EFFECTS OF USE OF GEOBOARD ON ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND INTEREST OF PRIMARY SCHOOL PUPILS IN MATHEMATICS

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00007361

No of Pages: 170

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦5000

  • $

ABSTRACT

 

The study investigated the effects of use of geoboard on academic achievement and interest of primary school pupils in mathematics in Abia State, Nigeria. The study adopted a pretest, posttest quasi experimental design. The population of the study consisted of 17,230 primary six pupils made up of 8,833 males and 8,397 females. Two schools were purposively sampled out of 206 schools in Umuahia Education Zone of Abia State. Simple random sampling technique (toss of coin) was used in selecting the school that became experimental and control group as the study sampled a total of 92 pupils. 47 pupils made up the experimental group while the control group was made up of 45 pupils. The research was guided by four research questions and four hypotheses. Two validated researcher made instruments (Researcher Made Mathematics Achievement Test (RMMAT) and Mathematic Interest Scale (MIS)) with reliability coefficients of 0.63 and 0.67 respectively were used for data collection. The research questions were answered by descriptive statistics; mean and standard deviation while the hypotheses were tested using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) statistic at p         < 0.05 level of significance. The findings revealed a significant difference between the achievement and interest of the experimental group and control group in favour of the experimental group. It also revealed that there was no significant difference in academic achievement and interest of male and female pupils taught mathematics in the experimental group which imply that the use of geoboard is clearly independent of gender. Base on the findings, it was recommended that geoboard pupils handle themselves to construct mathematical concepts during learning of mathematics should be used in teaching mathematics especially in the area of basic plane shapes at primary school level. It was also recommended that professional bodies like Mathematics Association of Nigeria (MAN), Science Teachers Association of Nigeria (STAN) and research centers like Nigerian Educational Research and Development Council (NERDC) should incorporate the use of concrete instructional materials that give pupils participatory opportunity in the mathematics curriculum at prmary level of learning mathematics to encourage the use of concrete materials like geoboard and others in schools.






TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page                                                                                                                    i

Declaration                                                                                                                  ii

Certification                                                                                                                iii

Dedication                                                                                                                  iv

Acknowledgments                                                                                                      v

Table of Contents                                                                                                       vi

List of Tables                                                                                                              ix

Abstract                                                                                                                      xi

 

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION                                                             

1.1       Background of the Study                                                                               1

1.2       Statement of the Problem                                                                               12

1.3       Purpose of the Study                                                                                      13

1.4       Research Questions                                                                                         13

1.5       Research Hypotheses                                                                                      14

1.6       Significance of the Study                                                                               14

1.7       Scope of the Study                                                                                         16

 

CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE                                 

2.1       Conceptual Framework                                                                                   17

2.1.1    The concept of mathematics                                                                           17

2.1.2    The concept of instructional materials                                                            19

2.1.3    Impact of concrete materials in mathematics                                                  21

2.1.4    Geoboard on achievement and interest in geometry                                      23

2.1.5    Concept of academic achievement                                                                 24

2.1.6    Concept of interest                                                                                         26

2.1.7    State of mathematics achievement and interest in primary education            27

2.1.8    Current status of the teaching and learning of mathematics                          29

2.1.9    Concept of constructivism                                                                              32

2.2       Theoretical Framework                                                                                   38

2.3       Related Empirical Studies                                                                              48

2.3.1    Achievement in mathematics-some approaches that have been                     48

adopted 

2.3.2    Related studies in use of instructional material on academic achievement

and interest                                                                

2.3.3    Gender differences in mathematics achievement                                           54

2.3.4    Interest as a factor in academic achievement                                                 58

2.4       Summary of the Related Literature                                                                60

 

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY                         

 

3.1       Design of the Study                                                                                        63

3.2       Area of the Study                                                                                           64

3.3       Population of the Study                                                                                  64

3.4       Sample and Sampling Technique                                                                    65

3.5       Instrumentation for Data Collection                                                               65

3.6       Validity of the Instrument                                                                              66

3.7       Reliability of the Instruments                                                                                     66

3.8       Method of Data Collection                                                                             67

3.8.1    Experimental procedure                                                                                  68

3.9       Control of Extraneous Variable                                                                     68

3.10     Method of Data Analysis                                                                              70

 

 

 

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1       Results                                                                                                            71

4.1.1    Research question one                                                                                    71

4.1.2    Research question two                                                                                    72

4.1.3    Research question three                                                                                  72

4.1.4    Research question four                                                                                   73

4.1.5    Hypothesis one                                                                                               74

4.1.6    Hypothesis two                                                                                               75

4.1.7    Hypothesis three                                                                                             76

4.1.8    Hypothesis four                                                                                              77

4.2       Major Findings of the Study                                                                          78

4.3       Discussion of Results                                                                                      79

 

CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1       Conclusion                                                                                                      83

5.2       Recommendations                                                                                          83

5.3       Educational Implication of the Study                                                            85

5.4       Limitation of the Study                                                                                  86

5.5       Suggestion for Future Studies                                                                                    86

5.6       Summary of the Study                                                                                    87

          References                                                                                                     Appendices





 

LIST OF TABLES

4.1:      The mean achievement scores of pupils taught mathematics using

geoboard and those taught without using geoboard.                                     71                                                                   

4.2:      The mean interest scores of pupils taught mathematics using geoboard

and those taught without the use of geoboard.                                              72

 

4.3:      The mean achievement scores of male and female pupils taught

mathematics using geoboard.                                                                          73

 

4.4:      The mean interest scores of male and female pupils taught mathematics

using geoboard.                                                                                               73                                                                   

4.5       Analysis of covariance on the mean achievement scores of pupils taught

using geoboard and those taught without using geoboard.                            74

 

4.6       Analysis of covariance on the mean interest scores of pupils taught

mathematics using geoboard and those taught without using geoboard.       75                   

4.7       Analysis of covariance on the mean achievement scores of male and

female pupils taught mathematics using geoboard.                                        76

 

4.8       Analysis of covariance on the mean interest scores of male and female

pupils taught mathematics using geoboard.                                                    77


 





CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

 

1.1       BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY

Mathematics is the study of relationships and patterns which can be expressed in symbolic form. It embraces many important ideas about numbers and space which involves problem solving activities and a very powerful way of communication. The study of mathematics as a subject began in the 6th century BC with the Pythagoreans, who coined the term “mathematics” from the ancient Greek word (mathema), meaning “subject of instruction”. During Renaissance of 16th century in Italy, new mathematical developments interacting with new scientific discoveries were made at an increasing pace that continued through the present day (Kalu, 2015).

 

The place of mathematics in the life of any nation cannot be overemphasized because it is linked with the place of development in that nation. According to Eze(2016), mathematics plays a key role in national progress; and even the employment prospects of its citizens are highly dependent on their level of mathematical knowledge. In Nigerian National policy on education, mathematics is one of the core subjects to be offered by all pupils and students at primary and secondary levels of education (FGN, 2013). The compulsory nature of mathematics carries with it the assumption that the knowledge of the subject is essential for all members of the society.

 

As a subject, mathematics affects all aspects of human life in different levels. Generally, its study is considered as basis for the preparation of every informed citizen of any nation and serves as determinant in numerous career choices in life (Eze, 2016). It is important in studying and understanding Science and Technology. Science, technology and mathematics education have been widely acclaimed to be index of determining any nation’s socio-economic and geo-political development (Mamman & Isa, 2018). In-spite of so much importance attached to the knowledge of mathematics, teaching and learning of mathematics have continued to attract varied views among learners, teachers, mathematics educators, parents among others (Eze, 2016).  

 

Observations and reports from examining bodies (First School Living Certificate (FSLC), Ministries of Educations both at state and Federal levels) revealed that a high percentage of primary school pupils continue to perform poorly in mathematics examinations, which may be as a result of their distaste for mathematics as a subject (Alio & Okafor, 2018). This poor performance has been generating much concern among parents, teachers, students and other stakeholders in the education business. Growing distaste for mathematics by pupils in schools, which is a major factor in pupils’ poor performance in mathematics is attaining serious dimension. If the situation is not brought to a halt, the result may ultimately prove injurious to our future scientific and economic development (Emaikwu, 2012, Surajudeen, 2013 and Amadi & Arokoyu, 2017). Most secondary school students view mathematics as a problematic and abstract subject, which is as a result of difficulty in understanding, assimilating and retaining its content taught to them in the classroom (Ahmad, 2016). Report from the West African Examination Council examiners (WAEC, 2017) revealed that some of the problems encountered by learners in understanding mathematical concepts are as a result of their inability to understand mathematical processes which is associated with the ways it is being taught in the classroom.

 

Although efforts are being made by government, researchers, mathematicians, mathematics educators, Mathematical Association of Nigeria (MAN) and Science Teachers Association of Nigeria (STAN) to improve mathematics education in Nigeria. Achievement and interest in the subject have continued to be poor year after year (Eze, 2016). A number of factors have been found to have contributed to pupils’ poor achievement and interest in mathematics at primary school level of education. Some of these factors are lack of well trained mathematics teachers (Emaikwu & Nworgu, 2005); ineffectiveness of teacher on content delivery (Emaikwu, 2012); poor students’ mathematics comprehensive reading skills (Onah, 2012); students poor study habits (Kalu, 2015); students low interest towards mathematics as school subject (Amadi & Arokoyu 2018); and inability of linking mathematical concept to real life application through the use of concrete instructional materials (Durojaiye, 2018). To sum it all, Gambari (2010) stressed that most mathematics teachers at primary and secondary schools do not use teaching aids, and in most cases they stick to only conventional method of teaching, thereby doing most of the talking and leaving the students as passive listeners. 

 

Considering the pedagogical problems as stressed by Gambari (2010) and others, one may observe that, in some of the primary schools in Nigeria today, in spite of the much talked-about modern teaching approaches that are learner centered, the traditional classroom approach still prevails especially in teaching of mathematics. Classroom teacher still control instructional process in mathematics classes, the content are still delivered to the entire class with little or no contribution from learners and relevance of mathematical contents to learners are still weak. Reports from researchers have shown that learning and understanding of school subjects especially mathematics at primary and secondary school levels of education have been frustrated by clumsy methods of teaching (Gambari, 2010, Emaikwu, 2012) and inability of using instructional materials that gives the learner the opportunity to handle and represent concepts in real life situation (Durojaiye, 2018, Charlce-Ogan & Amadi, 2017) during teaching learning process.

The National Mathematical Centre, Abuja (NMC, 2009) in an attempt to revamp mathematics teaching and learning at primary and secondary school levels, successfully researched into the causes of mass failure in mathematics and revealed among other factors, teachers’ inability to use instructional materials during teaching of mathematical concepts as a major factor. At times, the materials  are not adequately available, even the available ones are not properly utilized due to the fact that some teachers are not knowledgeable enough in handling some of the equipments. The inability of classroom teachers to use instructional materials in teaching different subjects in primary school (which is the foundational stage of education) have had a negative impact on the side of the learners (Mkpa, 2017). The negative impact have created the need for teachers to provide activities which will help the child at primary stage of education develop intellectually through the use of those approaches that will arouse` their interest and give them participatory opportunities since education has become wide spread and as such, exclusive oral teaching cannot be the key to successful pedagogy. Construction and usage of instructional materials in concrete form that learners can handle during learning process may therefore play a crucial role in teaching and learning of mathematical concepts especially at primary school level which is the foundational level of education system.

 

 

Mathematics being the basic foundation for economic and technological development requires solid foundation at primary stage of education (FGN 2013). It is a well known fact that sound educational foundation is the base for effective economic and technological take off of any nation. Primary education is given in schools for children 6-12 years and above. Since the rest of education system is built upon it, primary level of education is the key to success or failure of the other levels of education. Primary education creates opportunity for each child to acquire a basic education which will enable him function efficiently and creatively in his environment (Nwachukwu, 2004). Teaching at this level of education requires the engagement of well trained teachers who will develop pupils with the required knowledge to attain national educational objectives, especially in the area of economic and scientific development.

 

Nigerian National Policy on Education emphasized that primary education should lay a sound basis for economic, scientific and reflective thinking as well as provide the child with basic tools for further educational advancement including preparation for trades and crafts of the locality. Laudable achievement in economic and technological development can never be met if the potential scientists, engineers and technologists are not equipped with sound knowledge of mathematics at primary level of education; it is the Nigerian child’s stepping-stone which will serve as a spring board to acquisition of higher mathematical skills required for economic and scientific relevance. Equipping learners with tools needed to investigate, inquire, think, conclude and to be mathematically confident in this highly competitive economic and technological world starts from the primary school (FRN, 2013).

 

Developing mathematical ability of the pupils entails addressing the teaching process in mathematics. Doing this will require a sustained long-term commitment from teachers who will engage in active learner-centered instructional practices that will provide academically challenging experiences for all pupils irrespective of their ability, motivation and academic track (Onyeka & Charles-Ogan 2018). At primary level of education, construction and usage of concrete materials designed to arouse the interest of pupils and as well improve their performance towards the learning of science related subjects including mathematics may play important role in learning of subjects. This is in line with constructivist ideology of learning as well as one of the stages of Jean Piaget’s Theories of cognitive development called “concrete operational stage”.

 

In Piaget’s “Concrete operational developmental stage for children 7-11years” which falls within the age of primary school pupils, he found that children are able to learn and solve problems in logical fashion through the use of concrete materials in their environment and that the use of active methods (hands-on materials) which gives scope to spontaneous research by the child helps her/him rediscover or reconstruct what is to be learned "not simply imparted to him" (Neboh, 2015). They understand the laws of conservation and are able to classify and seriate what they learnt through the use of concrete materials they handle.

 

The use of concrete materials that children handle during teaching and learning at the primary school level may help learners to explore, experiment, create and interact with their environment intensively. This appears to suggest that it can improve thinking skills of children through improved spatial visualization skills using hands-on learning which can help them learn concepts that may otherwise be rather abstract. This is in line with one of the goals of Nigerian National Policy on Education that states that “Education at primary level should give the child opportunities for developing manipulative skills that will enable the child function effectively in the society within the limits of the child’s capacity”. To achieve this may require the use of concrete instructional aids which are designed to give learners participatory opportunity and develop their manipulative skills during teaching learning process.

Seeing, touching and listening are characteristics of instructional materials for human learning in this 21st century. Aramide and Bolarinwe (2010) in their opinion said that, instructional materials in concrete forms have the potential for enhancing pupils learning. Concrete instructional materials as the name implies are aids which are used by the teacher to help him/her communicate his/her ideas to the pupils in order to increase understanding of the subject content. Its role in teaching and learning is one of the most important and widely discussed issues in contemporary education policy. Mathematical concrete instructional materials(such as geoboard, geometric rods, algebra tiles, place value blocks, pattern blocks, tiles, cubes and many more)  are designed to assist learners in making connections between abstract mathematical concepts and its real world applications. No wonder since sixties till date, the use of concrete materials that children handle during learning was often justified on the basis of this ancient Chinese proverb:

I hear and I forget

I see and I remember

I do and I understand.

 

Mathematics as one of the subjects that requires instructional materials for its teaching and learning is divided into Arithmetic, Algebra, Statistics and Geometry at primary school level.

 

Geometry is a branch of mathematics that deals with the study of shape, size and the property of space. The relevance of geometry in life has awarded it a central place in all mathematics curriculums. It has become the fulcrum on which major scientific and technological innovations hinge. Geometry is used by many in various fields. The engineers use the knowledge of geometry to design and build houses and also to construct bridges and roads. Geometry is also important in learning other branches of Mathematics like number and numeration and introductory calculus. Students or learners who are good at geometry have potential abilities to solve many of the societal problems whether social, economic, technological and so on. According to Steven in Prakash (2013), in early civilization of Babylonians and Egyptians geometrical concepts were used in everyday lives to do many things like; building structures such as the pyramids, plot square corners of fields and so on. Its knowledge helps a child in the development of aesthetics around his environment as well as inductive reasoning skills.

 

Geometry is taught in schools right from primary to the tertiary level (Yosoff, 2013). Owing to the aforementioned, it is obvious that the importance of geometry in everyday life cannot be over emphasized. It is because of this importance that geometry is included as one of the core topics in primary and secondary school mathematics curriculum. Because of wide applications of Geometry in abstract reasoning, geometric question seems to be extensively emphasized in school curriculum (Yosoff, 2013).

 

Despite the importance of this branch of mathematics, Telina (2016) observed that geometry is one aspect of mathematics that is mostly dreaded by students. The researcher added that, it is an area of mathematics where students find difficult to learn and understand and have led to low achievement and interest in mathematics. In the same vein, a close analysis of the past First School Leaving Certificate Examination (FSLCE) and Senior Secondary Certificate Examination questions revealed that geometric questions have dominated for more than 10years now (Telina, 2016). To emphasize on this point the researcher found that, the West African Senior Secondary Certificate Examination chief examiner’s report (WASSCE 2015) revealed that errors students commit in answering geometric questions have been responsible for the mass failure of students in Senior School Certificate mathematics examination. The above report is clear indication that achievement and interest of learners in mathematics in area of geometry have not been encouraging.

 

However, geometry is the branch of mathematics in which visualization is one of the most essential elements for understanding its definitions and theorems, as well as solving the given tasks and problems. It is one of the mathematical concepts that mostly require concrete materials such as geoboard for its teaching and learning at primary level of education. Geoboards were invented by an English mathematician, Caleb Gattegno (1911 – 1988). The geoboard was designed as manipulative (hands on) tool for teaching geometry in schools, (Williams, 1999). As a learning tool, it provides a means to act upon it and can be used as cognitive scaffold that facilitates the extension of knowledge (Salomon & Perkins in Mclnerneyn & Mclnerney, 2009). Through using geoboards, students cannot only work towards space and geometric outcomes but also be engaged in working mathematically (board of studies New South Wales, 2002). Geoboard is versatile and can be used at all levels for teaching and learning about different areas (geometry, algebra among others) in mathematics.

 

Teaching of geometry with concrete instructional materials such as geoboard at primary school level of education may help in building strong mathematical foundation which will foster easy understanding of the basic facts such as angles, plane shapes, lines, line segments, curves in geometric figures (plane shapes) and may also helps in understanding the basic facts about geometric transformation such as reflection, rotation and translation. It then means that, for geometry to be effectively communicated there is need to apply teaching aids in concrete forms that will assist the teacher in making connection between its abstract nature and real life application. When the pupils use and interact with such concrete instructional materials like geoboard and interact with one another, learning may become interesting and achievement enhanced.

 

Achievement according to new Webster’s dictionary (2016), means to reach a required standard of performance, or to carry out a task successfully. In the context of this study, achievement refers to cognitive achievement of students which is measured in terms of passes in teacher-made test/standardized test in mathematics. It involves the determination of the degree of performance and attainment of individuals in tasks, courses or programmes to which the individuals were sufficiently exposed. Hence, the researcher upholds the view that, student’s academic achievement entails successful academic progress attained through effort and skill (Okpala, 2015). The academic achievement of primary school pupils in mathematics have not been encouraging (Alio and Okafor 2018). The persistent poor achievement and continuous show of low interest by pupils and students in mathematics makes it paramount to seek for other alternative strategies for teaching the subject so as to improve their understanding, achievement and interest.

 

Interest according to Imoko and Agwagah (2006) is a subjective feeling of concentration or persisting tendency to pay attention and enjoy some activities or content. It is the feeling of intentness, concern or curiosity about an object (Obodo in Alio and Okafor 2018). It can also be regarded as the condition of being eager to know or learn about something. Interest is an important variable in teaching and learning of mathematics. This is because when a pupil becomes interested in an activity, he/she is likely to be more deeply involved in that activity. Okigbo and Okeke (2011) noted that a child may be intellectually and physically capable to learn, but he/she may never learn until his/her interest is stimulated. Once the interests of learners are stimulated, they will continue to learn as long as their teacher is capable of sustaining their interest in the subject matter. Okigbo and Okeke (2011) also exposed that interest is a mother of attention, and once there is direct interest, attention is guaranteed and learning is assured. Obodo (2004) stated that one way of generating students’ interest in mathematics is by relating mathematics to real life. This is why Iji, Ogbole and Uka, (2014) stated that it is mandatory for mathematicians and mathematics educators to continually evolve adequate and appropriate strategies of inculcating the knowledge of mathematics into the present and generations yet unborn. Therefore, mathematic teachers are saddled with the responsibility of making mathematics as realistic as possible through the use of concrete instructional materials such as geoboard which are designed to help teachers give learners participatory opportunity during teaching of mathematical concepts irrespective of their ability or gender.

 

Studies earlier conducted reported that boys have more interest and performed better than girls in mathematics (Asante, 2010). However, some literature search reported that female students performed better than male students exposed to mathematics tests (Sambo 2015 and Unodiaku, 2015). No significant difference in mathematics achievement and interest between males and female students were also reported (Ogbonna, 2007, and Unodiaku, 2013). These inconsistency reports on males and females superiority in mathematics achievement and interest appear inconclusive. This study is aimed at clarifying these notions.

 

In as much as all science and technology based courses and programmes are highly dependent on mathematics, and geometry playing a vital role in human existence, efforts should be made towards the development of learning activities that will engage learners during teaching and learning of mathematical concept at all levels of education, in order to improve academic achievement and interest among learners in the subject irrespective of their gender among other factors. Hence, the need to investigate the effects of use of geoboard on academic achievement and interest of primary school pupils in mathematics.

 

1.2       STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Mathematics education has become the engine room of science and technology as well plays important role in every nation’s economic and technological development. However, there is evidence of poor achievement and interest amongst pupils and students in mathematics as revealed by various research works and literatures (Gambari, 2010, Durojaiye, 2018, Emaikwu, 2012) especially in area of geometric concept whose applications cut across almost all areas of human endeavor. Many pupils and students find it difficult in understanding mathematical concepts at primary and secondary school levels due to the way its contents are being delivered to them by mathematics teacher especially in area of geometry. Poor presentation of geometric concept by some teachers coupled with low interest of students towards Mathematics as a subject has led to their poor achievement both in internal and external examinations which is evidenced in Chief Examiner’s WAEC report (2015).

 

Various attempts have been made to solve the challenges faced by pupils and students in understanding mathematical concepts, but the problem still persists. Researches by Gambari, (2010) and Durojaiye, (2018) have shown that among the causes of poor academic achievement and interest of learners in various subjects, especially in Mathematics, teachers’ effectiveness in the use of instructional materials is of most important influence. This is against the ideology of Jean Piaget whose major work on cognitive developmental stages of learning, made us to understand that at the foundational stage of learning, concretizing what is to be learnt helps a child in acquisition of knowledge. The researcher therefore tend to find out if using geoboard (a concrete instructional material that gives learners participatory opportunity) will have any significant effect on primary school pupils’ academic achievement and interest in mathematics which is the foundational level of education system. Hence, important question for which answers is sought in this study is: what are the effects of using geoboard on academic achievement and interest of primary school pupils in mathematics?

 

1.3       PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The general purpose of this study was to examine the effects of using Geoboard on academic achievement and interest of primary school pupils in mathematics.

Specifically, the study seeks to:

i.           determine the effect of using Geoboard on academic achievement of pupils in mathematics;

ii.         determine the effect of using geoboard on the interest of pupils in mathematics;

iii.       determine the differential effect of using Geoboard on academic achievement of male and   female pupils in mathematics;

iv.       determine the differential effect of using Geoboard on interest of male and female pupils in mathematics;

 

1.4       RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The following research questions were posed to give direction to the study:

1. What are the mean achievement scores of pupils taught mathematics in experimental group and control group?

2. What are the mean interest scores of pupils taught mathematics in experimental group and control group?

3. What are the mean achievement scores of male and female pupils taught mathematics in experimental group?

4. What are the mean interest scores of male and female pupils taught mathematics in experimental group?

 

1.5       HYPOTHESES

The following null hypotheses (H0) were tested at 0.05 level of significant in the study:

HO1            There is no significant difference between the mean achievement scores of pupils taught mathematics in experimental group and control group.

HO2                There is no significant difference between the mean interest scores of pupils taught mathematics in experimental group and control group.

HO3            There is no significant difference between the mean achievement scores of male and female pupils taught mathematics in experimental group.

HO4                There is no significant difference between the mean interest scores of male and female pupils taught mathematics in experimental group.

 

1.6       SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

The findings of this study when published may be of great benefit to teachers, Pupils, authors, researchers, government and school administrators.

If the result of this study shows that the use of geoboard in teaching mathematics at primary level of education enhances pupil’s achievement as well increases interest in mathematics, it would then motivate teachers to use concrete instructional materials that gives pupils participatory opportunity in teaching mathematics.

 

The outcome of the study may help pupils in understanding the impact of geoboard and other concrete instructional materials on their academic achievement and interest in mathematics and also help them in understanding relevance of mathematical knowledge and its applications in their environment. This study would reveal to the pupils/students the various interesting activities they should be involved in while studying mathematical concepts especially in geometry. This could stimulate and retain their interest in the subject. The findings of the study would also equip pupils/students with better and adequate knowledge of how best to study mathematical concepts. From the findings of this study the pupils/students would learn to make better use of their leisure times by engaging in useful mathematical activities.

 

Specifically the findings of the study would among other things, specify the type of activities that are learner-centered and of interest to pupils/students, of which if included in the textbooks they use, it will make such textbooks more beneficial to learners. Based on the findings, workshops and seminars on how to use concrete instructional materials in teaching different topics in mathematics to enhance better performance in the subject could then be sponsored and organized by government and relevant professional bodies.

 

The outcome of the result would likely motivate school administrators, school authorities, heads of schools and government to appreciate the relevance concrete instructional material in teaching and learning of mathematics and ensure that the materials are made available for teaching of any mathematical concepts.

 

Finally if the present study establishes the efficacy of using geoboard in enhancing students’ interest and achievement in mathematics, then the result could trigger off more researches and innovations in mathematics teaching especially on areas not covered during the present study. Future researchers who might wish to conduct research in some areas related to the present study may benefit from the findings of the study which will serve as reference material.  

 

1.7       SCOPE OF THE STUDY

The study was delimited to primary six pupils in Abia State, Nigeria. Primary six pupils were used for the study because of their level of understanding and exposure in primary school mathematics curriculum on the area of the topic to be covered during the present study. 

This study focused on examining the effects of Geoboard on academic achievement and interest in geometry at primary level of education. In terms of contents coverage, the researcher selected from a unit in mathematics curriculum of Abia State Universal Basic Education Board for primary school mathematics (ASUBEB, 2018). The content scope includes the following.

 

1.      Basic plane shapes and its properties (square, rectangle, and triangle).

2.      Perimeter of basic plane shapes (square, rectangle, and triangle).

3.      Area of basic plane shapes (square, rectangle, and triangle).

4.      Properties, circumference (perimeter) and area of a circle.


Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment