LEAF LITTER PRODUCTION, NUTRIENT CYCLING RATES, GROWTH AND YIELD PARAMETERS OF MAIZE (ZEA MAYS L.) IN DIOSPYROS CRASSIFLORA (HIERN FWTA) PLANTATION

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00009430

No of Pages: 272

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦10000

  • $

ABSTRACT

 

Five experiments: leaf litter production, leaf litter decomposition, quantity of precipitation pathways, nutrient cycling of leaf litter and of precipitation pathways, and maize production were conducted in 2016 and 2017 in Diospyros crassiflora plantation in the Humid Forest Research Station, Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria (FRIN), Okwuta-Ibeku, Umuahia, Abia State, Nigeria. A randomised complete block design (RCBD) was used to study the leaf litterfall of Diospyros crassiflora in the D. crassiflora plantation. A 2 x 6 and a 2 x 7 factorial experiment each in RCBD were also conducted in 2016 and 2017 respectively to study the bi-weekly decomposition rates of D. crassiflora in the nursery unit of FRIN. A 3 x 9 x 2   factorial experiment in RCBD was also used to study the quantity of water and nutrient cycling contents of three precipitation pathways overtime in the D. crassiflora plantation. A 3 x 3 factorial experiment in RCBD was used to determine the effect of organic and inorganic fertilizer rates on the growth and yield of Zea mays in a 4 and 5 years old D. crassiflora plantation in 2016 and in 2017, respectively. Result showed that, the dry season months of November- March had leaf litter production of 11.58 – 7.48 kg ha-1 in 2016 and 22.70 -16.10 kg ha-1 in 2017 which were significantly higher than the rainy season months of April-October of 1.98 - 6.03 kg ha-1 in 2016 and 4.80 - 13.00 kg ha-1 in 2017. Total leaf litter decomposition (100%) rates of soil surface-placed and soil-incorporated modes were obtained at the 12thand 14th weeks after leaf litter placement in 2016 and 2017 respectively. The results of nutrient contents in the leaf litters in 2016 and 2017 were statistically similar for both macro and micro-elements (N, P, K, Ca, Na, Mg, Fe, Org. M., Org. C, pH and Pb). In terms of the precipitation pathways stemflow and rainfall had significantly the highest and the least water quantities, respectively. Stemflow pathway in 2016 and 2017 had the highest (p ≤ 0.05) nutrient concentrations of calcium (Ca), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), chlorine (Cl), iron (Fe), lead (Pb) and tetraphosphate. Application of inorganic (NPK 15:15:15) and organic (poultry manure) fertilizer at 0.00kg, 250.00kg, 500.00kg and 0.00t, 2.00t and 4.00t  rates in 2016 and 2017 improved and increased the growth attributes of maize in D. crassiflora plantation. The results of the various rates of fertilizer (F), poultry manure (P) and the fertilizers x poultry manure treatment combinations were not significantly different from each other within the period of study in terms of maize yield attributes. In conclusion, agriculturists, environmentalists and foresters are encouraged to adopt D. crassiflora species in their farming system and plantation establishment because of its values in mineral nutrients. The leaf litter of D. crassiflora should be utilized as one of the main sources of organic manure due to its fast rate of decomposition and consequently its high mineral contents that could be deposited in the soil.







TABLE ON CONTENTS

 

Title page                                                                                                                                                                    i

Certification                                                                                                                                                               ii

Declaration                                                                                                                                                                                                     iii

Dedication                                                                                                                                                                                                      iv

Acknowledgement                                                                                                                                                                                          v

Table of Contents                                                                                                                                                                                           vi

List of Tables                                                                                                                                                                                                  xiii

List of Figures                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            xvii

List of Plates                                                                                                               xviii

List of Acronyms and Abbreviations                                                                                                                                                                           xix

Abstract                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    xxi

 

CHAPTER 1

1.0           INTRODUCTION

1.1       Background Information                                                                                1

1.2       Statement of the Problem                                                                               5

1.3       Objectives of the Study                                                                                  6

1.4       Justification of the Study                                                                                7

1.5       Scope of the Study                                                                                          8

 

CHAPTER 2

2.0       LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1       Leaf litter Production                                                                                     10

2.1.1    Types and sources of leaf litter                                                                      11

2.1.2    Seasonality of leaf litter production                                                               12

2.1.3    Pattern of leaf litter production                                                                      13

2.1.4    Causes of leaf litter production                                                                      14

2.1.4.1 Defoliation                                                                                                      14

2.1.4.2 Climate change                                                                                              15

2.1.4.3 Physical disturbance to forest                                                                        16

2.1.4.4 Stand structure and changes in stand community structure                           16

2.1.4.5   Mechanism of leaf abscission and leaf senescence                                      17

2.1.4.6   Water stress                                                                                                  18

2.1.5    Uses of leaf litter production                                                                          20

2.1.5.1 Restoration of land degraded site/erosion                                                      21

2.1.5.2 Uses of leaf litter production on growth performance of forest species             21

2.1.6    Types of nutrients disposed                                                                            25

2.2       Leaf Litter Decomposition                                                                             26

2.2.1    Decomposition methods                                                                                 30

2.2.2    Nutrient cycling via litterfall                                                                          31

2.2.3    Nutrient cycling via leaf litter decomposition                                                32

2.2.4    Nutrient contents                                                                                            33

2.3       Nutrient Accretion to the Soil                                                                        35

2.3.1    Nutrient accretion through litterfall                                                                35

2.3.2    Nutrient accretion via stemflow and throughfall                                           36  

2.3.3    Morphological characteristics influencing stemflow                                     38

2.3.4    Nutrient cycling through incipient precipitation, stemflow and                         39

throughfall

2.3.5    Nutrient cycling via rainfall (incipient precipitation)                                    41

2.4       Agroforestry System                                                                                       42

2.4.1    Classification of agroforestry systems and practices                                     44

2.4.2    Roles of agroforestry in forest management and carbon cycle                        47

2.4.3    Provision of healthy forest ecosystem                                                            49

2.4.4    Socio-economic benefits                                                                                50

2.4.5    Application of fertilizers on arable crop production in agroforestry                 51

ecosystem

2.4.6    Effect of organic fertilizers on arable crop production in agroforestry     52

            ecosystem

2.4.7    Effect of inorganic fertilizer on crop production in agroforestry ecosystem       54

2.4.8    Combination of inorganic fertilizers and organic fertilizers/manures      55

2.4.9    Plant species used in agroforestry ecosystems                                               56

2.5       Description of the Study Tree Species (Diospyros crassiflora)                        62

2.5.1    Local names of the plant in various parts of the world                                  65

2.5.2    Propagation of Diospyros crassiflora                                                             68

2.5.3    Management of Diospyros crassiflora                                                           69

2.5.4   Importance of Diospyros crassiflor                                                                69

2.6       Origin of Maize (Zea mays L.)                                                                       71

2.6.1    Ecology of maize                                                                                            72

2.6.2    Utilization of maize                                                                                        73

 

CHAPTER 3

3.0       MATERIALS AND METHODS

3.1       Study Location                                                                                               75

3.2       Methodology                                                                                                   79

3.2.1    Stand structure of Diospyros crassiflora plantation                                       79

            at Okwuta-Ibeku, Umuahia, Nigeria

3.2.1.1 Observation of the flowering and fruiting of Diospyros crassiflora                   80

            for the 2016 and 2017 study periods.

3.2.2    Experiment 1:  Leaf litterfall studies of D. crassiflora in 2016 and 2017    82

3.3.3    Experiment 2: leaf litter decomposition studies                                             84

3.2.3.1 Leaf litter placement methods                                                                        84

3.2. 3.1a. Surface-placed leaf litter                                                                            84

3.2.3.1b Soil-incorporated leaf litter study                                                                 85

3.2.4    Experiment 3: Nutrient cycling through precipitation pathways at                        88

            Okwuta-Ibeku, Umuahia

3.2.4    Experiment 4: Maize (var. OBA- super) production in D. crassiflora       90

            based agroforestry ecosystem in Okwuta- Ibeku, Umumahia,

Abia State.

3. 2.4.1 Growth characteristics of maize plants                                                         91

3.2.4.2  Yield characteristics of maize plants in D. crassiflora agroforestry     94

ecosystem

3.2.5.1 Litter half-life and full-life estimations                                                          97

3.2.5.2 Litter turnover coefficient                                                                             97

3.2.5.3 Relative leaf litter disappearance rate (% day -1 sampling interval-1)                     98

3.2.6    Physico-chemical analysis of leaf litter nutrient contents                              98

3.2.7    Nutrient analysis of rainfall (incipient precipitation), throughfall and      99

stemflow

3.5       Statistical analysis and computation procedures                                            101

CHAPTER 4

4.0       RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1       Results                                                                                                            102

4.1.1   Leaf litterfall of Diospyros crassiflora                                                           102

4.1.2    Leaf Litter Decomposition Rates of Diospyros crassiflora                           105

4.1.2.1 Cumulative leaf litter decomposition rates in 2016 and 2017                        105

4 .1.2.2 Relative decay rates (% day -1) for soil incorporated and soil                         107

            surface placed leaf litters in 2016 and 2017

4.1.2.3 Regression equation parameters, observed leaf litter decomposition             110

rates, expected times for 100% (full life) and 50% (half life) leaf litter

decomposition and the correlation coefficients of the two leaf litter

placement modes of Diospyros crassiflora leaf litter in 2016 and 2017

in Umuahia, Nigeria

                        112

            crassiflora plantation.

4.1.3.2 Phophorus (P) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros                         114

            crassiflora plantation.

4.1.3.3 Potassium (K) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros                         115

            crassiflora in a plantation.

4.1.3.4 Sodium (Na) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros                         117

            crassiflora plantation.

4.1.3.5 Calcium (Ca) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros                         119

crassiflora in a plantation. 4.3.6 Magnesium (Mg) (mg l-1) contents

of the leaf litter of Diospyros crassiflora in a plantation.

4.1.3.6 Magnesium (Mg) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros                         121

crassiflora in a plantation.

4.1.3.7 Chlorine (Cl) contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros crassiflora                         123

plantation at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.3.8 Organic Matter (Org. M) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of                         125

            Diospyros crassiflora plantation at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.3.9 Organic Carbon (Org. C) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of                         127

            Diospyros crassiflora in a plantation at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.3.10 Iron (Fe) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros crassiflora       129

            in a plantation at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.3.11pH values contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros crassiflora in a                         130

plantation at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.3.12 Cadmium (Cd) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros                         132

crassiflora in a plantation at Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.3.13 Lead (Pb) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros crassiflora       133

in a plantation at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.4:   Nutrient Cycling Through Precipitation Pathways: Rainfall,                         135

Stemflow and Throughfall

4.1.4.1 Quantity of water (mm) overtime (months) of various precipitation    135

pathways in D. crassiflora Plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria in 2016

and 2017

4.1.4.1a Nitrate (mg l-1) contents of water of precipitation pathways over time     138

(month) (March – November) in 2016 and 2017 at Diospyros crassiflora plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.1b Nitrate (mg l-1) contents of three precipitation pathways in 2016 and      139

2017 at Diospyros crassiflora plantation, Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.1c Nitrate (mg l -1) contents of water of various precipitation pathways         140

over time (months) in Diospyros crassoflora plantation, in Umuahia,

Nigeria.

4...4.1d Nitrate contents (mg l-1) of treatment interactions of three                           141

Precipitation pathways overtime (months) in the two study periods

(Years) in 2016 and 2017 at Umuahia, Nigeria                                             

4.1.4.2a Tetraphosphate (mg l-1) contents of water of precipitation pathways         142

over time (month) (March – November) in 2016 and 2017 at Diospyros crassiflora plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.2b Tetraphosphate contents (mg l-1) of three precipitation pathways in         144      2016 and 2017at Diospyros crassiflora plantation, Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.5.2cTetraphosphate contents (mg l-1) of water of three precipitation                         145

pathways over time (months) in Diospyros crassiflora plantation,

in Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.5.2d Tetraphosphate contents (mg l-1) of treatment interactions of three    147      Precipitation pathways overtime (9 months) in the two study periods

(Years) in 2016 and 2017 at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.4.3a Potassium (K) (mg l-1) contents of water of precipitation pathways         149

over time (months) (March–November) in 2016 and 2017 at Diospyros crassiflora plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.3b Potassium (mg l-1) contents in three Precipitation pathways in 2016    151

and 2017 at Diospyros crassiflora plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.4.3c Potassium (K) (mg l-1) contents of water of three precipitation pathways         152

overtime (months) in Diospyros crassoflora plantation, in Umuahia,

Nigeria.

4.1.4.3d Potassium (K) (mg l -1) contents of treatment interactions of three                153

Precipitation pathways overtime (9 months) in the two study periods

(Years) in 2016 and 2017 at Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.4a Sodium (Na) (mg l-1) contents of water of precipitation pathways                         155

over time (months) (March – November) in 2016 and 2017 at

Diospyros crassiflora in Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.4.4b Sodium (Na) (mg l-1) contents of three precipitation pathways in 2016    156

and 2017 at Diospyros crassiflora plantation, Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.4c Sodium (Na) (mg l-1) contents of water of various precipitation                         157

pathways over time (months) in Diospyros crassiflora plantation,

in Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.4d Sodium (Na) (mg l -1) contents in three Precipitation pathways                         159      overtime (months) in the two study periods (Years) in 2016 and 2017

at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.4.5a Calcium (Ca) (mg l-1) contents of water of precipitation pathways                     161

over time (months) (March–November) in 2016 and 2017 at Diospyros crassiflora plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.5b Calcium (mg l-1) contents in three Precipitation pathways in 2016 and         162

2017 at Diospyros crassiflora plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.4.5c Calcium (Ca) (mg l -1) contents of water of various precipitation                         163

pathways over time (months) in Diospyros crassiflora plantation in

Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.5d Calcium (Ca) contents (mg l -1) of treatment interactions of three                         164

Precipitation pathways overtime (months) in two study periods (Years)

in 2016 and 2017 at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.4.6a Magnesium (mg l-1) contents of precipitation pathways over time                 166

(months) (March–November) in 2016 and 2017 at Diospyros

crassiflora plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.6b Magnesium (Mg) (mg l-1) contents of three Precipitation pathways in     167

2016 and 2017 at Diospyros crassiflora plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.4.6c Magnesium (Mg) contents (mg l-1) of three precipitation pathways         168

over time (months) in a Diospyros crassiflora plantation in Umuahia,

Nigeria.

4.1.4.6d Magnesium (Mg) contents (mg l-1) of treatment interactions of three    170

            Precipitation pathways overtime (9 months) in the two study periods

(Years) in 2016 and 2017 in D. crassiflora in Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.4.7a Chlorine (Cl) contents of water of three precipitation pathways over     171

time (9 months) (March–November) in 2016 and 2017 at Diospyros

crassiflora plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.7b Chlorine (Cl) (mg l-1) contents of three precipitation pathways in 2016    173

and 2017 in Diospyros crassiflora plantation, Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.14.7c Chlorine (Cl) (mg l-1) contents of water of various precipitation                         174

pathways over time (months) in Diospyros crassoflora plantation,

in Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.7d Chlorine (Cl) (mg l-1) contents of treatment interactions of three                         175

Precipitation pathways overtime (9 months) in the two study periods

years in 2016 and 2017 in Diospyros crassiflora in Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.4.8a: Iron (Fe) contents (mg l-1) of water of precipitation pathways over time         177

(9 month) (March–November) in 2016 and 2017 in Diospyros crassiflora

plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.8b:Iron (Fe) (mg l-1) contents in three precipitation pathways in 2016 and         179

2017 at Diospyros crassiflora agroforestry ecosystem in Umuahia,

Nigeria.

4.1.4.8c Iron (Fe) (mg l -1) contents of water of three precipitation pathways         180

overtime (months) in Diospyros crassiflora plantation in 2016 and

2017 at Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.8d Iron (Fe) contents (mg l-1) of treatment interactions of three                         182

Precipitation pathways overtime (9 months) in the two study periods

(Years) in 2016 and 2017 at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.4.9a pH values of water of precipitation pathways over time (month)                         183

(March–November) in 2016 and 2017 at Diospyros crassiflora

plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria.

March –           186

November) in 2016 and 2017 at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.4.9d pH values in three Precipitation pathways overtime (9 months) in         187

two study Years (2016 and 2017) at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.4.10a Lead (Pb) (mg l-1) contents precipitation pathways (March–November)      189

in 2016 and 2017 at Diospyros crassiflora plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria           

4.1.4.10b Lead (Pb) (mg l-1) contents of three Precipitation pathways in 2016 and         190

2017 in Diospyros crassiflora plantation at Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.10c Lead (mg l -1) contents of three Precipitation pathways March-                         191

November) in 2016 2017 in Diospyros crassoflora plantation, in

Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.10d  Lead (mg l-1) contents in three Precipitation pathways overtime                      192

 (9 months) in the two study periods (Years) in 2016 and 2017 at

Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.1.5 Maize Production in D. crassiflora Based Agroforestry Ecosystem                   193

in Umuahia

4.1.5.1 Plant parameters {plant height (cm), plant diameter (cm), crown                         193

            diameter (cm) and crown depth (cm)} of Diospyros crassiflora

            agroforestry ecosystem in December, 2015, 2016 and 2017.

4.1.5.2 Physico-chemical properties of soil and poultry manure samples                         194

before and after experiment in Diospyros crassiflora agroforestry

ecosystem in 2016 and 2017 at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.5.3 Effect of inorganic fertilizer (NPK 15:15:15) and poultry manure                         196

on plant height (m) of maize (Zea mays L.) in 2016 and 2017 in  a

Diospyros crassiflora ecosystem

4.1.5.4 Effect of inorganic fertilizer (NPK 15: 15: 15) and poultry manure                        198

rates on leaf number of maize (Zea mays L.) in 2016 and 2017 in a

Diospyros crassiflora agroforestry ecosystem

4.1.5.5 Effect of inorganic fertilizer (NPK 15:15:15) and poultry manure                         201

on plant diameter (cm) of maize (Zea mays L.) in 2016 and 2017 in a

Diospyros crassiflora agroforestry ecosystem

4.1.5.6 Effect of inorganic (NPK 15:15:15) and poultry manure fertilizer rates     204

on the number of sub-tassels and length of main tassels (cm) of maize

(Zea mays L.) in 2016 and 2017 in Diospyros crassiflora agroforestry

ecosystem

4.1.6.   Yield Characteristics of Maize Plants in D. crassiflora agroforestry     206

Ecosystem

4.1.6.1 Effect of inorganic fertilizer (NPK 15:15:15) and poultry manure                         206

            rates on number of cobs per plant, number of seeds per cob and

            diameter of ears per cob (mm)  of maize (Zea mays L. ) at the 12th weeks

after planting in 2016 and 2017 in Diospyros crassiflora agroforestry

ecosystem

4.1.6.2 Effect of inorganic (NPK 15:15:15) and poultry manure fertilizer                         208

            rates on diameter of cobs (mm), kernel depth (cm) and length of ears

            (cm) of maize (Zea mays L.) at 12th weeks after planting in 2016 and 2017.

4.1.6.3 Effect of inorganic fertilizer (NPK 15:15:15) and poultry manure                         210

            fertilizer rates on number of roots, roots length (cm) and roots depth (cm)

of maize (Zea mays L.) at 12th week after planting in 2016 and 2017 in

Diospyros crassiflora agroforestry ecosystem

4.1.6.4 Effect of inorganic fertilizer (NPK 15:15:15) and poultry manure rates     213

            on dry weights of cobs (kg) and dry weight of roots (kg) of maize

           (Zea mays L.) in 2016 and 2017 in Dioaspyros crassiflora agroforestry

ecosystem

4.2.7    Discussion                                                                                                       215

4.1.7.1 Leaf litter fall of Diospyros crassiflora                                                          215

4.1.7.2 Cumulative Leaf Litter Decompostion Rates                                                 217

4.1.7.3 Relative decay/disappearance rates                                                                219

4.1.7.4 Regression equation parameters, observed leaf litter decomposition             220

rates, expected times for 100% (full life) and 50% (half life) losses              

and te correlation coefficients of the two leaf litter placement modes

of Diospyros crassiflora leaf litter in 2016 and 2017 in Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.7.5 Quantity of water and nutrient cycling through precipitation pathways         222

4.1.7.6 Maize production in D. crassiflora based agroforestry ecosystem in         225

Umuahia

 

CHAPTER 5

5.0       CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1       Conclusion                                                                                                      229

5.1       Recommendations                                                                                          230

            References                             






LIST OF TABLES

 

2.1.5.2: Beneficial effects of tree based agroforestry system                                     23

2.4.9a:  Preferred agroforestry species in Nigeria                                                      59

2.4.9b:  Preferred agroforestry species in Cameroon                                                 60

2.4.9c:  Preferred agroforestry species in Ghana                                                                                                                                61

3.0:      Monthly climatic variables in 2016 and 2017 at the study site in                77

            the humid forest research station, Forestry Research Institute

            of Nigeria (FRIN), Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.1:  Mean monthly leaf litter production of Diospyros crassiflora                     104

            plantation in 2016 and 2017 at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.2.1: Leaf litter decomposition percentages of Diospyros crassiflora at                         106

two leaf litter placement methods over period (weeks after

leaf litter placement) in 2016 and 2017

4.1.2.2: Relative decay rates (% day -1) for soil incorporated and surface                         109

placed leaf litter in 2016 and 2017

4.1.2.3: Regression equation parameters observed leaf litter decomposition             111

           rates, expected times for 100% (full life) and 50% (half life) losses

           and the correlation coefficients of two leaf litter placement

           modes of Diospyros crassiflora leaf litter in 2016 and 2017 in

           Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.3.1: Nitrogen (N) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros                     113

crassiflora in a plantation

4.1.3.2: Phosphorus (P) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros                 114      crassiflora in a plantation.

4.1.3.3: Potassium (K) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros                   116

crassiflora in a plantaion

4.1.3.4: Sodium (Na) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros                     118

crassiflora in a plantation.

4.1.3.5: Calcium (Ca) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros                    120

crassiflora in a plantation.

4.1.3.6: Magnesium (Mg) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros                         122

crassiflora plantation at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.3.7: Chlorine (Cl) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros                     124

crassiflora in a plantation at Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.3.8: Organic Matter (Org. M) contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros                         126

crassiflora in a plantation at Umuahia, Nigeria.                                           

4.1.3.9: Organic Carbon (Org. C) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of                   128

 Diospyros crassiflora in a plantation at Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.3.10: Iron (Fe) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros crassiflora in   129

a plantation at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.3.11: pH-value contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros crassiflora in                        131

a plantation at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.3.12: Cadmium (Cd) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros                        132

crassiflora in a plantation at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.3.13 Lead (Pb) (mg l-1) contents of the leaf litter of Diospyros crassiflora in a            134

plantation at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.4.1: Quantity of water (mm) overtime (months) of various precipitation    137

            pathways in D. crassiflora plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria in 2016 and

            2017.

 4.1.4.1a: Nitrate (mg l-1) contents of water of precipitation pathways over time     138

(month) (March–November) in 2016 and 2017 at Diospyros crassiflora

plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.4.1c: Nitrate (mg l -1) contents of water of various precipitation pathways         140

           overtime (months) in Diospyros crassoflora plantation, in Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.1d:Nitrate contents of treatment interactions of three precipitation                  141

            pathways overtime (months) in the two study periods (Years) in

            2016 and 2017 at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.4.2a: Tetraphosphate (mg l-1) contents of water of precipitation pathways over             143

time (month) (March – November) in 2016 and 2017 at Diospyros

crassiflora plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria.  and 2017 in Diospyros crassiflora plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.2c: Tetraphosphate (mg l -1) contents of water of various precipitation    146

pathways over time (months) in Diospyros crassoflora plantation, in

Umuahia, Nigeria. 

4.1.4.2d: Tetraphosphate (mg l -1) contents of treatment interactions of three    148

Precipitation pathways overtime (9 months) in the two study periods

(Years) in 2016 and 2017 at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.4.3a: Potassium (K) (mg l-1) contents of water of precipitation pathways over             150

time (month) (March – November) in 2016 and 2017 at Diospyros

crassiflora plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria.

and 2017 at Diospyros crassiflora plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria              

4.1.4.3c: Potassium (K) (mg l -1) contents of water of three precipitation                 152

pathways over time (months) in Diospyros crassoflora plantation, in

Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.3d: Potassium (K) (mg l -1) content of treatment interactions of three                        154

Precipitation pathways overtime (months) in the two study periods

(Years) in 2016 and 2017 at Umuahia, Nigeria.    

4.1.4.4a: Sodium (Na) (mgl-1) contents of water of precipitation pathways over     155

time (months) (March – November) in 2016 and 2017 at Diospyros

crassiflora in Umuahia, Nigeria 2016 and 2017at Diospyros crassiflora plantation, Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.4c: Sodium (Na) (mg l -1) contents of water of various precipitation            158

 pathways over time (months) in Diospyros crassoflora plantation, in

Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.4d: Sodium (Na) (mg l -1) contents in three Precipitation pathways overtime          160

(months) in the two study periods (Years) in 2016 and 2017 at

Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.5a: Calcium (Ca) (mg l-1) contents of precipitation pathways over time     161

(month) (March–November) in 2016 and 2017 at Diospyros

crassiflora plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.5b: Calcium (mg l-1) contents in three Precipitation pathways in 2016                        162

and 2017 at Diospyros crassiflora plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.4.5c: Calcium (Ca) (mg l -1) contents of water of various precipitation                        163

 pathways over time (months) in Diospyros crassiflora plantation in

Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.5d: Calcium (Ca) contents (mg l -1) in three Precipitation pathways                         165

            over time (months) in the two study periods (Years) in 2016 and 2017 at

Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.6c:Magnesium (mg l -1) contents of water of various precipitation pathways         169

overtime (months) in a Diospyros crassiflora plantation in Umuahia,

Nigeria.

4.1.4.6d: Magnesium (mg l-1) in three Precipitation pathways overtime (months)          170

in the two study periods (Years) in 2016 and 2017 at Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.7a Chlorine (Cl) contents of water of three precipitation pathways over time         172

(9 month) (March–November) in 2016 and 2017 at Diospyros crassiflora

plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria.

tion            174

pathways over time (9 months) in Diospyros crassoflora

plantation, in Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.8a: Iron (Fe) contents (mg l-1) of precipitation pathways over time (months)          178

(March–November) in 2016 and 2017 in Diospyros crassiflora plantation

in Umuahia, Nigeria.

time     181

(months) in Diospyros crassiflora plantation in 2016 and 2017 at

Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.8d Iron (Fe) contents (mg l-1) of treatment interactions of three Precipitation    182

pathways overtime (9 months) in the two study periods (Years) in 2016

and 2017 at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.4.9a: pH values of water of precipitation pathways over time                             184

(months: March–November) in 2016 and 2017 at Diospyros crassiflora

plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria.

months:                        186

March-November) in 2016 and 2017 at Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.9d pH values in three Precipitation pathways overtime (9 months) in                        188

two study Years (2016 and 2017) at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.4.10a Lead (Pb) (mg l-1) contents precipitation pathways                                    189

(March–November) in 2016   and 2017

 at Diospyros crassiflora plantation in Umuahia, Nigeria                             190

4.1.4.10b Lead (Pb) (mg l-1) contents of three Precipitation pathways in 2016

 and 2017 in Diospyros crassiflora plantation at Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.10c Lead (mg l -1) contents of three Precipitation pathways March-                         191

November) in 2016 2017 in Diospyros crassoflora plantation, in

Umuahia, Nigeria.

4.1.4.10d Lead (mg l-1) contents in three Precipitation pathways overtime                         192

(9 months) in the two study periods (Years) in 2016 and 2017 at

Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.5.1 Plant parameters {plant height (cm), plant diameter (cm), crown diameter          193

(cm) and crown depth (cm)} of Diospyros crassiflora agroforestry

ecosystem in December, 2015, 2016 and 2017.

4.1.5.2 Physico-chemical properties of soil and poultry manure samples before 195

and after experiment in Diospyros crassiflora agroforestry ecosystem in

2016 and 2017 at Umuahia, Nigeria

4.1.5.3 Effect of inorganic fertilizer (NPK 15:15:15) and poultry manure on plant           197

height (m) of maize (Zea mays L.) in 2016 and 2017 in  a Diospyros

crassiflora ecosystem

4.1.5.4 Effect of inorganic fertilizer (NPK 15: 15: 15) and poultry manure                         200

rates on leaf number of maize (Zea mays L.) in 2016 and 2017 in a

Diospyros crassiflora agroforestry ecosystem

4.1.5.5 Effect of inorganic fertilizer (NPK 15:15:15) and poultry manure on        203

plant diameter (cm) of maize (Zea mays L.) in 2016 and 2017 in a

Diospyros crassiflora agroforestry ecosystem

4.1.5.6 Effect of inorganic (NPK 15:15:15) and poultry manure fertilizer rates    205

on the number of sub-tassels and length of main tassels (cm) of

maize (Zea mays L.) in 2016 and 2017 in Diospyros crassiflora

agroforestry ecosystem

4.1.6.1 Effect of inorganic fertilizer (NPK 15:15:15) and poultry manure rates     207

on number of cobs per plant, number of seeds per cob and diameter of

ears per cob (mm)  of maize (Zea mays L.)  at the 12th weeks after planting

in 2016 and 2017 in Diospyros crassiflora agroforestry ecosystem

4.1.6.2 Effect of inorganic (NPK 15:15:15) and poultry manure fertilizer rates on            209

diameter of cobs (mm), kernel depth (cm) and length of ears (cm) of

maize (Zea mays L.) at 12th weeks after planting in 2016 and 2017.

4.1.6.3 Effect of inorganic fertilizer (NPK 15:15:15) and poultry manure                         212

fertilizer rates on number of roots, roots length (cm) and roots depth

(cm) of maize (Zea mays L.) at 12th week after planting in 2016 and

2017 in Diospyros crassiflora agroforestry ecosystem

4.1.6.4 Effect of inorganic fertilizer (NPK 15:15:15) and poultry manure                        214

rates on dry weights of cobs (kg) and dry weight of roots (kg) of maize

(Zea mays L.) in 2016 and 2017 in Dioaspyros crassiflora

agroforestry ecosystem     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIST OF FIGURES

 

3.1.1:   Map of Abia State, Nigeria and the Study Site at Okwuta-Ibeku,                         78

Umuahiain Umuahia North Local Government Area (L.G.A.).

 







LIST OF PLATES 

 

1a:       Determination of plant height                                                                         81

1b:       Determination of plant diameter                                                                     81

1c:       Determination of crown diameter                                                                   81

1d:       Determination of crown depth                                                                        81

2a:       Clearing of experimental site                                                                         83

2b:       Prepared litter trays                                                                                        83

2c:       Litters in tray                                                                                                  83

3a:       Filling of polypots                                                                                          87                             3b:          Arrangement of polypots                                                                                    87

3c:       Watering of Polypots                                                                                      87

3d:       Extraction of leaf litter                                                                                   87

4a:       Litter tray and containers for stenflow and throughfall                                 89

4b:       Connecting hose to species for stem flow                                                      89

4c:       Measurement of stemflow                                                                              89

4d:       Samples of incipient precipitation pathways for analysis                              89

5a:       D. crassiflora plantation                                                                                 92

5b:       Demarcation and pegging of plots                                                                  92

5c:       Planting of Zea mays (maize)                                                                         92

5d:       Zea mays at 6 weeks                                                                                       92

6a:       Data collection of maize height using 100cm wooden ruler                        93

6b:       Measurement of length of the main tassel                                                      93

6c:       Counting of sub- tassels                                                                                  93

7a:       Counting of roots                                                                                            96

7b:       Measurement of ear length                                                                             96

7c:       Measurement ear diameter                                                                             96

7d:       Counting of seeds per cob                                                                              96

7e:       Weighing of cobs                                                                                            96


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

 

AAS: Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer

AgNO3: Silver Nitric iii Oxide

AOAC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists

APHA: America Public Health Association

Aug.: August

BS%: Base Saturations Percentage

C: Carbon

C mol kg-1:  Concentration of mole per kilogram

Ca:  Calcium

CEC: Cation Exchange Capacity

Cm: Centimetre

CNREM: College of Natural Resources and Environmental Management

CO: Carbon ii Oxide

CO2: Carbon iv Oxide

DBH: Diameter Breast Height

DEC.: December

D. crassiflora:Diospyroscrassiflora

EA:  Exchangeable acidity

ECEC: Effective cation exchange capacity

EDTA:  Ethylene diaminetetra-acetic

F- LSD:  Fisher`s Least Significant Difference

FMANR: Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources

FOREM:  Forestry and Environmental Management

FRIN:  Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria

FWTA:  Flora of West Tropical Africa

g:  gram

gkg-1: gram per kilogram

HOD: Head of Department

H2SO4: Tetraoxosulphate vi oxide

HCl:  Hydrochloric acid

ICRAF:  International Centre for Research and Agroforestry

IF: Inorganic Fertilizer

IF + PM: Inorganic Fertilizer + Poultry Manure

IPCC: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

K: Potassium

M x P: Month x Precipitation

Mg: Magnesium

MOUAU: Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike

MPTs: Multi-Purpose Tree Species

N: Nitrogen

NEARLS: National Agricultural Extension and Research Liaison Services

NH4: Ammonium

NO3: Nitrate Oxide

NPK: Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium

NRCRI: National Root Crops Research Institute

NS: Not significant

Org. C: Organic Carbon

Org. M: Organic matter

P: Phosphorus

PGS: Post Graduate School

pH: Hydrogen ion concentration

PM: Poultry Manure

PPM: Parts per million

Prec.: Precipitation pathway

RCBD: Randomised Complete Block Design

SOM C: Soil Organic Matter Carbon

TEM: Terrestrial Ecosystem Model

WALP: Weeks after litter placement

WAP: Weeks after planting

 



 

CHAPTER ONE

1.0         INTRODUCTION

1.1         BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Ajah (2006) noted that transformation and movement of materials within soil organic matter pools is a process influenced by climatic factors (rainfall, temperature, sunshine, relative humidity and wind), soil type, vegetation and soil organisms. It is possible to trace the cyclic movement of these essential chemical elements through the biosphere towards determing the interdependencies that exist among them. The cycles involve both physical (dissolution, precipitation, volatization and fixation) and chemical (synthesis, degradation and oxidation-reduction). Forests improve the microclimate by reducing the change caused by wind, protecting soil against erosion and restoring soil productivity. Tree crops result in significant improvement in soil fertility through the addition of plant litter, nutrient cycling, biological nitrogen fixation, permeability, and water holding capacity, aggregate stability and soil temperature regimes (Aluko, 2001). Deforestation results in changing the status of the forest soil. In tropical rain forests, multi-purpose tree species (MPTs) are found to exert considerable influence on soil properties (Lal et al., 1975).

Lal et al. (1975) stated that soil nutrient status could be improved through nutrient cycling in terms of litterfall, litter decomposition and mineralization. This phenomenon cannot occur without forest cover. Forests, especially protected, ones ensure environmental sustainability and conserve biological resources for future generations (Thies and Pfeil, 2004).

Increasing human population places greater demand on forests for wood and non- wood resources which consequently results to rapid decline in the existing forest estates (Ogbonna and Nzegbule, 2010).  Otorokpo (2012) noted that due to increasing pressure, bush fallow periods are short and soil fertility is highly reduced. Low crop yields are obtained when food crops are planted on farmlands with reduced soil fertility, continuous cropping and low organic matter contents. The key component of shifting cultivation system is the recycling of plant nutrients through the addition of above and below ground biomass of the fallow vegetation (Otorokpo, 2012). Bush fallow system in the tropics accumulates large biomass and enriches soil fertility. Nwoboshi, (1975) explained that for optimal growth, plant requires essential nutrient elements such as potassium (K), magnesium (Mg) and calcium (Ca). The fertility and productivity of the soil depend partly on the soil’s capacity to hold these cations on particles of soil and to exchange them from hydrogen and other ions obtained from the soil or plant roots. The property that enables the soil to perform this unique function is the cation exchange capacity (CEC) (Nwoboshi, 1975). Several studies have been carried out to quantify the rate of leaf litter decomposition which is a major pathway for the transfer of organic matter and nutrients in the soil within the forest ecosystemsAccording to Liebig`s law of the minimum, nutrient that can limit plant growth is an essential plant nutrient, especially if the plant cannot complete its full life cycle without it (Foster and Bahatti, 2006). There are two groups of nutrient elements, namely: (a) major, essential or macro- nutrients and (b) minor, non- essential or micro-nutrients. This classification is due to their relative abundance and usefulness in plants.

According to Otorokpo (2012) and Tisdale et al. (2003) macro- nutrients can be broken into two more groups, namely: primary and secondary nutrients. The primary macro- nutrients are: nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), whereas the secondary macro-nutrients are: calcium (Ca), sulphur (S) and magnesium (Mg) (Foster and Bhatti, 2006; Evans, 1992; Ken, 1986).

Tisdale et al. (2003) reported that macro-nutrients are consumed in large quantities and are present in plant tissues in quantities ranging from 0.2% to 4.0% on a dry weight content. These primary macro-nutrients are often lacking in the soil mainly because plants use large quantities of these macronutrients for their growth and survival. Secondary macro nutrients which are always enough in the soil do not always require fertilizer application.

Micro-nutrients {chlorine (Cl), manganese (Mn), boron (Bo), iron (Fe), copper (Cu), molybdenum (Mo), and zinc (Zn)} are those essential elements that plants need for growth but in relatively small quantities. Organic matters are excellent ways of supplying micro-nutrients to the soil. According to Tisdale et al. (2003), micronutrients are present in plant tissues in quantities that are measured in parts per million (ppm), and range from 5 to 200ppm or that are less than 0.02% of their dry weights. Evans (1992) observed that green plants obtain essential elements from the soil through their roots and from the air through their leaves.

Leaf litter is  important in forest ecology because it helps to return nutrients to the soil through nutrient recycling and consequently, maintains soil fertility (Nzegbule and Mbakwe, 2001). Decomposition of leaf litter is the major source of nutrients in forest ecosystems. Litterfall undergoes microbial decomposition; organically bound nutrients are released as free ions to the soil and are consequently made available for plant uptake (Okeke and Omaliko, 1992). The organic matter serves as nutrient source for the release of nutrient elements. Organic matter enhances the release of nutrients in the forest ecosystem, thus preventing loss of nutrients from the ecosystem. Naturally, leaf litter helps to improve the soil structure, increase the water holding capacity, conserve moisture content,  reduce leaching and water infiltration in the soil.

Efforts are, therefore, made to restore more sustainable and productive land-use systems, such as agroforestry, for increased crop and soil productivity per unit area on small farms and also to maintain ecological balance on the long - term basis through the inclusion of forest food species (Kang et al., 1981). Agroforestry is defined as a multiple land use system in which woody perennials are integrated with crops and animals simultaneously or sequentially on the same land unit area, using management systems that are compatible with the culture of the local people (Nair, 1989). Such woody perennials not only raise the protein requirements of the rural populace but also contribute to improving the physico-chemical conditions of the soil among other valuable services rendered (Prassed et al., 1985). Goor and Vari (1985) and Nair (1989) noted that soils under trees (woody perennials) have high utilization capacity and infiltration rates and also enhance the soil productivity.

There is therefore, the need to evaluate the agroforestry utilization potentials of trees and shrubs with respect to:  soil conservation and management, including soil fertility enhancement. Okeke and Omaliko (1991) emphasized the importance of utilizing agroforestry ecosystems for efficient and cheap forms of nutrient are cycling with minimal dependence on costly fertilizers in a low-technology and low- resource agriculture characteristic of many developing nations. This study focuses on the leaf litter production, nutrient cycling rates and growth performaance and yield parameters of photo-period insensitive arable (Maize - Zea mays L) in Diospyros crassiflora (Hiern–FWTA) Plantation in Okwuta-Ibeku, Umuahia, Abia State, Nigeria

1.2       STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Litter fall, leaf litter decomposition and nutrient cycling in tree species are continuous processes which are absolutely slow to meet up with the short period of bush fallow system. The increasing human population has placed greater demand on tropical forests for agricultural crops and other tangible and non- tangible forest products. Okeke and Omaliko (1991) noted that increase in human population in developing countries has contributed to the reduction of fallow periods, declining soil fertility and low productivity of plant products in terms of quality and quantity to sustain the ever-growing population. Tropical forests accumulate huge quantities of nutrients. The efficient cycling of nutrients from the soil to the biomass and back to the soil enables tropical forests to grow on relatively infertile acid soils of the humid tropics (Otorokpo, 2012). Unsustainable methods of harvesting tangible and non- tangible forest products result in major disruptions of nutrient cycling because large quantities of nutrients are removed from the system.

Leaf litter production and nutrient cycling in bush fallow systems are efficient and cheap means of nutrient cycling for crop production with minimal dependence on costly fertilizers in a low technology and low resources agriculture characteristic of many developing countries (Okeke and Omaliko, 1991).  Costly inorganic fertilizers have some adverse effect on soil pH, nutrient mineralization and crop production. Nutrient depletion can be offset by fertilizer application but this sometimes results in increased population of ground waters and algal blooms in streams (Otorokpo, 2012).

Soil fertility depletion is the fundamental biophysical reason for the declining per capita food production in small holder farms in Africa (Sanchez et al., 1995). Sanchez and Palm (1996) reported that agricultural system differs from natural systems in one fundamental aspect. There is a net output of nutrients from the soil through harvesting of crops. The nutrient removal can create net negative balances if nutrients are not replaced (Otorokpo, 2012). Nair (1987, 1983,) advanced some hypotheses with regards to the adverse effects of nutrient removal on soils of tree-based systems in general and in agroforestry ecosystem, in particular. These include:

a.         competition for moisture and nutrients;

b.         production of growth inhibitors;

c.         loss of nutrients through tree harvesting;

d.         possible adverse effect on soil erosion.

With all these issues at stake, it is necessary to determine the effective management of environment and soil fertility in order to sustain adequate food and other forest products.  Studies on leaf litter production and nutrient cycling potentials of tree-based agroforestry systems are scarce. There is equally lack of interest in Diospyros crassiflora tree establishment, especially in monocultures despite its commercial potentials. Presently, there is little or no information on leaf litter production potentials of D. crassiflora. Besides, there has been no research information on the performance of arable crops, especially in D. crassiflora- based agroforestry ecosystems.

1.3   OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The broad objective of this study is the assessment of the leaf litter production and nutrient cycling of D. crassiflora in an agroforestry ecosystem in Okwuta-Ibeku, Umuahia, Abia State, Nigeria.

The specific objectives of the study are to:

1               Estimate the leaf litter production rates of a 4 and 5 year - old Diospyros crassiflora in 2016 and 2017 respectively;

2               Determine the nutrient contents in the leaf litter of D. crassiflora;

3               Assess the leaf litter decomposition rates of D. crassiflora  overtime (weeks after litter placement – WALP);

4               Determine the total nutrient accretion of the species to the soil through leaf litter production and also through precipitation pathways;

5               Evaluate the growth and yield of maize in the D. crassiflora-based agroforestry ecosystem using organic and inorganic fertilizers.

1.4       JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY

As forest area in Nigeria is reduced annually and soil nutrients status declining, there is need to determine an environmentally friendly land-use system for agriculture, forestry and agroforestry. Crop rotation, cover crops and natural based equipment are usually used to enhance the soil fertility (Adegoke et al., 2009). In the northern guinea savanna zone, preliminary investigation to assess the effects of scattered farm trees on the yield of agricultural crops showed that food crops like yam (Dioscorea rotundata) planted under light shade of trees such as Mangifera indica (mango) or  Accacia auriculiformis had 30% higher yield than those planted in the open space (Adegbehim et al., 1990 ). This feature was due to tree litterfall and nutrient cycling in the soil which enhanced the fertility of the soil. Salami and Oluwole (2003) confirmed that the traditional agroforestry can be better maintained in the tropical countries, such as Nigeria and Cameroon, with different types of agroforestry systems to enhance soil fertility.

Farmers in Uroboland in the Niger Delta zone practise integrated farming syetem that uses palm trees and some food crops to maintain soil fertility (Aweto, 2000). Integrated farming system is a tool for sustaining organic matter and nutrient build up in the soil and for improving soil sustainability. The use of external inputs, such as fertilizers, is often reduced by recycling of organic matter within the system (Okeke, 2010). Shifting cultivation, bush fallow and alley cropping systems use deep rooted trees and shrubs to recycle plant nutrients, thereby building up organic matter (Nair, 1983; 1987).

Finally, Scherr (1991) emphasized the need for studies to document basic potentials of trees and shrubs used in agroforestry. This study emphasizes adoption of agroforestry development, especially with the use of Diospyros crassiflora and other arable food crops. The study also aims at determing the nutrient inputs of D. crassiflora to the soil in order to encourage farmers to embark on the establishment of D.crassiflora tree plantations, using economically viable agroforestry land- use management systems. The results of this study will also encourage greater production of D. crassiflora plantations and consequently, boast the health status of the farmers via the medicinal values and industrial timber uses of the species.

1.5       SCOPE OF THE STUDY

The study involved leaf litter production and nutrient cycling in 1.5 hectare of four/five years old Diospyros crassiflora plantation at the Humid Forest Research Station, Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria (FRIN) in Okwuta Ibeku, Umuahia, Abia State in 2016 and in 2017. The growth and performance of maize in the same agroforestry farm was also determined or studied.

However, some limitations encountered during the study are stated below:

a.              Time factor: More time is needed to gain a better understanding on the variability and long-term trends in annual leaf litterfall and leaf litter quality. A longer period is required to further investigate the processes associated with the recycling of nutrients from leaf litter decomposition through plantation uptake

b.              Lack of funds: This was another major constraint, especially in the chemical analyses of soil and various leaf litter components. The study was personally but not externally funded.

c.              Lacks of adequate equipment: Lack of adequate equipment like oven, weighing and sensitive balances was difficult to come by. Permissions were obtainedfor used of the equipment from Humid Forest Research Station, Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria (FRIN) in Okwuta Ibeku, Umuahia, and Soil Laboratory Unit of the National Root Crops Research Institute, Umudike, all in Abia State, Nigeria.


Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.

Review


To Comment


Sold By

ProjectShelve

7836

Total Item

Reviews (20)

  • Anonymous

    1 day ago

    I got the material without delay. The content too is okay

  • Anonymous

    1 week ago

    Thank you guys for the document, this will really go a long way for me. Kudos to project shelve👍

  • Anonymous

    1 week ago

    You guys have a great works here I m really glad to be one of your beneficiary hope for the best from you guys am pleased with the works and content writings it really good

  • Anonymous

    1 week ago

    Excellent user experience and project was delivered very quickly

  • Anonymous

    2 weeks ago

    The material is very good and worth the price being sold I really liked it 👍

  • Anonymous

    2 weeks ago

    Wow response was fast .. 👍 Thankyou

  • Anonymous

    3 weeks ago

    Trusted, faster and easy research platform.

  • TJ

    3 weeks ago

    great

  • Anonymous

    3 weeks ago

    My experience with projectselves. Com was a great one, i appreciate your prompt response and feedback. More grace

  • Anonymous

    3 weeks ago

    Sure plug ♥️♥️

  • Anonymous

    3 weeks ago

    Thanks I have received the documents Exactly what I ordered Fast and reliable

  • Anonymous

    3 weeks ago

    Wow this is amazing website with fast response and best projects topic I haven't seen before

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Genuine site. I got all materials for my project swiftly immediately after my payment.

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    It agree, a useful piece

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Good work and satisfactory

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Good job

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Fast response and reliable

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Projects would've alot easier if everyone have an idea of excellence work going on here.

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Very good 👍👍

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Honestly, the material is top notch and precise. I love the work and I'll recommend project shelve anyday anytime