• 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00003473

No of Pages: 89

No of Chapters: 5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :



The study examined the influence of youth culture on the social orientation of adolescents in University of Lagos, Akoka Lagos.

The descriptive research survey was employed to assess the opinions of the respondents. A total of 120 (one hundred and twenty) students were sampled for this study.

Four null hypotheses were formulated and tested using the t-test and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) at 0.05 level of significance.

At the end of the analyses, the following conclusions were reached: Hypothesis one found that there is a significant influence of perceived youth culture on social orientation of undergraduates at University of Lagos; Hypothesis two found that there is a significant gender impact in youth culture on social orientation of adolescents in schools; Hypothesis three found that there is a significant class difference in perceived youth cultural impact on social orientation of undergraduates and finally finally, hypothesis four found that there is a significant effect of perceived youth cultural impact on social orientation of undergraduates living in the hostels and those who do not live in the hostels.

Based on the conclusions arrived at, at the end of this study, the following recommendations were made as possible solutions to the problem of perceived low social orientation of youths in the school and outside of it:

Youths should exhibit proper attitude to their cultural heritage. They should also understand that for them to be able to uphold good or higher social orientation, they would do well to possess high or healthy self-concept which is a positive way of how an individual sees himself/herself. It is recommended that youths should possess high and healthy self-concept in order to do well in life.

Both male and female students should inculcate their cultural values and norms that are required in the society. They should not try to uphold those norms and values that are inimical to the cultural heritage in a normal and decent society. Male and female youths of the society should know that they are the leaders of tomorrow, and as such, they should keep to the cultures and behaviours that are accepted in their community, rather than behaving unseemingly and irrationally, which is not a healthy attribute of a good society. Male and female youths should socialize correctly, doing it with decorum and maturity. They should shun acts and behaviours that can make them to be seen as delinquents and indisciplined in the society.


Title page                                                                                                                   i

Certification                                                                                                              ii

Dedication                                                                                                                 iii

Acknowledgements                                                                                                 iv

Abstract                                                                                                                     v

Table of contents                                                                                                     vii


CHAPTER ONE                                                                                                        1

1.0       Introduction                                                                                                  1

1.1       Theoretical Background                                                                             4

1.2       Statement of the Problem                                                                            11

1.3       Purpose of Study                                                                                          12

1.4       Research Questions                            13

1.5       Research Hypotheses                                                                                  13

1.6       Significance of Study                                                                                  14

1.7       Delimitation of the Study                                                                           15

1.8       Definition of Terms                                   15



CHAPTER TWO:      Literature Review                                                                17

Concept and Nature of Culture                                                                  18

Characteristics of Culture                                                                           22

Concept of Youth Culture                                                                          25

Concept of and Nature of Social Behaviour and Social Interaction    29

Peer Group as an Agent of Socialization                                                  33

Gender and Cultural Differentiation Among Youths                             38

Social Orientation: Problems Behaviour and Motivation                    

Towards Interpersonal Problem Solving Among Adolescents                          42

Adolescent in the School Environment: Relationship with Peers,

School Authority and Others                                                                     46

Common Mistakes in the Management of Adolescents                         49

CHAPTER THREE:  Research Methodology                                                       53

3.0       Introduction                                                                                                  53

3.1       Research Design                                                                                           53

3.2       Population of the Study                                                                              53

Sampling Technique                                                                                                53

Sample Size                                                                                                   54

3.5       Instrumentation                                                                                            54

3.6       Validity of Instrument                                                                                 55

3.7       Reliability of Instrument                                                                             55

3.8       Procedure for Data Collection                                                                   56

3.9       Data Analysis Method                                                                                 57


CHAPTER FOUR:    Data Analysis, Hypothesis Testing and

Interpretation of Results     58

Introduction                                                                                                  58

Hypothesis  Testing and Interpretation of Results                                  58

4.3       Summary of Findings                                                                                  63


CHAPTER FIVE:      Discussion of Findings, Summary of the Study, Conclusion, Recommendations and Suggestions for Further Studies          65

Introduction                                                                                                  65

Discussion of Findings                                                                                65

Summary of the Study                                                                                 70

Conclusions                                                                                                  71

Recommendations                                                                                       72

References                                                                                                    75

Appendix                                                                                                       80




The study of every unit of social organization must eventually lead to an analysis of the interaction of its elements. According to Rummer (1996) social interactions are the acts, actions, or practices of two or more people mutually oriented towards each other’s selves, that is, any behaviour that tries to affect or take account of each other’s subjective experiences or intentions. This means that the parties to the social interaction must be aware of each other, have each other’s self in mind as in the case of the adolescents of the youths culture group under study.

Generally, the adolescents in our institutions of learning interacts and are influenced by various aspects of life such as dressing – same clothing styles, same hair-do, diet, friends, sexual behaviour, use of same slang expression, entertainment and attitude towards authority figures and academic pursuits. The youth may be single sex, mixed group of young people who are usually bound together by same emotion such as a group is commonly found within a school, youth club, church or mosque.

In each case the adolescent encounters his mates and social interactions ensue immediately. Members of the youth culture, have strong feelings of friendship for one another and help provide opportunity to develop social skill that will help the youth make social, emotional and personal adjustment.

Moreover, social interaction requires mutual orientation. Therefore, peer acceptance is very fundamental and crucial at this stage as attested to by Osarenren (2005). She said, adolescents who are liked and accepted (star) by their peers are more likely to be psychologically healthier and self confident than those rejected (isolate) by their peers. This is in agreement with Nwadinigwe (2004) who opines that when the adolescent is not able to relate well, he becomes withdrawn, feels rejected, depressed and frustrated. He further added that his level of concentration in school, motivation to learn and performance in subjects invariably becomes negatively affected.

When this type of situation arises, Osarenren (2005) asserts that it is worthwhile for an older adult, preferably an understanding elder, counsellor, parent or teacher to intervene. The interaction may lead to the beginning of a more constructive interpersonal relationship for a rejected adolescent. But, Sokan and Akinade (1994) opined that the generation gap syndrome often causes conflicts between parents/adult differences, there is bound to be incongruence in views, beliefs and even attitudes.

According to Anusiem (1987), some observers pointed out that youth of today are more rebellious, more troubled emotionally more promiscuous sexually, less idealistic, more critical of values and standards of the adult culture (hence the so-called generation gap), more disengaged from these values than in order times. These observers also cite demonstrations and strikes, riots in university campuses and other institutions of higher learning, so-called lack of respect for constituted authorities, increased use of drugs, confrontation with police and law enforcement agents, increase rate of pregnancy among school girls, drop-outs from schools and so on and emphasize that we are in troubled times.

It is against this background that Siann and Ugwuegbu, in Anusiem (1987) argue that where society places excessive demands on adolescents, where it supplies no clear expectations of the future, and where society is changing so rapidly that the adolescent has no one to model himself on, adolescence may on occasion be a period of storm and stress’, not because adolescents are by nature emotionally unstable but because too much is being demanded of them.

On this note, the need to understand and appreciate the youths as they relates with themselves is pertinent even as they undergo ‘The crisis period’ according to Osarenren (2005) which are exhibited in different forms of worries and concern such as identity formation, development of moral and values and quest for independence amongst others. Hence, the youth often times relating and depending on his peers who are facing similar problems and who are therefore sympathetic.

Hurlock (1993), views socialization as a process of learning to conform to group standards, mores, and customs. It is a learning process which renders a person able to participate satisfactorily in a social group or society. Therefore, social orientation explores how comfortable the youth is when dealing with a lot of people on a regular basis.

Hence, to Nwadinigwe (2004) when an individual receives proper socialization, he adjusts easily in the society. This study is therefore interested in investigating how the perceived youth culture influences the social orientation of undergraduates in University of Lagos.

1.1       Theoretical Background      

Several theories explain what influences social orientation of youths in our institutions of learning and the society at large. Some of these theories will offer the theoretical basis of this study.

They include: consensus, conflict and interactionist theories of youth culture and symbolic interaction and social influence theories as related to the youths social orientation.

The symbolic-interaction theory by Mead (1990) assumes that social interaction can best be understood by studying humans, because people evidently possess the ability to think, reason and plan, which is not possessed by other animals. Thus, the theory calls attention to cognitive processes and therefore has a psychological base. The approach is likewise very sociological in that one of its major concerns is to understand the cooperative dimensions of human social behaviour, which was the essence of society.

The theory further suggests that people mentally explore the possible reactions of others to specific behaviours and uses this information to decide how to act toward other people. However, the self is a central concept here. People can interact with themselves just as they do, with others. This explains why we have the ‘crowd’ and ‘gang’ amongst the youth whose function according to Nwachukwu (1993) is its provision of a group identity for the individual adolescents – the ‘we’ feeling which separates him/her from the parents of the family.

Social influence theory – The Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) according to Aaron (1994) proposes that human behaviour is influenced by two factors:

attitudes towards the behaviour

the influence of social environment and general subjective norms on the behaviour.

Social norms are determined by examples that significant others set for us and by the attitudes they convey to us.

However, according to Lewin in Turner (1991), group decision studies once showed how difficult it is to change individuals behaviour in isolation from the norms they share as group members. He further said that we develop attitudes toward behaviour and understand social, norms through learning.

Social influence or interaction between people who are related to each other psychologically as members of positive reference groups or culture gives rise to shared social norms in relevant areas.

Early studies in youth culture were mainly produced by functionalist sociologists, and focus on youth as a single form of culture. In explaining the development of the culture, they utilized the concept of anomie. Parsons (1994) argued that as we move from one pattern of behaviour to another (from the family to work, for example) the concept of ‘anomie’ comes into play. He further added that though the family group is the primary unit of socialization in the society, the behaviour learnt within the family group is unlikely to be considered appropriate in other social groups (such as education or work). This is because the values and norms we learn during childhood within the family are not totally appropriate to the norms we need to display in later life in other institutions. And this brings about an “anomic situation” – feelings of unhappiness, isolation, loneliness and uncertainties.

Hence, to avoid to some extent the anomic situation, there is good evidence that youth in the process of interacting, from and conform to social norms and goals of the group (Turner, 1991).

Conflict (Marxist-type) theories of youth culture generally see human behaviour in terms of the various ways in which the structure of people’s relationships broadly conditions the way they behave, writers in this perspective tend to focus on the complex nature of individual/social group responses to the social environment in which they live (Adamson, 2000).

The theory propounded by Allium (2001), tend to focus attention on categories such as social classes (upper, middle and lower working class) and possibly more importantly class-fractions rather than “Youth as a whole”.

In this respect an individuals position in a system of social stratification affects, how they experience the social world and the benefits they develop about the nature of the social world and their relative prospects.

It could be seen from the above that Marxist perspectives on youth sub-cultures develop around the need to explain how and why different social groups (abbeit predominantly male and working class groups) respond to the structural pressures that surround them (Almond, 1997).

To achieve this theoretical explanation, two levels of analysis are frequently used

firstly, a macro level that seeks to understand the social structural pressures (economic, political and ideological) that surround and act on our choices of behaviour.

secondly, a micro level that seeks to understand the various ways that different groups respond to these pressures.

In analysing this second level, Mc Robbie and Garber (1995) writing about female teenage subcultures attempted to explain why these female subcultures are expressed differently to male subcultures. The behaviour of teenage girls in society is more closely controlled by parents. Also young girls are far more likely than young boys to attract negative labelling for their behaviour.

On the issue of class by Marxist, it should be noted herein, that youths in the undergraduate level are seen identifying with those who are popular academically or materially. To this, Eaton (1990) in a study found that student who were popular with their peers tended to be more successful in school work than those who were rejected by them. He also discovered that there was a stronger relationship between achievement in school and peer acceptance, than between achievement in other school activities and peer acceptance.

However, Coleman (1991) in an earlier study had results that were not consistent with Eaton’s. The former found that boys valued athletic status while girls valued popularity and leadership in extra class activities more than scholastic achievement.

Hence, like class, gender is not simply a social category but relative and relational: women and men as social groups are defined in terms of each other.

Lastly, the Interactionist Theory of Youth Culture. One of the most significant concepts in interactionist approach and analyses of deviance is that in order for behaviour to be seen as deviant, there must be some form of publicly-stated response.

Cohen (1994) argues that what is significant about youth subcultures is not that they are either functionally necessary or indicative of attempts by powerless youths to resist ‘hegemony’. Rather his basic argument is that youth subculture are effectively created, maintained and killed off by the mass media. He further argues that sociological attempts to explain youth cultures or subcultures in terms of structural pressures forcing a reaction amongst misconceived, since such attempts fail to recognise that youth cultures are not social groupings that arise “spontaneously” as a reaction to social forces.

The crucial variable involved here is that of the mass media as a form of social reaction. The media in effect, provide an ideological framework which gives meaning to the behaviour of people that prior to the labelling process, may not have had any coherent meaning like the popularisation of a spectacular subculture such as the Hippy movement in the 1960’s. This was also confirmed in Cohen’s (1994) classic study where he illustrated the idea of media involvement in the manufacture of spectacular youth subcultures in numerous ways, the most striking being his analysis of the relationship between “mods” and “rockern”. These two groups, he argues came to see themselves as being implacably and violently opposed through numerous media references to their opposition. This could be likened to the present ‘Area Boys’ or ‘OPC’ in Nigeria today.

However, it was noted by Ross Farelly (internet) that modern electronic media allow children and youth to live in a socially isolated, individualised world which is entirely a creation of the youth culture itself.

Statement of the Problem

There are many problems associated with the youths who are found both in the post primary schools and tertiary institutions. The problems ranges from indecent dressing, emulating negative peer attitude, cheating, disobedience, promiscuity, drug abuse, use and addiction etc.

According to Onyeuke (2002) adolescents in tertiary institutions adopt some cultures that are inimical to the ones acceptable in the society or community. Belonging to secret cults, challenging the laid down rules and regulations of the school authority, smoking and general indisciplinary behaviour, characterize the youths at school. According to him, this is as a result of borrowed culture by the youths. A situation where the adolescent discards the cultural values and norms with which he/she was brought up and cleaves to another culture and negative ways of behaviour due to the negative influence of peer pressure and all in the name of ‘civilization’.

The negative attitude of youths is a problem because if it is not checked by the relevant authorities at home in school and the society at large, it could pose a great danger in the immediate society and the future generation.

Purpose of Study

The major reason for this study is to investigate the influence of perceived youth culture on the social orientation of undergraduates.

Specifically the study intends to find out whether the youth culture influences their social orientation.

Gender in the perceived youth culture influences social orientation.

Class/status of students in the perceived youth culture influences their social orientation.

Environment of students affects their social orientation.

Research Questions

The study will be guided by the following research questions:

To what extent does the perceived youth culture influences social orientation of adolescents.

To what extent does the sex of students in the perceived youth culture affects their social orientation.

To what extent does the class difference of students in the perceived youth culture affects their social orientation.

To what extent does the environment of the youth influences their social orientation.

Research Hypotheses

There is no significant influence of perceived youth culture on social orientation of undergraduates.

There is no significant gender impact in the perceived youth culture on the social orientation of undergraduates.

There is no significant class difference of the perceived youth culture on social orientation of undergraduates.

There is no significant effect of the perceived youth culture on the social orientation of undergraduates living in the hostel and those who are not.

Significance of Study

The study would be of general importance to the researcher in that it would help to indeed confirm if the perceived youth culture of undergraduates of University of Lagos influences their social orientation. Also it will make parents to find ways of strengthening their families to avoid family instability which most times drive the young adult to the youth culture.

Furthermore, the study will enable the Government to become aware of some of the issues emanating from the youths and their social orientation and then develop policies that will possibly,

Promote education of cultural diversity by reviving, textbooks, reshaping curricular and intercultural teacher training, music and so on.

Ensure the education of language – declaring indigenous languages as official national languages as declared in New Zealand (where Maori was declared the official language – UNESCO, 2002). This is to restore the indigenous cultures.

In all, this study is of importance to school personnel such as psychologists, guidance counsellors and a host of others associated with the total growth of the students.

Delimitation of the Study  

The study is limited to the influence of perceived youth culture on social orientation of under-graduates in University of Lagos.

It investigated the characteristics of the youth culture which includes unconventional dress pattern, rejection of traditional attitude towards work and study, uses of slangs and mass media which invariably influences the social orientation of the youths.

Definition of Terms

Youth: The condition of being young. The period of life from puberty to the attainment of full growth, adolescence. 

Culture: The sum total of ways of living built up by a group of people and transmitted from one generation to another.

Youth Culture: Generally refers to the ways adolescents and teenagers differentiate themselves from the parent culture of their community.

Social: This is living or disposed to live, in companionship with others in a community, rather than in isolation.

Orientation: This is an adaptive service. The ability to locate oneself in one’s environment.

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on, the management of has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews


No Review Found.

To Review

To Comment