ABSTRACT
All the samples put together were higher in pH value by 0.75 showing less acidity than the 3 controls put together (524, 535, 526). The gravimetric values and viscousity of the laboratory product were found to be higher than the circulating commercial yoghurt in gravimetry and viscosity by 18.18% by approximately 18.20%. physiochemically, no significant differences existed among all the samples of yoghurt of the both laboratory produced and the commercially vended yoghurt when analyzed statistically by analysis of variance at 0.005 confidence level. Proximately all the samples produced in the laboratory higher energy sources than those commercial ones (Percentage carbohydrates) by approximately16.66%. All the samples both commercial are personally produced had approximately the same amount of percentage mean protein value of almost 7.3. All samples had low percentage fat content. Although the commercial ones were slightly higher than the laboratory products by 0.20%. All yoghurt samples showed high moisture content of between 66.99%- 87.94%. yoghurt not withstanding the source or location of make was found to contain the following proximate; ash, moisture, fat, protein and carbohydrates no fiber was found in any of them. All the yoghurt samples had low percentage ash composition differing from one another by 0.1% ash. Since ash proximate indicates the quantity of minerals, vitamins and other essential food nutrients for healthy living experimentation revealed that all yoghurt were low in ash content and by inference, low in mineral content. No significant differences existed in the proximate composition of all of them at p=<0.05. Experimentation revealed that the yoghurt starter culture considering microbial flora, showed higher stability. Keeping to only Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophillus, throughout the research with the laboratory yoghurt having the highest load of Lactobacillus spp. on the contrary, the commercial yoghurt samples, were found to contain other microbial flora than the standard starter ciulture. It was varied that these unwanted organisms came into them during processing either by cross contamination or by some opportunistic phenomenon. It was noticed in all the commercial available yoghurt used as control. They were contaminated by certain strains of Staphylococcus aureus which is pathogenic and Saccharomyces cerevisae, yeast, which is alcohol producing. Impacting more sour taste than necessary to commercial yoghurt. Sensory evaluation revealed that all the laboratory yoghurt product surpassed the vended commercial product in aroma, colour, mouth feel, taste, texture and general acceptability by 75% in quality attributes. No microbial succession occurred in the laboratory samples. Noticeably, microbial succession by either Sacharomyces cerevisaePitschai spp or Staphylococcus aureus occurred in commercial yoghurt even with view to dominate the standard culture a trend which must be checked.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page i
Certification ii
Dedication iii
Acknowledgements iv
Table of Contents v
Lists of Tables viii
List of Figures ix
Abstract
x
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1
Aim and Objectives 3
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 Literature
Review 4
2.1
Varieties and Types of Yoghurt 6
2.2
Types of Yoghurt 10
2.3
Yoghurt Manufacturing Process 12
2.3.1 Milk Standardization 12
2.3.2 Homogenization 13
2.3.3
Heat
treatment 14
2.3.4 Fermentation process 15
2.3.5 Cooling
15
2.4 Production of Yoghurt 17
2.5
Probiotic Benefits of Yoghurt 19
2.6 Application of Probiotic Microorganisms
In Functional Foods 19
2.7
Yoghurt Spoilage Microorganisms 20
2.7.1
Psychrotrophs 20
2.7.2
Coliforms 21
2.7.3
Lactic Acid Bacteria 22
2.7.4
Fungi 22
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 Materials and Methods 24
3.1 Sample
Collection 24
3.2
Media Used 24
3.3 Sterilization 24
3.4
Sample Preparation 24
3.5 Laboratory
Production of Yoghurt 25
3.6 Isolation And Enumeration Of Bacterial
Isolates 26
3.6.1
Gram Staining 26
3.6.2
Spore Staining Technique 26
3.6.3
Motility Test 27
3.7
Biochemical Test 27
3.7.1 Catalase Test 27
3.7.2 Coagulase Test 27
3.7.3 Citrate Test 28
3.7.4 Oxidase Test 28
3.7.5 Indole Test 28
3.7.6 Urease Test 29
3.7.7 Methyl Red Test 29
3.7.8 Voges-proskaeur Test 29
3.7.9 Sugar Fermentation Test 30
3.8 Physiochemical
Analysis 30
3.8.1
Determination of pH 30
3.8.2.
Determination of T. T. A 31
3.8.3 Determination of total solids 31
3.8.4 Total Sugar 32
3.9 Proximate
Analysis 32
3.10
Determination of Fungi 34
3.11 Sensory Evaluation 35
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 Results 36
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0
Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendation 41
5.1 Discussion
41
5.2 Conclusion 43
5.3 Recommendation 44
References
LIST OF TABLES
Table Title
Page
1. Showing
the physiochemical characteristics of both the laboratory produced test
yoghurt samples and the locally
purchased yoghurt samples 37
2.
Showing proximate analysis result 38
3
Sensory evaluation 39
4
Biochemical test identification of microbial isolates from test samples
evaluated 40
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Title Page
1
Manufacturing process of
set- and stirred-yoghurt 16
2
A
schematic presentation of the production of yoghurt 18
CHAPTER ONE
1.0
INTRODUCTION
Yoghurt is a fermented dairy product, having several
health benefits. Yoghurt is mainly of two types i.e. set yoghurt and stirred
yoghurt. Yoghurt properties can be enhanced by the addition or treatment with
various additives. Yoghurt can be supplemented with various useful ingredients.
Addition of herbs or their active components like oils could be effective
strategy to improve functionality of milk and milk products with respect to the
health benefits, food safety and bio preservation (Whitt and Salyers, 2002).
Yoghurt is a very versatile product that suits
all palates and meal occasions (Isleten and Karagul-Yuceer, 2006). It is one of
the most popular fermented milk products (Lucey et al., 2009). Its attractiveness has grown and is at this time
used in most parts of the world (Lee and Lucey, 2010). Fermented milk, like the
fresh milk from which they are produced, is liable to contamination. Knowledge
of the behavior of yoghurt during storage is important, because its shelf life
is based on whether the product displays any of the physical, chemical, or
sensory characteristics that are unacceptable for consumption (Salvador and
Fiszman, 2004). Changes in the chemical, physical and microbiological
composition of yoghurt determine the storage and shelf life of the product
(Sofu and Ekinci, 2007). The pH values of yoghurt immediately after production
range between 4.5 and 4.2 (Holec, 2000).
The microbiological quality assessment of yoghurt is mainly concerned
with protection of the consumers against exposure to any health hazard and
ensuring that the material is not suffering microbiological deterioration
during its anticipated shelf-life (Caballero, 2003). In addition to
deterioration in sensory quality, microbiological counts have been used as
indices for the end of shelf life of dairy products (Muir and Banks, 2000).
Coliforms
detection or enumerating is often used as parameters for evaluating the yoghurt
quality in different countries (Tamine and Robinson, 2007). Presence of
Coliforms in dairy products is an indication of faecal contamination when the
hygiene is poor (Thatcher and Clark, 2008). Some members of Coliforms are
responsible for the development of objectionable taints in milk and its
products rendering them of inferior quality or even unmarketable (Yabaya and
Idris, 2012).
Escherichia coli (E. coli) frequently contaminate food and
it is considered a good indicator of fecal contamination (Singh and Prakash,
2008), its presence in milk products indicates presence of other
entero-pathogenic microorganisms which constitute public health hazard (Singh and
Prakash, 2008). Enterococci may have a distinctive role as indicators of poor
factory sanitation owing to their relatively high resistance to drying,
detergents, as well as freezing temperature. Moreover, these organisms are also
implicated in food poisoning outbreaks (Yabaya and Idris, 2012). Enterococci
organisms have been proposed for hygienic condition inspections in process
lines of fermented products (Vanos, 2011). The presence of enterococci in dairy
products has long been considered an indication of inadequate sanitary
conditions during the production and processing of milk (Giraffa et al., 2007).
Staphylococcus aureus
(S. aureus) in food article is an
index of its contamination from personnel sharing in production and handling.
Moreover, Enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus
aureus strains may find opportunity to grow and multiply in the food
leading to food poisoning among consumers (Abdel Hameed and El-Malt, 2009).
Yeasts are a major cause of spoilage of yogurt and fermented milks in which the
low pH provides a selective environment for their growth (Fleet, 2000). Yeast
and mold are the major contaminants in yoghurt (Nwagu and Amadi, 2010).
Micotoxigenic
fungi and pathogenic bacteria are able to grow at refrigeration temperature to
numbers, which can result to an infection (Potter and Hotchkiss, 2005).
Presence of yeasts and moulds in milk and dairy products are undesirable even
when found in few numbers as they result in objectionable changes that render
the products of inferior quality (Abdel Hameed 2011). Moulds and yeasts growing
in yoghurt utilize some of the acid and produce a corresponding decrease in the
acidity, which may favour the growth of putrefactive bacteria (Oyeleke, 2009).
1.1 AIM AND OBJECTIVES
The
aim of this study is to evaluate the comparative microbiological and
physiochemical analysis of locally and laboratory produced yoghurt.
The
objectives are
1. To
identify microorganisms associated with locally and laboratory produced
yoghurt.
2. To
determine the physiochemical characteristics of locally and laboratory produced
yoghurt.
3. To
determine the sensory evaluation of locally and laboratory produced yoghurt.
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment