EFFECT OF STEM PORTION AND NUMBER OF STAKES PER STAND ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF CASSAVA VARIETY – NR 8082

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00009300

No of Pages: 68

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦5000

  • $

ABSTRACT

Investigations were conducted to study the effects of stem portions and number of stakes per stand on crop establishment, growth and yield of cassava variety NR 8082 in a tropical ultisol of southeastern Nigeria during the 2016/17 and 2017/18 cropping seasons. In each year, the experiment was laid out as a 3 x 3 factorial, arranged in randomized complete block design with 3 replications. Treatments consisted of three stem portions of different physiological ages (top, middle and basal) and three numbers of stakes per stand (1, 2 and 3). The middle and basal stem portions significantly increased percent establishment, plant height, number of nodes per plant and leaf area index at 3 MAP but had no effect on stem girth, photosynthetic efficiency and number of storage roots per plant. The best stem portion for storage root yield was, however, the top portion which produced the highest yield on average. Number of stakes per stand did not significantly affect stem girth, number of nodes per plant and leaf area index but the use of 1 stake per stand increased number of storage roots per plant, root weight and storage root yield in 2017/18 cropping season. Averaged across two seasons, number of stakes per stand did not significantly influence storage root yield. Interactions between stem portion and number of stakes per stand did not significantly affect storage root yield of NR 8082 high cyanide cassava variety in both cropping seasons.







TABLE OF CONTENTS


Title page                                                                                                                                i

Declaration                                                                                                                             ii

Certification                                                                                                                            iii

Dedication                                                                                                                               iv

Acknowledgements                                                                                                                v

Table of contents                                                                                                                    vi

List of Tables                                                                                                                          viii

Abstract                                                                                                                                  ix

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

Introduction                                                                                                                1

Objectives                                                                                                                               4

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Growth, development and yield of cassava                                                                      5

2.2 Effect of stakes’ size and quality on cassava                                                                   5

2.3 Effect of stem portion on cassava                                                                                    7

2.4 Effect of number of stakes per stand on cassava                                                              8

2.5 Effect of plant population on cassava                                                                              10

CHAPTER 3: MATERIALS AND METHODS

3.1 The study site                                                                                                                    13

3.2 Planting materials                                                                                                             13

3.3 Field preparation and soil sampling                                                                                 15

3.4 Experimental design and treatments                                                                                15

3.5 Planting and field maintenance                                                                                        16

3.6 Data collection                                                                                                                 16

3.7 Statistical model and statistical analysis                                                                          18

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Soil and meteorological data                                                                                                  20

Crop establishment and growth                                                                                              20

Photosynthetic efficiency, yield and yield component                                                          30

Starch and dry matter content                                                                                                36

Discussion                                                                                                                               40

CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS                                       43

REFERENCES                                                                                                                     44

APPENDICES                                                                                                                       52

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIST OF TABLES


Table 3.1         The characteristics of cassava variety NR-8082                                            14

Table 4.1         The physical and chemical properties of soil of the study site.                 22

Table 4.2         Meteorological data of the experimental site from 2016 to 2018 cropping    season.                                                                                                                     23

Table 4.3         Effect of stem portions and number of stakes per stand on percentage establishment.                                                                                                      24

Table 4.4         Effect of stem portions and number of stakes per stand on plant height

(cm) at different sampling dates.                                                                    25

Table 4.5         Effect of stem portions and number of stakes per stand on stem girth at

different sampling dates.                                                                                27

Table 4.6         Effect of stem portions and number of stakes per stand on number of

Nodesper plant at different sampling dates.                                                   28

Table 4.7         Effect of stem portions and number of stakes per stand on leaf area index

at different sampling dates.                                                                            29

Table 4.8         Effect of stem portions and number of stakes per stand on photosynthetic

efficiency (Mj/m).                                                                                          32

Table 4.9         Effect of stem portions and number of stakes per stand on number of

Storage roots per plant.                                                                                   33

Table 4.10       Effect of stem portions and number of stakes per stand on storage root

weight (kg).                                                                                                     34

Table 4.11       Effect of stem portions and number of stakes per stand on storage root

yield (t/ha).                                                                                                     35

Table 4.12       Effect of stem portions and number of stakes per stand on mean storage

root yield.                                                                                                       37

Table 4.13       Effect of stem portions and number of stakes per stand on starch content. 38

Table 4.14       Effect of stem portions and number of stakes per stand on dry matter

content .                                                                                                           39       

 

 



 

 

 

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION


Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is a perennial woody shrub native to Latin America (Bellotti et al., 2011, El-sharkawy, 2012) and is primarily grown as an annual crop in the humid tropics. It belongs to the family Euphorbiaceae (Alves, 2002) with about five thousand known varieties (CIAT, 1993).It was first domesticated and grown as a food crop by the American Indians about 4000 years ago (Renoize, 1973). Today cassava is grown all over the tropical and subtropical zones (Latitude 300 North and South of the equator) at altitudes from sea level to 2300m; 18 to 350C temperature range; 600mm to more than 3000mm rainfall and in rich and poor soils of pH 4 to 9. The crop has also been found to have a very high productivity per unit of land area and labour than most other food crops.It is currently the world’s fourth most important staple and carbohydrate rich food crop (El-sharkawy, 2012). Cassava provides food for more than 800million people (FAO, 2007). It plays an important role in alleviating food problems because it thrives and produces stable yields under conditions in which other crops fail. It is a crop that is generally grown on marginal lands with a minimum of agricultural inputs (Hillocks et al., 2002). It is well known for its adaptation to poor soil conditions and responds well to better management practices. It is also resistant to drought (Chantaprasan and Wanapat, 2003).

In Africa, cassava is the single most important source of dietary energy for a large proportion of the population (Cock 2011). Tufan (2013) reiterated that no other continent depends on cassava to feed as many people as does Africa, where 500 million people consume it daily. Cassava is the second most important staple crop after maize, making the crop indispensable to food security in Africa. FAOSTAT (2013) indicates that out of a total world cassava production of 233,796,000 ton, Africa accounts for 51% followed by Asia with a production of 35%, and the remaining production of 14% going to the America. Though Africa’s cassava production is largely small-scale, it accounts for more than half of the world’s cassava, or about 86million tons from over 10million hectares (Tufan, 2013).

Nigeria is the largest producer of cassava in the world with a production figure of 52.4 million metric tons(FAO, 2008). It is a major food crop in Nigeria and is strategically valued for its role in food security, poverty alleviation and serves as source of raw material for agro-allied industries with huge potential for the export market (Egesi et al., 2007, CEDP, 2005). As human food, the cassava root is prepared in various forms such as garri, fufu, tapioca. Besides its use as food, it is a major industrial raw material for production of starch, alcohol, pharmaceutics, gums, confectionaries and livestock feed (Eke-Okoro et al., 1999). The leaves and tender shoots are important sources of vitamins, minerals and proteins (Balagopalan 2002; Nweke et al., 2002).

Despite the progress made in cassava research all over the world, there has been consistent instability in the yield of cassava within and across locations, production systems and between varieties grown under similar fertility regime and management. According to Okeke (1994), Okereke (1989) and FAO (1972), yield per stand can vary from 0 to over 20kg under similar growing conditions and management. This unstable yield is a problem in cassava growing areas and lack of precise knowledge of the contributory factors has continued to perpetuate this problem in cassava production. Toro and Atlee (1984) and Eke-Okoro et al., (2001), stated that in any production system, the size and quality of the stake are of fundamental importance for high yields. Poor quality planting material is often associated with marginal growth and productivity of cassava (Eke-Okoro et al., 1999).

It has been affirmed that stem part from which cutting is taken has effect on the yield of cassava (Chan et al., 1983). A mature cassava stem has three stem sections – hardwood (Basal portion), semi-hardwood (middle portion) and shoot tip (top portion).  Shoot tips are very fragile and have high mortality rate especially if they are subjected to moisture stress during the first month after planting. They have high water content and dehydrate rapidly. Cock 1985a reported that stake selection is important in achieving high stable yield. The use of the basal part of the stem for planting rather than the terminal has been suggested (Jennings, 1970) but the intrinsic merit of the basal part is not obvious except that it is the oldest tissue on the stem. Similarly, Enyi (1970) recommended the use of oldest section of the stem for higher tuber yield. However, Leihner (1983) studied the influence of tissue age and found that stakes from middle and lower part of the primary stem (older stakes) sprouted much faster and were more vigorous than stakes from the upper portion of primary stems and from secondary stems (younger stakes). CIAT (1979) reported that in early branching varieties, younger stakes (middle and upper portion of plant) gave greater yields.

The number of shoots per stand of cassava is likely to influence growth, development and yield stability in cassava either by competition between these shoots for nutrients and space or by increase in photosynthetic surfaces arising from production of more branches or leaves by the multiple shoots or stems Enyi (1972). These factors are likely to increase or reduce growth rate of individual shoots. Cassava stakes when planted usually produce many shoots which may give rise to competition for resources. The competition may be checked by reducing the number of shoots arising at emergence. Enyi (1972a) strongly believed that there may be reduction in the yield of multishoot plants because of competition for assimilate, thereby, reducing the amount of available assimilate for tuber growth. Shanmugha and Srinivasan (1973) investigated the influence of number of shoots per plant on the growth and yield of cassava and found that plants with two shoots out yielded the single and multi-shoot plants, registering narrow tuber-shoot ratio. Eke-Okoro (1997) also found that increasing shoot number from one to two improved growth, development and yield of cassava.

In the traditional farming systems, farmers usually plant one or more stakes per stand but the effect of such a practice on cassava productivity may depend on such factors as cultivar, cultural practices, quality of planting materials and location (Udealor and Asiegbu, 2005).

This study seeks to explore ways of integrating the best stem portion and number of stakes per stand to maximize yield.


OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the present study were to assess:

1.           The contributions of stem portions on the growth and yield of cassava variety –

 NR   8082.

2.           The influence of numbers of stakes per stand on the growth and yield of cassava variety

NR 8082.

3.       The effect of stem portion and number of stakes per stand on growth and yield of cassava variety NR 8082.

 


Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.

Review


To Comment