SCREEN OF SPUTUM SAMPLES FROM PATIENTS ATTENDING PUBLIC HOSPITALS IN ABIA STATE FOR EXTENDED SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE PRODUCING KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00007082

No of Pages: 58

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦3000

  • $

ABSTRACT

The aim of the study was to detect extended spectrum B-lactamase (ESBL) in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from patients’ sputum attending public hospitals in Abia State. A total of 64 sputum specimens were collected from public hospitals in Abia State, majorly; Federal Medical Centre, Umuahia, Abia State Specialist Hospital, Umuahia and Seventh Day Adventists Hospital, Aba between the period of June and September 2017. Bacteriological tests of sputum specimens were performed for Klebsiella pneumoniae including inoculation on MacConkey agar and blood agar. The identity of the isolates was confirmed by biochemical tests. Out of 64 sputum specimens, 21 (32%) Klebsiella pneumoniae were recovered from patients’ sputum.  Susceptibility test were carried out for each Isolate and samples 14, 55, 58 and 63 had highest susceptibility and Ceftazidime (CAZ 30µg), gentamicin (GEN 10µg), Ofloxacin (OFL 5µg)  Nitrofurantoin (NIT 300µg) and Aztreonam (ATM 30µg) shows the highest susceptibility pattern. While Ciprofloxacin (CPR 5µg), Augumentin (AUG 30µg) and Ceftriaxone (30µg) showed the lowest susceptibility pattern. Screening tests for ESBLs were performed against the 21 Isolates and 15 were sensitive while 6 were resistant. Double-disc synergy test (DDST) was done for this 15 isolates and 9 were positive and 6 were negative. This study showed that Klesiella pneumoniae is considered to be one of ESBLs producers.







TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Title page                                                                                                                                i

Certification                                                                                                                            ii

Dedication                                                                                                                              iii

Acknowledgements                                                                                                                iv

Table of Contents                                                                                                                   v

List of Tables                                                                                                                          vi

List of Figures                                                                                                                         viii

Abstract                                                                                                                                  ix

 

Chapter One

1.0 Introduction                                                                                                                      1

1.1 Statement of the Problem                                                                                                 4

1.2 Aim of the Study                                                                                                              5

1.3 Objective of the Study                                                                                                     5

 

Chapter Two

Literature Review

2.0 History                                                                                                                              6

2.1 Clinical Significance                                                                                                         6

2.2   Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanism in Klebsiella Species                                           7

2.3 Beta-Lactam (Β-Lactam) Antibiotics                                                                               7

2.3.1 Structure                                                                                                                        7

2.3.2 Mechanism of Action                                                                                                    10

2.4 Overview of Beta-Lactamases                                                                                          10

2.4.1 Synthesis, Location and Mode of Transfer of Beta-Lactamases                                   12

2.4.2 Classification of Beta-Lactamases                                                                                 12

2.4.2.1 Functional Classification of Beta-Lactamases                                                            12

2.4.2.2 Molecular Classification                                                                                             14

2.5  Βeta-Lactamase Active Site and Hydrolytic Mechanisms                                              17

2.5.1 Serine Β-Lactamases (Ser-Β-Lactamase)                                                                       17

2.5.1.1 Mechanism of Hydrolysis of Ser-Β-Lactamases                                                        19

2.5.1.2 Β-Lactamase Inhibitors and Pathway of Inhibition by Clavulanic Acid                   21

2.6 Definition of Extended-Spectrum B–Lactamases (Esbls)                                                23

2.7 Diversity of ESBLS Types                                                                                               24

2.7.1 SHV                                                                                                                               24

2.7.2 TEM                                                                                                                               25

2.7.3 CTX-M                                                                                                                          26

2.7.4 OXA                                                                                                                              26

2.8 Epidemiology of ESBLS                                                                                                  27

 

 

 

Chapter Three

3.0 Materials and Methods                                                                                                     28

3.1 Study Area                                                                                                                      28 3.2 Collection of Specimen                                                                                                         28 3.3 Sterilization Method                                                                                                    28

3.4 Isolation and Identification of Bacteria from Patients                                                     28

3.4.1    Colony Purification                                                                                                     29

3.4.2    Gram Staining                                                                                                             29

3.4.3 Motility Test                                                                                                                  29

3.4.4 Wet Mount Preparation                                                                                                 30

3.5 Biochemical Test                                                                                                               30

3.5.1 Catalase Reaction                                                                                                          30

3.5.2 Citrate Test                                                                                                                    30

3.5.3 Oxidase Test                                                                                                                  31

3.5.4 Methyl red test                                                                                                               31

3.5.5  Indole test                                                                                                                     31

3.5.6  Urease test                                                                                                                    32

3.6 In-Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test                                                                       32

3.7 ESBL Detection                                                                                                               32

 

Chapter Four

Result

4.0 Result                                                                                                                                34

 

Chapter Five

Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation

5.1 Discussion                                                                                                                         40

5.2 Conclusion                                                                                                                        41

5.3 Recommendation                                                                                                              41

 References                                                                                                                             42

Appendix I                                                                                                                              47

Appendix II                                                                                                                            48

Appendix III                                                                                                                           49

Appendix IV                                                                                                                           50

 

 

 

 


 

LIST OF TABLES

 

Table

Title

Page

2.1

Classification scheme for beta-lactam antibiotics, based on chemical structure

9

2.2

Evolution of functional classification of beta-lactamases

15

2.3

Tabular Representative of Functional And molecular Characteristics of the Major Groups of β-Lactamases

16

2.4

Conserved motifs (elements) in the active site of Ser-β-lactamases

18

4.1

Incidence and percentage occurrence of the K. pneumoniae in sputum samples

35

4.2

Identification and Characterization of Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolate

36

4.3

Antibiotics susceptibility pattern of the isolated Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates from the sputum samples

37

4.4

Screening for ESBLs on CLSI breakpoint

38

4.5

Confirmation of ESBLs among the K. pneumoniae Isolates based on the Double disc synergy text (DDST)

39

 






LIST OF FIGURES


Figure

Title

Page

2.1

Action of Ser- β-lactamases (Matagne et al., 1998)

20

2.2

Mechanism of action of clavulanate and amoxicillin

22

2.3

Representation of the general mechanism of action of irreversible inhibitors.

(I= Inhibitor; E= Enzymes)

22


 









CHAPTER ONE


1.0       INTRODUCTION

Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. Pneumoniae) is a member of family Enterobacteriaceae.  The organism can produce infection at a variety of sites with the risk of being increased in patients with impaired host defences (e.g. Diabetes mellitus, alcoholism, malignancy, chronic obstruction pulmonary disease and glucorticoid therapy). The introduction of the third generation cephalosporins (3 GC) was very much helpful in fighting against the beta- lactamases in clinical practice (Paterson and Bonomo, 2005). However, resistance to these antibiotics started to emerge rapidly. Because of their increased spectrum of activity, especially against 3GC, these enzymes were called extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) (Bradford, 2001).


These enzymes are produced by Enbterobacteriaceae mainly by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and K. oxytoca. They have been detected in other Gram-negative bacilli such as Proteus species, Salmonella species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other Enteobacteriaceae. The first ESBL-producing organism was isolated in Germany in 1983. Thereafter, such organisms were reported in the USA following outbreaks of infections caused by these pathogens. The ESBL enzymes are capable of hydrolyzing broad spectrum cephalosporins and monobactams but inactive against cephamycins and imipenem. In addition, ESBL producing organisms exhibit co-resistance to many other classes of antibiotics resulting in the limitation of therapeutic option (Astal, et al., 2004).


For this reason, the significance of such ESBL–mediated infections has been increasingly reported worldwide. The ESBL have serine at their active site and attack the amide bond in the lactam ring of antibiotics causing their hydrolysis. Because of inoculum effect and substrate specificity, their detection is a major challenge. Two indicators of ESBL are eight- fold reductionsin  MIC  and  potentiation  of  the  inhibitor  zone  of  third  generation cephalosporin in the presence of clavulanic acid. For this reason, detection of ESBL, using conventional antimicrobial susceptibility methods and delay in the recognition and reporting of ESBL production by Gram negative bacilli is associated with prolonged hospital stay, increase morbidity, mortality and health care expenses. So, it becomes necessary to know the prevalence of these organisms and to formulate the treatment policy (Mehrgan and Rahbar,2008).


The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) recommended that microbiology laboratories reported ESBL-producing isolates of E. coli and Klebsiella species are  resistant  to  all  penicillins,  cephalosporins  (including  cefepime),  and  aztreonam, irrespective of their individual in vitro test results. The presence of ESBL in some K. pneumoniae and E. coli strains poses an important challenge in clinical practice, since these organisms are common causes of serious infections (Mehrgan and Rahbar, 2008).


Klebsiella is  ubiquitous  in  nature,  in  human  they  colonize  the  skin,  pharynx  or  gastro intestinal tract (GIT), they may also colonize sterile wounds and urine, carriage rate varies with different studies. Klebsiella may be regarded as normal flora in many parts of colon, intestinal tract and in the biliary tract; oropharyngeal carriage has been associated with endothelial incubation, impaired host defences and antimicrobial use. K. Pneumoniae and K. oxytoca are the 2 members of the genus responsible for the most human infections. They are opportunistic pathogens found in the environment and in the mammalian mucosal surfaces. The principle pathogenic reservoirs of infection are the GIT of patient and the hands of personnel. Organisms can spread rapidly even leading to nosocomial outbreaks (Baron, et al., 1994).


Infection with Klebsiella organisms occur in the lung, where they cause destruction changes, necrosis, inflammation and hemorrhage occur within lung tissue, sometimes producing thick, bloody, mucoid sputum described as currant jelly sputum. Pneumonia caused by Klebsiella is a necrotizing process with predilection for debilitated people; it has a high mortality rate with approximately 50% even with antimicrobial therapy. The mortality rate approaches 100% for person with alcoholism and bactremia. Klebsiella pneumoniae infection it causing inflammation of lung characterized by fever, chills, muscle stiffness, chest pain, cough and short of breath. Pneumonia may be caused by bacteria, virus or fungus and sometimes by physical and chemical irritants. It occurs in patients with allergic but young children and the elderly as well as immune compromised and immune defect patients are especially at risk. Septic patients may be at increased risk  for  acquiring  antimicrobial  resistant  pneumonia because of the prior exposure to various types of antibiotics, factors that is known to play an important  role in  the generating of antimicrobial  resistance.  The bacterial spectrum and antimicrobial resistance may vary temporarily and geographically; each institution must undertake its own local evaluation. Such an evaluation may also be useful to detect emerging trends of antimicrobial resistance (Wagenlehner, et al., 2008).


K. Pneumoniae are resistant to multiple antibiotics which is plasmid mediated propriety of K. Pneumoniae due to production of beta lactamase enzyme. Carbapenemase producing K. Pneumoniae is the recent addition to the pool of multi drug resistant nosocomial pathogen (Desphande, et al., 2006). Extensive use of broad spectrum antibiotic in hospitalized patients has led  to  both  increased  carriage  of  Klebsiella  and  subsequently  the  development  of multidrug resistant strains that produce extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL). These strains are highly virulent show capsular type K55, and have an extraordinary ability to spread. Most outbreaks are due to single clone or single gene. The bowel is the major site of colonization with infection of the urinary tract, respiratory tract and wounds. Bactremia and significant increased mortality have resulted from infection with these species. In addition to prior antibiotic use, risk factors for infection include the presence of an indwelling catheter, feeding tube or central venous catheter, poor health status and treatment in intensive care units or nursing home. Acquisition of these species has major problem in most hospital because of resistance of multiple antibiotic and potential transfer of plasmid to other organisms (Tortora, et al., 2004). Morbidity and mortality rate are comparable to those for other Gram-ve organisms that cause sepsis and septic shock. In neonatal units, outbreaks caused by ESPL producing strains present a more serious problem and may be associated with increased mortality (Tortora, et al., 2004).


ESBLs are beta-lactamases that hydrolyse expanded spectrum cephalosporin with an oxyimino side chain these include cefotaxime, ceftriaxone and ceftazidime as well as the oxyimino-monobactam (aztreonam).  The ESBLs confer resistant to these antibiotics and related oxyimino-beta lactams. Typically, they derived from genes for TEM-1, TEM-2 or SHV-1 by mutations that alter the amino acid configuration around the active site of these beta lactamases. This extends the spectrum of β.lactam antibiotics susceptible to hydrolysis by these enzymes. An increasing number of ESBLs not of TEM or SHV lineage has recently been described. The ESBLs are frequently plasmid encoded (Emery and Weymouth, 1997). Carbapenems are the treatment of choice for serious infections due to ESBL producing organisms, yet carbapenem resistant isolates have recently been reported. ESBL producing organisms may appear susceptible to some extended spectrum cephalosporins. However, treatment with such antibiotic has been associated with high failure rates (Paterson, et al., 2003).


1.1       STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae have become a serious health concern all over the world. This is due to the indiscriminate use of antibiotics, poor sanitation in hospitals and unhealthy life styles. Evidences of outbreaks and spread are well documented. Unfortunately, no information or data about the incidence or otherwise is available in Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike despite the fact that it is a significant health problem even in the developed world.

 

1.2       AIM OF THE STUDY

The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence of beta-lactamase including extended spectrum beta-lactamase in Klebsiella pneumoniae screened from sputum samples from patients in public hospitals, Abia State.


1.3       OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

                     To screen Klebsiella pneumoniae from patients’ sputum samples attending public hospitals in Abia State.

                     To determine the pattern of antibiotics susceptibility of the isolates.

                     To determine the prevalence of extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBLs) in sputum samples of patients attending public hospitals in Abia State.

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment