SEMANTIC MEMORY CUES AND LANGUAGE EXPERIENCE APPROACHES ON ACHIEVEMENT, INTEREST AND PERCEIVED SELF-EFFICACY IN READING COMPREHENSION OF PUPILS IN IMO STATE

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00007031

No of Pages: 239

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

$20

ABSTRACT

 

This study investigated semantic memory cues and language experience approach on achievement, interest and self-efficacy in reading comprehension of pupils in Imo State. The study was guided by twelve research questions and twelve null hypotheses. The study adopted a non-equivalent pre-test, post-test control group quasi-experimental research design using 3x2 factorial matrix. A total sample of 174 subjects drawn using multi-sampling techniques from a population of 154,586 (79,509 males and 75,077 females) primary five pupils in public primary schools in 2018/2019 academic session in Imo State was used for the study. Three instruments namely: Test of comprehension (TOC) forms 1 & 11, Pupils’ reading comprehension interest rating scale (PRCIRS) and Pupils’ Self-efficacy Rating Scale (PSERS) were developed, validated and used for the study. The Internal consistency reliability coefficients were determined for the three instruments. The calculated reliability coefficient estimates for test of comprehension forms I and II were 0.91 and 0.89 respectively, while the estimates for the Pupils Reading Comprehension Interest Rating Scale and Pupils’ Self-Efficacy Rating Scale were 0.89 and 0.86 respectively. The instruments were administered on the pupils and were analyzed in line with the research questions and hypotheses. Descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation were used in answering the research questions while Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to test the null hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance which revealed the following findings: Intervention using semantic memory cue teaching strategy significantly improved the achievement, interest and self-efficacy in reading comprehension of primary school pupils. Language experience approach teaching strategy significantly improved the achievement, interest and self-efficacy of primary school pupils. However, gender of the primary school pupils did not significantly influence the achievement, interest and self-efficacy of primary school pupils in reading comprehension when taught with semantic memory cue teaching strategy and language experience approaches. Among the educational implications of the study was that the achievement, interest and self-efficacy of primary school pupils depend on the use of semantic memory cues and language experience approaches. It was thus recommended that teachers should be taught how to help students acquire skills required in the use of semantic memory cues and language experience approaches.





TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Title page                                                                                            ii

Declaration                                                                                          iii

Certification                                                                                        iv

Dedication                                                                                          v

Acknowledgements                                                                            vi

Table of Contents                                                                               vii

List of Tables                                                                                      ix

Abstract                                                                                              xii       

 

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION

1.1              Background to the Study                                                       1

1.2              Statement of the Problem                                                       9

1.3              Purpose of the Study                                                              10

1.4              Significance of the Study                                                       11

1.5              Research Questions                                                                 14

1.6              Hypotheses                                                                             16

1.7              Scope of the Study                                                                 17

CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE  19

2.1       Conceptual Framework                                                           19

2.1.1    Objectives of teaching reading comprehension in

primary schools in Nigeria                                                      19

2.1.2     Concept and nature of language experience approach          27

2.1.3    Concept of reading comprehension                                        34

2.1.4    Concept of academic achievement                                         41

2.1.5    Concept of interest                                                                 48

2.1.6    Concept of self-efficacy                                                         49

2.1.7    Concept of gender                                                                  56

2.1.8    Concept of gender                                                                  59

2.2       Theoretical Framework                                                           61

2.2.1    The multi store theory of memory                                          61

2.2.2    Self-determination theory                                                       62

2.2.3    Social cognitive theory                                                           66

2.3       Review of Empirical Studies                                                  69

2.4       Summary of Literature Review                                              80

CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY                                     82

3.1       Design of the Study                                                                83

3.2       Area of the Study                                                                   84

3.3       Population of the Study                                                          85

3.4       Sample and Sampling Technique                                            85

3.5       Instrument for Data Collection                                               87

3.6       Validation of the Instrument                                                  88

3.7       Method of Data Analysis                                                       89

3.8       Control of Extraneous Variables                                            90

3.9       Method of Data Analysis                                                       94

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                            95       

4.1       Results                                                                                    95

4.2       Summary of Major Findings                                                   120     

4.3       Discussion of Findings                                                           121                 

CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION  

5.1       Summary                                                                                 129     

5.2       Conclusion                                                                              132     

5.3       Recommendations                                                                  132                 

5.4       Educational Implication of the Study                                    134     

5.5       Limitation of the Study                                                          136     

5.6       Suggestions for Further Study                                                136      REFERENCES

APPENDICES

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIST OF TABLES

Table                                                                                                  Page

4.1:      Mean achievement scores of pupils in reading

comprehension exposed to semantic cues and

conventional teaching method                                                            95

 

4.2:      Analysis of covariance for achievement mean

scores of pupils in reading of comprehension

taught using the semantic memory cues and

conventional teaching method                                                            96

 

4.3:      Mean achievement scores of pupils in reading

comprehension exposed to  language experience

approach and conventional teaching method                                     97

 

4.4:        Analysis of covariance for achievement mean

scores of pupils in reading of comprehension

taught using the language experience approach

and conventional teaching method.                                                  98

 

4.5:      The interest scores of pupils in reading comprehension

exposed  semantic cues and conventional teaching

method                                                                                                            99

 

4.6:      Analysis of covariance for mean interest scores

of pupils in reading of comprehension taught

using the semantic memory  cues and

conventional teaching method                                                            100

 

4.7:     Mean and standard deviation differences in the

mean interest scores of pupils in reading

comprehension exposed semantic cues and

           conventional teaching method                                                            101

 

4.8:      Analysis of covariance for mean interest scores

of pupils in reading of comprehension taught

using the language experience approach

and conventional teaching method                                                     102

 

4.9:     The self-efficacy mean scores of pupils in reading

comprehension exposed the semantic cues

and conventional teaching method                                                     103

 

4.10:    Analysis of covariance for mean self-efficacy

            scores of pupils in reading of comprehension

            taught using the sematic memory cue and

            conventional teaching method                                                            104

 

 

4.11:   Mean and standard deviation differences in the

mean self-efficacy scores of pupils in

reading comprehension exposed semantic

            cues and conventional teaching method                                            105

 

4.12:    Analysis of covariance for mean self-efficacy

scores of pupils in reading of comprehension

taught using the language experience

approach and conventional teaching method                                     106

 

4.13:    Pre-test and posttest mean achievement score

and standard deviations scores of male and

female pupils in reading comprehension

taught using the semantic approach cue                                             107

 

4.14:    Analysis of covariance for achievement mean

scores of male and female pupils in reading of

comprehension taught using the semantic

memory cues                                                                                       108

 

4.15:     Pre-test and posttest mean achievement score

 and standard deviations scores of male and female

 pupils in reading comprehension taught using

  the language experience approach                                                    109

 

4.16:     Analysis of covariance for mean achievement

             scores of male and female pupils in reading

             of comprehension taught using the language

             experience approach                                                                           110

 

4.17:     Pre-test and posttest mean interest score and

 standard deviations scores of male and female

 pupils in reading comprehension taught using

 the semantic memory cues                                                                 111

 

4.18:     Analysis of covariance for mean interest scores

 of male and female pupils in reading comprehension

 taught using the semantic memory cues                                            112

 

4.19:     Pre-test and posttest interest score and standard

 deviations scores of male and female

 pupils in reading comprehension taught

 using the language experience approach                                            113

 

4.20:     Analysis of covariance for mean interest scores

 of male and female pupils in reading of comprehension

 taught using  the language experience approach                                114

 

 

4.21:     Pre-test and posttest mean self-efficacy scores of

 male and female pupils in reading comprehension

  taught using the semantic approach cue                                           115

 

4.22:     Analysis of covariance for mean self-efficacy

             scores of male and female pupils in reading

             of comprehension taught using

             the semantic memory cues                                                                 116

 

4.23:     Pre-test and posttest self-efficacy scores of

             male and female pupils in reading comprehension

             taught using the  language experience approach                                117

 

4.24:     Analysis of covariance for mean self-efficacy

 scores of male and female pupils in   reading of

 comprehension  taught using the language

 experience approach                                                                           119

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION


1.1       BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY

Learners may have problems of understanding what they read. Learners’ ability to comprehend what they read depends on their acquisition of reading skills. Reading skills, according to Colorado (2017), range from summarizing, sequencing, inference, drawing conclusion, self-questioning, problem solving, relating background knowledge, distinguishing between facts and opinions, and finding main ideas. Reading for comprehension helps pupils to construct meaning from texts, as well as to examine and extend the meaning of the text (Presley, 2016). Nnachi (2010) defines reading comprehension as the ability and skill to understand a reading passage. Snow and Burns (2015) opined that reading comprehension should be defined as a process of getting meaning from print, using knowledge about the written alphabet and about the sound structure of oral language for purpose of achieving understanding.

 

Reading involves the process of encoding and processing information by relating incoming information to the already stored information or ideas (Colorado, 2017).It is an attempt at understanding a text that is read or the process of constructing meaning from a text. Difficulty in comprehending deprives readers the opportunity of understanding what the writer is trying to convey. It hinders the reader’s ability to transfer knowledge, learn new skills or gain pleasure from text or messages. Poor reading skill denies readers chance of gathering information which helps them to function efficiently in the society they belong (Michael, 2016).

The problem of poor reading comprehension becomes more compounding when one considers that most of Nigerian children are from rural settings that are not rich in intellectual stimulation. Rural children in this context refer to those from the rural community. Such children come to school having not been exposed to the rudiments of reading skills and as such they show evidence of inability to read a given texts with facility (Opara 2018). Ubahakwe (2018) also argued that inability to read with understanding does not affect only the Nigerian rural children. In urban areas the situation is the same. Succinctly, some children in the urban setting show evidence of not been exposed to the rudiments of reading comprehension skills and evidence of inability to read a given text with facility. In line with this, Ubahakwe (2018), Ajayi (2017) and Nwachukwu (2017) concluded that reading for comprehension is problematic enough even for the urban Nigerian child because of the bilingual and multilingual situations in the country. In this regard, Agulanna (1992) stated that inability to read affects the child’s academic performance and capsizes his self-concept such that he approaches the learning task with increased lack of confidence especially as he grows up. In other words, success in school requires that learners read for comprehension. Evidence abound of poor achievement in subjects that require reading for understanding such as English language, Mathematics, Primary Science, Social Studies among others (Nwachukwu, 2017). The academic achievement of a child could be defined as the learning outcome of the child. This includes the knowledge, skills and ideas acquired and trained through the course of study within and outside the classroom situations (Epunam, 2009).

 In spite of the importance of primary education in the survival of the whole educational system and national development, the achievement of pupils in internal examinations and the transition examination into junior secondary schools in Imo State in the past four years (2014-2017) has been declining steadily. For instance, a close analysis of the results of the transition examination into junior secondary schools for the years 2014-2017 shows that only 56%, 53%, 48% and 38% of the pupils respectively passed well enough to be given admission into junior secondary schools (Ministry of Education, MOE, Imo State, 2014-2017). Many others were pushed into the junior secondary schools because of the nine year basic education programme in the country which provides for only one percent failure in each grade. The observed poor achievement of pupils in the transition examination was related to poor reading comprehension which was suspected to be linked with ineffective teaching (Ogbu, 2018). Akinbola (2009) indicated that ineffective teaching methods used by most teachers for instructional delivery could decrease pupils’ interest in learning. Akinbola (2009) noted that the continuous use of conventional teaching method is responsible for learners’ poor achievement. According to Oranu (2009), conventional teaching methods such as lecture and demonstration are regarded as content driven and certainly not learner centered.

 

Conventional teaching methods are teacher-centered and predominantly used for instructional delivery in Nigerian schools, including primary schools (Okon, 2009). Okon (2009) maintained that conventional teaching methods, relative to modern instructional techniques are not challenging enough to the academic needs of the learners. Barnstein (2009) stated that modern instructional techniques are more effective and interactive, especially for any child at primary school level. This situation has continued to create concern in the minds of teachers, parents, curriculum experts and evaluators especially because of the importance of primary education in the survival of the whole educational system and national development.

The importance of primary education may have led the Federal Republic of Nigeria (FRN, 2013) to explain in the National Policy on Education (NPE) that primary education is referred to as the education given in an institution for children aged six (6) to eleven (11) years plus. Primary school education is the foundation upon which all other levels of education are built. A primary five child is a pupil aged 10 years plus and is in the first level of education where most Nigerian children come in contact with formal education. Primary school education is the bed-rock for success of other levels of education (FRN, 2013). Primary education plays a crucial formative role in the survival of the whole educational system.

 

A number of conferences and workshops have been organized with a view to addressing the problem of poor achievement of children in primary schools in subjects that require reading for understanding such as English language, Mathematics, Primary Science, Social Studies and so on. As a result, a number of strategies have been recommended for teaching so that pupils can learn better. These include: enquiry-discovery method (Ekpo, 2009); Use of information and communication technology (ICT) in the classroom (Olorundare, 2009); Use of reciprocal peer tutoring (Uroko, 2010) and Use of elaborative interrogation (Ezeahurukwe, 2010). All these recommended approaches look quite interesting in their theoretical orientation but evidence shows that the problems are still prevalent as could be seen from the Imo State Ministry of Education’s (2014 -2017) transition examination results into junior secondary schools. The poor achievement becomes more worrisome when one considers the literature evidence that seems to suggest that the weaknesses of the candidates were traced to inability to read, comprehend and answer the questions correctly (Ekpo, 2009; Uroko, 2010; Ezeahurukwe, 2010). These made candidates to provide answers that were wrong. The problem was more obvious in comprehension exercises in English Language where they were required to read and draw inferences since the answers were not given. The reports have it that pupils lost a lot of marks as a result of lifting “seeming answers” from the passage, and that many pupils were yet to come to grips with the skills of comprehension (Ministry of Education, MOE, Imo State, 2014-2017).

 

Literature reports emanating from Western Europe tend to suggest that semantic cues and language experience approaches have the potential of helping pupils to understand what they read (Eysenck & Keane, 2009).Semantic memory approach is concerned with the meaning of words, pronunciation, how they are put together to construct tenses and phrases. It is the organized knowledge about the world. Semantic is a grammatical word referring to the rules governing the meaning of words or sentences in a language (Nnachi, 2007). Semantic rules permit the language users to convey the sublets of nuisances (Feldman, 2009). Accordingly, one can differentiate the meanings of words and sentences in a grammar according to sounds and usage. Eysenck and Keane (2009) expressed the view that semantic memory is always organized to help the pronunciations and construction of tenses and phrases.

 

Agulanna (2018) is of the view that semantic memory approach contains the facts and general information that one knows such as abstractions, concepts, rules and how to use them in problem solving and learning procedures. She further stated that many things taught in the school system are retained in the semantic memory. Cues in this context are guides that will stimulate a child to recall what he has stored in the semantic memory and it facilitates recall from the semantic memory. They act like catalogues used in locating books in the library. Furthermore, language experience approach is also a method or approach that may be used to help the child acquire reading comprehension skills. It is an approach that involves the child in the quest of acquiring reading comprehension skills (Okpara 2018). The child is motivated to express his experiences through writing a story in his own language. This may assist the child to read his experience as directed by the instructor or as documented by himself. According to Howlett (2009) language experience approach brings together writing, reading, art and language. It helps the learners understand that what he thinks and says can be written down. The child will enjoy reading his thoughts that have been written down.

 

The language experience approach is based on Social Cognitive Theory (Self-efficacy) by Bandura (1977) which emphasized on imitation in language learning. Social learning theory shows that it is plausible that young children learn language by imitating the speech of their parents, siblings, peers and other significant others (Goldfien, 2009). Although imitation may contribute to the acquisition of language, there are individual differences in its nature and extent (Bloom 1973). One therefore wonders the extent the pupils’ interaction during the semantic memory cues and language experience approach would support multi store theory and social learning theory.

In this respect, semantic memory cues and language experience approaches have some research evidence in support of their potential effectiveness in some western countries (Fisher, 2009; Allen, 2009; Oczkus, 2009; Esteve, 2009), little studies seem to be available here in Nigeria especially in Imo State. It is important that these approaches be tried out in Imo State to determine the extent of their effectiveness in improving the reading comprehension achievement of primary school pupils.      

In adopting semantic memory cues and language experience approaches as instructional strategies, other observed factors that can influence the pupils’ participation in the tutor/tutee procedure such as interest, self-efficacy and gender need to be addressed. Interest as viewed by Nekang (2009) is an emotionally oriented behaviour trait, which determines pupils’ energy and enthusiasm in tackling educational programmes or other activities. Okoye (2009) looked at interest as a kind of feeling which one has for something which is valuable and beneficial.

Interest is a necessary ingredient before learning can take place; for a child is bound to pay attention as a lesson goes on if such a child is interested in the particular subject. Harbor-Peters (2002) also defined interest as:

subjective feeling of intentness or curiosity over something. The interest in a particular thing is a feeling manifested in an activity. Interest is a tendency to become absorbed in an experience and to continue in it. It is the zeal or willingness to participate in an activity from which one derives some pleasure (p. 34).

 

However, studies carried out in Nigeria have revealed high failure rate and relatively small proportion of students’ interest in subjects that require reading for comprehension (Ezugwu & Agwagah 2009). Students could be more comfortable when they interact with peers than when they are threatened by the presence of a teacher or an adult. Working alone with peers may generate interest among students, therefore, it is important to determine the extent semantic memory cues and language experience approaches can affect students’ interest in reading for comprehension since it is learner centered.

 

Research studies have indicated that self-efficacy is an important factor in school achievement (Friedman, 2009). Self-efficacy is defined as people’s beliefs about their capabilities to produce designated levels of achievement that exercise influence over events that affect their lives (Bandura, 2007). Self-efficacy can operationally be looked at as people’s beliefs in their capabilities to exercise control over their own functioning and over events that affect their lives. Beliefs in personal efficacy affect life choices, level of motivation, quality of functioning, resilience to adversity and vulnerability to stress and depression. Self-efficacy beliefs determine how people feel, think, motivate themselves and behave. Schunk and Zimmerman (2009) maintained that compared with pupils who doubt their learning capabilities, those who have a sense of efficacy for particular tasks participate more readily, work harder, persist longer when they encounter difficulties, and achieve at a higher level. It is therefore important to determine the extent semantic memory cues and language experience approaches can enhance the self-efficacy beliefs and sustain the interest of primary school pupils and success in school academic activities. According to Bandura (2012), if pupils have experienced success in a domain, they are likely to have higher self-efficacy in that domain.

 

Another area that has been of interest to researchers is the issue of gender on reading achievement of pupils. According to Ezeh (2013), gender refers to one’s subjective feeling of ‘maleness’ and ‘femaleness irrespective of one’s sex. While some research studies showed evidence of girls’ superiority over boys in reading (Umoh, 2009; Coley 2009&Newkirt cited in Onuigbo, 2009), some studies reported that boys achieved better (Okudo, 2013). Following these inconsistencies, this work seeks to contribute in resolving this controversy on gender as it affects reading achievement, interest and self-efficacy in reading comprehension. These were the driving forces that motivated this study.


1.2       STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Reading comprehension has been indicated to be very relevant in the life of any pupil. It is important in academic achievement as it helps pupils to construct meaning from texts as well as to examine and extend the meaning of the text. Yet the prevailing problem in Imo State, Nigeria is that the achievement of pupils in the transition into junior secondary school examinations has been declining steadily. Teachers, parents, curriculum experts and evaluators are worried, especially when the poor achievement has been blamed on poor reading comprehension achievement. The situation becomes more worrisome when one considers that the poor reading comprehension has been blamed on poor teaching methods. A lot of strategies have been recommended to improve the situation but the problems of poor academic achievement are still prevalent. It is believed that if the reading comprehension achievement of pupils in the transition to junior secondary schools remains like this, it may affect both the economic and technological growth of Nigeria. Research reports emanating from Western countries tend to suggest that semantic memory cues and language experience approaches have the potential for improving the achievement, interest and self-efficacy in reading comprehension of pupils. Yet, the effect of semantic memory cues and language experience approach would have on the reading comprehension achievement, interest and self-efficacy of Nigerian primary school pupils, who operate in a different socio-cultural environment, is yet to be determined. The problem of this study therefore put in a question form is: what would be the effect of semantic memory cues and language experience approaches on the achievement, interest and self-efficacy belief in reading comprehension of primary five school pupils? What is the influence of gender on the achievement, interest and self-efficacy belief in reading comprehension of primary five school pupils based on exposure to semantic memory cues and language experience approaches?


1.3       PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of semantic memory cues and language experience approach on achievement, interest and self-efficacy belief in reading comprehension of primary school pupils in Imo State. Specifically, the study sought to:

1)                  Find out the effect of semantic memory cues instructional approach on the mean reading comprehension achievement scores of pupils;

2)                  determine the effect of language experience instructional approach on the mean reading comprehension achievement scores of pupils;

3)                  ascertain the effect of semantic memory cues instructional approach on mean interest scores in reading comprehension of pupils;

4)                  determine the effect of language experience instructional approach on mean interest scores in reading comprehension of pupils;

5)                  find out the effect of semantic memory cue instructional approach on mean self-efficacy scores in reading comprehension of pupils;

6)                  examine the effect of language experience instructional approach on mean self-efficacy scores  in reading comprehension of pupils;

7)                  determine the influence of gender in mean reading comprehension achievement scores of pupils based on exposure to semantic memory cues instructional approach;

8)                  find out the influence of gender on mean reading comprehension achievement scores of pupils based on exposure to language experience instructional approach;

9)                  find out the influence of gender on mean interest in reading comprehension scores of pupils based on exposure to semantic memory cues instructional approach;

10)              determine the influence of gender on mean interest scores in reading comprehension of pupils based on exposure to language experience approach;

11)              find out the influence of gender on mean self-efficacy scores in reading comprehension of pupils based on exposure to semantic memory cues instructional approach;

12)              determine the influence of gender on mean self-efficacy scores in reading comprehension of pupils based on exposure to language experience instructional approach.


1.4       SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

The significance of the study derives both from the theoretical and empirical basis of the findings of the study. This study has some theoretical significance for Atkinson and Shiffrim’s (1968) multi store theory of memory which states that the short term memory acts as a gateway between sensory memory and long term memory. Multi memory theorist assumed that the main way in which information is transferred to the long term memory is through rehearsal in the short term memory. The finding of the study would also support Social Cognitive Theory (Self-efficacy) by Bandura (1977) which emphasized on imitation in language learning. Social learning theory shows that it is possible that young children learn language by imitating the speech of their parents, teachers, siblings, peers, school administrators, among others.

 

 

The study is relevant to pupils, teachers, government, corporate bodies, guidance counsellors, authors, curriculum planners and researchers when published. To the pupils, the study could reveal whether the strategies employed in semantic memory cues and language experience approaches can improve the reading comprehension achievement of pupils. The pupils who receive instruction using semantic memory cues and language experience approaches may become better learners. These semantic memory cues and language experience approaches could help them to integrate and construct meaning from the texts as well as examine and extend the meaning of the texts, as they bring the already existing schema to bear on what they read. The relationship between the pupils’ use of semantic memory cues and language experience approaches and their improved achievement in reading comprehension, would be motivated to learn. Their awareness of these processes they use in learning would facilitate their transfer of these strategies across various tasks and settings. They would realize that their inability to read and comprehend large volume of materials is as a result of ineffective learning strategies. This would encourage them to cultivate high sense of self-efficacy in order to sustain their interest in challenging and difficult life realities.

 

The teachers’ knowledge of these semantic memory cues and language experience approaches, which pupils utilize for better comprehension, may help them to consider giving pupils lessons on semantic memory cues and language experience approaches that aid reading comprehension at the beginning of the session. This orientation programme would provide pupils with an array of learning skills that they could explore to become independent and confident learners.

 

School Administrators may gain deeper insights into their role as instructional leaders and supervisors of the teaching learning process by recommending the use of these approaches in other subjects. The finding will benefit the school administrator who will now plan or re-design the programme in such a way that, pupils acquire reading comprehension skills which hitherto will enable them acquire logical reasoning. It will be beneficial to both the teachers and learners. The teacher will use the data in the classroom to improve the methodology in teaching-reading comprehension skills. For instance, the Federal and State Governments, Institutions of Higher Learning, Ministries of Education, could use the findings of this study, and be motivated to organize conferences, seminars and workshops for teachers on the semantic memory cues and language experience approaches that could be useful for pupils. These workshops and seminars could be designed to provide in-service training for teachers on how to design and undertake semantic memory cues and language experience approaches.

 

The findings of this study may benefit the corporate bodies like United Nations International Children’s Fund (UNICEF), United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), National Education Research Development Centre (NERDC) and reading Association of Nigeria who are interested in child development and education. It could be possible for such bodies to embark on seminars and workshops in the schools using the results of the study.

 

The findings of this study will benefit guidance counsellors. It may provide in-depth knowledge to guidance counsellors on how to counsel pupils with difficulty in reading comprehension. The study may be of importance to textbook authors and curriculum planners. The impact of these semantic memory cues and language experience approaches on the reading comprehension achievement of pupils may be so important that textbook writers may include sufficient information on the strategies in the pupils’ texts. Any textbook with sufficient guide on the use of these strategies would be popular among pupils and their teachers whose tasks would have reduced.

 

 Future researchers may benefit from this endeavour in such a way that the result may be used as a guide in conducting similar studies and development of methods to increase the use of semantic memory cues and language experience approaches.


1.5       RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The following research questions were posed and answered to guide the study:

1.      What is the effect of semantic memory cues instructional approach on the mean reading comprehension achievement scores of pupils?

2.      What is the effect of language experience instructional approach on the mean reading of comprehension achievement scores of pupils?

3.      To what extent does semantic memory cue instructional approach affect the mean interest scores in reading comprehension of pupils?

4.      To what extent does language experience instructional approach affect the mean scores interest in reading comprehension of pupils?

5.      What is the effect of semantic memory cue instructional approach on mean self-efficacy scores in reading comprehension of pupils?

6.      What is the effect of language experience approach on mean self-efficacy scores in reading comprehension of pupils?

7.      What influence does gender have in mean reading comprehension achievement scores of pupils based on exposure to semantic memory cues instructional approach?

8.      What influence does gender have on the mean reading comprehension achievement scores of pupils based on exposure to language experience instructional approach?

9.      To what extent does gender influence the mean interest scores in reading comprehension of pupils based on exposure to semantic memory cues instructional approach?

10.  To what extent does gender influence the mean interest scores in reading comprehension of pupils based on exposure to language experience instructional approach?

11.  What is the influence of gender on mean self-efficacy scores in reading comprehension of pupils based on exposure to semantic memory cues instructional approach?

12.  What is the influence of gender on mean self-efficacy scores in reading comprehension of pupils based on exposure to language experience instructional approach?

 

1.6       HYPOTHESES

The following null hypotheses were formulated and tested at the 0.05 level of significance.

        i.            H01: There is no significant difference in the mean reading comprehension achievement scores of pupils who were exposed to semantic memory cues instructional approach and those taught using conventional teaching method.

      ii.            H02: There is no significant difference in the mean reading comprehension achievement scores of pupils who were exposed to language experience instructional approach and those taught using             conventional    teaching method.

    iii.            H03: There is no significant difference in the mean reading comprehension interest scores of pupils   who were exposed to semantic memory cues instructional approach and those taught using conventional teaching method.

    iv.            H04: There is no significant difference in the mean reading comprehension interest scores of pupils who were exposed to language experience approach instructional approach and those taught using conventional teaching method.

      v.            H05: There is no significant difference in the mean reading comprehension self-efficacy scores of pupils who were exposed to semantic memory cues instructional approach and those taught using conventional    teaching method.

 vi.            H06: There is no significant difference in the mean reading comprehension self-efficacy scores of pupils who were exposed to language experience instructional approach and those taught using conventional    teaching method.

  vii.            H07: Gender has no significant influence on the mean reading comprehension achievement scores of pupils exposed to semantic memory cues instructional approach.

viii.            H08: Gender has no significant influence on the mean reading comprehension achievement scores of pupils exposed to language experience instructional approach.

 ix.            H09: Gender has no significant influence on the mean reading comprehension interest scores of pupils exposed to semantic memory cues instructional approach.

 x.            H010: Gender has no significant influence on the mean reading comprehension interest scores of pupils exposed to language experience instructional approach.

 xi.            H011: There is no significant influence of gender on the mean reading comprehension self- efficacy scores of pupils who were exposed to semantic memory cues instructional approach.

  xii.            H012: There is no significant influence of gender on the mean reading comprehension self- efficacy scores of pupils who were exposed to language experience instructional approach.


1.7       SCOPE OF THE STUDY

The study was delimited to 2017/2018 primary five pupils in Imo State. The study focused on determining the effect of semantic memory cues and language experience approaches on achievement, interest and self-efficacy belief in reading comprehension of primary five pupils in Imo State. The independent variables in this study include semantic memory cues and language experience approaches, while the dependent variables are achievement, interest and self-efficacy in reading comprehension with gender as moderator variable. Comprehension tests were drawn from passages in English comprehension tests for senior primary schools (primary five pupils) because these are the areas that had been identified as presenting difficulty to the pupils.

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment