-
-
$
Product Category: Projects
Product Code: 00005209
No of Pages: 131
No of Chapters: 5
File Format: Microsoft Word
Price :
$20
The performance of the FCC units plays a major role on
the overall economics of refinery plants. Any improvement in operation or
control of FCC units will result in dramatic economic benefits. Fluid Catalytic
Cracking (FCC) Units of Nigerian Refineries produced petroleum products at far
below their installed capacities. This work is aimed at examining the control
of a fluid catalytic cracking unit. The FCCU was designed to process 0.56bbl/hr
of Escravos gas oil and fabrication of same was carried out. Equipment
fabricated include Feed Surge Drum (Diameter 0.631m and Height 1.002m),
Feed/LCO Heat Exchanger (Shell Diameter 0.260m, Tube Diameter 0.030m and
Exchanger Length 1.000m), Feed/DCO Heat Exchanger(Shell Diameter 0.275m, Tube
Diameter 0.0245m and Exchanger Length 1.000m) , Feed/Slurry Heat
Exchanger(Shell Diameter 0.260m, Tube Diameter 0.024m and Exchanger Length
1.000m) , Feed Fired Heater (Base Diameter 0.872m, Height 1.745m and Tube
Diameter 0.024m), Riser Reactor (Diameter 0.545m and Height 1.817m), Main
Fractionator (Column Diameter 0.520m and Column Height 2.925m) and Overhead
Condenser (Shell Diameter 0.310m, Tube Diameter 0.0245m and Condenser Length
1.000m). Both manual and Hysys simulation software were used to carry out the
design and the results obtained were compared to ascertain most acceptable
technique for the design of FCCU. While Hysys simulation gave more detailed and
effective results, the manual design technique shows little discrepancy to
Hysys simulation result. Therefore, the manual design technique is also valid
and can also serve in the absence of the software for FCCU design.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Abstract
CHAPTER
ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
to the Study
1.2 Problem
Statement
1.3 Justification
1.4 Aim
and Objectives
1.5 Scope
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Historical Background of Petroleum Refining
2.2 Crude Oil and its Constituents
2.2.1 Hydrocarbon classification
2.2.2 Hydrocarbon compounds
2.2.3 Related works
2.3 FCC Feed Characterization
2.3.1 Feedstock physical properties
2.3.2 Density
2.3.2.1 API Gravity
2.3.3 Watson factor KW
2.3.4 True boiling point (TBP) method for crude characterization
2.3.5 Pour
point
2.3.6 Cloud point
2.3.7 Octane number
2.3.8 Sulfur
content:
2.3.9 Refractive index
2.3.10 Bromine number and bromine index
2.3.11 Viscosity
2.3.12 Conradson, ramsbottom, micro carbon, and heptane insolubles
2.3.14 Process variables
2.3.15.1 Dependent and independent variables
2.4.1 Catalyst component
2.4.2 Zeolite chemistry
2.4.3 Zeolite types
2.4.4 Role of zeolite in FCCU
2.5 FCCU Pilot Plant
2.5.1 FCC Pilot plant description
2.6 Cracking
2.6.1 Fluid catalytic cracking
2.6.2 Fluid catalytic cracking unit
2.6.3 FCC converter
2.6.4 Feed preheat
2.6.5 Riser—reactor—stripper
2.6.6 Riser catalyst separation
2.6.7 Disengager
2.6.8 Stripping Section
2.6.9 Steam ring applications
2.7 Catalyst Regeneration
2.7.1 Advantages of complete
combustion
2.7.2 Disadvantages of complete combustion
2.7.3 Regenerator–heat/catalyst recovery
2.7.4 Regenerator bed temperature
2.7.5 Standpipe/slide valve
2.7.6 Regenerator catalyst separation
2.7.7 Flue gas heat recovery schemes
2.8 Fractionator
2.8.1 Products and equipment involved in
fractionation
2.8.1.1 Bottom product
2.8.1.2 Light cycle oil
2.8.1.3 Gas – light naphtha – heavy naphtha
2.8.1.4 The absorber
2.8.1.5 Ethane stripper
2.8.1.6 Debutanizer
2.8.2 Vapor recovery section
2.9 Nigerian Fluid Catalytic Cracking Units
2.10 Reactor design
2.10.1 Fluidized bed reactor
2.10.2 Behavior of fluidized bed
2.10.2.1 Minimum fluidization velocity
2.10.2.2 Pressure drop
2.10.2.3 Bed expansion ratio (R)
2.10.2.4 Bed fluctuation ratio (r)
2.10.2.5 Fluidization quality (FQ)
2.10.3 Mass of solid in the bed
2.10.4 Terminal velocity, Ut
2.10.5 Reactor design
2.11 Process Selection
2.11.1 Types of FCC designs
2.11.1.1
Side-by-side configuration:
2.11.1.2 Stacked
configuration:
CHAPTER THREE
METHODOLOGY
3.1 Preamble
3.2 Design Basis
3.3 Process Selection and PFD Development
3.4 Process Description
3.5 Manual Design Procedure
3.5 .1 Material and energy balances
3.5.3 FCC Unit Surge Drum D-01
3.5.4 FCC Unit Feed Surge Pump P-01
3.5.5 FCC Unit Heat Exchanger E-01
3.5.6 FCC Unit Heat Exchanger E-02
3.5.7 FCC unit heat exchanger E-03
3.5.8 FCC unit feed preheater F-01
3.5.9 FCC unit reactor R-01
3.5.10 FCC unit main fractionator C-01
3.5.11 FCC unit air fin cooler A-01
3.5.12 FCC unit overhead separator D-02
3.6 Computer
(Hysys) Simulation
3.6.1 Process
simulation procedure
3.6.2 Process simulation
3.7 Detailed Equipment Design and Specification
3.8 Working Drawings of Individual Equipment
3.9 Fabrication
3.10 Development of Controls, Safety Considerations, Start-up and Shut Down Procedure
CHAPTER FOUR
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Material and Energy Balance
4.3 Detailed Equipment Specification
4.4 Working Drawing of Individual Equipment
4.5 Fabrication
4.5.2 Heat exchangers
4.5.3 Overhead condenser
4.5.4 FCC Fired heater
4.5.5 FCC converter parts
4.5.6 Main fractionator
4.6 Process Control
4.7 Safety Consideration
4.7.1 Feed preheating circuit
4.7.2 Converter
4.7.3 Main fractionator
4.8 Start up Procedure
4.9 Shut Down Procedure
4.10 Contribution to Knowledge/ Novelty of the Work
CHAPTER FIVE
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Conclusions
5.2 Recommendations
References
Appendix
Computer
Simulation Details showing screen shots of Hysys simulation results.
Table D1: Product
Distribution
Table: D2: Surge
Pump Feed Condition
Table: D3 Surge
Pump Performance
Table D4:
Exchanger Feed Condition
Table D5:
Exchanger Performance
Table D6:
Exchanger Feed Condition
Table D7:
Exchanger Performance
Table D8:
Exchanger Feed Condition
Table D9:
Exchanger Performance
Table D10: Heater
Feed Condition
Table D11: Heater
Specs
Table D12: Heater
Rating
Table D13:
Reactor Feed Condition
Table D14:
Reactor Operating Condition
Table D15:
Reactor Geometry
Figure D1: Column
Stages
Figure D2
Temperature Profile
Table D16: Column
Profiles
Table D17: Column
Tray Sections
Table D18: Column
Pressure Drop
Figure D3
Pressure Profile
Table D20:
Condenser Condition
Table D21:
Overhead Separator Condition
Table D22: Overhead Separator Sizing
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1: Review of related work
Table 2.2: Classification of different types of Crude oil
Table 2.3 Typical KRPC Feed Properties
Table 2.4 Regenerator Temperatures and Operating Modes
Table 2.5 Reactions occurring in the regenerator
Table 2.6 Important Reactions occurring in FCC
Table 2.7: Nigerian Refineries and their respective FCC Capacities
Table 3.1:Mini FCCU Design Basis
Table 3.2 Feed Composition
Table 3.3: Typical KRPC FCC feed charactristics
Table 4.1: Summary of Material Balance across FCC Unit Surge Drum (D01)
Table 4.2: Summary of Material Balance across FCC Unit Surge Pump (P01)
Table 4.3: Summary of Material Balance across FCC Unit Pre-Heater (E01)
Table 4.4: Summary of Material Balance across FCC Unit Pre-Heater (E02)
Table 4.5: Summary of Material Balance across FCC Unit Pre-Heater (E03)
Table 4.6: Summary of Material Balance across FCC Unit Fired heater (F01)
Table 4.7: Summary of Material Balance across FCC Unit Reactor (R01)
Table 4.8: Summary of Material Balance across FCC Unit Main Fractionator (C01)
Table 4.9: Summary of Material Balance across FCC Unit Air Fin Cooler (A01)
Table 4.10: Summary of Material Balance across FCC Unit Overhead Separator (D02)
Table 4.11: Summary of Energy Balance (Heat Loads) Across All Equipment
Table 4.12: Reactor Product Distribution from Aspen Hysys and Manual Design
Table 4.13: Main Fractionator Aspen Hysys and Manual Design
Table 4.14: Aspen Hysys Reactor Product Distribution
Table 4.15: Aspen Hysys Reactor Feed Condition
Table 4.16: Aspen Hysys Reactor Geometry
Table 4.17: Aspen Hysys Simulation Design Parameters for Fractionator
Table 4.18:
Summary of Furnace Design Parameters
Table 4.19:
Summary of Column Design Parameters
Table 4.20: Summary of Hysys Simulated Condenser/Heat exchanger Design Parameters
Table 4.21: Summary of Surge Pump Design Parameters
Table 4.22: Summary of Surge/Reflux Drums Design Parameters
Table 4.23: Surge Drum (D-01) Design Parameters
Table 4.24: Surge Pump (P-01) Design Parameters
Table 4.25: Pre-Heater (E-01) Design Parameters
Table 4.26: Pre-Heater (E-02) Design Parameters
Table 4.27: Pre-Heater (E-03) Design Parameters
Table 4.28: Heater (H-01) Design Parameters
Table 4.29: Column (C-01) Design Parameters
Table 4.30: Reactor (R-01) Design Parameters
Table 4.31. Riser termination dimentsions
Table 4.32: Cooler (A-01) Design Parameters
Table 4.33: Overhead Separator (D-02) Design Parameters
Table 4.34:
Design and actual values used for fabrication
LIST OF FIGURE
Figure 2.1
Zeolite Catalyst sites
Figure 2.2: FCC Pilot Plant Basic Equipment
Figure 2.3
Cracking Reactions
Figure 2.4a:
Position of FCC in the Refinery
Figure 2.4b Flow
Diagram of Fluid Catalytic Cracking Process
Figure 2.5: FCC
Unit Schematic Diagram
Figure 2.6 FCC
Unit Scheme Diagram
Figure 2.7a
Typical schematic of Exxon flexi-cracker
Figure 2.7b
Typical schematic of Kellogg Brown & Root—KBR
Figure 2.8
Universal Oil Products (UOP) Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit
Figure 2.9 SWEC
side by side FCC Unit
Figure 2.10a the
Converter Schematic
Figure 2.10b the
Converter Internals
Figure 2.11
Typical Feed Preheat System
Figure 2.12
Typical Riser Y
Figure 2.13 Two
stage cyclone system.
Figure 2.14a
Example of a two stage stripper
Figure 2.14b
Catalyst Stripper
Figure 2.15
Typical Rings with a Shaw-Designed Residue Catalytic Cracker
Figure 2.16: A
typical Regenerator using Lift air to transfer Catalyst
Figure 2.17 FCCU
Schematic Slide Valve Installed
Figure 2.18 FCC
typical Fractionator Circuit
Figure 2.19:
Fluidization regime in FCC
Figure 2.20:
Pressure drop across a fluidized bed
Figure 2.21:
Conceptual Fluidized Reactor
Figure 2.22:
Typical Side-by-Side FCC Reactor
Figure 2.23:
ExxonMobil Flexi-cracker side-by-side design
Figure 2.24: FCC side-by-side Reactor Design (a) RFCC Unit by SWEC (b) R2R Unit by Axens
Figure 2.25: UOP
Side-by-Side Design
Figure 2.26:
Kellogg Orthoflow Stacked Design (a) FCC Converter (b) Resid FCC Converter
Figure 2.27:
Other Stacked designs by Kellogg (a) OrthoflowTM (b) Resid FCC (c)
MaxifinTM
Figure 3.1:
Methodology block diagram
Figure 3.1
Simplified Stack FCC reactor
Figure 3.2:
Process Flow Diagram of Fluid Catalytic Cracking
Figure 3.3:
Manual Design PFD of Pilot FCC Unit
Figure 3.4 Flow
Streams of Surge Drum (D-01)
Figure 3.5: Flow
Streams of Surge Pump (P-01)
Figure 3.6: Flow
Streams of FCC Unit Heat Exchanger (E-01)
Figure 3.7: Flow
Streams of FCC Unit Heat Exchanger (E-02)
Figure 3.8: Flow
Streams of FCC Unit Heat Exchanger (E-03)
Figure 3.9: Flow
Streams of FCC Unit Preheater (F-01)
Figure 3.10: Flow
Streams of FCC Unit Reactor (R-01)
Figure 3.11: Flow
Streams of FCC Unit Main Fractionator (C-01)
Figure 3.12: Flow
Streams of FCC Unit Air Fin Cooler (A-01)
Figure 3.13: Flow
Streams of FCC Unit overhead Separator (D-02)
Figure 3.14 Hysys Modeled Pilot FCCU
Figure 4.4.1 Mini FCC surge drum
Figure 4.4.1: Mini FCC Surge Drum
Figure 4.4.2 Mini FCC heat exchanger
Figure 4.4.2: Mini FCC Heat Exchanger
Figure 4.4.3 Mini FCC fired heater
Figure 4.4.4 Mini FCC reactor
Figure 4.4.4:
Mini FCC Reactor
Figure 4.4.5 Mini
FCC main fractionator
Figure 4.4.6 Mini
FCC surge drum
Figure 4.4.7 Mini
FCC plant layout
Figure 4.5.1 Feed
Surge drum
Figure 4.8: FCC
Process Flow Control
Figure 4.9:
Proposed Feed Pump Instrumentation
Figure 4.10:
Proposed Feed Preheater Instrumentation
Figure 4.11:
Converter Steam Injection Points
Figure 4.12:
Propsed Converter Pressure Tapping Points
Figure 4.13: Proposed Main Fractionator Pressure Control
LIST OF PLATES
Plate I: Pictorial View of Fluid Catalytic Cracking Converter
Plate II: Air Grid in Fabrication Shop
Plate III: Pictorial View of CO Boiler Unit
Plate IV a: Dissected View of FCCU Pilot Plant 3D Diagram
Plate IV b: Dissected View of FCCU Pilot Plant 3D Diagram
Plate IV c: Complete View of FCCU Pilot Plant 3D Diagram
Plate V: Fabricated Surge Drum
Plate VI:
Fabricated Heat Exchangers with Red Oxide and Aluminium Spray
PlateVII: Shell and Tube of Overhead Condenser, before and after Red Oxide Spray
Plate VIII: Fabricated Fired Heater, before and after installation on furnance platform
Plate IX: Fabricated Reactor Parts before coupling (a) Stripper (b) 2-Stage Cyclone (c) Riser
Plate X: Fabricated Reactor Parts before coupling (a) Air grid (b) Regenerator (c) Disengager with circmesh
Plate XI: Fabricated Main Fractionator (a) Sieve tray arrangement (b) Sieve tray (c) Column sprayed with Aluminium Coat (d) Column Sprayed with Red Oxide
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study
The fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit present
challenging multivariable controls problems, because it is a very sensitive and
complex refinery system. The selection of inputs and outputs variables is an
important issue, as the pairing of chosen controlled and manipulated variables
for decentralized control. Continuous catalyst regeneration makes it possible
to manage the yields which are achieved by catalyst cycling between the
reaction and regeneration units. This ensures the reactor is continuously supplied
with freshly regenerated catalyst, and product yields are maintained at fresh
catalyst levels. Reliable and accurate control is important for total process
efficiency USEIA, (2015).
Unlike atmospheric distillation and vacuum distillation,
which are physical separation processes, FCC is a chemical conversion process
used in petroleum refineries. It is used to convert the high-boiling,
high-molecular weight hydrocarbon (HC) fractions of petroleum crude oils to
more valuable gasoline, olefinic gases, and other products. Catalytic cracking
produces more gasoline with a higher octane rating. It also produces by-product
gases that are more olefinic and more valuable, than by thermal cracking Gary
and Handwerk (2001), and Speight, (2006). The feedstock to an FCC is usually
that portion of the crude oil that has an initial boiling point of 340 °C or
higher at atmospheric pressure and an
average molecular weight ranging from
about 200 to 600 or higher. This portion of crude oil is often referred to as
heavy gas oil (HGO) and/or vacuum gas oil (HVGO). The FCC process vapourises
and breaks the long-chain molecules of the high-boiling hydrocarbon liquids
into much shorter molecules by contacting the feedstock, at high temperature
and moderate pressure, with a fluidized powdered catalyst Speight (2006).
Petroleum refinery is a complex industry that generates
a diverse slate of fuel and chemical products, from gasoline to heating oil
(Rader, 1996). The refining process involves separating, cracking, restructuring,
treating, and blending hydrocarbon molecules to generate petroleum
products. Technological perspective is
essential for a basic understanding of the complex refinery processes, a design
based perspective is essential to develop a greater insight with respect to the
physics of various processes, as design based evaluation procedures enable a
successful correlation between fixed and operating costs and associated
profits.
A refinery is a chemical plant that processes crude oil
and produces several valuable products; it contains different types of units
that perform a variety of different operations. The main goal is to take the
undesirable components of the crude oil and upgrade them into more valuable
products. Gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel are among the most valuable products.
Refineries perform three basic operations which are Separation (fractional
distillation), Conversion (cracking and rearranging the molecules), and
Treatment.
Fluid Catalytic Cracking process is an important and
widely used way to convert heavy feedstock into lighter, more valuable
products. There are approximately 400 FCC units operating worldwide, with total
processing capacity of over twelve million barrels per day (12 MMbbl/day) (Hug,
1998). Various feedstocks can be used, such as gas oils, vacuum gas oils or
residual materials. Typical products are gasoline, light fuel oils and
olefin-rich gases. The principal purpose of a cracking unit is to break high
molecular weight hydrocarbons into smaller pieces of lower boiling point fractions,
especially gasoline (Dwyer and Rawlence, 1993). Originally, thermal operations
were used to crack heavy oil, but the discovery of a catalyst that gives a
higher yield of gasoline with a higher octane number quickly brought on the use
of catalytic cracking units. Today, the most commonly used catalytic cracking
unit is the Fluid Catalytic Cracker or FCC (Wilczura-Wachnik, 1973). The fluid cracker consists of a catalyst
section and a fractionating section that operate together as an integrated
processing unit. The catalyst section contains the reactor and regenerator,
which, with the standpipe and riser, forms the catalyst circulation unit
(Ibsen, 2006).
This research work is intended at the design and fabrication of a fluid catalytic cracking unit of a Mini-Refinery for the ultimate purpose of improving present yield of gasoline in Nigerian refineries through pilot testing in the mini refinery FCCU of improved catalyst and different feed composition.
1.2 Problem Statement
Nigeria is one of the top oil-producing nations in the
world but processing this oil into finished products has been a major challenge
for the country. The Nigerian FCCU produced petroleum products at far below
their installed capacity and this is as a result of neglect by stake holders in
areas of research and developments in the fields of enhancing catalyst
development and new FCC feedstock. Also this due to unavailability of
operational data that can be used to improve the production capacity. There is
therefore the need to provide testing base for research in both fields and also
in providing operational data to boost oil processing capacity and be
self-reliant when it comes to petroleum and petroleum processing.
1.3 Justification
i.
Pilot plants can serve as small
scale of larger commercial units.
1.4 Aim and Objectives
The aim of this work is to carry out a control of a
fluid catalytic cracking unit. The specific objectives of this work include:
i.
Identify suitable process
selection for the Pilot plant
ii.
Carry out material and energy
balances
iii.
Development of a Preliminary
design of equipment
iv.
Detailed design of Major equipment
v.
Plant layout
vi.
Instrumentation and control
vii. Fabrication of the Pilot Plant.
1.5 Scope
The scope of this work is limited to the control of a
fluid catalytic cracking unit through the design and fabrication of a Fluid
Catalytic Cracking Unit of a Mini – Refinery to process 5 barrels per
batch in Nigeria as well as the safety consideration
of such a plant.
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
No Review Found.
Login To Comment