ABSTRACT
The effects of toothpaste on oral bacterial load were tested using different brands of tooth paste, Colgate, Oral B pro-health, Red Close Up, Close Up Herbal, Darbur Herbal, Sensodyne, Aquafresh, Macleans, Holdent and Pepsodent. The Total Oral Bacterial Count of toothpaste (Pepsodent) has the highest oral bacterial count immediately after brushing of the teeth at the serial dilution factor of 10-6 giving 9.8x10-8cfu/ml, while the bacterial count of (Holdent) has the lowest oral bacterial count of 1.0x10-7cfu/ml immediately after brushing of teeth at the serial dilution of 10-4, because the viable count of bacterial load reduces with the time exposure. The finding should be taken into account of further research concerning the prolong use of toothpaste containing fluoride, and some toothpastes that increase bacterial load of the oral cavity.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
page i
Certification
ii
Dedication iii
Acknowledgment
iv
Table
of contents v
List
of tables vii
Abstract
viii
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Aims and objectives 4
1.2 Literature review 4
1.2.1 Definition of toothpaste 4
1.2.2 History of toothpaste 5
1.2.3 Ingredients of toothpaste 7
1.2.4 Types of toothpaste 9
1.3 Oral micro-flora that effects bacterial
load of toothpaste 10
1.4 Composition of tooth paste 11
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 Materials and method 16
2.1 Toothpastes and sources 16
2.2 Collection of sample 16
2.3 Sterility of materials 16
2.4 Preparation of culture media 16
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 Results 18
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 Discussion 32
4.1 Conclusion 33
REFERENCES
LIST
OF TABLES
Table
|
Title
|
Page
|
1
|
Biochemical characterization of
oral bacteria isolates
|
21
|
2
|
Bacterial count of Red Close Up on
nutrient agar
|
22
|
3
|
Bacterial count of Maclean on
nutrient agar
|
23
|
4
|
Bacterial count of Darbur Herbal on
nutrient agar
|
24
|
5
|
Bacterial count of Oral B pro
health on nutrient agar
|
25
|
6
|
Bacterial count of Holdent on
nutrient agar
|
26
|
7
|
Bacterial count of Close Herbal on
nutrient agar
|
27
|
8
|
Bacterial count of Aquafresh on
nutrient agar
|
28
|
9
|
Bacterial count Sensodyne on
nutrient agar
|
29
|
10
|
Bacterial count of Colgate on
nutrient agar
|
30
|
11
|
Bacterial count of Pepsodent on
nutrient agar
|
31
|
CHAPTER ONE
1.0
INTRODUCTION
Bacteria form an important group of
microorganisms found in both healthy and diseased mouth (ADA, 2010).There are
300 types of bacteria found in the mouth. One might think or suggest that the
oral carvity is an easy environment for bacteria to colonize (Williams and
Cummins, 2003). However, relatively few of the oral bacteria are found further
along the gastro-intestinal tract. This illustrates the unique ecology of the
oral carvities(Becks and WainWaright, 1993). Moreover, a bacterial accumulation
on oral surfaces is a major factor in the development of most of the common dental
diseases. Streptococcus mutans a
bacterium in the mouth is the chief bacterium that causes plaque and may cause
dental caries. Plaque is a complex biofilm found on the development of dental
caries. The accumulation and development of plaques depends upon the outcome of
the interactions between the adhesiveness of plaque to the tooth surfaces and
physical shear forces which serve to dislodge and remove the plaque. Toothpastes
and brushes are among the physical forces that removes plaque. Flouride
containing toothpaste has significant effects on the initiation and progression
of caries. Within these flourides containing toothpastes is a cationic agent
called Chlorhexidine. Chlorhexidine has been documented for its ability to
inhibit the formation of dental plaque. However, the use of chlorhexidine has a
few draw backs. The first draws back is the staining of the teeth and on tongue.
Another drawback is unpeasant taste (Brailsford etal., 2005).
When eating or drinking something
after the use of chlorhexidine, one can experience a change in taste
perception.
Triclosan, a compound commonly used
for disinfection is another broad spectrum antibacterial agent manufactured
specially for use in oral care (Williams and Cummins, 2003). It has been shown
in vitro to be active against many of the organisms associated with plaque,
gingivitis and bad breath.
Triclosan works by disrupting the
bacterial cytoplasm membrane resulting in the leakage of cellular content and
the death of the bacteria (Bobby and Vankesten, 1998).
It is used in most oral care
ingredients and has a long history of use in consumer products. Fluoride in
drinking water and toothpaste do not appear to have demonstrated effects on the
compositor on dental plaque, fluid pH change and reduces lactate production
following consumption of sugar (Black and Bora, 2000).
The exact mechanism underlying this inhibition
is not known but fluoride has been shown to inhibit a variety of bacterial processes
that are mediated (Brailsford et al.,
2005). On occasion, many people experience stale or unpleasant breath upon
waking in the morning. However, some people, about 25% of the population,
experience halitosis or bad breath on a regular basis. The problem results from
the anaerobic breakdown of protein from food and salivary debris by gram (-)
negative bacteria, which generates amino acids such as cysteine and methionine. Many different products are
currently marketed that promised to provide consumers with fresh breath. It is
estimated that more than one billion dollars are spent. Annually world-wide on
lozenges, chewing gum, mouth rinse, toothpaste and dentrifices in an effort to
resolve this condition (Black and Bora, 2000). The active agents that are
incorporated into treatment forms includes surfactants, antibacterials agent,
baking soda, perioxide; metal sacks herbal and natural extracts and chlorine
dioxide. Contaminated toothbrushes which are regularly become contaminated with
microorganisms that colonize the teeth and oral carvity. Under he usual
conditions of storage, a toothbrush can therefore serve as a vector for the reintroduction
potential pathogens into the oral carvity and also for the introduction of other microbial species originating from the
bathroom environment. It has reported that toothbrushes could be a source of repeated
oral infection (Bowen, 1997).Significant bacteria on toothbrushes have been
reported after tooth brushing, especially in patients with severe
periodontitis. This can be caused by simply leaving ones toothbrushes kept in a
moist environment, like that of a bathroom, retain up to 50% of herpes simplex
virus types 1 after one week. An in-vitro study involving, patients who had
oral inflammatory disease found that 34% required no additional therapy after
they changed their toothbrush contamination (Bowen, 1997).
Some studies suggest that the general
population replace toothbrushes every month or after any illness(Caldwell and
Stallard, 1999).
The use of disposable toothbrushes is
also a good option to reduce oral bacteria flora. Another idea to prevent the
contamination of brushes is to coat the brush and the chlorhexine after each
use. One study found that soaking tooth brushes for 20mins in a mouth rinse contain
essential oils killed 100% of bacteria (Warren et al., 2000).Bacteria in the mouth are an issue everyone has to
deal with some of the bacteria are harmful and cause plaque and bad breath.
There are tooth paste and other remedies that help to kill an d prevent
bacteria in peoples mouth. Calcium carbonated and silicic acid ensure through
removal of plaque, which is mainly responsible for caries, paradentosis and
tartar. With sea salt and minerals, in addition to extracts of amine, myrrh and
yarrow toothpastes ensures a healthy bacteria flora in the mouth with food
water and air.; the presence of mucosa folds interdental species gums and other
places where food¸ designated epithelium and saliva are easily trapped creating
favorable conditions for the reproduction of most microorganisms. Dentalcaries
is localized and transmissible pathological I nfections process that results in
the destruction of hard enamel tissues (Brailorsky, 1995).
Streptococcus
mutans, an acidogenic and acid uric microorganisms
colonizing the oral carvity is considered to be main cause of dental caries.
Fluoride therapy has been the cornerstone of caries preventive strategies since
the infuoridation scheme over five decade ago. Toothpaste is by far the most
widespread form of fluoride usage (Black and Bora, 2000).
1.1
AIMS
AND OBJECTIVES
i.
To isolate bacterial
resident in human oral cavity
ii.
To determine the effect
(reduction in microbial load) of some commonly used toothpaste on the bacterial
flora of the human oral cavity.
1.2 LITERATURE REVIEW
1.2.1 Definition of toothpaste
Toothpaste is a paste or gel
dentrifice used with toothbrush as an accessory to clean and maintaining the aesthetics
and health of teeth. Tooth paste is used
to promote orsl hygiene. It serves as an abrasive that aids in removing the
dental plaque and food from the teeth and assists in suppressing Halitosis and
deliver active ingredients (most common fluoride to help prevent tooth and gum
disease (gingivitis) (Carlson et al.,
1998).
Most the cleaning is achieved by
mechanical action of the toothbrush and not by the toothpaste. Salt and sodium
bicarbonate (Baking soda) are among materials that can be substituted for commercial
toothpaste (Cheesebrough, 2000).
Toothpaste is untended to be
swallowed due to the fluoride content, but is generally not veyharmful if accidentally
swallowed in small amounts, however, one should seek medical attention after swallowing
abnormally large amount (Davis, 1995).
1.2.2 History
of toothpaste
Early
toothpaste
According to ( Davis,1995), he stated
that the Greeks and then the Romans improved the recipes for toothpaste by
adding abrasives such as crushed and oysters shells. In the 9th century,
the Arab musician and fashion designer Ziryab invented a types of toothpaste,
which he popularized thought Islamic Spain. The exact ingredients of this
toothpaste are known but it was reported to have both functional pleasant to
taste. It is not known whether those early toothpaste where used aloe or were
to be rubbed into the teeth with rags or were to be used with early toothbrushes such as neem- a tree twig and
miswak.
Toothpaste
powder
Toothpaste powder for use with
toothbrushes came into general use in the 19th century in Britain.
Most were homemade with chalk, pulverized brick or salts as ingredients (Gunsolley
et al., 2006).An 1866 home
encyclopedia recommended pulverized charcoal
and cautioned that many potent toothpowder that were commercially marketed did
more harm than good.
Modern
toothpaste
An 18th century American
and British toothpastes recipe called for burnt bread. Another formula fund
this time called for dragons blood (La resin), cinnamon and burnt (ADA, 2010).In 1900,a paste made of hydrogen
perioxide (N2O2) and baking soda as recommended for use
with toothbrushes.
Pre-mixed toothpaste were first
marketed in the 19th century,
but not surpass the popularity of tooth powder until world war 1. In
1892, Doctor Washington Sheffield of New London manufactured toothpaste into a
collapsible tube, Dr Sheffield Bremem dentifrice.
The original collapsible toothpaste tube
was made to lead.Fluoride was first added to toothpaste in the year 1890
‘tanagra’ containing calcium fluoride as the active ingredients , was sold by Karl
GF Toellner company of Bremen, Germany based upon the early work of chemist
Albert Deninger.Fluoride toothpaste developed in the 1950’s and receive the
American dental approval.
Procter and gamble started a research
program in the early 1940’s.procter and gamble developed a joint research project
team headed by Dr Joseph Muhler at Indiana university to study new toothpaste
with fluoride (Konen, 2000).
Proter and Gamble crest launched its
first clinically proven fluoride containing
toothpaste. On august 1, 1969, the American dental association reported that crest
has been shown to be an effective anticarvity (decay peventative) dentrifice that
can be of significant value when used in a conscientiously applied program of
oral hygiene and regular professional care.
Amount of fluoride in toothpaste
varies from country: toothpaste in UK and Greece typically contains more
fluoride than US toothpaste. In 2006, Bio-repairappeared in Europe with the
first toothpaste contain synthetic hydroxylapatite as an alternative to
fluoride for the demineralization and reparation of tooth enamel (MacCarty,
1995).
1.2.3 Ingredients
of Toothpaste
According to Onysi et al., (1990) in addition to 20-42% water,
toothpastes are derived from a variety of compounds, the three main ones are
abrasives, fluoride and detergents
Abrasives
Abrasives constitute at least 50% of
a typical tooth [paste. These insoluble particles help to remove plaque from
the teeth. The removal of plaque and calculus helps minimize cavities and
periodontal diseases . Abrasives includes aluminumhydroxide, (AL(COH)3),
hydrogen phosphates, various silica’s and zeolites and hydroxyapatite
(Ca5(PO4)3OH). Abrasives helps in the removal of stains from tooth surfaces,
but has not been shown to improve dental health over above the effects of the removal
of plaque and calculus,
Fluoride
Fluoride in various forms is the most
popular active ingredients in toothpaste to prevent cavities.Fluoride occurs in small amount in plants
and animals, some natural water sources (Perlich et al., 1995). The additionalfluoride in toothpaste has beneficial
effects on the formation of dental enamel and bones, sodium fluoride (Naf) is
the most common source of fluoride, but
stannout fluoride (SnF2), Olafur(an organic salt of fluoride), and
sodium monoflurophospahte (Na2PO3F) are also used. Most
toothpaste sold in united states has the
1000 to 1100 parts per million fluoride .
Surfactants
Many although not all, toothpaste contain
sodium lauryl sulfate found in many
other personal care products , as well as shampoo and is mainly a foaming
agent, which enables uniform
distribution of toothpaste, improving its cleansing power or ability.
Other
components include
Antibacterial
agents
Triclosan, an antibacterial agent is
a common toothpaste ingredient in the United Kingdom. Triclsoan or zinc
chloride prevents gingivitis and according to American dental association helps
reduce tartar and bad breath.
A 2006 review of clinical research
concluded that there was evidence for reducing plaque and gingivitis (Perlich et al, 1995).
Flavorants
Toothpaste comes in a varietyof odours
and flavour intended to encourage use of the product. Three most common
flavorants are peppermint spear mint and winter green.
Toothpaste flavoured in
peppermint-arise oil is popularly in the Mediterranean region. These flavours
are provided by the respective oils e.g pepper mints oil. More exorticflavours
include anethole arise, apricot, bubble gum, cinnamon, fennel, lavender, neem,
vanilla. Lemon, orange and pine, more unusual flavours have been used e.g peanut
butter, iced tea and even whisky. Unflavoured toothpaste exists.
1.2.4 Types
of toothpaste
Whitening
toothpaste
Many types of toothpaste make
whitening contains, some of these toothpaste removes the stains not the peroxide
(Quirynen et al., 2003).
Whitening toothpaste cannot alter the
natural colours of the teeth or reverse discolouration by penetrating surface stains
or decay. To remove surface stains, whitening toothpaste may include abrasives
to gentle polish the teeth to break down
or dissolve stains.
It reduces the strength of ones teeth
(the process scrapes away a protective outer layer of enamel).
Herbal
and natural toothpastes
According to (Roberts, 2005) many
consumers have started to switch over to natural tooth pastes to avid synthetic
and artificial flavours that are
commonly found in regular toothpastes, because of the increased demand of
natural products, most of the toothpaste
manufactures now produce herbal tooth paste.
This types of toothpaste does not contain
dye or artificial flavours. Many herbal toothpastes do not contains fluoride or
sodium lauryl sulphate. The ingredients found on natural toothpaste vary widely
but often include baking soda, aloe,
eucalyptus oil, myrrh, plant extracts (strawberryextract) and essential oils.
In addition of the commercially available products, it is possible to make
ones’ own toothpaste using similar ingredients.
1.3
ORAL
MICRO-FLORA THAT EFFECTS BACTERIAL LOAD OF TOOTHPASTE
The oral microflora is divided into
two groups and is as follows. They are permanent microflora of the oral cavity
whose presences is necessary for normal functioning of the dental system, as
well as the entire body.
Saprophytic
micro-flora: They affect the conditions of local
immune system , prevents the development of pathological conditions and support
bacterial equilibrium.
Pathogenic
microflora: They affect the organs of the tissue of
the mouth. The microflora ideally should not or perhaps be present in the very limited
quantities that do not substantially affects the oral carvities of the body.
The species composition of permanent oral; microflora is normally quite stable
and includes representatives of various micro-organism (bacteria). Predominant
are anaerobic bacteria (Lactobacilli),
bacteriods, fuzi forms, prevotelly, vellonella, spirochets and actinomycetes. Personal
hygiene is at a low level or is missing altogether, the qualitative composition
of bacterial flora changes. pathogenic micro-flora prevails its own quantity
increases by the tens or hundred of times within a very short time (Warren et al., 2000).
1.4
COMPOSITION
OF TOOTH PASTE
Humectants
and binders
Humectants
are used in dentifrices to prevent loss of water and subsequent hardening of
the paste when it is exposed to air. The most commonly used humectants are
glycerol and sorbitol. Binders are hydrophilic colloids which disperse or swell
in the presence of water and are used to stabilise toothpaste formulations by
preventing the separation of the solid and liquid phases (Orward, 1991). Examples
of binding agents used in toothpaste include the natural gums (arabic, karaya
and tragacanth), the seaweed colloids (alginates, Irish moss extract and gum
carrageenan) and synthetic celluloses (carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl
cellulose), with the latter now being used increasingly for economic reasons.
These substances are used routinely in the food and pharmaceutical industries
and should pose a minimal health risk when used in toothpaste. However,
sorbitol may cause diarrhoea in large doses as it acts as an osmotic laxative.
The FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives recommends that the intake of
sorbitol be limited to 150 mg/kg/day. Therefore, the use of 60-70% sorbitol gel
toothpastes by small children should be supervised by parents (Sullivan, 1990).
Detergents, flavours,
preservatives and colourings
Detergents
lower the surface tension and therefore help loosen plaque deposits and
emulsify or suspend the debris removed from the tooth surface during cleaning.
Detergents also contribute to the foaming property of dentifrices, an effect
which appeals to consumers. The commonly used detergent in toothpaste is sodium
lauryl sulphate. Flavours constitute only a minor part of a dentifrice, but are
important components for consumer acceptance. The flavour of a toothpaste is
usually a blend of several components. The principal flavours used are
peppermint, spearmint and wintergreen modified with other essential oils of
anise, clove, caraway, pimento, eucalyptus, citrus, menthol, nutmeg, thyme or cinnamon.
The humectants and some of the binders in toothpastes can act as nutrients for
various micro-organisms. Microbial contamination of dentifrices is restricted
by a low water activity and by the inclusion of preservatives such as
benzoates. Colouring agents are also added to dentifrices. These include
titanium dioxide for white pastes and various food dyes for coloured pastes and
gels (Chess et al., 1950).
Contact
sensitivity or mucosal irritation by dentifrices is relatively rare.
Occasionally, the flavours, colourings or preservatives can cause allergic
reactions in some individuals.4 These may include desquamation and oedema of
the lips and tongue, perioral dermatitis, angular cheilitis, gingivitis and
intra-oral ulceration. Some toothpastes can cause mild irritation of the oral
mucosa which disappears after use and is usually attributable to the detergent
or essential oil flavours. This again is quite rare as the majority of people
prefer the more flavoured dentifrices as the tingling sensation makes the mouth
feel fresh and clean, albeit for only a few minutes (Machackova and Smid, 1991).
Therapeutic agents
The
use of fluoride dentifrices is beneficial in the prevention of dental caries. Most
dentifrices today contain 0.1%(1000 ppm) fluoride, usually in the form of
sodium monofluorophosphate (MFP); 100 g of toothpaste containing 0.76 g MFP
(equivalent to 0.1 g fluoride). The concentration of fluoride in toothpaste is
limited in Australia to a maximum of 1000 ppm by a recommendation of the
Standard for Uniform Scheduling of Drugs and Poisons. The suggested toxic dose
of fluoride ion is 5 mg fluoride per kg body weight.6 For a 10 kg child, this
corresponds to approximately half the contents of a 90 g tube of toothpaste.
Therefore, young children should not be allowed unsupervised access to fluoride
dentifrices (Rolla, 1991).
A
review of fluoride benefits and risks by the U.S. Public Health Service
concluded from more than 50 human studies that no evidence existed showing an
association between fluoride and cancer. However, there is evidence of an
increase in the prevalence of mild dental fluorosis. The consumption of
excessive amounts of fluoride during enamel formation may result in dental fluorosis.
This is a continuum of changes in the enamel varying from fine white lines in
mild cases to very chalky, opaque enamel which breaks apart soon after tooth
eruption. Since fluoride appears to affect the activity of the ameloblast,
especially during the late secretion or early maturation of enamel, excessive
fluoride intake is of concern during the first 7 years of life. Toothpastes
have been identified as a significant source of fluoride for the young child.
The NHMRC has reported in its review of the effectiveness of fluoridation that
fluoride from toothpaste accounts for up to 53% of the total fluoride intake of
children aged two years (Whitford, 1987).
For
the purpose of enhancing the safe use of fluoride dentifrices by children,
several measures should be taken to minimize the risk of developing dental
fluorosis. Parents should be advised to supervise tooth cleaning closely using
only small (pea-size) quantities of toothpaste. Manufacturers should be
encouraged to market a low fluoride dentifrice (e.g.400-500 ppm fluoride) for
infant use. This level of fluoride in toothpaste, given that all other sources
are constant and low, should result in a total fluoride intake which does not
exceed the recommended upper limit of 0.07 mg/kg of body weight for a child
between 2 and 7 years of age. A low fluoride, sorbitol-based toothpaste
designed specifically for children is available (Colgate Junior Toothpaste) and
contains 0.304% MFP (400 ppm fluoride). Data from several independent studies
indicate that, although a dose-response relationship does exist for fluoride
levels in toothpaste and caries, use of a 400 ppm fluoride-containing paste by
children under 7 years of age instead of the standard 1000 ppm fluoride paste
should not increase their caries risk. There is currently no glycerol-based,
400-500 ppm fluoride toothpaste available in Australia (Machackov 1991).
In
addition to claims of the anticaries activity of fluoride, new therapeutic
dentifrices are being promoted to the public and the dental profession for the
control of dental plaque and gingivitis. Triclosan (2,4,4'-trichloro-2'-hydroxy
diphenyl ether), an antimicrobial agent used extensively in deodorants, soaps
and other dermatological preparations, is the active agent in these new
dentifrices. In various clinical studies, brushing with a 0.3%
triclosan-containing dentifrice when compared with a control paste resulted in
significant reductions in dental plaque formation and gingival inflammation.11
From animal toxicity, mutagenicity, teratogenicity and carcinogenicity studies,
as well as pharmacokinetic studies in man, it has been proposed by the major
toothpaste companies that 0.3% triclosan-containing toothpastes are safe for
human use (Machackova, 1991). However, the U.S.A. Food and Drug Administration
has stated that new drug approval will be required for a toothpaste containing
triclosan because the ingredient has not been used in any intra-oral drug or
cosmetic preparation previously.
Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects
FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!
+(234) 0814 780 1594
Login To Comment