ABSTRACT
The study was conducted to investigate the performance, welfare indices, and faecal microbial load of broiler chickens reared under different litter management. A total of ninety (90) day-old Ross broiler chicks were purchased from reputable hatchery from the South Western part of Nigeria for the experiment. The birds were divided into three groups and randomly assigned to three management treatments designated T1, T2, and T3. The groups of birds were sub-divided into three replicates each. The birds were fed with commercial feed of 22% crude protein, and 3000 Kcal/g metabolizable energy at the starter phase and 19% crude protein and 3150 Kcal/g ME at the finisher phase. The three management groups were T1 (No change of litter), T2 (7 days interval litter change) and T3 (14 days interval litter change). The parameters measured included; growth performance, dust-bathing behaviour, foot pad lesion, breast pad lesion, faecal microbial load and carcass characteristics. There were no significant (p>0.05) differences in the growth performance across the treatment means. The bacteria isolates were higher (p<0.05) in T1 than in T2 and T3, while the protozoa isolates were higher (p<0.05) in T1 and T3 than in T2. The relative weight of gizzard was higher in T3 than in T1 and T2. T1 (No litter change) encouraged dust-bathing than was observed in T2 and T3. Birds on T1 did not have both foot pad and breast blister lesions compared with those on T2 and T3 that had slight lesions. In conclusion, litter management did not indicate any difference in the growth performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. However, a no litter change throughout the 8weeks of broiler rearing seem to have favoured broiler’s welfare in terms of more frequency of dust-bathing, as well as less incidence of foot pad and breast blister lesions.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
Page
|
i
|
Declaration
|
ii
|
Certification
|
iii
|
Dedication
|
iv
|
Acknowledgement
|
v
|
Table of
Contents
|
vi
|
List of
Tables
|
ix
|
List of
Figures
|
x
|
Abstract
|
xi
|
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
|
|
1.1
Background of Information
|
1
|
1.2 Objectives of Study
|
2
|
1.3 Problem Statement
|
3
|
1.4 Justification of the study
|
3
|
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW
|
|
2.1 Litter
Management
|
4
|
2.2 Factors considered when managing litter
|
7
|
2.3 Carcass Characteristics
|
9
|
2.4 Effects of ammonia on performance of
broiler chickens
|
10
|
2.5 Effects of litter management on
dust-bathing
|
10
|
2.6 Effects of litter management on breast and
foot pad lesion
|
11
|
2.7 Microbial loads in litter management
|
11
|
CHAPTER 3: MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|
3.1 Experimental
Location
|
13
|
3.2 Experimental
birds and management
|
13
|
3.3 Experimental Design
|
14
|
3.4 Data
Collection
|
14
|
3.4.1
Growth performance
|
14
|
3.4.2
Dust-Bathing Behaviour
|
15
|
3.4.3
Faecal Microbial Loads
|
15
|
3.4.4
Carcass Characteristics
|
15
|
CHAPTER
4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
|
|
4.1 Effect of litter management on growth
performance of broiler chickens
|
16
|
4.2
Effect of litter management on frequency of dust-bathing behaviour of
broiler chickens
|
18
|
4.3 Effect of litter management on foot pad
lesion of broiler chickens
|
18
|
4.4 Effect
of litter management on breast lesion of broiler chickens
|
21
|
4.5 Effect of litter management on the
faecal microbial load of the broiler chickens
|
23
|
4.6 Effect of litter management on carcass
characteristics of broiler chickens
|
24
|
CHAPTER
5: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
|
|
5.1 Conclusion
|
27
|
5.2 Recommendation
|
27
|
REFERENCES
|
28
|
LIST OF TABLES
Table
|
|
Page
|
4.1
|
Effect of litter management on the growth performance of broiler
chickens
|
17
|
4.2
|
Effect of litter
management on the faecal microbial load of broiler chickens
|
24
|
4.3
|
Effect of litter management on the Carcass characteristics of broiler
chickens
|
26
|
LIST
OF FIGURES
Figure
|
|
Page
|
4.1
|
Effect of litter
management on Frequency of Dust-bathing behaviour of broiler chickens
|
19
|
4.2
|
Effect of litter management on foot pad lesion of broiler chickens
|
20
|
4.3
|
Effect of litter management on breast lesion of broiler chicken
|
22
|
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
In
commercial broiler production, birds are reared on floors using different types
of litter material. As poultry production increases, the amount of litter
required by the system also increases. Consequently, both litter management and
disposal raise important challenges to the poultry industry, and a major
parameter is its economy. Litter is composed of bedding material which are
mixed with faeces, feed, feathers and water. Its moisture and quality content
have been associated with health and performance as well as with broiler
welfare, as it should reduce the floor humidity while giving the sense of
comfort and allowing natural scratching behaviour (Karamanlis et al., 2008; Skrbic et al., 2012). Litter also help in
thermal insulation, moisture absorption, and reduction of ammonia emissions and
serves as a protective barrier from the ground (Bjedov et al., 2013). Litter quality may be the origin of environmental
and management problems in the commercial poultry industry if not properly
selected or managed (Karamanlis et al.,
2008; Garcia et al., 2010). In
broilers, poor growth performance, compromised immune system, and increased
incidence of breast burns and blisters, leg abnormalities and footpad
dermatitis have been reported in the literature due to litter condition
(Bilgili et al., 1999; Garcia et al., 2010). Ideally, the bedding
material has to be absorbent, have a reasonable drying time, and be innocuous
to poultry and farmers (Grimes et al.,
2007). It also needs to meet hygienic requirements and ensure controlled
ammonia concentrations throughout the productive cycle (Villagra et al., 2011). Litter management is a
major concern in the chicken production not only because of the flock health
and productivity, but it may act as potential reservoir and transmission
vehicle for pathogens and potential pathogens (Bilgili et al., 2006; Bjedov et al.,
2013; Garcês et al., 2013). In
seeking increased performance of the poultry, the industry is also concerned
with consumer confidence in the food supply chain, thereby endorsing several
studies on the management of the litter to reduce the presence of pathogenic
bacteria and to improve broiler productive traits. Content may also contribute
to improving the competence of the immune system of the birds (Lee et al., 2011). Litter management can
significantly affect the efficiency of the broiler immune system and therefore
its growth performance.
The
aim of this study is to evaluate the performance, welfare indices, and faecal microbial
load of broiler chicken under different litter management.
1.2
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The
specific objectives of this study are to;
v Determine the effect of litter management on
growth performance of broiler chickens.
v Determine the effect of
litter management on number of dust-bathing behaviour of broiler chickens.
v Determine
the effect of litter management on and foot pad and breast lesion of broiler
chickens.
v Determine
the effect of litter management on faecal microbial load of broiler chickens
v Determine
the effect of litter management on carcass characteristics of broiler chickens.
1.3
PROBLEM
STATEMENT
Poultry
farmers are generally faced with the challenges of diseases which could be
traced to wet litter. Poor management of litter will result in wet or ammonia
accumulation in litter which will result in poor growth performance and
diseases outbreak such as coccidiosis, and respiratory tract infection of the
birds. With this problem, there will be high rate of mortality which may result
in great economic loss to poultry farmers.
1.4 JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY
Most
poultry farmers are generally faced with the challenges of proper litter
management which affect the performance of the birds. For poultry farmers to
make profit the optimum performance of the birds is necessary. A lot of factors
influence the optimum performance of the birds of which litter management is
one of them. Birds raised on properly managed (dry) litter may perform better than
those ones on wet litters. Hence, this study becomes important as it will
address issues surrounding litter management for profitability of broilers
production.
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment