FERMENTATIVE IMPROVEMENT OF NUTRITIONAL STATUS OF “OGI” USING SOYBEANS

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00008636

No of Pages: 75

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦3000

  • $

ABSTRACT


Ogi, Akamu or Pap which is a common food for weaning babies is usually low in protein (8-15%), mostly when produced from Maize alone. This research was carried out to determine the possibility of improving the nutritional value (protein content) of pap using SoyBean. The maize was steeped along with different percentages of parboiled Soy Bean (5-50%), and allowed to ferment together. The protein determination using Kjeldalh method (Proximate Analysis) showed that the raw Ogi sample from White Maize without Soybean (Control) has the lowest protein content (13.65%) while the Ready–to-eat (Cooked) Ogi from Yellow Maize with 50% BoiledSoyBean has the highest protein content (53.31%). However, more than 75% of the people who were asked for sensory evaluation of Ogi from YellowMaize+50% Parboiled Soybean pap liked it. Hence, processing maize along with up to 50% soybean will tremendously improve nutritional value of pap given to babies as well as adults, as the pap will not need the addition of milk (which is more expensive than soybean) after preparation. Microbiologically, this study characterized the Microorganism found in 0–72h Maize + Soy Bean fermentation medium during Ogi production (a cereal based porridge). The samples were fermented using sterile water for 0–72 hours. About 1ml of the fermentation water was aseptically collected. Standard microbiological characterization of the isolates was carried out. Results revealed that Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Corynebacteria and Lactobacillus species were the main microbes found in the fermentation medium within 72 hours of fermentation. Other microbes found in the medium included Staphylococcus aureusEscherichia coli, Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Micrococcus species (bacteria), Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger, Penicillium, Rhizopus, Mucor,  and Fusarium (Fungi). However, it was also found that 75% of the isolates were susceptible to the Antibiotics tested against them using the foreign sensitivity disc, while the remaining 25% were resistant to most of the Antibiotics.







TABLE OF CONTENTS


Title page ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------            i

Certification ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------            ii

Dedication ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------           iii

Acknowledgements -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------         iv

Table of contents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------           v

Lists of tables ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------            viii

Lists of figures -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------         ix

Abstract ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------           x


CHAPTER ONE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------    1

1.0       INTRODUCTION---------------------------------------------------------------------------           1

1.1       AIMS AND OBJECTIVES----------------------------------------------------------------            3


CHAPTER TWO--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2.0       LITERATURE REVIEW--------------------------------------------------------------------         4

2.1       MAIZE-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------           4

2.2       MAIZE KERNEL ANATOMY------------------------------------------------------------           5

2.3       USES OF MAIZE----------------------------------------------------------------------------           8

2.4       FOOD FERMENTATION IN NIGERIA------------------------------------------------            9

2.5       BENEFITS OF FERMENTATION IN AFRICA----------------------------------------           10

2.6       LACTIC ACID BACTERIA (LAB) -----------------------------------------------------            10

2.7       IMPORTANCE OF LACTIC ACID FERMENTATION IN AFRICA--------------   11

2.8       SOY BEANS---------------------------------------------------------------------------------            12

2.8.1    HISTORY OF SOY BEANS---------------------------------------------------------------           12

2.8.2    FORTIFICATION OF SOYBEAN WITH MAIZE--------------------------------------         13

2.9       IMPORTANCE OF SOYBEAN------------------------------------------------------------         13

2.10     USES OF SOYBEAN------------------------------------------------------------------------         13

2.11     RELEVANCE OF SOYBEAN TO PAP (OGI) FOR MAIZE------------------------            14

2.12     OGI--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------            14

2.12.1  PREPARATION OF OGI------------------------------------------------------------------            15

2.12.2  NUTRITIONAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF OGI-------------------------           17

2.12.2  1NUTRITIONAL PROPERTIES OF OGI-----------------------------------------------           18

2.12.2.2PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF OGI-----------------------------------------------------            19

2.12.3  CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF OGI------------------------------------------------------           19

2.12.4  HEALTH BENEFITS OF OGI------------------------------------------------------------            20

2.12.5  HEALTH HAZARDS OF OGI-------------------------------------------------------------           20


CHAPTER THREE---------------------------------------------------------------------------------           21

3.0       MATERIALS AND METHOD-------------------------------------------------------------         21

3.1       FIELD SAMPLING-------------------------------------------------------------------------            21

3.2       STERILITY OF MATERIALS-------------------------------------------------------------           21

3.3       SAMPLE PREPARATION-----------------------------------------------------------------           21

3.4       MICROBIAL KINETIES OF THE FERMENTATION--------------------------------           21

3.5       DETERMINATION OF FERMENTATION PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PARAMETERS------------------------------------------------------------------------------           22

3.5.1    pH----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------           22

3.5.2    TEMPERATURE: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 22

3.6       CULTURE MEDIA/ PREPARATION-------------------------------------------------   22

3.6.1    NUTRIENT AGAR------------------------------------------------------------------------ 22

3.6.2    MACCONKEY AGAR----------------------------------------------------------------------           23

3.6.3    SARBOURAND DEXTROSE AGAR (SDA) ------------------------------------------            23

3.6.4    DEMAN, ROGOSA AND SHARPE AGAR (MRSA) ------------------------------- 23

3.7       CULTURING METHOD------------------------------------------------------------------            24

3.7.1    SERIAL DILUTION----------------------------------------------------------------------   24

3.7.2    INOCULATION--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24

3.8       TOTAL VIABLE COUNT (TVC) --------------------------------------------------------           25

3.9       ISOLATION OF PURE CULTURE -----------------------------------------------------            25

3.10     STORING OF PURE CULTURE----------------------------------------------------------           26

3.11     GRAM REACTION------------------------------------------------------------------------            26

3.12     BIOCHEMICAL TESTS-------------------------------------------------------------------            27

3.12.1  CATALASE TEST--------------------------------------------------------------------------            27

3.12.2  CITRATE TEST-----------------------------------------------------------------------------            28

3.13.3  OXIDASE TEST-----------------------------------------------------------------------------           28

3.12.4 INDOLE TEST------------------------------------------------------------------------------            29

3.12.5  COAGULATE TEST-----------------------------------------------------------------------            29

3.12.6 METHYL RED TEST---------------------------------------------------------------------- 30

3.13     CARBOHYDRATE FERMENTATION TEST---------------------------------------- 30

3.13.1  USES OF CARBOHYDRATE FERMENTATION TEST-----------------------------           31

3.14     PREPARATION OF OGI----------------------------------------------------------------- 32

3.14.1  FILTERING THE SAMPLE---------------------------------------------------------------            32

3.14.2  SEPARATION OF SAMPLE STARCH-------------------------------------------------            32

3.14.3  PREPARATION OF READY-TO-EAT OGI------------------------------------------ 32

3.15     DETERMINATION OF THE BEST SAMPLE OF OGI----------------------------   32

3.16     PROXIMATE ANALYSIS OF RAW AND READY – TO – EAT OGI-------------            33

3.16.1  MOISTURE CONTENT DETERMINATION------------------------------------------            34

3.16.2  ASH CONTENT DETERMINATION----------------------------------------------------           34

3.16.4  FAT CONTENT DETERMINATION---------------------------------------------------            34

3.16.5 CARBOHYDRATE DETERMINATION-----------------------------------------------            35

3.16.6  PROTEIN CONTENT DETERMINATION----------------------------------------------         36

3.16.6  DETERMINATION OF TOTAL TITRATABLE ACIDITY--------------------------           37

3.16.7  DETERMINATION OF PH-----------------------------------------------------------------         37

3.17     STATISTICAL ANALYSIS---------------------------------------------------------------            37


CHAPTER FOUR------------------------------------------------------------------------------------         38

4.0       RESULTS-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------           38


CHAPTER FIVE--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

5.0       DISCUSSION, SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION-----   53

5.1       DISCUSSION--------------------------------------------------------------------------------           53

5.2       SUMMWRY AND CONCLUSION-------------------------------------------------------           54

5.3       CONTRIBUTION OF KNOWLEDGE----------------------------------------------------         54

5.4       RECCOMMENDATION-------------------------------------------------------------------           55

REFERENCES--------------------------------------------------------------------------------         56

APPPENDIX----------------------------------------------------------------------------------         62

 

 




LIST OF TABLES


Table 4.1:        Work samples and their various proportions. -------------------------------    41

Table 4.2:        The ph readings. -----------------------------------------------------------------   42

Table 4.3:        The temperature readings. ------------------------------------------------------- 43

Table 4.4:        Total titratable acidity (TTA).  -------------------------------------------------- 44

Table 4.5:        Proximate analysis. -----------------------------------------------------------------           45

Table 4.6:        Microbial isolates from different Agar per hours..  ---------------------------            46

Table 4.7:        Morphological and Biochemical characteristics of some isolates on MacConkey Agar. ---------------------------------------------------------------   47

Table 4.8:        Morphological and microscopic characteristic of some Lactic Acid Bacteria on deMan Rogosa and Sharpe agar(MRSA).  ------------------------           68

Table 4.9:        Occurrence of Microorganisms during the steeping of Maize + soy beans.     --49

Table 4.10:      Sensitivity tests of some the isolates. ---------------------------------------------         50

                            

 

 

 

 

LISTS OF FIGURES

Figure 1:         0hr fermentation of samples. -----------------------------------------------------------

 Figure 2:        72hr fermentation of samples-----------------------------------------------------------

Figure 3:         Recommended samples after blending-------------------------------------------------

Figure 4:         Sensitivity test for E. coli -----------------------------------------------------------------

Graph 4.1:       Graph of ph against fermentation time (h) -----------------------------------------------

Graph 4.2:       Graph of Temperature against fermentation time (h) ----------------------------------

Graph 4.3        Graph of TTA against fermentation time (h) ---------------------------------------------

Figure 5:         Sensitivity test for Proteus sp. ------------------------------------------------------------

 Figure 6:        Sensitivity test for Staphylococcus aureus----------------------------------------------

 

 

 




CHAPTER ONE

1.0       INTRODUCTION

            Ogi (Pap or Akamu) is a fermented semi-solid product manufactured from cereals commonly maize, sorghum, and or millet. It is a staple food in most African countries, with varying preparation methods and names. Ogi is commonly used as weaning food for babies and also for young children and as a standard breakfast cereals in many homes, but some adult also enjoy this delicacy (Nago et al., 2011). Ogi is a porridge prepared from fermented maize, sorghum and or millet in West Africa. The traditional preparation of Ogi involves soaking of corn in clean water for about 1-3 days followed by wet-milling using a blender then sieving to remove bran, hulls and germ. The pormance is retained on the sieve and later discarded as an animal feed while the filtrate is fermented for about 2-3 days again to yield Ogi which is a sour white starchy sediment (Akinele et al., 2010).During processing, nutrient including protein and minerals are lost from the grains thereby affecting nutritional quality adversely. The high moisture content of Ogi predisposes it to spoilage.

            However, Ogi as it is mostly called is the most popular traditional health-sustaining fermented food in Western Nigeria. It is formulated from cereal: White maize (Zea mays), yellow maize (Z. mays, yellow variety), red guinea corn (Sorghum vulgare), white guinea corn (Sorghum bicolor) and millet (Pennisetum typhoideum) but not from rice and wheat. In some communities in southwestern Nigeria, uncooked ogi is normally administered to people having running stomach to reduce the frequency of stooling, but the empirical proofs for this claim is lacking. Studies have revealed that Lactobacillus rhamnosus and L. reuteri could colonize the vagina, kill viruses, and reduce the risk of infections, including bacterial vaginosis (Reid et al., 2011a; Cadieux et al., 2012).

The nutritional benefits of ogi have been investigated extensively but the therapeutic and preventive effects of ogi and LAB, which are responsible for the fermentation and organoleptic quality of ogi have been scantily reported. LAB has been implicated in the fermentation of ogi and has been frequently isolated. Lactobacillus spp., Pediococcus spp., Leuconostoc spp. and Weissella spp. have been reported variously.

However, the reduction in moisture content through drying can enhance the shelf life, provide convenience and allow for easy reconstitution of the Ogi powder. Although drying may extend the shelf-life of food, it may also impact some undesirable changes in the quality of food (Omemu et al., 2017).Several traditional fermentation have been upgraded to high technology production systems and this has undoubtedly improved the general well-being of the people as well as the economy (Achi, et al., 2015).

            Fermentation of pap most of the times is spontaneous but could also be induced. The combination of different types of cereals in the production of pap increase the protein quality and relative nutritive values which would have been lost during steeping, milling and sieving processes compared to use of single cereal. Several strategies have been used to increase the protein content and minimize nutrient loss (Inyang and Idoko, 2016). Currently in Africa, efforts are being made to modify the processing of pap with a view to enhancing its nutritive value and shelf-life.  One of such methods of achieving this is by blending with legumes that is high in proteins such as soybeans seed.  However, Ogi has two possible uses; as food and as medicine for running stomach. As food, Ogi can be used for the production of backed pap which is called by Yorubas, Agidi by Igbos and calabars. It can also be used as food by mixing with boiled water to attain a jelly-like thick state, ready for drinking. Also, as medicine, raw part of the Ogi, when mixed with clean and well sterilized water has the ability to stop running stomach when taken in good quality (Ohenhen and Ikene-Bommeh, 2017).


1.1       AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

1.     To assess the microorganisms associated with maize (Zea maize) fermentation.

2.     To determine the maize-soybean ratio suitable for human consumption.

3.     To produce and compare the nutritional quality of Ogi produce from maize alone and Ogi prepared by mixing maize and soybean seed.

4.     To determine the effect of fermentation on cereals

5.     To conduct sensitivity test on the microbial isolates.

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment