ABSTRACT
Environmental
pollution/contamination has led to world-wide issues of source identification
and abatement practices of pollutants. In this study, water and sediment
samples collected from Taylor Creek, Kolo Creek and Orashi River (all in Ahoada
West Local Government Area of Rivers State) were examined for physicochemical
characteristics, heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Water
physicochemical parameters indicated that all the parameters were within
acceptable range for drinking water except biochemical oxygen demand (BOD),
turbidity and dissolved oxygen (DO) in some instances. The result of heavy
metals in water from all the sampled rivers indicated that Nickel (Ni) was the
most concentrated metal, which was followed by that of iron (Fe). All the
examined metals were within acceptable limits in the water except Ni and Fe (in
some case). Contamination factor (Cf) analysis of the heavy metals indicated
the rivers were generally contaminated with the examined metal except Ni that
fall within the region of pollution. Pollution index (PI) determination gave
values which indicated that the rivers were not polluted with the heavy metals.
Contamination degree (Cd) assessment of the water samples indicated that the
rivers showed values between low contamination to moderate contamination with
heavy metals. Modified contamination degree (mCd) analysis showed that the
rivers were within the range of non-contamination to very low contamination
degree. The concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the rivers
were in the order; Kolo Creek > Orashi River > Taylor Creek. There was
the predominance of higher molecular weight (HMW) PAHs over lower molecular
weight (LMW) PAHs in Kolo Creek and Orashi River, while in Taylor Creek, no
particular group predominated. The concentrations of the heavy metals in
sediment in all the rivers were in the order: Fe > Zn > Cu > Pb >
Mn > Ni > Cr > Cd > Hg. The general order of metals concentrations
in the rivers was Kolo Creek > Orashi River > Taylor Creek. Contamination
factor analysis of sediment samples showed that the sediments were not
contaminated with heavy metals. Pollution index examination indicated sediments
free from heavy metals pollution. Contamination degree and modified
contamination degree assessment indicated sediments with zero contamination
with heavy metals. Geo-accumulation Index assessment showed sediments
practically uncontaminated with heavy metals.
The values obtained in ecological risk assessments in the sediments
showed that the environment is free from heavy metals associated risk. However,
the values obtained for enrichment factor analysis, showed some form of
anthropogenic enrichment of heavy metals, especially Zn and Cu. All the PAHs
compounds were detected in the sediments of the rivers except naphthalene in
Taylor Creek. The HMW PAHs were predominant over the LMW PAHs in all the
sediments of the rivers. Source and diagnostic ratio assessment of PAHs gave
both pyrogenic and petrogenic sources of PAHs thus implicating different input
sources. The results obtained for all the parameters examined in both water and
sediment showed that the aquatic environment generally may have health
implications on human users and therefore adequate measures be taken to curb or
abate the input sources.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cover
Page
|
|
Title
Page
|
i
|
Declaration
|
ii
|
Certification
|
iii
|
Acknowledgements
|
iv
|
Abstract
|
v
|
Table
of Contents
|
vii
|
List
of Tables
|
viii
|
List
of Figures
|
ix
|
CHAPTER
1 INTRODUCTION
|
1.1
|
Background
to the Study
|
1
|
1.2
|
Statement
of the Problem
|
5
|
1.3
|
Aim
and Objectives
|
6
|
1.4
|
Purpose
of the Study
|
6
|
1.5
|
Significance
of the study
|
7
|
1.6
|
Scope
of the Study
|
8
|
CHAPTER
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
|
2.1
|
Outline
|
9
|
2.2
|
Heavy
Metals
|
10
|
2.3
|
Heavy
metals in different Environmental Media
|
11
|
2.4
|
Sources
of Environmental and Health effects of Heavy Metals
|
14
|
2.4.1
|
Point
Sources of Pollution
|
14
|
2.4.2
|
Non
Point Sources of Pollution
|
14
|
2.4.3
|
Iron
(Fe)
|
15
|
2.4.4
|
Zinc
(Zn)
|
17
|
2.4.5
|
Copper
(Cu)
|
17
|
2.4.6
|
Chromium
(Cr)
|
18
|
2.4.7
|
Lead
(Pb)
|
19
|
2.4.8
|
Cadmium
(Cd)
|
20
|
2.4.9
|
Mercury
(Hg)
|
21
|
2.4.10
|
Nickel
(Ni)
|
22
|
2.4.11
|
Manganese
(Mn)
|
22
|
2.5
|
Mobility
and Bioavailibility of Heavy Metals
|
24
|
2.6
|
Factors
Affecting Concentration of Heavy Metals in Water and Sediment
|
25
|
2.6.1
|
Temperature
|
25
|
2.6.2
|
pH
|
26
|
2.6.3
|
Partition
Coefficient
|
26
|
2.6.4
|
Cation
Exchange Capacity (CEC)
|
27
|
2.6.5
|
Redox
Potential
|
28
|
2.6.6
|
Organic
Matter
|
28
|
2.6.7
|
Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)
|
28
|
2.8
|
Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Water and sediment
|
30
|
2.9
|
Sources
of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Environment
|
32
|
2.9.1
|
Natural
Sources of PAHs
|
32
|
2.9.2
|
Anthropogenic
Sources of PAHs
|
32
|
2.9.2.1
|
Domestic
sources of PAHs
|
32
|
2.9.2.2
|
Industrial
Sources of PAHs
|
33
|
2.9.3
|
Mobile
Sources of PAHs
|
33
|
2.9.4
|
Agricultural
Sources of PAHs
|
34
|
2.10
|
Environmental
and Health implications of PAHs
|
34
|
CHAPTER
3 MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
3.1
|
Description
of the Study Area
|
36
|
3.2
|
Sampling
Techniques
|
38
|
3.2.1
|
Sampling
for Heavy Metals
|
38
|
3.2.2
|
Sampling
for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)
|
39
|
3.3
|
Preparation
of Water Samples for Heavy Metals Determination
|
39
|
3.4
|
Preparation
of Sediment Samples for Heavy Metals determination
|
39
|
3.5
|
Preparation
of Water Samples for PAHS Analysis
|
40
|
3.6
|
Preparation
of Sediment Samples for PAHS Analysis
|
40
|
3.7
|
Heavy
Metals Analysis
|
41
|
3.8
|
Gas
Chromatography – Mass Spectrometry Conditions
|
41
|
3.9
|
Analysis
of Physicochemical Parameters
|
42
|
3.10
|
Assessment
Models for Heavy Metals
|
46
|
3.10.1
|
Contamination
Factor/ pollution index
|
46
|
3.10.2
|
Degree
of Contamination (Cd)
|
48
|
3.10.3
|
Modified
Contamination Degree (mCd)
|
48
|
3.10.4
|
Geo-accumulation
Index (I-geo)
|
49
|
3.10.5
|
Ecological
Risk Factor (Ef)/ Potential Ecological Risk (RI)
|
51
|
3.10.6
|
Enrichment
Factor Determination of Heavy metals
|
51
|
3.11
|
Source
Determination and Diagnostic Ratio Assessment of PAHs
|
52
|
CHAPTER
4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
|
4.1
|
Water
Quality Variables
|
54
|
4.1.1
|
Physicochemical
Parameters of Water Samples from the 3 Rivers
|
54
|
4.1.1.1
|
pH
|
54
|
4.1.1.2
|
Conductivity
|
55
|
4.1.1.3
|
Total
Dissolved Solids
|
56
|
4.1.1.4
|
Salinity
|
57
|
4.1.1.5
|
Dissolved
Oxygen (DO)
|
58
|
4.1.1.6
|
Biochemical
Oxygen Demand
|
59
|
4.1.1.7
|
Chemical
Oxygen Demand (COD)
|
60
|
4.1.1.8
|
Total
Suspended Solids
|
61
|
4.1.1.9
|
Turbidity
|
62
|
4.1.1.10
|
Chlorides
(Cl-)
|
63
|
4.1.1.11
|
Nitrates
(NO3-)
|
64
|
4.1.1.12
|
Sulphates
(SO42-)
|
65
|
4.1.1.13
|
Phosphates
(PO43-)
|
66
|
4.1.1.14
|
Temperature
|
67
|
4.1.2
|
Heavy
Metals
|
78
|
4.1.2.1
|
Manganese
(Mn)
|
78
|
4.1.2.2
|
Mercury
(Hg)
|
79
|
4.1.2.3
|
Cadmium
(Cd)
|
80
|
4.1.2.4
|
Lead
(Pb)
|
81
|
4.1.2.5
|
Copper
(Cu)
|
82
|
4.1.2.6
|
Nickel
(Ni)
|
83
|
4.1.2.7
|
Iron
(Fe)
|
84
|
4.1.2.8
|
Chromium
(Cr)
|
85
|
4.1.2.9
|
Zinc
(Zn)
|
86
|
4.1.3
|
Pollution
Indices for Estimation of Heavy Metals Pollution in Water
|
97
|
4.1.3.1
|
Contamination
Factor
|
97
|
4.1.3.2
|
Pollution
Index, Contamination Degree and Modified Contamination Degree of Water
Samples
|
103
|
4.1.4
|
Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Water Samples
|
107
|
4.1.5
|
Sources
of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water Samples
|
120
|
4.2
|
Sediment
Quality Assessment
|
126
|
4.2.1
|
Heavy
Metals in Sediment
|
126
|
4.3
|
Pollution
Indices Assessment of Heavy Metals in Sediment
|
|
4.3.1
|
Contamination
Factor
|
141
|
4.3.2
|
Pollution
Index, Contamination Degree and Modified Contamination Degree of Water
Samples
|
146
|
4.3.3
|
Geo-accumulation
Index
|
151
|
4.3.4
|
Ecological
Risk Factor and Potential Ecological Risk Index
|
155
|
4.3.5
|
Enrichment
Factor
|
159
|
4.4
|
Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Sediment Samples
|
164
|
4.4.1
|
Source
Identification of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Sediment Samples
|
177
|
CHAPTER
5 CONCLUSION AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
|
5.1
|
Conclusion
|
182
|
5.2
|
Recommendations
|
185
|
REFERENCES
|
187
|
LIST OF TABLES
Table
3.1:
|
The
Geographic Positions of Sample Locations
|
37
|
Table
3.2:
|
Intervals
and Significance Contamination/Pollution index
|
47
|
Table
3.3:
|
Interpretation
of intervals of contamination degree
|
48
|
Table
3.4:
|
Classification
and description of mCd
|
49
|
Table
3.5:
|
Intervals
of contamination and interpretation of contamination and pollution in geochemical pollution
index
|
50
|
Table
3.6:
|
Terminologies
used for ecological risk factor (Ef) and potential ecological risk (RI)
|
51
|
Table
3.7:
|
Categories
of enrichment factor and interpretations
|
52
|
Table
4.1:
|
Physicochemical
Parameters of Water Samples from Taylor Creek at the Different Stations
|
69
|
Table
4.2:
|
Physicochemical
Parameters of Water Samples from Kolo Creek at the Different Stations
|
70
|
Table
4.3:
|
Physicochemical
Parameters of Water Samples from Orashi River at the Different Stations
|
71
|
Table
4.4:
|
Mean
Monthly Variation of Physicochemical Parameters of Water Samples from Taylor
Creek
|
72
|
Table
4.5:
|
Mean
Monthly Variation of Physicochemical Parameters of Water Samples from Kolo
Creek
|
73
|
Table
4.6:
|
Mean
Monthly Variation of Physicochemical Parameters of Water Samples from Orashi
River
|
74
|
Table
4.7:
|
Heavy
Metals concentrations in water samples from Taylor Creek at the Different sample stations
|
88
|
Table
4.8:
|
Heavy
Metals concentrations in water samples from Kolo Creek at the Different
sample stations
|
89
|
Table
4.9:
|
Heavy
Metals concentrations in water samples from Orashi River at the different
sample stations
|
90
|
Table
4.10:
|
Mean
Monthly Variation of Heavy Metals Concentrations (Mean ± SD) in water Samples
from Taylor Creek
|
91
|
Table
4.11:
|
Mean
Monthly Variation of Heavy Metals Concentrations (Mean ± SD) in water Samples
from Kolo Creek
|
92
|
Table
4.12:
|
Mean
Monthly Variation of Heavy Metals Concentrations (Mean ± SD) in water Samples
from Orashi River
|
93
|
Table
4.13:
|
Contamination
Factor Analysis of Heavy Metals Contamination of water samples from the
Different Stations in Taylor Creek
|
100
|
Table
4.14:
|
Contamination
Factor Analysis of Heavy Metals Contamination of water samples from the
Different Stations in Kolo Creek
|
101
|
Table
4.15:
|
Contamination
Factor Analysis of Heavy Metals Contamination of water samples from the
Different Stations in Orashi River
|
102
|
Table
4.16:
|
Pollution
index, contamination degree and modified contamination degree of water
samples from Taylor Creek
|
104
|
Table
4.17:
|
Pollution
index, contamination degree and modified contamination degree of water
samples from Kolo Creek
|
105
|
Table
4.18:
|
Pollution
index, contamination degree and modified contamination degree of water
samples from Orashi River
|
106
|
Table
4.19:
|
Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Concentrations in Water Samples from Taylor
Creek at the Different Stations
|
111
|
Table
4.20:
|
Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Concentrations in Water Samples from Kolo Creek
at the Different Stations
|
112
|
Table
4.21:
|
Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Concentrations in Water Samples from Orashi
River at the Different Stations
|
113
|
Table
4.22:
|
Mean
monthly variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentrations
(Mean ± SD) in Water samples from Taylor Creek
|
114
|
Table
4.23:
|
Mean
monthly variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentrations
(Mean ± SD) in Water samples from Kolo Creek
|
115
|
Table
4.24:
|
Mean
monthly variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentrations
(Mean ± SD) in Water samples from Orashi River
|
116
|
Table
4.25:
|
Diagnostic
Ratios of PAHs in water Sample from Taylor Creek
|
123
|
Table
4.26:
|
Diagnostic
Ratios of PAHs in water Sample from Kolo Creek
|
124
|
Table
4.27:
|
Diagnostic
Ratios of PAHs in water Sample from Orashi River
|
125
|
Table
4.28:
|
Heavy
Metals Concentrations in Sediment Samples from Taylor Creek at the Different
Stations
|
131
|
Table
4.29:
|
Heavy
Metals Concentrations in Sediment Samples from Kolo Creek at the Different
Stations
|
132
|
Table
4.30:
|
Heavy
Metals Concentrations in Sediment Samples from Orashi River at the Different
Stations
|
133
|
Table
4.31:
|
Mean
monthly variation of heavy metals concentrations (Mean ± SD) in sediment
samples from Taylor Creek
|
134
|
Table
4.32:
|
Mean monthly
variation of heavy metals concentrations (Mean ± SD) in sediment samples from
Kolo Creek
|
135
|
Table
4.33:
|
Mean monthly
variation of heavy metals concentrations (Mean ± SD) in sediment samples from
Orashi River
|
136
|
Table
4.34:
|
Contamination
Factor Analysis of Heavy Metals Contamination in Sediment samples from the
Different Stations in Taylor Creek
|
143
|
Table
4.35:
|
Contamination
Factor Analysis of Heavy Metals Contamination in Sediment samples from the
Different Stations in Kolo Creek
|
144
|
Table
4.36:
|
Contamination
Factor Analysis of Heavy Metals Contamination in Sediment samples from the
Different Stations in Orashi River
|
145
|
Table
4.37:
|
Pollution
index, contamination degree and modified contamination degree of Sediment
Samples from Taylor Creek
|
148
|
Table
4.38:
|
Pollution
index, contamination degree and modified contamination degree of Sediment
Samples from Kolo Creek
|
149
|
Table
4.39:
|
Pollution
index, contamination degree and modified contamination degree of Sediment
Samples from Orashi River
|
150
|
Table
4.40:
|
Geo-accumulation
Index (I-geo) of Heavy Metals in sediment samples from the Different Stations in
Taylor Creek
|
152
|
Table
4.41:
|
Geo-accumulation
Index (I-geo) of Heavy Metals in sediment samples from the
Different Stations in Kolo Creek
|
153
|
Table
4.42:
|
Geo-accumulation
Index (I-geo) of Heavy Metals in sediment samples from the
Different Stations in Orashi River
|
154
|
Table
4.43:
|
Ecological
Risk and Potential Ecological Risk of Heavy Metals in sediment samples from
the Different Stations in Taylor Creek
|
156
|
Table
4.44:
|
Ecological
Risk and Potential Ecological Risk of Heavy Metals in sediment samples from
the Different Stations in Kolo Creek
|
157
|
Table
4.45:
|
Ecological
Risk and Potential Ecological Risk of Heavy Metals in sediment samples from
the Different Stations in Orashi River
|
158
|
Table
4.46:
|
Enrichment
Factor of Heavy Metals in sediment samples from the Different Stations in
Taylor Creek
|
161
|
Table
4.47:
|
Enrichment
Factor of Heavy Metals in sediment samples from the Different Stations in
Kolo Creek
|
162
|
Table
4.48:
|
Enrichment
Factor of Heavy Metals in sediment samples from the Different Stations in
Orashi River
|
163
|
Table
4.49:
|
Polycyclic
aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentrations in sediment samples from
Taylor Creek at the different stations
|
168
|
Table
4.50
|
Polycyclic
aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentrations in sediment samples from
Kolo Creek at the different stations
|
169
|
Table
4.51
|
Polycyclic
aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentrations in sediment samples from
Orashi River at the different stations
|
170
|
Table
4.52
|
Mean
monthly variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentrations
(Mean ± SD) in sediment samples from Taylor Creek
|
171
|
Table
4.53
|
Mean
monthly variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentrations
(Mean ± SD) in sediment samples from Kolo Creek
|
172
|
Table
4.54
|
Mean
monthly variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentrations
(Mean ± SD) in sediment samples from Orashi River
|
173
|
Table
4.55
|
Diagnostic
Ratios of PAHs in Sediment Samples from Taylor Creek
|
179
|
Table
4.56
|
Diagnostic
Ratios of PAHs in Sediment Samples from Kolo Creek
|
180
|
Table
4.57
|
Diagnostic
Ratios of PAHs in Sediment Samples from Orashi River
|
181
|
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
4.1
|
Mean
Values of Physicochemical Parameters in Taylor Creek within the Sampling
Period
|
75
|
Figure
4.2
|
Mean
Values of Physicochemical Parameters in Kolo Creek within the Sampling Period
|
76
|
Figure
4.3
|
Mean
Values of Physicochemical Parameters in Orashi River within the Sampling
Period
|
77
|
Figure
4.4
|
Mean
Concentrations of Heavy Metals in water samples from Taylor Creek within the
Sample Period
|
94
|
Figure
4.5
|
Mean
Concentrations of Heavy Metals in water samples from Kolo Creek
within the Sample Period
|
95
|
Figure
4.6
|
Mean
Concentrations of Heavy Metals in water samples from Orashi River within the Sample Period
|
96
|
Figure
4.7
|
Mean
Concentrations of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water Samples from
Taylor Creek within the Sampled Period
|
117
|
Figure
4.8
|
Mean
Concentrations of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water Samples from Kolo
Creek within the Sampled Period
|
118
|
Figure
4.9
|
Mean
Concentrations of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water Samples from
Orashi River within the Sampled Period
|
119
|
Figure
4.10
|
Mean
Concentrations of Heavy Metals in sediments of Taylor Creek within the
sampled Period
|
138
|
Figure
4.11
|
Mean
Concentrations of Heavy Metals in sediments of Kolo Creek within the sampled
Period
|
139
|
Figure
4.12
|
Mean
Concentrations of Heavy Metals in sediments of Orashi River within the
sampled Period
|
140
|
Figure
4.13
|
Mean
Concentrations of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in
Sediments
of Taylor Creek within the sampled Period
|
174
|
Figure
4.14
|
Mean
Concentrations of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in
Sediments
of Kolo Creek within the sampled Period
|
175
|
Figure
4.15
|
Mean
Concentrations of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in
Sediments
of Orashi River within the sampled Period
|
176
|
CHAPTER
1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
Pollution
is a well-known phenomenon all over the world. The content of water, land and
air are consistently interfered with by man while searching for a better
alternative to life. Pollution can be defined as damage to the physical,
chemical and biological properties of the environment, which may be water, air
or land (Etim and Onianwa,
2013). When an environment is polluted, the use or applicability of that
environment becomes difficult and harmful due to change in quality of the
constituents of the environment (Uzoekwe and Oghosanine, 2011). Pollution
constitutes stress to bio-organisms within the environment (Omoregie et al., 1997), hence the need to put the
environment under constant check and evaluation.
Water
pollution has been on the increase due to population growth, urbanization, and industrialization
(Egborge, 1995; Ekaete et al., 2015).
Increase in agricultural activities and other forms of production have also
contributed immensely to water pollution (William et al., 2010). Water transports waste materials such as organic and
inorganic chemicals through runoffs, river flows (current) and precipitation,
which may have originated from agricultural farms, industries and in some
cases, natural factors (Popoola et al.,
2014).
Water
sources need protection from degradation and devastation from agricultural,
industrial and other forms of contamination or pollution which continually
impact negatively on both terrestrial and aquatic environment (Iyama et al., 2014; Brraich and Jangu, 2015).
The negative impact imposed on the water environment and the ecosystem resulted
from its exposure to unwanted substances in the form of waste discharged into
it. These wastes (which in most cases are not treated) are composed of
different chemical components which possess the capacity to affect the
environment (Adewuyi and Olowu, 2012). Both human and natural sources are known
to introduce numerous unwanted pollutants and contaminants such as organic and
inorganic constituents into the environment in the form of heavy metals, poly
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) (Baran and Oleszczuk, 2002; Obiakor et al., 2014). BTEX, aliphatic and alicyclic hydrocarbons (Ahmed et al., 2015; Edokpayi et al., 2016), polychlorobiphenyls
(PCBs), phenols, pesticides, biocides, suspended and dissolved solids are
notable water pollutants (Suleimanov, 1995). The presence of these substances
react and alter the natural state or chemical composition and the use of water,
which eventually become harmful and toxic to aquatic plants and animals and man
(the end user) (Ajiboye et al.,
2011).
Heavy
metals and other organic pollutants such as poly aromatic hydrocarbons are
toxic and are persistent in the environment (Hajisamoh, 2013). Among the rural
dwellers, there is complete absence of potable water, whereas it is very
irregular in town and city settlements in Nigeria (Eneh,
2007). The pollution of the aquatic environment has led to its toxicity and
therefore constitute a threat to aquatic biota which man depends on for food
and water. This has driven man to search for alternative sources of drinking
water such as digging of well and drilling of boreholes, which themselves are
not altogether safe from heavy metals, hydrocarbons and other pollutants and
contaminants (Bay et al., 2003;
Uzoekwe and Oghosanine, 2011). Even the organisms which inhabit the aquatic
environment have also been found to bio-accumulate heavy metals, Poly aromatic
hydrocarbons and other hydrocarbons (Ashraj, 2005).
It
is well documented (Baran and Oleszczuk, 2002; Obiakor et al., 2014) that heavy metals and poly aromatic hydrocarbons pose
health challenges to consumers (animals and man). They possess carcinogenic,
mutagenic and teratogenic effects to animals and man that got contact with them
because of occupation (Ajiboye et al.,
2011; Hajisamoh, 2013). Due to the health implication of heavy metals and
hydrocarbons, the environment must be constantly examined so as to curb or avert
the effects of these chemical constituents which are consistently discharged
into the environment (Ajiboye et al.,
2011).
Heavy
metals belong to a group of metals and metalloids which have densities greater
than 5g/cm3. They all fall into the group of transition elements.
The presence of heavy metals in water, food, soil and air at some
concentrations is considered dangerous to health and are considered as
toxicants and pollutants, yet some of them are known as micronutrients at trace
concentrations (Hogstand and Haux, 2011). The most unwanted metals in the
environment are lead, mercury, cadmium and arsenic. This is due to the fact
that even at very low concentrations, they are human poisons or toxicants which
cause a lot of physiological problems in biological systems (Damek-Proprawa and
Sawicka-Kapusta, 2003). Others, such as copper, zinc, iron, manganese, selenium
and others are required by man and animals for proper growth and functions of
cell system at trace or very small concentrations (Edori and Marcus, 2017). Sources
through which heavy metals contaminate the aquatic environment are divers, but
generally classified into natural and anthropogenic sources (Tajam and Kamal,
2013; Bhateria
and Abdullah, 2015).
Poly
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) which consist of hydrogen and carbon are large
group of compounds containing two or more fused aromatic (benzene) rings which
differ from one another by the number of rings or substituents on the basic
ring system (Mzoughi and Chouba, 2011). The arrangement may be linear, angular
or clustered. Environmentally classified as pollutants among this large group
of hydrocarbons are the following: naphthalene (Naph), acenaphthylene (Acy), acenaphthene
(Ace), fluorene (Fl), phenanthrene (Phe), anthracene (An), fluoranthene (Flu),
pyrene (Py), benzo [a] anthracene (BaA), chrysene (Ch), benzo [b] fluoranthene
(BbF), benzo [K] fluoranthene (BkF), benzo [a] pyrene (BaP), indeno [1,2,3 – cd]
pyrene (IP), dibenzo [ah] anthracene (DA) and benzo [g,h,i] perylene (BP)
(Hajisamoh, 2011).
Due
to human explorative activities, heavy metals and poly aromatic hydrocarbons
are very common and have almost become a natural component of the ecological
environment. They are introduced into lakes, rivers, streams, seas and oceans
on daily basis from rock weathering, runoffs, precipitation, industrial and
domestic effluents, oil exploration and exploitation, oil spills and vandalization,
illegal discharge and allowable or permissible discharges and flares (Alloway,
1990; Ogbonna et al., 2009).
Aquatic
animals which inhabit the water system feed from the environment and therefore
got heavy metals and hydrocarbons entrained into their systems (tissues and
organs). These pollutants in the tissues of fishes bioaccumulate and
bioconcentrate and are subsequently transferred to humans, which consume them
for food (Mansour and Sidky, 2002; Vosyliene and Jankaite, 2006).
Many
environmental (physico-chemical) factors are responsible for the association,
dissociation, dissolution, mobility and toxicity of heavy metals in the aquatic
environment. These factors include temperature, pH, salinity, pressure, organic
content, hardness of water, nutrient levels of the water and sediment and redox
potential (Iyama and Edori, 2016).
Sediment
or soil is the final sink of pollutants. When pollutants (heavy metals or PAHs)
get into any aquatic environment, they finally sink down to the sediment and
therefore, the sediment becomes more polluted when compared to the water part
of the environment (Bakan and Buyukgungor, 2000).
1.2 Statement of the
Problem
It
is a well-known fact that both industrial and agricultural activities by man
are the major contributors of pollution or contamination of the environment
with heavy metals and organic pollutants (William and Benson, 2010; Popoola et al., 2014). Different water bodies
(rivers, lakes, reservoirs, creeks, streams and rain) are polluted by flared
gases (Uzoekwe and Achudume, 2011), precipitation, discharged effluents from
companies and residential quarters and runoffs (Abam, 1999). Uncontrolled waste
discharges, bunkering activities, illegal refining of petroleum products,
pesticides application and discarding of agricultural wastes are consistently
increasing proportionally to population growth (Ghosh and Singh, 2005; Wokoma,
2014). Also, oils spill from old ruptured pipes due to age and vandalization
(Abii and Nwosu, 2009), faecal deposition directly into the rivers are well
known practices in the Niger Delta (Iyama and Edori, 2014).
Before
the advent of drilling of boreholes in private homes by individual, creeks and
rivers had been the only sources of water (except rainwater) for domestic uses,
discharge of wastes, public toilet (defecation) and fishing, for consumption
and commercial purposes (Iyama et al.,
2014). The constant degradation of the water quality of these water bodies by
man’s activities is becoming unbearable (Ekpenyong and Udofia, 2015) and also
constitute a major problem to the community dwellers. Therefore, it becomes
necessary to determine the extent of pollution/ contamination of these water
bodies and the aquatic organisms in them, so that the effect of pollution or
contamination on man could be avoided, minimized or controlled, since man
directly depends on water and fish for livelihood.
1.3 Aim and Objectives of
the Research
This
research work is aimed at determining the pollution levels of Taylor Creek,
Kolo Creek and Orashi River within the Engenni axis of the Ahoada West Local
Government Area. The specific objectives were to:
(i) Determine
the concentrations of heavy metals in water and sediment samples from these
rivers (creeks)
(ii) Determine
the concentrations of poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in water and sediment
samples from these rivers (creeks)
(iii) Evaluate the enrichment factor (EF), ecological
risk index (ERI), potential ecological risk index (PERI), geo-accumulation
index (I-geo), contamination factor (CF), pollution load index (PLI), contamination
degree (CD) and modified contamination degree (mCD) resulting from the
concentration of heavy metals in the sediment
(iv) Examine the levels of some physico-chemical
parameters of the different river waters and,
(v) Compare
the results obtained with set standards for water and sediment by regulatory
agencies.
1.4 Purpose of the Study
The
purpose of this work is to determine the concentrations of heavy metals, poly
aromatic hydrocarbons and total hydrocarbon content in these water bodies. The
study will be able to ascertain the sources of the pollutants, whether
anthropogenic or natural, the levels of pollution or contamination of these water
bodies and possible health implications associated with these pollutants.
Again, the concentrations of the different pollutants in the different rivers
will be of importance to the rural dwellers, who can be advised on the proper
use of these rivers and also attract the attention of the government and
multi-national oil companies operating within the area.
1.5 Significance of the
Study
At
present, there is no documented comprehensive study conducted on the
concentrations of heavy metals, poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and other
pollutants in the three water bodies (Taylor and Kolo Creeks and Orash River)
in the Engenni axis in Ahoada West L. G. A of these rivers. The area where this
research was carried out hosts two multinational oil companies (Shell and AGIP)
whose exploration and exploitation activities are associated with spills and
transportation of heavy equipment. Also, the people in the area under study are
involved in intensive subsistence farming and fishing activities of which the
proceeds attract large markets on weekly basis. This study will therefore,
provide
a) a
baseline data on heavy metals and poly aromatic hydrocarbons and total
hydrocarbon content in sediment and water in the study area
b) the
data generated will be used to assess the impact of heavy metals, PAHs and
total hydrocarbon content on the consuming population
c) the
result obtained could be used by the Rivers State and Nigerian government in
legislation as regard waste disposal, waste management and regulation of the
activities of multi-national oil companies
d) suggest
proper clean-up process for the companies and government
e) the
result can be useful to health practitioners in disease diagnosis among the
dwellers
1.6 Scope of the
Study
The study was designed to examine the extent of contamination
/ pollution of the water and sediments of three rivers/creeks (Taylor Creek,
Kolo Creek and Orashi River) in Engenni, Ahoada West, Rivers State, Nigeria
with respect to heavy metals, poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and total
hydrocarbons. The atomic absorption spectrophotometer was used for analysis of
heavy metals, while gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC/MS)
technics was used to determine the concentrations of the different PAHs,. The
physico-chemical characteristics of the water were measured using appropriate
methods. The physico-chemical properties are contributory factors for
absorption, mobility and bioavailability of pollutants in the environment. The
work was limited to seasonal sampling for twelve months for all the indices
with sampling rate of once in two months in the chosen river/creeks within the
study area.
Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects
FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!
+(234) 0814 780 1594
Login To Comment