ABSTRACT
The
effect of chloroquine, paracetamol and Promethazine on the pharmacokinetic
profile of chlorpropamide was investigated in human subjects.
The
batches of chlorpropamide, chloroquine, paracetamol and Promethazine used were
subjected to quality control studies using official methods. The drugs complied
with the B.P (1993) requirements stated in their monographs.
A
high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method was developed for the
analysis of plasma chlorpropamide concentration. Pharmacokinetic parameters of
chlorpropamide were derived with Winnonlin standard non-compartment software programme.
About
16%, 14% and 15% decrease in the mean maximum concentration (Cmax)
of chlorpropamide was observed following oral
administration
of chlorpropamide with chloroquine, paracetamol and Promethazine respectively.
About
44%, 11% and 30% decrease in the area under curve (AUC) of chlorpropamide was observed following concurrent
administration of chlorpropamide with chloroquine, paracetamol and Promethazine
respectively. The plasma clearance of chlorpropamide increased by 86% following
chlorpropamide interaction with chloroquine.
The absorption half-life (t½a) of chlorpropamide
increased by 4%, 85%
and
69% when concomitantly administered with chloroquine, paracetamol and
Promethazine respectively.
The elimination
constant (Kel) of chlorpropamide
was found to have
increased
by 100% and decreased by 31% following concomitant administration of
chlorpropamide with chloroquine and paracetamol respectively. The elimination
half-life (t½el)
of chlorpropamide was found to
have
decreased by 47% and increased by 13% and 29% following concomitant
administration to chlorpropamide with chloroquine, paracetamol and Promethazine
respectively.
The
study implied impaired absorption and elimination of chlorpropamide by chloroquine,
paracetamol and Promethazine.
|
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAGE
|
|
TITLE PAGE
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
i
|
DECLARATION
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
ii
|
CERTIFICATION
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
iii
|
DEDICATION
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
iv
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
v
|
PUBLICATIONS
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
viii
|
ABSTRACT
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
ix
|
TABLE OF CONTENT
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
x
|
LIST OF FIGURES-`
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
xvi
|
LIST OF TABLES
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
xviii
|
ABBREVIATIONS
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
xxi
|
CHAPTER
1
|
INTRODUCTION
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
1.1
|
Pharmacokinetics
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
1.1.1
|
Blood flow
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
1.1.2
|
Protein Binding
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
4
|
1.1.3
|
Lipid solubility
and the degree of ionization
|
-
|
-
|
5
|
1.1.4
|
Volume of
distribution
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6
|
1.2
|
Drug
bioavailability and its relationship to chemical
|
|
|
effectiveness
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
11
|
1.2.1
|
Some factors that
influence the bioavailability of a drug
|
14
|
1.2.1.1
|
Dosage form and
route of administration
|
-
|
-
|
14
|
1.2.1.2
|
Solubility
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
15
|
1.2.1.3
|
Hepatic binding to
plasma proteins
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
16
|
1.2.1.4
|
Drug bindings to
plasma proteins
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
16
|
1.2.1.5
|
Interactions
(food-drug or drug-drug interactions) -
|
17
|
1.2.2
|
Bioavailability relationship
to clinical effectiveness -
|
17
|
1.2.3
|
Drug level
monitoring
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
20
|
1.2.4
|
Drug – Drug
interactions -
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
21
|
1.2.4.1
|
Pharmacokinetic
interactions
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
22
|
1.2.4.2
|
Pharmacodynamic
interaction
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
28
|
1.2.4.3
|
Undesirable drug interactions
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
31
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
1.2.4.4
|
Controlling
adverse drug interactions
|
|
-
|
-
|
37
|
1.3
|
Diabetes
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
39
|
1.4
|
Malaria
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
48
|
1.5
|
Objectives and
scope of the study
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
55
|
CHAPTER
2 -
|
LITERATURE REVIEW
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
Chemistry of
Chlorpropamide, chloroquine, paracetamol
|
|
|
and promethazine -
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
60
|
2.1.1
|
Chemistry of
chlorpropamide
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
60
|
2.1.2
|
Chemistry of chloroquine
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
62
|
2.1.3
|
Chemistry of
paracetamol
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
63
|
2.1.4
|
Chemistry of promethazine
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
64
|
2.2
|
Pharmacokinetics of chlorpropamide, chloroquine,
|
|
|
|
paracetamol and
promethazine
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
66
|
2.2.1
|
Pharmacokinetics
of chlorpropamide
|
|
-
|
-
|
66
|
2.2.2
|
Pharmacokinetics
of chloroquine
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
66
|
2.2.3
|
Pharmacokinetics
of paracetamol
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
68
|
2.2.4
|
Pharmacokinetics
of promethazine
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
69
|
2.3
|
Pharmacological
actions and mechanism of action of
|
|
|
chlorpropamide,
chloroquine, paracetamol
|
|
|
|
|
and promethazine
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
71
|
2.3.1
|
Pharmacological action
and mechanism of action
|
|
|
|
of chlorpropamide
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
71
|
2.3.2
|
Pharmacological
action and mechanism of action of 73
|
|
|
chloroquine -
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
73
|
2.3.3
|
Pharmacological
action and mechanism of action of
|
|
|
paracetamol
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
75
|
2.3.4
|
Pharmacological
action and mechanism of action
|
|
|
|
of promethazine
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
75
|
2.4
|
Drug – drug interaction studies
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
77
|
2.4.1
|
Controlling
adverse drug interactions -
|
-
|
-
|
83
|
CHAPTER
3
|
-
|
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
|
|
85
|
3.1
|
MATERIALS -
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
85
|
3.1.1
|
Drugs
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
85
|
3.1.2
|
Equipment
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
85
|
3.1.3
|
Reagents
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
88
|
3.1.4
|
Glasswares
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
91
|
3.2
|
METHODS
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
94
|
3.2.1
|
Identification
tests for Chlorpropamide, chloroquine,
|
|
|
paracetamol and
Promethazine tablets
|
-
|
-
|
95
|
3.2.1.1
|
Chlorpropamide
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
95
|
3.2.1.2
|
Chloroquine -
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
95
|
3.2.1.3
|
Promethazine
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
96
|
3.2.1.4
|
Paracetamol
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
97
|
3.2.2
|
Chemical assay of
Chlorpropamide, chloroquine,
|
|
|
|
paracetamol and
Promethazine tablets and their
|
|
|
|
reference standard
powders.
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
98
|
3.2.2.1
|
Paracetamol
tablets
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
98
|
3.2.2.2
|
Chlorpropamide
tablets
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
99
|
3.2.2.3
|
Chloroquine
tablets
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
100
|
3.2.2.4
|
Promethazine
tablets
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
101
|
3.2.3
|
Dissolution rate
test for Chlorpropamide tablets
|
-
|
103
|
3.2.4
|
Solvent
development and optimization studies
|
-
|
104
|
3.2.5
|
Extraction
recoveries
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
106
|
3.2.6
|
Preparation of
standard solutions
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
107
|
3.2.7
|
The pharmacokinetic studies of Chlorpropamide in
|
|
|
|
human subjects
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
108
|
3.2.7.1
|
Subjects
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
108
|
3.2.7.2
|
Study design
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
108
|
3.2.8
|
Drug level analysis
|
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
110
|
3.2.8.1
|
Preparation of
calibration curve -
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
110
|
3.2.8.2
|
Precisions
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
111
|
3.2.9
|
Data analysis
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
111
|
CHAPTER 4 – RESULTS
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
112
|
4.1
|
Identification
tests for
|
Chlorpropamide, chloroquine,
|
|
|
paracetamol and
Promethazine tablets
|
-
|
-
|
112
|
4.1.1
|
Chlorpropamide tablets
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
112
|
4.1.2
|
Chloroquine
tablets
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
112
|
4.1.3
|
Paracetamol
tablets
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
112
|
4.1.4
|
Promethazine
tablets
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
113
|
4.2
|
Chemical assay of
Chlorpropamide, chloroquine,
|
|
|
|
paracetamol and
Promethazine tablets, and their
|
|
|
|
reference standard
powders
|
-
|
|
-
|
-
|
113
|
4.2.1
|
Chlorpropamide tablets
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
113
|
4.2.2
|
Chloroquine
tablets
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
114
|
4.2.3
|
Paracetamol
tablets
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
114
|
4.2.4
|
Promethazine
tablets
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
114
|
4.3
|
Dissolution rate
test of Chlorpropamide
|
-
|
-
|
116
|
4.4
|
Drug level analysis
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
117
|
4.4.1
|
Optimization
studies
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
117
|
4.4.2
|
Extraction from
biological samples
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
124
|
4.4.3
|
Solvent system
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
125
|
4.4.4
|
Chlorpropamide and
chloroquine interaction studies in
|
|
|
human volunteers
group I -
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
130
|
4.4.5
|
Chlorpropamide and
paracetamol interaction studies in
|
|
|
Human volunteers –
group II
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
136
|
4.4.6
|
Chlorpropamide and
promethazine interaction studies
|
|
|
in human
volunteers – group III
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
142
|
CHAPTER
5 – DISCUSSIONS
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
149
|
5.1
|
Quality control of
Chlorpropamide, chloroquine,
|
|
|
|
paracetamol and
Promethazine tablets
|
-
|
-
|
149
|
5.1.1
|
Chlorpropamide
tablets
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
149
|
5.1.2
|
Chloroquine
tablets
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
150
|
5.1.3
|
Paracetamol
tablets
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
151
|
5.1.4
|
Promethazine
tablets
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
152
|
5.2
|
Plasma Drug Level
Analysis
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
152
|
5.3
|
Pharmacokinetics
of Chlorpropamide when co-administered
|
|
with Chloroquine
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
154
|
5.4
|
Pharmacokinetics
of Chlorpropamide when co-administered
|
|
with Paracetamol -
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
156
|
5.5
|
Pharmacokinetics
of Chlorpropamide when co-administered
|
|
with Promethazine
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
157
|
CHAPTER
6 - CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS -
|
158
|
6.1
|
Summary -
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
158
|
| | | | | | | | |
6.2
|
Conclusions -
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
160
|
6.3
|
Recommendations
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
161
|
|
References
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
163
|
|
Appendices
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
180
|
|
LIST OF FIGURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1.4
|
Concentration Vs
time profile for plasma in a
|
|
|
|
first order
|
kinetics
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
7
|
1.2
|
A plot of
concentration Vs time for an orally administered
|
|
drug
|
--
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
13
|
1.2.2
|
Effect of
bioavailability on pharmacological effects.
|
19
|
4.4.1.1
|
Effect of
Acetonitrile on the resolution of chlorpropamide
|
|
and Tolbutamide using solvent system. Acetonitile-water
|
|
|
with
|
Beckman ultraspehe
ODS column (USA)
|
-
|
120
|
4.4.1.2
|
Effect of water on
the resolution of chlorpropamide
|
|
|
and Tolbutamide
using solvent system
|
|
|
|
|
Acetonitrile-water
with
|
Beckman
ultrasphere
|
|
|
|
ODS Column (USA).
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
121
|
4.4.1.3
|
Effect of pH on
the resolution of chlorpropamide
|
|
|
|
and
|
Tolbutamide using
solvent system
|
|
|
|
|
Acetonitrile –
water with Beckman ultrasphere
|
|
|
|
ODS
|
column (USA).
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
122
|
4.4.3.1
|
(a)
|
Chromatogram of
chlorpropamide and
|
|
|
|
tolbutamide
extracted
|
from blank plasma
-
|
-
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
Chromatogram of chlorpropamide extracted from
blank plasma - - - - - - 126
4.4.3.2
|
High performance
liquid chromatogram of an extract
|
|
|
of test sample
obtained from human subjects 4
|
|
|
|
hours following
oral administration of chlorpropamide. -
|
127
|
4.4.3.3
|
Calibration curve for chlorpropamide in plasma using HPLC. 128
|
4.4.4
|
Semi-log plot of
chlorpropamide concentration against
|
|
|
time, following
oral administration of chlorpropamide
|
|
|
(A) and in
|
combination with
|
chloroquine (B) in
|
|
|
|
6 human subjects.
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
135
|
4.4.5
|
Semi-log plot of
chlorpropamide concentration against
|
|
|
time following
oral administration of chlorpropamide
|
|
|
(A) and in
|
combination with
|
paracetamol (B)
|
|
|
|
in 6 human
subjects.
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
141
|
4.4.6
|
Semi-log plot of
chlorpropamide concentration against
|
|
|
time following
oral administration of chlorpropamide
|
|
|
(A) and in
|
combination with
Promethazine (B) in 6
|
|
|
human subjects. -
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIST OF TABLES
|
|
|
|
|
4.2.1
|
Quantitative
determination of chlorpropamide
|
|
|
|
|
tablets and
standard powder.
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
115
|
4.2.2
|
Quantitative
determination of chloroquine tablets and
|
|
|
standard powder.
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
115
|
4.2.3
|
Quantitative
determination of paracetamol tablets
|
|
|
|
and standard
powder -
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
115
|
4.2.4
|
Quantitative
determination of Promethazine tablets
|
|
|
|
end standard
powder
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
116
|
4.3
|
Percentage of the
active ingredient of
|
|
|
|
|
|
chlorpropamide
released in solution.
|
--
|
-
|
-
|
116
|
4.4.1.1 Effect of Acetonitrile on the resolution
of chlorpropamide
|
|
|
and tolbutamide
using solvent system aetonitrile – water
|
|
with Beckman
ultransphere ODS column (USA)
|
-
|
118
|
4.4.1.2
|
Effect of water on
the resolution of chorpropamide and
|
|
|
Tolbutamide using
solvent system acetonitrile-water with
|
|
Beckman ultraspehe
ODS column (USA).
|
-
|
-
|
118
|
4.4.1.3
|
Effect of pH on the resolution of chlorpropamide
|
|
|
|
and Tolbutamide
using solvent system
|
|
|
|
|
Acetonitrile –
Water with Beckman ultrasphere
|
|
|
|
ODS column (USA)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
119
|
4.4.1.4
|
Effect of flowrate
on the resolution of chlorpropamide
|
|
|
and Tolbutamide
using solvent system
|
|
|
|
|
Acetonitrile –
Water with Beckman ultrasphere
|
|
|
|
ODS column (USA)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4.1
|
The mean
percentage extraction recoveries of
|
|
|
|
chlorpropamide
from plasma.
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
4.4.2
|
Precision of the
method of analysis using HPLC method
|
|
|
for within-day and
day-to-day.
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
4.4.3
|
Mean (+SEM) plasma
concentration of chlorpropamide
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in 6 human subjects given chlorpropamide
|
|
|
|
(A) with Chloroquine (B).
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
133
|
4.4.5.1
Mean (+SEM) Pharmacokinetic Parameters of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chlorpropamide
following oral administration of
|
|
|
|
chlorpropamide (A) with chloroquine (B) in six volunteers. -134
|
4.4.5.2
Mean (+ SEM) plasma concentration of chlorpropamide
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in 6 human
subjects given chlorpropamide (A) and
|
|
|
|
with paracetamol
(B) -
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
139
|
4.4.6.1
|
Mean (+SEM)
Pharmacokinetic parameters of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chlorpropamide
following oral administration of
|
|
|
|
chlorpropamide (A)
with paracetamol (B) in six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | |
|
volunteers.
|
-
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
139
|
4.4.6.2
|
Mean (+SEM) Plasma
concentration of chlorpropamide
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in 6 human subjects given chlorpropamide (A) with
|
|
|
promethazine (B).
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
145
|
4.4.6.3
|
Mean (+SEM)
pharmacokinetic parameters of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chlorpropamide
following oral administration of
|
|
|
|
chlorpropamide (A)
with Promethazine (B) in six
|
|
|
|
volunteers.
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
146
|
4.4.6.4
Mean pharmacokinetic parameters of the three study
|
|
|
groups compared.
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIST OF APPENDICES
1.
Plasma concentration of chlorpropamide for
individual subject
in various study
groups. Group I (Chlorpropamide co-administered
with chloroquine) - - - - - - - 180
2.
Plasma concentration of chlorpropamide for
individual subject
in various study
groups. Group II (chlorpropamide co-administered
with paracetamol). - - - - - - 181
3.
Plasma concentration of chlorpropamide for
individual subject in various study groups. Group III (chlorpropamide
co-administered
with promethazine) - - - - - - 182
4.
Pharmacokinetic parameters for individual subjects
in group I
(chlorpropamide co-administered with chloroquine) 183
5.
Pharmacokinetic parameters for individual subjects
in group II (chlorpropamide co-administered with
paracetamol) 184
6.
Pharmacokinetic parameters for individual subjects
in group III
(chlorpropamide co-administered with promethazine) 185
|
|
ABBREVIATIONS
|
Kel
|
-
|
elimination rate
constant
|
Cp
|
-
|
plasma
concentration
|
Clr
|
-
|
clearance
|
Vd
|
-
|
volume of
distribution
|
AUC
|
-
|
area under curve
|
HPLC
|
-
|
High performance Liquid Chlomatography
|
IDDM
|
-
|
insulin dependent
diabetes mellitus
|
NIDDM
|
-
|
Non-insulin
dependent diabetes mellitus
|
uv
|
-
|
Ultraviolet
|
WHO
|
-
|
World Health
Organization
|
Cp
|
-
|
Plasma
Concentration
|
BDH
|
-
|
British Drug House
|
GPR
|
-
|
General Purpose
Reagent.
|
nm
|
-
|
nanometer
|
ml
|
-
|
Millitre
|
g
|
-
|
microgramme
|
CV
|
-
|
Coefficient of
variation
|
SEM
|
-
|
standard error of
the mean
|
BP
|
-
|
British
pharmacopoeia
|
min
|
-
|
Minute
|
0C
|
-
|
degree centigrade
(Celsius)
|
LSD
|
-
|
Least square
difference
|
ANOVA
|
-
|
Analysis of variance
|
NSP
|
-
|
Non-starch
polysacckaride
|
BNF
|
-
|
British National
Formulary
|
MIM
|
-
|
Multilateral
initiative in malaria
|
TDR
|
-
|
Research and Training in Tropical Diseases
|
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Pharmacokinetics
Pharmacokinetics
is the study of the time course of drug and metabolite levels in different
fluids, tissues, and excreta of the body, and of the mathematical relationships
required to develop models to interpret such data (Gibaldi and Perrier, 2004).
Neligan (2006) defined Pharmacokinetics as the study of what the body does to a
drug.
Pharmacokinetics
can also be defined as the study of the time course of drug movement in the
body during absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination (excretion and
biotransformation) (Sadee and Beelen, 1980; Coker, 2001). Pharmacokinetic
studies can be applied for the safe and effective therapeutic management of a
patient. The pharmacokinetic profile of a drug strongly influences its delivery
to biological targets, thereby affecting its efficacy and potential side
effects (Van de water beemd and Gifford, 2003).
The Pharmacokinetics of a compound are typically
understood, analyzed and interpreted in the context of their underlying
absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) processes (Gram,
2003). However, there is no unique mathematical model for any of these
processes, usually a number of different models with different underlying
assumptions, parameterization and applicability are concurrent (Poulin and
Theil, 2002). Absorption is the process by which a drug proceeds from the site
of administration to the site of measurement within the body (Brodie, 2007).
The
routes of drug administration are: oral, intravenous, buccal, sublingual,
rectal, intramuscular, transdermal, subcutaneous, inhalational and topical
(Neligan, 2006). Of all these routes, the usual way of administration is the
oral route (Benet, 1998). The rate of absorption of a drug depends upon its
dissolution characteristics, its ability to pass through biological membranes
and upon a number of physiological variables (gastrointestinal) motility,
presence of food in gastrointestinal tract etc. Apart from physiochemical
properties of the drug (ionization constant, lipid-en water solubility,
molecular radius, diffusion coefficient) also the pharmaceutical formulation
may be of extreme importance in determining rate of absorption (Bozler and Van Rossum, 2002). We have linear and
non-linear absorptions. Linear absorption is the type of absorption whereby the
free diffusion of a drug through biomembranes is the rate limiting step in
absorption. The non-linear absorption is the type of absorption where some
other steps become the rate limiting step. For instance, dissolution of drug in
the gastrointestinal fluid, non-linear phenomenon in the absorption process
will arise (Birkett, 2002). Some drugs require the presence of food in the
gastrointestinal tract to be absorbed, others on the contrary are better
absorbed when taken in an empty stomach (Health Encyclopedia, 2006).
Distribution is the process of reversible transfer of a drug to and from the
site of measurement (Birkett, 2002). Some of the factors that determine the
distribution of a drug in the body are: blood flow; protein binding; and lipid
solubility and the degree of ionization.
1.1.1 Blood flow
When
a drug is introduced into the body, it enters the blood which carries it to the
site of action.
The
tissues with the highest blood flow receive the drug first, before those that
have low blood flow.
1.1.2 Protein binding
Most
drugs bind to proteins, either albumin or alpha-l-acid glycoprotein (AAG), to a
greater or lesser extent (Tillement, 1997). Drugs in their free state travel
throughout the body, in and out of tissues and have their biological effect.
The highly bound drugs have a longer duration of action and a lower volume of
distribution. For a drug that is highly protein bound, loads of it should be
administered to get a therapeutic effect, as so much of it is bound to protein.
The amount of free drug will be increased when another drug competes with a
drug for the binding site on the protein. This is really important for drugs
that are highly protein bound. For instance, if a drug is 97% bound to albumin
and there is a 3% reduction in binding, then the free drug concentration
doubles.
The
binding affinity of a drug for plasma proteins and the number of available
binding sites, are the two factors that determine the degree of plasma protein
binding.
Plasma
protein concentration is proportional to the number of binding sites. Drug
molecules will equilibrate with tissue compartment if plasma protein
concentration decreases. The free drug concentration in the plasma (Cp free) and
tissue (C+ free) as well as the drug concentration bound to pharmacological
active sites in the tissue will increase by an insignificant amount if the
drug's volume of distribution is relatively large.
1.1.3 Lipid solubility and the degree of ionization
Highly
ionized drugs cannot cross lipid membranes and unionized drugs can cross
freely. Morphine is highly ionized, fentanyl is the opposite. Consequently the
latter has a faster onset of action. The degree of ionization depends on the
pKa of the drug and the pH of the local environment.
Most
drugs are either weak acids or weak bases. Acids are most highly ionized at a
high pH (i.e in an alkaline environment). Bases are most highly ionized in an
acidic environment (low pH). For a weak acid, the more acidic the environment,
the less ionized the drug, and the more easily it crosses lipid membranes. Weak
bases have the opposite effect (Neligan, 2006).
1.1.4 Volume of distribution (Vd)
Is the amount of
drug in the body divided by the concentration in
the blood (Gillian,
2001).
Volume of
distribution can also be defined as the amount of drug in
the body relative to
the concentration of drug in the blood (or
plasma) (Rowland and
Tozer, 1980).
Vd = D
Cp
Where Vd is the
apparent volume of distribution, D is the drug dose,
and Cp is the plasma
concentration of the drug.
Drugs that are
highly lipid soluble, such as digoxin, have a very high
volume of
distribution (500 litres). Drugs which are lipid insoluble,
such as
neuromuscular blockers, remain in the blood, and have a
low volume of distribution.
Plasma
concentration (Cp) is the sum of drug that is bound to plasma protein plus drug
that is unbound or free. The free or unbound drug is the pharmacologically
active moiety, as it is in equilibrium with the receptor site.
Plasma
drug concentration can be used to evaluate the adequacy or potential toxicity
of a prescribed dosage regimen.
Pharmacokinetic calculations can be sued to modify dosing regimes
so as to maximize the therapeutic response while
minimizing the risk
of toxicity (Mary
and Lloyd, 1992).
Steady-state
concentration is the drug concentration at which the body is in equilibrium
(i.e the rates of drug absorption and elimination are equal). Elimination is
the irreversible loss of drug from the site of measurement. A constant fraction
of the drug in the body is eliminated per unit time. The rate of elimination is
proportional to the amount of drug in the body.
The fraction of the drug in the body eliminated per
unit time is determined by the elimination constant (Kel).
This is represented by
the
slope of the line of the log plasma concentration versus time (Regina, et al,
2006).
Rate
of elimination = clearance x concentration in the blood. Elimination rate
constant (kel)
is a function of the drugs volume of
distribution
and its clearance. It can be calculated by dividing the clearance of the drug
by its volume of distribution.
Kel = Clr
Vd
Where Kel is the elimination constant, Clr is the
clearance, while Vd
is
the volume of distribution. The elimination rate constant is utilized to
predict how the plasma concentration varies with time, assuming no additional
drug is added. For example, if Cp1
is the initial plasma
concentration and Cp2 is the plasma
concentration after an interval
of decays, Cp2 can be calculated
using the elimination rate constant.
Cp2 = Cp1 e-Kelt
e-Kelt
is the fraction of the initial plasma concentration which is remaining at the
end of the time interval.
Most drugs are eliminated by renal excretion and
metabolism. The clearance (Clr) of a drug is the volume of plasma from which
the drug is completely removed per unit time. Clearance is a proportionality
constant which makes the rate of drug elimination equal to the rate of drug
administration at steady state (Mary and Lloyd, 1992).
Clearance = elimination constant x volume of
distribution
Clr = Kel x Vd
(Neligan, 2006;
Regina, et al, 2006).
Increased
clearance reduces the AUC (AUC: Area Under Curve) after single drug
doses, and leads to a reduced mean steady state concentration during multiple
dose therapy.
Decreased
drug clearance will increase the AUC
during single or multiple drug doses and lead to higher plasma concentration
during chronic therapy. Total clearance is equal to the sum of the individual
clearances for renal excretion and metabolism.
Total clearance = renal clearance + metabolic clearance
Excretion is the
irreversible loss of the chemically unchanged drug.
Drug loss by the kidneys is determined by the next
effects of glomerular filtration, tubular secretion and tubular reabsorption.
Glomerular filtration is not greatly influenced by other drugs, although
displacement from protein binding sites may lead to increased concentration of
drug in glomerular fluid and enhanced renal elimination.
The
pH of the tubular fluid is a determinant of drug's reabsorption. The clearance
of acidic drugs is greater in an alkaline urine, while the clearance of basic
drugs is more rapid in acidic urine (Solomon, 2000). Drug metabolism is the
conversion of one chemical species to another. Metabolism terminates a drug's
effects, as drug metabolites are usually devoid of pharmacological activity.
Metabolism
of drugs can lead to the formation of polar (lipid-insoluble) derivatives which
can undergo renal excretion. Many commonly used drugs are oxidized in the
hepatic endoplasmic reticulum (Smith, 2001). Elimination half-life (t1/2el)
is the time taken
for plasma
concentration to reduce by 50%.
The half-life of a drug is dependent upon its
volume of distribution and clearance. The relationship is as follows:
Kel = the log of 2 divided bv the t1/2el = 0.693
t1/2el
Likewise, Clr
|
=
|
Kel x Vd
|
So, Clr
|
=
|
|
0.693 x Vd
|
|
|
|
|
|
t1/2el
|
And then, t1/2el =
|
|
|
0.693 x Vd
|
|
|
|
Clr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
half-life of a drug is of importance during maintenance therapy, to estimate
the dosing interval. It can be used to predict the time it will take for a
patient on a constant dosage regimen to reach a steady state. It can also be
used to predict the time it will take for all the drug to be eliminated from
the body.
1.2 Drug
bioavailability and its relationship to clinical
effectiveness
Bioavailability
is the fraction of the administered dose that reaches the systemic circulation
(Gibaldi and Perrier, 2004). It can also be said to be the rate and extent to
which the active drug ingredient is absorbed at the site of action.
Bioavailability is 100% for intravenous injection
but varies for other routes of drug administration. For a drug administered
orally, the bioavailability is the area under the curve of a plot of plasma
concentration versus time, as shown in the diagram below (Fig. 2).
Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects
FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!
+(234) 0814 780 1594
Buyers has the right to create
dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when
you experience issue with the file received.
Dispute can only be created when
you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of
contents and content of the file you received.
ProjectShelve.com shall either
provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or
send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and
Conditions are applied.
Buyers are expected to confirm
that the material you are paying for is available on our website
ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone
through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE
BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.
In case of payment for a
material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of
ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that
is available on our website within 48 hours.
You cannot change topic after
receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.
Login To Comment