EFFECT OF ADOPTION OF WEST AFRICA AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY PROGRAMME (WAAPP) TECHNOLOGIES ON RICE FARMERS’ PRODUCTION IN EBONYI STATE, NIGERIA

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00009232

No of Pages: 116

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦5000

  • $

ABSTRACT

The West Africa agricultural productivity programme (WAAPP) has a package of technologies for farmers’ adoption, which are expected to increase rice production. But whether this expectation has been met is worth investigating. This study was therefore carried out to determine the effect of adoption of WAAPP technologies on rice farmers’ production in Ebonyi state, Nigeria. Specifically, the study described the socio-economic characteristics of the respondents, determined the effectiveness of WAAPP in training and input delivery to the respondents, determined the extent of adoption of the technologies disseminated by WAAPP, ascertained the effect of adoption of WAAPP technologies on the respondents’ yield, determined the effect of adoption of WAAPP technologies on income and examined the challenges faced by the respondents which limited their production. The study employed multi-stage random sampling techniques to select a sample of 180 rice farmers. Three agricultural zones were selected, namely: Ebonyi north, Ebonyi central and Ebonyi south. Two blocks from each of the agricultural zones were selected giving a total of 6 extension blocks. Three cells were randomly selected from each of the blocks giving a total of 18 cells. Ten rice farmers who participated in WAAPP were randomly selected from each of the selected cells giving a sample of 180. Primary data were sourced from the farmers through a structured questionnaire. Both descriptive and inferential statistics such as mean, frequencies, percentages and simple regression analysis was used to analyse the data. Results show that the mean age of respondents was 35years. Most of the respondents (66.11%) were married. The average household size was 6 persons. Major occupation of greater number of the respondents (53.89%) was farming. The average number of years of experience was 10 years. On the average, the farm size of the respondents was 2.5 hectares. The grand mean of 2.37 was obtained on effectiveness of WAAPP on training and input delivery, on a three point scale. A grand mean score of 2.38 on a three point scale indicated a moderate level of adoption of WAAPP technologies. An average of 3.6 metric tons per hectare was harvested showing increased yield.Similarly, an average annual income of N446,530.55 was also reported. Result of the regression analysis with respect to hypothesis 1 showed that there was a significant relationship between adoption of WAAPP technologies and yield. For hypothesis 2, a significant relationship was found between adoption of WAAPP technologies and income.  Thus, the null hypotheses were rejected, while the alternative hypotheses were accepted at 5% level. The study concluded that the adoption of WAAPP technologies by rice farmers increased their yield and income. The study therefore recommended among others greater sensitization and participation of more farmers in the programme to attainment of food security and poverty alleviation in the study area.








TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                                                                                                Page

Title Page                                                                                                     i

Declaration                                                                                                 ii

Certification                                                                                              iii

Dedication                                                                                                 iv

Acknowledgement                                                                                      v

Table of Contents                                                                                      vi

List of Tables                                                                                          viii

List of Figures                                                                                           ix

Abstract                                                                                                       x

 

CHAPTER 1:   INTRODUCTION

1.1      Background of The Study                                                                 1

1.2      Statement of the Problem                                                                  4

1.3      Research Questions                                                                           6

1.4      Objectives of the Study                                                                     6

1.5      Hypotheses                                                                                        7

1.6      Justification of The Study                                                                 7

 

CHAPTER2:  LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1      Agricultural Development In Nigeria                                               9

2.2   Major Agricultural Policies That Affects Rice Production in Nigeria                                                                                                      11

2.3   Transforming Rice Production in Nigeria                                        13

2.4   The Concept Of World Bank Assisted Programmes In Nigeria      15

2.5   Some Farmer’s Agricultural Production Foundation Programmes in Nigeria                                                                                                      18

2.6   Agricultural Value Chain Studies And Implementation Projects    22

2.6.1Analysis of 6 Agricultural Value Chains                                                                                   22                                                                                                                                                                                                       

2.7   Major Problems of Rice Production In Nigeria That Attracted World Bank Assisted

          Programmes                                                                                    24

2.8   Lessons from World Bank Assisted Agricultural Policies and Programmes in Nigeria                                                                             29

2.9   World Bank Agricultural Policies and Programmes That Affected Rice Production in

The Colonial Era                                                                                      31

2.9.1  Farm Settlement Scheme (FSS)                                                      32

2.10   Agricultural Policies And Programmes That Affected Rice Production In The Post-

   Colonial Era                                                                                    33

2.10.115th January 1966 to 29th May 1999 (Military Era)                        34

2.11   Government Programmes To Alleviate Poverty Among Rice And Other Arable Crop

Farmers                                                                                              41

2.11.1 National Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy (NEEDS)                                 42

2.11.2 National, Special Programme on Food Security (NSPFS)                                                     43

2.11.3 Root and Tuber Expansion Programme (RTEP)                                                                    44

2.12   Inconsistency Of Agricultural Policies And Programmes             46

2.12.1    Emphasis on Mainly Food and Animal Production                                                              46

2.12.2  Delay, Embezzlement, Misappropriation and Lack of Fund to Pursue Specific

 Policy/Programme to an Expected End                                                                                 47

2.12.3 Inadequate Virile Technical Advisory/Extension Services                                                     47

2.12.4 Lack/Inadequate Monitoring and Evaluation of Programmes/Project                                       48

2.13   Theoretical Framework                                                                  48

2.13.1  Modernization Theory                                                                                                            48

2.13.2  Technological Theory                                                                                                            52

2.13.3  The Economic Theory                                                                                                                        53

2.14   Conceptual Framework                                                                  55

 

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY

3.1     Study Area                                                                                      58

3.2     Population of Study                                                                         59

3.3     Sample and Sampling Procedure                                                    59

3.4     Data Collection                                                                               59

3.5     Validity of the Instrument                                                               60

3.6     Reliability of the Instrument                                                           60

3.7     Data Analysis                                                                                  60

3.8      Model Specification                                                                        61

3.8.1      Co-efficient of Determination (r2)                                                                                          63

3.8.2      Inference about the Parameters in Regression and Correlation Analysis                                  64

3.9     Justification of the Model                                                               64

3.10   Measurement of Variables                                                              64

3.10.1 Independent Variable                                                                                                                                               64                                                                              

3.10.2 Dependent Variable                                                                                                                 65

3.10.3  Intervening Variables:                                                                                                            65

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1     Socio-Economic Characteristics of the Respondents                     67

4.1.1 Age                                                                                                                                            69

4.1.2 Sex                                                                                                                                             69

4.1.3Level of education                                                                                                                      70

4.1.4    Marital status                                                                                                                          70

4.1.5    Household Size                                                                                                                       71

4.1.6    Major Occupation                                                                                                                   71

4.1.7    Farming Experience                                                                                                               72

4.1.9    Extension Contacts                                                                                                                 72

4.1.10 Co-operative Membership                                                                                                      73

4.1.11  Farm Size                                                                                                                                73

4.1.12 Farmers Status                                                                                                                        74

4.1.13  Workshop/Training/Seminar Attendance                                                                              74

4.2     Activities of WAAPP Engaged in by Rice Farmers in Ebonyi State 74

4.3:   Extent of Adoption of Technologies Disseminated By WAAPP Programme                                                                                               76

4.4     Effects of Adoption of WAAPP Technologies on the Respondents Yield 79

4.5     Effects of Adoption of WAAPP Technologies on the Respondents Income                                                                                                      82

4.6:  Constraints Faced By the Respondents In The Study Area            83

4.7     Test of Hypotheses                                                                          85

4.7.1    Test of Hypothesis One                                                                                                          85

4.7.2    Test of Hypothesis Two                                                                                                          87


CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS87

5.1     Summary                                                                                         89

5.2     Conclusion                                                                                      92

5.3     Recommendations                                                                         100

References

Appendices


 






LIST OF TABLES

4. I       Distribution of the socio-economic characteristics of the respondents

4.2       Farmers rating of effectiveness of WAAPP in training and input delivery

4.3       Extent of adoption of technologies disseminated by WAAPP programme

4.4       Effects of adoption of WAAPP technologies on the respondents’ Yield

4.5       Effects of adoption of WAAPP technologies on the respondents’ income

4.6       Constraints faced by the respondents in the study area.

4.7       Simple regression estimates of the relationship between adoption of WAAPP rice technologies and farmers yield

4.9       Simple regression estimates of the relationship between adoption of WAAPP rice technologies and farmers income.

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

LIST OF FIGURES

 

2.1       Agricultural development programmes and policies in Nigeria

 

2.2       Conceptual framework adapted and modified after Abiodun (2006) and Ume (2008).

         

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 


CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION


1.1       BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

In Africa, agriculture records for 65% of employment and 35% of total national output (Gross domestic product). However,poverty stays high in rural regions where larger piece of the populace relies upon agriculture to bring home the bacon (Okwara and Amadi, 2008).  By raising farm incomes, generating employment and reducing food prices, Ogunbayo (2006) asserted that agricultural growth can be a transformative tool for poverty reduction. To accomplish the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of eliminating hunger and poverty, Onajirinet al., (2009), expressed that African countries need to prioritize agriculture and rural development in their development agenda.

The West Africa Agricultural Productivity Programme (WAAPP) is a World Bank collaborated Programme for member-nations of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), planned to make agriculture more productive and sustainable and alsoenhance sub-regional incorporation (World Bank, 2013). According to Douglas and Leen (2014), WAAPP strives to meet these goals by building a food system to feed every West African.  Created by the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), and financed partly by the World Bank, WAAPP is boosting agricultural productivity and sustainability across 13 West African countries to help build a food-secure future (World Bank, 2013).

In Nigeria, (FMA&RD, 2013), highlighted that WAAPP works towards achieving its objective of increasing agricultural productivity while promoting sub-regional integration along the value chains of its selected commodities (aquaculture, cassava, maize; rice, sorghum, yam, poultry and fruit processing); while adding the achievement of the nation's Agricultural Transformation Agenda, this it does through four (4) components, which are:

1.      enabling conditions for sub-regional teamwork in technology generation, dissemination and adoption;

  1. national Centre of Specialization and Excellence in Aquaculture;
  2. funding of demand-driven technology generation and adoption; and
  3. project coordination, management, monitoring and evaluation.

WAAPP is coordinated at the sub-regional level by the West and Central African Council for Agricultural Research and Development (CORAF/WECARD) (Nwaneri and Njoku, 2014).

In Nigeria, WAAPP is being carried out by Agricultural Research Council of Nigeria of the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (FMA&RD) through a Project Coordination Office (PCO) (FMA&RD, 2013). WAAPP-Nigeria became effective in January 2012 and the first phase will close in 2016 (FMA&RD, 2013). Invariably, WAAPP is a multi-year effort to transform West African agriculture by boosting productivity and sustainability, reducing hunger and improving nutrition, creating jobs and supporting collaboration across borders (Asionye, 2013). The thirteen countries part-taking in WAAPP programme are Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Liberia, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone and Togo (World Bank,2013).

The programmeas illustrated by Ola and Abiodun (2014), aims to achieve 6% agricultural growth and increased food production and availability in West Africa.  WAAPP (2012), highlighted that its scientists, researchers, extension workers strives to achieve its mandate which include to:

1.       innovate, generate, disseminate and adopt improved technologies;

  1.  create enabling conditions for regional cooperation;
  2. build human and institutional capacity across the sub-region; and
  3. createyouth employment, engage women and adapt to climate change.

ECOWAS and the African Union provided agriculture and rural development frameworks for WAAPP (FAO, 2014). According to Ali et al., (2014), National Ministries of Agriculture and various producer organizations from participating countries implement and coordinate the programme.WAAPP is revitalizing agricultural science in West Africa by supporting the training of nearly 1000 scientists and establishing nine research centres of specialization around key commodities (WAAPP, 2012).

At present, WAAPP has directly benefited more than 6.1 million farmersincluding rice farmers), processors and small businesses across the Region, 45% of who are women (Nwankwo, 2015). According to FAO (2014), WAAPP is estimated to have boosted food production in West Africa by more than 3 million tons and raised beneficiary incomes by an average of 34%.Nwagbara and Onochie (2015) also highlighted that it hasdelivered around 160 climate-smart crop varieties, technologies and techniques to approximately 5.7 million farmers covering 3.6 million hectares in West Africa. These technologies have boosted productivity by up to 150% (WAAPP, 2014).

In Ghana, Mensah and Abel (2013) expressed that WAAPP provided eggs, incubators, feed and vaccines to 80 guinea fowl farmers to grow their operations. According to Manuel (2013), the programme allows beneficiary farmers to support others in their communities.In 2015, WAAPP delivered 10,500 tons of seeds to up to 200,000 farmers in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone to boost post-Ebola recovery (WAAPP, 2015), while in Senegal, 14 high-yielding, early maturing and drought resistant dry cereal varieties have been developed and are boosting productivity by at least 30% (FAO, 2015).  According to Ibrahim and Dele (2015), more than 423,000 Senegalese farmers have benefitted from the new varieties and become more resilient to climate shocks.

In Nigeria, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Liberia and Côte d’Ivoire, new saline-tolerant rice varieties, climate-smart irrigation techniques and better soil fertility management helped more than 100,000 farmers increase rice production (Bola et a., 2014), while Mensah and Abel (2013) expressed that WAAPP’s e-Agriculture Programme provides real-time advice to farmers in Ghana through phone or online. To date, the programme has 120,000 subscribers and has logged 1.76 million calls on a variety of issues, from land preparation to pest management (Mensah and Abel, 2013).

Throughout the region, Madumere and Nwaeke (2014)asserted that WAAPP has supported nutrition improvements through school feeding programmes, which incorporate many of the nutrient-rich, high-yielding crops developed by WAAPP researchers, including cassava, millet and rice, while Olaniran (2015) concluded that WAAPP revitalized agricultural science in West Africa, Nigeria inclusive by supporting the training of nearly 1,000 agricultural research scientists, establishing  research centres of specialization around key commodities, and upgraded research infrastructures and finance laboratories, equipments and activities.

But so far, much has not been known about WAAPP’s activities as it affects rice producing farmers in Ebonyi State Nigeria. Therefore this study focuses on the Effect of adoption of West African Agricultural Productivity Programme (WAAPP) technologies on Rice Farmer’s Production in Ebonyi State Nigeria.


1.2       STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

The West African Agricultural Productivity Programme (WAAPP) is sponsoring Nigeria’s agricultural research centres on rice production so as to reach ricefarmers in the country in order for them to overcome the problems they encounter on the course of their production (FMA&RD, 2013). The completion report for the first phase of WAAPP revealed that some of therice farmers have been able to enhance their production by an average of 40% and their revenues by 55% (WAAPP, 2013).

With the support of the programme, Ayorinde (2015) also expressed that Nigeria is strengthening its rice production systems as well as its research and technology transfer systems in order to provide comprehensive support for the implementation of West African Agricultural Productivity Programme (WAAPP). According to World Bank (2014), the integrated sub-regional aspect of the programme, which constitutes one of the programme’s biggest strengths, enables Nigeria to benefit from innovative technologies and techniques in rice productiondeveloped in the other WAAPP beneficiary areas.Some of these innovative techniques are the introduction of improved andmore resilient rice varieties, improved rice cultivation methods/techniques, improvedagro-chemicals for rice production (WAAPP, 2013). The WAAPP technologies have been disseminated among the rice farmers through extension officers in Agricultural Development Programme (ADP) of the state.

According to Ibrahim (2015),  the newly introduced resilient rice varieties allow rice farmers to maintain  production yields, especially when produce are in short supply in the markets and command higher prices. Rice farmers in Nigeria also benefit from training, study tours, knowledge exchanges between the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) stakeholders, and equipment prototypes during exchange visits, all of which help strengthen  their technical capacities (Kalu, 2015).

As the first phase of the project in Nigeria concluded, the World Bank approved financing for a second phase totalling $60 million (World Bank, 2015).The additional WAAPP financing will be used to scale up the production, dissemination, and adoption of improved rice technologies and assisting rice farmers in their production (Kola, 2015), but the extentto which adoption of West African Agricultural Productivity Programme (WAAPP)technologies in rice production has affectedrice farmersis yet unknown, hence thisgap is what necessitated this study considering the fact that Ebonyi State is one of the major rice producing states in Nigeria.

 

1.3       RESEARCH QUESTIONS

In conducting this study, the following research questions were formulated to guide the study:

1.     what are the socio-economic characteristics of the respondents?;

2.     what is the extent of engagement of the respondent?;

3.     what is the extent of adoption of the technologies disseminated to the farmers by WAAPP?;

4.     towhat extent has farmers adoption of WAAPP technologies increased their yield?;

5.     to what extent has farmers adoption of WAAPP technologies increased their income?;and

6.     what are the challenges faced by rice farmers which limit their production in the study area?

 

1.4       OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The broad objective of the study is to determine the Effect of adoption of West African Agricultural Productivity Programme (WAAPP) on Rice Farmers’ Production in Ebonyi State Nigeria. The specific objectives were to:

1.     describe the socio-economic characteristics of the respondents;

2.     determine the effectiveness of WAAPP in training and input delivery;

3.     determine the extent of adoption of the technologies disseminated by WAAPP to the respondent;

4.     ascertain the effect of adoption of WAAPP technologies on the respondents yield;

5.     determine the effect ofadoption ofWAAPP technologies on the respondents income;and

6.     examinethe challenges faced by the respondents which limit their production in the study area.

 

1.5       HYPOTHESES

Ho1: There is no significant relationship between adoption of WAAPP rice production technologies and farmers’ yield

Ho2: There is no significant relationship between adoption of WAAPP rice technologies and farmers’ income.


1.6       JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY

This study is expected to add the following knowledge to research:

First, it would provide first-hand information on the activities of WAAPP in transferring improved rice technologies to rice farmers and the challenges faced by ricefarmers in Ebonyi Statewhich limit their production.

The study would reveal the extent to which WAAPP has succeeded in improving rice production among the farmers participating in the programme. It is equally expected that the effect of WAAPP on yield and income of the farmers will help to determine how far the programme has gone in making rice production more profitable

Finally, the findings of the study would provide information that would help to improve service delivery of WAAPP       .

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.

Review


To Comment