ABSTRACT
The study evaluated the antibacterial activity of various concentrations of two honey varieties (Umudike honey and Nsuka honey) against three (3) wound infection isolates; Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Test organisms were obtained from the Microbiology laboratory of the Federal Medical Centre, Umuahia and confirmed by standard techniques based on their morphological appearance, Gram staining reaction, motility and biochemical characteristics. Antibacterial activity of the honey samples against the test isolates were assessed using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) and inhibitory zone diameter (IZD) at dilutions of 100%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25% and 3.125% respectively. Both honey varieties produced observable in-vitro antibacterial effects on all the organisms at 100% and 50%. Nsuka honey produced better antibacterial effects against the test isolates than the Umudike honey. The MIC of the Umudike and Nsuka honey ranged from 25-50% and 12.5 - 25% respectively. While the MBC of the Umudike and Nsuka honey ranged from 50-100% and 25-50% respectively. The study concluded that honey even at diluted strength can be used in the treatment of skin infections (burns, scalds and wounds) especially those associated with Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Cover
page i
Title
page ii
Dedication iii
Certification
iv
Acknowledgement v
Table
of contents vi
List of
tables viii
Abstract x
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1
Aim of study 2
CHAPTER
TWO
2.0
Review of literature 3
2.1
Historical uses of honey 3
2.2
Economics 5
2.3
Composition of honey 5
2.3.1
Carbohydrates 5
2.3.2
Proteins, enzymes and amino acids 6
2.3.3
Vitamins, minerals and trace compounds 7
2.3.4
Aroma compounds, taste-building compounds and polyphenols 8
2.3.5
Free Radicals 8
2.4
Antioxidants 10
2.5
Mode of action of antioxidants 12
2.6
Health effects of honey 12
2.6.1
Anti-inflammatory effects 12
2.6.2
Immunoactivating and immunosuppressive properties 13
2.6.3
Gastroenterological effects 13
2.6.4
Cardiovascular effects 14
CHAPTER
THREE
3.0 Materials
and methods 15
3.1 Study area 15
3.2 Materials 15
3.3 Sample collection 15
3.4 Test organisms 15
3.5 Confirmation of test isolate 15
3.5.1
Morphological appearance 16
3.5.2 Gram
staining 16
3.5.3 Motility test 16
3.5.4
Biochemical tests 17
3.6 Preparation of honey samples 19
3.7 Antimicrobial susceptibility testing 19
3.7.1 Agar-well diffusion method 19
3.7.2 Minimum
inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal
concentration
(MBC) test 20
CHAPTER
FOUR
4.0 Result
21
CHAPTER
FIVE
5.0 Discussion, conclusion and
recommendation 30
5.1 Discussion 30
5.2
Conclusion 32
5.3
Recommendations 32
REFERENCE
|
LIST
OF TABLES
|
|
TABLE
|
TITLE
|
PAGE
|
1
|
Morphological Characteristics of the Isolates
|
22
|
2
|
Biochemical
Identification Of Isolates
|
23
|
3
|
Diameter
of zones of inhibition (mm) of the honey preparations against S. aureus
|
24
|
4
|
Diameter
of zones of inhibition (mm) of the honey preparations against E. coli
|
25
|
5
|
Diameter
of zones of inhibition (mm) of the honey preparations against P. aeruginosa
|
26
|
6
|
MIC,
MBC of honey preparations against S.
aureus (%)
|
27
|
7
|
MIC,
MBC of honey preparations against E.
coli (%)
|
28
|
8
|
MIC, MBC of honey preparations against P. aeruginosa (%)
|
29
|
CHAPTER ONE
1.0
INTRODUCTION
The
continuous use of antibiotics in clinical practice has been the direct cause of
the development of multiple antibiotic resistances among bacteria causing human
infection (Mandal et al., 2002). To combat such bacterial resistance
to antibiotic, scientists discovered natural sources like medicinal plants of
non-antibiotic drugs having antibacterial potentiality (Mandal et al., 2010, Amin et al., 2010, Kumar et al., 2009).
Beside
the medicinal plants, the antibacterial activity of honey against many
different life threatening bacteria has been reported (Tan et al., 2009, Kingsley, 2001 and Chambers, 2006). Wilkinson (2005)
determined the activity of 13 different honey samples, including three
commercial antibacterial honeys, against Escherichia
coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
It has been reported that honey showed both bacteriostatic and bactericidal
effect against gram positive as well as gram-negative bacteria, and also exhibited
anti-fungal activity (Basson and Grobler, 2008 and Nasir et al 2010). Chauhan et al.,
(2010) reported that the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum
bactericidal concentration (MBC) of honey ranged 0.625-5.000 mg/mL for the
clinical isolates of E. coli, P.
aeruginosa and Salmonella
enterica serovar Typhi (S. enterica serovar Typhi). Another study revealed
honey MIC 11% for Pseudomonas
isolates (Mullai and Menon, 2005).
Moreover,
honey represents the oldest traditional medicines in the treatment of
respiratory ailment, gastrointestinal infection and various other diseases. It
is being used effectively as a dressing for wounds (including surgical wounds),
burns, and skin ulcers to reduce pain and odour quickly. Honey has been
reported to maintain moist wound environment that promotes healing, and its
high viscosity helps to provide a protective barrier to prevent infection; in
addition, the mild acidity and low-level hydrogen peroxide release help in
tissue repairing and contribute to the antibacterial activity (Lusby et al., 2005). The study is aimed at
evaluating the in-vitro antibacterial activity of two types of against clinical
isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, E.
coli, and P. aeruginosa.
1.1 AIM OF STUDY
The
aim of the study is to evaluate the antibacterial activity of two different
honeys on clinical isolates of Staphylococcus
aureus, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa.
The
specific objectives of the study are;
i.
To determine the Minimum
inhibitory concentration of honey
ii.
To determine the Minimum
bacteriocidal concentration of honey
Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects
FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!
+(234) 0814 780 1594
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment