EVALUATION OF THE SUSCEPTIBILITY PATTERN OF BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM POST OPERATIVE WOUNDS OF WOMEN WHO UNDER WENT CESEAREN SECTION AT FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTRE UMUAHIA, ABIA STATE

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00007098

No of Pages: 44

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

$12

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the bacterial isolates associated with post operative wound of women that underwent caeserean section and their susceptibility pattern to some antibiotics. Streak method of inoculation was adopted to isolate the associated bacteria and the disc diffusion method was used to test for the susceptibility pattern. Six bacteria isolates namely Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus specie, Klebsiella specie and Proteus specie were isolatedAmongst the six isolates, pseudomonas aeruginosa had the highest frequently of occurrence (29%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (24.4%), Klebsiella specie (19.5%) Escherichia coli (12%)in that order while the least was recorded against Proteus specie (49%).Among the gram positive bacteria, the high level of resistance was recorded with Streptococcus (80%) against penicillin followed by Staphylococcus aureus (70%) whiles the level of resistance was observed with Ampicillin (25%) against  Streptococcus specie. The high isolation rate of aerobic bacteria and their increased resistance to the commonly used antibiotics warrant s the need to practice aseptic procedures and rational use of antimicrobial agents leading to minimize infection rate and emergence of drug resistance.







TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page                                                                                                                    i

Certification                                                                                                                ii

Dedication                                                                                                                  iii

Acknowledgement                                                                                                      iv

Table of Contents                                                                                                       v

Lists of Tables                                                                                                             vii

Abstract                                                                                                                      viii

 

CHAPTER ONE

1.0        Introduction                                                                                                    1

1.1       Frequency of Infection                                                                                   3

1.2       Impact of Nosocomial Infections                                                                   3

1.3       Factors Influencing the Development of Nosocomial Infections                   4

1.3.1    The microbial agent                                                                                         4

1.3.2    Patient susceptibility                                                                                       5

1.3.3    Environmental factors                                                                                     6         

1.3.4    Bacterial resistance                                                                                         6

1.4       Aims and Objectives                                                                                       7

1.5       Objectives                                                                                                       8

 

CHAPTER TWO

2.0       Literature Review                                                                                           10

 

CHAPTER THREE

3.0       Materials and Methods                                                                                   17

3.1       Collection of Sample                                                                                      17

3.2       Media Used and Its Preparation                                                                     17

3.3       Sterilization                                                                                                     17

3.4       Isolation and Identification of Bacteria                                                         18

3.5       Identification of Bacterial Isolates                                                                 18

3.6       Gram Staining                                                                                                 18

3.7       Biochemical Cultural Characteristics                                                              19

3.7.1    Catalase Test                                                                                                   19                   

3.7.2    Coagulase test                                                                                                 19

3.7.3    Citrate test                                                                                                      19

3.7.4    Motility, indole, urease test (MIU).                                                                19

3.7.5    Triple sugar iron test                                                                                       20

3.7.6    Oxidase test                                                                                                    20

3.8       Antibiotic Sensitivity Testing                                                                         21

 

CHAPTER FOUR

4.0       Results                                                                                                            22

 

CHAPTER FIVE            

5.0       Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation                                                          27

5.1       Discussion                                                                                                       27

5.2       Conclusion                                                                                                      30

5.3       Recommendation                                                                                            30

References                                                                                                      31

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

LIST OF TABLES

 

 

Table                                      Title                                                                            page

 

1:         Biochemical and Cultural Characteristics of Bacteria Isolates

from Post Operative Wounds of Cesarean section                                         23

 

2:         Frequency of occurrence of Bacteria Isolates from

Post Operative Wound of Cesarean section                                                   24

 

3:         Percentage of Resistance in Gram Positive Isolates from 

Post-Operative Wounds of Cesarean section                                                 25

 

4:         Percentage Resistance in Gram Negative Isolates from

Post-Operative Wounds of Cesarean section                                                 26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                              CHAPTER ONE


1.0        INTRODUCTION 

Nosocomial infection is defined according to the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) as “a localized or systemic condition that results from adverse reaction to the presence of an infectious agents or its toxins  and that was not present or incubating at the time of admission to the hospital” (Abdel Rahman et al.,2010).

 The common definition of nosocomial infection is, an infection which occurs within 48 hours after hospitalization, or after 3 days from discharging, or 30 days from an operation. According to studies, the nosocomial infections are found mainly in intensive care units (ICU) compared other units of the hospital (Adegoke and Komolafe, 2008).

 These infections affect healthcare quality and cause many problems and they were identified more than a century ago. They account for about 5 – 10% of the cases admitted to hospitals for emergency care in the developed countries. It is the result of a chain of events influenced by the microbe involved, the transmission method, and patient’s adherence to physician’s instructions. The rate of nosocomial infection increases with administration of many treatment methods such as hemodialysis, respirators, urinary catheters and intravenous catheters (Agnihotri et al.,2004). In industrialized counties such as USA, comprehensive studies were carried out on nosocomial infections because of their devastating effect of patient mortality rate and money consuming treatments yearly. On the other hand, there are only few reports from developing countries, and rare premature studies from the Middle East. As reported by the WHO in 2001, nosocomial infection has the highest percentage in South-East Asia, and the Eastern Mediterranean and one of the main reasons for this has been the inadvertent misuse of antibiotics leading to widespread resistance (Bahar et al.,2010).

Nosocomial infections have become a very important public health issue and Staphylococcus aureus (SA) is one of several pathogens that have emerged as a major culprit. Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus appears to play a significant role in the epidemiology and pathogenesis of infections (Agwung-Fobellah,2007; Bahar, et al.,2010). Several studies have recognized hospital personnel as an important reservoir or healthy carriers (Armour et al.,2007).

Prevalence rates of 16.8% to 56.1% have been documented amongst this group . More so, that, hospital personnel often harbor more resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Retrospective studies have shown that over 20% of nasal isolates from hospital personnel exhibit multiple drug resistant and may be a significant reservoir for onward transmission to patients, who are more likely to be infected due to their weakened immune status (Alfred, 2007).

If the patient is immuno-compromised, microorganism that are not normally pathogenic, are capable of causing disease. Transmission of strains from hospital personnel to patients is usually by exogenous spread and occurs mostly during routine patient care (Anguzu, and Olila, 2007).

 These resistant strains when transmitted to patients, may complicate the latter’s treatment options particularly in resource-limited areas where antimicrobial susceptibility assessment is not systematic. Investigations of hospital-acquired outbreaks involving neonates and patients colonized with multi-drug resistance Staphylococcus aureus strain using typing demonstrated epidemiologically related strains between health personnel and the latter. Other studies have reported clear molecular and epidemiological evidence of Methicillin Resistance Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmission from health care workers to patients (Angyoet al.,2001). Hospitalized patients with Staphylococcus aureus infection have been shown to have five times the risk of in-hospital mortality compared with inpatients without this infection (Bach et al., 2002). 

Considering the relevance of Staphylococcus aureus as an important pathogen associated with nosocomial infections, the role played by hospital personnel in transmission, and the dearth in data on susceptibility patterns (CDC, 2009).

 

1.1       FREQUENCY OF INFECTION

Nosocomial infections occur worldwide and affect both developed and resource-poor countries. Infections acquired in health care settings are among the major causes of death and increased morbidity among hospitalized patients (Culver et al.,1991).

 They are a significant burden both for the patient and for public health. A prevalence survey conducted under the auspices of WHO in 55 hospitals of 14 countries representing 4 WHO Regions (Europe, Eastern Mediterranean, South-East Asia and Western Pacific) showed an average of 8.7% of hospital patients had nosocomial infections (Culver  et al.,1991).

At any time, over 1.4 million people worldwide suffer from infectious complications acquired in hospital. The highest frequencies of nosocomial infections were reported from hospitals in the Eastern Mediterranean and South-East Asia Regions (11.8 and 10.0% respectively), with a prevalence of 7.7 and 9.0% respectively in the European and Western Pacific Regions (Thomas  et al.,1998).

 

1.2       IMPACT OF NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS

Hospital-acquired infections add to functional disability and emotional stress of the patient and may, in some cases, lead to disabling conditions that reduce the quality of life. Nosocomial infections are also one of the leading causes of death (Thomas et al.,1998). The economic costs are considerable (Katz,2004). The increased length of stay for infected patients is the greatest contributor to cost.

One study (Katz,2004) showed that the overall increase in the duration of hospitalization for patients with surgical wound infections was 8.2 days, ranging from 3 days for gynaecology to 9.9 for general surgery and 19.8 for orthopedic surgery. Prolonged stay not only increases direct costs to patients or payers but also indirect costs due to lost work. The increased use of drugs, the need for isolation, and the use of additional laboratory and other diagnostic studies also contribute to costs (Giacometti et al.,2000).

Hospital-acquired infections add to the imbalance between resource allocation for primary and secondary health care by diverting scarce funds to the management of potentially preventable conditions. The advancing age of patients admitted to health care settings, the greater prevalence of chronic diseases among admitted patients, and the increased use of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures which affect the host defences will provide continuing pressure on nosocomial infections in the future (Holzheimeet al.,1990).

 Organisms causing nosocomial infections can be transmitted to the community through discharged patients, staff, and visitors. If organisms are multi resistant, they may cause significant disease in the community (Kleven, 2007).

 

1.3       FACTORS INFLUENCING THE DEVELOPMENT OF NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS

1.3.1    The Microbial Agent

The patient is exposed to a variety of microorganisms during hospitalization. Contact between the patient and a microorganism does not by itself necessarily result in the development of clinical disease   other factors influence the nature and frequency of nosocomial infections (Kleven,2007).

The likelihood of exposure leading to infection depends partly on the characteristics of the microorganisms, including resistance to antimicrobial agents, intrinsic virulence, and amount (inoculum) of infective material. Many different bacteria, viruses, fungi and parasites may cause nosocomial infections. Infections may be caused by a microorganism acquired from another person in the hospital (cross-infection) or may be  caused by the patient’s own flora (endogenous infection) (Ibrahim,2002).

Some organisms may be acquired from an inanimate object or substances recently contaminated from another human source (environmental infection). Before the introduction of basic hygienic practices and antibiotics into medical practice, most hospital infections were due to pathogens of external origin (food borne and airborne diseases, gas gangrene, tetanus, etc.) or were caused by microorganisms not present in the normal flora of the patients (e.g. diphtheria, tuberculosis) (Kirkland  et al.,1999).

Progress in the antibiotic treatment of bacterial infections has considerably reduced mortality from many infectious diseases. Most infections acquired in hospital today are caused by microorganisms which are common in the general population, in whom they cause no or milder disease than among hospital patients (Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, enterococci, Enterobacteriaceae) (Ibrahim,2002).

 

1.3.2    Patient Susceptibility

Important patient factors influencing acquisition of infection include age, immune status, underlying disease, and diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. The extremes of life infancy and old age  are associated with a decreased resistance to infection (Cowan and Steel,2000).

Patients with chronic disease such as malignant tumours, leukaemia, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, or the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) have an increased susceptibility to infections with opportunistic pathogens (Cowan and Steel,2000).

The latter are infections with organisms that are normally innocuous, e.g. part of the normal bacterial flora in the human, but may become pathogenic when the body’s immunological defences are compromised. Immunosuppressive drugs or irradiation may lower resistance to infection (Kardes,2007).

Injuries to skin or mucous membranes bypass natural defence mechanisms. Malnutrition is also a risk. Many modern diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, such as biopsies, endoscopic examinations, catheterization, intubation/ventilation and suction and surgical procedures increase the risk of infection (Giacometti et al.,2000).

Contaminated objects or substances maybe introduced directly into tissues or normally sterile sites such as the urinary tract and the lower respiratory tract (Ibrahim,2002)

 

1.3.4    Environmental Factors

Health care settings are an environment where both infected persons and persons at increased risk of infection congregate. Patients with infections or carriers of pathogenic microorganisms admitted to hospital are potential sources of infection for patients and staff. Patients who become infected in the hospital are a further source of infection (Bachet al., 2002).

 Crowded conditions within the hospital, frequent transfers of patients from one unit to another, and concentration of patients highly susceptible to infection in one area (e.g. newborn infants, burn patients, and intensive care) all contribute to the development of nosocomial infections. Microbial flora may contaminate objects, devices, and materials which subsequently contact susceptible body sites of patients. In addition, new infections associated with bacteria such as waterborne bacteria (atypical mycobacteria) and viruses and parasites continue to be identified (Bach et al., 2002)

 

1.3.5    Bacterial Resistance

Many patients receive antimicrobial drugs. Through selection and exchange of genetic resistance elements, antibiotics promote the emergence of multi drug resistant strains of bacteria; microorganisms in the normal human flora sensitive to the given drug are suppressed, while resistant strains persist and may become endemic in the hospital. The widespread use of antimicrobials for therapy or prophylaxis (including topical) is the major determinant of resistance (Bach et al., 2002). Antimicrobial agents are, in some cases, becoming less effective because of resistance. As an antimicrobial agent becomes widely used, bacteria resistant to this drug eventually emerge and may spread in the health care setting. Many strains of pneumococci, staphylococci, enterococci, and tuberculosis are currently resistant to most or all antimicrobials which were once effective. Multi resistant Klebsiella and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are prevalent in many hospitals. This problem is particularly critical in developing countries where more expensive second-line antibiotics may not be available or affordable (Thomas et al.,1998).

 

1.4       AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to assess the susceptibility pattern of pathogenic bacteria isolated from post operative wounds of women who underwent caesarean section.


1.5       OBJECTIVES

1. To isolate, identify, and characterize microorganisms isolated from post operative wounds of women who underwent caesarean section.

2. To determine pathogenic organisms that causes nosocomial infections.

3. To determine the susceptible pattern of organisms isolated from post operative wounds

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment