TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of Study
1.2 Problem Statement
1.3 Aim and Objectives
1.4 Scope of Work
1.5 Limitations
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Earthquake
2.2 Dynamic Loads
2.3 Degree of Freedom (DoF)
2.3.3 Reduction of Degrees of Freedom
2.3.4 Mass Lumping Method
2.4 Vibrations in Structures
2.4.1 Free Vibration
2.4.2 Forced Vibration
2.5 Damping
2.6 Inertia Force
2.7 Elastic Stiffness
2.8 Classical Displacement Method
2.9 Static Condensation
2.10 Stiffness Method
2.11 Finite Element Method
2.12 Equation of Motion for Multi Degree of Freedom Frame under Earthquake Excitation
2.13 Eigenvalue and Eigenvector Analysis
2.14 Natural Frequencies and Mode Shapes
2.15 Natural Modes
2.16 Difference between Dynamic and Static Problems
2.17 Computational Programs
2.18 MATLAB
2.20 Observations from Literature Review
2.21 Expected Original Contributions
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
3.2 The Assumptions of the Finite Element Model for the Dynamic Analysis
3. 3 The Finite Element Formulations
3.4 Equation of Motion for Multi Degree of Freedom Frame (MDOF) Under Earthquake Excitation
3.4.1 Equation of Motion for Force Vibration of an Undamped MDOF System
3.5 Validation (ANOVA)
3.6 Algorithm for Program Development
3.7 Numerical Analysis
3.7.1 Modeling and Analysis
CHAPTER 4
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Result Presentation
4.1.1 Results of Manual Analysis
4.1.2 Result Validation
4.1.3 Computer Results
4.2 Discussion of Results
4.2.1 Computer Programme for Determining the Static and Dynamic Responses of an MDOF Flexible Frame under Identical Support Excitation Due To Earthquake
4.2.2 Relationship between the Equation of Motion for Forced Vibration and the Static Analysis
4.2.3 Relationship between Forcing and Natural Frequency
4.2.4 Effect of Ground Acceleration on Forcing Frequency, Joint Displacement and Internal Stresses
4.2.5 Comparison between the Static Response and Dynamic Response
4.2.6 Effect of Maximum Ground Displacement on Forcing Frequency, Joint Displacement and Internal Stresses
4.2.7 Effect of Inertia Force on Dynamic Equilibrium
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1 Conclusion
5.2 Contribution to Knowledge
5.3 Recommendation:
REFERENCE
APPENDIX 1: The developed MATLAB program
APPENDIX 2: Forcing frequency Ө = 0
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF STUDY
In structural dynamics, structures may be excited by two kinds of source, external loading acting directly on the super structure and secondly the ground motion acting on the sub structure (Seyoum, 2016). In the latter case ground motion may be expressed as acceleration, velocity or displacement. In the analysis of structures under ground motion, the ground acceleration, velocity, and displacement are presumed to be known since they can be obtained directly from instrument readings. When any two of these parameters are specified, analysis could be carried out effectively. Since earthquake engineering is based on the expectation that structures undergo serious deformation, and possibly collapse during intense ground vibration caused by earthquake, the Structural Engineer, is interested in predicting the expected structural responses (Hoskuldur, 2016). The most important factors influencing earthquake ground motions are earthquake magnitude, distance from the source of energy release, local soil conditions, variation in geology and propagation velocity along the travel path, and earthquake source conditions and mechanism (fault type, slip rate, stress conditions, stress drop, etc.). Past earthquake records have been used to study some of these influences (Chopra, 2006).
Earthquake excitation of structural frames in general, is a complex process with a high variability in time and space. However, the support induced vibrations are the major causes of deformation and stress in the structural systems (Rajasekaram, 2009). The support excitations can be Identical or multiple in all supports.
For an identical-support excitation, it is assumed that all the supports undergo an identical (uniform) ground motion. In other words, due to the same ground motion at all supports, the supports move as one rigid base. Hence, the lumped masses at each floor are excited by the ground motion (Murty et al., 2017). Tall buildings with relatively small ground coverage are usually assumed to undergo identical support motion. For multi-support excitations, the ground support motions are different at various supports. This case is mostly seen in big network of pipe lines, very long tunnels, long dams, bridges, structures on soil with non-uniform ground properties or on buildings in a large land span (Murty et al., 2017).
The present study will develop a finite element displacement model for determining the dynamic response of multi-degree of freedom frames subjected to identical support excitation due to earthquake under prescribed ground motion (ground acceleration and displacement) using the lumped mass parameter and static condensation. A MATLAB computer program will be developed for the model.
1.2 PROBLEM STATEMENT
Given a multi-degree of freedom (MDOF) flexible frame with eight floors and three bays, it is required to carry out a dynamic analysis using the following parameters. The ground motion is defined by the ground acceleration U ̈g(t) and the maximum ground displacement XS, the lumped masses M1, M2, M3, …… M8 at the floors are excited by the ground motion to induce the effective earthquake forces P¬1(t), P¬2(t), P¬3(t), ……. P¬8(t) at the floor levels, where Pi(t) = MiU ̈g(t). The fundamental problem here is to use the idealized model to determine the dynamic response due to the induced earthquake forces. The term response is used in a general sense to include any quantity such as displacements, internal stresses, and natural frequencies of the structure. In the absence of any external force the response quantities are the natural frequencies. However, when the excitation is an external force the response quantities of interest are the displacements and the internal stresses. The relative displacement U(t) associated with deformation of the structure is the most important since the internal forces in the structure are directly related to U(t).
The process of formulating and solving the equation of motion for the finite element model shall be programmed in computer using MATLAB. The developed MATLAB program shall be used to carry out the dynamic analysis of a one bay, two story building and the results compared to the results obtained by manual approach using ANOVA for validation, after which the program will be extended to resolving a three bay, eight storey flexible frame.
1.3 AIM AND OBJECTIVES
The main aim of this research is to develop a Finite Element displacement model for determining the dynamic response of a multi-degree of freedom frame subjected to identical support excitation due to earthquake under prescribed motion.
The objectives of the study are:
i. To develop a MATLAB program that can efficiently analyze a multi-degree of freedom frame under identical support excitation due to earthquake.
ii. To extend the application of static condensation which hitherto has applied to shear frame model to the dynamic analysis of flexible frames.
iii. To develop a Finite Element displacement model.
iv. To validate the model by comparing analytical results obtained from the MATLAB program to results obtained from the conventional classical approach using ANOVA.
v. To determine the dynamic responses of a multi degree of freedom (MDOF) frame subjected to identical horizontal support excitation due to earthquake under prescribed motion.
vi. To use the developed program to carry out parametric studies for various values of ground acceleration and maximum ground displacement of the frame structure.
1.4 SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work here includes the determination of the dynamic response of multi-degree of freedom (MDOF) flexible frame. Responses to be considered include natural frequencies, displacements and internal stresses. The static response will be used for comparison with the dynamic response. However, stability analysis is outside the scope of this work. Frames with stiffened joints and shear frames will not be considered. A finite element displacement model synthesized in a MATLAB program shall be used as analytical tool.
1.5 LIMITATIONS
The numerical model cannot be used for non-linear analysis; as it only considers linear elastic responses.
Experimental studies will not be used to validate the model due to the cost of procuring such sophisticated equipment needed for such experiment.
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment