ABSTRACTS The study analysed students’ agricultural research projects presented for the award of degrees in the department of rural sociology and extension, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike (2000-2015). The study identified all the students’ research projects carried out in the Department from 2000- 2015; examined the gender segregation of the project authors and analyzed research topics by areas of specialization in Extension and Rural Sociology. The population of the study was drawn from all the B. Agric, PGD, M.Sc. and Ph.D works in the Departmental library from 2000 – 2015. Data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics such as frequency and percentages. The major results showed that 59.5%, 61.1%, 57.8% and 67.39% of the B.Agric, PGD, M.Sc. and Ph.D students respectively were carried out by male. The result revealed that 34.5% of the research carried out by B.Agric the students were on gender. A large proportion (66.7%) of the PGD students’ research on crop related research topics, 35.6% of the MSc. students researched on crop related, and a large proportion (68%) of the respondents researched on rural development topics. The study concluded that the Department has graduated more male students than female students and that the students majored more on rural development, crop, gender, extension service, ICT and agricultural communication related topics. The study recommended that more students should be admitted into the department especially female students as this will enhance wider coverage in research and equally enable gender balance among the future extension agents.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Title Page
|
i
|
Declaration
|
ii
|
Certification
|
iii
|
Dedication
|
iv
|
Acknowledgements
|
v
|
Table of Contents
|
vi
|
List Tables
|
vii
|
Abstract
|
ix
|
CHAPTER
1: INTRODUCTION
|
|
1.1
|
Background Information
|
1
|
1.2
|
Problem Statement
|
4
|
1.3
|
Research Questions
|
5
|
1.4
|
Objectives of the Study
|
5
|
1.5
|
Justification
|
5
|
CHAPTER
2: REVIEW OF RELEVANT LITERATURES
|
|
2.1
|
Concept of Agricultural Extension
|
7
|
2.1.1
|
Extension definition
|
8
|
2.2
|
History of Extension Services
|
9
|
2.2.1
|
Agricultural extension service
|
9
|
2.2.2
|
Goals of extension service
|
10
|
2.2.3
|
Philosophy of extension
|
10
|
2.3
|
Extension Teaching Methods
|
11
|
2.4
|
Extension Teaching Aids
|
11
|
2.5
|
Typology of Extension Systems
|
12
|
2.6
|
Implementation of the Extension System in Nigeria
|
13
|
2.7
|
Principles of T&V System of Extension
|
14
|
2.8
|
Perspectives of Agricultural Extension in Nigeria
|
15
|
2.9
|
Challenges of Agricultural Extension in Nigeria
|
17
|
2.10
|
Redefining the Nigerian Agricultural Extension
System for Effective Agricultural Transformation
|
18
|
2.11
|
Agricultural Research Development
|
19
|
CHAPTER
3: METHODOLOGY
|
|
3.1
|
Study Area
|
21
|
3.2
|
Population of the Study
|
22
|
3.3
|
Data Collection
|
22
|
3.4
|
Data Analysis
|
22
|
CHAPTER
4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
|
|
4.1
|
Research Projects from 2000 – 2015
|
23
|
4.2
|
Gender Distribution of Students
|
23
|
4.3
|
Students Discipline
|
24
|
4.3.1
|
Undergraduate students research projects
|
24
|
4.3.2
|
Post graduate diploma (PGD) research projects
|
25
|
4.3.3
|
Master of science degree research projects
|
26
|
4.3.4
|
Doctoral degree research
|
27
|
CHAPTER
5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
|
|
5.1
|
Summary
|
29
|
5.2
|
Conclusion
|
30
|
5.3
|
Recommendations
|
30
|
|
References
|
32
|
|
Appendix
|
|
LIST OF TABLES
Tables
Pages
4.1
|
Distribution
of project students of Rural Sociology
and
Extension according to gender
|
24
|
4.2
|
Distribution
of Students’ Research according to their areas
|
25
|
4.3:
|
Distribution
of Post Graduate Diploma (PGD) students
based on their areas of specialization
|
26
|
4.4:
|
Distribution
of M.Sc. Research based on the students areas of specialization
|
27
|
4.5:
|
Distribution of Ph.D students Dissertation according to their research areas
of specialization
|
28
|
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
INFORMATION
Agriculture
is important to the Nigerian economy as it engages about 70% of the labour
force and contributes over 40% of the Gross Domestic product (GDP)
(FMARD,2010). It provides food for the teeming population and raw materials for
industries. The sector is faced with mirage of problems which militate against
optimizing its potential. Some of the constraints include low productivity,
poor marketing and distribution infrastructures, inadequate access to credit,
weak extension services and inadequate database among others. An attempt to
ameliorate the constraints by the Federal Government was the adoption of the
Agricultural Policy for Nigeria in 1988 (FMARD, 2000).
Agricultural extension is the application of scientific
research and new knowledge to agricultural practices through farmer education. The field of 'extension'
now encompasses a wider range of communication and learning activities
organized for rural people by educators from different
disciplines, including agriculture, agricultural
marketing,
health, and business studies. Extension practitioners can be
found throughout the world, usually working for government agencies. They are
represented by several professional organizations, networks and extension
journals. Agricultural extension agencies in developing countries receive large amounts of support
from international
development organizations such as the World Bank and the Food
and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
The
crucial role of agricultural Extension (i.e. farmer education) in the social
and economic development of the nation cannot be over-emphasized. Never before
in Nigerian history has the necessity for educating and raising the productive
capacity of our farmers been of such importance as it is today (Adepo, Okwu and
Ibrahim, 2012). Increased agricultural productivity depends primarily upon the
acceptance of cultural and technological changes at the rural farm level.
Thus,
for Nigerian agriculture to improve, our farmers have no alternative but to
learn and adopt recommended scientific farming techniques in place of their
traditional practices. Perhaps, the slow development of Nigerian agriculture
can be attributed to the inability of the Nigerian farmers to respond
positively to new ideas or innovations. For farmers to respond positively to
new ideas, they must be properly educated on how best to apply the new ideas or
practices to their farming activities (Ogunsumi and Abegunde, 2011; Nwachukwu,
2014). This is because the new ideas are often complex, technical and can
hardly be understood by most of our farmers. Nigeria cannot achieve increased
agricultural productivity on rural farm level, except through the provision of
basic agricultural education, particularly, the non-formal or extension type
that will help move millions of the farmers from traditional to progressive
farming, thereby improving the overall quality of rural life. It is not very
easy to define agricultural extension in a short concise, phrase or statement.
Any attempt to define it properly would involve lengthy explanation of several
principles and philosophies.
However,
different authorities and experts have defined extension in different forms and
ways, all ending on the improvement of the standard of living of the people.
Fisher (1983) defined extension as a system of education extending beyond the
classroom to individuals on the farms and is available to every member of the
family. Fisher, thus, analyzed extension in terms of family approach system
whereby all members of the family are taking into consideration in planning
extension programme. Vanden Ban and Hawkin (1988), defined extension as
involving the conscious use of communication of information to help people form sound
opinions and make good decisions. They explained extension systematically as a
process which helps farmers to analyze their present and expected future situations,
helps farmers to become aware of the problems, which can arise in such an
analysis, increase knowledge and develops into problems and helps to structure
farmers’ existing knowledge, helps farmers to acquire specific knowledge
related to certain problems, solutions and their consequences so that they can
act on possible alternatives, helps farmers to evaluate and improve their own
opinion-forming and decision-making skills.
Asiabaka
(2002) tried to look at Extension from modern perspective and thus, explained
it from the aim, which extension seek to accomplish; which is to teach both the
rural and urban clientele how to determine their problems and be able to rise
to such problems using their own resources. He further explained Extension as
having three important dimensions namely; educational component, which involves
changing the behavior complex and attitude of the people, economicdimension,
which includes; increased income of the clientele, increased crop yield, better
financial management, better methods of food preservation, social dimension,
which also includes; improved health of the clientele, leadership development,
better grooming, development co-oper ation,
increased zeal for development.
The
Department of Rural Sociology and Extension (RSE)came into existence since
inception of Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike (MOUAU). It has
continued to organize and conduct researches both at the undergraduate and post
graduate levels. This study therefore, was to analyze the research output of
the Department.
1.2 PROBLEM
STATEMENT
The Department of Rural Sociology and Extension
(RSE) is one of the Department in the College of Agricultural Economics, Rural
Sociology and Extension (CAERSE) of Michael Okpara University of Agriculture,
Umudike. Established in 1993/1994 under the administrative control of the Federal
(now Michael Okpara) University of Agriculture, Umudike (MOUAU) and guided by
the philosophy of Training for Helping
People to Help Themselves, the Department addresses a three-pronged mission
of; (MOUAU, 2010)
i.
Promoting and emphasizing
teaching, research and extension of knowledge
ii.
Offering to the general public,
the results of teaching and research, and fostering the practical application
of such research results
iii.
Establishing institutional
linkages in order to facilitate collaboration and integration of training,
research and extension activities, as well as community development activities,
particularly through outreach programme for technology transfer.
Over the years, a lot of
researches have been carried out in the Department of Rural Sociology and Extension,
Michael Okpara University of Agriculture Umudike. However, in spite of the numerous achievement
of the Department, there is no research, to the knowledge of the researcher
that has been done to ascertain number, gender segregation and the disciplines
of the researches carried out in the department within the period under study.
1.3 RESEARCH
QUESTIONS
The study will seek to provide answers to the
following research questions;
i.
What are the students’ research
works presented to the Department of RSE for the award of degrees between the
year 2000 and 2015 in MOUAU?
ii.
What is the gender segregation of
the students who presented research works for the award of degrees in RSE in
MOUAU?
iii.
What are the research topics by areas
of specialization in RSE?
1.4 OBJECTIVES OF
THE STUDY
The broad objective of this study was to analyzestudents’
agricultural research works presented in the Department of Rural Sociology and
Extension for the award of degrees in Michael Okpara University of Agriculture,
Umudike.
The specific objectives were to;
i.
identify all The research works
presentedin the Department of RSE from 2000- 2015 for the award of degrees in
RSE, MOUAU;
ii.
examine the gender segregation of
the students who presented research works for the award of degrees in the
Department;
iii.
analyzethe research topics by areas
of specialization in the Department.
1.5 JUSTIFICATION
This study will be of immense value to the Department
of Rural Sociology and Extension, the students carrying out research and the
entire University.
ü To the
Department of Rural Sociology and Extension, it will serve as a document of
achievement and record keeping.
ü To the
subsequent students, this study will guide them as reference materials, library
as well as guide them against plagiarism.
ü To the
University community, this work will promote their efforts in research and
human development.
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment