ABSTRACT
It
is crucial to determine the prevalence and outcomes of AEFIs outside Kano
metropoly where there are high misperceptions about immunization, as these AEFI
can result in low vaccination rates. When having discussions with general
public regarding childhood immunization the common response is "it's
harmful", people have fear immunization can cause unwanted effect on their
child's body. It's therefore important to assess the prevalence and outcomes of
AEFI outside Kano city to have an idea about the magnitude of the problem and
use that data to guide public enlightenment campaigns on childhood routine
immunization. This study was carried
out to determine the prevalence, pattern and outcomes of adverse event
following immunization among children less than 24months attending immunization
clinic in Kachako primary health centre, Kachako, Takai Local Government of
Kano state. The study was targeted at mothers/caregivers/child pairs attending
immunization clinic in Kachako PHC. A descriptive cross-sectional study was
conducted in May, 2025 using a simple random sampling technique by balloting to
select 200 respondents in immunization clinic in Kachako PHC. Data was
collected using adapted pretested self-administered structured questionnaire.
The data collected were analysed using SPSS V25. The results were presented in
frequency tables, and figures. Chi-square test was used to assess the
associations between some of the variables. The level of significance was set
at <0.05. The mean age of the respondents was found to be 26.68. Their age
was ranged from 18-44years. The Majority (n=116, 58%) of them were within the
age group 25-29 years. The Median age of the index children was 7.89. More than
half of the index children (n=107, 53.5 %) were within the age group of 1-6
months. The prevalence of AEFI found by this study was 55.5% of the index
children. Fever is the most frequently occurring AEFI in (n=104, 52%) of the
children. Penta valent vaccine was the most associated antigen by the
respondents. About half of the respondents also reported AEFI in other
children of theirs. Close to 90% of the AEFI was unserious, managed at home
mostly with paracetamol, with fever the commonest followed by pain and swelling
at injection site. Although the prevalence was high full recovery was in almost
90% of the cases.
PHC
: Primary Health Centre
L.G : Local Government
AEFI
: Acute events following immunization
KAP
: Knowledge Attitude and Practice
EPI
: Expanded Programme on immunization
USA
: United State of America
BCG
: Bacilli Calmette Guerin
Hep
B : Hepatitis B
Hib : Hemophillus influenza type b
OPV
: Oral Polio Vaccine
TT
: Tetanus Toxoid
NPI
: National Programme on Immunization
DPT:
Diphtheria Pertussis and Tetanus
PCV
: Pneumococcal Vaccine
UNICEF
: United Nation Children Emergency Fund
WHO
: World Health Organisation
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DECLARATION.. iii
CERTIFICATION.. iv
DEDICATION.. v
ABSTRACT.. vii
TABLE OF
CONTENTS……………………………………………………………..…..ix
LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………..xi
LIST OF
FIGURE……………………………………………………………………….xii
ABBREVIATIONS. viii
CHAPTER ONE.. 1
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY.. 1
1.2 PROBLEMS STATEMENT.. 6
1.3 JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY.. 7
1.4 AIM AND OBJECTIVES. 8
CHAPTER TWO.. 9
LITERATURE REVIEW... 9
2.1 INTRODUCTION.. 9
2.2 CLASSIFICATION
OF ADVERSE EVENT FOLLOWING IMMUNIZATION.. 9
2.3
PREVALENCE OF ADVERSE EVENT FOLLOWING IMMUNIZATION.. 11
2.6
FACTORS INFLUENCING ADVERSE EVENT FOLLOWING IMMUNIZATION 28
CHAPTER THREE.. 30
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY.. 30
3.1 STUDY AREA.. 30
3.2 STUDY DESIGN.. 31
3.3 STUDY POPULATION.. 31
3.4 INCLUSION CRITERIA.. 31
3.5 EXCLUSION CRITERIA.. 31
3.6 SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION.. 31
3.7 SAMPLING TECHNIQUE.. 33
3.8.0 INSTRUMENT AND METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION.. 33
3.8.1 Study instrument: 33
3.8.2 Pretesting. 33
3.8.3 Recruitment and training of interviewers: 33
3.90 DATA COLLECTION.. 34
3.10 DATA ANALYSIS. 34
3.11 ETHICAL CONSIDERATION.. 34
CHAPTER FOUR.. 35
4.0. RESULTS. 35
4.1. INTRODUCTION.. 35
4.2. SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RESPONDENTS
4.3. PREVALENCE OF ADVERSE
EVENT FOLLOWING IMMUNIZATION
4.4 PATTERN OF ADVERSE EVENTS FOLLOWING IMMUNIZATION.. 39
4.5. ACTION TAKEN BY THE CAREGIVERS TOWARDS AEFI. 43
CHAPTER FIVE.. 46
5.1 DISCUSSION.. 46
5.2. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION.. 51
5.3. IMPLICATIONS. 52
5.4. LIMITATIONS. 53
5.5. RECOMMENDATIONS. 54
REFERRENCES. 56
APPENDIX.. 68
LIST
OF TABLES
Table 1: Characteristics Of Children Under Five Years…………………………………..35
Table 2: Socio-Demorgraphic Characteristics Of The Parents Of
Children Less Than 5 Years………………………………………………………………………………………….36
Table 3: Pattern Of Aefi…………….……………………………………………………….39
Table 4: Immunization Visit When Aefi Occurs…………………….……….……………...40
Table 5: Number Of Vaccines Received……………….…………………….…………....41
Table 6: Respondents’ Perception Of Antigen Associated With
The Aefi……….…….…...42
Table 7: Response To Aefi In Index Children……………………………..………..……..43
Table
8: Relationship Between Maternal Level Of
Education And Immunization Visits…..44
Table 9: Relationship
Between Child’s Age, Sex And Aefi Occurrence……………………44
LIST OF FIGURE
Figure 1: Prevalence of AEFI………………………………………………………..………38
Figure 2: Severity of AEFI…………………………..………………………………………39
Figure 3: Time taken for the onset of AEFI. ………………………………………………..40
Figure 4: Distribution of appropriate immunization given for
their age…………………….41
Figure 5: Occurrence
Of Aefi In The Other Children Of The Caregivers Attending Immunization In Kachako Phc…………………………………………….……………….42
Figure 6: Recovery From Aefi………………………………………………………….…...43
Immunization entails making an individual resistant to
disease. The process by which an individual is
made immune or resistant to an infectious disease, typically by the
administration of a vaccine (UNICEF). Immunization remains of the most
important public health interventions and a cost-effective strategy to reduce
both the morbidity and mortality associated vaccine-preventable diseases (Tagbo Omotowo,Nwokoye,2012). VPDs are a major
source of mortality and morbidity among children throughout the developing
world, causing deaths in millions every year (UNICEF).
To prevent these diseases, vaccines are delivered
through routine health services and through supplemental immunization
activities to the children targeted (Mallika,2014).Immunization is essential in
achieving targets 3.3 and 3.8 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) which
hope to end epidemics of communicable diseases and achieve universal health
coverage by 2030, respectively (WHO 2017). Globally, it is estimated that
immunization averts an estimated two to three million deaths from diphtheria,
tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough) and measles every year in all age groups
(Araki and Bruno, 2006.). Despite the numerous benefits of immunization, uptake
of vaccines is still very low especially in developing countries Nigeria
inclusive, making VPDs the most common cause of childhood mortality with an
estimated 2-3million deaths each year (GAVI 2016).In the United States of
America (USA), the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)
recommends routine vaccination against 14 diseases during the first 24 months
of life (Wodi,Ault,Hunter,McNally,Szilagyi,2021).
In the USA, report showed that coverage among
children born during 2016–2017 compared with coverage among children born
during 2018–2019 increased for a majority of recommended vaccines (Holly,Michael,Laurie,Elam-Evans,Yankey,2019).Coverage
was >90% for ≥ 3 doses of poliovirus vaccine (93.4%), ≥ 3 doses of hepatitis
B vaccine (HepB) (92.7%), ≥1 dose of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR)
(91.6%), and ≥1 dose of varicella vaccine (VAR) (91.1%); coverage was lowest
for =2 doses of hepatitis A vaccine (HepA) (47.3%) (Holly et al,2019).
Adverse event following immunization (AEFI) has been
defined as any untoward medical occurrence which follows immunization, and
which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the usage of the
vaccine (WHO). Vaccine-associated adverse events may affect healthy individuals
and should be promptly identified to allow additional research and appropriate
action to take place. If not rapidly and effectively dealt with, these events
undermines people’s confidence in a vaccine and can ultimately lead to dramatic
consequences for immunization coverage and disease incidence (WHO). These
adverse events are global phenomena (Tagbo et
al.,2012, Jolly et al,2019). For
example, in the USA, it was reported that for every 10,000 cases of
vaccinations, 1.14 cases of AEFIs were reported with 1.4% deaths (Puliyel,
2013).In Australia, 14.1 cases of AEFIs were reported per 100,000 doses in 2009
(Hu,Li,Lin,Chen,Chen,2013) and in 2012,
129.5 per 100,000 vaccine doses in Sri Lanka (MOH Sri Lanka,2013). A descriptive study done in Brazil reported that BCG
vaccine was responsible for 41.3% of all cases of cold subcutaneous abscess,
lymphadenitis and ulcers bigger than 1cm (Bisseto 2017). A study conducted in China revealed that majority of the AEFI occurred more than 24 hours after
vaccination (Hiu 2012). A study done in Iran revealed that most AEFI were more
frequently observed after the first dose than the second dose of vaccination
with the pentavalent vaccine (Karimi et al ,2017) Which might be because the immune system is already sensitized
after the first dose leading to better tolerance upon administration of the
second dose (Adam,Onowugbeda,Osuji,Omohwovo,2020.).
Similarly, a
study in India revealed that the overall incidence of any AEFI reported
(including any major, minor or coincidental events) with the first dose
vaccination, was 136/1000 vaccination events, with most people experiencing any
AEFI after 30 min but within 24 h following immunization (Chaudhary et al,2022.). The spectrum of symptoms
reported within 30 min of vaccination ranged from local events (redness and
itching) to systemic or generalized symptoms such as Ghabrahat or tachycardia
were most common. A total of 75 AEFIs were reported within 24 h with the most
common complaint being onset of fever within 24 hrs among any AEFI reported. The occurrence of AEFI within
7 days of vaccination was reported to be 15, where the most frequent symptom
was fever of all AEFI reported (Chaudhary et
al, 2022.).
Another similar study in Hamadan, Iran
revealed that the cumulative incidence rate of pentavalent-related adverse
events during 48 hours following immunization was estimated to be 15.8% for
swelling, 10.9% for redness, 44.2% for pain, 12.6% for mild fever, 0.1% for
high fever, 20.0% for drowsiness, 15.0% for loss of appetite, 32.9% for
irritability, 4.6% for vomiting and 5.5% for persistent crying, however, there
was no evidence for the occurrence of convulsion and encephalopathy among
children who receive pentavalent vaccines (Karamin et al, 2017).
In Africa context, for example, in
Malawi and other countries in East Africa and southern Africa, MDR H58 S. Typhi
(Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine) which emerged in 2010 after its introduction from
Asia (Feasey et al,2015,Wong et al,2015) specifically became the
predominant bloodstream infection among adults and children in Malawi, with a
21% incidence of complications among children (including a 3.6% incidence of
small-bowel perforation) and a 2.1% case fatality rate (Musicha 2017; Olgemoeller 2020).
Another study in Malawi revealed a primary outcome following Typhoid conjugate
vaccine was blood culture confirmed typhoid fever which occurred any time after
vaccination.13 Secondary
outcomes were the safety profiles of Vi-TCV and the MenA vaccine (assessed
according to the number of adverse events detected in the first 30 minutes
after vaccination), the number of serious adverse events within 28 days after
vaccination, and the number of adverse events within 6 months after
vaccination. For the primary evaluation of vaccine efficacy, all children were
under enhanced passive surveillance for at least 18 months from February 21,
2018, to April 3, 2020 (Patel et al, 2021).
Despite a 2008 WHO recommendation for
programmatic use of existing vaccines in countries in which typhoid is endemic
(WHO 2008), no African country integrated these vaccines into routine
schedules, largely because of the unsuitability of their use in the youngest
children and the need for repeated doses (Patel et al, 2021).
A study conducted in Enugu among 331
mothers revealed that 190 (57.4%) of children less than 24 months with AEFI
were managed by giving paracetamol, 43 (19.5%) took their children to the
hospital, while 2 (0.9%) used herbal mixtures (Osa-eloka, Ekwueme, 2009).
Another study at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital (UBTH), Benin State
reported that fever was the commonest AEFI reported by majority, 142 (84.0%) of
the caregivers, followed by swelling and pain at the injection site (Adam et al,2020).
Majority of the caregivers claimed that the AEFI
occurred 24 hours or more after the vaccine
was administered 106 (62.7%) and especially after the first dose of vaccine was
given 107 (63.3%).
Three-quarters of the caregivers, 126
(74.6%) reported a previous AEFI episode following BCG vaccination, while 68
(40.2%), 48 (28.4%) and 40 (23.7%) stated that the AEFI occurred following
pentavalent, measles and yellow fever vaccine respectively. A study done in
Ilorin, North-central, Nigeria revealed about 49.1% of the reported AEFI cases
occurred after administering Diphtheria, Pertussis and Tetanus (DPT) has the
most commonly reported cause of AEFI (Aderibigbe,et al.,2010).
A study done on AEFI in Kaduna State,
revealed Zaria local government area (LGA) had the highest reporting rates of
AEFI in the Kaduna State while Sanga LGA has the lowest reporting rate per
10,000 doses of vaccines administered (Ishaku, et al., 2021). Although, Kaduna state have an overall of AEFI
reporting rate of 9.09 per 10,000 administered doses. This Kaduna study further
revealed that Pentavalent vaccine is the suspect antigen responsible for the
highest number of AEFI cases and accounted for 90.91% of reported cases and a
vaccine reaction rate of 44.77 per 10000 doses while the suspect antigen for
the lowest number of attributable AEFI cases is Td with only 17
cases being reported for the period representing
0.22% and a vaccine reaction rate of 0.18 per 10000 doses (Ishaku,et al.,2017).
The distribution of the cases by gender
showed that 49.9% (3904) were males, while 50.1% (3920) were females (Ishaku,et al.,2017).
Twenty-one (21) of the 28 reaction types in the line-
list with fever(<38℃) the main reaction types reported while no single case
of anaphylaxis, anaphylactic shock, facial paralysis, neck stiffness,
encephalopathy, sepsis, or unconsciousness were reported (Ishaku,et al.,2017).
In a study conducted in selected PHCs within Kano metropoly on AEFI
among children less than 24 months the prevalence of AEFI was (43.5%, n=164),
and most cases (72.4%, n=273) were mild. Fever was the most common type of AEFI
reported (66.5%, n=109) and was higher among infants less than three months
(44.5%, n=73). Age of the index child was the only significant predictor of
AEFI (OR:0.18, 95% CI: 0.10-0.35). The study shows that AEFI was common among
children less than 24 months old in Kano (Maizare, et al., 2021).
1.2 PROBLEMS STATEMENT
AEFIs
underreporting is one of the barriers to achieving the objectives of
pharmaco-vigilance of vaccines worldwide (WHO 2016; Tsafaka, 2015). Nigeria
mainly practices a mix of passive and active AEFI surveillance, which involves
spontaneous reporting by health workers (HWs) and the general public report any
condition that they believe could be associated or related to a
vaccine/vaccination (FMOH Nigeria,2020). Some reports in Nigeria revealed a
high prevalence (34.9%) of AEFI and 22.1% for pentavalent vaccine in the
country (Kaduna State PHCDB, 2018; Lawan, et
al., 2016).In Africa, poliomyelitis vaccine was suspended in Nigeria for
one year following quality and safety issues alleged by religious leaders
(Muhammad, et al., 2018) This led to
massive rebound of polio cases (Clement,et
al.,2006). Similarly, a review of Nigerian AEFI national report for 2018
showed Kaduna State as one of the States with sub-optimal reporting of AEFI
cases in the country (Ishaku, et al., 2021;
Sadon,et al.,2018). The WHO in 1999,
developed generic guidelines for AEFI surveillance that can be adapted to local
resources and systems (Pan American Health
Organization,2002); In tackling the problems in the past, Nigeria have
instituted AEFI surveillance into its Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI),
in line with WHO AEFI guidelines, and its AEFI guidelines produced in 2011 were
revised in 2018 to meet current challenges (FMOH, 2020). Modules on AEFI have
previously been part of the Basic Guide for Routine Immunization training conducted
for health workers across the country in 2017
Kaduna State, in North-western Nigeria, has, in this regard, trained
2405 personnel from 1184 public and private health facilities in all its 23
Local Government areas (Kaduna State PHCDB, 2018).
In Nigeria, studies have shown that immunization
coverage was on the decline. Reasons include failure to assess immunization
status of children during visit to health facilities, failure to administer all
the needed vaccines simultaneously (Tagbo,2005) and probably fears of adverse
events, as is seen in developed countries today (Sadoh, et al.,2007). Poor AEFI surveillance impacts negatively on
immunization (Bardenheir,2004).To reduce
the occurrence of vaccine adverse events and maintain public confidence in
vaccines, further research is important to improve understanding of vaccine
safety and thereby foster the development and use of safer vaccines (Muhammad et al.,2018).
1.3 JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY
The importance of AEFI in Nigeria cannot be
underscored in helping to link the causality association between the vaccine
administered and the reported event for action (FMOH, 2020). According to the
International Vaccine Access Center (IVAC) projections, achieving immunization
coverage of 90% in Nigeria in the next decade will increase the country’s
economy by $17 billion. Several reports and local community surveys have
indicated that AEFI is one of the primary reasons for inadequate immunization
coverage in Kaduna State (KSPHCDB 2016; National
Bureau of Statistics,2016/2017) coupled with the fact that in recent times,
Nigeria had introduced new vaccines into the immunization schedules. More are
expected in the coming years, thereby making it essential to strengthen AEFI
surveillance in the country through timely detection, analysis, and adequate
responses to AEFI cases (FMOH,2020).
The rationale for carrying out this present study
among caregivers of children less than 24 months is because research has shown
that most caregivers are ignorant about AEFI and sometimes failed to report
these adverse events following immunization (Rania et al.,2017). Again, a study revealed that AEFI affects
immunization uptake among children less than 24 months in ABUTH, Zaria (Ishaku et al,2021). To my best knowledge
although a study was conducted on prevalence and outcome of AEFI among children
less than 24 months attending selected PHCs within Kano metropoly, no similar
research was conducted on similar topic in a PHC outside Kano metropoly . To
add to the existing body of knowledge of this topic, it is important to find
out the prevailing pattern of occurrence of AEFI among children under 24 months
attending immunization clinic of Kachako PHC. In order to influence
evidence-based policy decision-making and planning for immunization services in
Kachako Ward, Takai LG and Kano state at large. Also, this present study would
help to fill the knowledge gaps of the caregivers about AEFI and make them more
aware of AEFI.
1.4 AIM
AND OBJECTIVES
1.4.1 GENERAL
OBJECTIVES
To determine the prevalence, pattern and outcomes of
adverse event following immunization among children less than 24months
attending immunization clinic in Kachako PHC, Kachako, Takai LG, Kano State.
1.4.2 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
1. To determine the prevalence of adverse
event following immunization among children less than 24months attending
immunization clinic in Kachako PHC.
2. To determine the patterns and trends of
adverse event following immunization among children less than 24months
attending immunization clinic in Kachako PHC
3. To determine the outcomes of adverse
event following immunization among of children less than 24months attending
immunization clinic in Kachako PHC.
4. To assess the factors
influencing adverse event following immunization among children less than 24
months in Kachako PHC.
Login To Comment