ABSTRACT
This study investigated the effectiveness of three commonly used household disinfectants—Dettol, Izal, and Hypo—against Staphylococcus aureus isolated from household surfaces. The experiment employed the agar well diffusion method to determine the antimicrobial activity of the disinfectants at different concentrations. Staphylococcus aureus was isolated and identified using Mannitol Salt Agar and Gram staining techniques. Results revealed that all disinfectants showed inhibitory effects on S. aureus, with Hypo (sodium hypochlorite) exhibiting the highest mean inhibition zone (30.0 ± 1.0 mm) at 1% concentration, followed by Dettol (26.0 ± 1.0 mm) and Izal (21.0 ± 1.0 mm) at 5% concentration. The statistical analysis (ANOVA) indicated a significant difference (p < 0.05) among the disinfectants tested. The findings showed that the effectiveness of disinfectants increases with concentration and that Hypo is the most effective against S. aureus. The study concludes that regular use of effective disinfectants, particularly chlorine-based agents like Hypo, plays a vital role in minimizing bacterial contamination and enhancing domestic hygiene. It recommends the use of appropriate concentrations and contact times for safe and efficient disinfection of household surfaces.
Keywords: Disinfectants, Dettol, Izal, Hypo, Staphylococcus aureus, Antimicrobial activity, Household hygiene.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
Declaration
Certification
Approval Page
Dedication
Acknowledgement
Abstract
Table of Contents
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
1.2 Statement of the Problem
1.3 Aim of the Study
1.4 Objectives of the Study
1.5 Research Questions
1.6 Significance of the Study
1.7 Scope and Delimitation of the Study
1.8 Justification of the Study
1.9 Operational Definition of Terms
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Overview of Disinfection and Disinfectants
2.3 Classification of Disinfectants
2.4 Mechanism of Action of Disinfectants
2.5 Staphylococcus aureus: Morphology and
Characteristics
2.6 Factors Affecting Effectiveness of Disinfectants
2.7 Review of Related Studies
2.8 Summary of Literature Review
CHAPTER THREE: MATERIALS AND METHODS
3.1 Research Design
3.2 Study Area
3.3 Sample Collection and Handling
3.4 Materials and Equipment
3.5 Preparation of Culture Media
3.6 Isolation and Identification of S. aureus
3.7 Disinfectants and Their Concentrations
3.8 Experimental Procedure
3.9 Data Collection
3.10 Data Analysis
CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Results
4.2 Discussion
4.3 Conclusion
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION, AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Summary
5.2 Conclusion
5.3 Recommendations
5.4 Suggestions for Future Work
5.5 Contributions to Knowledge
References
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background of the Study
Bacteria are ubiquitous
microorganisms that inhabit various environments, including household surfaces.
While many bacteria are harmless or even beneficial, some species are
pathogenic and capable of causing diseases when they come into contact with
humans, food, or open wounds. Common household bacteria such as Staphylococcus
aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa can be transmitted through
contaminated surfaces, utensils, and hands, leading to infections ranging from
mild skin irritations to severe gastrointestinal and respiratory illnesses
(LeChevallier and Au, 2004). The use of disinfectants is a common and effective
strategy to control bacterial contamination in domestic environments.
Disinfectants are chemical agents specifically formulated to kill or inhibit
the growth of microorganisms on inanimate surfaces. They include chlorine-based
compounds, alcohols, phenolics, quaternary ammonium compounds, and hydrogen
peroxide, each with unique mechanisms of action (McDonnell and Russell, 1999).
In households, surfaces
such as kitchen counters, bathroom sinks, doorknobs, and floors can harbor
diverse bacterial populations due to frequent human contact and exposure to
organic matter. Regular cleaning with disinfectants significantly reduces the microbial
load, thereby minimizing the risk of infections. However, the efficacy of a
disinfectant depends on several factors, including concentration, contact time,
type of microorganism, and presence of organic matter (Rutala and Weber, 2016).
With the growing concern
about microbial resistance and the potential health risks of ineffective
cleaning, it is essential to evaluate the effectiveness of commonly used
disinfectants on household bacteria. Such studies help consumers make informed
decisions about safe and efficient cleaning practices.
1.2
Statement of the Problem
Despite widespread use,
not all disinfectants are equally effective against household bacteria.
Inappropriate selection or improper use of these agents may lead to incomplete
eradication of bacteria, which can contribute to microbial resistance and
persistent contamination. Furthermore, the market is saturated with various
disinfectant brands claiming high efficiency, but without standardized
household-based testing, their actual performance remains uncertain. This
creates a knowledge gap regarding the comparative effectiveness of
disinfectants commonly available to consumers.
1.3
Aim of the Study
The aim of this study is
to determine the effect of some disinfectants on Staphylococcus aureus isolated
from household surfaces.
1.4
Objectives of the Study
The specific objectives
were to:
i.
isolate Staphylococcus
aureus present on household
surfaces.
ii.
determine the effects
of Dettol , Izal and Hypo against
Staphylococcus.
iii.
compare the effects of the three selected disinfectantson
S. aureus
1.5
Research Questions
i.
How effective are
selected disinfectants in inhibiting the growth of these bacteria?
ii.
Can we isolate S. aureus from household surfaces?
iii.
Which disinfectant demonstrates
the highest antimicrobial activity?
1.6
Significance of the Study
This study Provides
scientific data on the effectiveness of commonly used household disinfectants.
Help households choose
appropriate disinfectants for maximum hygiene.
Contribute to public
health by promoting practices that reduce the spread of pathogenic bacteria.
Serve as a reference for
future studies on antimicrobial resistance and household sanitation.
1.7
Scope and Delimitation of the Study
The study focused on bacterial isolates obtained from
common household surfaces such as kitchen sinks, toilet seats, door handles,
and countertops. Only three selected available disinfectants were tested, and
the study limited to bacterial; viruses and fungi not considered.
1.8
Justification of the Study
With increased awareness
about hygiene, especially in the post-COVID-19 era, disinfectant use has become
a routine practice. However, without evidence-based data on their effectiveness
against specific household bacteria, users may waste resources or fail to
achieve proper sanitation. This research addresses the need for empirical
testing of disinfectants to ensure safety and efficiency in domestic
environments.
Login To Comment