ABSTRACT
African leafy
vegetables (ALVs) have a great potential in reducing the gap in nutritional
status between low- and high-income households because of their nutrient
densities and affordability. Cowpea is one of the major ALVs produced and
consumed widely at the Coast and Western regions of Nigeria as a dual-purpose
crop (grain and leaf). Although local cowpea accessions are preferred by farmers
and consumers, there are still many challenges encountered. There is lack of
sufficient information on nutrients and micro-nutrient densities
and high postharvest losses. High post-harvest losses have also been reported as a result
of perishability. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the
nutritional and sensory attributes of five popular dual purpose local cowpea
accessions and an improved variety developed by KALRO. In addition, the effect
of blanching, solar drying and modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) on the shelf
life and quality attributes of one superior cowpea accession was evaluated.
The cowpeas were
planted in The University of Uyo field station during the short rains from
October to December 2014 and long rains from March to May 2015. The cowpea
leaves were randomly sampled in the
experimental plots. One superior accession was chosen for post-harvest
treatments. The treatments were, solar drying without blanching, blanching in
pure water and solar drying, blanching in salty water and solar drying and
fresh non-blanched leaves as control. The samples were then analysed for
proximates, vitamins, minerals, anti-nutrients, sensory characteristics, colour
change during processing and packaging, cumulative water loss and wilting in
The University of Uyo and Jomo University of Agriculture and Technology
laboratories.
In the first
objective on evaluating and comparing nutritional attributes of local cowpea
accessions with an improved variety, beta carotene content of M66 which is an
improved variety was the lowest at 29.71mg/100g whereas Sura Mbaya had the
highest beta carotene content at 36.4mg/100g. On the other hand, M66 had the
lowest ascorbic acid content of 192.8 mg/100g whereas Usimpe Mtu Mdogo had the
highest ascorbic acid content at 213.1mg/100g
in season 1. The iron content of Usimpe Mtu Mdogo was the lowest at
395.9PPM compared to Mnyenze at 1034.3 PPM in season 1.
In the second
objective of evaluating the efficacy of post-harvest treatments on the quality
of fresh and processed cowpeas, it was found that blanching
and dehydration had little effect
on most proximate and mineral
elements. However, vitamin and total phenolic contents were the most affected.
Solar drying without blanching recorded the highest vitamin retention levels at
68.02% for beta carotene and 68.39% for ascorbic acid unlike blanching in pure
water and solar drying at 55.58% for beta carotene and 21.08% for ascorbic acid
and blanching in salty water and
solar drying at 52.78% beta carotene and 20.24% ascorbic acid. In addition,
solar drying without blanching recorded
the highest retention total phenolic content at 149.91%. Blanching in pure water and solar drying and
blanching in salty water and solar drying recorded retention levels of 62.58%
and 65.79% of total phenolic content respectively. On the other hand, solar
drying without blanching, blanching in pure water and solar drying and
blanching in salty water and solar drying recorded a loss of 5.87%, 10.77% and
11.17% of oxalates and 37.22%, 69.98% and 58.7% of nitrates respectively.
In the samples
subjected to MAP, the end stage of control, ordinary polythene bag and Extend
bag under room conditions was 1 day, 4 days and 6 days respectively. By the end
stage control, ordinary polythene bag and Extend® bag had lost
28.84%, 0.93% and 3.27% cumulative weight for season 1 and 23.84%, 0.89% and
2.31% for season 2 respectively.
The results of the
present study indicated that evaluated local cowpea accessions were comparable
with each other but slightly superior to the improved variety developed by
KALRO. Solar drying without blanching was found to be effective in maintaining
the quality attributes of cowpeas. In addition, MAP was found to be effective
in preserving quality of fresh cowpea leaves and improving shelf life.
Therefore MAP and solar drying without blanching are simple and convenient
technologies for preserving cowpea nutrients and improving shelf life.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1.
Problem statement
1.2.
Justification of the study
1.3.
General objective
1.3.1.
Specific objectives
1.3.2.
Null hypotheses
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.0
Nutrition status in Nigeria
2.1
African leafy vegetables (ALVs) in Nigeria
2.2
Botany and centre
of origin of cowpeas
2.3
Cowpea morphology
2.4
Uses of cowpea
2.5
Ecological growth requirements of cowpeas
2.5.1
Temperatures
2.5.2
Rainfall
2.5.3
Edaphic factors and fertilizer application of ALVs
2.5.4
Light intensity
2.6
Nutritional composition of ALVs
2.6.1
Anti-oxidative activities of ALVs
2.6.2
Minerals constituents of ALVs
2.6.3
Other macro-nutrients
2.6.4
Anti-nutrient content in ALVs
2.7
Post-harvest losses of cowpeas and other ALVs
2.8
Post-harvest management
2.9
Sensory properties of AIVs
CHAPTER THREE
EVALUATION OF NUTRITIONAL QUALITY ATTRIBUTES OF SELECTED SUPERIOR LOCAL
LEAFY COWPEA ACCESSIONS AND AN IMPROVED
VARIETY
3.1.
ABSTRACT
3.2.
INTRODUCTION
3.3.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
3.3.1.
Cowpea accessions under study
3.3.2.
Site description
3.3.3.
Experimental set up and preparation of cowpea leaves
3.3.4.
Moisture content
3.3.5.
Ash
3.3.6.
Minerals
3.3.7.
Crude protein content
3.3.8.
Crude fibre
3.3.9.
carotenes
3.3.10.
Ascorbic acid
3.3.11.
Nitrates
3.3.12.
Oxalates
3.3.13.
Total phenolic content
3.3.14.
Sensory evaluation
3.3.15.
Statistical analysis
3.4.
RESULTS
3.4.1.
Proximate analysis
3.4.2.
Beta carotene, ascorbic
acid and total phenols
3.4.3.
Mineral elements
3.4.4.
Nitrates and oxalates
3.4.5.
Sensory evaluation
3.5.
DISCUSSION
CHAPTER FOUR
EFFICACY OF POST-HARVEST TREATMENTS IN MAINTAINING THE QUALITY ATTRIBUTES OF
COWPEA LEAVES
4.1.
INTRODUCTION
4.2.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
4.3.
PARAMETERS ANALYSED
4.4.1.
Sensory evaluation
4.4.2.
Colour change evaluation
4.4.3.
Cumulative weight loss (percentage)
4.4.4.
Wilting
4.4.5.
Statistical analysis
4.4.
RESULTS
4.5.1.
Proximate analysis
4.5.2.
Beta carotene, ascorbic
acid and total
phenols
4.5.3.
Mineral elements
4.5.4.
Nitrates and oxalates
4.5.5.
Colour change during
processing
4.5.6.
Sensory quality analysis
4.5.7.
Cumulative weight loss
4.5.8.
Wilting
4.5.9.
Colour change of fresh cowpea
leaves in MAP
4.5.
DISCUSSION
4.6.
CONCLUSION
CHAPTER FIVE
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
REFERENCES
APPENDICES
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.0 Background
to the Study
Agriculture has
been the mainstay of Nigeria’s economy for decades. The sector contributes to
nutrition, food security, employment and foreign exchange earnings. According
to The Nigeria Economic Report (2013), agricultural sector directly accounts
for about 26% of Nigeria’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and 27% indirectly
through linkages with manufacturing, distribution and other service related
sectors. The sector declined from a growth rate of 4.2% in the year 2012 to 2.9% in 2013 partly due to
inadequate rainfall received in some growing regions in the country but increased to 3.5% in 2014 (Economic
Survey highlights, 2014 and 2015). Agriculture industry accounts for 65% of Nigeria’s
total exports, 18% and 60% of the formal and total employment, respectively. In
addition it directly and indirectly supports the livelihood of 80% of the
population living in the rural areas (Nigeria Economic Report, 2013). According
to economic survey (2015), the value
of marketed agricultural production declined marginally from Ksh 334.8 billion in 2013 to 333.2 billion in 2014.
The horticulture
sector has been a major contributor to the good performance of the agricultural
sector. In the year 2012 and 2013, the subsector contributed 26% and 25%
respectively to the agricultural growth by value (Economic survey, 2014). By
quantity, fresh horticultural produce contributed 205,700T in 2012, 213, 800Tin
2013 and 220,200T in 2014 becoming second after tea (Economic Survey highlights, 2014 and 2015). These statistics should be taken as an
estimate to the actual horticultural growth since most of the horticultural
commodities such as African leafy vegetables
do not reach formal markets or export. In addition, many surveys do not inform
of the farm gate prices of vegetables, farm level production quantity and value
at the local and informal markets. Considering this situation, the
horticultural subsector may be having far much more positive impact to the
population than it is estimated.
The horticulture
sector is made up of subsectors which include flower and ornamental, fruit and
vegetable production. According to HCD report (2014), vegetables occupied the
largest production portion at 32% by value, followed by flowers at 30%, fruits
at 30%, and nuts at 5%. The major export destination is the European Union
where the horticulture industry command about
30% market share. In general,
vegetable production in Nigeria has been increasing steadily over the past
years. In 2012, the quantity of vegetables exported was 66,352 tonnes valued at
Ksh.20226 million. In 2013 exports increased to 77172 tonnes valued at
Ksh.22923 million and in 2014, exports slightly reduced to 70335T valued at
Ksh.18781 million (HCD Annual Report, 2014). Considering the report touched on
exports, it means that the production is larger since the consumption in the
country is larger compared to the exports. The major producing counties as
reflected by exports include Meru, Bungoma, Murang’a, Kiambu and Kirinyaga in
that order (HCD Annual Report, 2014).
Vegetable
production is widely practised in the country. The development of the sector is
due to the readily available markets with a higher marginal return per unit
areas compared to cereal crops. Vegetable production has short growth cycles
enabling farmers to have two to three seasons in a year. This combination, in
addition to emerging health issues has placed vegetable production at a
strategic position to expand even more.
Vegetables can be
classified as exotic or indigenous depending on their origin, utilization and
commercialization. Some exotic vegetables commercialized in Nigeria include
kales, spinach, snow peas, French beans among others whereas indigenous
vegetables include African nightshade, spider plant, cowpeas, amaranth among
others. Major export vegetables comprise of exotic and Asian vegetables (EPC,
2014). Current trends have seen the incorporation of value addition strategies
to ensure continuous availability and reduction of postharvest losses. Such
strategies include canning, freezing, solar drying and/or roasting in addition
to pre-packs for fresh produce meant
for supermarkets.
Unlike other type
of vegetables, trade and consumption of African leafy vegetables had been
side-lined to serve the local population
especially in the rural areas
or among the poor and denied entry to formal markets.
However, the HCD report,(2014) indicated that there has been a tremendous
increase in production in ALVs in the country. This can be attributed to the
awareness created to the population on the health benefits and nutritional
superiority of these vegetables (Abukutsa, 2007) and value chain support by
non-governmental organisations. As a result, in 2014 the acreage under ALVs
increased by 10% and the yields and value rose by 5.6% and 6.2%, respectively
(HCD Annual Report, 2014). According to AVRDC (2010), it is estimated that
approximately 9000 tonnes of ALVs have been sold to formal and informal markets
in the period between 2008 and 2010 in central Nigeria only.
Table 1: Performance of African Leafy vegetables 2012-2014
|
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
Crop
|
Area (Ha)
|
Quantity (Ton)
|
Value
Kshs (million)
|
Area (Ha)
|
Quantity (Ton)
|
Value
Kshs (million)
|
Area (Ha)
|
Quantity (Ton)
|
Value
Kshs (million)
|
African
Nightshade
|
2,820
|
18,945
|
505
|
3,018
|
29,796
|
561
|
3,376
|
25,435
|
763
|
Spider
plant
|
2,273
|
20,134
|
455.1
|
2,239
|
20,912
|
529.1
|
2,435
|
16,752
|
640.5
|
Cowpeas
|
25,544
|
69,940
|
910
|
23,195
|
55,223
|
764
|
24,431
|
65,096
|
622
|
Jute
mallow
|
1,708
|
7,919
|
215
|
2,096
|
10,269
|
251.1
|
1,832
|
9,290
|
284.5
|
Leaf
Amaranth
|
1,035
|
9,913
|
208.3
|
1,187
|
12,208
|
227.7
|
1,586
|
17,001
|
195.6
|
Pumpkin
leaves
|
797
|
3,948
|
107.8
|
877
|
4,552
|
119.4
|
921
|
4,602
|
129.2
|
Rattle pod
|
286
|
1,984
|
43.2
|
370
|
2,780
|
58.2
|
533
|
5,100
|
119.1
|
Grain
Amaranth
|
525
|
3,951
|
85.3
|
445
|
1,856
|
63.3
|
389
|
2,057
|
70
|
Total
|
34,988
|
136,734
|
2,530
|
33,427
|
137,596
|
2,574
|
35,503
|
145,333
|
2,824
|
Source: HCD report (2014).
Nigeria,
like many other tropical countries, is endowed with a great diversity of ALVs.
These vegetables have a great social and economic importance for the local
communities therefore making them part and parcel of their culture. The
priority species grown and marketed in Nigeria include African nightshades (Solanum spp), amaranth (Amaranthus spp.), spider plant (Cleome gynandra), cowpeas (Vigna
unguiculata), Ethiopian kale (Brassica
carinata), ‘mitoo’ (Crotalaria ochroleuca and C. brevidens)), ‘kahuhura’ (Cucurbita ficifolia), jute plant (Corchorus olitorius) and pumpkin leaves
(Cucurbita maxima and C. moschata). (Irungu
et al., 2007). Among the ALVs,
African nightshade accounted for 27% of market value followed by Spider plant and Cowpeas
at 23% and 22% respectively in 2014 (HCD report, 2014). However, in terms of quantity
produced, cowpea outperformed all other ALVs from 2012 to 2014 as shown in Table 1.
Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) is an important grain
legume in tropical and subtropical regions where a shortage of animal protein
sources is often experienced (Tshovhote et
al., 2003). Although a lot of
emphasis has been put on the grain crop, the high potential in the vegetable has not been fully exploited (Abukutsa,
2003).
1.1 Problem
Statement
Cowpea leaves has
been viewed as a woman’s crop and therefore it has received little attention
from stakeholders (Abukutsa, 2003).Nutritional information and quality among
the cultivated cowpea varieties is scanty (Muchoki et al., 2007). However, the situation is worse among local cowpea
accessions although they are preferred by farmers because of superior taste and
palatability compared to improved varieties such as KVU, K-80 and M66 (KARI,
2010). The information available on the nutritional quality of cowpea leaves
has been restricted to improved varieties and some few local accessions (Mamiro
et al., 2011). However, the
nutritional information available for the few lines studied has recorded a very
large variability. For instance Mamiro et
al., (2011) indicated that cowpeas crude protein ranges from 18 to 25%,
Okonya and Maass (2014) found the protein content to be between 29.4 to 34.3%
whereas, Ono et al., (1996) recorded
as high as 43% crude protein content. On the other hand, ascorbic acid levels
reported range of between 33.5mg/100g to 308 mg/100g (Muchoki et al., 2007; Ahenkora et al., 1998; Njoroge et al., 2015).
The potential of
cowpea leaves has not been maximized due to post-harvest handling limitations
(Affognona et al., 2014). It is
estimated that post-harvest losses contribute to about 50% of total losses in
the cowpea value chain (Masarirambi et
al., 2010). The high losses can be attributed to lack of proper
post-harvest knowledge, high perishability, poor processing practises and
inefficient or high cost
of post-harvest technologies. The situation is worsened during
the periods of glut where
production of these vegetables exceeds market demand.
1.2 Justification of the study
Local cowpea accessions
have important significance to farmers although their nutritional quality
has not extensively assessed (KARI,
2010). Nutritional profiling
of superior local
cowpea accessions study will
compliment or add new information that will help in sensitizing the entire
population to enhance utilization of cowpea vegetable. Ilelaboye et al., (2013) indicated that adequate
nutritional information on ALVs will be useful for nutritional education to the
public especially the vulnerable groups as a means to improving their nutritional status. The information will also enable further improvement of the local
accessions which are thought to be adapted to wide range of climatic conditions
(D’Andrea et al., 2007).
The high
post-harvest losses on cowpea vegetable have led to led to decreased
availability of the vegetable in households and markets (Shiundu
and Oniang’o, 2007).
The existing technologies to reduce post-harvest have been inefficient or expensive to the
resource constrained farmer. Such technologies include sun drying,
fermentation, charcoal cooling and refrigeration (Muchoki et al., 2007). However,
very few technologies that suit small scale farmers been evaluated. Low cost
methods of improving and lengthening shelf life such as modified atmosphere
packaging and solar drying have been
proposed (Chavasit et al., 2002) but
have not been tested for ALVs. The reduction in post-harvest losses will be
improved nutritional and food security and income.
1.3
General objective
To evaluate the
nutritional quality attributes of local cowpea accessions and reduce loss of
the quality attributes to improve the shelf life and enhance availability of
quality vegetables and improve food security.
1.3.1
Specific objectives
1.
To compare the nutritional quality attributes of
selected superior local leafy cowpeas accessions with an improved variety.
2.
To evaluate the effect of blanching, solar drying and
modified atmosphere packaging on the quality attributes and shelf life of
cowpeas leaves.
1.3.2
Null hypotheses
1. Selected
superior local cowpea accessions have similar nutritional content compared to the improved variety.
2. Blanching, solar
drying and modified
atmosphere packaging does not preserve
quality and does not improve the shelf life of cowpea leaves.
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment