NUTRITIONAL EVALUATION AND RELATIVE INTAKE OF GRASS FORAGES FED TO WEST AFRICAN DWARF GOATS IN EARLY RAINY SEASON

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00009318

No of Pages: 94

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦5000

  • $

ABSTRACT


This study was conducted to evaluate the nutritional potential and relative intake of Panicum maximum, Pennisetum purpureum, Andropogon tectorum and Cynodon nlemfuensis by West African Dwarf goats fed with these forages. Six bucks (11 – 12 months old and 6.0 – 8.1 kg weight) were used for the study, which lasted for 14 days. The experiment was conducted using the Completely Randomized Design (CRD). The bucks were first quarantined for 21 days during which they were treated against ecto- and endo-parasites before they were moved to separate cement-floored pens for the experiment. All the forages were harvested in the evening and kept overnight before being fed daily to each buck simultaneously from 9:00 am and water provided ad libitum. Results showed that the grass forages differed significantly (P<0.05) in dry matter (DM), proximate compositions, mineral fractions in addition to energy values, Relative Feed Value (RFV) and in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD). Panicum maximum recorded the highest DM (91.27%), ash (14.26%), EE (1.06%), Relative Preference Index (RPI) (100%) and average daily DMI (592.84 g) and CF (12.63%) and IVOMD (53.43%). Andropogon tectorum recorded the highest CP (12.51%), DCP (8.12%), P (0.338%), Ca (0.297%), Mg (0.374%), K (0.970%), Na (0.217%), Fe (197.71 mg/kg), Cu (9.29 mg/kg), Zn (46.90 mg/kg), Mn (17.40 mg/kg), Co (33.78 mg/kg), Neutral Detergent Fibre (NDF) (67.36%), Acid Detergent Lignin (ADL) (17.23%), ME (7.06 MJ/KgDM) and Total Digestible Nutrient (TDN) (48.37%) and the lowest EE (0.80%), Nitrogen Free Extract (NFE) (49.84%) and RFV (73.05%). Pennisetum purpureum had the highest hemicellulose (24.51%) and RFV (90.19%) and the lowest DM (89.45%), Co (21.20 mg/kg), NDF (61.74%), ADF (37.23%), ADL (11.78%), cellulose (24.46%), ME (5.41 MJ/KgDM) and TDN (39.02%). Cynodon nlemfuensis recorded the highest NFE (53.94%), CF (13.76%) and IVOMD (54.19%) and the lowest CP (10.28%), DCP (6.05%), ash (11.52%), P (0.307%), Ca (0.275%), Mg (0.328%), K (0.933%), Na (0.204%), Fe (192.25 mg/kg), Cu (5.38 mg/kg), Zn (38.96 mg/kg), Mn (11.81 mg/kg), RPI (19%) and average daily DMI (136.15 g). Although the ash, EE, P, Mg, K, Na, Fe, Mn, Zn and Co contents were within the ranges of acceptable quantities for daily goat maintenance and growth; the low CP, Ca, Cu, TDN, RFV and IVOMD coupled with high NDF and ADF contents indicated that the forages were of low quality. The relative preference index and daily average DMI of the forages followed the pattern (Panicum maximum>Andropogon tectorum>Pennisetum purpureum>Cynodon nlemfuensis), which was believed to be largely influenced by their morphology and chemical composition. The RPI, daily average DMI and daily average nutrient intakes from Panicum maximum were significantly higher (P<0.05) than those of Andropogon tectorum, Pennisetum purpureum in that order. The average DMI of the grass forages correlated positively with ash (0.5428)/CP (r = 0.4644)/EE (0.8014*) but negatively with CF (-0.3731). It was concluded that Panicum maximum and Andropogon tectorum have high potential for goat nutrition, while Pennisetum purpureum and Cynodon nlemfuensis have moderate and low potential respectively.









TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

Title page                                                                                                        i

Declaration                                                                                                     ii

Certification                                                                                                   iii

Dedication                                                                                                      iv

Acknowledgements                                                                                        v         

Table of Contents                                                                                           vi

List of Tables                                                                                            viii

List of Figures                                                                                           ix

Abstract                                                                                                    x

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background Information                                                                          1

1.2 Statement of Problem                                                                               3

1.3 Objectives of the Study                                                                            3

1.4 General Objective                                                                                     3

1.5 Specific Objectives                                                                                   3

1.6 Justification                                                                                              3

CHAPTER 2:  LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Origin and Distribution of Domestic Goat                                               5

2.2 Major Breeds of Goats in Nigeria                                                            5

2.2.1 Features and categories of West African dwarf (WAD) goats in

         Nigeria                                                                                                   6

2.3 West African Dwarf Goat Production Systems in Nigeria                      8

2.4 Nutritional Requirement of Goats                                                            9

2.4.1 Energy requirement                                                                               9

2.4.2 Protein requirement                                                                               11

2.4.3 Vitamins and mineral requirements                                                      13

2.4.4 Water requirement                                                                                 15

2.5 Feeding Habit of WAD Goats                                                                              17

2.6 Common Grass Forages Eaten by Goats in Nigeria and their

      Nutritive Value                                                                                         18

2.7 Relative or Voluntary Intake of Forages by Goats and its Influencing

      Factors                                                                                                      24

2.8 Advantages of Goat Production over other Livestock Species                  27

2.9 Important of Goats                                                                                    28

2.10 Food Protein of Goat Origin                                                                   29

CHAPTER 3:  MATERIALS AND METHODS

3.1 Experiment Site                                                                                        31

3.2 Experimental Animals                                                                              31

3.3 Experimental Feeds Collection and Feeding Management                      32

3.4 Experimental Design                                                                                32

3.5 Determination of Relative Intake, Preference and Growth Performance         34

3.6 Determination of Proximate Composition of Experimental Feeds                  34

3.7 Determination of Energy Values of the Gross Forages                            35

3.8 Statistical Analysis                                                                                   36

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1 Proximate composition                                                                             37

4.2 Relative intake; relative preference index and preference ranking

      of the grass forages                                                                                   53

CHAPTER 5

5.1 Conclusion                                                                                                60

5.2 Recommendation                                                                                     61

References                                                                                                62

Appendices                                                                                                     84









LIST OF TABLES


2.1       Accepted macro and micro minerals in a goat diet                               16

3.1       RANDOMIZATION OF OFFER OF THE GRASS FORAGES (PM:

Panicum maximum, PP:Pennisetum purpurem, AT: Andropogon

tectorum, CN: Cynodon nlemfuensis)                                                                 33

 

4.1       Dry matter contents of the grass forages                                               37

4.2       Crude protein, digestive crude protein, ash, ether extract and

nitrogen free extract of the grass forages                                                       40

4.3       Macro-minerals found in the grass forages                                           44

4.4       Micro-minerals found in the grass forages                                            45

4.5       Fibre fractions of the grass forages                                                       48

4.6       Energy values and digestibility of the grass forages                             52

4.7       Dry matter of forages fed to buck                                                         54

4.8       Daily average nutrient intakes of the forages by the bucks                           55

4.9       Simple correlations between average RPI and proximate

composition of the grass forages                                                                    57

4.10     Simple correlations between average DMI and proximate

                        composition of the grass forages                                                                    58

 







 

LIST OF FIGURES


1                      Schematic relationships between different aspects of

nutritive value which influence animal performance                            26

2                      Randomization of offer of the grass forages (PM: Panicum

maximum, PP: Pennisetum purpurem, AT: Andropogon

tectorum; CN: Cynodon nlemfuensis)                                                30


 








 CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1    BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Goats belong to the order Artiodactyla, the family Bovidae and the genus Capra. They were the first domesticated herbivores (Hasse and Zeder, 2000). Today, over 540 breeds of these small ruminants are kept by farmers across the world. The West African Dwarf (WAD) goats are among the three breeds commonly found in Nigeria (Rotimi et al., 2017). These goats are small, blocky and prolific in nature and are able to withstand the harsh tropical climate and tolerate trypanosomiasis, hence their wide distribution in the country (Chiejina et al., 2015). Apart from being a major source of animal protein and income for people, WAD goats also form an integral part of the culture of the people, especially in marital and religious rites (Alikwe et al, 2011), and serve as an insurance against crop failure in many localities (Gefu et al., 1994). The low startup cost, less labour demand, prolific nature and short interval of revenue generation are some of the factors necessitating the production of these goats.

 

Forage refers to leaves and stems of plant species grazed or browsed by ruminants and it includes grass, forbs and shrubs (Kawas et al., 2010). The immense contributions of these plant materials to the nutrition of WAD goats in the country cannot be over-emphasized, as they are valuable for providing dilute sources of nutrients, supplying fibre for rumen digestion and being widely available and more economic than other feeds, particularly during the rainy season. Common grasses that reportedly provide feeds for WAD goats in Nigeria include Panicum maximum (guinea grass), Andropogon tecturom, Pennisetum purpurem and Cynodon nlemfuensis (FAO, 2003; Mlay et al., 2006; Onyeonagu and Eze, 2013; Ojo et al., 2016). While these plant species are part of the ideal natural basis for goat nutrition, various reports (Ogunbosoye and Otukoya, 2014; Ojo et al., 2016; Rusdy, 2016) have shown that their availability, chemical composition, nutritional value, voluntary intake and digestibility can vary with soil type, topography, season, variety and age at which they are harvested. Hence, there is need for regular evaluation of the proximate composition of these browse plants to ascertain their nutritional value and develop a suitable nutrient supplementation plan to ensure good nutrition and improved productivity of WAD goats in the country. This becomes more crucial considering that the nutritive value of tropical grasses fluctuates due to climatic influence (Kawas et al., 2010).

 

Relative intake, which is the amount of dry matter that an animal can voluntarily consume in a day, is also important for evaluating the nutritive value of forages and growth performance of ruminants, as proximate composition alone cannot provide a complete basis ((Kawas et al., 2010)).According to Orskov and Ryce (1990), voluntary intake is a function of forage characteristics, animal, environment and the interaction among these factors. Forage-related factors such as structure, odour and taste largely affect preference/acceptability of the forage (Babayemi and Bamikole, 2006) and this primarily determines the level of rumen fill, which in turn relates to the rate of digestion, passage of fibrous particles from the rumen and the general performance of any ruminant (Fonseca et al., 1998).

 

1.2   STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Over the years WAD goat production in Nigeria has been faced with nutritional challenges due to seasonal variations and inadequate care because production is mostly carried out under low-input systems where little or no care is provided. Consequently the productivity of these goats has remained perpetually low thereby threatening the protein and income needs as well as the wellbeing of the generality of the people. The situation is more worrisome in the southern parts of the country where WAD goat production is a major source of livelihood to the rural people.

 

1.3   OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The broad objective of the study was to evaluate the nutritional potential and relative intake of selected grass forages by West African Dwarf (WAD) goats, while the specific objectives were to:

i.      Determine the chemical composition (fibre fraction, proximate and mineral content) of each of the selected grass forages.

ii.     Estimate gross energy, digestible energy, metabolisable energy, total digestible nutrients, digestible crude protein, organic matter digestibility and relative feed value each of the grass forages.

iii.   Evaluate relative preference and intake of each grass forage by WAD goats.

 

1.4   JUSTIFICATION

A study on nutritional potential and relative intake of Panicum maximum, Pennisetum purpurem, Andropogen tecturum and Cynodon nlemfuensis by WAD goats would help generate information on the nutritional composition of these forages and their preferences by animals especially during the early rainy season when fodder is relatively in abundance in meeting the nutritional requirement of ruminants. It would also help animal nutritionists in planning towards the establishment of pastures in order to optimize the performance of WAD goats.


Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.

Review


To Comment


Sold By

ProjectShelve

7679

Total Item

Reviews (3)

  • Anonymous

    3 days ago

    I am thoroughly impressed with Projectshelve.com! The project material was of outstanding quality, well-researched, and highly detailed. What amazed me most was their instant delivery to both my email and WhatsApp, ensuring I got what I needed immediately. Highly reliable and professional—I'll definitely recommend them to anyone seeking quality project materials!

  • Anonymous

    1 week ago

    Its amazing transacting with Projectshelve. They are sincere, got material delivered within few minutes in my email and whatsApp.

  • TJ

    2 months ago

    ProjectShelve is highly reliable. Got the project delivered instantly after payment. Quality of the work.also excellent. Thank you