ABSTRACT
Examination misconduct has become a global issue especially with regard to Africa countries, several times this issue brought up some cases where by a person can obtain a qualification and can't depend it. This study is aimed at analysing the internal as well as the external forces which lead to examination misconduct. In much of our tertiary institutions specifically the area of study, Jigawa state higher institutions. The causes go beyond the institutional forces nor the students but also the government as many government officials inspired a sense of corrupting lecturers for their study advancement just to obtain the qualifications for their job promotion. Moreover, the others force as outlined under this study are: poor renumeration, poor condition for learning and illicit mind of corruption that we do have. In this case, to promote effective and reduce the levels of examination misconduct, the government has to regulate the secondary school’s education before the high institution. Albert Bandura Social learning theory was used in this research as it has relevant on the topic of discussions. The methodology adopted by this study is secondary sources of data whereas different text, journals, magazines, handbooks and Google scholars were used to obtained the relevant data. Philosophy of examination ethic project had become the less transferred the students this is the story institutions where examination ethics society of Nigeria have been from students now seen type of malpractice as enemies of the society. The campaign for examination ethics is war between examination ethics crusaders and examination malpractice syndicate; have penetrated all institutions. There are everywhere and include some parent’s teachers, examination paper workers in examination bodies council, civil servant in educational ministries and parents school proprietors the crusader have to fight the syndicates every of the way. Akere (2017) view on the impact of examination ethics project on the conducts in the faculty prove a progressive posture. It solution all crusaders who have been making sacrifices to save this country from the clutches of examination syndicates. This politic professor expressed his profound gratitude for all determined comrade of the crusade who midst of threads, intimidation and public embracement have preserve unity now. As part of the crusades determination to stamp out syndicates the inauguration of the programme will move down to primary school, college of educations, polytechnics and universities within the respective, states.
Keywords: Examination, Misconduct, Academic Performance, Institution, Jigawa State Polytechnic, Dutse
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Title
Page .................................................................................................................. ………i
Declaration
........................................................................................................................ ii
Certification
....................................................................................................................... iii
Approval
Page
.................................................................................................................... iv
Dedication
......................................................................................................................... v
Acknowledgements
............................................................................................................ vi
Table
of Contents
................................................................................................................ vii
Abstract
.............................................................................................................................. ix
RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study .............................................................................................. 1
1.2 Statement of the Problem .............................................................................................. 2
1.3 Aim and Objectives of the Study .................................................................................. 2
1.4 Research Questions ....................................................................................................... 3
1.5 Significance of the Study ............................................................................................. 3
1.6 Scope and Limitations of the Study ............................................................................. 4
1.7 Historical Background of the Study Area .................................................................... 4
1.8 Definition of Key Terms ............................................................................................... 5
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 8
2.2 Theoretical Framework ................................................................................................. 11
2.3 Theory of planned behavior ......................................................................................... 13
2.4 Institution’s factors related to examination malpractice................................................ 17
2.5 Lecturer’s factors related to examination malpractice .................................................. 18
2.6 Student’s factors related to examination malpractice ................................................... 19
2.7 Effects of examination misconduct on students’ academic success .............................. 20
2.8 Method of Examination Misconduct ............................................................................. 21
2.9 Academic misconduct and punishment ......................................................................... 23
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research Design ..................................................................................................... 27
3.2 Population of the Study ........................................................................................ 27
3.3 Sample Size ........................................................................................................ …...... 28
3.4 Sampling Techniques ........................................................................................... 30
3.5 Method of Data Collection .................................................................................... 31
3.6 Research Instrument .............................................................................................. 31
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... …… 32
4.2 Demographic Characteristics of Respondents ........................................................ 32
4.3 Responses of the Respondents …………………………………................................ 35
4.4 Findings .............................................................................................................. ………46
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND Summary
............................................................................................................ ……….47
5.2 Conclusion
.......................................................................................................... ……….47
5.3 Recommendations
............................................................................................... ……… 48
References
................................................................................................................ ……….49
Appendix I: Questionnaire
.......................................................................................... 55
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background to the Study
Education is fundamental in
developing the skills and competencies that prepare students for personal and
professional growth. However, the prevalence of examination malpractice in
educational institutions possess a significant threat to the integrity and value
of educational assessments. Examination malpractice, defined as any unethical
behavior or act that gives an unfair advantage during assessments, distorts
academic standards and can have a long-term impact on students' lives and the
reputation of institutions (Akinade, 2015; Onah, 2020).
In Nigeria, this issue has become
particularly pervasive, affecting not only primary and secondary schools but
also higher institutions like polytechnics and universities. The normalization
of malpractice in examinations has led to a range of academic challenges,
including deteriorating educational quality and the emergence of graduates
whose skills do not align with the qualifications they possess. Recent studies
show that factors such as societal expectations, pressure to succeed, lack of
preparation, and inadequate enforcement of academic integrity policies
contribute to the persistence of malpractice (Audu, 2017; Mohammed & Bello,
2019).
At Jigawa State Polytechnic, Dutse,
examination malpractice has been identified as a recurring issue that hinders
academic integrity and impacts the quality of graduates. This institution, like
many others, has established guidelines to prevent and penalize malpractice.
However, the persistence of such behaviors suggests that existing measures may
be insufficient or improperly enforced. Consequently, students who engage in
malpractice may graduate without the necessary skills, creating a mismatch
between their credentials and actual competencies, which can affect both their
employability and the Polytechnic's reputation (Eze & Abubakar, 2020).
This study, therefore, aims to
assess the effect of examination malpractice on academic performance at Jigawa
State Polytechnic, Dutse, exploring the causes and proposing recommendations to
curb this issue. By understanding these elements, the study aims to contribute
to a more ethical and effective academic environment.
1.2
Statement of the Problem
The problem of examination misconduct
at Jigawa State Polytechnic, Dutse, has raised significant concerns among
educators, administrators, and employers. While this issue is not unique to the
Polytechnic, its impact on student outcomes and institutional credibility makes
it particularly troubling. Examination misconduct not only compromises the
fairness and accuracy of student evaluations but also leads to a chain of
negative effects on academic performance, morale, and the overall learning
environment.
Students who resort to unethical
practices in exams often do so due to multiple factors, including fear of
failure, inadequate preparation, and external pressures to succeed
academically. However, the consequences are far-reaching: students may attain
grades that do not reflect their actual knowledge, skills, or competencies.
This misalignment becomes evident in the workforce, where graduates struggle to
meet the performance standards expected of their qualifications. Moreover,
examination misconduct undermines the institution’s reputation, as prospective
employers may lose confidence in the capabilities of the Polytechnic's
graduates.
To address this issue, it is crucial
to investigate the root causes of examination misconduct at Jigawa State
Polytechnic, evaluate its effects on academic performance, and analyze the
effectiveness of current anti-malpractice measures. This research problem is
therefore centered on the need to provide data-driven insights and recommend
feasible solutions to mitigate examination misconduct in the institution.
1.3
Aim and Objectives of the Study
The study aims to assess the effects
of examination misconduct on students' academic performance at Jigawa State
Polytechnic, Dutse.
Objectives:
1. To identify the causes of
examination misconduct within Jigawa State Polytechnic specifically college of
business and management studies.
2. To evaluate the effect of
examination misconduct on the academic performance of students.
3. To assess the effectiveness of
existing preventive measures against examination misconduct within the
institution.
4. To examine the impact of orientation
and guidance on issues related to exam misconduct.
1.4
Research Questions
This study is guided by the
following research questions:
- What
are the primary causes of examination misconduct at Jigawa State
Polytechnic?
- How
does examination misconduct affect the academic performance of students at
Jigawa State Polytechnic?
- What
measures are currently in place to prevent examination misconduct, and how
effective are these measures?
- Does
the student of Jigawa state polytechnic received orientation on examination
misconduct and related issues?
1.5
Significance of the Study
This study holds significant
importance for stakeholders across the educational sector. By examining the
root causes and effect of examination misconduct, this research will benefit educators,
administrators, and policymakers, providing insights that may lead to the
formulation of policies aimed at reducing misconduct incidences, more
especially the institution. For educators, understanding the factors
contributing to misconduct can inform strategies to improve teaching/lecturing
methods, assessment standards, and academic integrity.
For Jigawa State Polytechnic, the
findings of this study could serve as a basis for enhancing institutional
policies that deter examination misconduct, henceforth, there is student
handbook which provided for all. Thereby safeguarding the institution’s
reputation and ensuring that students' academic achievements accurately reflect
their capabilities. Furthermore, for students, the study will help underscore
the importance of ethical conduct, fostering a culture of honesty and
self-reliance in academic pursuits.
1.6
Scope and Limitation of the Study
This study focuses specifically on
Jigawa State Polytechnic, Dutse, examining selected college, CBMS within the
institution to obtain a representative understanding of examination misconduct
issues. The scope covers various factors that contribute to misconduct, its
impact on students’ academic outcomes, and the effectiveness of current
policies aimed at preventing unethical practices.
However, this study may face certain
limitations. Firstly, the sensitive nature of examination misconduct could
result in reluctance among respondents to provide complete or truthful
responses. Additionally, time and resource constraints may limit the breadth of
data collection and analysis. These limitations will be acknowledged, and
efforts will be made to mitigate their impact on the research findings.
1.7 Historical Background of the Study Area
Following the creation of Jigawa on
the 27 august,1991 from old kano state, the Jigawa state polytechnic was
established in December,1992 with central administration at kazaure. The
polytechnic consisted of four colleges namely; college of business and
management studies, dutse, college of engineering, and technology, kazaure,
college of agriculture, hadejia and college of legal and Islamic studies
Ringim.
Later, the state government renamed
the polytechnic after the late emir of kazaure, Alhaji Husaini Adamu.
In 2005, college of legal and
Islamic studies, Ringim gained autonomy. Sequel to this development, the
polytechnic was left with three colleges; college of business and management
studies, dutse, college of engineering and technology Kazaure and college of
agriculture, Hadejia.
In the year 2007, the federal
government took over the then college of engineering and technology and the
central administration at Kazaure as Husaini Adamu federal polytechnic.
Consequent upon this development,
the college of agriculture, Hadejia was granted autonomy as a mono technic
institution by the state government, as such the state was left with only the
college of business and management
studies, Dutse. A situation which fell short of the National Board for
Technical Education.
(NBTE) requirements of science- art
ratio of (70:30) for the establishment of a full-fledged polytechnic.
In view of the above, therefore, the
Jigawa state government enacted a law for the establishment of the present
polytechnic with three colleges namely; college of business and management
studies (CBMS), college of Engineering and environment studies (CEES) and
college of science and technology (CST) with the central administration at
dutse.
The institution has gradually
expended over the years and graduated students who excelled in various fields
of human endeavor.
1.8
Definition of Key Terms and Concepts
Academic Dishonesty: A broader term that encompasses
all forms of cheating, plagiarism, falsification of information, and unethical
behaviors in academic settings. It directly undermines the value of education
and erodes trust within the institution.
Academic Performance: The degree to which a student
meets the objectives of their educational program, often measured through
grades, test scores, or GPA. Academic performance reflects the knowledge and
skills gained by students and can be influenced by a variety of factors,
including study habits, preparation, and ethical conduct in assessments (Audu,
2019).
Cheating: A specific type of examination
malpractice where students engage in unauthorized acts to gain an advantage
during assessments. This can include copying from another student, bringing
notes into an exam, or using technological devices to access answers (Eze &
Abubakar, 2020).
Collusion: This involves unauthorized
cooperation between students, or between students and exam officials, to
influence the outcome of an examination. Collusion can undermine individual
assessment accuracy and compromise the fairness of the examination process.
Credential Inflation: A situation where the value of
educational qualifications decreases due to widespread academic dishonesty,
leading to skepticism from employers and stakeholders about graduates'
competencies and skills.
Educational Assessment: A systematic process of documenting,
usually in measurable terms, knowledge, skills, attitudes, and beliefs. In an
academic setting, assessments are used to evaluate students' learning and
performance (Yakubu, 2022).
Examination Malpractice: This refers to any intentional,
unethical behavior during examinations aimed at obtaining an unfair advantage.
This includes actions such as copying from unauthorized sources, collusion with
other students or invigilators, impersonation, and the use of prohibited
materials or technology during exams (Obasi & Okeke, 2017).
Institutional Reputation: The public perception and trust in
an educational institution's integrity, quality, and academic standards.
Frequent cases of examination malpractice can tarnish an institution’s
reputation and affect its students' employability.
Integrity: In the academic context, integrity
refers to the adherence to ethical principles and honesty, particularly in
completing assignments, tests, and other assessments. It involves conducting
oneself in a manner that upholds trustworthiness, fairness, and respect for the
learning process (Mohammed & Bello, 2020).
Invigilation: The supervision of students during
an examination to ensure that all rules and regulations are followed. Effective
invigilation helps prevent examination malpractice by maintaining a fair and
controlled environment.
Polytechnic: An institution of higher learning
that offers vocational and technical education alongside academic programs.
Polytechnics are particularly focused on providing practical skills training
for various technical professions.
Sanctions: The penalties or disciplinary
actions imposed on students or staff found guilty of engaging in examination
malpractice or other forms of academic dishonesty. Sanctions can range from
warnings to suspension, expulsion, or even criminal prosecution, depending on
the severity of the offense and institutional policies (Onah, 2020).
Student Engagement: The level of interest, motivation,
and involvement a student demonstrates toward their studies. Higher levels of
engagement are linked to better academic performance and a decreased likelihood
of resorting to malpractice.
Study Habits: These refer to the consistent
practices or routines students adopt to learn or retain information, including
time management, note-taking, and exam preparation. Good study habits are known
to improve academic performance and reduce reliance on malpractice (John &
Musa, 2018).
Unethical Practices: Actions or behaviors that violate
accepted ethical norms or standards in a given context, including academic
settings. In examinations, unethical practices include any form of cheating,
dishonesty, or unauthorized aid that gives one or more students an advantage
over others (Akinade, 2015).
Login To Comment