ABSTRACT
The bacteriological quality and antibiogram of isolates of public health importance from twenty (20) samples of Hamburgers was investigated. The bacteriological quality of the burger samples were performed using standard microbiological method. The mean bacterial load of the samples from the different locations revealed that the counts were within the range of 4.1x105cfu/g to 6.4x105cfu/g. It was observed that the hamburger samples had the following prevalence; Escherichia coli (35%), Salmonella (13%) and Staphylococcus aureus (65%). For the E. coli isolates, 100% were resistant to ceftazidime, 100% to Augmentin and 71.4% to ceftriaxone. All the E. coli isolates were sensitive to Ciprofloxacin and Gentamicin. The results showed that the resistance of S. aureus isolates to Gentamicin, Augmentin, Ceftriaxone and Nitrofurantoin were 23.1%, 84.6%, 46.1% and 38.5% respectively. Percentage susceptibility levels of the S. aureus isolates to ofloxacin and nitrofurantoin were 76.9% and 61.5%, respectively. Multidrug resistant strains of S. aureus as well as the other isolates obtained in this study poses a risk factor for the public health. The results indicate that hamburgers could be a reservoir of E. coli. Since this strain is a food-borne pathogen, inspection of meat products for this bacterium is recommended.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
Page
Certification
Dedication
Acknowledgements
Table
of Contents
List
of Tables
List
of Figures
Abstract
Chapter One: Introduction
1.0
Introduction 1
1.1 Aim and Objectives 4
Chapter Two
2.0 Literature Review 5
2.1 Overview
of Hamburgers 5
2.2 History of Hamburger 5
2.3 Nutritional Attributes of Hamburgers 7
2.3.1 Preparation and Storage of Burger 7
2.4 Microorganisms
found in Meat 8
2.4.1 Listeria monocytogenes 8
2.4.2 Salmonella 10
2.4.3 Escherichia coli 11
2.4.4 Staphylococcus
aureus 12
2.5 Contamination
during Handling and Processing 13
2.5.1 Meat as Source of Contamination of Burgers 15
2.6 Consequences of Food-Borne
Diseases from Microorganisms 19
2.7 Studies on Isolation of
Microorganisms from Burgers 21
2.8 Antimicrobial
Resistance 23
2.8.1 Transmission between Human and
Animal due to Indirect Pathways
24
2.8.2 Direct
Pathways 24
2.8.3 Food-borne Transmission
25
2.9 Ensuring Food Safety of a Hamburger 26
Chapter Three
3.0 Materials
and Methods 27
3.1 Sample
Collection 27
3.2 Sterilization
of Equipments 27
3.2.1 Culture
Media Preparation 27
3.3 Isolation,
Enumeration and Identification
27
3.4 Gram
staining 28
3.5 Biochemical
Tests 29
3.5.1 Catalase
Test 29
3.5.2 Indole
Production Test 29
3.5.3 Citrate
Utilization Test 29
3.5.4 Hydrogen
Sulfide Production Test 30
3.5.5 Methyl
Red Test 30
3.5.6 Voges-Proskauer
test 30
3.5.7 Urease
Test 30
3.6 Antibiotics
Susceptibility testing 30
Chapter Four
4.0 Results 32
Chapter Five
5.0 Discussion
and Conclusion 41
5.1 Discussion 41
5.2 Conclusion 44
References 45
LIST OF TABLES
Tables
|
Title
|
Page
|
4.1
|
Mean Heterotrophic count of the
Hamburger samples
|
33
|
4.2
|
Colonial Morphology and Biochemical Characteristics of the
isolates
|
34
|
4.3
|
Percentage Occurrence of the Organisms
|
35
|
4.4
|
Occurrence of the Isolates
amongst the Eateries
|
40
|
LIST OF FIGURES
Figures
|
Title
|
Page
|
4.1
|
Antibiotic
Susceptibility Profile of Enterobacter
species isolated from Hamburger Samples
|
36
|
4.2
|
Antibiotic
Susceptibility Profile of Salmonella
species isolated from Hamburger Samples
|
37
|
4.3
|
Antibiotic
Susceptibility Profile of Escherichia
coli isolated from Hamburger Samples
|
38
|
4.4
|
Antibiotic
Susceptibility Profile of Staphylococcus
aureus isolated from Hamburger Samples
|
39
|
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Food
poisoning and food safety have become very topical subjects, eliciting a great
deal of public concern to many people all over the world. This is a result of
emerging foodborne pathogens that continue to cause outbreaks of food borne
diseases in different countries (WHO, 2013). A wide variety of diseases are
caused by eating food contaminated with pathogenic microorganisms or their
products; by no means all these diseases can be classed as food poisoning. Foodborne
disease outbreaks have heightened the awareness of foodborne pathogens as a
public health problem around the world (Koutsoumanis et al., 2008).
Food
security is a complex issue, where animal proteins such as meats, meat
products, fish and fishery products are generally regarded as a high risk
commodity to infection and toxication (Yousef et al., 2008). These food
borne infections and the consequent illnesses are some of the major
international challenges that lead to high mortality and economic loss (Adak et
al., 2005). In the industrialized world, food borne infection cause
considerable illnesses that heavily affect healthcare systems (Adak et al., 2005;
Clarence et al., 2009). Safe food is a major global public health
concern and is a basic human right (Ercolini et al., 2006). Foodborne
illnesses (with symptoms of diarrhea and vomiting) are often not considered
serious health threats in most developing nations and typically go unreported (Olesen
and Jespersen, 2010). The lack of effective surveillance systems is the main
reason for underreporting and the consequent inaccurate estimation of the burden
associated with foodborne diseases.
Fecal
contamination of raw and cooked meats, sandwiches and other foods has been
identified as the cause of foodborne illness in many parts of the world
(Koutsoumanis et al., 2008). A wide
spectrum of pathogenic microorganisms (Salmonella,
Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Bacillus cereus, and Shigella) has been identified in
contaminated food products (mostly meat, dairy products, fish, and rice).
Beef
burgers are important and popular food items of highly nutritious and highly
desirable foods for human being, on the other hand, they are considered as an
ideal culture medium for growth of many organisms because of the high moisture,
the high percentage of nitrogenous compounds, plentiful supply of minerals,
some fermentable carbohydrates (glycogen) and of a favorable pH for most
microorganisms resulting in their spoilage, economic losses, foodborne
infections in human and health risk (Pennacchia et al., 2011).
The
quality of meat product used in making the hamburgers may be compromised as
they may be contaminated during processing from the hands of workers, workers
clothes, knives, the hide, the gut or from the environment and transportation
resulting in an inferior or even unfit quality for human consumption. The most
important bacterial pathogens in beef meat and meat products that are
responsible for food-borne infections include E. coli, Salmonellae,
coagulase positive S. aureus and Pseudomonas.
Pelczar
et al. (2006) reported
the prevalence of Campylobacter spp.,
Staphylococcus spp.,
Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Yersinia spp. and Listeria
on meat, sea foods, beef burger sandwiches, poultry products and on the
hands of food workers (Pelczar et al., 2006).
Food
spoilage is defined as any change that makes a product unacceptable for human
consumption. It can result from different causes involving physical-chemical
and biochemical changes and also microbial growth and activity. In particular,
microbial growth and activity are the most important causes of reduction of
quality and shelf life of foods. Food borne diseases are diseases resulting
from ingestion of bacteria, toxins and also cells produced by microorganisms
present in food (Clarence et al., 2009). The intensity of the signs and
symptoms may vary with the amount of contaminated food ingested and
susceptibility of the individuals to the toxin.
Meat
and meat products are sometimes contaminated with germs after leaving the
manufacture plant and during handling (Stagniitta et al., 2006). Hygiene
conditions are poor when foods are produced in non-industrial establishments,
mainly due to insufficient monitoring during processing. These contaminated
food ends up infecting or intoxicating children, elderly and immunosupressed
individuals who are highly susceptible (Stagnitta et al., 2006). Meat is an important source of protein
and a valuable commodity in resource-poor communities (Datt et al., 2003;
Garcia, 2007). However, while meat is a rich nutrient source, it can also be a
potential vehicle of human foodborne illnesses (FAO/WHO, 2013). Inappropriate
slaughtering and retail operation can compromise food safety and more so, in
densely populated areas like informal settlements (Garcia, 2007). Slaughtering
process is frequently unhygienic and this makes meat to be easily contaminated.
Meat products from such condition often deteriorate rapidly and pose a health
hazard (Datt et al., 2003; FAO/WHO, 2013).
The
spoilage of meat can occur as strong off-odours and off-flavours,
discoloration, superficial slime, uncontrolled acidification, putrefaction and
presence of fluorescence (Nychas et al.,
2008). Wide ranges of microorganisms
from different sources can be transferred onto meat at different moments of the
production: before the slaughter, during slaughter and post mortem.
Before the slaughter, the contamination is usually due to intestinal
microorganisms and it happens if the animal is much stressed or under ill
health. During the slaughter it is caused by environmental and intestinal
bacteria, conveyed by contaminated tools, operators and delayed evisceration.
The post mortem contamination is due to environmental microorganisms and
usually affects the surface of meat (Volonterio, 2005).
Since
the first use of antimicrobial agents for the treatment of bacterial
infections, the problem of acquired resistance has been notified. In both
veterinary and human medicine, the prevalence of resistant strains rises year
after year. This could be a public health risk, especially when there is
transmission of antimicrobial resistance from one species to another and in
particular to human.
1.1 Aims and Objectives
i.
To isolate and identify
bacteria of public health importance on the hamburgers.
ii.
To determine the
bacteriological load on hamburgers from different fast foods and supermarkets
iii.
To ascertain the antibiotic
susceptibility profile of the organisms isolated from hamburgers.
Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects
FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!
+(234) 0814 780 1594
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment