EFFECT OF ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT ON ENTREPRENEURIAL GROWTH (A STUDY OF AGRO-BASED INDUSTRIES)

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00007631

No of Pages: 93

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦5000

  • $

ABSTRACT

The main objective of this study was to show the effect of economic empowerment on the entrepreneurship growth in Abia State. The specific objectives of the study were to: analyze the effect of empowerment in skills on entrepreneurial competency of the agro-based entrepreneurs in Abia State; ascertain the effect of empowerment in capital/finance on entrepreneurial capacity of the agro-based entrepreneurs; determine the effect of technological empowerment on entrepreneurial capability of the agro-based entrepreneurs; and to analyze the effect of academic empowerment on entrepreneurial capacity of the agro-based entrepreneurs. The study adopted a survey research method. The population of this study was made up of the management staff of the selected firms in Aba metropolis and was 931. The Taro Yahmane formula for sample size determination was used to select a sample size of 280 respondents for the study. The data collected for the study were analyzed based on the stated objectives of the study using statistical data entry form designed in Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software. Findings revealed that skills empowerment was found to exert significant effect on entrepreneurial competency of the agro-based entrepreneurs in Abia State. This implies that the higher entrepreneurs are empowered with skills, the higher their entrepreneurial competency in Abia State.  Also, financial empowerment was found to exert significant effect on entrepreneurial capacity of the agro-based entrepreneurs in Abia State. This indicates that the higher the application of financial empowerment, the higher the entrepreneurial capacity of the agro-based entrepreneurs in Abia State. It was also revealed in the study that technological empowerment was found in the study to exert significant and positive effect on entrepreneurial capability of the agro-based entrepreneurs in Abia State. The study recommended that government’s empowerment programmes should be restructured, or re-designed, and should be centred on the “participatory approach”. This approach emphasizes the importance of involving the beneficiaries in all stages of the programme. There should be greater investment on the human capital investment of youths. This implies that improvement in education, health and nutrition, employment opportunities, shelter and social services, directly address the most important problem of poverty and reduces crime among the youth.






TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page                                                                                                                                i

Declaration                                                                                                                             ii

Certification                                                                                                                            iii

Dedication                                                                                                                              iv

Acknowledgement                                                                                                                  v

Table of Contents                                                                                                                   vi

Abstract                                                                                                                                  vii

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the study                                                                                                   1

1.2 Statement of the Problem                                                                                                 5

1.3 Objectives of the Study                                                                                                    6

1.4 Research Questions                                                                                                          7

1.5 Statement of Hypothesis                                                                                                   7

1.6 Significance of the Study                                                                                                 8

1.7 Scope of the Study                                                                                                            9

1.8 Limitations of the Study                                                                                                   9

1.9   Profiles of the Firms Under Study                                                                                  10

1.9.1 Valleumbra Flour Mills Ltd                                                                                           10

1.9.2 Livestock feeds limited, Aba                                                                                         12

1.9.3 PZ Wilmar                                                                                                                     15

1.10   Operational Definition of Terms                                                                                  17

CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF RELATED STUDY

2.1 Conceptual Framework                                                                                                    18

2.1.1 The concept of entrepreneurship                                                                                   18

2.1.2 The entrepreneur                                                                                                           20

2.1.3 The concept of empowerment                                                                                       22

2.1.4 Entrepreneurship and economic development                                                              26

2.1.5 Entrepreneurial capacity                                                                                               35

2.1.6 Entrepreneurial competence development                                                                    37

2.1.7 Economic empowerment and SMEs success in Nigeria                                               40

2.1.8 Economic factors affecting agro-based SMEs in Nigeria                                             41

2.2 Theoretical Framework                                                                                                    43

2.2.1 Marshall’s approach to entrepreneurship (Marshall, 1949)                                          43

2.2.2 Kirzner's "alert" entrepreneur (Kirzner, 1997)                                                              43

2.2.3 Schumpeter (1999): the discovery and opportunity theory of                                       45

            entrepreneurship (equilibrium destruction theory)

 

2.2.4 Knight’s Approach (Knight, 1971)                                                                                46

2.3 Empirical Review                                                                                                             46

2.4 Summary of Literature Review                                                                                        49

2.5 Gap in Literature                                                                                                              50

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY

3.1 Research Design                                                                                                               52

3.2 Sources of Data                                                                                                                 52

3.3 Population of the Study                                                                                                    53

3.4 Sample size Determination                                                                                              53

3.5 Sampling Procedure                                                                                                         54

3.6 Description of the Instrument                                                                                           54

3.7. Validity of Instrument                                                                                                     55

3.8 Reliability of the Instrument                                                                                            55

3.9 Method of Data Analysis                                                                                                  55

3.10 Model Specification                                                                                                       55

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

4.1     Data Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation                                                                        57

4.1.1. Questionnaire distribution                                                                                                        57

4.2     Test of Hypotheses                                                                                                       62

CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1       Summary of Findings                                                                                                 67

5.2       Conclusion                                                                                                                              68

5.3       Recommendations                                                                                                      69

5.3       Areas for Further Studies                                                                                                       70

             References                                                                                                                             72

            Appendices                                                                                                                 79

 

 

 




 

LIST OF TABLES

                                                                                                                                                Page

3.1 Population distribution for the number of staff of the 3 selected

            firms in Aba, Abia State                                                                                 53

 

4.1.   Distribution and return of questionnaire                                                                       57

 

4.2.   Frequency distribution showing responses on the forms

         of economic empowerment                                                                               57

 

4.3.  Descriptive statistics showing responses on the extent to

        which economic empowerment boosts entrepreneurial competency                         58

 

4.4.  Descriptive statistics showing responses on the extent to economic

        empowerment increases entrepreneurial capacity                                              59

 

4.5.  Descriptive statistics showing responses on the extent to

        which economic empowerment increases entrepreneurial capability                         59

 

4.6.   Descriptive statistics showing responses on the extent to which

         empowerment in skills affect entrepreneurial competency                                           60

 

4.7.   Descriptive statistics showing responses on the extent to which

         empowerment in capital/finance affect entrepreneurial capacity                                     60

 

4.8.   Descriptive statistics showing responses on the extent to which

         technological empowerment increase entrepreneurial capability                                     61

 

4.9.   Descriptive statistics showing responses on the extent to

         which academic empowerment increase entrepreneurial capacity                                    61

 

4.10. Simple regression analysis showing the effect of empowerment

          in skills on entrepreneurial competency of the agro-based

          entrepreneurs in Abia State                                                                                          62

 

4.12. Simple regression analysis showing the effect of empowerment in

         capital/finance on entrepreneurial capacity of the agro-based

         entrepreneurs in Abia State                                                                                           63

 

4.13. Simple regression analysis showing the effect of technological

         empowerment on entrepreneurial capability of the agro-based

         entrepreneurs in Abia State                                                                                           64

 

4.14: Simple regression analysis showing the effect of academic

         empowerment on entrepreneurial capacity of the agro-based

         entrepreneurs in Abia State                                                                                           66

 





 

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION


1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Millions new enterprises start each year despite more than a 50% failure rate. Consumers, business people, and government officials take an interest in this activity. This interest is evidenced in the increasing research on the subject, the increased number of courses on entrepreneurship and the increased coverage by the media.

Starting and managing a new agro-based firm involves considerable risk and effort to overcome all the inertia against creating something new. In creating and helping a new venture to grow, the entrepreneur has all the responsibility for its development, growth and survival, as well as corresponding risk and rewards, and thus, the function of economic empowerment for such entrepreneur becomes important.

Entrepreneurship in Nigeria started when people in the villages and farming communities produced more products than they needed, as such; they had to exchange these surpluses with those who needed them within their immediate and neighbouring communities. The exchange of goods for goods or services was based on trade by barter initially, until commodity money was developed and used. Exchange encouraged specialisation among producers, and the communities came to realize that they can concentrate on the areas of production they are best fitted. Consequently on the above, the culture of entrepreneurship started in Nigeria (Raimi and Towobola, 2011).

The role of economic empowerment on the sustainable growth of their enterprise is difficult to accurately measure or estimate, but it is believed to be highly dynamic and significant (Chu, 2010). Among others, Nigeria, one of the major oil producing countries in the world was recent classified to be one of the poorest countries. World Bank (2000) stated that the poverty has increased dramatically with 65% of the population living below the poverty line as against 43% in 1992. It has been observed that there is no country in Africa whose deterioration in socio-economic status has been as severe as that of Nigeria, to the extent that within the last five years, half of the population is living below the poverty line (World Bank, 2000). The socio-economic status of the citizens has considerably affected the development and improvement of certain sectors. Recent times have witnessed a number of strategies, and activities like sharply expanded programmes, techniques and innovations in agricultural programmes in Nigeria in order to address the deteriorating socio-economic situation. Universities, research institutes and private sector organizations are the most important institutions involved in the technical entrepreneurship, which is one of the major sources of wealth, power and employment in developed countries. Unfortunately, the absence of viable industrial and private sector, the deficiencies of existing infrastructure and dominance of foreign-based multinational companies tend to have a limiting effect on the capacity to create, foster and nurture indigenous enterprises in Nigeria. Identifying and supporting the activities of potential and existing entrepreneurs has become a major concern for an increasing number of governments in developed and developing countries. Public policies are designed in developing countries to increase the pool of entrepreneurs and to promote the formation of certain types of business at the micro and small-scale levels which foster technological activities (Litvak, 2002).

The governments in most developing countries such as Nigeria were criticized for paying inadequate attention to the need for accelerated economic growth and for not harnessing the abilities of their own citizens for technological innovations and entrepreneurship (Anamekwe, 2001). Critic concluded that these developing countries depend on exogenous technologies that are inappropriate for their environment. This has been responsible for Nigeria’s exports which have largely been based on raw materials and semi-manufactured goods with the petroleum sector as the most important. Less than 5% of these exports are on the average attached to knowledge intensive goods and services (Akeredolu-Ale, 1975). These problems became acute in the 1980’s and early 1990’s, when Nigeria experienced stagnating industrial output and decreasing crude oil prices while industrialization through the production of indigenous technological development became central topics in the industrial policy debates. This view was subsequently enunciated in the various development plans, national budgets, and rolling plans and in the current reform programmes elaborated in the National Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy (NEEDS) (Sule, 1986). The central theme of the policy has been that small industries should spearhead the nations drive towards economic recovery. Studies have shown that small-scale industries in many countries provide the mechanism for promoting indigenous entrepreneurship, enhancing greater opportunities per unit of capital invested and aiding the development of local technology (Nils-Henrik and Morch, 1995). Recent work summarized in the background paper on small-scale industries has shown that small-scale forest-based processing enterprises form a very large part of the overall forest products processing total in employment terms (FAO, 1995).

In Nigeria, small-scale businesses represent about 90% of the industrial sector in terms of the number of enterprises. They also account for 70% of national industrial employment if the threshold is set at 10-50 employees, contribute 10% of manufacturing output and a meager 1% of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2001 (Ajayi, 2002). Similarly, they have also contributed significantly to economic development through employment, job creation and sustainable livelihood (Nigeria Investment Promotion Commission, 2003).

In spite of the major role, the significance and contributions of the small-scale enterprises to the national economy, this set of enterprises are still battling with many problems and certain constraints that exist in promoting their development and growth. For instance, (International Labour Organization, 1994) study shows that inadequate entrepreneurial talent affects the development of small-scale manufacturing and processing industries. While large-scale industries are established with expatriate capital, small-scale industries need to have a domestic entrepreneurial and industrial base. Other problems that hinder the advancement of small-scale enterprises are the persistent low level of technology, the shortage inadequate entrepreneurial skills of operators and the absence of an effective management technique. Discussion of a change in the level of technology and its impact on the Nigerian industries has focused on large firms (i.e capital-intensive, high technology sectors). Focus on this change in the small-scale firms is relatively little. Small-scale enterprises tend to concentrate on traditional industries where low entry barriers, low minimum production scales, and relatively large labour force are the potential advantages.

However, the traditional industries have not been immune to the recent technological revolution taking place in the field (Adubifa, 1990). Hanshom (1992) and McCormick (1998) stated that African small enterprises are found to be unorganized in production activities. Low capital investment on capital goods and lack of division of labour in production makes these enterprises remained week. It is a clear fact that many micro, small and medium-scale enterprises are dying out owing to lack of financial support from the government and other citizens. Mills (1990) stated that the major pre-occupation of all developing countries these days is simply how to improve social, economic and political status of the people. According to Uma (2004), it involves the improvement of the living standards of the mass of the low income population and making the process self-sustaining. Improving the living standard of the people involves the setting of priorities in the mobilization and the use of resources available. In some rural areas, the working and living conditions of women for instance, have not been able to be ameliorated by many recent programmes designed to improve their economic status. Many writers have pointed out the detrimental effects on women of technological and socio-economic changes in the process of development (Palmer, 1978; Whitehead 1985; Stevens 1985). There has not been a total consideration and enough provisions for some rural entrepreneurs in the development process. Many of these entrepreneurs are left out in the provisions of the government toward the advancement of their enterprises.

The present economic crisis in Nigeria has brought about an ironic change – an increased demand for locally produced goods. For example, aso oke (a type of traditional dress woven in the cottage industry) is now popular at social gatherings and in the fashion houses. Because refrigerators have become unaffordable, rural dwellers are stuck with locally produced “water pots” which are noted for their cooling effects on drinking water. Also, many Nigerians have now resorted to using locally produced soap (ose dudu, i.e black soap). Yet, the people producing these goods are constrained by their lack of access to critical resources (capital, labour, land, infrastructures, and improved technology).

Who wants to accept all the risks and efforts involved in creating a new agro-based venture? The person may be a man or woman, come from an upper-class or a lower-class background, have a college or a university Degree or be a high school dropout. The person may have been a student, a teacher, an engineer, a salesperson, a manager, a retired person, etc.

This research work “The impact of socio-economic background on entrepreneurial capacity” therefore investigated certain demographic variables of entrepreneurs influence their operations.

1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

 Nigerian Entrepreneurs face many challenges. The future appears very bleak. Very few research results are available on youth attitudes toward entrepreneurship. More information is required for the development of suitable interventions to improve the employability of the youth exiting from higher institutions and other levels. The problem statement central to this study is the expectation that exposure to entrepreneurship will influence young people attitudes towards entrepreneurship as a career choice and subsequently their plans for the future.

Entrepreneurial capacity in any particular economy is affected by many personal and environmental forces. Lack of quality education in Nigeria has terribly hindered the advancement of entrepreneurship in Nigeria. The right education equips the entrepreneurs with the requisite skill to develop and run a successful business enterprise.

There is also the problem of capital. Many Entrepreneurs fund their business through their personal funds especially the new ones as bank loans and finance in Nigeria is difficult to obtain. Most times, the interest rate on bank loans becomes too astronomical for the capital to be repaid. 

The deplorable state of Nigeria’s infrastructure system is another problem facing the development and growth/success of many Entrepreneurs in Nigeria. There are no good roads for easy access to markets; the power system is better imagined than seen. One has to be ready to supply power to his venture if you decide to run a business. The effort of the government to provide adequate electricity to entrepreneurs has often been sabotaged.

Lack of the requisite entrepreneurial skills on the side of most Nigerian entrepreneurs is also one of the challenges that they face. Entrepreneurship involves starting and running a business. Such activity cannot be progressive without the right skills. It therefore becomes necessary for Entrepreneurs to be empowered so as to handle the challenges posed by the environment of agro based businesses in Abia State.


1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The main objective of this study was to show the effect of economic empowerment on the entrepreneurship growth in Abia State.

The specific objectives of the study were to:

      i.         analyze the effect of empowerment in skills on entrepreneurial competency of the agro-based entrepreneurs in Abia State;

     ii.         ascertain the effect of empowerment in capital/finance on entrepreneurial capacity of the agro-based entrepreneurs;

   iii.         determine the effect of technological empowerment on entrepreneurial capability of the agro-based entrepreneurs;

   iv.         analyze the effect of academic empowerment on entrepreneurial capacity of the agro-based entrepreneurs.

1.4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS

In order to achieve the above aims and objectives of this research work, relevant questions were asked and answered. These include;

      i.         What is the effect of empowerment in skills on entrepreneurial competency of the agro-based entrepreneurs in Abia State?

     ii.         What is the effect of empowerment in capital/finance on entrepreneurial capacity of the agro-based entrepreneurs?

   iii.         What is the effect of technological empowerment on entrepreneurial capability of the agro-based entrepreneurs?

   iv.         What is the effect of academic empowerment on entrepreneurial capacity of the agro-based entrepreneurs?

1.5 STATEMENT OF HYPOTHESIS

In order to arrive at statistical conclusion on the issue at stake, the following hypotheses were tested;

HO1: Empowerment in skills does not have any significant effect on entrepreneurial competency of the agro-based entrepreneurs in Abia State;

HO2: Empowerment in capital/finance does not have any significant effect on entrepreneurial capacity of the agro-based entrepreneurs

HO3: Technological empowerment does not have any significant effect on entrepreneurial capability of the agro-based entrepreneurs

HO4: Academic empowerment does not have significant effect on entrepreneurial capacity of the agro-based entrepreneurs.

1.6 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

Because of the importance of entrepreneurship to the growth of an economy, this study intends to uncover some problems faced by Nigerian entrepreneurship and the factors contributing to their success. Results from this study hopefully can provide helpful information to policy decision-makers in creating an environment conclusive to the development of the agribusiness sector. Policy makers will through the result of the study develop a guide on the right policies that will help promote entrepreneurial development and performance of agro based firms, particularly for the SMEs.

Many entrepreneurs in Nigeria which are desirous of expanding their entrepreneurial capacities will also through this study know the various ways they can be empowered by the government and how they can overcome challenging barriers which they will encounter in entrepreneurship.

The result will form a commendable attempt to make visible the various economic empowerment options available to potential entrepreneurs in Abia State and beyond. Some common errors that have made many new businesses a failure will also be revealed by the study.

It will serve as a good reference point for future researchers in this interesting and challenging area of study.

1.7 SCOPE OF THE STUDY

This research work was on the effect of economic empowerment on the entrepreneurship growth in Abia State. The study was an attempt to reveal how economic empowerment can affect the growth of manufacturing firms in the State. Geographically, the research work was initially aimed at covering as many indigenous manufacturing industries as there are in Abia State. However, as a result of time, resources and/or finance that usually militates against such an elaborate study, the researcher narrowed down the study area and concentrate on only three (3) manufacturing firms in Aba. These firms were selected based on their large involvement in the use of agro-based products/materials as well as their nearness to the researcher. The firms were Livestock Feeds Limited, Aba, and Valleumbra Flour Mills Ltd.

The researcher believes that the information obtained from these firms will have much relevance to other agro-based firms in Abia State of Nigeria.


1.8 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

This study focused on the effect of economic empowerment on the entrepreneurship growth in Abia State. A research work of this magnitude should cover as many agro-based firms as there are in Abia State. However, as a result of the inherent difficulty mostly resources and time in carrying out such a wide survey, the researcher narrowed down to concentrate on three (3) agro-based firms in the industrial city of Aba, Abia State. It is the belief of the researcher that the information obtained from these firms will have much relevance to other agro-based firms in Abia State of Nigeria and beyond, although there might be slight differences.

Having mentioned the limiting factors of time and finance, it is also necessary to reveal here that attitude of most of the studied entrepreneurs toward the release of vital information was skeptical. Perhaps, this was out of fear that such information may get into the hands of their competitors. Such uncooperative, lukewarm and often repulsive attitude imposed some limitations to this study. However, these constraints do not in any way invalidate the findings of this study.


1.9   PROFILES OF THE FIRMS UNDER STUDY

1.9.1 Valleumbra Flour Mills Ltd

Valleumbra Flour Mills Nigeria Limited is an indigenous manufacturing firm involved in the processing of Agro allied products. It is located at KM 2 Aba/Enugu Expressway Aba, Abia State, Nigeria. The company has diversified into this sector of the economy in line with the Federal Government of Nigerian’s economic policy to invest in Agricultural related ventures to boost local food production.

Company’s principal activities

Valleumbra Flour Mills is engaged in the production of:

- Wheat flour

- Wheat semolina

- Spaghetti

- Macaroni

- Bran

Company strategy

- To pursue profitable growth in all areas of our activities.

- To defend company’s traditional business.

- To transform organizational facilities, systems and services for the 21st century challenges.

- To create long-term partnership with customers

Valleumbra Flour Mills Nigeria Limited has a policy thrust to defend organizational

tradition through:

- Improved services.

- Expansion of operations

- Costs reduction and improvement of margins

- Creative marketing

- Sound practice of customer relationship management

About the company’s products

All products are produced to meet international standards and requirements of regulating agencies. The short (Macaroni) pasta comes in different packages and shapes, with the possibility of new variants as the consumer needs and wants demand in the market.

The company’s range of products includes:

- Valleumbra Flour

- Valleumbra Semolina

- Valleumbra spaghetti

- Valleumbra short pasta

- Valleumbra wheat offal (Bran)

- Anzy Spaghetti

- Anzy Macaroni

Company’s vision

“We aspire to be a prominent player in the agro allied industry in Nigeria and beyond”.

Company’s mission

“To produce and market superior quality agro allied products with latest technologies, investing in our people and environment, and providing attractive returns to all stakeholders as a responsible corporate citizen”.

Company’s value

“We value and respect our people, customers, shareholders, ethical standards, technology and environment because they are our partners in business”.

 

1.9.2 Livestock feeds limited, Aba

Livestock Feeds Limited, Aba is located at 12, Industrial Layout, Aba, Abia State. Livestock Feeds was established in 1963 by Pfizer as a subsidiary to the pharmaceutical business which had been introduced to Nigeria few years earlier. Following importation of exotic milking cows and hybrid chickens into the country by the Germans, Dutch and later Americans, the need to provide health and nutritional products led to the creation of the Animal Health Division and then the Feed Division. Pfizer held 80% equity shareholding while a few Nigerians had the balance of 20%.

The first Mill with a capacity of 5MT/hr was installed at Ikeja in 1963, followed by Aba in 1964 and Kaduna in 1965 with 4MT and 3.5MT per hour capacity respectively. Accelerated growth in urban and sub-urban population as well as increased demand for poultry and eggs impacted positively on the feed business, leading to the Company’s phenomenal growth. With installed capacity of 40MT/hr single shift and network of 12 franchise millers, Livestock Feeds was the dominant brand and benchmark in the industry. At the peak of its growth, the Company had 55% of the market share.

On introduction of the Indigenization decree, Pfizer was compelled to divest 20% of its shareholding to Nigerians, thus reducing its stake to 60%. The Company’s shares were subsequently listed on The Exchange in 1973. Between 1996 and 1997, Pfizer divested its interest in Livestock Feeds which was acquired by Adset Limited through a Management Buy-Out. Faced with significant financing needs, the new owners resorted to high cost short-term borrowings to fund both working and capital expenditure. This resulted in a funding mismatch that impaired the Company’s cash flows and debt service capabilities. The Company subsequently saw its market share down to less than 5% in 2005. With debt of over ₦1.3 billion owed to banks and other creditors and accumulated losses in excess of ₦1 billion, the Company was essentially insolvent.

After many previous unsuccessful attempts to get a core investor revamp the Company, First Capital Trust Plc was engaged as turn-around managers in 2005. With a bridge finance facility of ₦300 million and the dexterity of the turn-around managers, the Company was able to negotiate a debt relief in excess of ₦800 million, which paved way for Livestock Feeds eventual restructuring. Thereafter, a successful Rights Issue of ₦300 million was floated in 2007 resulting in change of ownership structure as First Capital Trust Plc replaced Adset Limited as the core investor in the newly invigorated Company. The proceeds of the Issue were used to pay off the bridge finance as well as provide working capital for the Company.

The intention of the management was to put the Company on a sound footing to enhance access to more funds from the capital market to rehabilitate aged machines and other critical infrastructures. This plan was however truncated due to the global economic meltdown of 2008 and its attendant negative effect on the Nigerian capital market. Management was thus forced to suspend most of the plans for aggressive growth and expansion of the Company and concentrate on steadily regaining the lost market share with the limited funding the Company was able to obtain from banks. In order to achieve this objective, some minor capacity expansion programs were carried out. A second manual Mill was fabricated for the Ikeja Mill while the mothballed Kaduna Mill was rehabilitated and reopened. Funding from the commercial banks was however expensive and led to reduced margins until the introduction of the Commercial Agriculture Credit Scheme by the Federal Government in 2010.

At the Company’s 2008 Annual General Meeting, the Board was authorized by its shareholders to raise additional capital from the capital market in order to further improve cash flow and liquidity position as well as continue with the replacement of our ageing plants and machinery. The prevailing loss of investors' confidence following the 2008 stock market crash prevented the Company from approaching the primary market to raise the much needed funds.

The Board however considered the urgent need to inject additional capital into the Company and thus explored multiple options for raising the required capital. UACN was identified as a potential investor, and expressed its intention to acquire 51% of the Company’s issued and fully paid up shares. A special placing of 800,000,000 ordinary shares of 50 kobo each at an Issue price of ₦1.13 was approved and issued to UACN on July 27, 2012 which was paid for by UACN; representing 40% of the Company’s authorized share capital. UACN then acquired additional shares from other shareholders to bring its total shareholding to 51%. The acquisition by UACN provided funding for working capital, technical, managerial and financial support to the Company. The flagship Mill, the Ikeja Mill, which was aged, was replaced in 2014 with a new 12MT/hr Mill to provide more production capacity.

Products of the company

Livestock Feeds is engaged in the business of Feeds Milling and it has been an excellent caterer for all species of animals; providing nutritious and balanced portions for animal production since 1963. The flagship brand of the Company is Livestock Feeds while its nascent brand is Aquamax Fish Feed.

The Company has two broad product categories of Livestock Feeds: Poultry (Finished Feeds and Concentrates) and Fish.

a) Poultry

i) Finished feeds

ii) Concentrates – Livestock Feeds has developed a wide range of protein based concentrates with proper mixing instructions to yield an equivalent of its finished feeds at a lower cost.

b) Fish - Aquamax

Livestock Feeds is set to grow its revenue base substantially by consolidating the marketing presence of its Fish Feed brand; Aquamax which was officially introduced to the market by the end of 2014. The Company is positioned to leverage on opportunities that exist in the aquaculture sub-sector of the economy

1.9.3 PZ Wilmar

PZ Wilmar formed in December 2010, is a joint venture between PZ Cussons, an international consumer products group headquartered in the UK with operations in Africa, Asia, the Middle East and Europe and Wilmar International Limited founded in 1991 and headquartered in Singapore and is Asia’s leading agribusiness group. In 2011, the PZ Wilmar joint venture was formed with the ambition to establish a food ingredients consumer brand. Together with the partner Wilmar International Ltd, the company have developed a new range of edible cooking oils - Mamador, providing great quality, healthy cooking oil for Nigerian families, refined locally in their new world class Palm Oil refinery in Lagos. Their jointly owned palm oil plantations in Nigeria are aiming to ensure ongoing oil supply and to support investment in the local Nigerian palm oil industry.

Product range

Mamador is superior quality 100% pure, vegetable oil from PZ Wilmar. The company has taken care to ensure that every single stage of our production process, from selection through to new tamper proof packaging, is to unrivaled quality standards. Their brand is all about new, world class production standards, delivering superior quality, purity, and taste. Mamador edible oil, from PZ Wilmar is a $64M investment into the edible oils market in Nigeria. They are investing in plantations on a vast scale, building a new world class refinery, training staff on new quality standards and supporting education in communities where they operate.

The company’s investments in oil palm plantations and associated infrastructures currently stand at about N45 billion (approximately $150 million). These include a processing plant at Calaro Estate in Akamkpa Local Government Area in Cross River State. The estate consists a 45 tonne per hour palm oil mill (POM) and a 2.5 tonne per hour kernel crushing plant (KCP).

Its Chief Executive Officer, Christos Giannopoulos, said the POM basically converts fresh fruit bunches (FFB) into palm oil. This process involves extracting red palm oil from the fleshy outer mesocarp of the palm fruit. The product is known as Crude Palm Oil (CPO), similar to the red palm oil that is sold in the local market. The KCP, on the other hand, extracts palm kernel oil (PKO) from the palm kernels. The company’s palm oil mill at Ibad Oil Palm Estate in Cross River has the capacity of 20 tonnes per hour in terms of FFB processing. He said the company has invested around N20 billion in an oil palm refinery in Ikorodu, Lagos State.

To the company, Nigeria has the biggest market in Africa and is the largest consumer of the palm oil in the region. Currently, there is a massive gap between demand and supply. Estimates of this deficit are around 600,000 to 700,000 tonnes per annum. Last year, he added that the company launched its Pilot Out growers Scheme. The goal is to support local farmers to develop viable and sustainable oil palm businesses.

As part of the programme, the company makes available, high quality seedlings for farmers, training them on Best Management Practices (BMPs) to optimise their yields. For stakeholders, while there are significant efforts to reduce the gap between demand and supply of palm oil in Nigeria, there is massive smuggling of palm oil across the borders to the tune of 400,000 tons per annum due to which the federal government loses millions of dollars in revenue from duty and tax collection..

1.10   OPERATIONAL DEFINITION OF TERMS

Empowerment: is a process of change that focuses on expanding the range of choices that people can make. It is also the process through which individuals and communities achieve autonomy, insisting on the building of self-reliance, self-confidence, organizations, and social alliances. It further involves both the growth of individual opportunity as well as the removal of external constraints on seizing opportunity.

Entrepreneur: is one who brings other people together in order to build a single productive organization. He is also one who organizes, manages and assumes the risks of a business enterprise.

Economic empowerment: is the ability to make and act on decisions that involve the control over and allocation of financial resources (Golla, et. al, 2011).

Technological empowerment: is the strengthening our scientific knowledge in order for us to learn how to apply those technology-related information at certain points in our lives.

Entrepreneurial competencies: means underlying characteristics possessed by a person, which result in new venture creation. These characteristics include generic and scientific knowledge, motives, traits, self images, social roles, and skills that may or may not be known to the person.

Entrepreneurial capacity: is the capacity and willingness to develop, organize and manage a business venture along with any of its risks in order to make a profit.


Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment