EVALUATION OF LEGAL INFORMATION SOURCES AND SERVICES IN LAW LIBRARIES OF FEDERAL UNIVERSITIES IN SOUTH-SOUTH, NIGERIA

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00007052

No of Pages: 118

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

$20

ABSTRACT

 

This study evaluated the legal information sources and services in law libraries in federal universities in the South-South, Nigeria. It was guided by eleven objectives, from which eleven research questions and null hypotheses were developed. The design of the study was descriptive survey. The study was carried out in South-South zone of Nigeria. The population of the study was 3564 persons consisting of 133 lecturers, 3431 students and 20 librarians. The sample for the study was 713 persons comprising 133 lecturers, 560 students and 20 librarians. The study adopted a multi-stage sampling technique precisely purposive-proportionate-disproportionate stratified-cluster sampling techniques. A 149-item structured questionnaire titled Legal Information Sources and Services Evaluation Questionnaire (LISSEQ), and a 59-item structured observation checklist titled Online Public Access Catalogue and Observation Checklist (OPACOC) was used for collection of data. Three experts validated the instruments. A coefficient index of 0 .81 and 0 .78 was obtained for LISSEQ and OPACAOC using Pearson Product Moment Correlation Statistics, after a pilot survey was conducted with 30 respondents at the faculty of law library, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, in Anambra State. The researcher, through the help of four (4) research assistants administered 713 copies of the questionnaire to the respondents, 704 copies were retrieved, giving rate of 98.7%. The data collected were analysed using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation and real limit of numbers for answering research question while Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to test the null hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. The study discovered types of legal sources available in law libraries, these include complete set of laws of the Federation of Nigeria (LFN), State laws, Law reports, Government publications, law textbooks, journals etc ,The findings of the study   revealed legal information services available in law libraries, such  include general reference services, Current Awareness Services (CAS), photocopying services, routing of current periodicals, legal research services etc ,The study also found legal information services that were effective to include, current awareness services, selective Dissemination of information, Routing of current periodicals, indexing and abstracting, photocopying services. It was found that legal information sources in the law libraries were current and were adequate. It was recommended that the federal government and other educational stake holders should provide adequate funds; government should make their reports and publications available to law libraries, as well as encourage local publishers to publish law books to reduce cost of acquisition of foreign books; the library management of the various universities should see to it that inter-library loan services are encouraged among law libraries.






TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Title page                                                                                                                                i

Declaration                                                                                                                              ii

Dedication                                                                                                                              iii

Certification                                                                                                                            iv

Acknowledgements                                                                                                                v

Table of Contents                                                                                                                   vi

List of Tables                                                                                                                          viii

Abstract                                                                                                                                  xi

                                                                       

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1              BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY                                                                         1

1.2              STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM                                                                         11

1.3              PURPOSE OF THE STUDY                                                                                                 12

1.4              RESEARCH QUESTIONS                                                                                       14

1.5              HYPOTHESES                                                                                                          15

1.6              SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY                                                                          16

1.7              SCOPE OF THE STUDY                                                                                          17

 

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1       CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK                                                                              19

2.1.1    Law Libraries                                                                                                              19

2.1.2    Legal Information Sources                                                                                         22

2.1.3    Library and Information Services                                                                               23

2.1.4    Types Of Legal Information Sources                                                                         25

2.1.5    Types Of Services In Law Libraries                                                                           28       

2.1.6    Acquisition Of Legal Information Sources In Law Libraries                                     34       

2.1.7    The Need for Evaluation of Library Collection                                                          39

2.1.8    Criteria For Evaluating Legal Information Sources                                                    45

2.1.9    Problems Associated With The Acquisition Of Legal Information

Sources And Services In Law Libraries in Universities                                              49

2.1.10  Strategies to Enhance Legal Information Sources and Services in

Law Libraries                                                                                                              52

2.2       THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK                                                                             56

2.3       REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES                                                                     57

2.4       RESEARCH GAP                                                                                                     63

 

 

CHAPTER  3: METHODOLOGY

3.1       DESIGN OF THE STUDY                                                                                       65

3.2       AREA OF THE STUDY                                                                                           66

3.3       POPULATION OF THE STUDY                                                                             67

3.4       SAMPLE AND SAMPLING TECHNIQUES                                                         67

3.5       INSTRUMENT FOR DATA COLLECTION                                                          69

3.6       VALIDATION OF THE INSTRUMENT                                                                70

3.7       RELIABILITY OF THE INSTRUMENT                                                                71

3.8       METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION                                                                      72

3.9       METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS                                                                           72

 

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1       RESULTS                                                                                                                   76       

4.2       FINDINGS OF THE STUDY                                                                                               99

4.3       DISCUSSION OF THE FINDINGS                                                                                    103

 

CHAPTER  5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

5.1       SUMMARY OF THE STUDY                                                                                  115

5.2       CONCLUSION                                                                                                         118     

5.3       IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS                                                                    120

5.4       RECOMMENDATIONS                                                                                           123

5.5       LIMITATION OF THE STUDY                                                                               124

5.5       SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER STUDIES                                                          124

            REFERENCES                                                                                                          126

            APPENDICES                                                                                                           139

 

 

 



LIST OF TABLES

 

Table 1:           The Mean Responses of Law Lecturers, Librarians and Students on

the Types of Legal Information Sources in Law Libraries in Federal

Universities in South-South, Nigeria.                                                                  76

 

Table 2:           Average Frequency and Percentage of the Booklist in the Libraries in

the Law Libraries in Federal Universities in South-South, Nigeria.                    77

 

Table 3:           Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of the Mean Responses of Law

Lecturers, Librarians and Students on the Types of Legal Information

Sources in Law Libraries in Federal Universities in South-South,

Nigeria                                                                                                                 79

 

Table 4:           The Mean Responses of Law Lecturers, Librarians and Students on the

            Types of Services Being offered in the Law Libraries of the Federal

                        Universities in South-South, Nigeria.                                                                  80

 

Table 5:           Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of the Mean Responses of Law

Lecturers, Librarians and Students on the Types of Services

Being   Rendered in the Law Libraries of the Federal Universities

in South-South, Nigeria.                                                                                      81

 

Table 6:           The Mean Responses of Law Lecturers, Librarians and Students on

the Adequacy of the Legal Information Sources in Law Libraries in

Federal            Universities in South-South, Nigeria.                                                    82

 

Table 7:           Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of the Mean Responses of Law

Lecturers, Librarians and Students on the Adequacy of

the Legal Information Sources in Law Libraries in Federal

Universities in South-South, Nigeria.                                                                   83

 

Table 8:           The Mean Responses of Law Lecturers, Librarians and Students

on the Effectiveness of the Legal Information Services in the Law

Libraries of   Federal Universities in South-South, Nigeria.                               84

 

Table 9:           Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of the Mean Responses of Law

Lecturers, Librarians and Students on the Effectiveness of

the Legal Information Services in the Law Libraries of Federal

Universities in South-South, Nigeria                                                                    85

 

Table 10:         The Mean Responses of Law Lecturers, Librarians and Students

on The Currency of Legal Information Sources in Law Libraries

of Federal Universities in South-South, Nigeria                                                   86

 

Table 11:         Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of the Mean Responses of Law

Lecturers, Librarians and Students on the Currency of the Legal

Information Sources in the Law Libraries of Federal Universities

in South-South, Nigeria                                                                                        87

 

Table 12:         The Mean Responses of Law Lecturers, Librarians and Students on

the Extent the Legal Information Sources are Meeting the Training

Needs of the Law Students of Federal Universities in South-South,

Nigeria.                                                                                                                 88

 

Table 13:         Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of the Mean Responses of Law

Lecturers, Librarians and Students on the Extent the Legal

Information Sources are Meeting the Training Needs of the Law

Students of Federal Universities in South-South, Nigeria                                   89

 

Table 14:         The Mean Responses of Law Lecturers, Librarians and Students on

the Extent the Legal Information Services are Meeting the Training

Needs of the Law Students of Federal Universities in South-South,

Nigeria.                                                                                                                  90

 

Table 15:         Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of the Mean Responses of Law

Lecturers, Librarians and Students on the Extent the Legal

Information Services are Meeting the Training Needs of the Law

Students of Federal Universities in South-South, Nigeria                                   91

 

Table 16:         The Mean Responses of Law Lecturers, Librarians and Students on

The Challenges in Acquisition of Legal Information Sources in the

Law Libraries of Federal Universities in South-South, Nigeria.                        92

 

Table 17:         Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of the Mean Responses of Law

                        Lecturers, Librarians and Students on the Challenges to the

Acquisition of Legal Information Sources in the Law Libraries

of Federal Universities in South-South, Nigeria                                                   93

 

Table 18:         The Mean Responses of Law Lecturers, Librarians and Students on the

                        Challenges in Acquisition of Legal Information Services in the

Law Libraries of Federal Universities in South-South, Nigeria.                          94

 

Table 19:         Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of the Mean Responses of Law

                        Lecturers, Librarians and Students on the Challenges to the

Acquisition of Legal Information Sources in the Law Libraries of

Federal Universities in South-South, Nigeria                                                       95

 

Table 20:         The Mean Responses of Law Lecturers, Librarians and Students on

the Strategies that could be put in Place to Enhance Legal Information

Services in Law Libraries of Federal Universities in South-South, Nigeria        96

 

Table 21:         Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of the Mean Responses of Law

Lecturers, Librarians and Students on the Strategies that could be

put in place to Enhance Legal Information Services in Law Libraries of

Federal Universities in South-South, Nigeria.                                                      97

 

Table 22:         The Mean Responses of Law Lecturers, Librarians and Students on

The Strategies that could be adopted to Enhance Legal Information

Services in Law Libraries of Federal Universities in South-South, Nigeria         98

 

Table 23:         Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of the Mean Responses of Law

Lecturers, Librarians and Students on the Strategies that can

Adopted to Enhance Legal Information Services in Law Libraries

of Federal Universities in South-South, Nigeria.                                                  99

 

 

 

 

 





CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION


1.1              BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

The importance of law libraries to the legal education/profession is ever crucial. Law libraries are primarily tasked with providing legal information sources to judicial officers, legal practitioners, law lecturers and students in academic institutions and other law bodies. Hence the importance of law libraries could be said to be the precursor to the survival of legal profession and education. Thus the law library plays unique and integral role in shaping the quality of the legal system at all levels by virtue of their unique collections and services. These collections contained therein in the law libraries are referred to as the legal information sources.

 

In order to appreciate the concept of “legal information sources”, it will be worthwhile to understand what is meant by the term information. Despite its usage and application in our daily lives, it is a concept that is very difficult to define. This is because it means many things to different people. Ikoja-Odongo and Mostert (2006), indicate that the term information has been defined, understood and interpreted differently across various disciplines, vocations and professions. This view has the support of Olorunfemi (2009) who posits that people interpret the concept of information differently.

 

Mohammed (2011) explains information to mean ideas, skills and experience positively or negatively that enable us to make decision or react to situations immediately or later at an appropriate period of time.  Kariki, in Olorunfemi (2009) was of the view that information is ideas, facts and imaginative works of the mind, data of value, and potentially useful for decision-making and question answering which leads to a state of knowing.

Mohammed further maintained that in whichever way one looks at information, it is presumed that information is organised data, that have potential effect either positively or negatively depending on the way it is managed by an individual, vocation, profession, etc. All professions, vocations, individuals require information for sustenance. Olorunfemi (2009) avers, for example, that judges, lawyers and law students require information in their day-to-day activities. The author maintains that they need information on how to determine the case (judge), argue or represent a client before the law court (lawyers), and how to pass the law examination (law students).

Information is a very important instrument required for day-to-day activities of people in the legal profession. Legal is used here to refer to things that relate to law. All professions, vocations have channels or means of eliciting authoritative information for use. These authoritative means or channels are referred to as source. Hornby (2017) defines source as the person, place or thing from which something (information, goods, etc) comes or is acquired. According to Davarayan and Pulikuuthiel (2011), a source which transmits or embodies information is known as information source.

 

Legal information source comprises of law reports, federal legislations, state laws, foreign law publications, digest treaties, law journals, textbooks, law dictionaries, commonwealth publications, standard documents, government publications, precedent books, electronic legal databases etc. Ejimofor (2001) refers to legal information sources as an embodying, inter-related or structured data used for the practice, teaching and study of law as well as for the conduct of legal research. Serema and Mooko (2002) define legal information sources as materials consulted for aid or for information on a topic, theme, an event, a date, a number, a place or even a word. Legal information is a valuable resource needed in the society of legal practitioners, including the law students that are learning how to become lawyers, Olorunfemi (2004). Legal information sources are classified into primary and secondary sources. Primary sources include all legislative enactments of all legislative houses whether of federal, state or local governments.

 

Moys (2013) however, classified legal information sources into primary and secondary sources. In attempt to explain legal information sources, Moys (2013) classified legal information sources into primary and secondary sources. The author posits that what constitute primary and secondary sources with regards to arrangement of legal information sources varies from one jurisdiction to another. Primary legal information sources refers to legislations or laws that are enacted by the law making body(ies) that have the constitutional powers to make laws Anaeme (2011).

 

Secondary legal information sources on the other hand are not the actual law but interpretation of the law or commentary on the law which include law textbooks such as books on labour law, constitutional law, land law, environmental law, oil and gas, evidence etc. Secondary sources are not direct sources of law rather they only help to explain primary sources of law. When there is conflict between primary and secondary sources the former prevails. These legal information sources are acquired by law libraries.

 

Law library like other special libraries are repositories of legal information sources which have grown over the years, aimed at providing information services to the legal profession both at study and practice level. Law libraries are designed to assist law students, lawyers, judges and those who want to be abreast with the law. Law library is a repository of knowledge, information and wisdom which have accumulated for years. To carry out successful research, academics consult and obtain information from legal information sources in their libraries. Osula (2001) sees the use of the library facilities and materials as the key to research studies. It is in view of this, that Iwhiwhu and Idiedo (2013) affirm that without adequate use of library resources, teaching, learning and research in the university become a problem. It is in realisation of the importance of law libraries to students and faculty members that Ejimofor (2009) explains that lawyers and law students place much value on their libraries for they regard them as their “plant” or tools of trade. Ukpanah and Afolabi (2011) stressing on the importance of law libraries to lawyers and law students, assert that the vast information resources in whatever form in law libraries are of vital importance in tackling the challenges and problems of legal studies and law development, hence the increase in investment by universities and other tertiary educational institutions in Nigeria for the provision of information resources.

The value of information so provided is usually based on the quality of available and accessible information sources which have to be accurate, current and complete in order to satisfy user’s inquiry. In support of this claim, Ukpanah and Afolabi (2011) aver that library does not just make information available, that such information must be relevant to meet the needs of the users. Ademola in Iwhiwhu and Idedo (2013) remark that law students and legal professionals make great use of law textbooks hence, the Nigerian Council of Legal Education requires that every university law library in their collections should have relevant, current and adequate law books and periodicals in their collection as prerequisite for accreditation. Igbeka (1995) affirms that information centres or libraries are the best agents to provide legal information sources and services.

 

The ultimate aim of an information provider such as a law library is to satisfy users’ information needs by providing them with the right information at the right time and through the right means. This, according to Ainoko (2011), is done through series of library activities and services  which include routing of periodicals, current awareness services (CAS), compilation of bibliographies, indexing and abstracting services, selective dissemination of information, noter-up services, reprographic services, etc. The quality of services offered to users is related to the adequacy and currency of legal information sources held in law libraries. These services have not been effectively achieved due to challenges affecting law libraries. (Haruna, 2006)

Challenges, according to Sinclair (2012), are something new and difficult which require great effort and determination to overcome. In a study conducted by Udoh (2003) on the availability of textbooks in academic libraries throughout the country cited in Ukpanah and Afolabi (2011) revealed insufficient textbooks in academic libraries throughout the country. This statement was affirmed by Jegede (1992) that discussion on scarcity of books which goes unabated is a problem that has assumed many dimensions and its negative effect on studying; learning and professional practice is unfathomable.

Lamenting on the deplorable state of the law libraries, Bello in Haruna (2006), remarks that for a long time the stocks of these libraries had not been replenished due, essentially, to lack of funds. It is against this background that Haruna (2006) opines that the economic recession in the country, with its attendant problems of hyper-inflation and foreign exchange rate, seems to have limited the ability of individual lawyers and law libraries to acquire needed information materials for utilization. The study further maintains that the consequences of this ugly situation could be grave for professionalism effectiveness of legal practitioners as it could hinder effective information transfer and in effect slow down the pace of work.

Stressing on the problem affecting law libraries, Enem (2014) records that dearth of information resources has affected effective legal practice and further compounded by lack of professionalism in running some law libraries, and due to the fact that non-professionals are often entrusted with the management of some law libraries, collections of such libraries are often lopsided. Greater percentage of law books/journals needed to promote teaching, learning and research in our institutions of higher learning are foreign prints which are imported from Europe and United States of America. Ogunrombi and Bello (1997) affirm that these materials are in short supply in Nigeria and due to their prohibitive prices, many libraries cannot afford them. This has affected many libraries in acquisition of legal materials.

The current trend in information provision in law libraries in the world today is through the application of information technologies for the provision and expansion of scope of information available to clienteles not minding their locations. Uzoigwe (2004) asserts that while libraries in developed nations have embraced information communication technology in providing library services to their clientele, it is disheartening to note that libraries in Nigeria are still at the crawling stage. The author argued that this could be attributed to dwindling funding of our libraries.  In order to overcome these problems militating against smooth running of our law libraries, it will be necessary to reach out for strategies that could be used to enhance acquisition of legal information sources in our law libraries.

Writing on the strategies to be adopted to improve acquisition of legal information sources, Fakandu and Bayero (2014) opine that efforts should be made by the university authorities to consistently stock the law library with adequate, current, relevant and up-to-date information resources. To achieve this clarion call, Onwudinjo, Nwosu and Ugwu (2014) posit that the law libraries should be adequately funded to enable them purchase the recommended core and other relevant materials, if the vision and mission of establishing faculties of law libraries should be achieved.

Stressing on what to be done to improve services in law libraries, Enem (2014) depicts that recruitment of more experienced, qualified and dedicated staff is necessary for efficiency and productivity. It is against this backdrop that Haruna (2006) affirms that a library may have books and other information materials or even the infrastructure, but if the expertise is not there to unravel the intricacies that ever do often occur in a search for legal information then the claim to usefulness and dispensation of justice will be bizarre and false. The author further recommended that more librarians with background in law and librarianship should be employed for quality services. In a bid to offer efficient services to students and their teachers, Olorunfemi (2015) opine that information and communications technology should be provided in all the faculties of law in the country for them to have access to the latest information in the legal profession which will assist students in conducting effective legal research.

Libraries are known to be inadequately funded, under staffed and yet are expected to meet the users’ needs in this era of globalisation and information explosions (Nwalo and Ogunniyi 2012). It is on this note that Ejedafiru (2010) states that “since no library can effectively satisfy its users  from the resources within its walls; that we are living in a time where a library’s worth is increasingly being measured by the services it offers in terms of helping clients to access universal information rather than its respective collection”. The only option to libraries not being able to provide all the needed resources by users is through library networking.

Library networking is a situation where two or more libraries are engaged in exchange of information through common communication channels usually for purpose of accomplishing shared objectives (Okeagu and Okeagu, 2008).

The increasing amount of investment that universities have been committing to the provision of legal information sources means that universities would be keenly interested in studies that would evaluate the adequacy and currency legal information sources in the law libraries whether they are meeting the information training needs of the law students and the academic lawyers or law lecturers. In a supportive opinion John-Okeke and Ali (2013) are of the opinion that law libraries spend a considerable amount of money for purchasing and supporting online databases, electronic collections, and web-site discovery tools and also spend a considerable amount of staff time building and maintaining subject guides and online learning objects to provide their users with multiple information access points.

It is on this note that Musell (2012) states that given ever narrowing budgetary constraints, it is important for libraries to evaluate which resources are used and how well they are used to better information decision regarding resources allocation. To evaluate, according to Hornby (2017), means to draw a conclusion from examining or assessing something.  Evaluation of library collection is the assessment of the extent to which a collection meets the library’s objective. Evaluation is usually carried out to determine whether the collection is actually meeting its objectives, how well it is serving its users, in which way it is efficient and what remains to be done to develop the collections.

However, Broadus and Fowowe in Ukpanah and Afolabi (2011) are of the view that an evaluation of the availability and utilization of textbooks is a  component of  the planning process that provides academic libraries with feedback to improve total effectiveness in response to the needs and wants of their target users. Evaluation is not only concerned with the appraisal of collections but also with the improvements.

Expressing the need for evaluating library collections, Lumande and Ojedokun (2005) are of the view that collection effectiveness is measured by the extent to which library collections can facilitate activities and how well students can rely on them for projects and assignments. The essence of library evaluation is to ensure that the library is not moribund but dynamic, a core characteristic or requirement for accreditation.

Writing on the importance of library evaluation, Ifidon (1999) avers that the aims of library collection evaluation are meant to determine the scope/depth, usefulness of the collection and to assess the adequacy of the collection and thereby highlighting and suggesting ways to rectify issues discovered. It is on account of this that, Ogunsola and Omoike (2011) highlight that law libraries should evaluate their performances periodically in the light of users’ needs in order to take necessary corrective measures and ensure that the needs of the users groups are met adequately by the services rendered. There is no doubt that through evaluation, the weakness of a library collections are identified and then strengthened. The hallmark of this study is to evaluate the adequacy and currency of legal information sources held in the libraries studied and the types of services being offered to the users.

Apart from this, bearing in mind the importance of legal information sources to the faculty members and students, are the  legal materials held in the law libraries studied up-to-date or obsolete, the usefulness of information sources in meeting the training needs of the users, challenges and strategies for enhancing acquisition of legal information sources. These are regarded as important components of a comprehensive collection development programme. It is through this that the strengths and weaknesses of the law libraries would be determined; this will be a good platform for the law librarians to take necessary action in acquisition of legal materials.

Law Libraries are integral parts of the university libraries. Anyaogu and Mabawonku (2014) aver that globally, universities are recognized as centres of production of knowledge, accumulation and knowledge transfer through research and scholarship. Nirman (2007) posited that the mission of higher education is to advance knowledge, create knowledge, disseminate knowledge through research and provide service to the community. Ochia and Nedosa in Anyaogu and Mabawonku (2014) contended that in universities all over the world, recognition and advancement of individual academic staff, and students’ performance depend largely on the quantity and quality of information bearing materials held in university libraries.

Emphasizing the importance of law libraries to students, Osho (2008) opines that no law faculty can teach all the laws in the classroom, for this purpose, students should thoroughly acquaint themselves with the law library, that the law is only partial in your lecturers’ brains, the whole law is in the law reports, journals and texts which are in abundance in the library. It is as a result of this that, Aname (2010) posits that the law library information content is the engine that runs the legal machine, vibrates and propels the legal system and energises the legal profession. This goes to show that there is nexus between law libraries and legal profession/practice.

 

1.2       STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

The indispensability of law library to the effective practice of laws, teaching and learning has been universally acknowledged (Haruna, 2000). The author reiterates that lawyers and law libraries are like Siamese twins that are inseparable. Scholars such as (Dada 1985, Elias 1956, Ekundayo 1992, Jegede 1994, Oni, 1983 and Williams, 1982) have described law as essentially a library-based subject. The reports of these researchers have strongly held the view that law libraries are not only essential but also crucial to the legal profession. This implies that the performance of law students in examinations and outside schools may be directly proportional to the information sources available and accessible to the students in the university.

Again to the law lecturers, it is absolutely an impossible task for them to perform their duty of lecturing students without having access to well-stocked law library. The dynamic nature of legal profession and as a course is such that law lecturers must avail themselves the opportunities of using well-stocked resourceful library, in order to refresh, and get abreast with modern trends in their areas of teaching. This is they do by consulting the various law reports that are published weekly and monthly. These publications will provide law lecturers in-depth idea of various reviews and judicial precedents that churned is out constantly from various decisions and pronouncements of courts of superior records. Any lecturer who does not avail himself or herself the opportunity of reading these legal resources in law library stands the risk of impacting poor and out-dated knowledge to students.  

The primary objective of the collections of any Faculty law library is directed towards serving the research, learning and teaching needs of the faculty. For a Faculty of law library that intends to be relevant to achieve this, its collections must be adequate both in quality and quantity. The quantity should be such that the library users should not have to struggle before they can have the books to use.

The quality of services offered to users is related to the adequacy and currency of legal information sources held in law libraries. These information sources and services need evaluation from time to time. However, studies have shown that similar research had been carried in South East Nigeria by Enem. But, so far no empirical studies to the best of the knowledge of the researcher have been undertaken to identify the sources and services in the South-South, Nigeria. The adequacy of sources, effectiveness of legal information services rendered has not been determined. The currency of sources are not empirically determined nor have there been any studies to show, at least, again, empirically, that sources and services are meeting the training needs of clients expected to be served. All these need a detailed study to evaluate them in a critical empirical study.

All these are at the centre of critical issue that this present study seeks to explore, hence the problem of this study.

 

1.3       PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the legal information sources and services in law libraries in federal universities in the South-South, Nigeria. The specific objectives were to:

1.      find out the types of legal information sources available in the law libraries in the federal universities in South-South, Nigeria,

2.      investigate the types of services that the law libraries offer to the clienteles in federal universities in South-South, Nigeria,

3.      ascertain the adequacy of legal information sources of the law libraries in the federal universities in South-South, Nigeria ,

4.      determine the effectiveness of legal information services offered in the law libraries in the federal universities in South-South, Nigeria,

5.      ascertain the currency of legal information sources in the law libraries of the federal universities in South-South, Nigeria,

6.      examine the extent to which legal information sources of the law libraries are meeting the training needs of the users in federal universities in South-South, Nigeria,

7.      examine the extent to which legal information services of the law libraries are meeting the training needs of the users in federal universities in South-South, Nigeria,

8.      identify challenges associated with acquisition of legal information sources in law libraries of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria and,

9.      identify challenges associated with the provision of legal information services in law libraries of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria,

10.  Suggest strategies for enhancing libraries acquisition of legal information sources in law libraries of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria and,

11.  Suggest strategies for enhancing libraries’ legal information services in law libraries of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria.

 

1.4       RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The study provided answers to the following research questions.

1.      What are the types of legal information sources available in law libraries in the federal universities in South-South, Nigeria? s

2.      What are the types of services offered rendered in the law libraries of the federal universities in South-South, Nigeria?

3.      What is the adequacy of the legal information sources in the law libraries of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria in terms of quantity and quality?

4.      What is the effectiveness of legal information services rendered in the law libraries of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria?

5.      What is the currency of legal information sources in law libraries of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria?

6.      To what extent are the legal information sources meeting the training needs of the law students of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria?

7.      To what extent are the legal information services meeting the training needs of the law students of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria?

8.      What are challenges in acquisition of legal information sources in the law libraries of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria?

9.      What are the challenges in the provision legal information services in the law libraries of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria?

10.  What are the strategies that could be put in place to enhance acquisition of legal information sources in law libraries of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria?

11.  What are the strategies that could be put in place to enhance legal information services in law libraries of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria?

 

1.5       HYPOTHESES

The following null hypotheses derived from the research questions guided the study and were tested at 0.05 level of significance.

1.      There is no significant difference in the mean responses of law lecturers, students and librarians among the universities on the types of legal information sources available in law libraries in the federal universities in South-South, Nigeria.

2.      There is no significant difference in the mean responses of law lecturers, students and librarians among the universities on the types of services being offered in the law libraries of the federal universities in South-South, Nigeria

3.      There is no significant difference in the mean responses of law lecturers, students and librarians among the universities on the adequacy of the legal information sources in the law libraries of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria

4.      There is no significant difference in the mean responses of law lecturers, students and librarians among the universities on the effectiveness of legal information services offered in the law libraries of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria

5.      There is no significant difference in the mean responses of law lecturers, students and librarians among the universities on the currency of legal information sources in law libraries of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria

6.      There is no significant difference in the mean responses of law lecturers, students and librarians among the universities on the extent the legal information sources meeting the training needs of the law students of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria

7.      There is no significant difference in the mean responses of law lecturers, students and librarians among the universities on the extent the legal information services meeting the training needs of the law students of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria

8.      There is no significant difference in the mean responses of law lecturers, students and librarians among the universities on the challenges in acquisition of legal information sources in the law libraries of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria

9.      There is no significant difference in the mean responses of law lecturers, students and librarians among the universities on the challenges of legal information services in the law libraries of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria

10.  There is no significant difference in the mean responses of law lecturers, students and librarians among the universities on the strategies that could be put in place to enhance acquisition of legal information sources in law libraries of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria

11.  There is no significant difference in the mean responses of law lecturers, students and librarians among the universities on the strategies that could be put in place to enhance legal information services in law libraries of federal universities in South-South, Nigeria

 

1.6       SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

It is expected that the findings of this study would be useful to the following: law librarians, law lecturers, students, scholars, library management. In addition to these, the findings would reach potential beneficiaries through seminar presentations, conferences, workshops, television and radio talk shows, articles in scholarly journals.

 

It is also expected that the result of this study would make law librarians in the faculties of law libraries in South-South, Nigeria, aware of their responsibilities which include provision of legal information sources to law lecturers and students. Librarians would realize where they need to re-adjust and where to improve upon, especially getting re-skilled, and acquiring the professional competencies required so that they situate themselves to become and remain relevant in the information global age.

 

In addition to the above, the findings of this study would be of benefit to the law lecturers as it would act as a catalyst to the provision of facilities, acquisition of current legal information sources, improved services that are appropriate to support teaching, learning and research. Scholars would benefit from this through current information research findings on law libraries emanating from conferences, seminars, etc. Significant contribution would be made to researchers on the body of literature which would serve as reference materials for further research work. A researcher would find some aspect of the study useful and relevant to the literature review when researching on similar study.

The result of this study would be significant to university library management as documentary resource in planning, organizing directing, and controlling their duties and other technical aspects of managing a law library.

 

1.7       SCOPE OF THE STUDY

The study covered evaluation of legal information sources and services in law libraries in federal universities in the South-South namely; University of Benin, University of Port Harcourt, University of Uyo and University of Calabar. This study was limited to evaluation of currency of legal information sources, adequacy, services, challenges, and strategies to enhance acquisition of legal information sources and effective services delivery in the law libraries of Federal Universities in South-South, Nigeria.

 


Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment