HYDROBIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND LAND COVER DYNAMICS OF THE IMO RIVER ESTUARY NIGER DELTA NIGERIA

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00009414

No of Pages: 185

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦10000

ABSTRACT

The hydrobiological characteristics of the Imo River Estuary in Nigeria as well as the land cover dynamics of it’s surrounding wetlands, were investigated. Selected physico-chemical parameters (Temperature, DO, BOD, Conductivity, Nitrates and Nitrites, Salinity, Phosphates, TSS, pH, TDS, Transparency, NH4, Pb, Zn, Cu and Cd) and the biological parameters which includes phytoplankton, zooplankton and fish species were analysed to determine the present condition of the water body and how it affects fish catch, abundance and diversity. Based on these findings, land cover change was analysed to ascertain any changes in the intergrity of the estuary within a thirty years span, to  detect any perturbations that could have affected the intergrity of the river. Samples were collected bi-monthly between April 2015 and March 2016, covering the dry and wet seasons of the year at 3 stations namely, Kalibiama, Opobo and Queenstown.. Variations observed in the physicochemical parameters were affected more in the seasonal scale than the spatial, as Pb, PO4, and TSS were the only parameters significantly different at p≤0.05 between the stations.  The water quality of the estuary was examined by comparing means of parameters to Federal Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Ministry of Environment and World Health Organisation’s acceptable standards. Parameters that exceeded regulatory units were cadmium, lead and nickel against FMENV standards of 0.33, 0.05 and 0.5mg/l respectively, suggesting a slightly chemically polluted environment. A total of 2,738 individuals from 4 phyla (Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta, Euglenophyta and Cyanophyta) were recorded for phytoplankton. Shannon  diversity index were used to determine abundance and diversity of plankton and fish. The diversity results showed values which suggests a slightly polluted ecosystem. The correlation of the plankton and environmental parameters indicated that phytoplankton correlated both positively and negatively with parameters such as TDS (P<0.003), salinity(P<0.002), cadium(p<0.038), zooplankton(P<0.048), pH( p<0.006), conductivity(P<0.003) and negatively with  BOD at (P<0.032). A total of 1950 individuals in 22 fish species consisting of 13 families were collected during the study period from artisanal fisheries landings. The Carrangids and Clupeids made up the dominant fisheries of the estuary. A Remote Sensing analysis of the study area within a period of thirty years, 1986, 2000 and 2016 showed that the mangrove ecosysytem had been depleted by 17% to crop and grassland within this period, the implication of this is an increase in silt sediment and nutrient load from run off into the river by the nearby crop and grassland. Also an increase in the human settlements was witnesed at 3.4% total area (723.456 hectares) causing increased waste discharges into the river. It is recommended that constant policy regulation and compliance checks should be carried out on coastal wetlands to reduce degradation.






TABLE OF CONTENT


Title Page                                                                                                                                i

Declaration                                                                                                                             ii

Dedication                                                                                                                              iii

Certification                                                                                                                           iv

Acknowledgement                                                                                                                  v

Table of Content                                                                                 vii

List of Tables                                                                                                                          xi

List of Figures                                                                                                                         xv

List of Plates                                                                                                    xvii

List of Abbreviation and Acronyms                                                                                     xviii

Abstract                                                                                                                      xix

 

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1       Background of the Study                                                                                            1          

1.2       Statement of the Problem                                                                                           5

1.3       Justification of the Study                                                                                              6

1.4       Aim and Objectives of the Study                                                                                   7

1.5       Scope of the Study                                                                                                          8

 

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW     

2.1       Overview                                                                                                                    9

2.2       Monitoring the Aquatic Ecosystem                                                                        11

2.3       Applied Strategies and Tools for Fisheries Development.                             15

2.4       Commercial Fish Stocks of The Nigerian Brackish Waters                        16

2.4.1    The clupeidae                                                                                                 18

2.4.2    The carangidae                                                                                               18

2.4.3    The sciaenidae                                                                                              19

2.5        Environmental Factors in Fish Abundance and Distribution.                        20

2.6       Mangroves:  A Coastal Resource                                                                     23

                           

2.7       Micro-Invertebrates and Plankton as Bio-Indicators                                                25

2.8       The Role of GIS and Remote Sensing in Aquatic Resource Management   26

2.8.1    Description of the Landsat satellite sensor                                                   29

 

CHAPTER 3: MATERIALS AND METHODS

3.1       The Study Area                                                                                                  31

3.2        Experimental Procedure And Analysis                                                            34

3.2.1     Experimental design                                                                                         34

3. 2 .2   Data collection                                                                                                  34

3.2.3 Experimental procedure                                                                                         34

3.2.4    Sample collection                                                                                           40

3.3       Laboratory Procedures                                                                                        41

3.3.1    Determination of physico-chemical parameters                                                 41

3.3.2    Determination of fish catch                                                                            43

3.4       Image Data Processing                                                                       44

3.5       Data Analysis                                                                                                          53

3.5.1    Statistical analysis                                                                                          53

3.5.2    Fish  data analysis                                                                                           61

3.5.3    Fish diversity index                                                                                        61

 

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1       Spatial and Temporal Variations in Physico-chemical Parameters of Imo River Estuary              57

4.1.1    Spatial variation                                                                                  57

4.1.2    Temporal variation                                                                             57                                                                                                             

4.1.3    Principal component analysis                                                              62

4.1.4    Spatial correlation of Physico-chemical parameters                          71

4.1.5    Temporal correlations of Physico-chemical parameters                                79

4.2       The Water Quality of the Imo River Estuary                                                 83

4.2.1     Temperature                                                                                         102

4.2.2    pH                                                                                                                   102

4.2.3    Dissolved oxygen                                                                                           103

4.2.4    Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)                                                             103

4.2.5    Transparency                                                                                                  104

4.2.6    Conductivity                                                                                                   104

4.2.7    Salinity                                                                                                           105

4.2.8    Total dissolved solids (TDS)                                                                          105

4.2.9    Ammonium Ion                                                                                              106

4.2.10  Nitrates, nitrites, and phosphates                                                                    107

4.2.11  Total suspended solids                                                                                    107

4.2.12  The metals (Copper, Zinc, Lead, Cadmium and Nickel)                               108

4.3       The Plankton of Imo River Estuary.                                                   111

4.4       Fish Catch, Abundance, and Species Diversity                                              120

4.5.      Length/Weight Relationship and Condition Factor of Fish Catch in the Imo River Estuary        126

4.6       The Effect of Environmental Parameters on Plankton Abundance                        140

4.7       Remote Sensing                                                                                              146

4.7.1    Land cover change                                                                                         146

4.7.2    Accuracy assessment                                                                                      156                                                                          

4.7.3    Mapping coastal erosion through suspended sediment  index.                    159

CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1        Conclusion                                                                                                162

5.2           Recommendations                                                                                          163     

5.3           Contribution to Knowledge                                                                            164

            REFERENCES

APPENDICES

 

 

 

 

LIST OF TABLES

4.1       Summary of analysis of variance for spatial variations in the

physico-chemical parameters of the estuary.                                                 58

4.2       Summary for seasonal variations in the physico-chemical parameters of the estuary 60

4.3       Table of component weights for the physico-chemical parameters.                            65

4.4       Physico-chemical parameters that significantly correlate with pc1                        65

4.5       Physico-chemical parameters that significantly correlate with pc2                        66

4.6       Pearson’s correlation matrix for kalibiama station in the Imo R iver estuary 80

4.7       Pearson’s correlation matrix for opobo station in the Imo River estuary 75

4.8       Pearson’s correlation matrix for queens town station in the Imo River estuary.76

4.9       Pearson’s correlation matrix for dry season in the Imo River estuary 77

4.10     Pearson’s correlation matrix for the wet season in the Imo River estuary 81

4.11     Spatial variation in plankton diversity in Imo River estuary                        113

4.12     Temporal variation in plankton diversity in Imo River estuary.                        114

4.13     Abundance and diversity of fish species per station in the

Imo River estuary                                                                                           121

4.14     Showing abundance and diversity of fish species per station in the

Imo River estuary                                                                                           122

4.15     Length-weight relationship and condition factor of cynoglossus in Kalibiama,

Opobo and Queen town during wet and dry season.                                      127

4.16     Length-weight relationship and condition factor of carangidae in Kalibiama,

Opobo and Queentown during the wet and dry season                                        127

4.17     Length-weight relationship and condition factor of clupeidae in Kalibiama,

Opobo and Queentown during the wet and dry season                                  128

4.18     Length-weight relationship and condition factor of lutjanidae in Kalibiama,

Opobo and Queentown during the wet and dry season                                  129

4.19     Length-weight relationship and condition factor of mugilidae in Kalibiama,

Opobo and Queentown during the wet and dry season                                  130

4.20     Length-weight relationship and condition factor of clarotidae in Kalibiama,

Opobo and Queen town during the wet and dry season                                 131

4.21     Length-weight relationship and condition factor of sciaenidae in Kalibiama,

Opobo and Queentown during the wet and dry season                                  132

4.22     Length-weight relationship and condition factor of cichlidae in Kalibiama,

Opobo and Queentown during the wet and dry season                                              133

4.23     Length-weight relationship and condition factor of trichiudae in Kalibiama,

Opobo and Queentown during the wet and dry season.                                        134

 4.24    Length-weight relationship and condition factor of sphyraenidae in Kalibiama,

Opobo and Queentown during the wet and dry season.                                           135                

4.25     Length-weight relationship and condition factor of polynemidae  in Kalibiama,

Opobo and Queentown during the wet and dry season.                                         136

 4.26    Length-weight relationship and condition factor of carcharhinidae in Kalibiama,

Opobo and Queentown during the wet and dry season                                  137                                       

4.27     Length-weight relationship and condition factor of eleotridae in Kalibiama,

Opobo and Queento during the wet and dry season.                                      138

4.28    The effect of physico-chemical parameters on phytoplankton                                    142     

4.29     The effect of heavy metals on phytoplankton.                                               143

4.30    Pearson’s correlation matrix for physicochemical parameters, heavy metals

and plankton, in the Imo River estuary.                                 144

 4.31   Change detected in pixel percent by year, in the Imo River estuary                        150

 4.32   Confusion matrix, computed using envi software, for 1986 image                        156

4.33    Confusion  matrix, computed from envi software for 2000 image.                        157

4.34    Confusion  matrix, computed from envi software for 2016 image.                         158

 


 




LIST OF FIGURES

3.1       Map of the study area                                                                32

3.2       Monthly rainfall data for study area.                                                                 35

3.3       Steps taken for processing the remote sensing images.                                     47

 

4.1       PCA biplot of the physico-chemical variables based PC1 and PC2.                64

4.2       Variation in physico-chemical parameters of the studied stations in

Imo River estuary based PC1 and PC3                                               67

4.3       Seasonal variation (wet and dry seasons) in physico-chemical parameters

of the  Imo River estuary based on PC1 and PC2.                                         68                         

4.4        Temporal variation (months) in physico-chemical parameters of the in

Imo River estuary based on PC1 and PC2                                                      69

4.5       Spatial and temporal variations in temperature (̊c).                                       84

4.6       Spatial and temporal variations in ph                                                                         85

4.7       S patial and temporal variations in dissolved oxygen  (mg/l)                                    86

4.8       Spatial and temporal variations in biochemical oxygen demand (mg/l)  87

4.9       Spatial and temporal variations in transparency (cm).                                   88

4.10     Spatial and temporal variations conductivity (µs/cm)                                    89

4.11     Spatial and temporal variations salinity (ppt).                                                90

4.12     Spatial and temporal variations total dissolved solids (mg/l)                         91

4.13     Spatial and temporal variations in phosphates (mg/l)                                    92

4.14     Spatial and temporal variations in ammonium ion (NH4+ ) mg/l                 93

4.15     Spatial and temporal variations in nitrate (N03) mg/l                                    94

4.16     Spatial and temporal variations in nitrite (N02) mg/l.                                     95

4.17     Spatial and temporal variations in total suspended solids (tss) mg/l.                        96

4.18     Spatial and temporal variations in copper (Cu) mg/l                                     97

4.19     Spatial and temporal variations in zinc (Zn) mg/l                                          98

4.20     Spatial and temporal variations in cadmium(Cd) mg/l                                  99

4.21     Spatial and temporal variations in lead(Pb) mg/l.                                          100

4.22     Spatial and temporal variations in nickel(Ni) mg/l                                        101

4.23     Phytoplankton phyla per sampling station in the dry season                         115        

4.24     Phytoplankton phyla per sampling station in the wet season.                      116

4.25     Frequency of zooplankton phyla per sampling station in the dry season 117

4.26     Frequency of zooplankton phyla per sampling station in the wet season. 118

4.27     Spatial total suspended sediment rates in the Imo River estuary, showing bank erosion in queenstown (sample area 3a).                                            160

 

 




 

LIST OF PLATES


3.1        The Kalibiama sampling station                                                                    36

3.2        The Opobo sample station, showing the jetty area.                                  36

3.3         Opobo sample station, showing a refuse dump by the river.                              37       

3.4         Queens town sample station, showing an abandoned fishing village.      38

3.5          Queens town sample station, showing a defunct oil well.                    39

3.6          Samples of Lutjanus goreensis                                                               45

3.7         A catch of Psuedotolitus species.                                                            46

3.8          Landsat5 TM raw spatial images of the Bight of Bonny in 1986, in true and

        false colour composite. source: United States Geological Survey ( USGS).49

3.9          Landsat 7 ETM raw spatial images of the Bight of Bonny in 2000, in true and

       false colour composite. source: United States Geological Survey ( USGS).  49

3.10      Landsat 8, raw spatial images of the Bight of Bonny in 2016, in true and false 

colour composite. source: United States Geological Survey ( USGS).            50

3.11     Subset images of 2000 Landsat7 TM,  in a true and false colour composite. 50      

3.12        USGS 2016 digital image of the Imo River estaury, classified using the ENVI software.                 140

3.13        USGS 2000 digital image of the Imo River estaury, classified using the ENVI software.                 141

3.14     USGS 1986 digital image of the Imo River estaury, Classified using the ENVI Software.                                               142

4.1           USGS 2016 digital image of the Imo River estaury, classified using the  ENVI software.                                        147

4.2           USGS 2000 digital image of the Imo River estaury, classified using the  ENVI software.                            148

4.3         USGS 1986 digital image of the Imo River estaury, classified using the ENVI software.                 149

4.4       Mangrove (Rhizophora mangle) on the bank of the Imo River estuary at Akwa-Ibom State, Nigeria                         153

4.5       Mangrove (Rhizophora racemosa) by the bank of the estuary at                                                 Utaewa, Akwa-Ibom State, Nigeria.                                    154

4.6       Nypa palm (Nypa fruiticans) by the bank of the Imo River                                                             estuary at Opobo, Rivers State.                                              155

4.7       Processed Images of normalised difference suspended                                                                               sediment index (NDSSI), showing radiance values                           159

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1       BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Over the years, the anthropogenic effects of man's activities have been recorded by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), as the cause of certain environmental changes seen today (UNEP,2011). These activities range from developmental to socio-economic, and cultural values which contribute to degradation, and therefore the need to build and support sustainable development through ecosystem management. The aquatic habitats are one of the most exploited and have seen immense degradation as man's dependence on fish and aquatic resources for food and development are insatiable.

The assumption that the decline of the fisheries and fish resources in most water bodies is because of overfishing, has been challenged by authors in different parts of the world as management practices and regulations which were put  in place to reduce fishing pressure has yielded limited results (Beamish and Bouillon (1993) as cited in (Mann, 2000).They went ahead to suggest that the synchronous variations in depth, nutrient fluxes, recruitments, and climate patterns, were considered responsible for the changes in catches of sardines from stocks of the Pacific coasts. Therefore, species abundance can be attributed to fishing regulations and management practices which help to keep stocks. Also, spatial and temporal variations in physicochemical parameters vary water quality and when similar within regions, produces the same pattern of abundance and catch.

Coastal wetlands are characterised by mangrove swamps within the tropics and play huge roles in aquatic habitats (Barg,1992). These watersheds serve as breeding grounds, a refuge for juvenile fishes to avoid predation and sink for alluvial deposits. Therefore, the sustainable management of coastal watersheds and estuaries will help in keeping the integrity of our wetlands, to support a stable and sustainable economy through fisheries. Coastal communities and water bodies have to be protected from the impacts of climate change and other anthropogenic sources of degradation. To reduce the vulnerability of our coastal wetlands to climate change, a lot of attention is needed in other to develop mitigation measures and create strategies to maintain a sustainable balance in water bodies and coastal wetlands. Some of these strategies involve a study of the hydrobiology of the water body and its hydrological processes.

Rivers transport substances from runoff through its course which is eventually deposited downstream. The physicochemical characteristics of these deposits, as well as tidal fluctuations, accounts for the dynamic nature of estuaries (Zheng et al., 2002). Hydrobiological studies, therefore, help in monitoring the quality and quantity of spatial and temporal variations of the aquatic ecosystems and how the impact of these properties affect biotic communities and diversities of species. While hydrobiology is the study of life, in water, hydrology refers to the movement and volume of water in and around a wetland and how they influence ecology which includes plant growth, fauna distribution and species abundance (Glamore, 2013). 

The River continuum of a water body is the varying gradients of the water body along its course. This also determines the energy and nutrient content as different spatial conditions give varying results with regards to biota. (Odum,1980). Seasonal variations determined by rainfall and weather conditions alter nutrient influxes and restructure aquatic assemblages. There is also the factor of biogeochemical cycles, anthropogenic factors which affect species diversity or alter the composition of water quality. Changes from regenerated habitats caused by mangrove deforestation and destruction of aquatic vegetation bring about the introduction of non-native species which alter these communities and declination of flora and fauna.

Aquatic organisms depend on each other as well as their environment to live. When the ecosystem is degraded, its ability to absorb stresses becomes exceeded.  Physical and chemical alterations are from changes in temperature, flow, bio-stimulatory nutrients and toxins in form of heavy metals while biological alterations could emerge from introduction of exotic species or over-harvesting of stock (Oguntade et al., 2014; Chilaka et al., 2014 and Olopade et al., 2017). On the other hand, when these parameters are at optimal levels, maximum productivity is witnessed and the integrity of the ecosystem is assured.

Habitat loss and its pressure on the integrity of water resources have brought about improved practices in the traditional methods of water quality monitoring. These practices, for instance, the use of biomonitors like fish and micro-invertebrae monitoring tools give reliable and early warning signs to the condition of the water resource. Stock assessment is also an avenue for monitoring habitat condition. Masese et al. (2013) indicate that using biota for monitoring is more cost-effective and indicative of environmental degradation in these aquatic habitats than traditional water quality practices.

In estuarine environments, the main component of hydrology is tide and the influence of tide cuts across all the habitats in the wetland which might be a determinant factor as to the water quality, growth, and abundance of floral and faunal species. Intertidal wetlands, which consists of various categories of biomes are not overlooked as they play a major role in tropical estuarine systems and brackish environments. Mangroves are a group of highly adapted halophytes occupying the intertidal zone in estuaries, lagoons, and coastal mudflats of tropical and subtropical areas. These salt-tolerant marine tidal evergreen forests include trees, shrubs, palms, epiphytes and ferns in most areas of tropical and subtropical latitudes.  They have a prominent role in this community as they fuel the trophic web with withered leaves and detrital matter. They have been found to enhance and sustain the natural biomass of coral reef fish as well as breeding grounds for many fish fauna. Furthermore, mangrove forests enhance water quality by trapping nutrients and heavy metals (Somero, 2012).

Nonetheless, all over the world mangrove ecosystems and the hydrological integrity of coastal systems are threatened with destruction through various forms of anthropogenic activities, in particular, utilization of coastal resources, pollution, and land reclamation (Omogoriola et al., 2012). Within the lists of human-induced pressure on the mangrove forests in Nigeria, pollution from crude oil activities tops the chart and is still a source of concern for ecologists. However, the presence of vast expanse of wetland vegetation within a coastal environment serves as a sink for these heavy metals and therefore a mitigating factor (Held et al., 2003). They argue that the species richness of mangroves in many geographical areas is decreasing over time as a result of socio-economic activities bringing about overexploitation by traditional users. Replacement and degradation as a consequence of development are all major problems of mangrove environments and have been predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that climate change will have more effect in Sub-Saharan Africa. Thus the need to use natural resource management tools like Remote sensing which analyse vast expanse of land-cover with little or no contact to the sites. This space-borne\airborne sensor system data acquisition and observation have profoundly changed the practice, monitoring, and understanding of the dynamics of coastal environments.

Scientists in developing countries around the coastal environments are faced with the challenge of fighting the effects of climate change and other anthropogenic degradation using remote sensing techniques so as to retain the services rendered by these natural habitats to the environment among many others such as maintaining water quality, absorbing inland floodwaters, protecting the shoreline and the aforementioned nursery for terrestrial and marine species as well as retaining bio-diversity (McCoy, 2005). Therefore, these and many more ecological values are the reasons why mangrove and tidal wetland conservation are key factors in aquatic resource management.

1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

The Imo River has over the years been a source of aquatic resource to four Nigerian states which it passes through before it empties into the sea. This River and its tributaries are affected by anthropogenic sources of pollution through land-use. Runoff from agricultural lands, refuse disposal by urban and indigenous communities, industrial effluent discharges and many more are the point and non-point pollution sources which end up affecting its habitat quality, especially the estuary which is the downstream area and the sink where sedimentation process take place. The choice of the Imo River estuary for this research was informed by past and present industrial activities around its wetlands which range from an Aluminum company to Oil wells and refinery activities in the downstream area of the River within the past few decades. Even though oil exploration activities around the Imo River communities have been discontinued for over a decade,  there has been a reduction of ichytofauna in aquatic communities within its reaches due to acid rain (Etesin et al., 2013).

 

It has become increasingly important to identify and inventory the current extent and condition of coastal wetlands and its River basins, especially in Nigeria where spatial and in-situ data on wetlands are relatively scarce and still evolving. Few studies have been carried out on the Imo River Estuary. Akpan (2013) studied the species composition and Abundance in the Utaewa creek, a major tributary to the Imo river estuary, Akoma and Osondu (2008) studied the phytoplankton and nutrient dynamics of the Imo river estuary. Etesin et al.(2013) carried out studies on the seasonal variation of physicochemical parameters of  the Iko River which is also a tributary of the Imo river . However, none has studied the hydrobiology of the estuary in relation to its changing landcovers. This study fills the gap in research through mixed scale methods built on descriptive statistics, GIS and remote sensing techniques by analyzing spatially referenced satellite data to buttress ecological findings on the Imo river estuary relating to fish and its habitat.

 

1.3 JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY

Sub-Saharan Africa and their coastal areas are most prone to the effects of climate change which include accelerated erosion, sea-level rise, saltwater intrusion into inland waters, stronger storms and warmer ocean temperatures which are likely to disturb sensitive marine ecosystems and damage the coastal environment as well as public infrastructure (Akhionbare, 2009). Presently, various coastal States in advanced economies are preparing for and have set up mitigation strategies against the impacts of climate change. The creation of climate-ready estuaries and improving fishing practices are key to a sustainable fisheries economy (NOAA, 2013). It is, therefore, necessary to carry out research on the present state of our estuaries in order to identify early, the changes in their conditions.

This study will provide local officials, researchers, and the state government, an overview of the riparian corridors draining into the estuary, an understanding of the land-cover trends within these areas, the water quality of the estuary and the effects of these trends on the fisheries and abundance of aquatic flora and fauna. It will also serve as a baseline study upon which subsequent studies will be hinged on to provide best management practices for our estuaries in Nigeria.

1.4  AIM AND OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The aim of this work is to study the physicochemical  parameters of the estuary in order to determine whether these traits show differences in space and time so as to know the hydrobiological status of the estuary and how these attributes affect flora and fauna.

To achieve the general aim of the study, the following objectives were developed.

      i.         Determine the spatial and temporal variations in the physicochemical parameters and the water quality of the estuary.

     ii.         Investigate the distribution and diversity of plankton within the estuary;

   iii.         Identify the relative abundance and diversity of important commercial fish species present in the estuary;

   iv.         Assess the condition factor of the fish species caught within this estuary;

     v.         Examine the relationship between the physico-chemical parameters and phytoplankton abundance;

   vi.         To assess the land-cover trends and change dynamics of the Imo River estuary;

 

1.5  SCOPE OF THE STUDY

The study was undertaken for a period of twelve months to cover the wet and dry season of the year, April 2015 to March 2016 in the Imo River Estuary. The physico-chemical parameters, plankton and fish of the estuary were analysed. An analysis of the land cover of the estuary and its wetlands was also carried out to determine physical changes that might have occurred in the estuary which could affect its integrity. The study is focused on the effect of all these environmental parameters on the present fish catch.

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.

Review


To Comment


Sold By

ProjectShelve

7731

Total Item

Reviews (8)

  • Anonymous

    2 hours ago

    Fast response and reliable

  • Anonymous

    8 hours ago

    Projects would've alot easier if everyone have an idea of excellence work going on here.

  • Anonymous

    1 day ago

    Very good 👍👍

  • Anonymous

    2 days ago

    Honestly, the material is top notch and precise. I love the work and I'll recommend project shelve anyday anytime

  • Anonymous

    2 days ago

    Well and quickly delivered

  • Anonymous

    2 weeks ago

    I am thoroughly impressed with Projectshelve.com! The project material was of outstanding quality, well-researched, and highly detailed. What amazed me most was their instant delivery to both my email and WhatsApp, ensuring I got what I needed immediately. Highly reliable and professional—I'll definitely recommend them to anyone seeking quality project materials!

  • Anonymous

    2 weeks ago

    Its amazing transacting with Projectshelve. They are sincere, got material delivered within few minutes in my email and whatsApp.

  • TJ

    2 months ago

    ProjectShelve is highly reliable. Got the project delivered instantly after payment. Quality of the work.also excellent. Thank you