COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INVESTMENT AND PERFORMANCE OF MODERN AND TRADITIONAL RICE PROCESSING ENTERPRISES IN NORTH CENTRAL NIGERIA

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00009174

No of Pages: 237

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦10000

  • $

ABSTRACT

The study comparatively analyzed the investment and performance of modern and traditional rice processing enterprises in North-Central Nigeria, from 1987-2016. Specifically, the study examined the features of modern and traditional rice processing enterprises; ascertained the relationship between capacity installation, utilization and un-utilized in modern and traditional rice processing; identify factors influencing capacity utilization; analyzed determinants of investment and performance in modern and traditional rice processing; examined the effect of investment on performance in modern and traditional rice processing; assess the performance of modern and traditional rice enterprises; and identified the factors militating the adoption of the modern technology of processing rice. The population size of 300 (250 traditional and 50 modern) respondents were drawn from the registration list of the National Association of Rice Processors Entrepreneurs of Nigeria. A sample size of 199 was drawn from a population of registered enterprises using Taro Yamane (1967) formula. Secondary data were used for the study. Structured questionnaire were used to collect primary data on features of rice processing enterprises. While secondary data were used on capacity installation, utilization and un-utilized in modern and traditional rice processing enterprises from 1987-2016. Data collected were analyzed with Descriptive Statistics, Correlation Analysis, Auto-regression Distributed Lagged model, Stochastic Trans-log Frontier, Ordinary Least Square (OLS) regression, Chow-Test and Z-test Statistics, Feasibility and Viability analysis as well as Performance analysis. The result showed majority (60 & 65%) of modern and traditional rice processing enterprises to have existed for 30 years. Majority (89%) of the modern rice processing entrepreneurs were males while 80% of the traditional rice processing entrepreneurs were female. The correlation result showed a positive coefficient (0.983**) implying a significant relationship between capacity installation, utilization and un-utilized in modern and traditional rice processing enterprises. The study identified inadequate supply of paddy, unavailability of paddy and poor electricity supply as factors influencing capacity utilization of enterprises. The performance of both enterprises was above 50% average, however the z-test (16.960***) showed significant at 1% difference in performance of modern and traditional rice enterprises. The chow-test (7.23) result showed a significant effect of investment on performance of modern and traditional rice enterprises. The study identified high cost of establishment; high cost of maintenance; high tax on importation of spare parts and unfavorable loan conditions as factors militating the adoption of modern technology of rice processing. The study conclude that modern and traditional rice processing enterprises were underutilized, though they performed above average of 50% which is feasible and viable for investment. The study therefore recommend that Paddy producers should increase production of paddy to ensure maximum utilization of the rice processing enterprises. Government should ensure adequate supply of electricity to power rice processing enterprises to reduce processing price. The rice processors should select an operational price at which the marginal revenue equal marginal cost (MR=MC) for sustainability of the enterprises.

 






TABLE OF CONTENTS  

                                                                                                                                                   

Title page                                                                                                                                i

Certification                                                                                                                            ii

Declaration                                                                                                                             iii

Dedication                                                                                                                               iv

Acknowledgement                                                                                                                  v

Table of Contents                                                                                                                   vi

List of Tables                                                                                                                          xi

List of Figures                                                                                                                         xiii

Abstract                                                                                                                                   xiv

 

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1           Background of the Study                                                                                            1

1.2           Statement of the Problem                                                                                           7

1.3           Objective of the Study                                                                                                12

1.4           Hypotheses                                                                                                                 13

1.5           Significance of the Study                                                                                           13

1.6           Scope of the Study                                                                                                      18

 

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1       Conceptual Framework                                                                                             19

2.1.1    Concept of investment                                                                                               19

2.1.2    Concept of performance                                                                                            23

2.1.3    Concept of enterprise                                                                                                28

2.1.4    Concept of entrepreneur                                                                                            32

2.1.5    Capacity installation                                                                                                  35

2.1.6    Capacity utilization                                                                                                   35

2.1.7    Capacity unutilized                                                                                                    36

2.2       Theoretical framework                                                                                               36

2.2.1    Theory of economic development                                                                             36

2.2.2    Theory of investment                                                                                                41

2.2.3    Theory of performance                                                                                               44

2.3       Empirical Review                                                                                                      46

2.3.1    Relationship between capacity installation, capacity utilization and capacity

unutilization of modern and traditional rice processing mills                                  46

2.3.2    Relationship between capacity utilization and capacity unutilization of

modern and traditional rice processing mills                                                             48

2.3.3    Factors influencing capacity utilization of mills in modern and traditional

rice processing enterprises                                                                                         56

2.3.4    Determinants of investment and performance among modern and traditional

rice processing enterprises                                                                                         61

2.3.5    Feasibility and viability of investment and performance of modern and traditional

rice processing enterprises                                                                                         63

2.3.6    Estimation of performance of modern and traditional rice processing enterprises 66

2.3.7    Effect of investment on performance of modern and traditional rice

processing enterprises                                                                                                70

2.4       Analytical Framework                                                                                               78

2.4.1    Descriptive statistics                                                                                                  78

2.4.2    Correlation analysis                                                                                                    79

2.4.3    Factor analysis                                                                                                           80

2.4.4    Auto-regression distributed lagg                                                                               80

2.4.5    Stochastic trans-log frontier production function                                                      81

2.4.6    Feasibility and viability analysis                                                                               81

2.4.7    Performance analysis                                                                                                 81

2.4.8    (OLS) regression analysis                                                                                         82

2.4.9    Solvency ratio                                                                                                             82 2.4.10         Break even analysis                                                                                                   82

2.4.11  Financial feasibility analysis                                                                                     82

2.4.12  Benefit cost ration (BCR)                                                                                          83

2.4.13  Internal rate of return                                                                                                 83

2.4.14  Payback period (PBP)                                                                                                84

2.4.15  Profitability index (PI)                                                                                               84

2.4.16 Sensitivity analysis                                                                                                     84

2.4.17  Break even analysis                                                                                                   84

2.4.18  Profitability analysis                                                                                                  85

 

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY

3.1       Research Design                                                                                                        86

3.2       Study Area                                                                                                                 86

3.3       Sampling Procedure                                                                                                  87

3.4       Data Collection Technique                                                                                        89

3.5       Method of Data Analysis                                                                                           89

3.6       Model Specification                                                                                                  90

3.6.2    Correlation analysis                                                                                                   90

3.6.3    Factor analysis                                                                                                           92

3.6.4    Investment model                                                                                                      93

3.6.5    Feasibility and viability analyses of modern and traditional rice processing

enterprises                                                                                                                   96

3.6.6    Performance analysis.                                                                                                98

3.6.7    Ordinary least squares (OLS) model                                                                         100

3.6.8    Factor analysis model                                                                                                102

 

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1       Features of Modern and Traditional Rice Processing Enterprises                                    103

4.1.2    Features of modern and traditional rice processing entrepreneurs                                    107

4.2       Relationships between Capacity installation, Capacity utilization and Capacity

unutilized of Modern and Traditional Rice Processing Mills                                     113

4.2.1    Correlate between capacity installation, capacity utilization and capacity

unutilized of modern rice processing enterprise mills.                                               113

4.2.2:   Trend analysis of capacity installation, capacity utilization and capacity

unutilized of modern rice processing enterprise mills from 1987 -2016                115

4.2.3    Correlate between capacity installation, capacity utilization and capacity

unutilized of traditional rice processing enterprise mills.                                          117

4.2.4:   Trend analysis of capacity installation, capacity utilization and capacity

unutilized of traditional rice processing enterprise mills from 1987 -2016               119

4.2.5:   Z-test statistics computation of significant difference in capacity installation of

modern and traditional rice processing enterprise mills                                            121

4.2.6:   Comparative analysis of the trend in capacity installation of modern and

traditional rice processing enterprise mills from 1987 - 2016                                  122

4.2.7:   Z-test statistics computation of significant difference in capacity utilization of

modern and traditional rice processing enterprise mills                                            125

4.2.8    Comparative analysis of the trend in capacity utilization of modern and

traditional rice processing enterprise mills from 1987 - 2016                                  126

4.2.9:   Z-test statistics computation of significant difference in capacity unutilized of

modern and traditional rice processing enterprise mills                                             128

4.2.10  Comparative analysis of the trend in capacity unutilized of modern and

traditional rice processing enterprise mills from 1987 – 2016                                 129

4.3       Factors Influencing Capacity utilization of Modern and Traditional Rice

Processing Mills                                                                                                         131

4.3.1    Examination of the principal component analysis on factors influencing

utilization of rice processing enterprise mills                                                            131

4.3.2    Breakdown analysis of total variance explained on factors influencing

utilization of rice processing enterprise mills                                                             133

4.3.3    Analysis communalities scores on factors influencing utilization of rice

processing enterprise mills                                                                                         134

4.4       Determinants of Investment and Performance of Modern and Traditional Rice

Processing Enterprises                                                                                                136

4.4.1    Unit root test analysis of the modern rice processing enterprises                                     136

4.4.2    Analysis of investment determinants of modern rice processing enterprises            137

4.4.3    Investment determinants for traditional rice processing enterprises                                    139

4.4.4    Estimation of determinants of investment for traditional rice processing

enterprises                                                                                                                   140

4.4.5    Determinants of performance of modern rice processing enterprises                   142

4.4.6    Determinants of performance of traditional rice processing enterprises                   144

4.5       Feasibility and Viability of Investment in Modern and Traditional Rice Processing enterprises                                                                                                                     148

4.5.1    Feasibility and viability of investment in modern rice processing enterprises          148

4.5.2    Feasibility and viability of investment in traditional rice processing enterprises 151

4.6       Performance of Modern and Traditional Rice Processing Enterprises                  154

4.6.1    Performance analysis of modern rice processing enterprises               154

4.6.2    Performance analysis of traditional rice processing enterprises        158

4.6.3    Z-test statistics of hypotheses                                                                                    162

4.6.4    Trend in performance of modern and traditional rice processing enterprises

from 1987 – 2016                                                                                                       163

4.7       Effect of Investment on Performance in Modern and Traditional Rice Processing

Enterprises                                                                                                                  165

4.7.1    Effect of investment on performance in modern rice processing enterprises            165

4.7.2    Regression graph of the effect of investment on performance in modern rice

processing enterprises                                                                                                166

4.7.3    Effect of investment on performance in traditional rice processing enterprises       168

4.7.4    Regression graph of the effect of investment on performance in traditional

rice processing enterprises                                                                                         170

4.7.5    Pooled effect of investment on performance in rice processing enterprises                   172

4.7.6    Chow-test statistics of effect on investment on performance in modern and

traditional rice processing enterprises                                                                        174

4.8       Factors Militating the Adoption of Modern Rice Processing Technology                 176

4.8.1    Principal component analysis of factors militating the adoption of modern rice processing technology                                                                                         176

4.8.2    Total variance explained on factors militating the adoption of modern rice processing technology                                                                                                178

4.8.3    Communalities scores on factors militating the adoption of modern rice processing technology                                                                                                180

 

CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1       Summary                                                                                                                   182

5.2       Conclusion                                                                                                                 188

5.3       Recommendations                                                                                                     189

5.4       Contribution to Knowledge                                                                                       192

             References

            Appendixes

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                    LIST OF TABLES


4.1:     features of modern and traditional rice processing enterprises                        104

4.2:     features of modern and traditional rice processing entrepreneurs                108

4.3:     correlate between capacity installation, capacity utilization and capacity unutilized of modern rice processing mills                            113

4.4:    correlate between capacity installation, capacity utilization and capacity unutilized of traditional rice processing mills                      117

4.5:    result of z-test statistics of significant difference in capacity installation of modern and traditional rice processing mills                            121

 4.6:    result of z-test statistics of significant difference in capacity utilization of modern and traditional rice processing mills                            125

 4.7:    result of z-test statistics of significant difference in capacity unutilized of modern and traditional rice processing mills                           124

 4.8:    principal component analysis factors influencing capacity utilization of rice processing mills                                      131

 4.9:    total variance explained on factors influencing capacity utilization of

rice processing mills                                                133

 4.10:   communalities scores on factors influencing capacity utilization of mills    134

 4.11:   unit root-test result for modern rice processing enterprises                          136

 4.12:   estimation of determinants of investment for modern rice processing enterprises                                      137

 4.13:   unit root-test result for traditional rice processing enterprises                    139

 4.14:   estimation of determinants of investment for traditional rice processing enterprises                                  140

 4.15:   maximum likelihood estimates of stochastic trans-log frontier production function for modern rice processing enterprises          142

 4.16:   maximum likelihood estimates of stochastic trans-log frontier production function for traditional rice processing enterprises                                        145

 4.17:   feasibility and viability of investment in modern rice processing

enterprises                                                                 148

 4.18:   feasibility and viability of investment in modern rice processing

enterprises                                                                                                       150

 4.19:   feasibility and viability of investment in traditional rice processing            enterprises                                                         151

 4.20:   feasibility and viability of investment in traditional rice processing

enterprises                                                                                                       153

 4.21:   performance analysis of modern rice processing enterprises                        155

 4.22:   performance analysis of modern rice processing enterprises                         157

 4.23:   performance analysis of traditional rice processing enterprises                        159

 4.24:   performance analysis of traditional rice processing enterprises                        161

 4.25:   result of z-test of significant difference in performance of modern and traditional rice processing enterprises                              162

 4.26:   effect of investment on performance of modern rice processing enterprises165

 4.27:   effect of investment on performance of traditional rice processing

enterprises                                                  168

 4.28:   pooled effect of investment on performance of rice processing enterprises       172

 4.29:   chow-test of statistics of effect of investment on performance of modern and traditional rice processing enterprises                             174

 4.30:   principal component analysis factors militating the adoption of modern rice processing technology                                       176

 4.31:   total variance explained on factors militating the adoption of modern rice processing technology                                      178

 4.32:   communalities scores on factors militating the adoption of modern rice processing technology                                      180

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                 LIST OF FIGURES


4.1:      trend analysis of capacity installation, capacity utilization and

capacity unutilized of modern rice processing mills from 1987 - 2016         115

 

4.2:      trend analysis of capacity installation, capacity utilization and capacity unutilized of traditional rice processing mills from 1987 – 2016      119

 

4.3:      trend analysis of capacity installation of modern and traditional rice

processing mills from 1987 – 2016                                          123

 

4.4:      trend analysis of capacity utilization of modern and traditional rice

processing mills from 1987 – 2016                                         126

 

4.5:      trend analysis of capacity unutilized of modern and traditional rice

processing mills from 1987 - 2016                                        129

4.6:      trend analysis of performance of modern and traditional rice processing from 1987-2016                                                       159

 

4.7:      regression graph of the effect of investment on performance in modern rice processing enterprises                                              166

 

4.8:      regression graph of the effect of investment on performance in traditional rice processing enterprises                       170

 

 




 

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION


1.1       BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Scarcity of local processed rice has persisted over the years, despite the rapid investment by the Government in rice processing enterprises. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI, 2015) and Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN,2016)  reported that rice supplies 70% of total per capita calorie consumption of Nigeria  and occupies about 1.88 million hectares of arable farm land, making it rank second most important cereal in the world after wheat in terms of processing and marketing. Domestic consumption of rice rose from 5 kg/person/month in 2000 to about 10kg/person/month in 2010 (Tarhavbusha, 2015). The consumption of milled rice has moved to 25kg/person/month, the relative ease of its preservation and cooking has influenced the growing trend in its consumption (Terzungwe, 2016).

West African Rice Development Agency (WARDA, 2015), stated that rice in its paddy state is not healthy for human consumption except it is processed. According to National Agricultural and Rural Development Agency (NARDA, 2015), there are two basic enterprises for processing rice namely, the traditional and modern enterprises. The traditional enterprise has a locally fabricated huller attached to an engine through a pulley with low output performance. The pre-milling (sorting, soaking, par-boiling and drying) operations and post-milling (blowing, de-stoning, polishing, grading and packaging) operations are manually done with higher level of broken grains and impurities (NARDA, 2015).

Food Service Equipment and Supply Company (FSESC, 2016), stated that the modern rice processing enterprise has all the pre-milling (sorting, socking, steaming, parboiling and drying) operations and post-milling (blowing, de-stoning, polishing, color-sorter, weighing separator, weighing  and packaging) operations combined and are automated with higher output performance and less level of broken grains.

In the move to respond to the increased per capita consumption of rice in Nigeria, a huge amount of foreign exchange is spent on importation of rice into the country due to inadequate investment and poor performance of rice processing enterprises in Nigeria which leads to scarcity of local processed rice. About 3.429 billion US dollars was spent on importation of rice between 2010 and 2014 (FAO, 2015). The truth is that Nigeria will not be able to sustain these levels of imports, which gave rise to the need to increase local rice processing by investing more in rice processing enterprises for better performance (FAO, 2016).

In an effort to reduce the country’s dependence on imported rice and boost local rice processing, the Government of North-central States through the Bank of Industry (BOI) established the Rice Processing Enterprise Borrowers Scheme (RPEBS). The scheme aims at providing rice processors loan in kind to boost processing and address the problem of scarcity of local processed rice. Fisman and Khanna (2004) opined that, North central states being one of the paddy producers in Nigeria had over 2000 traditional rice enterprises which were usually of low (0.1 metric ton, or 100kg/hr.) capacities in terms of processing while the modern rice enterprises  in the states process about 1 metric ton or1000kg/hr. 

Ajones (2015) confirmed that, rice processing enterprises in Nigeria underwent different phases of technological transformations related to Parboiling, drying, de-husking and blowing systems. Although it lags far behind countries like USA, UK, Germany, Japan, Taiwan, etc. there were  few fully  automatic plants in Nigeria with installed color sorter machine  and silky polishing machines that were imported from Japan, USA, UK etc. The parboiled rice produced by those units could compete in national and international markets.

According to Okoro (2012), there were few States (Benue, Nasarawa, Niger) in the North-central that had large concentration of modern rice enterprises, while the others (kwara, Kogi, Plateau) had good concentration. The rice processed by those enterprises catered for both domestic and export markets. The major products of these enterprises were parboiled rice, although there were some rice enterprises that produce raw rice as their principal products. Okoro (2012) further stated that, at the same time, only a few enterprises were producing the aromatic rice.

Regarding the available data on the modern rice enterprises, the Statistics Department of Federal Ministry of Agriculture (SDFMA. 2015) in Nigeria, presented North, North-West, South-West and South-East with the highest (over 3000) number of rice enterprises, followed by North-Central States with about 1,200 rice processing enterprises. Considering the functional rice enterprises in Nigeria, knight (2015) stated that only 30% of the modern rice enterprises were actually functional. Knight (2015) further pointed that, North-Central States had the third largest concentration of rice enterprises in Nigeria, and also accounted for the third largest proportion of non-functional rice enterprises.

Paddy rice could not be consumed in its raw form, it needed to be processed for human consumption according to Benue Agricultural and Rural Development Authority (BENARDA, 2015). Rice milling was the primary processing activity under which the hull and the bran are removed from the paddy grain and converted to polished white rice. The hulling and milling of paddy is also known as processing of paddy (NARDA, 2015). As earlier mentioned, rice processing enterprise is categorized into traditional and modern and that the traditional rice processing enterprise was the first to be introduced in Nigeria. However, with the advent of modern mechanical milling techniques, those traditional enterprises became obsolete (FAO, 2015). On the other hand, the conventional mechanical mills were again categorized into three main types Hullers; Sheller’s and Huller-cum-Sheller (WARDA, 2015). In Nigeria, majority of the paddy processing units were hullers followed by the Sheller’s and huller-cum-Sheller (NARDA, 2015).

According to (FSESC, 2016), the conventional rice huller (locally constructed) was seemingly high in rural areas. The hullers were usually of very low capacity mills, where both shelling and polishing operations were carried out simultaneously. Hence, there was no control on the polishing of rice by the hullers resulting to production of bran admixed with husk and a high level of broken grains (FSESC 2016). As compared to the huller operations, an improved modern rice enterprise had much higher capacity with separated processing mechanism  for de-husking  and polishing of paddy, which made the by-products like broken rice, bran, husk, etc. available separately (Bawa and Kainth, 2016). According to Bawa and Kainth (2016), the by-products like paddy husks were utilized to produce energy, furfural, etc. At the same time, they were edible and non-edible oil from the by-products bran.

Bawa and Kainth (2016) pointed out that, hulling ratio was treated as the ratio of brown rice to paddy while milling ratio was the ratio of polished rice to paddy. This was because of the fact that certain rice enterprises were of a two-step process in which the first step involved hulling of paddy to get brown rice and the second process included polishing of the brown rice to fine white rice. A comparative analysis of the out-turn ratio (OTR) of modern and traditional rice enterprise was one of the most important aspects. It was noted that, out-turn ratio is the conversion ratio of paddy to fine rice obtained through specific milling technique applicable. However, the variety of paddy considered as export quality variety is processed only in modern rice enterprise in negligible quantities (Lanning, 2015).

Indeed, a comparative analysis of the out-turn ratio was also arrived separately for the hullers (the traditional rice enterprises) and the modern rice enterprises remained significant, considering a number of studies in the past indicated that the overall supply of rice could be augmented substantially  with additional conversion of paddy processing techniques.  This observation, however, was based on the assumption that the out-turn ratio for the huller units (processing about one fourth of the nation’s paddy output) was comparatively lower than the modern rice enterprises. It was argued by a number of past studies that the out-turn ratio in the hullers remained more than 5 percent lower than the modern rice enterprises, with a higher ratio of broken rice (Lanning, 2015).

According to the Agro-economic Research Centre (AERC 2011), among the modern rice enterprises, there exists a huge difference in the milling technology applied for the processing of Paddy. This also depend on the mode and nature of technological advancement and technological up-grade of the paddy processing units. In fact, the early 1930s traditional rice enterprises were up-graded to keep pace with the technological advancement in the paddy processing industry. Some of the old rice enterprises used both sun-drying system and mechanical drying system simultaneously owing to various socio-political reasons. More highly sophisticated and fully automated imported mills with silky polish and color sorter machines were introduced. Such advanced paddy processing enterprises were only traced in some of the leading rice enterprises in the world (AERC 2011).

The basic need for the processing of paddy remained in the fact that paddy itself cannot be consumed in its raw form. Thus to enable the paddy grain suitable for human consumption, it needed to be milled either in raw condition or after parboiling (Ajones 2015). The essence of economics of paddy processing was the fact of how paddy was processed. The processing of paddy thus forms an industry, where paddy served to be the basic raw material, processed to form the finished product (polished fine rice) (Ajones 2015). It was interesting to observe that the processing of rice in Nigeria was carried out in small rice enterprises, most of which were the traditional enterprises. At the same time, there was a steady growth of improved modern rice enterprises with much higher capacities. Nevertheless, it remained the fact that, at present, both types of paddy processing enterprises co-exist. While the traditional claim a share of about half of the paddy processed, the other half of the entire paddy output was processed by the improved modern rice enterprises (Adeyokunu 2014).

According to Adeyokunu (2014). The economics behind the functioning of modern and traditional rice processing enterprises in Nigeria is by treating the paddy processing enterprises as strict business enterprises. The processing costs of final products to arrive at a conclusion of the economics of paddy processing in the traditional and modern rice processing were adopted. It was noted that, a few modern rice enterprises use methods such as sun-drying for the drying of paddy, some use both sun-drying and mechanical driers run by diesel. While some use electrical driers understandably, the costs of processing was not the same for every enterprise. Again with advancement of rice processing technology, the processing process became less labor intensive. As such, the more advanced rice enterprises were expected to have lower labor costs as compared to the less advanced rice enterprises, hence the need for increase in the number of modern rice processing enterprises in North-Central States of Nigeria to address the problem of scarcity of local processed rice (Musa, 2015).


1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Rice quality is a concern to Nigerian consumers who show clear and strong interest in imported rice, because of the high level of cleanliness (WARDA 2015). This has often been viewed as reflecting the level of competition of imported rice over local rice (WARDA, 2015). In most cases, when computing the cost and benefit of local rice, hardly does it include the cost of processing (Luga, 2011). Luga, (2011) explained further that if this is done, it may be easy to identify the problem of investment. Existing low availability of local processed rice reflect low level of improved processing technology in rice processing enterprises (Mccloskey, 2014). Mccloskey, (2014) stated further that, this low level of improved technology is demanding high level of investment in the enterprise to achieve progress in raising performance to meet consumers demand. The major challenge of rice processing enterprises in Nigeria lies on development of appropriate technology through investment to handle the modern and traditional rice processing enterprises (Mark, 2014). Mark, (2014) stressed further that there has been relative decline in the past on the output of processed rice which is attributed to disinvestment in the enterprises, partly, due to inadequate finance. However, Government reforming the rice enterprises considering the recent financial restructuring policies has not yielded much perceivable benefits (Onwumere and Ichie 2013).

History has it that, rice processing according to Kali (2015) was traced in Nigeria to the pre-independence era of 1930s when one of the first rice enterprise was discovered in Mbayongu district of Vande-ikya Local Government Area of Benue state. During the 1940s and 1950s, a few rice enterprises started coming up in and around koti for the purpose of supplying paddy from Jato- akaa. All the rice processing enterprises were using the crude (manual) method or techniques in processing rice with low performance (Kali, 2015). Gradually, the number of modern rice enterprises in North-central decreased from 30 enterprises in 1970, to 25 enterprises in 1980s. At the same time, the capacity utilization of the enterprises also decreased from 45% in 1970-76 to 30% in 1980-83 (Kali, 2015). This development showed that, the modern rice enterprises in North-central loses its relevance and were shut-down (Ajones 2015).

According to the findings of Mkanna (2016), one of the major threats in the declining of the modern rice enterprises was attributed to the growth of traditional rice enterprises that perform similar tasks performed by the modern rice enterprises. Upton (2015) identified other factor to be the advent of petty paddy rice traders around the traditional enterprises who supply enough paddy to the traditional enterprises and little or none to the modern enterprises. On his part, Mbaverluior, (2015) pointed out that, the imposition of levy on rice processors and fixation of processing price below the required price by government was another factor that led to the shut-down of the modern rice processing enterprises.

 Mbahar, (2014) opined that, the penetration of traditional rice processing enterprises in the rural areas in the early 1960s increased sharply and became competitive with the modern rice processing enterprises. Hazra, (2015) in his findings discovered that, the number of licensed traditional processors increased from about 130 units in 1970s to more than 200 units in 1988. Along with this, there were a huge number of un-licensed traditional rice enterprises, which were operating in a much wider scale in the rural areas. The increase in traditional rice enterprises led to a significant diversion of the marketed surplus paddy away from the normal market to the hands of the petty traders. The Government and the modern rice processing entrepreneurs had no control over it. Neither the market administrators could curb this undesirable development in the paddy markets nor could the modern rice processing enterprises adapt to changed scenario, resulting into drastic fall in the number of modern rice enterprises and capacity utilization (Patra, and Hazra, 2015).

The situation changed momentum when the Government intervened in the year 2011 by subsidizing the cost of modern rice processing equipment’s and machineries. This development helped to maintain about 50 modern rice enterprises in North-central States to boost rice processing through its input capacity by investing more in the business (Patra, and Hazra, 2015). According to Osuala (2015), the capacity of an enterprise can only grow if the entrepreneur improves the input capacity of the enterprise by investing more on input facilities and resources. Osuala (2015) further stated that, the improvement of the input facilities and resources of an enterprise depend on the entrepreneur’s financial investment. The level of financial investment determines the income of the entrepreneur (Osuala, 2015).

It was established in Abu (2015) findings that, traditional rice processing enterprises were manually and rural based operations. Also that, the modern technology of rice processing is generally considered as the easiest means of breaking the vicious cycle of manual labor in processing rice. Abu (2015) also stated that, inequality increase in Nigeria as a result of poor human capita development arising from manual labor. Therefore, the linkage of investment to performance is a determinant of sustainability in rice processing business in the country. Nuru (2015) in his study confirmed that, there is a widespread evidence of manual labor in rice processing in North-central Nigeria, especially when the rural rice processors rely heavily on family labor for their processing operations. Nuru (2015) further pointed out that, developing economies are characterized by low level human development which not only impedes present but also future productivity. In the light of this, Fasoranti (2016) reported that, the reduction of human manual labor in rice processing is a sure way of promoting large output of processed rice to eliminate scarcity of local processed rice in North-Central, Nigeria.

It has been argued by different researchers (Olukosi, 2015, and Isifor, 2015) that, the  scarcity of local processed rice in North-Central is due to the absence of improved technology and the inability of the rice processors to ascertain the cost  and returns in rice processing enterprises. Perhaps, this is why the much publicized rice processing enterprises development projects by the North-Central States Government failed to produce the desired impacts in rice processing business (Olukosi, et al. 2015). It is a well-known fact according to Ellis (2016) that, the bulk of rice processed in Nigeria takes place on small-scale processing but with tremendous potential outcome effect in the processing enterprises, organization and techniques remaining poor. Ellis (2016) pointed further that, the problem of inadequate supply of paddy to enterprises lead to under- utilization of the enterprises thereby decreasing the rice enterprises income and increasing scarcity. The Nigerian rice processors do not seem to fully exploit opportunities for capital formation, improved resources base, higher processing capacity, innovation and improved management techniques, thereby compelling them to operate sub-optimally (Nuru, 2015).

Rice processing enterprises in North-Central States are faced with the challenges of inadequate supply of paddy as well as poor electricity supply that result to low investment and performance of the enterprises leading to scarcity of processed rice (Jack, 2016). Jack (2016) reported further that, the activities of herdsmen induced environmental security problems to paddy producers which undermine investment in the production of paddy, making it difficult for the rice processing enterprises to access paddy. The rice enterprises in North–Central   according to Musa (2015) are still traditionally rooted with over 80% of them processing rice at subsistence level. Musa, (2015) stressed further that, the quantity of rice processed from each enterprise can hardly feed the States in North-Central, let alone exporting to other parts of the country. Nuru (2015) further confirmed in his report that, importation of rice into the country on daily basis is a sad reminder of one fact that, the North-central States could not boast of self-sufficiency in rice processing because of the high number of traditional rice processing enterprises. Market surveys indicated that, at present, the bulk of rice in North-Central States are from other parts of Nigeria and even foreign countries (Musa, 2015).

Rice processing is yet to command its place as a business in North-Central (Ellis, 2016). Despite the much publicized North-Central States Government support and intervention effort. For example, out of 15.024 million metric tons of capacity installation in the modern rice processing enterprise mills, only 14.230 million metric tons had been actually processed and out of 1,502,400 million metric tons of capacity installation in the traditional rice processing enterprise mills, only 1,405,500 million metric tons had been actually processed (Ajones, 2015).

Given the above problems, the following research questions were deemed appropriate.

      i.         What are the features of the modern and traditional rice processing enterprises?

     ii.         What is the relationship between capacity installation, capacity utilization and capacity unutilized of the modern and traditional rice processing enterprise mills?

   iii.         What are the factors that influence the capacity utilization of the enterprise mills? 

   iv.         What are the determinants of investment and performance of modern and traditional rice processing enterprises?

     v.         What is the feasibility and viability of investment in modern and traditional rice processing enterprises?

   vi.         What is the estimated performance of modern and traditional rice processing enterprises? 

  vii.         What is the effects of investment on performance in modern and traditional rice processing enterprises?

viii.         What are the factors militating against the adoption of the modern technology of rice processing enterprises?


1.3       OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The broad objective of this study is to comparatively analyze the investment and performance of modern and traditional rice processing enterprises in North-Central Nigeria. The specific objectives are to:

         i.         examine the features of modern and traditional rice processing enterprises;

       ii.          examine the relationship between capacity installation, capacity utilization and capacity un-utilization of  modern and traditional rice processing enterprise mills;

     iii.          examine the factors influencing capacity utilization of modern and traditional rice processing enterprise mills;

      iv.         analyze the determinants of investment and performance among modern and traditional rice processing enterprises,

       v.         examine the feasibility and viability of investment in modern and traditional rice processing enterprises;

      vi.         estimate the performance of modern and traditional rice processing enterprises

    vii.          assess the effect of investment on performance in modern and traditional rice processing enterprises and

  viii.          examine the factors militating against the adoption of modern technology of rice processing enterprises.


1.4 HYPOTHESES

In line with the specific objectives, the following null hypotheses were tested;

Ho1:     There is no significant difference in capacity installation, capacity

             utilization and capacity un-utilized of modern and traditional rice processing enterprise mills.

 Ho2:     There is no significant difference in the performance of modern and traditional rice processing enterprises.

   Ho3   There is no significant effect of investment on performance of modern   and  

            traditional rice processing enterprises

 

1.5       JUSTIFICATION FOR THE STUDY

The thrust of this study is in line with the emerging order of solving the problem of scarcity of local processed rice in North-Central States and Nigeria in general through an integral approach, which considers both the modern and traditional rice processing enterprises at the center. This was basically achieved following an assessment of the combined effects of investment and performance. Evidence from the study of Emeka (2015) explained the meaning and importance of investment in rice processing enterprises. In this regard, specific consideration was given first to the role played by investment in rice enterprises, based on performance in the processing of rice.

  Secondly, the investment inequality relationship was explored to show the quantity of rice processed. Thirdly, it was in line with the performance employed to increase processing. The study provide empirical underpinning to the policies that should be pursued in a successful supply of processed rice to the market. The selection of the modern and traditional rice processing enterprises for this research is drawn from the structural linkage between the two enterprises. Structural change is a transformation from reliance on the traditional method of processing rice manually to the modern method where improved technology in processing and other services dominate (Mccloskey, 2014).

To account for the strong rice enterprise interdependence between traditional and modern rice processing enterprises, balanced rice enterprise investment was seen as a strategy for sustainable economic growth. In other words, it would be more effective and efficient to foster policies to include all the rice enterprises so that economy wide, investment can gain optimally from its virtuous cycle, including the positive externalities of rice enterprises. It is expected that empirical estimates of the determinant variables of rice enterprises performance in both the traditional and modern rice processing as modeled in this study will help policy makers in pursuant of input capacity other than output capacity relied on. Jones (2014) asserted that in the long-run, supply response at the rice enterprises level is not possible without investment.

It is also expected that the conceptualization of this study adopted the investment economic model into contemporary thoughts of integration modern and traditional rice processing enterprises income inequality in investment. The economic and development theory of Neoclassical (1954, reviewed, 2013) indicates that, surplus labor from traditional rice enterprises is transferred to the modern technology rice enterprises whose growth over time absorbs the surplus labor, promotes industrialization and stimulates sustained development. In the model, the subsistence traditional rice enterprises is typically characterized by low wages, an abundance of labor and low productivity through labor intensive processing process. In contrast, the modern rice processing enterprise is defined by higher wage rates as compared to the traditional rice enterprises, higher marginal productivity and a demand for more workers. Also, the modern rice enterprise is assumed to use a processing process that is capital intensive thus, investment and capital formation in the processing rice enterprises are possible over time as modern entrepreneurs profits are reinvested in the capital stock (Jones, 2014).

Improvement in the marginal productivity of labor in the rice processing enterprise is assumed to be a low priority as the hypothetical developing nations investment is going towards the physical capital stock in the rice processing enterprises. However, the basic relationship between the two rice enterprises is that, when the modern rice enterprises expand, it draws labor from the traditional rice enterprises. This causes the output per head of laborers who move from the traditional rice enterprises to the modern rice enterprises to increase. An understanding of the tenants of this relationship between the two rice enterprises could partially explain the causes of scarcity of local processed rice in the market.

Though the role of investment in rice enterprises may not be a sufficient condition for adequate supply of processed rice, it still remains a condition (Schumpeter, 1954 reviewed by Kalu, 2014). To this end, the study has provided a strategy for accelerating investment in the traditional and modern rice processing enterprises. This has employed a framework that will identify the sources of investment. Considering the work of Jones (2014), econometric approach was used to decompose the sources of investment in the two rice enterprises to changes attributable to higher capacity in rice processing through additional inputs and other unexplained factors.

 This factor could be referred as total factor processing because it encompasses all sources of economic investment attributable to capital and labor. The derived total factor processed can be related to government policies and market variables that can help exchange rate, credit policies public expenditures and infrastructural development. Estimates from this procedure bring a clearer scenario of investment and performance and also permits the drawing of inference whether investment is “extensive” or intensive”, that is, whether investment has been driven by factor input investment or by processing increases. The reason for this distinction is to determine if observed investment in a rice enterprise or an economy in general is “sustainable”. Iyaha, and Dranah (2015), noted if investment is mainly propelled by rapid increase in capital, such investment may not be sustainable in the long-run. However, if investment is driven by increases in total processing, such investment can be sustained almost indefinitely. It is based on this processing approach measuring investment that makes the study different from other studies on the role of investment in rice processing enterprises to increase supply of local rice to the market.

Extensively, this study transcends beyond the causes of change in investment to its effect on the quantity of rice processed given varying levels of income inequality across the entrepreneurs. The approach of this study is geared towards providing empirical support to the assertion that, investment in rice enterprises is related to the quantity of rice processed (performance) by the modern and traditional rice enterprises and not a sufficient condition to satisfy the market demand with the supply of rice.

The intrinsic link between the quantity of rice processed and investment by the entrepreneur is in income inequality measured by the Gini coefficient, a measure of income dispersion. Olukosi and Isifor (2015) failed to show a direct linkage between investment and any core development objective. According to Okoroafor (2014), any indirect inference drawn from the coefficient, estimates of such a research in relation to an economic objective as poverty reduction remains rather speculative, hence cannot provide a variable guide for policy formulation in the specified area. Okoroafor (2014), further pointed that, growth is meaningful only when it accentuates to development that can as well be empirically tested. Olukosi and Isifor (2015) looked at investment without a core development objective, but this study is looking at investment in line with the performance of modern and traditional rice processing enterprises for maximum output.

The study is expected to be useful to rice processing entrepreneurs, marketers, consumers, students and policy makers. Since rice processing is a business that can create Jobs, generate income for the entrepreneurs and also for the government through taxes, there is need for entrepreneurs to economically plan before investing. Rice is noted for high incidence of price instability all year round. This study will help marketers in planning, budgeting and making investment decision in their marketing activities. This research will be useful to consumers as it will enlighten them on the market performance on when to buy rice in large quantity for storage when prices are low and supply is high.

 To students, it will form a basis for further research and reference materials. It will be useful to policy makers who need to know whether policy targets are being achieved and how investment will change with a given percentage of output resulting to economic policy implementation. More so, information from this study can contribute to more rational and sustainable investment in both modern and traditional rice processing enterprises.


1.6       SCOPE OF THE STUDY

This study is set to consider the modern and traditional rice processing enterprises, in North-central Nigeria from 1987-2016. It has given a broader view on the investment and performance of modern and traditional rice processing enterprises, and has made recommendations on the facts about investment and performance of modern and traditional rice processing enterprises, for the purpose of addressing the problem of scarcity of local processed rice in the study area.


 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment