ASSESSMENT OF AWARENESS AND UTILIZATION OF IMPROVED COCOYAM (XANTHOSOMA SAGITTIFOLIUM) PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES BY WOMEN FARMERS

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00009222

No of Pages: 106

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦5000

  • $

ABSTRACT

The study investigated the effects of improved cocoyam production technologies on the income and output of women farmers in Anambra State, Nigeria. The study described the socio-economic characteristics of the women farmers, identified the improved cocoyam production technologies, determine the extent of use of improved cocoyam production practices. Multi stage sampling technique was used in the selection of 160 respondents. Data were collected using structured questionnaire, interview schedule and Focus Group Discussion. The data collected were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics like percentage, mean, multiple regression and Z-test. The result of the analysis showed that a higher proportion (46.9%) of the farmers were within the age bracket of 41 – 50 years, literate (39.4%), household size of 6 – 10 people with farming experience of 11 – 15 years and visited once per month (51.2%) by extension workers. Farmers were members of social organization (36.9%), had a farm size of 1.1 – 2.0ha, did not obtain credit (59.4%). More of the farmers were aware and used most of the improved cocoyam production practices like harvesting method (54.4%), time of planting (57.5%), planting depth (53.1%), recommended plant spacing (58.8%), cocoyam mini setts technique (55.8%), cocoyam intercropping technique (61.3%) and method of fertilizer application (56.3%). The farmers’ major source of information on improved cocoyam production practices was through cooperative societies. The extent of use of the practices was high with an average mean score of 2.4 and an agreed mean perception of 3.0. The result of hypothesis I showed that the independent variables such as educational level (1.916), household size (3.636), farming experience (2.881) and membership of social organization (3.874) were significant with the farmers’ use of improved cocoyam production practices with an R2 value of 0.547 and 2.522 F-ratio. Hypothesis II showed that, the farmers’ perception of improved cocoyam production practices was significant at 1% level of probability. Hypotheses III and IV results of Z-test showed that, the improved cocoyam production practices by farmers increased their output significantly. Farmers’ use of improved cocoyam production practices was constrained by inadequate credit facilities (90.6%), pests and diseases (81.3%), declining soil fertility (78.9%) and weeds menace (67.5%). It was recommended that more credit facilities should be made available to farmers by government. Also, extension education, campaign programmes should be carried out by agricultural extension department to tackle the problems of pests and diseases, declining soil fertility and weed menace in order to sustain the farmers’ use of improved cocoyam production practices.






TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title page                                                                                                                                i

Declaration                                                                                                                             ii

Certification                                                                                                                           iii

Dedication                                                                                                                              iv

Acknowledgments                                                                                                                  v

Table of Contents                                                                                                                   vi

List of Tables                                                                                                                          ix

List of figures                                                                                                                         x

Abstract                                                                                                                                  xi

 

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1       Background Information                                                                                            1

1.2       Problem Statement                                                                                                     4

1.3       Objectives of the Study                                                                                              6

1.4           Hypotheses of the Study                                                                                             7

1.5       Justification of the Study                                                                                            7

1.6       Scope and limitations of the Study                                                                             8

 

CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1       Origin and Spread of Cocoyam                                                                                  10

2.1.2    Ecology/cultivars of cocoyam                                                                                    10

2.2       Economic Importance of Cocoyam                                                                            11

2.2.1    Nutritional values of cocoyam                                                                                   12

2.3       Empirical Findings on the Socio-economic Characteristics of Farmers                       16

2.4       Socio-economic Characteristics of Cocoyam Farmers in Anambra State                18

2.4.1    Sex                                                                                                                              19

2.4.2    Age                                                                                                                             19

2.4.3    Household size                                                                                                            20

2.4.4    Education                                                                                                                    21

2.4.5    Membership of social organizations                                                                           22

2.5       Awareness of Technological Innovation                                                                    22

2.6       Concept of Technology                                                                                              23

2.7       The Concept of Perception                                                                                         25

2.7.1    Farmers’ perception of technologies                                                                          27

2.8       Factors Influencing Farmers’ Decision to Use Improved Technologies               28

2.9       Meaning of Innovation                                                                                               31

2.9.1    The innovation decision process                                                                                32

2.10     Improved Cocoyam Production Technologies                                                           33

2.10.1  Method of fertilizer application                                                                                 34

2.11     Reasons for Farmers’ Acceptance and Non-acceptance of Farm Technologies  36

2.12     Constraints to Farmers’ Use of Improved Cocoyam Production Technology     39

2.12.1  Social change theory                                                                                                  41

2.12.2  Adoption and diffusion perspectives                                                                          42

2.13     Conceptual Framework                                                                                              43

 

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY

3.1       The Study Area                                                                                                           46

3.2       Sample and Sampling Procedure                                                                                47

3.3       Method of Data Collection                                                                                         48

3.4       Standardization of Instrument                                                                                    49

3.5       Measurement of Variables                                                                                          50

3.5       Method of Data Analysis                                                                                            52

 

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1       Socio-economic Characteristics of the Respondents                                                 55

 

4.2       Distribution of the Respondents based on the Awareness of Improved

Cocoyam Production Technologies                                                                           59

 

4.3       Distribution according to Rural Farmers’ Use of Improved Cocoyam

Production Technologies                                                                                            61

 

4.4       Sources of Information on Improved Cocoyam Production Technologies

among Farmers                                                                                                           62

 

4.5       Mean Response of Rural Farmers’ Extent of Use of Improved Cocoyam

Production Practices                                                                                                   63

 

4.6       Mean Response of Rural Farmers’ Perception of Improved Cocoyam Production  64

 

4.7       Distribution of Respondents according to Farmers Perceived Constraints                  66

 

4.8       Socio-Economic Determinants of Farmers’ Use of Improved Cocoyam

Production Technologies                                                                                            68

 

4.9       Ordinary Least Square Regression Table of the test of relationship

between farmers’ perception and the use of improved cocoyam technology                  72

 

CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1       Summary                                                                                                                     73

5.2       Conclusion                                                                                                                  74

5.3       Recommendations                                                                                                      75

References                                                                                                                  76

Appendices                                                                                                                 85


 





LIST OF TABLES

3.1       Population of the Study                                                                                              48

 

4.1       Socio-economic characteristics of the respondents                                                    55

 

4.2       Distribution of the respondents based on the awareness of improved

cocoyam production technologies                                                                              59

 

4.3       Distribution according to rural farmers’ use of improved cocoyam

production technologies                                                                                             61

 

4.4       Sources of information on improved cocoyam production technologies

among farmers                                                                                                            62

 

4.5       Mean response of rural farmers’ extent of use of improved cocoyam

production practices                                                                                                   63

 

4.6       Mean response of rural farmers’ perception of improved cocoyam production       64

 

4.7       Distribution of respondents according to farmers perceived constraints                   66

 

4.8       Socio-economic determinants of farmers’ use of improved cocoyam

production technologies                                                                                             68

 

4.9       Ordinary least square regression table of the test of relationship

between farmers’ perception and the use of improved cocoyam technology                  72

 

 

 





 

LIST OF FIGURES

2.1       Conceptual framework showing the effect of utilization of

improved cocoyam technologies by women farmers in Anambra State                45

 

3.1       Map of Anambra State showing the 21 local government areas and

their headquarters                                                                                                       47

 


 






CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1       BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Cocoyam (Xanthosoma) originated from Asia and about forty (40) species are mostly grown in West Africa (Asumugha and Mbanasor, 2002). Cocoyam, both Xanthosoma species and Colocasia species belong to the family (Aracea). The cocoyam specie Colocasia esculata in sub-Sahara Africa was introduced to this continent one thousand or more years ago from South East Asia while cocoyam specie Xanthosoma mafafa was introduced more recently from tropical America (11TA, 1992; FAO, 2005a).

 

Nigeria is the largest producer of cocoyam in the world, accounting for about 37% of the total world output (FAO, 2007b; NRCRI, 2009). From 0.73 million metric tons in 1990, cocoyam production in Nigeria rose to 3.89 million metric tons in 2000 (Ojiako et al., 2007) and further by 30.30% to 5.068 million metric tons in 2007 (FAO, 2007b). Further estimate in Nigeria, showed a figure of 5,387 million metric tons out of 11.77 million metric tons of world output of cocoyam per annum since 2008 (FAO STAT, 2010). Agriculture has been an important sector in the Nigerian economy for the past decades and still a major sector despite the oil boom (Central Bank of Nigeria, 2014). The sector remains a family enterprise in Nigeria, as farmers are involved in one way or the other in the agricultural production practices.

 

Basically, it provides employment opportunities for the teeming population, reduces poverty and contributes to the growth of the economy. Also, agricultural production is largely in the hands of resources-poor farmers and the characteristics of these farmers predispose them to low productivity (Adeniji, 2002). The problem of inadequate production, low food and raw materials supply led to innovation of improved technologies in order to improve production and living standard of farmers. Implications raised by this is that, concerted efforts by everybody that has potential contribution towards agricultural development process is required if Nigeria is to make a realistic and positive step. This is because, majority of the farmers‟ population in Nigeria depend entirely on farming activities for survival and generation of income or depend on these activities to supplement their main sources of income.

 

Productive gains in farming activities should be utilized for economic development. The non-availability or inadequate use of modern agricultural technologies followed by low resource endowment of the poor farmers has made Nigerian agriculture to remain rudimentary and traditional (Adeniji, 2002). Any crucial development policy aimed at poverty alleviation should concentrate on farming which is the main occupation of the poor because, the nation’s agricultural potentials are far from being fully realized and this has serious implications on food security and sustainable economic development. The underdevelopment of agriculture is indeed worrisome, given the fact that Nigeria is naturally and agriculturally endowed. In spite of the various food crop production programmes embarked upon by the Federal government of Nigeria, there has been growing concern about the capability of Nigerian agriculture to satisfy the food requirement of a fast-growing population (International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, 2013) and to provide enough raw materials for the agro-based industries.

 

Emphasis therefore, is placed on production of root and tuber crops like cocoyam, which has the potentials of alleviating poverty by improving the income earning capacity and food security of farmers in Nigeria. Root and tuber crops are among the most important groups of staple foods in many tropical African countries which constitute the largest source of calories for the Nigeria population (Olaniyan et al., 2013). Among the root crops, cocoyam is the next in importance after cassava and yam before sweet potato (National Root Crops Research Institute, 2012). Nigeria, Ghana and Japan are the world’s leading producers of cocoyam (Ogunniyi, 2008; Food and Agriculture Organization, 2014).

 

The two varieties of cocoyam that are mainly produced in Nigeria according to Obiora and Ajala (2014) and NRCRI (2012) are Colocasia esculenta otherwise known as “taro” and Xanthosoma saggittifolium also known as “tannia”. Both are members of Araceae family. Specifically, the two (Xanthosoma sagittifolium and Colocasia esculenta) varieties of cocoyam are cultivated in Southern Nigeria. Although, many different cultivars of each of these varieties exist in the zone, some of these cultivars are grown under different local names in different parts of the zone. In Anambra State for instance, both varieties are preferred but, in Cross River and Delta States, Xanthosoma is preferred to Colocasia (Okoye et al., 2012).

 

Cocoyam is most widely grown in both western and eastern regions of Nigeria in terms of area cultivated and number of producers. It is not only a major source of food but also income generating crop, especially in the rural areas (Ogunniyi, 2008). Cocoyam grows in association with other food and tree crops, a system mostly practiced by subsistence farmers in Nigeria. There was a decline in the yields of cocoyam in the past few years as reported by National Agricultural Extension and Research Liaison Services in 2011. This was due to the inadequacy of facilities of storage and transport which made it difficult to market fresh cocoyam at long distance from the place where it was grown. In practice therefore, reasonable cocoyam harvesting takes place between November and March/April, but the poor storage facilities, insufficient planting materials, weeds problem and poor soil result to low productivity in cocoyam (FAO, 2011).

 

National Root Crops Research Institute, Umudike and extension agencies provided research-based information on improved cocoyam production practices. The efforts have been supported with the use of extension publications. The improved cocoyam production practices that have been developed and transferred to farmers over time which the research examined are cocoyam intercropping technique, cocoyam mini setts technique, method of fertilizer application, plant spacing, planting depth (15 – 20cm deep), weed control method, mulching, pest control, time of planting and harvesting method (NRCRI, 2013). The study was undertaken to investigate whether the rural women farmers of Anambra State were actually aware of the improved cocoyam technologies and if they were aware to ascertain whether these technologies had actually been used by these women and the level of the usage.

 

1.2       PROBLEM STATEMENT

Food security is known to be critical to human development, however, Nigeria is not food secure (Adepoju and Awodunmuyila 2008). Little wonder therefore, that the clarion call to achieve food security in Nigeria has attracted a pitiable urgent attention for a state of emergency in the Nigerian food industry. This has generated increased interest in research, production, marketing, and consumption of cocoyam which is one major staple food among rural and urban dwellers (Okoye, Asumgha and Mbanaso, 2006). Cocoyam is not commonly found in most markets like other root and tuber crops such as cassava, yam and sweet potato. Besides, cocoyam is regarded as a crop mainly for the poor and has played a very minor role in international trade. As noted by Zubair and Hunter (2000), the cultivation of cocoyam is not encouraging as the yield per hectare is still low. One of the reasons for the low yield may not be unconnected to dismal and little attention farmers give to cocoyam when compared with cassava and yam that are close substitute root/tuber crops.

 

According to NRCRI (2003), the ignorance of the nutritive value and diversities of the food forms from cocoyam by a large percentage of the populace is a major limiting factor to general acceptability and extensive production of the crop. Expansion in cocoyam production has the potential of bridging the widening demand and supply gap for the product, and enhancing the income and standard of living of the farmers, particularly the vulnerable group (Amusa et al., 2011). As population pressure on land continues to increase, the importance of cocoyam in ensuring household food security should be given adequate recognition, and efforts to increase production of the crop through encouraging the adoption of modern production strategies and mitigation of production constraints such as climate change, drought, poor cultural practices among cocoyam growers, pest and disease infestations and lagging interest of youths in agriculture (Sagoe, 2006; Onwubuya and Ajani, 2012) must be stepped up.

 

This misconception has lingered for so long because of lack of appreciation of the number of people who depend on this crop and the number of lives that have been saved during famine or disasters by the crop. Also, very little research attention has been given to it occasioning knowledge gap for policies and programmes. As a result, the production of cocoyam in Nigeria can gradually go into extinction if adequate measures are not urgently put in place to arrest this ugly situation. This study which analyzed the effect of utilization of improved cocoyam production technologies on the output and income of women farmers in Anambra state, Nigeria was undertaken to address the following research questions:

      i.         What are the socio-economic characteristics of rural cocoyam farmers in Anambra state, Nigeria?

     ii.         Are the rural farmers’ aware of improved cocoyam production technologies?

   iii.         What are the improved cocoyam production technologies used by rural farmers?

   iv.         What are the sources of information on the improved cocoyam production technologies to farmers?

     v.         What is the extent of rural farmers’ use of improved cocoyam production technologies?

   vi.         What is the rural farmers’ perception of improved cocoyam production technologies?

  vii.         What are the constraints to rural farmers’ use of improved production technologies?

 

1.3       OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The broad objective of this study is to analyze the effects of improved cocoyam technologies by women farmers in Anambra State, Nigeria. The specific objectives were to:

      i.         describe the socio-economic characteristics of the famers in the study area;

     ii.         ascertain the rural farmers’ awareness of improved cocoyam production technologies;

   iii.         identify the improved cocoyam production technologies used by the farmers;

   iv.         identify sources of information on the improved cocoyam production technologies among cocoyam farmers;

     v.         determine the extent of rural farmers’ use of improved cocoyam production technologies;

   vi.         determine the rural farmers’ perception of improved cocoyam production technologies and

  vii.         identify the constraints to rural farmers’ use of improved cocoyam production technologies.

 

1.5  HYPOTHESES OF THE STUDY

Ho1:     Socio-economic characteristics of cocoyam farmers do not significantly influence the use of improved cocoyam production technologies.

Ho2:     There is no significant difference between the farmers’ perceptions of improved production cocoyam technologies and their use

 

1.5       JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY

Most of the scholars who wrote on cocoyam concentrated on marketing and profit efficiency of cocoyam (Adepoju and Awodunmuyila, 2008). Also, in most markets in the state, it is always noticeable that cocoyam featured least among other root and tuber crops (yam, cassava and sweet potato) and by looking through past researches on root and tuber crops, cocoyam has received the least research attention, therefore, this study would provide an understanding of the farmers’ attitude towards the crop in Anambra State, in terms of improved production practices. It will also help to explain how the improved cocoyam production technologies have been spread among the rural farmers of Anambra state, Nigeria. It would help the rural farmers to know the significance of using improved cocoyam production technologies and also assist them to improve their cocoyam production and income level.

 

The study would also be useful to the government of Nigeria, as a basis for rational and empirical policy formulation for cocoyam production in the country. Similarly, research institutes would be provided with the basic information on the constraints to farmers’ use of improved cocoyam production technologies by identifying problem areas for improvements. This study would reveal numerous nutritional benefits of cocoyam to consumers and producers thereby, making the crop acceptable in local and international markets. Finally, it is hoped that this work would be of assistance to future researchers who may identify other areas of cocoyam farming for further studies.

 

1.6       SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

The study covered all the agricultural zone in Anambra State. The study analyzed the socio-economic characteristics of the farmers among which are age, educational level, household size, membership of social organization, farm size and farming experience. Other variables include extension visits to farmers, credit obtained, marital status and sex. The scope of the study also covered farmers’ awareness, perception, types of practices used and extent of use of improved cocoyam production technologies by farmers and among others.

 

The study is limited to Anambra State of Nigeria. The researcher faced the challenge of transportation to the rural farmers in other to administer the questionnaire and the challenge of the unfriendly attitude of the ADP Staff during the gathering of data.


Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.

Review


To Comment