SOME PHYSICOCHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF HEAVY METALS AND POLY AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN THREE RIVERS IN AHOADA WEST, RIVERS STATE OF NIGERIA

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00007313

No of Pages: 216

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

$20

ABSTRACT


Environmental pollution/contamination has led to world-wide issues of source identification and abatement practices of pollutants. In this study, water and sediment samples collected from Taylor Creek, Kolo Creek and Orashi River (all in Ahoada West Local Government Area of Rivers State) were examined for physicochemical characteristics, heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Water physicochemical parameters indicated that all the parameters were within acceptable range for drinking water except biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), turbidity and dissolved oxygen (DO) in some instances. The result of heavy metals in water from all the sampled rivers indicated that Nickel (Ni) was the most concentrated metal, which was followed by that of iron (Fe). All the examined metals were within acceptable limits in the water except Ni and Fe (in some case). Contamination factor (Cf) analysis of the heavy metals indicated the rivers were generally contaminated with the examined metal except Ni that fall within the region of pollution. Pollution index (PI) determination gave values which indicated that the rivers were not polluted with the heavy metals. Contamination degree (Cd) assessment of the water samples indicated that the rivers showed values between low contamination to moderate contamination with heavy metals. Modified contamination degree (mCd) analysis showed that the rivers were within the range of non-contamination to very low contamination degree. The concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the rivers were in the order; Kolo Creek > Orashi River > Taylor Creek. There was the predominance of higher molecular weight (HMW) PAHs over lower molecular weight (LMW) PAHs in Kolo Creek and Orashi River, while in Taylor Creek, no particular group predominated. The concentrations of the heavy metals in sediment in all the rivers were in the order: Fe > Zn > Cu > Pb > Mn > Ni > Cr > Cd > Hg. The general order of metals concentrations in the rivers was Kolo Creek > Orashi River > Taylor Creek. Contamination factor analysis of sediment samples showed that the sediments were not contaminated with heavy metals. Pollution index examination indicated sediments free from heavy metals pollution. Contamination degree and modified contamination degree assessment indicated sediments with zero contamination with heavy metals. Geo-accumulation Index assessment showed sediments practically uncontaminated with heavy metals.  The values obtained in ecological risk assessments in the sediments showed that the environment is free from heavy metals associated risk. However, the values obtained for enrichment factor analysis, showed some form of anthropogenic enrichment of heavy metals, especially Zn and Cu. All the PAHs compounds were detected in the sediments of the rivers except naphthalene in Taylor Creek. The HMW PAHs were predominant over the LMW PAHs in all the sediments of the rivers. Source and diagnostic ratio assessment of PAHs gave both pyrogenic and petrogenic sources of PAHs thus implicating different input sources. The results obtained for all the parameters examined in both water and sediment showed that the aquatic environment generally may have health implications on human users and therefore adequate measures be taken to curb or abate the input sources.

 

 

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Cover Page

 

Title Page

i

Declaration

ii

Certification

iii

Acknowledgements

iv

Abstract

v

Table of Contents

vii

List of Tables

viii

List of Figures

ix

CHAPTER 1         INTRODUCTION

1.1

Background to the Study

1

1.2

Statement of the Problem

5

1.3

Aim and Objectives

6

1.4

Purpose of the Study

6

1.5

Significance of the study

7

1.6

Scope of the Study

8

CHAPTER 2        LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1

Outline

9

2.2

Heavy Metals

10

2.3

Heavy metals in different Environmental Media

11

2.4

Sources of Environmental and Health effects of Heavy Metals

14

2.4.1

Point Sources of Pollution

14

2.4.2

Non Point Sources of Pollution

14

2.4.3

Iron (Fe) 

15

2.4.4

Zinc (Zn)

17

2.4.5

Copper (Cu)

17

2.4.6

Chromium (Cr)

18

2.4.7

Lead (Pb)

19

2.4.8

Cadmium (Cd)

20

2.4.9

Mercury (Hg)

21

2.4.10

Nickel (Ni)

22

2.4.11

Manganese (Mn)

22

2.5

Mobility and Bioavailibility of Heavy Metals

24

2.6

Factors Affecting Concentration of Heavy Metals in Water and Sediment

25

2.6.1

Temperature

25

2.6.2

pH

26

2.6.3

Partition Coefficient 

26

2.6.4

Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC)

27

2.6.5

Redox Potential

28

2.6.6

Organic Matter

28

2.6.7

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)

28

2.8

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Water and sediment 

30

2.9

Sources of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Environment

32

2.9.1

Natural Sources of PAHs

32

2.9.2

Anthropogenic Sources of PAHs

32

2.9.2.1

Domestic sources of PAHs  

32

2.9.2.2

Industrial Sources of PAHs

33

2.9.3

Mobile Sources of PAHs

33

2.9.4

Agricultural Sources of PAHs

34

2.10

Environmental and Health implications of PAHs

34

CHAPTER 3    MATERIALS AND METHODS

3.1

Description of the Study Area

36

3.2

Sampling Techniques

38

3.2.1

Sampling for Heavy Metals

38

3.2.2

Sampling for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)

39

3.3

Preparation of Water Samples for Heavy Metals Determination

39

3.4

Preparation of Sediment Samples for Heavy Metals determination

39

3.5

Preparation of Water Samples for PAHS Analysis 

40

3.6

Preparation of Sediment Samples for PAHS Analysis

40

3.7

Heavy Metals Analysis 

41

3.8

Gas Chromatography – Mass Spectrometry Conditions

41

3.9

Analysis of Physicochemical Parameters

42

3.10

Assessment Models for Heavy Metals

46

3.10.1

Contamination Factor/ pollution index 

46

3.10.2

Degree of Contamination (Cd)

48

3.10.3

Modified Contamination Degree (mCd)

48

3.10.4

Geo-accumulation Index (I-geo)

49

3.10.5

Ecological Risk Factor (Ef)/ Potential Ecological Risk (RI)

51

3.10.6

Enrichment Factor Determination of Heavy metals

51

3.11

Source Determination and Diagnostic Ratio Assessment of PAHs

52

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1

Water Quality Variables

54

4.1.1

Physicochemical Parameters of Water Samples from the 3 Rivers

54

4.1.1.1

pH

54

4.1.1.2

Conductivity

55

4.1.1.3

Total Dissolved Solids

56

4.1.1.4 

Salinity

57

4.1.1.5

Dissolved Oxygen (DO)

58

4.1.1.6

Biochemical Oxygen Demand 

59

4.1.1.7 

Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)

60

4.1.1.8

Total Suspended Solids

61

4.1.1.9

Turbidity

62

4.1.1.10

Chlorides (Cl-)

63

4.1.1.11

Nitrates (NO3-)

64

4.1.1.12

Sulphates (SO42-)

65

4.1.1.13 

Phosphates (PO43-)

66

4.1.1.14

Temperature

67

4.1.2

Heavy Metals

78

4.1.2.1

Manganese (Mn)

78

4.1.2.2

Mercury (Hg)

79

4.1.2.3

Cadmium (Cd)

80

4.1.2.4

Lead (Pb)

81

4.1.2.5

Copper (Cu)

82

4.1.2.6

Nickel (Ni)

83

4.1.2.7

Iron (Fe)

84

4.1.2.8

Chromium (Cr)

85

4.1.2.9

Zinc (Zn)

86

4.1.3

Pollution Indices for Estimation of Heavy Metals Pollution in Water

97

4.1.3.1

Contamination Factor

97

4.1.3.2

Pollution Index, Contamination Degree and Modified Contamination Degree of Water Samples

103

4.1.4

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Water Samples

107

4.1.5

Sources of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water Samples

120

4.2

Sediment Quality Assessment

126

4.2.1

Heavy Metals in Sediment

126

4.3

Pollution Indices Assessment of Heavy Metals in Sediment

 

4.3.1

Contamination Factor

141

4.3.2

Pollution Index, Contamination Degree and Modified Contamination Degree of Water Samples

146

4.3.3

Geo-accumulation Index

151

4.3.4

Ecological Risk Factor and Potential Ecological Risk Index 

155

4.3.5

Enrichment Factor

159

4.4

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Sediment Samples

164

4.4.1

Source Identification of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Sediment Samples 

177

CHAPTER 5           CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1

Conclusion

182

5.2

Recommendations  

185

REFERENCES

187

           

 

 



 

LIST OF TABLES


Table 3.1:

The Geographic Positions of Sample Locations

37

Table 3.2:

Intervals and Significance Contamination/Pollution index

47

Table 3.3:

Interpretation of intervals of contamination degree

48

Table 3.4:

Classification and description of mCd

49

Table 3.5:

Intervals of contamination and interpretation of contamination  and pollution in geochemical pollution index

 

50

Table 3.6:

Terminologies used for ecological risk factor (Ef) and potential ecological risk (RI)

 

51

Table 3.7:

Categories of enrichment factor and interpretations

52

Table 4.1:

Physicochemical Parameters of Water Samples from Taylor Creek at the Different Stations

 

69

Table 4.2:

Physicochemical Parameters of Water Samples from Kolo Creek at the Different Stations

 

70

Table 4.3:

Physicochemical Parameters of Water Samples from Orashi River at the Different Stations

 

71

Table 4.4:

Mean Monthly Variation of Physicochemical Parameters of Water Samples from Taylor Creek

 

72

Table 4.5:

Mean Monthly Variation of Physicochemical Parameters of Water Samples from Kolo Creek

 

73

Table 4.6:

Mean Monthly Variation of Physicochemical Parameters of Water Samples from Orashi River

 

74

Table 4.7:

Heavy Metals concentrations in water samples from Taylor Creek at  the Different sample stations

 

88

Table 4.8:

Heavy Metals concentrations in water samples from Kolo Creek at the Different sample stations

 

89

Table 4.9:

Heavy Metals concentrations in water samples from Orashi River at the different sample stations

 

90

Table 4.10:

Mean Monthly Variation of Heavy Metals Concentrations (Mean ± SD) in water Samples from Taylor Creek

 

91

Table 4.11:

Mean Monthly Variation of Heavy Metals Concentrations (Mean ± SD) in water Samples from Kolo Creek

 

92

Table 4.12:

Mean Monthly Variation of Heavy Metals Concentrations (Mean ± SD) in water Samples from Orashi River

 

93

Table 4.13:

Contamination Factor Analysis of Heavy Metals Contamination of water samples from the Different Stations in Taylor Creek

 

100

Table 4.14:

Contamination Factor Analysis of Heavy Metals Contamination of water samples from the Different Stations in Kolo Creek

 

101

Table 4.15:

Contamination Factor Analysis of Heavy Metals Contamination of water samples from the Different Stations in Orashi River

 

102

Table 4.16:

Pollution index, contamination degree and modified contamination degree of water samples from Taylor Creek

 

104

Table 4.17:

Pollution index, contamination degree and modified contamination degree of water samples from Kolo Creek

 

105

Table 4.18:

Pollution index, contamination degree and modified contamination degree of water samples from Orashi River

 

106

Table 4.19:

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Concentrations in Water Samples from Taylor Creek at the Different Stations

 

111

Table 4.20:

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Concentrations in Water Samples from Kolo Creek at the Different Stations

 

112

Table 4.21:

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Concentrations in Water Samples from Orashi River at the Different Stations

 

113

Table 4.22:

Mean monthly variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentrations (Mean ± SD) in Water samples from Taylor Creek

 

114

Table 4.23:

Mean monthly variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentrations (Mean ± SD) in Water samples from Kolo Creek

 

115

Table 4.24:

Mean monthly variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentrations (Mean ± SD) in Water samples from Orashi River

 

116

Table 4.25:

Diagnostic Ratios of PAHs in water Sample from Taylor Creek

123

Table 4.26:

Diagnostic Ratios of PAHs in water Sample from Kolo Creek

124

Table 4.27:

Diagnostic Ratios of PAHs in water Sample from Orashi River

125

Table 4.28:

Heavy Metals Concentrations in Sediment Samples from Taylor Creek at the Different Stations

 

131

Table 4.29:

Heavy Metals Concentrations in Sediment Samples from Kolo Creek at the Different Stations

 

132

Table 4.30:

Heavy Metals Concentrations in Sediment Samples from Orashi River at the Different Stations

 

133

Table 4.31:

Mean monthly variation of heavy metals concentrations (Mean ± SD) in sediment samples from Taylor Creek 

 

134

Table 4.32:

Mean monthly variation of heavy metals concentrations (Mean ± SD) in sediment samples from Kolo Creek

 

135

Table 4.33:

Mean monthly variation of heavy metals concentrations (Mean ± SD) in sediment samples from Orashi River

 

136

Table 4.34:

Contamination Factor Analysis of Heavy Metals Contamination in Sediment samples from the Different Stations in Taylor Creek

 

143

Table 4.35:

Contamination Factor Analysis of Heavy Metals Contamination in Sediment samples from the Different Stations in Kolo Creek

 

144

Table 4.36:

Contamination Factor Analysis of Heavy Metals Contamination in Sediment samples from the Different Stations in Orashi River

 

145

Table 4.37:

Pollution index, contamination degree and modified contamination degree of Sediment Samples from Taylor Creek

 

148

Table 4.38:

Pollution index, contamination degree and modified contamination                     degree of Sediment Samples from Kolo Creek                  

 

149

Table 4.39:

Pollution index, contamination degree and modified contamination                     degree of Sediment Samples from Orashi River                                    

 

150

Table 4.40:

Geo-accumulation Index (I-geo) of Heavy Metals in sediment                    samples from the Different Stations in Taylor Creek

 

152

Table 4.41:

Geo-accumulation Index (I-geo) of Heavy Metals in sediment                    samples from the Different Stations in Kolo Creek

 

153

Table 4.42:

Geo-accumulation Index (I-geo) of Heavy Metals in sediment                    samples from the Different Stations in Orashi River 

 

154

Table 4.43:

Ecological Risk and Potential Ecological Risk of Heavy Metals                     in sediment samples from the Different Stations in Taylor Creek

 

156

Table 4.44:

Ecological Risk and Potential Ecological Risk of Heavy Metals in sediment samples from the Different Stations in Kolo Creek

 

157

Table 4.45:

Ecological Risk and Potential Ecological Risk of Heavy Metals in sediment samples from the Different Stations in Orashi River 

 

158

Table 4.46:

Enrichment Factor of Heavy Metals in sediment samples from the Different Stations in Taylor Creek

 

161

Table 4.47:

Enrichment Factor of Heavy Metals in sediment samples from the Different Stations in Kolo Creek

 

162

Table 4.48:

Enrichment Factor of Heavy Metals in sediment samples from the Different Stations in Orashi River  

 

163

Table 4.49:

Polycyclic aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentrations in                   sediment samples from Taylor Creek at the different stations            

 

168

Table 4.50

Polycyclic aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentrations in                    sediment samples from Kolo Creek at the different stations 

 

169

Table 4.51

Polycyclic aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentrations in                    sediment samples from Orashi River at the different stations

 

170

Table 4.52

Mean monthly variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentrations (Mean ± SD) in sediment samples from Taylor Creek

 

171

Table 4.53

Mean monthly variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentrations (Mean ± SD) in sediment samples from Kolo Creek

 

172

Table 4.54

Mean monthly variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentrations (Mean ± SD) in sediment samples from Orashi River

 

173

Table 4.55

Diagnostic Ratios of PAHs in Sediment Samples from Taylor Creek

179

Table 4.56

Diagnostic Ratios of PAHs in Sediment Samples from Kolo Creek

180

Table 4.57

Diagnostic Ratios of PAHs in Sediment Samples from Orashi River

181






LIST OF FIGURES


Figure 4.1

Mean Values of Physicochemical Parameters in Taylor Creek within the Sampling Period

 

75

Figure 4.2

Mean Values of Physicochemical Parameters in Kolo Creek within the Sampling Period

 

76

Figure 4.3

Mean Values of Physicochemical Parameters in Orashi River within the Sampling Period

 

77

Figure 4.4

Mean Concentrations of Heavy Metals in water samples from Taylor Creek within the Sample Period

 

94

Figure 4.5

Mean Concentrations of Heavy Metals in water samples from Kolo Creek within the Sample Period

 

95

Figure 4.6

Mean Concentrations of Heavy Metals in water samples from Orashi  River within the Sample Period 

 

96

Figure 4.7

Mean Concentrations of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water Samples from Taylor Creek within the Sampled Period

 

117

Figure 4.8

Mean Concentrations of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water Samples from Kolo Creek within the Sampled Period

 

118

Figure 4.9

Mean Concentrations of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water Samples from Orashi River within the Sampled Period

 

119

Figure 4.10

Mean Concentrations of Heavy Metals in sediments of Taylor Creek within the sampled Period

 

138

Figure 4.11

Mean Concentrations of Heavy Metals in sediments of Kolo Creek within the sampled Period

 

139

Figure 4.12

Mean Concentrations of Heavy Metals in sediments of Orashi River within the sampled Period

 

140

Figure 4.13

Mean Concentrations of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Sediments of Taylor Creek within the sampled Period

 

174

Figure 4.14

Mean Concentrations of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Sediments of Kolo Creek within the sampled Period

 

175

Figure 4.15

Mean Concentrations of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Sediments of Orashi River within the sampled Period

 

176

 

 






    CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study

Pollution is a well-known phenomenon all over the world. The content of water, land and air are consistently interfered with by man while searching for a better alternative to life. Pollution can be defined as damage to the physical, chemical and biological properties of the environment, which may be water, air or land (Etim and Onianwa, 2013). When an environment is polluted, the use or applicability of that environment becomes difficult and harmful due to change in quality of the constituents of the environment (Uzoekwe and Oghosanine, 2011). Pollution constitutes stress to bio-organisms within the environment (Omoregie et al., 1997), hence the need to put the environment under constant check and evaluation.

Water pollution has been on the increase due to population growth, urbanization, and industrialization (Egborge, 1995; Ekaete et al., 2015). Increase in agricultural activities and other forms of production have also contributed immensely to water pollution (William et al., 2010). Water transports waste materials such as organic and inorganic chemicals through runoffs, river flows (current) and precipitation, which may have originated from agricultural farms, industries and in some cases, natural factors (Popoola et al., 2014).

Water sources need protection from degradation and devastation from agricultural, industrial and other forms of contamination or pollution which continually impact negatively on both terrestrial and aquatic environment (Iyama et al., 2014; Brraich and Jangu, 2015). The negative impact imposed on the water environment and the ecosystem resulted from its exposure to unwanted substances in the form of waste discharged into it. These wastes (which in most cases are not treated) are composed of different chemical components which possess the capacity to affect the environment (Adewuyi and Olowu, 2012). Both human and natural sources are known to introduce numerous unwanted pollutants and contaminants such as organic and inorganic constituents into the environment in the form of heavy metals, poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) (Baran and Oleszczuk, 2002; Obiakor et al., 2014). BTEX, aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons (Ahmed et al., 2015; Edokpayi et al., 2016), polychlorobiphenyls (PCBs), phenols, pesticides, biocides, suspended and dissolved solids are notable water pollutants (Suleimanov, 1995). The presence of these substances react and alter the natural state or chemical composition and the use of water, which eventually become harmful and toxic to aquatic plants and animals and man (the end user) (Ajiboye et al., 2011).

Heavy metals and other organic pollutants such as poly aromatic hydrocarbons are toxic and are persistent in the environment (Hajisamoh, 2013). Among the rural dwellers, there is complete absence of potable water, whereas it is very irregular in town and city settlements in Nigeria (Eneh, 2007). The pollution of the aquatic environment has led to its toxicity and therefore constitute a threat to aquatic biota which man depends on for food and water. This has driven man to search for alternative sources of drinking water such as digging of well and drilling of boreholes, which themselves are not altogether safe from heavy metals, hydrocarbons and other pollutants and contaminants (Bay et al., 2003; Uzoekwe and Oghosanine, 2011). Even the organisms which inhabit the aquatic environment have also been found to bio-accumulate heavy metals, Poly aromatic hydrocarbons and other hydrocarbons (Ashraj, 2005).

It is well documented (Baran and Oleszczuk, 2002; Obiakor et al., 2014) that heavy metals and poly aromatic hydrocarbons pose health challenges to consumers (animals and man). They possess carcinogenic, mutagenic and teratogenic effects to animals and man that got contact with them because of occupation (Ajiboye et al., 2011; Hajisamoh, 2013). Due to the health implication of heavy metals and hydrocarbons, the environment must be constantly examined so as to curb or avert the effects of these chemical constituents which are consistently discharged into the environment (Ajiboye et al., 2011).

Heavy metals belong to a group of metals and metalloids which have densities greater than 5g/cm3. They all fall into the group of transition elements. The presence of heavy metals in water, food, soil and air at some concentrations is considered dangerous to health and are considered as toxicants and pollutants, yet some of them are known as micronutrients at trace concentrations (Hogstand and Haux, 2011). The most unwanted metals in the environment are lead, mercury, cadmium and arsenic. This is due to the fact that even at very low concentrations, they are human poisons or toxicants which cause a lot of physiological problems in biological systems (Damek-Proprawa and Sawicka-Kapusta, 2003). Others, such as copper, zinc, iron, manganese, selenium and others are required by man and animals for proper growth and functions of cell system at trace or very small concentrations (Edori and Marcus, 2017). Sources through which heavy metals contaminate the aquatic environment are divers, but generally classified into natural and anthropogenic sources (Tajam and Kamal, 2013; Bhateria and Abdullah, 2015).

Poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) which consist of hydrogen and carbon are large group of compounds containing two or more fused aromatic (benzene) rings which differ from one another by the number of rings or substituents on the basic ring system (Mzoughi and Chouba, 2011). The arrangement may be linear, angular or clustered. Environmentally classified as pollutants among this large group of hydrocarbons are the following: naphthalene (Naph), acenaphthylene (Acy), acenaphthene (Ace), fluorene (Fl), phenanthrene (Phe), anthracene (An), fluoranthene (Flu), pyrene (Py), benzo [a] anthracene (BaA), chrysene (Ch), benzo [b] fluoranthene (BbF), benzo [K] fluoranthene (BkF), benzo [a] pyrene (BaP), indeno [1,2,3 – cd] pyrene (IP), dibenzo [ah] anthracene (DA) and benzo [g,h,i] perylene (BP) (Hajisamoh, 2011). 

Due to human explorative activities, heavy metals and poly aromatic hydrocarbons are very common and have almost become a natural component of the ecological environment. They are introduced into lakes, rivers, streams, seas and oceans on daily basis from rock weathering, runoffs, precipitation, industrial and domestic effluents, oil exploration and exploitation, oil spills and vandalization, illegal discharge and allowable or permissible discharges and flares (Alloway, 1990; Ogbonna et al., 2009).

Aquatic animals which inhabit the water system feed from the environment and therefore got heavy metals and hydrocarbons entrained into their systems (tissues and organs). These pollutants in the tissues of fishes bioaccumulate and bioconcentrate and are subsequently transferred to humans, which consume them for food (Mansour and Sidky, 2002; Vosyliene and Jankaite, 2006).

Many environmental (physico-chemical) factors are responsible for the association, dissociation, dissolution, mobility and toxicity of heavy metals in the aquatic environment. These factors include temperature, pH, salinity, pressure, organic content, hardness of water, nutrient levels of the water and sediment and redox potential (Iyama and Edori, 2016).

Sediment or soil is the final sink of pollutants. When pollutants (heavy metals or PAHs) get into any aquatic environment, they finally sink down to the sediment and therefore, the sediment becomes more polluted when compared to the water part of the environment (Bakan and Buyukgungor, 2000).

 

1.2 Statement of the Problem

It is a well-known fact that both industrial and agricultural activities by man are the major contributors of pollution or contamination of the environment with heavy metals and organic pollutants (William and Benson, 2010; Popoola et al., 2014). Different water bodies (rivers, lakes, reservoirs, creeks, streams and rain) are polluted by flared gases (Uzoekwe and Achudume, 2011), precipitation, discharged effluents from companies and residential quarters and runoffs (Abam, 1999). Uncontrolled waste discharges, bunkering activities, illegal refining of petroleum products, pesticides application and discarding of agricultural wastes are consistently increasing proportionally to population growth (Ghosh and Singh, 2005; Wokoma, 2014). Also, oils spill from old ruptured pipes due to age and vandalization (Abii and Nwosu, 2009), faecal deposition directly into the rivers are well known practices in the Niger Delta (Iyama and Edori, 2014).

Before the advent of drilling of boreholes in private homes by individual, creeks and rivers had been the only sources of water (except rainwater) for domestic uses, discharge of wastes, public toilet (defecation) and fishing, for consumption and commercial purposes (Iyama et al., 2014). The constant degradation of the water quality of these water bodies by man’s activities is becoming unbearable (Ekpenyong and Udofia, 2015) and also constitute a major problem to the community dwellers. Therefore, it becomes necessary to determine the extent of pollution/ contamination of these water bodies and the aquatic organisms in them, so that the effect of pollution or contamination on man could be avoided, minimized or controlled, since man directly depends on water and fish for livelihood.


1.3 Aim and Objectives of the Research

This research work is aimed at determining the pollution levels of Taylor Creek, Kolo Creek and Orashi River within the Engenni axis of the Ahoada West Local Government Area. The specific objectives were to:

(i)     Determine the concentrations of heavy metals in water and sediment samples from these rivers (creeks)

(ii)   Determine the concentrations of poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in water and sediment samples from these rivers (creeks)

(iii)  Evaluate the enrichment factor (EF), ecological risk index (ERI), potential ecological risk index (PERI), geo-accumulation index (I-geo), contamination factor (CF), pollution load index (PLI), contamination degree (CD) and modified contamination degree (mCD) resulting from the concentration of heavy metals in the sediment

(iv)  Examine the levels of some physico-chemical parameters of the different river waters and,

(v)   Compare the results obtained with set standards for water and sediment by regulatory agencies.


1.4 Purpose of the Study

The purpose of this work is to determine the concentrations of heavy metals, poly aromatic hydrocarbons and total hydrocarbon content in these water bodies. The study will be able to ascertain the sources of the pollutants, whether anthropogenic or natural, the levels of pollution or contamination of these water bodies and possible health implications associated with these pollutants. Again, the concentrations of the different pollutants in the different rivers will be of importance to the rural dwellers, who can be advised on the proper use of these rivers and also attract the attention of the government and multi-national oil companies operating within the area.


1.5 Significance of the Study

At present, there is no documented comprehensive study conducted on the concentrations of heavy metals, poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and other pollutants in the three water bodies (Taylor and Kolo Creeks and Orash River) in the Engenni axis in Ahoada West L. G. A of these rivers. The area where this research was carried out hosts two multinational oil companies (Shell and AGIP) whose exploration and exploitation activities are associated with spills and transportation of heavy equipment. Also, the people in the area under study are involved in intensive subsistence farming and fishing activities of which the proceeds attract large markets on weekly basis. This study will therefore, provide

a)      a baseline data on heavy metals and poly aromatic hydrocarbons and total hydrocarbon content in sediment and water in the study area

b)      the data generated will be used to assess the impact of heavy metals, PAHs and total hydrocarbon content on the consuming population

c)      the result obtained could be used by the Rivers State and Nigerian government in legislation as regard waste disposal, waste management and regulation of the activities of multi-national oil companies

d)     suggest proper clean-up process for the companies and government

e)      the result can be useful to health practitioners in disease diagnosis among the dwellers


      1.6 Scope of the Study

The study was designed to examine the extent of contamination / pollution of the water and sediments of three rivers/creeks (Taylor Creek, Kolo Creek and Orashi River) in Engenni, Ahoada West, Rivers State, Nigeria with respect to heavy metals, poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and total hydrocarbons. The atomic absorption spectrophotometer was used for analysis of heavy metals, while gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC/MS) technics was used to determine the concentrations of the different PAHs,. The physico-chemical characteristics of the water were measured using appropriate methods. The physico-chemical properties are contributory factors for absorption, mobility and bioavailability of pollutants in the environment. The work was limited to seasonal sampling for twelve months for all the indices with sampling rate of once in two months in the chosen river/creeks within the study area.

 

 


Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment