GENDER ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF ORGANIC AND INORGANIC AGRO INPUTS AMONG ARABLE CROP FARMERS IN BENUE AND IMO STATES, NIGERIA

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00009233

No of Pages: 181

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦10000

  • $

ABSTRACT

The study investigated gender analysis of organic and inorganic agro-inputs use among arable crop farmers in Benue and Imo States, Nigeria. Specifically, the study determined different types of organic and inorganic agro-inputs, determined gender roles differentiation in the use of organic and inorganic agro-inputs across gender in the study area among others. Multistage sampling procedure was employed in the selection of 288 respondents. Data were collected through interview schedule as well as questionnaire and were analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics such as mean counts, frequencies, percentage, Ordinary Least Square and Z-test statistic. Results revealed that male farmers in Benue State utilized high levels of organic agro-inputs like poultry droppings (x̅ = 2.87), goat dung (x̅ = 2.76). While female utilized more of poultry droppings (x̅ = 2.52), goat dung (x̅ = 2.62). Subsequently low levels of organic agro-inputs utilization applies to both male and female farmers in Imo State such as poultry droppings (x̅ = 1.06 and x̅ = 1.83) and pig dung (x̅ = 1.22 and x̅ = 1.18) respectively. Also male farmers in Benue performed tedious roles like transportation of organic manure to the farm (21.4%) and purchasing of organic manure (20.7%). Females were involved in mild roles like preparation of wood ash (63.6%) and application of wood ash, palm bunch ash to crops (66.4%). In the same vein Imo male farmers transported organic manure to farms ((25%) and applied neem extract to crops (23.6%), while females applied organic manure to crops (20.1%). In the application of inorganic agro-inputs, males in Benue performed the roles of mixing and spraying of pesticides and herbicides (69.3%) and (67.9%) respectively. Females fetched water (32.9%) and provided containers (65%) as well. In Imo males transported fertilizers to farms (25%) and fetched water (59%), while females provided containers (10.5%). However major constraints identified by farmers in Benue in the use of organic inputs were bulkiness of organic manure, lack of efficient marketing and distribution system and gender of extension agents. While Imo farmers faced challenges like organic manure attracts pests and diseases, organic manure is bulky, offensive odor is displeasing. General constraints faced in the use of inorganic inputs were high cost of fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides, lack of government support. Result of OLS showed significant relationship between farmers` use of organic and inorganic agro-inputs and selected socioeconomic characteristics hence hypotheses 1 and 2 were rejected at 5% level. Z-test result of hypothesis 3 was not significant across gender at 5% level, while hypotheses 4,5,6,7 and 8 were significant at 5% level respectively. The study concluded that majority of male farmers` cultivated larger portions of farmland, utilized higher quantities of agro-inputs than females. Major constraints in the use of agro-inputs were offensive odor and bulkiness of organic manure, high cost of fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides and late delivery of fertilizers to farmers. The study recommended that female farmers should have access to enough farmland for arable crop production. Government should release fertilizers and other agro-inputs early and at cheaper rates to farmers in Nigeria.  






TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page                                                                                                                    i

Declaration                                                                                                                 ii

Certification                                                                                                               iii

Dedication                                                                                                                  iv

Acknowledgements                                                                                                    v

Table of Contents                                                                                                       vi

List of Figures                                                                                                             x

List of Tables                                                                                                              xi

Abstract                                                                                                                       xiii

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION                                                                                                   

1.1       Background of the Study                                                                                1

1.2       Statement of the Problem                                                                               10

1.3       Research Questions                                                                                        16

1.4       Objectives of the Study                                                                                  16

1.5       Test of Hypotheses                                                                                         17

1.6       Justification of the Study                                                                                18

1.7       Scope of the Study                                                                                          20

1.8       Definition of Terms and Operational Variables                                             21

 

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW                                                   

2.1       Gender Needs in Agriculture                                                                          24

2.1.1    Gender and technology adoption                                                                    25

2.1.2    Gender barriers in agriculture                                                                        28

2.1.3    Gender roles in agriculture                                                                             34

2.1.4    Gender and division of labor in agriculture                                                   38

2.1.5    Gender and productivity gap in agriculture                                                   43

2.1.6    Gender differences in inputs use                                                                    45

2.1.7    Gender and knowledge differences                                                                46

2.1.8    Gender access to agricultural information and organization                         47

2.1.9    Gender access to financial support and extension services                            49

2.2       Organic and Inorganic Inputs Use According to Gender                               50

2.2.1    Organic and inorganic inputs use by farmers                                                 52

2.2.2    Gender roles in community governance                                                        53

2.2.3    Gender exclusion in community relations                                                      61

2.3       Review of some Theories                                                                               64

2.3.1    The biological determinism theory                                                                64

2.3.2    Cultural determinism theory                                                                           66

2.3.3    Materialist determinism theory                                                                      67

2.3.4    Gender equality theory                                                                                   68

2.4       Theoretical Framework                                                                                  70

2.4.1    Theoretical perspective on gender                                                                  72

2.5       Conceptual Framework                                                                                  73

CHAPTER 3:  METHODOLOGY                                                            

3.1       The Study Area                                                                                               80

3.2       Population of the Study                                                                                  83

3.3       Sample Size and Sampling Procedure                                                            83

3.4       Data Collection                                                                                               84

3.5       Test of Validity of Instrument                                                                                    85

3.6        Reliability of Instrument                                                                               85

3.7          Data Analysis                                                                                               86

3.8       Measurement of Variables and Model Specification                                     86

3.9       Test of Hypotheses                                                                                         90

CHAPTER 4:  RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1       Socio-Economic Characteristics of Male and Female arable Crop Farmers in the

Level  of  Use of  Organic and Inorganic Agro-Inputs in the Study Area.   95

4.1.1    Age of  respondents                                                                                        95

4.1.2    Marital status of respondents                                                              96

4.1.3    Major occupation                                                                                           96

4.1.4    Educational level of respondents                                                                    98

4.1.5    Annual farm income of respondents (N,000)                                                 99

4.1.6    Extension contact of respondents                                                                   99

4.1.7    Method of land acquisition                                                                             100

4.1.8    Farm size (ha)                                                                                                 101

4.1.9    Household size of respondents                                                                       102

4.1.10  Farming experience of respondents                                                                102

4.1.11  Membership of cooperative organizations of respondents                             103

4.1.12  Respondents access to credit                                                                          104

4.2       Mean Scores of Respondents Level of Use of Inorganic Agro-inputs in Benue

and Imo States                                                                                                105

4.3       Mean Scores of Respondents  Level of Use of Organic Agro-inputs in Benue

and Imo States                                                                                                109

4.4       Gender Roles Differentiation in the Application of Organic Agro-inputs in

Benue and Imo State                                                                                       113

4.5       Gender Roles Differentiation in the Application of Inorganic agro-inputs

in Benue and Imo States                                                                                 116

4.6       Constraints Faced by Respondents in the Level of Use of Organic Agro-inputs

in Benue and Imo States                                                                                 119

4.7       Constraints Faced by Respondents in the Level of Use of Inorganic Agro-inputs

in Benue and Imo State                                                                                  122

4.6       Test of Hypotheses                                                                                         125

CHAPTER 5:  SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1       Summary                                                                                                        137

5.2       Conclusion                                                                                                      140

5.3       Recommendations                                                                                          141

References                                                                                                      143

Appendices

 

 

 


 

LIST OF FIGURES

2.1       Conceptual framework for gender analysis of organic and inorganic        

            agro-inputs use among arable crop farmers in Benue and Imo States,

            Nigeria.                                                                                                     79

 

2          Map of Nigeria showing the study area                                              82

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIST OF TABLES

 

4.1     Socio-economic characteristics of male and female respondents in

          the study area.                                                                                          97

4.2     Mean distribution of respondents based on the level of use of

          inorganic agro-inputs in Benue and Imo States                                       106

4.3     Mean distribution of respondents based on the level of use of

          organic agro-inputs in Benue and Imo States                                          111

4.4     Distribution of respondents according to gender roles in the

          application of organic agro-inputs                                                           114

4.5     Distribution of  respondents according to gender roles in the application

          of inorganic agro-inputs (%) scores                                                         116

4.6     Mean distribution of  respondents based on constraints faced in the  level of

          use of organic agro-inputs                                                                        120

4.7     Mean distribution of  respondents based on constraints faced in the level of

          use of inorganic agro-inputs                                                                    122

4.8a   Ordinary least square regression estimate of the influence of selected

          socio-economic characteristics on male farmers` use of organic agro-inputs        125

4.8b  Ordinary least square regression estimate of the influence of selected

          socio-economic characteristics on female farmers use of

          organic agro-inputs                                                                                  127

4.9a   Ordinary least square regression estimate of the influence of

          selected socio-economic characteristics on male farmers use of

          in-organic agro-inputs                                                                              128

4.9b  Ordinary least square regression estimate of the influence of

          selected socio-economic characteristics on female farmers use of

          in-organic agro-inputs                                                                              130

4.10   Z-test comparative analysis of the difference in the level of use of

          organic agro-inputs between male and female crop farmers in the

          study area                                                                                                             131

4.11   Z-test comparative analysis of the level of use of inorganic

          agro-inputs between male and female crop farmers in the study area               132

4.12   Z-test comparative analysis of the level of use of organic agro-inputs

            among male farmers in Benue and Imo States                                      133

4.13     Z-test comparative analysis of the Level of use of organic agro-inputs

            among female farmers` in Benue and Imo States                                  134

4.14     Z-test comparative analysis of the Level of use of inorganic agro-inputs

            among male farmers in Benue and Imo States                                      135

4.15   Z-test comparative analysis of the level of use of inorganic agro-inputs

          among female farmers in Benue and Imo States                                                 136

                                                                                    

 

 

 



 

 

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION   


1.1       BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Gender is attributed as social differences that exit between men and women (Oladeebo, 2012). Gender is also conceived as a variable used to analyze roles, rights, responsibilities, opportunities, incentives, costs, benefits and constraints which relates to men and women (Kanu, 2012). According to Dickson, et al. (2014) gender constitutes one of the determinants of how poverty is experienced and of wealth creation. They further stated that the entitlements and rights of women and men to decision making, opportunities and resources are based on socio-cultural norms rather than on the rights and capabilities of women and men.

Agriculture is very important in the economy of Nigeria because both male and female farmers turn out or make into being both cash and food crops like rubber, oil palm, cocoa, rice, yam, cassava and even vegetables. It also provides job opportunities for over 66% of the population and equally adds to the overseas exchange earnings of the country, (International Fund for Agricultural Development IFAD, 2014). Despite the discovery and exploitation of crude oil agrculture remains a major sector which contributes for about 40% of the country`s GDP (IFAD, 2014). As a matter of fact, it generates household income and supplies food and raw materials for the majority of the people (National Bureau of Statistics NBS, 2012).

The natural poverty of soils in Nigeria in particular and in Sub-Saharan Africa is a contributing factor to insufficient food as a result of low soil organic matter content (Shiyam & Binang, 2013). Small-scale farmers turn out the bulk of food in Nigeria and have to embrace the application of both organic and inorganic agro-inputs in order to boost yield through bumper harvest (International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) (2011); Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO, 2013b).

In order to achieve agricultural efficiency in developing Countries, adequate inputs are very necessary (Ajah and Nmadu, 2012). There is a strong suggestion that in developing Countries, technologies and inputs needed to achieve better or enlarged productivity are  inadequate or exorbitant to resource meager farmers (Wiggins & Brooks, 2010). According to Druihe & Barreiro-Hurle (2012) unavailability and un-affordability of inorganic fertilizers are among the problems hampering arable crop yield in Nigeria.

Although inorganic fertilizers increase yield in the short run, but it may be both uneconomical and environmentally unfriendly (Shiyam & Binang, 2013). The authors stated that organic fertilizer unlike the inorganic option is environmentally sustainable and able to achieve increased agricultural productivity. According to Adeoluwa (2010), organic farming is a form of agriculture which excludes the utilization of compound fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides, plant growth regulators and livestock feed additives.  Therefore, organic materials like animal droppings, green mulch, palm bunch ash, wood ash, cocoa pods, rice mill wastes, kitchen wastes are applied to boost productivity. Oyeniran (2011) defined natural crop growing as the process of producing food naturally. He further declared that it is based on smallest use of off-farm inputs and management practices that enhance, maintain, and return environmental unity or agreement. Conventional agriculture has become one of the favored options for the production of safe, highly nutritious food and long term sustainability.

In Nigeria both men and women play very important and vital roles in socio-economic activities in the community as well as family levels through survival agriculture. It is very obvious that the contribution of both men and women in crop production and food security is the unexploited green oil of Nigeria. However, rural women have less access than men to the resources and opportunities they need to be fully productive in agriculture and to ensure food security, nutrition and well-being of their families and future generations. For example, because of legal and cultural constraints affecting land inheritance, ownership and use worldwide, fewer than 20 percent of landholders are women in every Millennium Development Goal (MDG) indicator for which data are available, rural women are worse than rural men and worse than urban women and men (Inter-Agency Task Force on Rural Women, 2012: 36).

Although women farmers make up the majority of farmers in Nigeria, yet they have less right to use fruitful resources and government support than men (ActionAid, 2011).  A study carried out by Adepoju et al., (2013) revealed that about 42.3 percent of male and 22.1 percent of female farmers practiced mulching. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is actively promoting various organic methods of soil fertilization and repair, including conservation farming, with cover crops and lower zero tillage, agro-forestry, nitrogen-fixing legumes, composting and crop rotation (FAO, 2011a).

A management approach known as incorporated top soil richness (ISFM) recognizes the need for both organic and chemical inputs to improve soil health, and acknowledge that no one size will fit all. In Borno State, Nigeria, Kwaghe et al, (2011) reported that female and male farmers use agricultural waste comprising crop residues and animal wastes whose cost is about 4% of the farmers` total annual revenue.

Similarly Yusuf et al, (2013) also discussed sustainable agricultural practices where farmers dig pits and the water accumulated was used for all year round farming thereby reducing the socio-economic costs of drilling boreholes for irrigation activities and simultaneously restoring fauna to an otherwise waste land. A study conducted by   SPORE (2011), also stated that majority of small-scale farmers (70%) practice organic farming because of the prohibitive costs of chemical fertilizers and other agrochemicals. SPORE (2011) further stated that organic farm produce store longer and taste better than inorganic farm produce. Traditionally, female and male farmers equally engage in composting to provide adequate natural manures to their farms at the subsistence levels. Organic farming in Nigeria rely heavily on animal manure, crop residues, green manures, legumes, kitchen wastes and mineral-bearing rocks to feed the soil and supply plant nutrients.

This is in accordance with Nwachukwu (2010) who reported that application of compost crop alternation practice, planting of home grown or local varieties, intercropping, varied cropping, use of crop residues, mulching of crops, animal manure, planting of legumes, green manure, off-farm organic wastes, lane cropping and least tillage are the technologies in organic farming practiced by female and male farmers in Imo State of Nigeria.  Also a study conducted by Koledoye et al, (2013) revealed that in soil management practices, 59.6 percent of male and 39.7 of female respondents practiced bush fallowing, 25.0 percent of male and just 13.2 percent of female farmers engaged in cover cropping. Whereas only 11.5 percent of male and none of female practiced crop rotation respectively. According to FAO (2008) conventional farming provides ecological goods and services.

As rightly put by Kang (2007) mainstreaming of gender at all levels in the agricultural sector should be actively done so that the issue of gender disparities will be addressed properly. Nevertheless, women still encounter several challenges even though they are the key part of conservative cultivation (Kandiwa, 2013). Ayinde et al. (2013a) agreed that it is very important to strategize so that men and women`s experiences and concerns at the onset of investigation design, implementation, monitoring and assessment are well deliberated. This means looking at the socio-economic settings of women and men to guarantee equal benefits often referred to as gender mainstreaming.

The issue of gender differences as it relates to farm productivity in subsistence farming has been of special interest from the beginning to policy makers in developing countries like Nigeria (Mabundza et al., 2014; Kabeer, 2016; Rola-Rubzen et al., 2016; Morgan et al., 2016). An empirical study had found out that female farmers have lower crop yields than male farmers (Larson et al., 2015).  It has been established from studies that women are likely to have less land to cultivate than men, and when they do, tenure security or right may be weaker or totally not available (Doss, 2015; Cadzow, 2016). Also women access to technology, information and agricultural extension services tend to be more limited compared with men (Bravo-Monroy et al, 2016).

In the area of growing crops, women are more vulnerable to be constrained in their access to inputs, resulting in lower levels of fertilizer, labor and other inputs than is necessary (Oseni et al., 2015; Cadzow 2016). A number of factors like lack of contact to credit, illiteracy, lack of information, skill, machinery and scarcity of land could be responsible in the disparity linking female and male farmers in the level of use of agricultural inputs in many developing countries like Nigeria.

Another point is that men and women usually have diverse or dissimilar agricultural production functions, due to the fact that crop choice differs by sexual category. This may be influenced by lack of resources coupled with artistic norms and also ethinically accepted division of labour in the cultivation of specific crops. Although natural manure contains plant nutrients in small quantities when compared with chemical fertilizer, however the existence of growth promoting values like hormones and enzymes are essential for the improvement of soil richness and productivity (Bhuma, 2007).

It is very necessary to increase agricultural productivity in Nigeria, and this is being done through the introduction and use of improved agricultural technologies like chemical fertilizers. Generally, the term fertilizer describes additives that increase soil fertility and its capacity of producing abundant crops.

Nutrients are materials provided through the application of fertilizer to enhance the fertility of the soil; this could be in form of inorganic or natural materials which include animal dung and compounds containing Nitrogen, Phosphorous and Potassium (NPK). This may be spread on or incorporated into the soil to augment its capacity to retain dampness, nutrients and thereby support plant development (Houghton et al, 2011).

A study conducted by Koledoye et al, (2013) revealed that 100.00 percent of male as against 97.10 percent of female farmers used inorganic fertilizer. Also male plot managers are more likely to use inputs such as fertilizer (42%and 19%), herbicides (26 percent and 6 percent) than female plot managers. However, only about 16% of the soil resources in Africa have no serious limitation for crop production (Adesina, 2012).

Furthermore, prolific soils have been lost through deforestation, corrosion, flood and encroachment of the desert which hitherto has led to poor yield (Babatunde, 2005). Although organic manure and plant residues are important sources of nutrient however they are unable to supply all the nutrients needed to grow adequate food. Consequently, there is no alternative or option for compound fertilizers in meeting the nutrients required for plant development.

Moreover, it is only when proper soil richness is maintained that new crop varieties can achieve their hereditary potentials in terms of improved yield. This can be achieved efficiently and on a large scale through augmented use of fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides (Babatunde, 2005). Agrochemical could be described as a wide range of pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, and sometimes including fungicides. It may also include inorganic fertilizers, chemical growth agents and hormones as well as other intense stores of raw animal manure (Larry, 2012). Several agricultural chemical are toxic and can pose danger to human health (WHO, 2008); hence their use is highly regulated internationally, nationally and regionally with regulations and conventions.

Methods or process for handling, application and disposal of used agrochemical cans are often mandatory. The utilization of agrochemical like NPK, Urea, Phostoxin, Furadan, Apron-plus, Dazel, Paraquate, Glyphosate even though they boost yield, however the products are made up of less natural materials. Agrochemical many at times are very hurtful or injurious to human beings and also could cause great danger to the surrounding.

The adoption of fertilizers and herbicides in intensive farms is seen as the only hope of feeding the expanding world population. However, wrong application of chemical fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides can lead to environmental degradation through the destruction of biodiversity and pollution of the environment. Government promoted the use of agrochemical in other to achieve and sustain national food security and improve the production of export crops. The cultivation of crops is accompanied by the application of agrochemical. Female and male farmers are increasingly relying on the application of inorganic fertilizers mainly because the soils are poor, and indigenous crop types are being replaced mostly by improved high yielding crop varieties which are deep nutrient miners.

Majority of crops cultured by farmers are short period in nature, which may be similarly vulnerable or prone to many insects and diseases. They eat up the plants and also replicate on them. Therefore, farmers have no choice than to use agrochemical to fight against attack from insects and diseases (Larry, 2012). Agricultural policies in Nigeria have generally followed the path of modernism, that is the desire to break up with the past (traditional agriculture considered to be unproductive or unfruitful). Previous policies and programmes targeted at improving the productivity of smallholder farmers relied on technical assistance through the provision of external inputs such as fertilizers, herbicides, insecticides and hybrid seeds.

Agricultural modernization is still regarded as the key to achieving food security and economic growth in Nigeria. Inorganic fertilizer refers to chemical mixture used to improve soil fertility. Inorganic fertilizer examples NPK, Urea, Calcium nitrate and Single Super Phosphate (SSP) is differentiated from organic fertilizer (such as animal manure, compost or other green mulch) by its manufacture, chemical modification and external purchase. Herbicides like Dragon, Paraquat, Vinash, Slasher and Weed-off and pesticides like Phostoxin, Termicide, Snipper, Vetox 85, Fernasan D and Apron-plus (also called farm chemical or agrochemical) are primarily inorganic spray applied to expand agriculturally productive land and increase crop yields through pests, bacteria and weed destruction or control.

Multiple cropping practices in organic farming boost biodiversity which enhances productivity, resilience and contributes to a healthy farming system (Abdullahi and Kutama, 2012). Furthermore the use of inert or chemical fertilizers may attract more weeds on the plot thereby necessitating the use of herbicides to check-mate weed infestation. Irrigation system helps to secure adequate soil moisture for proper use of inert fertilizer, and hence improve seed varietal growth. Rosegrant et al, (2014), stated that using a crop model incorporating climate change scenario, predict massive gains to combining nitrogen at efficient levels with irrigated maize and rice in sub-Saharan Africa.


1.2       STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Inequality in the right to use agricultural assets among female and male farmers has always been linked with production inefficiency. Moreover interventions targeting small holder farmers especially women often fail to redress the right to use and manage agricultural resources (Quisumbing and Pandolfelli, 2010). Notwithstanding the important role female farmers play in agricultural production, earlier work in Nigeria showed that women have comparatively little right to direct agricultural farmland, have lower levels of agro-inputs and use less extension services compared with their male counterparts (Phillip et al, 2009).

According to British Council (2012) women own 4 percent of land in the North/east, and just over 10 percent in the South/east and South/west. The World Bank (2014) reported gender disparity in plots managed by men and women in Northern and Southern zones. Key gender differences exists in land size, fertilizer use, labour and other  household characteristics.

Assuming women farmers have the same right and management over agricultural resources like men, they could probably boost yields on their farms by 20-30%. This may however raise total crop yield in emerging countries like Nigeria by 2.5 to 4% (FAO, 2014). In Borno State also, the levels of women`s access to production resources, including macrobiotic and inorganic agricultural resources, family and hired labor and land was reported to be low (Ojo et al., 2012). Gender disparity remains a drastic challenge to the advancement of human resources.

Women and girls have made major strides since 1990 to gain equity sexual category yet to no avail. Very often, girls and women are discriminated against in various areas of life venture such as agricultural participation and labor market with negative representations for their capabilities and liberty to make choices (United Nations Development Programme (UNDP, 2014).

This section, therefore, tries to ascertain the effect of gender inequality on agricultural development and how it can be used to enhance sustainable human resources development in Nigeria. Inputs in the form of improved seeds, fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides are available in Nigeria to both rural men and women farmers. However, men (74%) had more right to these inputs than women (67%) therefore confirming the FAO (2011) observation that there is a wide gender gap/disparity in agricultural inputs usage. For example male headed households use more inorganic agro-inputs than their female counterparts in many countries (FAO, 2011).

In a related development, Nasiru and Rahji (2012) studied the availability of productive resources in Nigeria and concluded that female headed households suffered less right to vital information, credit services and farmlands. These women were actually more productive and had higher income than men when all necessary production inputs are made available to them at least at an equal level with the male farmers.

Overall, women`s access to land in African societies is quite restricted, even in cases where the law protects women`s right to land, traditional customs inhibit their right and power over land (National Population Commission (NPC, 2013). This agrees with Odoemelam et al, (2014) who stated that women have to beg for farmlands from their husbands and relations hence, women marginalization.

This inequitable access to resources has remained the basic factor reinforcing gender dichotomy because women farmers are competing with men farmers for the same basic resources in the most patriarchal entitlement system. This has negative effect on the productivity of women farmers and tend to slow economic growth, making rise from poverty more difficult (World Bank, 2007). “We are nonetheless able to state with some certainty that women typically own less land than do men and that their agricultural plots tend to be smaller than men`s” (Doss et al.,2013).  Also the rising poverty among female farmers in Nigeria is assuming a worrisome dimension as empirical studies have shown becaue of disparity in the utilization of productive resources (Babatunde, 2014).

Reports from different countries found that women use fewer inputs than men, have fewer meetings with extension agents, find it more difficult to access credit, and as a result their productivity is lower (Doss et al., 2011; Peterman et al., 2014; and Oseni et al. 2014). Women have been rated high as the backbone of the development of rural and natural economies and they represent 43% of the global agricultural labor and productivity.

A study of farm credit schemes conducted in Africa found that women were able to get only 10% share of loans that was released for agriculture. Statistics on women`s yields, technology, utilization of farm agricultural inputs and adoption rates are rarely reported (FAO, 2009). World Bank (2013) reported that women make up about 60-80% of agricultural labor in Nigeria, depending on the region, and that they produce two-thirds of staple crops.

In Africa, 80% of agricultural production activities are carried out by small holder farmers, who are mostly rural women, yet they do not have the right and power over farmlands and prolific resources like inorganic fertilizers, pesticides herbicides among others (Mucavele and Mugede, 2015).

Mohammed (2012) stated that agrochemical use among farmers has not been significant, as to increase agricultural output, the problem is more compounded among rural women farmers because of the gender bias issues in agricultural policy making and implementation. Both men and women contribute to agricultural production significantly, yet their access to these agricultural resources differ (Quisumbing et al., 2014;  FAO, 2010).  

There is an unpleasant signal that inequality in sexual characteristics as well as lack of attention to gender in agricultural advancement adds to low income, high rate of poverty smaller output, as well as under nutrition. Unequal gender dealings that leave women in a subordinated position to men prevail despite government assurance or dedication all over the world to gender equality. Despite the fact that women are key part to the majority in agricultural production, yet they face intricate challenges in various ways (Kandiwa, 2013). In the area of growing crops, women are more vulnerable to be constrained in their access to inputs, resulting in lower levels of fertilizer, labor and other inputs than is necessary (Oseni et al, 2015; Cadzow, 2016). According to Quisumbing et al. (2014) agriculture is under performing because half of women farmers do not have the same right with men to resources and opportunities earmarked for agricultural production in the country.

 A woman empowered to make choice about planting materials and inputs will be more fruitful in agriculture than one who could not. The agricultural sector is under performing in many developing countries, in part because women unlike men farmers do not have same right to the resources and opportunities they need to be more productive. Small holder farmers currently produce 90 percent of food in Africa and around half of all food world-wide (ActionAid, 2010).

However, women face great challenges in agriculture mainly because of their deprived right to inputs coupled with their relative need for learning and trouble of voluntary domestic work (Phillip et al. 2009). Ogunlela and Mukthar (2009), explains that high levels of gender imbalance combined with social, religious, physical and biological factors promote discrimination against women in terms of employment, education and access to resources. These farmers` have farm holdings in the range of about 1.0-3.0 hectares of farmland.

They also form the bedrock of agricultural enhancement in several African countries (Ogunlela and Mukthar, 2009). According to Oyeniran (2011) natural agriculture is a distinct process of producing food naturally. He further affirmed that it is based on minimal or smallest use of off-farm inputs and organization practices which maintains, restores and enhances environmental synchronization. Organic farming has become the most favored option for the production of safe, highly nutritious food and long term sustainability (Oyeniran, 2011).

The idea behind organic farming is 'zero impact' on the environment hence the motto of the organic farmer is to protect the earth`s resources and produce safe, healthy food. Organic farming uses natural regulation and crop diversity to prevent pests and diseases. As reported by Adeoluwa (2010), natural farming is a form of agriculture which excludes the utilization of chemical or synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, plant growth regulators and livestock feed additives. Therefore, organic materials like animal droppings, green mulch, palm bunch ash, wood ash, cocoa pods, rice mill wastes, kitchen wastes are applied to boost productivity. He further highlighted the benefits of organic manure which incluude increases in soil fertility; improvement in water conservation; increases in production more than inorganic fertilizer; easier to access than any other fertilizer; is less capital intensive and retains soil fertility over time.

There is inequality and disparities as it regards gender in the utilization of organic and inorganic agro-inputs in Benue and Imo States. Gender influences human beings in different ways, but it is unknown how this influence affects them whether positively or negatively.  The researcher`s interest was to find out the influence gender has on male and female arable crop farmers in the application or utilization of organic and inorganic agro-inputs, as well as to identify similar or diverging constraints in accessing agricultural resources. This study addressed the following research questions:

 

1.3       RESEARCH QUESTIONS

1          What are the socio-economic characteristics of male and female farmers?

2          What are the different types of inorganic agro- inputs available?

3           What are the different types of organic agro-inputs available?

4          What roles do male and female farmers play in the application of organic agro-inputs?

5         What roles do male and female farmers play in the application of inorganic agro-inputs ?

6          What are the constraints male and female farmers face in the use of organic agro-inputs?

7        What are the constraints male and female farmers face in the use of inorganic agro-inputs in the study area?


1.4       OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The major objective of the study was to investigate the level of use of organic and inorganic agro inputs among male and female arable crop farmers in Benue and Imo States, Nigeria.

The specific objectives were to:

      i.         describe the socio-economic characteristics of male and female crop farmers in the study area,

     ii.         identify the different types of inorganic agro-inputs used by crop farmers;

   iii.         find out the different types of organic agro-inputs used by crop farmers;

   iv.         determine gender roles differentiation in the use of organic agro-inputs;

     v.         determine gender roles differentiation in the  use of inorganic agro-inputs;

   vi.         ascertain constraints male and female farmers face in the use of organic agro-inputs;

  vii.         ascertain constraints male and female farmers face in the use of  inorganic agro-inputs in the study area.


1.5       HYPOTHESES

The following hypotheses were tested

H01:    There is no significant relationship between farmers` selected socio-economic characteristics and the  use of organic agro-inputs

H02:    There is no significant relationship between farmers` selected socio-economic characteristics and the use of inorganic agro-inputs

HO3:   There is no significant difference in the use of organic agro-inputs between male and female crop farmers in the study area

HO4:  There is no significant difference in the use of inorganic agro-inputs between male and female crop farmers in the study area

HO5: There is no significant difference in the use of organic agro-inputs among male farmers in Benue and Imo States.

Ho6:       There is no significant difference in the use of organic agro-inputs amongfemale farmers in Benue and Imo States.

HO7:       There is no significant difference in the use of inorganic agro-inputs among male farmers in Benue and Imo States.

HO8:     There is no significant difference in the use of inorganic agro-inputs among female farmers in Benue and Imo States


1.6       JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY

The question that arises for debate about gender has become mainly a sensitive issue in the world today. Currently we hear and speak about gender equality, emancipation and liberation in almost every facet or sphere of human endeavor. The utilization of natural agro-input materials predominantly or mainly poultry droppings, green mulch, cow dung, wood ash, palm bunch ash, neem extract, kitchen waste and back garden manure which serve or provide soil amendments is suitable for plant growth and also boosts crop yield especially among rural male and female arable crop farmers in Nigeria.

Therefore, conscious efforts have been made by successive governments to promote the use of improved seeds, fertilizers and other agrochemicals to address food insecurity and poverty challenges. This research serves as a guide to policy makers with special regards to the access and the utilization of natural and artificial agro-inputs by gender in Nigeria and particularly in the study area.

It will equally sharpen policy framework with the view to improving the availability of natural and artificial agro-inputs supplies to rural farmers for sustainable agricultural production in Nigeria. This will be achieved by looking at the constraints that farmers encounter in the utilization of agricultural productive resources. Consequently, it will also serve as a working document for theory formulation and practice on issues concerning gender involvement and the influence it has in the application of organic and inorganic agro-inputs. 

Researchers would find the results of this study as a veritable tool. Although several researches have been conducted in this area, but it was observed that the reports of such researches were found in bits in various journals.

This makes it difficult for researchers to understand, access and extract adequate knowledge from such investigations. Hence this study would provide accumulated information on the result of such investigations. . Therefore, a comprehensive study like this will create an enabling environment in the Nigerian agricultural sector. 

As a way forward this study will serve as a data bank to researchers, Centre for Gender studies, Federal Ministry of Agriculture and other individuals who might be interested in this area of study. Nutrients from organic sources are released slowly and consistently which prevents the possibility of a boom-and-bust pattern. Farmers` benefit from utilization of natural agro-inputs frequently because it increases the organic matter content of the soil with subsequent long term effect on crop yield. This enhances the biological, corporal and compound properties of the soils with increasing organic manure.

At the same time increase in soil natural carbon pool in root zone, significantly increases crops like (wheat, maize and rice) yield. The implication of the result is that productivity can be improved by linking farmers to inputs markets through improvement in infrastructure and creating an enabling environment for input dealers to locate closely to farming communities. This study seems significant in the area of Agricultural Extension Education Service reform.

The result will lead to the recruitment and training of more female extension agents to disseminate adequate information and innovation flow to female farmers as it relates to the right and application of natural and inert agro-inputs. This will ensure that production inputs get to the real farmers and that extension agents direct equal attention to both female and male arable crop farmers.  Most importantly a study of this nature has no doubt added to the already existing body of knowledge as it regards gender and the utilization of natural and artificial agro-inputs. Moreover, the scientific publications that will arise from this study will be directed at the academic or research community. Also young professionals will gain immensely from the study.

 

1.7       SCOPE OF THE STUDY

The study was conducted in Benue and Imo States, Nigeria. The study concentrated mainly on arable crop farmers` in the two states, therefore further studies should be carried out to cover other agro-ecological zones of Nigeria. The focus of the study on South-East and North-Central agro-ecological zones was to make ecological comparisons to help identify the disparities that male and female crop farmers encounter as well as to identify similar or diverging constraints in the utilization of natural and chemical agro-inputs across the States. The researcher focused on the objectives of the study and other variables relating to the hypotheses for effective analysis.

 

1.8       DEFINITION OF TERMS

Gender: is conceived as a variable used to analyze roles, rights, responsibilities, opportunities, incentives, costs, benefits and constraints which relates to men and women (Kanu, 2012).

Gender Analysis According to Ityarvyarl (2008), investigation in sexual category is a systematic effort to understand and document the tasks and responsibilities of females and males of different social status, age, and ethnicity as shaped by beliefs, values, norms, traditions and access to resources.

Inorganic Fertilizer refers to a nitrogen-based chemical mixture used to improve soil fertility. Examples are: N.P.K (multi-purpose fertilizer), Urea, Calcium nitrate (CAN), Single Supper Phosphate (SSP) and Muriate of Potash (MOP).

 Organic manures are non chemical substances applied or incorporated into the soil for plant uptake. They could be plant or animal materials. For the purpose of this study, organic manures include poultry droppings, goat dung, cow dung, kitchen waste, green mulch, cocoa pods, compost manure, palm bunch ash, wood ash among others.

Pesticides are chemical substances that kill pests examples are phostoxin, Apron-plus, Termicide and Snipper.

Improved and genetically modified seed varieties are artificially produced by cross-pollination to increase yield, uniformity and resistance to diseases. Examples are Maize, Rice, Cassava, Wheat, Bailey and potato.

Organic pesticide and weed control measures

Organic agriculture uses natural regulation and crop diversity to prevent pests, weeds and diseases. Organic farmers integrate enriching, involuntary, organic, and physical knowledge or understanding to manage weeds excluding the use of herbicides. In this study, farmers used neem extract, wood ash, palm bunch ash, predators, Hand picking of insects to control pests, weeds and diseases.

Herbicides are chemical substances use to destroy or inhibit the growth of weeds and other unnecessary plant pests (terrestrial or aquatic).  Examples are Dragon, Paraquat, Weed-off and Dazel.


Gender Mainstreaming is distinct because it is the method or practice by which men and women could evaluate the implications of any intended action, may be in the legislation, programmes or policies that concern them at all levels and areas of life undertaking United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO, (2015).

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.

Review


To Comment