ABSTRACT
Contamination of canned drinks surfaces with foodborne pathogens remains an important public health issue, because it lead to illness if there are malpractices in handling and storage of the product. The microbiological examination of canned drinks were analyzed to determine their level of surface contamination. 27 samples of canned drinks were collected from three different locations (distributor in Umuahia, supermarket in Ahiaeke and kiosk in Bende road) all in Umuahia metropolis. For every store or shop, nine sets of samples were collected, three (3) from the shelf, three (3) from the fridge and three(3) used as control. The isolation, identifications, characterization and microbial counts were done using standard microbiological techniques methods. All the canned drinks samples examined were contaminated with some bacterial and fungal species namely, Klebsiella species, Bacillus species, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aurues, and fungal isolates were Mucor species and Aspergillus species. The shelf samples have microbial loads from 2.3 x 101 to 6.3 x 101; while the rinsed with water samples (control) range from 1.4 x 101 to 3.2 x 101.The refrigerator samples have microbial loads from 1.1 x 101 to 2.9 x 101 while rinsed with water samples(control) range from 1.1 x 101 to 2.1 x 101. Escherichia coli had the highest percentage occurrence 13(17.7%), followed by staphylococcus species 11(13.0%) and the least was Pseudomonas species 3(5.1%). These finding suggest that most of the canned drinks stored in the open market may constitute sources of microbial food poisoning and public health hazard.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page i
Certification ii
Dedication iii
Acknowledgement iv
Table of Contents v
List of Tables vii
Abstract viii
CHAPTER ONE
1.0
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Aims of
the Study 4
1.2 Objectives
of the Study 4
CHAPTER TWO
2.0
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Composition
of Canned Drinks and Canned Drinks in Relation to Spoilage 6
2.2 Surface
Contamination 7
2.3 Microbiological
Contamination of Surfaces 8
2.4 Food Borne
Illnesses 9
2.5 Growth
Factors of Microorganisms 13
2.6 Microbiological Spoilage of Canned
Drinks 16
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 MATERIALS AND METHODS
3.1 Collection
of Samples 21
3.2 Preparation
and Sterilization of Culture Media 21
3.3 Enumeration
of Bacterial Isolates 21
3.3.1 Bacterial
Count 21
3.3.2 Identification
and Characterization of bacterial isolates 22
3.3.3 Gram
staining technique 22
3.3.4 Biochemical
tests for bacteria 22
3.4 Enumeration
of Fungal Isolates 24
3.4.1 Fungal
Count 24
3.4.2 Identification
and Characterization of Fungal Isolates 24
3.4.3 Examination
of Fungal Hyphae 24
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 RESULT
4. 1 Microbial Count 25
4.2 Discussion
of Results 37
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 CONCLUSION AND
RECOMMENDATION
5.1 Conclusion
39
5.2 Recommendation 39
References 40
LIST OF
TABLES
Table Title Page
4.1
|
Total viable
microbial count from the surface of canned drinks samples
|
26
|
4.2
|
Total viable
microbial count from the surface of canned drinks samples
|
27
|
4.3
|
Total viable
microbial count from the surface of canned drinks samples
|
28
|
4.4
|
Identification and characterization
of bacteria isolated from surface of canned
|
30
|
4.5
|
Identification and characterization of Fungal Isolates from surface of canned drinks. |
32
|
4.6
|
Distribution of bacterial isolates
from surface of canned drinks samples
|
34
|
4.7
|
Distribution of fungi isolated from surface of canned drinks samples
|
35
|
4.8
|
Percentages occurrence of microbial isolates from surface of canned drinks samples
|
37
|
CHAPTER
ONE
INTRODUCTION
In
1810, Englishman Peter Durand patented the preservation of food in tin-coated
iron cans then in 1813 two other Englishmen Brian Donkin and his brother-in-law
John Hall bought Durand’s patent to set up the first commercial canning
operation in London (Michaels, 2003). One year before the London commercial
operation, Thomas Kennett started canning meats, fruits and vegetables in New
York City. Although food had been sold in cans for many years, the first
commercial can of beer was sold in Richmond, VA in January of 1935 and by the
end of that year over 200 million cans of beer had been sold (Lee, 2003). First
introduced in 1965, aluminium beverage cans now make up about 75% of the
beverage can market share and according to the aluminium can manufacturers association
there are about 100 billion aluminium beverage cans produced in the US each
year (Gangar,2003). There are many different container types and materials used
to package beverages, such as glass bottles, aluminium cans, and plastic
bottles, all of which have the potential to become contaminated. With the
popularity of beer and soft drinks, beverages stored in cans are extremely
common. These cans are often transported and stored in packaged boxes. Cans are
often packed and displayed with the tops uncovered. During storage and
transportation, microorganisms may contaminate cans. Thus when drinking from a
can, one’s mouth comes in direct contact with the can lid allowing possible
transfer of microorganisms (Gangar, 2003).
Canned
drinks, according to Kigighai and Jonathan, (2012) are defined as packaged
beverages which might be non-alcoholic, non-carbonated or carbonated and
flavored. They are best enjoyed when served cold. Different variations or
variants of canned drinks exist depending on the flavored ingredients which
include: lemon, orange, lime, assorted fruit-juices, colas, ginger ales, sodas
and root beers according to CSDA, (1996). It is often a cliché in microbiology
that “microorganisms are ubiquitous” in that they are able to survive and live
everywhere they deem fit. Thus there might not be any place on the earth
surface that is devoid of microbial forms. Bacteria in particular like other
microbial forms are known for their ability to survive in different
environments such as on soil, air, water and canned drinks. More so, they have
been found to grow on certain materials which are deplete in nutrients and
moisture such as clothing, glassware and other inanimate objects (Pelczar et
al., 1993).
Canned drinks represent an
important market within the food industry. The increasing variety of products
being released at a bewildering rate has altered the potential for spoilage
problems. Canned drinks are generally nutrient poor media that are spoiled by
relatively few organisms – usually yeasts, and a few acid-tolerant bacteria and
fungi. Carbonation shifts the spoilage flora to those organisms tolerant of
carbon dioxide. Canned drinks enhanced by the addition of low levels of fruit
juice tend to exhibit similar spoilage flora to canned drinks. The use of ever
more exotic raw ingredients may lead to the discovery of unusual spoilage
organisms in the future. Yeasts in general, and Zygosaccharomyces bailii in particular, remain the key spoilage
organisms because of their overall physiology and resistance to organic acid
preservatives (Stratford et al.,
2000).
Several studies have shown that microbes have been able to colonize
inanimate objects such as beverage packages and other items used to consume
beverages (Dantas et al., 2006);
mobile phones of health care staff/workers (Kilic et al., 2009) and household surfaces as well as food surfaces
(Othman, 2015). Microorganisms are not just ubiquitous in nature but a plethora
of their activities in the environment can lead to positive or negative
consequences on humans, animals and plants.
There
are few published work on the associated health risk to consumers of canned or
bottle canned drinks due to microbial contamination from the surfaces and
orifces especially in the third World and developing countries. Kigighai and
Jonathan (2012), carried out the microbiological survey of non-alcoholic
carbonated beverages and reported the presence of bacterial pathogens such as Staphylococcus, Bacillus, Enterococcus,
Micrococcus Proteus and Pseudomonas species
which are of public health significance. Griffiths et al. (1997) carried out an analysis of the quality of the
ingredients used in the Canned drink Industries. In the City of Ibadan, Amusa et al. (2005) carried out microbiological
and nutritional studies on the quality of hawked sorrel drinks popularly known
as zobo and the report revealed a plethora of microbial contaminants of public
health importance which include Bacillus
cereus, B. subtilis, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus and Escherichia. Fungal contaminants were also reported which are
basically species in the genus Aspergillus,
Penicillium, Fusarium and Rhizopus.
Oranusi et al. (1994) in a technical
report, studied the microbial contaminants of commercially bottled
non-alcoholic beverage available in Nigeria at the time and 50% of a total of
analyzed 90 samples were contaminated mainly with saprophytic and
non-pathogenic bacterial species such as Bacillus,
Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Micrococcus.
With
the recent news of leptospirosis on the internet (Gompf, 2017; CDC, 2017),
there are concerns over the safety of consumers who consumes canned drinks most
especially canned drinks directly from the orifice. Just as the definition of
canned drinks goes, it is best consumed when cold or chilled thus most
consumers do not take cleaning the canned drink surfaces seriously before
consumption while others are under the assumption and illusion of the fact that
when it is brought out of the refrigerator cold or chilled, it is apparently
safe for consumption. Contamination of canned drinks surface can occur anywhere
including environment where it was manufactured to the point of storage in the
refrigerator as well as point of consumption. Studies have shown that certain
bacterial and fungal species of public health importance are able to survive
refrigeration temperature (Davenport,1995a).
Kregiel, (2015) reported that Canned drinks consumption is still a
controversial issue for public health and public policy. Through the years,
several studies have been carried out to evaluate the possible links between
the consumption of canned drink and associated health problems. The findings,
however, remain highly contested. Nonetheless, there is an increasing emphasis
being placed on the health properties of canned drinks, by both the industry
and the consumers. Moreover, there are extant rules already in place to ensure that
manufacturers of canned drinks conform to established national and
international standards (Davesmith, 1997). Most consumers believe that the canned
drinks are safe for consumption in whatever form and that their quality is
guaranteed; but little do they understand that there is also another reason to
worry over our public health as it concerns canned drinks or food. Hygiene is
one aspect of science that most persons do not give much credence to.
Notwithstanding, in the science of hygiene, everything is a potential infection
vehicle including the orifice or surfaces of canned drinks (Czajka,2005a).
1.1 AIMS OF THE STUDY
The aim of the study is to examine the microorganisms from surfaces of
canned drinks sold at different locations in Umuahia metropolis, Abia state.
1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The objectives of the study includes:
1.
To isolate and characterize microorganisms
(bacteria and fungi) present on the surfaces of canned drinks sold in Umuahia
metropolis
2.
To determine the microbial loads
of contaminated canned drinks surfaces.
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment