PROPERTIES OF BLOCK BOARDS MADE FROM WOOD WASTES OF MICROBRELINIA BRAZZAVILLENSIS, BRACHYSTEGIA EURYCOMA, AND CEDRUS ATLANSTICA

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00009434

No of Pages: 93

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦5000

ABSTRACT

Interest is growing everyday on proper utilization of wood waste resulting partly from poor saw doctoring techniques and lack of skillful machinist for furniture production and engineered wood products. The concept is to mitigate the scarcity of wood raw materials supply. This study seeks to investigate the properties of block-board as engineered wood product made from wood waste of Microbrelinia brazzavillensis, Brachystegia eurycoma, and cedrus atlastica to explore the viability of recovering of under desired dimension of wood for the production of block-boards. The strips were processed and subjected to test to determine the properties of the materials. The strips gotten from three different wood species were used for the fabrication of four samples of block-boards each. The sample specimens from the manufactured boards were tested for both physical and mechanical properties. The test data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA), regression statistics analysis, and pie chart and bar chart analysis in order to test for the level of significance among the obtained parameters. Results showed the mean moisture content (MC) of 10.71%, 10.45%, 9.38%, and 10.86%. Water absorption mean value of 11.99%, 6.60%, 6.38%, and 6.65%. Density of 0.000659g/cm3, 0.000690g/cm3, 0.000715g/cm3, and 0.000662g/cm3. Comprehensive strength value of 0.453N/mm2, 0.409N/mm2, 0.397N/mm2, 0.416N/mm2 static bending: MOE 1265N/mm2 and MOR 85.9 N/mm2 and impact test. Considering the contradictions about property changes in wood, it was presumed that eventually alterations were of little account and may be observed by the effects of other different samples. (i.e difference in density). Therefore, standardized methods were preferred in the study as they are proven to be reliable and allowing comparing the results of recent literature values of wood.

Keywords; Wood, block-boards, wood strips.






TABLE OF CONTENT

Title page                                                                                                                                i

Declaration                                                                                                                             ii

Certification                                                                                                                            iii

Dedication                                                                                                                              iv

Acknowledgments                                                                                                                  v

Table of content                                                                                                                      vi

List of figures                                                                                                                         x

List of plates                                                                                                                           xi

List of tables                                                                                                                           xii

Abstract                                                                                                                                   xiii

 

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION

1.1       Background of Study                                                                                                 1

1.2       Statement of Problem                                                                                                 6

1.3       Aim and Objective of the Study                                                                                 7

1.4       Justification                                                                                                                7

1.5       Scope of Study                                                                                                            8

CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW

2.0       Production of Engineered Wood Products                                                                 9

2.1       Generation of Wood Waste in Forest Industries                                                        11

2.2       Factors Responsible for the Volume of Generation of wood waste                                    11

2.2.1    Imperative of wood waste management in cross river state                                       12

2.2.2    Factors militating against industrial waste utilization                                                13

2.2.3    Current methods of wood waste handling in Nigeria                                                 13

2.3       Environmental Challenges                                                                                         15

2.4       Wood Waste Utilization                                                                                             16

2.5       Sources of Wood Waste                                                                                             17

2.6       Characterization of Wood Waste                                                                               19

2.6.1    Macro-structure of wood                                                                                            19

2.7       Highlight of Wood Industries in Nigeria                                                                    19

2.7.1    The pulp and paper industry                                                                                       19

2.7.2    Sawmill industries                                                                                                      20

2.7.3    Furniture industries                                                                                                     22

2.7.4    Plywood mill                                                                                                             23

2.7.5    Particle board mills                                                                                                     23

2.8       Special Issues in Plywood and Particle Board Operations                                         24

2.8.1    Mechanical behaviour                                                                                                24

2.8.2    Influence of density                                                                                                    25

CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY

3.1       Study Areas                                                                                                                27

3.2       Materials                                                                                                                     29

3.2.1    Equipment                                                                                                                   29

3.3       Methods                                                                                                                      29

3.3.1    Processing of wood strips and plywood                                                                     30

3.3.2    Assembling of wood strips for the core                                                                      30

3.3.3    Sorting                                                                                                                        31

3.3.4    Assembling of surfaces                                                                                               31

3.3.5    Gluing                                                                                                                         31

3.3.6    Planning                                                                                                                      32

3.3.7    Filling                                                                                                                         32

3.3.8    Sanding                                                                                                                       32

3.3.9    Conditioning                                                                                                               32

3.3.10  Finishing                                                                                                                    32

3.4       Tests Carried Out on the Block-boards                                                                      33

3.4.1    Determination of moisture content                                                                             33

3.4.2    Density                                                                                                                        33

3.4.3    Determination of water absorption                                                                             34

3.5       Mechanical properties determination                                                                         34

3.5.1    Compressive strength test                                                                                           34

3.5.2    Impact load test                                                                                                          35

3.5.3    Static bending test                                                                                                      36

3.6       Statistical Analysis                                                                                                     36

CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1       Introduction                                                                                                                38

4.2       Physical Properties                                                                                                     38

4.2.1    Results of moisture content                                                                                        38

4.2.2    Result of density                                                                                                         49

4.2.3    Water absorption                                                                                                        50

4.3       Mechanical Properties                                                                                                60

4.3.1    Compressive strength result                                                                                       60

4.3.2    Static bending test result                                                                                             63

CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

5.1       Summary                                                                                                                    66

5.2       Conclusion                                                                                                                  66

5.3       Recommendation                                                                                                        67

            References

           Appendices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIST OF FIGURES

1: Show the Map of Cross River State indicating the study Areas.                                       28

4.1:  Results of the moisture content of Zebra presented in bar-chat.                                  40

4.2:  Results of the moisture content of Zebra presented in pie-chat.                                              40

4.3:  Results of the moisture content of Achi presented in bar-chat.                                     42

4.4:  Results of the moisture content of achi presented in pie-chat.                                      42

4.5:  results of the moisture content of cedar presented in bar-chat.                                      44

4.6:  Results of the moisture content of Cedar presented in pie-chat.                                  44

4.7:  Mixed sample of A, B & C presented in bar-chat.                                                         46

4.8:  Mixed sample of A, B & C presented in pie-chat.                                                         46

4.9: Water absorption of zebra wood presented in bar-chat.                                                  52

4.10: Water absorption of zebra wood presented in pie-chat.                                                            52

4.11: Water absorption of achi wood presented in bar-chat.                                                  54

4.12: Water absorption of achi wood presented in pie-chat.                                                  54

4.13: Water absorption of cedar wood presented in bar-chat.                                                56

4.14: Water absorption of Cedar Wood presented in pie-chat                                               56

4.15: Mixed sample of A, B & C presented in bar-chat                                                         58

4.16: Mixed sample of A, B & C presented in pie-chart                                                        58

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

LIST OF PLATES


1: Assembling of wood strips                                                                                     37

2: Application of glue                                                                                                 37

3:  Processing of wood strips and plywood sheet                                                       37

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

LIST OF TABLES


4.1 (A): Result of moisture content of block-board made from zebra

              microbrelinia brazzavillensis                                                                                   39

 

4.2 (B): Result of moisture content of block-board made from achi                                     41

4.3:       Result of moisture content of block-board made from cedar                                  43

4.4:       Sample D.  mixed samples of A, B, and C                                                                45

4.5:       Analysis of Variance of Moisture content of the block board                                47

4.6:       Standard error of moisture content of block-board                                                   48

4.7:       Result for Density Determination of Sample A, B, C, and D                                 49

4.8:       Result 0f ANOVA One-Sample Statistics                                                                50

4.9:       Result of water absorption of Zebra-wood (Microberlinia brazzavillensis)                       51

4.10:     Result of Water Absorption of Achi-Wood (Brachystegia eurycoma)                   53

4.11:     Water of absorption cedar-wood (cedrus)                                                                 55

4.12:     Mixed Sample of A (Microberlinia brazzavillensis), Sample B                             57

             (Brachystegia eurycoma), Sample C (cedrus)

 

4.13:     Result of ANOVA of Water Absorption of the Specimens.                                     59

4.14:     Compressive strength of block board made from Micobrelinia spp                                    61

4.15:     Compressive strength of block-board made from Brachystegia spp                                    61

4.16:     Compressive strength of block board made from Cedrus                                         62

4.17:     Result of compressive strength of block-board made from three species                         62

4.18      Summary of bending test result for orientation 1 and 2.                                           64

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION


1.1       BACKGROUND OF STUDY

The Nigeria forest resources industry was among the key sectors that contributed grossly in the Nigeria economy within 1960’s to early 1970’s. At this time, the exportation of wood base resources or products and agricultural produce provide above 70% of the Country Gross Domestic Products (GDP). Though, the plethora oil discovery within 70’s result to the gregarious utilization of round wood for export, up to the time of prohibition in 1976. The excessive utilization of wood resources has affected greatly the growth of the forest resources industry. This factor mentioned and many other related factors such as lack of technical know-how, obsolete or aged equipment’s, etc. has militated against the fortune of the country’s forest industry.

According to (Aribisala, 1993)., the current public or general forest estate gained within 1900 and 1970 covered about 11% or 100,000km of the total land area of the country. It’s revealed that only 26% thereabout of this land covered the high forest area. It is further estimated that more additional 90,000km2 of high forest is available outside the forest reserves. This noticeable resource in Nigeria dated back or as far as 1792 has served as the mainstream or engine of development and propelled economic activities when pit sawing operation activities commenced, followed by the establishment of a power sawmill in the Delta region in 1902. These advancement or growth result to excessive exploitation of wood base forest resources for domestic industries utilization and export with substantial increase. Wood export peaked in 1950’s with log and sawn wood and subsequently, veneer and plywood. This trend was maintained and sustained in the 1960 and early 1970’s. However, by mid, 1970; the toll of intensive exploitation started showing. The volume of wood export which peaked at 700,000m3 in 1964 decreased steadily to 290,000m3 in 1970 (Aribisala, 1993).

Among the factors that led to the reduction in forest resources availability is intensive exploitation of the resources. As far back as 1899, the perspective planning for economic development was to exploit forest resource (Adeyoju, 1975). The revenue from forestry grew at 4.1%, 8.0% and 28.8% between 1950-1960, 1960-1970 and 1970-1980 respectively (Aribisala, 1993). The report witnessed the development of a virile forest products industry made up of well-structured sawmills, wood based panel industries, match factories and pulp and paper industries. The development of the forest sector is characterized by mechanical processing of timber into sawn wood, veneer and plywood. This promoted the vast growth of the economy by making positive contributions to raw material production and supply for construction, furniture and packaging.

Wood remains virtually the most predominant material used for construction and energy generation until the last half of the 19th century (Douglas, 1995). People used timber in the construction of houses, barns, fences, bridges, furniture items, material instrument.

Engineered wood products (EWP) have become very abundant in new homes and other structures.

These products are very popular compared to standard sawn lumber because they are generally simple to install and have several engineering and architectural advantages, such as longer spans and smaller sizes. In fact, EWP often carry a more desirable economic impact on a building project than standard milled wood, due to their ease of installation and therefore reduced labor costs.

Additionally, engineered wood products also has a longer design life, as the products are not subject to rot or other similar atmospheric or environmental effects to the same extent as their organic natural counterparts. Unfortunately, the adhesives they are made with tend to be made using formaldehyde based resins. Throughout their extended design lives from manufacture to disposal, they emit formaldehyde and other volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The manufacturing processes for these products are also much more complicated than standard grade lumber milling, and they require high energy and resource inputs. Some of the EWP available to the building industry are actually made of other materials from standard milling or veneering, such as particle board, oriented strand board (“chip board”) and parallel strand lumber beams.

Wood is one of nature’s gifts to mankind. Products that have over the years been made from wood fiber include all kinds of paper and board materials, cabinets, decorative works, moldings, beautiful furniture construction materials, sports equipment, parts for weaving and knitting mills, flooring, home building, rayon and other fibers, tanning chemicals and thousands of other products that touch our lives daily. However, as a result of population explosion and other factors leading to an increased demand for wood for various purposes, solid wood is becoming increasingly scarce. The combined effects of deforestation, shrinking forest stock and high consumption are resulting in an escalating problem which should be of both local and international concern (Frihart, 2004).

Hence, the use of wood has to be controlled to ensure its continued availability for human consumption and one of the ways through which this control can be ensured is to find and make use of technological methods of reducing or minimizing wastes in the wood industry. Currently, there is significant wastage of timber at every stage of its production, from harvesting, through the primary and secondary processing. Timber from products or old buildings that could be re-used is often thrown away (Frihart, 2004). One of the ways through which wood products could actually be re-used is through the production of Wood plastic composite especially from off-cuts, sawdust, shaving, undesired size and undesired dimension, for the production of wood based panel products.  Wood plastic composite as an engineered wood product offers opportunities to produce large degree of curved shapes for unlimited flexibility in design with a corresponding increase in mechanical and physical properties. Statistics obtained from Cross River State Forestry Commission show that about 30% of the log from the forest is regarded as waste right from primary and secondary stages of wood conversion due to poor silvicultural practice, poor knowledge of forest inventory and mapping, unskillful machinist in all the stages of wood conversion and inadequate saw doctoring technology in Nigeria saw mill. (Forestry Commission, CRS. 1992).

Approximately 85% of the ligno-cellulosic material used for particleboard, chipboard, fibre board, cement board and composite production is obtained from wood species. The rest consists mainly of seasonal crops such as flax, bagass, cereal straw and hemp. (Adewole, 2012). This high demand of wood material is what actually interests the researcher to create a template where, wood material will be utilized up to 94% of log harvest from Nigeria forest for sustainable forest conservation program.

The world economy has undergone rapid changes during the past decades with the advent of global competition to an extent that almost every enterprise is affected by it. Nigeria’s industrialization policy has always focused on development and utilization of locally available raw materials.

In the past, Nigeria was rich in forest resources in terms of its relative contribution to the economy. However, the real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) declined steadily from 42% in 1960s, to about 1.8% in 1985, 1.31% in 1995 and stood at about 1.2% in 1998 (CBN,1999). The observed trend in the performance of the sector requires urgent attention since the sector is crucial to the supply of forest products to industries such as sawmills, ply mills, paper mills, etc. All these wood based industries contribute immensely to the Nigerian economy (Adeweumi, et al, 2004). As a result of this, a new material for structural building has been developed. This is known as structural composite lumber (SCL); the wood waste consists of used lumber, branches of trees and other wood debris for construction and gubbing activities. Structural composite lumber consists of laminated veneer lumber (LVL), parallel strand lumber (PSL), laminated strand lumber (LSL) and thick oriented board (TOB). Wood remains virtually the most predominant materials used for construction and energy generation until the last half of the 19th century (Douglas, 1995). People used timber in the construction of houses, barns, fences, bridges, furniture items, and musical instruments. In contemporary times, wood is still widely used for construction purposes.

Wood waste generated at residential and commercial wood frame construction sites offer a greater potential for reuse because of ease of separating the wood during various stages of construction. Wood waste is commonly encountered in the environment due to the prevalence of lumber, pulp and paper industries, log rafting, bark stripping, and other wood processing activities, often resulting in wood waste entering the mill and urban environment. In some places, wood waste has been deposited in cities, towns and roadside.

There is evidence of huge wastage of resources during processing operation. These may be due to one or the combination of the following factors, inefficient operators, crooked logs, pile of slabs, half processed materials, rejects and saw dust (R.M.R.D.C, 1991). During saw milling operations, slabs, edging, trims and saw dust produced in extracting lumbers from round logs are considered as positive output.

According to Warsta (1978) the amount of residue depends on the species of the log, the size and shape of the log, the condition of the sawing machine, the competence of the machine operator and the required conversion specification.

Nigeria Institute for Social and Economic Research (NISER) defines wood residue as the pieces of material that are lost from the process of harvesting, up to when the final product (planks) have been taken, hence, residue may be regarded as negative product of wood processing. That notwithstanding, the wood residue in the saw mill is an important raw material in other industries. Onosode (2006) reported that the presence of defect in logs greatly affects the quality, volume of plank yield and volume of residue.

The term forest management is applied in situations where integrated coordinated series of actions are directed towards the achievement of specific objectives. Forest management is a process which effectively integrated the biological, social and economic factors which influence the decision leading towards the implementation of one or more specific objectives.  Forestry deal with the overall administrative, economic, legal, social, technical and scientific aspects related to natural and planted forests. It implies various degrees of deliberate human intervention to maintain the ecosystem and its function in order to favor specific valuable species or group of species for production of goods and services. The Environmental and Development Commission (1987), clearly recognized the necessity for a broad approach to sustainability.

 

1.2       STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The forest area of Cross River State is known to constitute about 90% of Nigeria’s remaining primary rainforest (FAO, 2000; Kehinde and Awoyemi, 2009). However, the forest has been decreasing at an alarming rate.

Currently the demand for wood as an engineering material for the production of various wood base products has militated a high level of deforestation thereby causing climatic change. In the wood based industries, there is a lot of waste recovering such as saw dust, off cut, stump etc. Due to the demand and increasing population, proper utilization of waste should be encouraged to meet the need of human in other to combat the rate of depletion of forest resources by converting the wood waste to wealth. Studies of recycling wood wastes for block-board are still very rare in the literature (Chamma, 2004). The production of block-board becomes a good option, especially for smaller pieces which are usually discarded into landfills.

 

1.3       AIM AND OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

Considering the significant volume of wood and wood-based products generated as waste, the focus of this research is aiming at utilization of timber waste from saw mill for the production of useable block boards.

The objectives of this research are listed below;

1.              To manufacture block boards from wood species selected within study area.

2.              To determine the physical properties of the manufacture boards, viz Moisture Content (M.C), Density, and Water Absorption Test.

3.              To determine, the mechanicals properties of the boards; Compressive Strength, Impact, and Static Bending Test.

4.              To compare the properties of the manufactured boards with known boards in use.

 

1.4       JUSTIFICATION

It is common knowledge that wood is the most multipurpose raw materials the world has ever known. The decline of forest resource and the problem of global warming have led to serious shortages of the forest resources for mankind. This study seeks to develop appropriate techniques for processing the wood waste materials into value added, useful and marketable products. This will provide solution to the problems of economic underutilization and ecological damage.

When the wood waste materials are used for engineering wood products production such as plywood, block board, etc, the following advantages in utilization will be achieved viz: convenience in use, ease of handling, high market value etc.

The felling of trees and sawing into timber in the forest lead to huge amount of waste wood and this is left unused at the sites which otherwise would have been sawn and re-sawn in the mill to recover as much sawn timber as possible for each tree. In the mill where proper conversion takes place, developed sawing pattern is applied to achieve maximum yield from every log. 


1.5       SCOPE OF STUDY

The study is limited to southern senatorial districts of Cross River State, Nigeria, Precisely Akim Timber Market in Calabar Municipal Local Government Area.  The study covers the production of blockboard from wood waste of Microbrelinia brazzavillensis, Brachystegia eurycoma, and Cedrus. And it will examine certain properties which include Mechanical and Physical properties of the products.


Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.

Review


To Comment


Sold By

ProjectShelve

7731

Total Item

Reviews (8)

  • Anonymous

    2 hours ago

    Fast response and reliable

  • Anonymous

    8 hours ago

    Projects would've alot easier if everyone have an idea of excellence work going on here.

  • Anonymous

    1 day ago

    Very good 👍👍

  • Anonymous

    2 days ago

    Honestly, the material is top notch and precise. I love the work and I'll recommend project shelve anyday anytime

  • Anonymous

    2 days ago

    Well and quickly delivered

  • Anonymous

    2 weeks ago

    I am thoroughly impressed with Projectshelve.com! The project material was of outstanding quality, well-researched, and highly detailed. What amazed me most was their instant delivery to both my email and WhatsApp, ensuring I got what I needed immediately. Highly reliable and professional—I'll definitely recommend them to anyone seeking quality project materials!

  • Anonymous

    2 weeks ago

    Its amazing transacting with Projectshelve. They are sincere, got material delivered within few minutes in my email and whatsApp.

  • TJ

    2 months ago

    ProjectShelve is highly reliable. Got the project delivered instantly after payment. Quality of the work.also excellent. Thank you