PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE OF THREE CHICKEN STRAINS IN THE HUMID TROPICS

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00009333

No of Pages: 131

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦5000

  • $

ABSTRACT

 

This experiment evaluated the production performance of three chicken strains in the humid tropics. Three hundred (300) day-old chicks, 100 each of Arbor Acre broiler (AAB), Noiler hybrid (NOH) and Yoruba ecotype chicken (YEC) were randomly replicated five (5) times with 20 birds per replicate in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD). Measurements were done in two phases 0-8 and 10-16 weeks. Body weight(BWT) and linear body parameters; body length(BL),keel length(KL),breast width(BWD),drumstick length(DL) shank length(SL), wing length(WL),body depth(BD) were measured fortnightly. Average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily weight gain (ADWG), feed conversion ratio (FCR) and percentage mortality, carcass cut-parts and internal organ proportions were evaluated. Data obtained were analyzed using the SAS (2011) package for analysis of variance procedures and significant means separated using Duncan’s multiple Range Test.  Phenotypic correlations of body weight and linear body traits, live weight and carcass traits, as well as correlations among linear traits and repeatability estimates for weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 were also done. Results obtained showed significant strain (P <0.05) effects for  Arbor Acre broiler over  other strains in final body weight at 16 weeks of age, Arbor Acre broiler (AAB) maintained strain superiority (P<0.05) in almost all the performance traits evaluated, average daily weight gain: AAB (35.24), NOH (6.24) and YEC (4.90), average daily feed intake: AAB (149.41), NOH (75.40) and YEC (68.79), feed conversion ratio: AAB (4.24), NOH (12.07) and YEC (13.82) except in percentage mortality where Noiler hybrid performed better (P<0.05) with 6% mortality. In carcass evaluation, Arbor Acre broiler maintained its superiority in both phases of (0-8) and (9-16) weeks of age, dressed percent: AAB (71.91%, 83.62%), NOH (53.96%, 78.36%), YEC (62.08%, 76.89%) and dressed weight: AAB (1131.67g, 3380.00g), NOH (600.00g, 1780.00g), YEC (460.00g, 1330.00g). Noiler hybrid and Yoruba ecotype strains performed better (P<0.05) in drumstick and wing. Yoruba Ecotype chicken had higher (P<0.05) shank length (6.57 cm) in week 9-16. Correlations between body weight and linear traits, live weight and carcass traits showed highly significant and positive associationsHigh to moderate associations were observed between live weight and internal organs in the Yoruba ecotype followed by the Arbor Acre broiler strain whereas low association was observed in the Noiler hybrid. Regression of body weight and linear body traits indicated that quadratic model produced better (P<0.05) coefficients of determinations (R2 %) for Arbor Acre with higher accuracy of prediction in 10-16 weeks of age.  Repeatability estimates of body parameters for 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks of age showed that both Arbor Acre and Noiler hybrid had the highest repeatability estimates of 71.33 ± 4.38 and 72.96 ± 4.38 for body length and drumstick respectively in the 16th week of age and Yoruba ecotype with the highest estimate of 99.99 ± 5.18 in the 12th week for drumstick. The results of this study revealed that AAB maintained superiority and showed significant values in body weight and linear body traits as well as other traits measured among the strains except for internal organ proportions where the Yoruba ecotype chicken maintained superiority. Noiler hybrid (NOH) and Yoruba ecotype chicken (YEC) have the potentials to be reared in humid tropics with improved management system.






TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                            

Title Page                       i                                                                                                                     

Certification                                                                               ii

Declaration                                                                                      iii

Dedication                                                                                        iv

Acknowledgement                                                                           v

List of Tables                                                                                vi

List of Figures                                                                                 vii

Abstract                                                                                      xi

 

CHAPTER 1:           INTRODUCTION

1.1       Background Information                                                            1

1.2       Statement of the Problem                                                               4

1.3       Objectives                                                                                 5

1.4       Justification                                                                             5

 

CHAPTER 2:             LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1       Definition of Poultry                                                                  7

2.1.1    History of domestic chickens                                                         9

2.1.2      Growth performance of indigenous chickens                                10

2.1.3    Carcass parts and organs of indigenous chickens               12

2.1.4    Body weight                                                                       13

2.1.5    Breed improvement                                                                    14

2.2       Morphometric Traits of Chicken                                                   16

2.2.1    Repeatability                                                                             17

2.2.2   Body weight prediction in poultry                                               19

2.3      Carcass characteristics of chicken                               22

2.4       Phenotypic Correlation                                                             23

2.4.1    Correlation between weight and linear traits in poultry                                   24

2.4.2    Genotype and linear body performance                                                         25

2.4.3    Body weight and linear body performance                                                    26

2.4.4    Breeds and Classification of Poultry Chicken                                                29

2.5       Development of  Broiler Breeds                                                                     33

2.6       Noiler  Hybrid                                                                                                35

2.7       Yoruba ecotype                                                                                              36      

                                                                                                 

CHAPTER 3:            MATERIALS AND METHODS

3.1       Experimental site                                                                                            37

3.2       Management of experimental birds                                                                37

3.3       Experimental procedure                                                                                 38

3.4       Parameters measured                                                                                      39

3.4.1    Growth performance traits                                                                             39

3.4.2    Growth parameters                                                                                         39

3.5       Carcass traits                                                                                                  40

3.6       Experimental designs and statistical analysis                                                 41

3.7       Estimation of phenotypic correlations                                                           42

 

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                                                      45

 

 

CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION           

5.1       Conclusion                                                                                                      94

5.2       Recommendations                                                                                          95

            REFERENCES                                                                                              96

           APPENDICES                                                                                                111


 








 

  LISTS OF TABLES


2.1:      Production characteristics of indigenous scavenging chicken in

sub-saharan Africa                                                                              12

 

2.2:      Organ weights and carcass composition of local chickens at different

ages in a tropical country of Africa                                                    13

 

2.3:      Flock size and Poultry farming objectives in Nigeria                        15

2.4:      Efficiency of strategies for improving poultry production                 16

2.5:      Performance of the broilers from 1923 to 2001                                          35

3.1:      Composition of experimental diets                                                     38

4.1       Growth performance of Arbor Acre Broiler, Noiler hybrid and Yoruba

ecotype chicken strains                                                                       46

4.2       Body weight and linear body measurement of Arbor Acre Broiler,

Noiler hybrid and Yoruba Ecotype chicken strains (Week 2-8)        51

 

4.3       Body weight and linear body measurement of Arbor Acre Broiler,

Noiler hybrid and Yoruba ecotype chicken strains (Week 9-16)       54

 

4.4       Carcass cut-parts of Arbor Acre Broiler, Noiler hybrid and Yoruba

ecotype chicken strains at 8 weeks                                                     57

 

4.5       Internal organ proportions of Arbor Acre Broiler, Noiler hybrid and

Yoruba ecotype chicken strains at 16 weeks                                      60

4.6       Phenotypic correlations between body weight and linear traits in Arbor

Acre Broiler, Noiler hybrid and Yoruba ecotype chickens                63

4.7       Phenotypic correlations between live weight, dressed weight and carcass

cut parts                                                                                               66

4.8       Phenotypic correlations between live weight and internal organs                 69

4.9       Phenotypic correlations among linear traits (wks 2-8) in  Arbor Acre            74

4.10     Phenotypic correlations among linear traits (wks 10-16) in Arbor Acre            75

4.11     Phenotypic correlations among linear traits (wks 2-16) in Arbor Acre            76

4.12     Phenotypic correlations among linear traits (wks 2-8) in Noiler hybrid            77

4.13     Phenotypic correlations among linear traits (wks 10-16) in Noiler hybrid            78

4.14     Phenotypic correlations among linear traits (wks 2-16) in Noiler hybrid            79

4.15     Phenotypic correlations among linear traits (wks 2-8) in Yoruba Ecotype             80

4.16     Phenotypic correlations among linear traits (wks 10-16) in Yoruba

Ecotype                                                                                                           81

 

4.17     Phenotypic correlations among linear traits (wks 2-16) in Yoruba Ecotype           82

 

4.18     Linear and quadratic regression model for predicting body weight

in Broilers using Linear Parameters                                                               84

4.19     Linear and quadratic model for predicting body weight in Noiler hybrid

using linear  parameters                                                                                  86

 

4.20     Linear and quadratic model for predicting body weight in Yoruba

ecotype using linear parameters                                                                     88

 

4.21     Repeatability estimates (R+Se %) of Arbor Acre Broiler

at 4, 8, 12, 16  weeks of age                                                                                  91

 

4.22     Repeatability estimates (R+Se%) of Noiler hybrid

At 4, 8,12,16 weeks of age                                                                             92

4.23     Repeatability Estimates (R +Se%) of Yoruba

ecotype Chickens at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks                                                     93

 










 

LIST OF FIGURES

                                                

1          Body weight (g) of Arbor Acre Noiler and Yoruba ecotype from   weeks 2

to week 16                                                                                                       111

 

.2         Body length (cm) of Broiler, Noiler and Yoruba ecotype from weeks

2 to week 16                                                                                                    111

 

3          Keel lengths (cm) of Broiler, Noiler and Yoruba ecotype from weeks

2 to week 16                                                                                                    112

 

4          Drumstick lengths (cm) of Broiler, Noiler and Yoruba ecotype from weeks

2 to week 16                                                                                                    112

 

5          Shank lengths (cm) of Broiler, Noiler and Yoruba ecotype from weeks

2 to week 16                                                                                                    113

 

6          Wing lengths (cm) of Broiler, Noiler and Yoruba ecotype from weeks

2 to week 16                                                                                                    113

 

7          Breast lengths (cm) of Broiler, Noiler and Yoruba ecotype from weeks

2 to week 16                                                                                                    114

 

8          Body depths (cm) of  Arbor Acre Broiler, Noiler and Yoruba ecotype from

weeks 2 to week 16                                                                                         114


 






 

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION


            1.1           BACKGROUND INFORMATION

The livestock industry provides a means of livelihood for large number of populations (Hollis, 1993) thereby contributing significantly to the nutritional status of citizens of nations.  Chicken plays major role in promoting the rural economies contributing 92% and 74% of meat and eggs consumption (Nwanta et al., 2006; Sonaiya and Swan, 2004). Any form of food policy development does not exclude the realization of good nutritional status for the citizenry. Nutritional status is embedded in the concept of food security which implies “access by all people at all time to sufficient food for a healthy and productive life” (Ajakaiye and Akinbinu, 2000). Maxwell and Smith (1992) however assert that food security is not just a matter of quantity of food entitlement but also the quality of entitlement.  Food quality is often an undervalued issue in Nigeria, especially in the present situation where the  nation is struggling to feed a bloated population, growing at more than 3.0 percent per annum(NBS,2016;Akpabio and Essien,2007). However, according to Tollens (2000), the large number of people suffering from micronutrient deficiency-related diseases stress the importance of food quality. Food obtained from animals constitutes a crucial component in the chain of quality-protein production in terms of net protein utilization-an index of protein quality, calculated by multiplying protein digestibility by biological value. Animal protein is essential in human nutrition and foods derived from animal products are important sources of nutrients in the human diet and play an increasing role in the human nutrition (Givens, 2005). Consumer preference for tender and white meat necessitated increased broiler production. Chickens provide healthy meat and cheapest of all livestock meats. Poultry production has a less detrimental impact on the environment.   Chicken have a good potential for rapid growth, short gestation, high prolificacy, early maturing and high feed conversion efficiency (Hollis, 1993). Broiler production provides not only high quality animal proteins but generate quick returns on investment owing to its short generation interval and general acceptability (Olawumi and Fagbuaro,2011).Chicken eggs are rich in lutein which lowers the risk of cataracts and macular degeneration and calcium an essential, normal constituent of all living body cells for normal muscle contraction and blood clotting (Smith and Wiseman,2007;Sparks,2006). Aho (2002) reported that broiler production and processing technologies have become rapidly accessible and being implemented on a worldwide basis allowing for continuous expansion and competitiveness in the meat sector.  Tremendous genetic progress has been observed in growth rate and meat yield of broiler chicken since several decades ago (Havenstein et al., 1994; 2003). However, this evident progress in growth rate, and the consequent reduction in age needed to attain market weight under optimal conditions have not been accompanied by similar improvements under poor conditions in tropical environments.  The expansion and improvement of the Nigerian poultry industry has been one of the major focuses of the Federal government in order to improve the animal protein consumption of her citizenry (CBN, 2004). The Nigerian indigenous chicken has been seen or described as small bodied poor growth with poor feed conversion and poor meat types (Nwosu and Asuquo, 1985). This makes them a rallying- and- focal point for researchers and researches as 90% of the 150 million chickens in Nigerian are local varieties which contributes 90% and 72% of the  egg and meat (consumption) intake respectively (Nwanta et al., 2006). Breeder industries seems to be selecting against strains of broiler chickens with tendency to deposit fat by incorporating the local genotypes, whose conformation as well as meat yield is expected to be improved as a result of crossing. Crosses of local strains with exotic strains are necessary for preservation of local genetic resources, which according to IFAD (2011) are tendering towards extinction. The utilization of improved native breeds or its crosses has been found to result in suitable birds (Singh et al., 2003). Several reports on the characterization of the indigenous chickens showed that they could be classified based on the occurrences of some major genes such as Dwarf gene (DW), Naked Neck gene (Na) and Frizzling gene (Fr) (Ikeobi et al., 1996; Adebambo et al., 1999). Greater variations were also reported to exist among the chickens in growth and egg laying performance (Peters, 2000).With growing interest in quality breeding, leanness of carcass cuts and quality of broiler meat; monitoring changes in body weight and linear body parameters over time does not suffice for a broiler improvement programme without inclusion of carcass traits(Hyman,1954;Adebambo etal.,2012). Genetic progress in broiler industry is rated in measure of changes in body growth and carcass conformation. Genetic progress can be attained either by selection due to additive gene effects or cross breeding(dominance) based on knowledge of the size and nature of gene action and genetic control of related traits (Adebambo et al., 2012).  In addition, genomics research and the application of molecular genetics in the breeding programme can also contribute (Olori, 2008).

There are now even greater opportunities for controlling breeding programmes in poultry (Muir et al., 2008). A range of techniques has led to the mapping of genetic pathways that control growth, development and metabolism of chickens (Cogburn et al., 2003) and can even reveal which genes are active at particular points in development (Cogburn, et al., 2003). Marker assisted selection (MAS) using QTLs (Quantitative Trait loci) enables more efficient identification of birds with desirable characters and so speed up the process of selection.  The emphasis so far has been on traits associated with production such as growth rate (Pakdel et al., 2005; Gonzalez – Recio et al., 2009), carcass quality (Zheng et al., 2009) and egg production (Zhang, et al., 2008). According to Cahaner et al., (1992), Yalcin et al., (1997) the time needed to reach market weight is prolonged, as physiological and behavioural responses to high ambient temperature are inadequate and increase in body temperature occurs, causing a decrease in appetite (anorexia) and in actual growth rate, leading to lower efficiency and profitability of poultry meat production. These conditions negatively affect also the yield and quality of broiler breast meat (Cahaner et al., 1992; Sandercock et al., 2001 and Woelfel et al., 2002).The performance of broiler chickens is determined by its genotype and environmental factors (Boukwamp et al., 1973; Edward and Denman, 1975).


1.2       STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

 Noiler hybrid is an improved tropically adapted breed (iTAB) possessing appreciable level of immunity to endemic prevalent in the tropics and with dearth of information on its productivity whereas Yoruba ecotype are rarely reared in the humid regions. The manner of importation of high yielding stocks continues to increase tremendously with little or no knowledge of problems of acclimatization, disease and management procedure (Ayorinde, 1986), which is a major threat and concern to the indigenous germplasm. This has contributed negatively to research efforts towards the improvement of the local germplasm. Hence the prompt for evaluation of performance of Noiler hybrid, Yoruba ecotype chicken strains and Arbor Acre broiler in the humid tropics.


 

1.3       OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to determine:

      i.         body weight and linear body measurements of the three chicken strains.

     ii.         growth performance and the carcass traits of three strains of chicken (Noiler hybrid, Arbor Acre broiler, Yoruba ecotype).

  1. phenotypic correlations between body weights and linear body measurements; live weight and carcass cut parts as well as among linear body traits.
  2.  extent to which linear body measurements could be used to predict body weight of the three chicken strains using linear and quadratic regression models.
  3. Repeatability of body weight and linear body traits at week 4,8,12 and 16.

 

1.4       JUSTIFICATION

Dearth of adequate information on growth potentials of local and suitable exotic chicken genotypes in Nigeria undermines the effort to exploit and conserve them for increased productivity. According to Alemu and Dessie (1997), one of the ways of improving the productivity of indigenous chicken is through crossbreeding with exotic breeds as this widens the combining ability for production potential of exotic breeds with the adaptability of the indigenous breeds. The exploitation of genetically diverse stocks for improving economic traits is one of approaches in the breeding programmes of chickens. The combining ability analysis helps to identify desirable combiners that may be utilized to exploit heterosis (Mohammed et al., 2005). According to Berhe and Gous,(2008) that there is evidence of differences in the performance of chicken strains in different environments and management conditions. This study was thus carried out with the objectives of establishing detailed relationships between body weight and linear body measurements as well as carcass traits of Noiler hybrid and Yoruba ecotype chicken strains in humid tropics compared to Arbor Acre broiler using statistical analyses.



Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.

Review


To Comment


Sold By

ProjectShelve

7800

Total Item

Reviews (20)

  • Anonymous

    1 day ago

    The material is very good and worth the price being sold I really liked it 👍

  • Anonymous

    3 days ago

    Wow response was fast .. 👍 Thankyou

  • Anonymous

    1 week ago

    Trusted, faster and easy research platform.

  • TJ

    1 week ago

    great

  • Anonymous

    1 week ago

    My experience with projectselves. Com was a great one, i appreciate your prompt response and feedback. More grace

  • Anonymous

    1 week ago

    Sure plug ♥️♥️

  • Anonymous

    1 week ago

    Thanks I have received the documents Exactly what I ordered Fast and reliable

  • Anonymous

    1 week ago

    Wow this is amazing website with fast response and best projects topic I haven't seen before

  • Anonymous

    2 weeks ago

    Genuine site. I got all materials for my project swiftly immediately after my payment.

  • Anonymous

    2 weeks ago

    It agree, a useful piece

  • Anonymous

    3 weeks ago

    Good work and satisfactory

  • Anonymous

    3 weeks ago

    Good job

  • Anonymous

    3 weeks ago

    Fast response and reliable

  • Anonymous

    3 weeks ago

    Projects would've alot easier if everyone have an idea of excellence work going on here.

  • Anonymous

    3 weeks ago

    Very good 👍👍

  • Anonymous

    3 weeks ago

    Honestly, the material is top notch and precise. I love the work and I'll recommend project shelve anyday anytime

  • Anonymous

    3 weeks ago

    Well and quickly delivered

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    I am thoroughly impressed with Projectshelve.com! The project material was of outstanding quality, well-researched, and highly detailed. What amazed me most was their instant delivery to both my email and WhatsApp, ensuring I got what I needed immediately. Highly reliable and professional—I'll definitely recommend them to anyone seeking quality project materials!

  • Anonymous

    1 month ago

    Its amazing transacting with Projectshelve. They are sincere, got material delivered within few minutes in my email and whatsApp.

  • TJ

    3 months ago

    ProjectShelve is highly reliable. Got the project delivered instantly after payment. Quality of the work.also excellent. Thank you