ABSTRACT
The
study attempted to investigate the planning of educational resources for school
effectiveness in selected secondary schools in Mainland Local Government Area
of Lagos State. The study equally reviewed some important and extensive
literatures under sub-headings. The descriptive research survey design was
applied in the assessment of respondents’ opinions towards the subject matter.
In this study, four null hypotheses were formulated and tested with the
application of t-test and the Pearson Product Moment Correlational Coefficient
Statistical tools at 0.05 significance level. Also, the simple percentage
frequency counts was used to analyse the questionnaire response of the selected
respondents together with the research questions. A total of 200 (two hundred)
respondents, 50 (fifty) teachers and 150 (one hundred and fifty) students were
selected for this study. At the end of the data analyses, the following results
were obtained thus: Hypothesis one found that planning of educational resources
will significantly influence its utilization, hypothesis two revealed that
there is a significant relationship between planning and management of
educational resources, hypothesis three revealed that there is a significant
difference between the job performance of teachers who teach in schools where
educational resources are planned and those who teach where they are not, and
hypothesis four showed that a significant difference exists between the
academic performance of students who are in schools where educational resources
are planned and those in schools where they are not planned.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page i
Certification ii
Dedication iii
Acknowledgements iv
Abstract v
Table of Contents vi
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1
Background to the Study 1
Statement of the Problem 10
Purpose of the Study 10
Research Questions 11
Research Hypotheses 11
Significance of the Study 12
Scope of the Study 14
Definition of Terms 14
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE
REVIEW 16
Concept of Planning 16
Concept and Essence of Educational Resources
Planning 18
Planning and Utilization of Educational
Resources 26
Relationship between Planning and Management
of Educational Resources45
Planning and Management of Educational
Resources and Teacher’s Work Performance 49
Planning of Educational Resources and
Students’ Academic Performance 52
Summary of Review 56
CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY 57
Introduction 57
Research Design 57
Population of the Study 58
Sample and Sampling Technique 58
Research Instrument 59
Validity of Instrument 59
Reliability of Instrument 59
Procedure for Data Collection 60
Data Analysis Method 60
CHAPTER FOUR: DATA
ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS 61
Introduction 61
Descriptive Analyses of Teachers’ Responses
Together with the Research Questions 61
Hypotheses Testing 71
Summary of Findings 75
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY,
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 76
Introduction 76
Summary of the Study 76
Discussion of the Findings 78
Conclusions 80
Recommendations 81
References 83
Appendix 88
CHAPTER
ONE
INTRODUCTION
Background to the Study
The
term planning has no doubt enjoyed wide application across disciplines.
However, different institutional context and socio-political structures
determine the specific activity that can be classified as involving planning.
For example, what an architect may regard as a planning activity may slightly
differ from that of a medical doctor, an engineer, an economist or an
administrator. In the same vein, the content of planning in the former
socialist USSR before the break up of the Republic or any socialist country
cannot be the same as that in the capitalize economy like the USA or any other
capital country (Adigwe, 2000).
However,
planning has been used to mean the process of determining in advance, what is
to be done, including classification of goals, establishment of policies,
mapping out of programmes and campaigns and determining specific methods or
procedures and fixing day to day schedules (Newman, 1993). In contemporary
usage, Newmans definition appears limited, since it did not recognize the focal
issue that has given rise to the adoption of planning in every field of
economic life. That focal issue is rationally or optimization of resource use.
Therefore,
the term, “planning” connote a process which essentially involves deciding in
advance, the specific future course of action to be adopted with a view of
optimizing the use of limited organization resources towards desirable and
specified goal attainment. What is clear from this is that planning is a
conscious, deliberate, systematic and rational decision making process,
designed to influence future course of action in an organization or any field
of human activity with the ultimate aim of making the most economical use of
the limited resources (i.e. profit or benefit maximization) (Ayo, 1989).
A
plan then is a product of the planning processes. It is a blueprint for action
towards organization goal attainment in the most effective and efficient
manner. The need to plan all human activities that involves the use of
resources to accomplish objectives have become very necessary for many reasons.
Firstly, the fact that economic resources like time, money, human and other
resources are limited relative to the competitive demand for them makes it
desirable that activities should be planned, to ensure economical use of these
resources. Secondly, planning gives purposeful direction to all actions of
organizations; since all actions generated from planning are usually
goal-directed. A well directed activity facilitates delegation of duties,
enhances control and forms a rational basis for evaluation. Finally, planning
enables us to pre-empt future consequences of organizational activities, which
is desirable to adjust actions towards desirable objectives, thereby avoiding wastages
of all types (Duro, 1980).
From
the above benefits, we can easily appreciate why everybody (educational
administrator or manager, teacher, student, house wife, market woman, farmer
etc) must involves in planning. The difference lies in the content and degree
of sophistication put inot it.
Educational
resources include the human, physical, material and financial resources in any
given school system. According to Anyanwu (1990), for the educational resources
to be managed and planned well, the school authorities should be on their toes
and ensure that they engage experienced and well groomed personnel to carry out
planning and managing of our educational resources in the school system of
Nigeria. For instance, managers and planners of the Nigerian educational system
should endeavour that teachers and other personnel in the educational sector
are well trained and retrained for them to carry out effective work of teaching
and learning in the school. According to Adigwe (2000), the financial
allocations to the school are not properly managed by the school managers, and
this has caused lack of proper funding of the schools for effectiveness and
high productivity in the system.
Onyenlor
(1994) argued that lack of material and physical resources like the building,
the school plants like the school environment and other resources like the
video tapes, audio video tapes and so on, are not adequately available in the
school, and the ones that are available are not well planned and effectively
managed by those who control and manage the school. Onyenlor summed it up by
saying that poor management of the educational resources such as human,
physical, materials, materials and financial resources have give rise to the
poor work performance of teachers and dismal academic performance of the
Nigerian students in our school system. He advised that, for our educational
system to be revived from the decay it has sunk into, the educational resources
must be well planned and managed effectively.
In
education, the importance of human resources planning and management cannot be
over emphasized. This is because, the role
played by human resources management and planning on the achievement of
education objectives cannot be neglected (Iyede, 1998). According to Odenu
(2000), human resources planning and management, involves planning, leading,
directing and a number of other activities in order to achieve the efficient
utilization of human resources. Precisely, it involves integrating society’s
needs with education objectives among other things.
In
addition, the extent to which an organization like education, attains her
objectives are directly proportional to the human resources available and their
planning and management. Human resources management is described by the
Institute of Personnel Management (1963) as “one of the most valuable resources
of an organization”.
In
another development, Anyanwuocha (2000) described human resources as the most
vital of the resources that are at disposal of the educational enterprise. The
proper management of the human resources in it, would be apart from an added
advantage in attaching educational goals, it also attracts efficient and
quality staff or workforce in the educational sector (Anyamole, 1990).
The
term, personnel administration refers to management of human resources, the
acquisition of personnel and co-ordination of performance within the
organization. Cubson (1985) opined that there is limited literature in the area
of human resources planning and management. Equally, he added that, since early
1970s, there has been an increased attention to administrative specialization
on education.
Peretomode
(1991) and Nwangwu (1994), state that human researches planning and management
are variously referred to as personnel management. They observed that human
resources management and planning are that functions of all enterprise which
provides for effective utilization of human resources in order to achieve both
objective of the, enterprise and the satisfaction and development of the
employees. According to them, without the planning and management of human
resources, staff in the educational sector would not be effectively harnessed
and managed for effective utilization in education, especially in the teaching
learning processes.
The
component part of management concerned with facilitating the accomplishment of
the objectives of an organization through the systematic management of
constraints and careful utilization of the available, limited resources which
include human, material, equipment supplies, finance and work techniques or
technology is known as administration (Peretomode, 1991). According to him,
while management deals with the formulation of policies, administration is
fundamentally concerned with the execution and implementation of the formulated
policies, plans or ideas and programmes. As Amaonye (2000) puts it,
administrators are more of implementers of policies and programmes rather than
formulators of programmes and administration like management, involves such
elements and reporting and evaluating, but this is done on a smaller scale when
it is done on a smaller scale when it is compared with management.
According
to Ezewu (1983) “the school management in the traditional sense is often
thought of as involving the management and planning human resources such as men
(teachers and students) and perhaps money (school finance). The buildings,
school space, and equipment are usually taken for granted as given, for they,
are there or “on the ground” as it were and therefore should not be given attention.
But this assumption is unwarranted for they are actually not there.
Onyeuke
(2000), observed that school facilities means substantial costs to the school
system for their establishment. According to him, if they are not properly
maintained and managed, they depreciate and become dilapidated and even wear
out faster than their normal “life span”, and also if not properly utilized,
the school units would not derive optimum benefits from their use.
Educational
resources or material resources; or educational facilities and or school plant
are the ‘things of education’. These according to Adeleke (1994), include,
school building (classrooms, assembly halls; laboratory rooms and workshops;
libraries etc.), teaching aids and devices such as modern educational hardware
and their software in the form of magnetic tapes, films and transparencies.
Educational facilities or resources are the material things that facilitate the
effective teaching and learning processes in the school.
As
observed by Mgbodule (1986), educational facilities are directly related with
the school curriculum. Mgbodile (1986), described the school plant as the space
interpretation of the school curriculum. According to him, the programmes of
the school are expressed as it were through the school site, the buildings,
play grounds the arrangement and design of the buildings etc.
According
to Amaobi (1990), the logical place to start planning the educational resources
or school facilities, is the development of the educational programme. The
school educational programme should strongly influence the design of the school
buildings. The basic principle here is that no educational facility should
impose unwanted restrictions upon the educational programmes of the school
buildings in Nigerian school system, especially the public school buildings set
up to by the communities in the 1980s, were just set up as buildings to house
students without regard to planning in terms of what educational purposes the
buildings should serve or their place in the delivery of the school programme
(Ayo, 1989).
School
plant or resources planning experts agree that curriculum development is a
crucial aspect of school resources planning. For instance, no architect can
design a functional educational need without a clear description of the
educational programmes in the school (Castaldi, 1977).
As
Onyeanwu (1990) puts it, it is advisable that considerable time should be devoted
in developing the curriculum of the school before actual planning or designing
of the school building by the architects begin. For instance, the architect
should not only know what subjects would be taught, but should know the
fundamental educational concepts and students’ experiences that underlie the
design of the buildings. The architects should know what equipment is needed
and how much space the teachers feel a student needs to perform each type of
educational experience.
According
to Iroegbu (1995), if the architect lacks the vital information about the
school before designing and constructing the school building, this often
results in the design and construction of who would use them or the community
in which school is located. So, educational resources need to be well planned
by experts if there should be effectiveness in the school, especially in the
effective teaching and learning processes in the school.
Statement of the Problem
School
productivity cannot be effective without adequate planning and management of
educational resources, which include financial, physical and human resources.
Often times, planners and managers of the educational resources for Nigerian
Secondary School system, are not experts and well groomed for planning and management
of our educational resources which should be effective and result-oriented.
For
the fact, those who plan our educational resources are not vast and
knowledgeable enough on how to carry out efficient educational resources
planning; the resultant effect has been ineffectiveness in school productivity.
For instance, for the reason of ineffective educational resources planning and
good management, there has been rote in teaching and learning processes, and
this has affected adversely, both the job performance of teachers and academic
performance of students, and generally, the educational standards of Nigeria as
a country.
Purpose of the Study
The objective
of this study includes to:
1. Ascertain whether planning influence
educational resources utilization in the school.
2. Examine whether there is relationship
between planning and management of educational resources.
3. Investigate whether relationship exists
between school productivity and educational resources’ planning.
4. Compare the academic performance of students
in schools where resource are planned and those in schools where they are not.
5. Examine whether the work performance of
teachers in well planned schools differ from performance of those in schools
where resources are not planned.
Research Questions
The
following research questions were raised in this study:
1. Does planning affect educational resources?
2. Does any difference exists between the
school productivity and educational resources planning?
3. Will there be any difference between the
academic performance of students who are in schools where educational resources
are planned and those in schools where they are not planned?
4. Will there be any difference in job
performance of teachers who work in schools where educational resources are
planned and those in schools where they are not?
Research Hypotheses
The
following research hypotheses are formulated to guide the study:
1. Planning of educational resources will not
significant influence its utilization.
2. There will be no significant relationship
between planning and management of educational resources.
3. There will be no significant difference
between the job performance of teachers who are in schools where resources are
planned and those in schools where they are not.
4. There will be no significant difference
between the academic performance of students in schools where educational
resources are planned and those in schools where they are not.
Significance of the Study
The
study will be beneficial to all stakeholders in the Nigerian school system. For
example:
The
school authorities at both our primary and secondary school levels would be
able to benefit from the recommendations and the findings obtained from this
study. For instance, the school authorities and the stakeholders in our
educational sector, especially at the secondary school level, would find this
study very important in the sense that, it will generate new or fresh insight
and information on the way forward to planning and management of educational
resources in our various schools.
Not
only the school authorities, the teacher who is one of the most important and
prominent stakeholders in Nigeria’s educational system, would be able to have
good information on planning and management of educational resources for
effective teaching and learning processes in the school.
With
the findings and recommendations in this study, administrators of our
educational system, including educational planners, would be able to see the
need to plan well the educational resources, because, guiding their usefulness,
if the educational resources are not properly planned and adequately executed
by the school administrators, it results to unproductively in school. This
study will be very informative and directional to the school managers/administrators
and planners. This is because, it will make them to have insights on how best
to plan educational resources and how well to manage them effectively. This
work, if completed, will serve as reference material to researchers and
students. Also, this study will be relevant to other agencies of our
educational system, because this study will help them to understand the move,
the positive functions of well planned and properly executed school/educational
resources and the attendant results.
Scope of the Study
This
study examines the planning of educational resources for school effectiveness
in selected secondary schools in Mainland Local Government Area of Lagos State.
Definition of Terms
In
this study, operational and ambiguous terms were categorically defined thus:
Planning: Plan
has been used to mean the process of determining in advance, what is to be
done, including classification of goals, establishment of policies, mapping out
of programmes and campaigns and determining specific methods or procedures and
fixing day to day schedules.
Physical Resources:
Education resources or educational facilities are regarded as things of the
school or education, which include the building (classrooms, assembly halls,
laboratories, workshops, libraries, etc.) they also include the teaching aids
and devices, which include modern educational hardwares and their softwares
which are utilized in the effective teaching and learning processes in the
school system.
Administration: This
fundamentally concerned with the execution and implementation of the formulated
policies, plans or ideas and programmes of education.
Management: This
concerned with the facilitation or the accomplishment of the objectives of an
organization through the systematic management of constraints and careful
utilization of the available, limited resources which include human, material,
equipment supplies, finance and work techniques or technology.
School Programmes: This
means the activities, events or programmes that take place in the school
environment such as orientation programmes, workshops, seminars or in-house
programmes of the school.
School Plant: This
refers to educational resources or everything concerning the school or
education which includes school buildings, classrooms, assembly halls and the
general things or facilities of education.
Login To Comment