascertain the  health-care needs of rural farm households in the study area;

3.     determine the level of utilization of orthodox and traditional medicine by the rural farm households in the study area;

4.     examine the annual expenditure distribution on orthodox and traditional medicine in health-care management among rural farm households in the study area;

5.     ascertain the farmers’ perception of the efficacy of orthodox and traditional medicine in the study area;

6.     ascertain the perceived factors affecting respondents’ utilization of orthodox and traditional medicine in the study area; and

7.     ascertain the constraints associated with the use of orthodox and traditional medicine in health-care management by farm households in the study area.

 

1.5       HYPOTHESES

The following hypotheses for the study were tested

HO1: there is no significant difference between the level of utilization of orthodox and            traditional medicine by the farm households in the study area.

HO2: there is no significant difference between the expenditure on orthodox and traditional medicine in health-care management among farm households in the study area.

HO3: there is no significant difference between the farmers perception of the efficacy of orthodox and traditional medicine in the study area.

HO4: there is no significant difference in respondents’ rating between the perceived factors affecting respondents’ utilization of orthodox and traditional medicine in the study  area.

 

HO5: there is no significant difference in the level of utilization of orthodox medicine by the  rural farm households among the three selected states in South-South, Nigeria.

HO6: there is no significant difference in the level of utilization of traditional medicine by the  rural farm households among the three selected states in South-South, Nigeria

HO7: there is no significant difference in the expenditure on orthodox medicine in health- care management by rural farm households among the three selected states in the study area.

HO8:   there is no significant difference in the expenditure on traditional medicine in health-care management by rural farm households among the three selected states in the study area.

 

1.6       JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY

This study is justified on the basis that, it will bring to the fore the perceptions of respondents on the efficacy or otherwise of orthodox and traditional medicine as sources of health-care in the South-South region. This, of course, if properly ascertained would provide a platform for synergy between orthodox and traditional medicine.  Another justifiable point worth mentioning is that the study will determine the level of utilization of orthodox and traditional medicine, as well as identify the illnesses/diseases that are prevalent among the farm households in the study area. With this information, better policy statements can be made in favour of the rural farm families.

This study is also deemed relevant in the sense that not much research has been carried out on this subject area especially as it has to do with the South-South region. As such, the study will unearth various issues such as health seeking behaviour of the inhabitants of the South-South; establish the factors responsible for the decision to use traditional medicine in the region rather than modern medicine, among others. This study is justified by the fact that it will provide insight into rural health-care usage and the dynamics of rural health-care needs in the South-South region. Moreover, the research would be useful to both the Federal and State Ministries of Health, NGOs, and other international organizations in developing policies that would promote safe, effective, affordable and accessible health-care. Also, this study is significant in the view that it would contribute to the body of knowledge regarding operative mechanisms of both traditional and modern health-care systems. Hence, it could serve as the basis for further research into related areas.

 

1.7       SCOPE OF STUDY

The scope of the study covered the South-South region of Nigeria only. It was also delimited to the comparative assessment of the utilization of orthodox and traditional medicine in health-care management among rural farm households in South-South, Nigeria. The study equally ascertained the health-care needs, determined the level of utilization, examined the expenditure distribution, ascertained farmers’ perception of the efficacy, ascertained the factors influencing respondents’ utilization, as well as ascertained the constraints associated with the use of orthodox and traditional medicine by rural farm households in the study area.

 

1.8       DEFINITION OF TERMS

The following terms have been defined as they relate to the study,

Access: This refers to the ability of individuals to obtain required services at the right time and place.

Utilization: This means to put to use.

Health-care utilization: This means the use of either orthodox or traditional health-care by people.

Health seeking behaviour: This is how an individual seeks treatment for an illness he or she is already having.

 

Efficacy: This is a measure of a medicine ability to improve one’s health and well-being or cure one’s disease.

 

Traditional medicine: This is defined as the alternative or non-conventional mode of treatment often involving the use of herbs in a non-orthodox manner, as well as the process of consulting herbalists, mediums, priests, witch doctors, medicine men and various deities when seeking a solution to diverse illnesses. This definition by Temitope et al. (2014) is all embracing and hence adopted for this study.

 

Orthodox medicine: Orthodox medicine is defined as a professional discipline that relies on a body of knowledge, scientific training and skills aimed at diagnosing, prevention, treatment and rehabilitation of the physically and mentally sick (Okujagu, 2007).

 

Illness: This is any condition that dis-eases a persons’ system and puts some discomfort to the normal functioning of the body system.

 

Health-care needs: These are those things we need in order to maintain, restore or provide functional equilibrium to normal species functioning. It can also be seen as what one needs to do to overcome a health challenge.

 

Health-care management: For this study, health-care management has to do with the various ways, in which the rural farm household manages their health, or treat themselves whenever they are sick, or perceive signs of ill-health. Do they use traditional, orthodox or other method of health-care to treat themselves.

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.

Review


To Comment