Studies, in recent times, have shown that many nations both developed and developing that had never considered kidnapping as a serious social and political issues have begun to do so. This is due to the fact that the issue of kidnapping has attracted global attention as a result of its enormous harm to the socio-economic fabric of a nation. Kidnapping, as an issue, is not really a new phenomenon but has recently begun to constitute major threat to different states and the entire global order.

Lacquer (2003, p. 7) captures the attention that has been given to kidnapping in recent times when he noted that:

From time to time, following some spectacular attack, kidnapping would figure prominently in the media for a few days. There would be deliberations on the highest level of government, committees would be appointed and resolutions passed... In any case, kidnapping never threatens all countries in an equal measure, but this has changed now as kidnapping is bound to remain high on the list of country‟s priorities.

Some people have tried to query the attention government of nations pay to this issue of kidnapping. It was even said that kidnapping is a child of economic difficulty and illiteracy. However, Alan and Malecková (2003, p. 119) were quick to resolve this issues when they noted that “the most glaring misconception about kidnapping is the assumption that terrorists are underprivileged, uneducated individuals on the fringe of society.

Increasingly, empirical studies of kidnapping have demonstrated that such a notion is flawed. Not only is there no empirical basis for this perception, but kidnapping also appears to be more of a desirable undertaking than a last resort for many individuals”.

There is no doubt that the act of kidnapping spells doom to a nation. The effects go beyond the physical damage to include diverse collateral consequences, part of which is the psychological effects on the people. The psychological effects is increased when the people feel they are not been carried along. Interestingly, major re-allocations of resources occur to support the repair of physical and psychological damage, restore order and alleviate fear, attempt to recreate a sense of normality, and to initiate protective actions for the future, although many instituted after the terrorist act have emerged. The general economic impact of kidnapping is that it diverts resources and undermines economic stability (Saul, 2002, p.18).

Nigeria is not left out in the target for terrorists‟ actions. As a country, she has suffered series of conflicts. Bunmi (2011, p.5) observed that “the ethno-religious fracas in parts of Jos, in Sept. 2001, July 2002, Nov. 2008 till date; acts of militancy in the Niger

Delta and most recently the attacks on innocent Nigerians that started in Maiduguri (Borno State) and sporadically spread to other States in the North where the Boko Haram adherents had pitched their tents, and the recent bombing of Abuja, are recent crises and acts of terror this country faces”. 

The Boko Haram sect which has pushed the country to a tight conner still communicate treating messages to the government. During the 2009 uprising, their leader, Muhammad Yusuf, died in police custody. Since then, several arrests have been made by the Nigerian security forces, yet the attacks are getting messy as the group are demanding for the release of their members in Nigerian prisons. Recently, the media house have had their own share of the attacks as ThisDay newspaper headquarters in Abuja and the Daily Sun newspaper house in Kaduna were attacked by the sects. The group had earlier complained that the media are under reporting their activities and therefore have sworn to launch mass attack on the media (Daily Sun, 2012, p. 3).

The complain of the sect seems to have been a fallout from their knowledge of the importance of the media in reporting events in the society. Stating the importance of the media in kidnapping report, Laqueur (1976, p.9) noted that “terrorists have learned that the media are of paramount importance in their campaigns that the terrorist act by itself is next to nothing, whereas publicity is all. But the media, constantly in need of diversity and new angles, make fickle friends and so terrorists always have to be innovative. They are, in some respects, the super-entertainers of our time”. Writing further, Miller (1982, p.1) noted that kidnapping “is the media‟s stepchild, a stepchild, which the media, unfortunately, can neither completely ignore nor deny”. 

In line with the relationship between the media and kidnapping, this study sought to examine newspaper coverage of kidnapping in Nigeria with the aim of finding out the frame of analysis and presentation used by selected newspapers in the country. 

1.2     Statement of the problem

The act of terror might not really have any effect without the coverage of the media. Invariably, the mass media dramatically change, to some extent, the way and manner most terrorist exhibit their act of terror. In other to attract media attention, in most cases, terrorist identifies core areas of the fabric of the nation to perpetuate their evil act. This might be to make sure their actions do not escape the pages of the newspaper‟s account of the day‟s event(s). This is the only way their actions can be made known to a vast majority of the public. 

However, the way these events of terror are reported by the media might have lots of implications attached to it. It can create more fear in the minds of the people, encourage the terrorists to commit more acts of terror, hinder economic development, create negative image for the government, and prevent foreign investment. The list of implications might be more than what has been mentioned.  

This study, therefore, sought to examine newspaper coverage of kidnapping in Nigeria with the aim of finding out the frame of analysis and presentation used by selected newspapers in the country. 

1.3         Objectives of the study

Primary objective 

The main crux of this study is to examine newspaper coverage of kidnapping in Nigeria with the aim of finding out the frame of analysis and presentation used by some selected newspapers in the country. 

Specific objectives

Other specific objectives includes to: 

1.     Identify the direction of newspaper coverage of kidnapping in Nigeria.

2.     Examine the level of prominence given to the news stories on kidnapping in the country.

3.     Find out the depth of newspaper coverage of the issues of kidnapping in Nigeria.

4.     Find out the economic implication of newspaper coverage of kidnapping.

5.     Identify how government responded to the news of kidnapping in the country.  

1.5        Research questions

This study was guided by the following research questions:

1.      What is the direction of newspaper coverage of kidnapping in Nigeria?

2.      What is the level of prominence given to the news stories on kidnapping in the country?

3.      What is the depth of newspaper coverage of the issues of kidnapping in Nigeria?

4.      What is the economic implication of newspaper coverage of kidnapping in the country?

5.      How did government respond to the news of kidnapping in the country?  

1.5. Significance of the study

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.