IMPERATIVE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ON THE PERFORMANCE OF MEDIUM AND LARGE SCALE ENTERPRISES IN SOUTH WESTERN NIGERIA

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00007636

No of Pages: 179

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

$20

ABSTRACT

This study was carried out to examine the imperative of corporate governance on the performance of medium and large scale enterprises in South Western Nigeria. This study employed both primary and secondary sources of data.  A total of five hundred and forty-eight (548) employees constituted the sample size of this study and a simple random sampling method was used. The socio-economic characteristics results of the respondents showed that there were more male-owned/managed enterprises (63% and 58%) than female-owned/managed enterprises (37% and 42%) for both the medium and large-scale enterprises respectively. All of the owners/managers had some form of education, and more than half of the large and medium scale enterprises’ managers (56 and 53%) had a Degree, at least. The result showed that a very large proportion of the medium (76%) and large scale enterprises’ owners/managers (77%) were not more than 40 years of age. The effect of transparency on the innovative awareness, effect of accountability on profitability, effect of security on market shares, effect of direction on productivity of the medium and large scale enterprises in South-west Nigeria were all achieved using the 5-point Likert rating scale. From the study, all the indicators were found to be significant. Based on the results of the study, it is evident that there are positive and significant relationships between transparency, accountability, market shares, productivity and rate of return on investment as they relate to corporate governance. The formulated hypotheses all lend credence to this position. Medium and large scale enterprises need to continuously evaluate the environment that they operate in, understanding their competitors and their offerings/service as their competitiveness depends largely on the speed with which new products can be brought to the market place. Findings showed that medium and large scale enterprises differ in their use of innovative practices, this follows the fact that attention has been drawn to the potential risks associated with practicing innovative technologies and the notion that these risks may be more inhibiting for SMEs than for large enterprises; thus calling for a specific approach of these firms in innovation researches; Since large scale enterprises could receive more gains from innovations more than medium scale enterprises, researchers and practitioners need to explore the conditions under which medium scale enterprises can reap the full benefits from innovation practices while effectively managing the potential risks of becoming too dependent on external sources. To improve organizational performance and profitability, firms need to improve its accountability mechanisms in employment, promotion, motivation and compensation of staff where a compensation system ensuring employee accountability should include a significant level of autonomy.










TABLE OF CONTENT

 

Title Page                                                                                                  i

Declaration                                                                                               ii

Certification                                                                                             iii

Dedication                                                                                                 iv

Acknowledgements                                                                                  v

Table of Contents                                                                                     viii

List of Tables                                                                                            xi

Abstract                                                                                                    xii

 

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION    

1.1       Background of the Study                                                                    1

1.2       Statement of the Problem                                                                   6

1.3       Objectives of the Study                                                                      8

1.4       Research Questions                                                                            8

1.5       Research Hypotheses                                                                          9

1.6       Significance of the Study                                                                   10

1.7       Scope of the Study                                                                              10

1.8       Limitations of the Study                                                                     12

1.9       Profile of the Studied Enterprises                                                       13

1.10     Operational Definition of Terms                                                        17

 

CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1       Conceptual framework                                                                       19

2.1.1    Corporate governance                                                                        19

2.1.2    Transparency                                                                                      22

2.1.3    Accountability                                                                                     26

2.1.4    Security                                                                                               29

2.1.5    Direction                                                                                             32

2.1.6    Stakeholder relations                                                                          34

2.1.7    Market shares                                                                                      37

2.1.8    Productivity                                                                                        40

2.1.9    Return on investment (ROI)                                                               43

2.1.10  Profitability                                                                                        46

2.1.11  Innovative awareness                                                                         49

2.1.12  Corporate governance and the internal operations of the firm            53

2.1.13 Benefits of corporate governance to medium and

large scale enterprises                                                                         54

 

2.1.14  Organizational performance                                                               57

 

2.1.15  The contributions of medium and large scale enterprises

            to the Nigerian economy                                                                    59

 

2.1.16  Challenges of corporate governance in Nigeria                                 62

2.1.17  Corporate governance development in Nigeria                                 66

2.2       Theoretical framework                                                                       70

2.2.1    The stakeholder theory                                                                       70

2.2.2    Agency theory                                                                                     73

2.2.3    Stewardship theory                                                                             74

2.2.4    Resource based theory (RBT)                                                             75

2.2.5    The Endowment theory                                                                      76

2.3       Empirical review                                                                                78

2.4       Gap in literature                                                                                 88

2.5       Summary of reviewed related literature                                             89

 

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY

3.1       Research design                                                                                  90

3.2       Area of the study                                                                                90

3.3       Sources of data                                                                                   90

3.4       Population of the study                                                                       91

3.5       Sample size determination                                                                 92

3.6       Sampling techniques                                                                           93

3.7       Description of research instrument                                                    94

3.8       Validity of the research instrument                                                    94

3.9       Reliability of the research instrument                                                 95

3.10     Method of data analysis                                                                      95

3.11     Model specification                                                                            95

 

CHAPTER  4:  DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS

4.1       Data presentation                                                                                98

4.2       Data analysis                                                                                       103

4.3       Hypotheses testing                                                                              114

4.4       Discussion of results                                                                           123

 

CHAPTER  5:  SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1       Summary of findings                                                                          132

5.2       Conclusion                                                                                          136

5.3       Recommendations                                                                              137

5.4       Areas for further studies                                                                     138

5.5       Contributions to knowledge                                                               138

 

REFERENCES                                                                                             140

APPENDICES

Questionnaire administration                                                                         156

Test of hypotheses                                                                                          161

 

 

 

  

 

 


 

LIST OF TABLES

 

3.1       Tabulation of the population: medium scale enterprises           91

 

4.1       Questionnaire distribution and return for Medium

and Large Enterprises                                                                 98

 

4.2       Frequency Distribution of respondents According to Gender   99

 

 

4.3       Frequency Distribution of respondents According to Marital

Status                                                                                          99

 

4.4       Frequency distribution of respondents by level of education    101

4.5       Frequency Distribution of respondents according to age          102

4.6       Frequency distribution of the respondents by their

years of experience                                                                    103

 

4.7       Effect of transparency on innovative awareness of medium

scale enterprises in South Western Nigeria                               104

 

4.8       Effect of transparency on innovative awareness of large

scale enterprises in the South Western Nigeria                         105

 

4.9       Effect of accountability on profitability of medium scale

enterprises in South Western Nigeria                                        106

 

4.10     Effect of accountability on profitability of large scale

enterprises in South Western Nigeria                                        107

 

4.11     Effect of security on market shares of medium scale

enterprises in South Western Nigeria                                        108

 

4.12     Effect of security on market shares of large scale

enterprises in South Western Nigeria                                        109

 

4.13     Effect of direction on productivity of medium scale

enterprises in South Western Nigeria                                        110

 

4.14     Effect of direction on productivity of the large enterprises

in South Western Nigeria                                                          111

 

4.15     Relationship between stakeholder relations and ROI of

medium scale enterprises in South Western Nigeria                 112

 

4.16     Relationship between stakeholder relations and ROI of

large scale enterprises in South Western Nigeria                      113

 

4.17     Simple regression estimate of effect of transparency on

innovative awareness                                                                 114

 

4.18     Simple regression estimate of effect of accountability

on profitability                                                                           116

 

4.19     Simple regression estimate of effect of security on market

shares                                                                                         117

 

4.20     Simple regression estimate of effect of direction on

Productivity                                                                               120

 

4.21     Correlation estimate of relationship between stakeholders’

relation and ROI                                                                        122                         







                                                                      

ABBREVIATION USED IN THE STUDY

i.               CBN: Central Bank of Nigeria, the apex bank in Nigeria which supervises other banks.

ii.              LCCI: Lagos Chambers of Commerce and Industry.

iii.            MLSE: Medium and Large Scale Enterprises.

 

 


 

 

 


CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION


            1.1           BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

All over the world, the issue of corporate governance has pacified policy agenda, especially in developed market economies for more than a decade and it is gently blazing its path to the apex of the blueprint agenda on the African continent (Abor and Adjasi, 2007). It is imperative to state that, Asian crises and the relative poor performance of the corporate sector in sub-Sahara Africa have made corporate governance very paramount in the global debate (Berglot and Vonthadden, 2016).  Therefore developing countries of which Nigeria is among and where South-West region exist is no different, are presently progressively encompassing the notion of satisfactory corporate governance owing to the fact that it has the potential to consequences definitely on strategic progression (Claessens, Djankor, Fan, and Lang, 2012).  It is assumed that the essence of good governance creates shareholders benevolence through credence. Firms both medium and large scale are now improving on their corporate governance execution technique knowing full well that it encourages staff appraisal and augment the centrepiece (Claessens et al., 2012).

However, medium and large scale ventures play an essential role in the sustainable development of countries (Ifekwem and Adedamola, 2016). They help in employment creation, industrial production increase and export, social enrichment as well as political stability of which south-western Nigeria is no exception. Furthermore, it has been accepted worldwide, that good legal framework put in place by successive government spelt out the procedures and operational guidelines could give credence to medium and large scale enterprises to play critical role as catalyst   for employment creation (Ifekwem and Adedamola, 2016; Mira, 2002; Lopez and Aybar, 2010). In addition, it is paramount to note that medium and large scale ventures are seen as gadgets of profit making and advancement (Lopez and Aybar, 2010).  Governments explicitly in the underdeveloped nations have played outstanding roles in enacting policies with respect to strengthening the competency and the feasibility within which medium and large scale ventures in Nigeria of which the south west is not excluded (Ajide, Hameed and Oyetade, 2014).  Nevertheless, notwithstanding executive consortium and approach support, there is grave doubts and skepticism about whether the medium and large scale business organizations in the south-western Nigeria have performed well in the area of job creation considering their staff strength and other corporate social responsibilities (Ifekwem and Adedamola, 2016). It becomes imperative to state that medium and large scale business entities are faced with challenges which affect their potential to embark on tasks and gainfully support the growth of the nation’s economy.  This includes inconsistence government policies, poor infrastructure development, epileptic power supply, insecurity etc (Ayopo, 2011). These challenges have caused some of the medium and large sale enterprises in Nigeria (South western region) to pull out of operation, and thus; has further deepened the problem of unemployment and as well as reducing the revenue that would have been generated from these enterprises (McGahan and Porter, 2005).

However, it is expected that with proper identification and integration of key elements or components of corporate governance, like transparency, accountability, security, stakeholder relations, direction, corporate citizenship, oversight etc performance of medium and large scale business entities in south western Nigeria would be on the path of advancement (Roman, 2017).

From the forth-going, corporate governance is perceived as the procedure and composition useful in directing through overseeing transaction events of the corporation regarding building up business affluence and collaborative responsibility with the ideal aim of discerning lasting share owner usefulness as much as considering the concern and regard of other shareowners (Abor and Adjasi, 2007). Claessens, et al., (2012) opined that outstanding collaborative  body work advancing organizations via incessant entrance to sponsoring lesser value promotes efficiency and alternative appreciative approach of all stakeholders. In addition, scholarly researches have established that transparency as a component for corporate governance is useful in promoting awareness of innovation, accountability which is normally adopted as supportive tool to consummate profit, as security can help in keeping their enterprise data secure from unauthorized access thereby increasing their market shares, as direction can help the leaders and employees of the enterprises to increase their sales volume. In the long run stakeholder relations is normally integrated into corporate governance activities so as to facilitate high return on investment for the enterprises (Neil, 2012; Roman, 2017; Siaka-Momoh, 2005).

Faleye (2004) asserted that the tangible sector of the economy encompassing producing, weighty deposits and agriculture regions where some of the medium and large business organizations continues to witness tough times throughout the years. Furthermore, he observed that, the condition surfaced from the constant challenges of soaring power price, feeble customer request, policy instability, heterogeneity of imposition and charges, corporate restrictions, increasing cost of resources and devastated condition of infrastructure etc.

He postulated that if something concrete is not done to address these constraints, the substantial sector of the wealth especially the medium and large segment would continue to experience a sluggish growth if not outright stagnation (Faleye, 2004 as cited in Onugu, 2005). Corporate governance should be seen as the pivot in which the wheel of good business performance rotates around especially in medium and large scale business organizations (Ayopo, 2011).  Furthermore, it is imperative to state that, in developed countries of the world like United State of America, France, Germany, Japan, China etc where the issue of corporate governance have been fully inculcated into day-to-day business activities to large extent have started yielding a positive result (Huse, 2016).  This positive result is seen in the area of accountability, transparency, stakeholders’ relations, security etc., thereby making it possible for the continuous performance of medium and large scale business organizations (Health and Wayne, 2014).  It is equally observed that, proper application of corporate governance into the business activities of medium and large scale business entities by developed countries has helped to eradicate or minimize corruption, favouritism, nepotism, no respect to the rule of law which are characterized in developing countries of the world, including Nigeria where South-Western region is domiciled (Harding and Marc, 2016).  It is also good to say with eradication of corruption from sub-sector of medium and large scale business organizations, they can fully operate to the optimal level, thereby being able to deliver on its core mandate of job creation, profit maximization etc. as it is seen in developed countries of the world (Lahman and Weigand, 2014).

It is equally vital to review that, the incessant fraud in developing countries of the world including Nigeria (South-western region) have made it quite difficult to have direct foreign investment in the sub-sector of medium and large scale business organizations (Kuada and Hans, 2013).  This has further deepened the problem that the enterprises are facing.

Admittedly, it could be stated that the notion of corporate governance in Nigeria with respect to business is seen much on the paper or theory than in the practice.  This is because the business practitioners or owners, and even the government who promulgated the law have little or no respect to the rule of law, which is not negotiable in the notion of corporate governance unlike what the concept stands for in the developed world (Dare, 2016).  It is relevant to state that, good attributes of corporate governance is lacking in Nigerian business environs (Doi, 2013).  This is because governance comprises consensus oriented, participatory, accountable, responsive, transparent, equitable and inclusive, effective and efficient and follows the rule of law (Fuerst and Sok-Hyon, 2015).  It is vital to state that, good governance is responsible for the contemporary and upcoming needs of the enterprises, exercises prudence in decision making and policy-setting and take into record the best interests of all the stakeholders (Cho, 2014).  Furthermore, it is the rule of law that gives credence to impartial legitimate structures that are imposed by an unbiased regulatory body for the complete safeguarding of stakeholders (Bebchuk and Jesse, 2016). For corporate governance to gain momentum in Nigerian business environment, concepts of self-centeredness, nepotism, favourism, corruption and sectionalism should be eradicated. Also various government institutions saddled with this responsibility should be given the free hand to discharge their duties without interference from the higher authority of government (Demirag, 2016). Corporate governance is perceived as the structures and rules by which a firm operates.  It is basically in connection with public owned firms rather than personal ones.  Also corporate governance can be defined as the role that company executive teams or boards play in oversight direction and leadership (Kane, 2015).

However, performance is how well or poorly a firm does a particular job or activity. Performance as we understand it measures in addition to productivity, many other concepts such as the degree in which the firm meet customer expectations and the quality of working life and product quality.  Performance relates to effectiveness of how well customers’ demands are being met including the customers of medium and large scale business organizations in the South-Western, Nigeria.


1.2       STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Corporate governance in medium and large scale enterprises has special characteristics and problems. Medium and large scale enterprises can be characterized by the following traits: qualified personnel than small and medium (SMEs), good strategic vision, long-range planning, new ways of doing things, instilling training policies, ability to gather information on markets, technologies and good innovative capacity. In spite of the imperativeness of corporate governance to the development of a market economy and the advancement of growth, medium and large scale business organizations are likely experiencing a disadvantageous situation to secure the needed resources required for its development (Yacuzzi, 2005)

In spite of inadequate capital build up, there is policy somersault which gives credence to unethical practice in categorizing these enterprises.  However, there is possibility of employing unqualified manpower as a consequent of favouritism and practice of “person-organization-fit” instead of the “person-the job-fit”. This results in the manufacturing of products and services that cannot compete (sub-standard products) favourably in the international market of 21stcentury or adapting to International best practices.  There is also failure of value system syndrome and down success syndrome situations that were masterminded by failure in transparency, accountability, poor shareholders value and overturned security network that is porous and volatile.  No empirical studies have been recorded in this area. Some studies that could be relevant to this study are in the area of small and medium scale enterprises (SMEs) (Omah, et al, 2012; Osotimehin, et al, 2012; Esuh and Adebaya 2012; Bamidele, 2012; Yusuf and Dansu, 2013; Adebisi, et al., 2015). Therefore, it is on this premise that the study seeks to explore the imperativeness of corporate governance on the performance of medium and large scale enterprises in South Western, Nigeria.


1.3       OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The broad objective of the study is to examine the imperative of corporate governance on the performance of medium and large scale enterprises in South Western Nigeria. The specific objectives are to;

i.               determine the effect of transparency on innovative awareness of medium and large scale enterprises in South Western, Nigeria.

ii.              examine the effect of accountability on profitability of medium and large scale enterprises in the South-Western Nigeria.

iii.            ascertain the effect of security on market shares of the medium and large scale enterprises in the South Western, Nigeria.

iv.            examine the effect of direction on productivity of the medium and large scale enterprises in the South-Western, Nigeria.

v.              analyze the relationship between stakeholder relations and return on investment (ROI) of the medium and large scale enterprises in the South Western, Nigeria.

 

1.4       RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The following research questions guided the study;

i.                      What is the effect of transparency on innovative awareness of medium and large scale enterprises in South-Western, Nigeria?

ii.                    What is the effect of accountability on profitability of the medium and large scale enterprises in South –Western, Nigeria?

iii.                   What is the effect of security on market shares of medium and large scale enterprises in South –Western, Nigeria?

iv.                   What is the effect of direction on productivity of the medium and large scale enterprises in the South –Western, Nigeria?

v.                     Is there any relationship between stakeholder relations and return on investment (ROI) of the medium and large scale enterprises in the South –Western, Nigeria?

 

1.5       RESEARCH HYPOTHESES

The following hypotheses were stated in null form to guide the study;

Ho1:      Transparency has no significant effect on innovative awareness of medium and large scale enterprises in the South –Western, Nigeria.

Ho2:      Accountability has no significant effect on profitability of the medium and large scale enterprises in the South –Western, Nigeria.

Ho3:      security has no significant effect on market shares of the medium and large scale enterprises in the South –Western, Nigeria.

Ho4:      Direction has no significant effect on productivity of the medium and large scale enterprises in the South –Western, Nigeria.

Ho5:      There is no significant relationship between stakeholder relations and return on investment (ROI) of the medium and large scale enterprises in the South –Western, Nigeria.


1.6        SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

The study is significant in many respects:

i.               Managers – Managers will use the study the source of core competence for designing and integrating corporate governance components that will help to influence the process and procedure of strategic planning in their enterprises. Again the study will assist the managers during the process of recruiting and selection of employees for their enterprises.

ii.              Government – Government would see the research findings for policy making especially in the area of promoting and regulating activities of medium and large scale business organizations in the South –Western region and , Nigeria as the whole, as the legal framework as suggested in the research work.

iii.            Students and Lecturers – The research findings will constitute a source of knowledge to students and researchers to augment their classroom learning activities in the area of medium and large scale companies in Nigeria.

iv.            General Public – The research findings will help the general public to have an in-depth knowledge on the activities of medium and large scale enterprises, especially in the area of recruiting and selection.

 

 

1.7       SCOPE OF THE STUDY

i.          Content Scope

This research focussed mainly on the imperative of corporate governance on the performance of medium and large scale enterprises in South –West, Nigeria. The study was carried out in the South-West part of Nigeria precisely in Lagos, Ogun, and Ibadan. This is imperative because of the strategic importance of the states in operating medium and large scale business firms.

ii.         Context Scope

The study was limited to CEOs, management and employees of medium and large scale business organizations in the above mentioned states.  The selected medium and large scale enterprises include the following: – Accion Bank Ltd, ARM Pension Ltd, C & L Leasing and Central Securities Clearing System (CSCS) Access Bank Plc, Newrest Airline Services, Logistics Plc (ASL), Dangote Cement Plc, Guinness Nigeria Plc, Unilever Nigeria Plc and Vitafoam Nigeria.

iii.        Unit Scope

The study focused specifically on the following areas: effect of transparency on innovative awareness of medium and large scale business firms, effect of accountability on profitability of the medium and large scale enterprises, the relationship between security and market shares of medium and large scale business organizations, the influence of direction on productivity of the medium and large scale enterprises, the relationship between stakeholders relation and return investment of medium and large scale business organizations.

iv.        Geographical Scope

The study was carried out in the South-Western part of Nigeria, precisely in Lagos, Ogun and Oyo States.  Lagos State occupied about 3,577km2 is bounded on the North and East by Ogun State.  In the West it shares boundaries with the Republic of Benin to the South territorial land area of 351,861 hectares – Ogun State is bounded to the South by Lagos, Oyo and Osun States to the North, Ondo State to the East and the Republic of Benin to the West.  It has land mass of 16,762 square km, while Oyo State covers appropriately an area of 28,454 square kilometres. It is bounded to the South by Ogun, in the North by Kwara State, in the West by Republic of Benin, while in the East by Osun State.

v.         Methodology Scope

The survey design adopted in this study is the used of structured questionnaire.  Total of four thousand seven hundred and Eighty (4780) employees of ten medium and large enterprises constitute the population of the study.  Simple regression model and correlation model were employed to test the hypotheses of the study.

vi.        Time Scope

The study covers the period between 2018-2021.

 

1.8       LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

The researcher in the course of carrying out this study which was based on imperative of corporate governance on the performance of medium and large scale enterprises in South-West Nigeria encountered some challenges which affected the efficiency and effectiveness in the realization of data for the achievement of the research objectives.  Some of them are poor attitude from some of the respondents in giving out information, the scope of the study, statistical models used for the analysis of data.


1.9       PROFILE OF THE STUDIED ENTERPRISES

i.          Accion Bank Ltd

Accion Microfinance Bank Limited was incorporated in May 2006 with Mr. Taiwo Adesina to carry on microfinance banking business and was granted an operating license by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) in April, 2007.  Accion bank commenced business operation in May 2007.  The management team comprises seasoned and distinguished professionals from different background, complemented by the expertise of their technical partners, Accion international.  The bank was established in 2007 with the mission to economically empowerment micro-entrepreneurs and low-income earners by providing financial services in ethical, sustainable and profitable manner.  It has employees of about 64 and capital base of N3 billion.

ii.         ARM Pension Managers

ARM Pension Managers (PFA) Ltd is one of the first seven Pension Fund Administrators granted license by the national pension commission in December 2005.  It vision is to be the fastest growing, most efficient and customer-friendly PFA in Nigeria, consistently delivering value to their esteem customers.  However, their mission is to provide a better future for their esteem customer by offering superior service and value and upholding high standards of professionalism.  Then core values are driven by the vision of tomorrow Mr. Emmanuel Ikazoboh Wale is the C.E.O. of the company.  The company specializes in retirement plans such as contributory pension scheme among others.

iii.        C and L Leasing Company Plc

The C and L Leasing Company was established in 1991 to provide both operating and finance leases to companies as well as other financing products, and invoice discounting.  Equipment leased by C and L Leasing includes computers barges, houseboats, cranes, cars, tugboats, plant and machinery and trucks. Mr. Andrew Ojike Odibi is the CEO.  The company has a capital base of N16.3 billion Naira.  The mission of C and L Leasing is to provide customers with quality leasing and ancillary service solutions to meet their unique needs of world class systems and procedures.  Through innovation the leasing and ancillary service company of choice for any discerns Lessee in West Africa.

iv.        Central Securities Clearing System (CSCS)

The Central Securities Clearing System (CSCS) is Nigeria’s central securities depository licensed to carry on the depository clearing and settlement of all transactions in the Nigerian capital market. For more than two decades, CSCS has continuously partnered with other stakeholders in redefining the structure and operations of the Nigerian capital market, leveraging new technologies in extracting efficiencies across the transaction life cycle while providing assurance in post-trade execution.  The mission of the company is to create value by providing securities depository clearing, settlement and other services driven by innovative technology and a highly skilled workforce.  The CSCS was incorporated in July, 1992 as a financial market infrastructure.  It commenced operation in April, 1997. Haruna Jalo-Waziri is the managing director and chief Executive Officer.


v.         Access Bank

Access Bank is presently one of the five largest banks in Nigeria in terms of assets, loans, deposits and branch network.  It has total assets of N7 trillion, and more than 600 branches.  The bank has over 900,000 shareholders, including many Nigerian and international institutional investors in December 19, 1988 Access bank was issued a banking license.  Access bank was listed on the Nigerian stock exchange in November, 18, 1989, Mr. Herbert Wigwe is CEO of Access bank.

 

vi.        Vitafoam Nigeria Plc

Vitafoam Nigeria Plc engages in the manufacture of foam products.  It operates through the foam products and furniture/other products segments of flexible and rigid foam based products, and memory foams.  The company was founded on August 4, 1962 and its headquartered in Ikeja, Nigeria, Vitafoam Nigeria Plc, is a Nigeria–based company, which is engaged in the manufacturing and sale of flexible and reconstituted foam products. The foam products segment includes flexible and rigid foam-based products as well as memory foams. Mr. Taiwo Adeniyi is the group Managing Director.  Vitafoam Nigeria Plc has N15.4 billion as a capital based.  It was incorporated into Nigerian stock exchange in 1978.

 

vii.       Unilever Nigeria Plc

Unilever Nigeria Plc manufactures and markets consumer product primarily in the home personal care and foods categories.  The company sells products such as Omo washing, powder, key soap, Royco, toothpaste, baby care goods, Vaseline petroleum, among others.  Carl Raymond Cruz is CEO/Managing Director.  It was established on 11 April, 1923.  It has the operational capital base of N12.95 billion.  It was Robert Hesketh that opened a trading post in Nigeria under the business name lever brother (West Africa Ltd).


viii.      Guinness Nigeria Plc

Guinness Nigeria Plc is a beverage manufacturing company.  The company offers beverages under various categories, such as spirits, bears, ready-to-drink and non-alcoholic.  The first bottle of Guinness foreign Extra Stout in Nigeria was brewed on the 30th of November 1963, three years after Nigeria independence.  Guinness Nigeria plc has a capital base of over N354 billion. Mr. Baker Magunda is the Managing Director of Guinness Nigeria Plc, while the former CEO, Peter Ndegwa took over a new role of Guinness Parent Company Diageo Plc. This is Guinness fourth CEO in five years. Guinness Nigeria a subsidiary of Diageo Plc of the United Kingdom was incorporated in 1962 with the building of a brewery in Ikeja, the heart of Lagos.

 

ix.        Newrest ASL Nigeria Plc

Newrest ASL Nigeria Plc provides catering and related services.  The company operates an in-flight catering facilities, lounges, and aviation industry operating in Nigeria.  Laurent Moussard is the managing director/CEO of Newrest ASL Nigeria Plc. The company was established in 1996 to provide catering and related services to airlines operating in Nigeria.  The meaning of “ASL” is Airline Services and Logistics.  The company has a capital base of N1.03 billion.


x.         Dangote Cement Plc

Dangote Cement Plc is a producer of cement and operates plants for the preparation manufacture and distribution of cement and related products. The company through its subsidiaries, is engaged in exploration, coal production, cement grinding, power production and limestone mining operation, among others. Dangote Cement is a subsidiary of Dangote Industries, which was founded by Aliko Dangote in 1981 as a trading business with an initial focus on importation of bagged cement and other commodities such as rice, sugar, flour, salt and fish.  Over time, the group began to import bulk cement into the Apapa and Port Harcourt terminals, which it then bagged for distribution.  Through the 1990s, the group made a strategic decision to transition from a trading based business into a fully-fledged integrated manufacturing operation.  It has a capital base of over N895 billion. It was established in 1992, the CEO/Managing Director is Aliko Dangote.


1.10    OPERATIONAL DEFINITION OF TERMS

i.               Corporate Governance: Corporate governance involves the correlation between the internal governance procedures of companies and public’s formulation of the range of corporate responsibility.

ii.              Large Enterprises: Any venture whose capital base including operating assets but excluding cost of land is above three hundred million Naira (N300,000,000) and/or a workforce of over two hundred (200) employees and have yearly gain of higher than twenty million Naira (N20,000,000) only.

iii.            Medium Enterprise: A firm with overall cost including operating assets while eliminating cost of land of more than one hundred million naira (N100,000,000) but less than three hundred million naira (N300,000,000) and have the staff strength of between seventy-one (71) and two hundred (200) fulltime workers, with an annual turnover of not more than twenty million naira (N20,000,000) only.

iv.            Transparency: In commonest terms, transparency refers to having nothing to hide.  For a firm, it simply connotes open processes and transactions observable to outsiders.

v.              Accountability: It means scheming formation/describing association and evaluations of sole efficiency to guarantee responsibility for transaction outcomes.

vi.            Security: Things that are done to keep the firms safe from danger or crime enabling environment sustainability.

vii.           Direction: It means providing a perception of motivation and illustrates central rationale for the corporations’ activities.

viii.         Stakeholder Relations: It means balancing investor interests with concern further stakeholders such as customers, employees and business partners.

ix.            Strategic vision:  A strategic vision statement supports the mission statement, but is more tangible. It describes an achievable future state of an organization—exact timelines may vary, but typically range from three to 10 years. This statement should help you and your employees visualize where the organization is headed.

x.              Productivity is commonly defined as a ratio between the output volume and the volume of inputs. One of the most widely used measures of productivity is Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per hour worked. This measure captures the use of labour inputs better than just output per employee

xi.            Return on investment (ROI) is a performance measure used to evaluate the efficiency or profitability of an investment or compare the efficiency of a number of different investments. ROI tries to directly measure the amount of return on a particular investment, relative to the investment's cost.

xii.           Innovative Awareness: A brand is at the core of a company's success. A solid, trusted brand is necessary in order for your company to prosper.

xiii.         Profitability is a measurement of efficiency – and ultimately its success or failure. A further definition of profitability is a business's ability to produce a return on an investment based on its resources in comparison with an alternative investment.

xiv.         Market Share   is the percentage of total sales (by value) or total output that a business has in a specified market. For example, for many years Coca Cola has enjoyed a market share of around 40-45% of sales of carbonated drinks in the United States.



Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment