ISOLATION OF MICROORGANISMS ASSOCIATED WITH DETERIORATION OF SWEET POTATO (IPOMOEA BATATAS (L.) LAM) DURING STORAGE

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00008894

No of Pages: 47

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦3000

  • $

ABSTRACT

 

Microorganisms associated with the sweet potatoes during storage were analyzed by isolation, characterization and identification. The bacteria belong to Erwinia spp isolated pathogenic fungi includes: Aspergillus Niger, Fusarium oxysporumAspergillus flavus, Rhizopus Stolonizer and Botryobiplodia spp respectively. Rhozopius sp has the highest percentage occurance of (27.3%) followed by Aspergilus niger (24.4%) and Aspergilus flavus (12.12%) has the least frequency percentage. Pathogenity test revealed that Rhizopus spp and Botryobiplodia sp is the most virulent and Aspergilus flavus is the least virulent fungus. The only isolated bacteria pathogen Erwinia sp (3.0mm) had rod shape and was gram negative. Spoilage of sweet potatoes during the storage is a major problem for both farmer and consumer. The study concluded that the one strains of spoilage bacteria and one strain of fungal should be taken into serious consideration during any proposed preservation methods of storage of sweet potatoes.



TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title page                                                                                                                                i

Certification                                                                                                                           ii

Dedication                                                                                                                              iii

Acknowledgements                                                                                                                iv

Table of contents                                                                                                                    v

List of tables                                                                                                                           vii

List of figures                                                                                                                         viii

Abstract                                                                                                                                  iv

 

CHAPTER 1

1.0       INTRODUCTION                                                                                                      1

1.1       Aims and Objectives                                                                                                  4

 

CHAPTER 2

2.0       LITERATURE REVIEW                                                                                           5

2.1       The Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas)                                                                         5

2.1.1    The Origin                                                                                                                  6

2.1.2    Cultivation                                                                                                                  7

2.1.3    Nutrient Content                                                                                                         8

2.2       Microbial Spoilage of Potatoes                                                                                  10

2.2.1    Rhizopus Sp.                                                                                                               10

2.2.2    Sclerotinia screrotiorum                                                                                             11 

2.2.3    Botrytis Cinerea                                                                                                          12

2.2.4    Fusarium oxysporum                                                                                                  13

2.2.5    Alternaria solani                                                                                                         14

2.2.6    Ralstonia solanacearum                                                                                             15

2.3       Disease and Pests                                                                                                        16

2.3.1    Fungal Diseases                                                                                                          16

2.3.2    Nematodes                                                                                                                  18

2.3.3    Insects                                                                                                                         19

2.4       Harvesting, Curing and Storage                                                                                 21

 

CHAPTER 3

3.0       MATERIALS AND METHODS                                                                               22

3.1       Materials                                                                                                                     22

3.2       Source of sweet potatoes                                                                                            22

3.3        Media Preparation                                                                                                     22

3.3.1    Incubation of Culture Media                                                                                      22

3.3.2    Subcutting/Purification of Fungal Isolates                                                                 23

3.3.3    Incubation of Culture Media                                                                                      23

3.3.4    Characterization and Identification of Bacterial Isolates                                           23

3.4       Gram Staining Methods                                                                                              23

3.5       Biochemical Test                                                                                                        24

3.5.1    Motility Test                                                                                                               24

3.5.2    Catalase Test                                                                                           24

3.5.3    Coagulase Test (Slide test)                                                                                                          24
3.5.4    Oxidase Test                                                                                                          25
3.5.5    Citrate Utilization Test                                                                                           25
3.5.6    Indole Test                                                                                                                     26
3.5.7    Voges-Proskauer Test                                                                                           26
3.5.8    Methyl Red Test                                                                                                          27
3.5.9    Characterization and identification of fungi isolates using lactophenol                      27
            cotton blue staining

3.5.10  Pathogenicity Test (Test for spoilage potential of the bacterial isolates)                       28

3.6       Confirmation of Isolates used in Pathogenecity Test                                                 28

 

CHAPTER 4

4.0       RESULTS                                                                                                                   29

 
CHAPTER 5
5.0       DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION                                                                        34

5.1       Discussion                                                                                                                   34

5.2       Conclusion                                                                                                                  35

Reference                                                                                                                    37








LIST OF TABLES

 

 

Tables             Title                                                   Page

           

1:                     Nutritional Composition of Sweet Potato                              9

 

2:                     Fungi isolated from sweet potatoes samples                      29

 

3                      Identification and characterize of Bacterial Isolates              30

 

4:                     Identification and characterize of Macroscopic and               31

microscopic of the Fungal Isolates in sweet potatoes

 

5:                     Percentages occurrence of fungi isolated from the                32

infected sweet potatoes

 

6:        Pathogenicity test on sweet potato for bacteria                                 33


 

 

 

CHAPTER 1

1.0    INTRODUCTION

Important root and of much nourishment to South East region of Nigeria includes cassava, yam, sweet potatoes and Irish potatoes. These tubers suffer from post harvest losses resulting from physical, physiological and pathological factors or the combination of all the three. The late blight diseases of potatoes, in Ireland in 1845 caused by phythophtora infestans, was responsible for the famous Irish famine of 1845-1846, resulted in the death and immigration of millions of people from the country to other countries such as United State of America (Onuegbu, 2002).

The sweet potato (Ipomoea batata (L) Lam) is a dicotyledomous plant that belongs to the family of convolvulaceae. It is large, starchy, sweet tasting tuberous root. The young leaves and shoots are sometimes eaten in greens. There are approximately 50 general and more than 100 species. Recognized two species in the section batatas, which includes the sweet potatoes and subsequently there species  have been added and one removed. The closet with relative of the sweet potato appears to be Ipomoea trifida and Ipomoea tabascan. Sweet potatos a creeping plants and the only economical species of the family convolvulcae (Onuegbu, 2002).

Despite its nutritional importance, the tubers have short storage life, generally, less than four weeks in the tropics. Their skin is easily damaged during harvest and post harvest handling leaving the crops highly perishable in microbial spoilage (FAO, 2008). Potato is an important source of dietary fiber and in Great Britain, it contribute, 15% of the intake of food. The starch tuberous roots are the major source of food for millions of persons; the leaves are also useful sources of vegetable in some countries. The plant originated in tropical American and they spend throughout the world.

Sweet potato is ranked seventh in the world’s production after wheat, maize, Irish potatoes, rice barely and cassava (FAO, 2008). Sweet potatoes are of particular importance as food crops throughout subtropics and tropical regions. The crop is one of important carbohydrate sources for millions of people, particularly those in developing nations. Sweet potatoes have nutritional value than Irish potatoes; especially in vitamins A, B and C in calcium. China and Japan are the major consumers of sweet potatoes (Ameinyo and Ataga, 2006). Post-harvest losses of all perishable tropical produce have been conservatively estimated at 25% of production. Attack by fungi, bacteria and viruses are probably the most serious causes of post harvest losses of between 25% and 60% of the initial weight depending on variety when stored for six and a half month in a semi sub-terranean. Ameinyo and Ataga (2006) reported Rhizopus oryzae and Aspergillus niger as being responsible for sweet potato rot. Reported fusarium oxysporium, fusarium trichothecoides and fusarium radicicola to cause potato tuber rot under different condition of temperature and humidity. The three sp were susceptible to rot with higher relative humidity and higher temperature. The use of dry as well as cool storage is therefore important in reducing the loss from fusarium rots of potatoes.

However, the most common post-harvest storage disease of potatoes as reported by Ameinyo and Ataga (2006) include Rhizopus soft (fusarium oxysporium) and black rot (Ceratocystis fimbriata). Different diseases arises after potatoes are harvested, this is because the storage organs are essentially dormant structure and their cells are physiologically unlike those of the growing plants. The numerous diseases which occur in transit and storage result mainly from the activity of fungi and bacteria. Investigations carried out by various workers cleanly indicate that the real cause of the spoilage of tubers in transits or storage result mainly from the activity of fungi and bacteria.

Investigation carried out by various workers clearly indicate that the real cause of the spoilage of tubers in transit or storage is the high temperature and injuries sustained by the tubers during the process of marketing (Ameinyo and Ataga, 2006). Such disease considerable reduces the commercial value of produce. Harvested tubers are vulnerable to attack by mucus because of their moisture content and rich nutrient. Due to harvest, packing and transportation, injuries of various binds are caused which facilitate the entry of certain pathogens. Some of the pathogens produce extra cellular enzymes and start degeneration process in advance of the fungal hypae or bacterial cells of the attacking pathogens. As a result of infection, the market and nutritive value of the tubers are reduced, either due to its ugly appearance or the changes in the stored products of the tubers (Oyewale, 2006).

Recently, only while (i.e. uncut) sweet potato tubers without apparent wounds were retailed maybe as a result of the difficult economic situation in developing nations. Sweet potatoes are now halved (depending on the size of the tuber and packed in polyethylene bags for retailer. However, the potential for storage rot associated with these practices has been given little attention and tubers showing various amounts of damage are now commonly retailed in the open market. Bruised or cut tubers readily become colonized by propagules of pathogens associated with the surface and those from adjacent infected tubers. A wide variety of mucus particularly moulds have been implicated in tuber spoilage. Relatively few are implicated as primary pathogens.

1.1       AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

i.          To isolate, identify and characterize bacteria associated with deterioration of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas)

ii.         To isolate, identify and characterize fungi associated with deterioration of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas)

 iii.       To determine the percentage occurrence of bacteria and fungi associated with deterioration of sweet potato spoilage (Ipomoea batatas)


Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment