EFFECT OF HEDGE ACCOUNTING ON THE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF LISTED DEPOSIT MONEY BANKS IN NIGERIA

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00007552

No of Pages: 123

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

$20

ABSTRACT

The study examined the effect of hedge accounting on the financial performance of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria. The specific objectives of the study were; to examine the effect of hedge accounting (derivative asset and derivative liability) on the return on asset of listed commercial banks in Nigeria, to determine the effect of hedge accounting (derivative asset and derivative liability) on the return on equity of listed commercial banks in Nigeria, to examine the effect of hedge accounting (derivative asset and derivative liability) on earnings per share of listed commercial banks in Nigeria and to ascertain the effect of hedge accounting (derivative asset and derivative liability) on profit after tax of listed commercial banks in Nigeria. To achieve the objectives of the study the ex-post facto research design was adopted. For this study, secondary data was used through the use of annual reports and accounts of the selected commercial banks. The population of the study was made up of 14 listed commercial banks as at December 2020 while the sample size was 10 selected banks. Data was analyzed using panel data regression analysis. The finding revealed that (i) Hedge accounting (derivative asset and derivative liability) has no significant effect on the return on asset of listed commercial banks in Nigeria, (ii) Hedge accounting (derivative asset and derivative liability) has a significant effect on the return on equity of listed commercial banks in Nigeria(iii)Hedge accounting (derivative asset and derivative liability) has no significant effect on earnings per share of listed commercial banks in Nigeriaand (iv)Hedge accounting (derivative asset and derivative liability) has a significant effect on profit after tax of listed commercial banks in Nigeria. Based on the findings, the study recommended that banks should improve on accounting for hedging through derivative by fully adopting the prescription made by IFRS 7 and 9, this will give confidence to intending investors and in turn increase the return on asset of banks in Nigeria. Also, more funds should be committed to the use of derivatives for hedging against interest rate fluctuations that possibly affects the earnings of the banks.

 





TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page                                                                                                                                i

Declaration page                                                                                                                     ii

Certification                                                                                                                            iii

Dedication                                                                                                                              iv

Acknowledgement                                                                                                                  v

Table of content                                                                                                                      vi

Abstract                                                                                                                                   x

 

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background to the Study                                                                                      1

1.2 Statement of the Problem                                                                                                          4

1.3 Objectives of the Study                                                                                         6

1.4 Research Questions                                                                                               7

1.5 Research Hypotheses                                                                                            7

1.6 Significance of the Study                                                                                      8

1.7 Scope of the Study                                                                                                9

1.8  Limitations of the Study                                                                                             9

1.9  Operational Definition of Terms                                                                                9

CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1 Conceptual Framework                                                                                         11

2.1.1 Concept of hedging                                                                                            11

2.1.2 Benefits of hedge accounting                                                                             13

2.1.3 Hedging techniques                                                                                            15

2.1.4 Hedging strategies                                                                                              18

2.1.5 Concept of derivative accounting                                                                                  19

2.1.5.1 Uses of derivatives                                                                                          25

2.1.6      Dealing with problems of derivatives valuation                                                         31

2.1.7      Accounting of derivatives                                                                                          32

2.1.7.1  Accounting for derivative under SFAS (161)                                                            32

2.1.7.2  Accounting for derivatives under IFRS 9                                                                   34

2.1.8 Concept of firm performance                                                                             37

2.1.9 The relationship between hedging strategies and financial performance of firms 38

2.1.10 Determinants of firm performance                                                                          39

2.2 Theoretical Framework                                                                                                 40

2.2.1 Optimal hedging theory                                                                                                 41

2.2.2 Manager’s personal utility maximization theory.                                                          41

2.2.3 The purchasing power parity theory                                                                  42

2.2.4 The international fisher effect                                                                            42

2.3 Empirical Review                                                                                                 43

2.4 Summary of Literature Review                                                                            61

2.5 Gap in Literature                                                                                                   62

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY

3.1 Research Design                                                                                                               63

3.2 Area of the Study                                                                                                              63

3.3  Population of the Study                                                                                       63

3.4 Sample and Sample Size Determination                                                              63

3.5 Method of data Collection and Data Sources                                                       64

3.6 Data analysis Technique                                                                                       64

3.7 Model Specification                                                                                                         65

3.8 Description of the Variables of the Study:                                                                       65

CHAPTER 4: DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS

4.1 Data Presentation                                                                                                  67

4.2 Pre-estimation Tests                                                                                              67

4.2.1 Stationarity/ unit root tests                                                                                 67

4.2.2 Cointegration test results                                                                                   68

4.3 Data Analysis                                                                                                        72

4.3.1 Hausman test for hypothesis one                                                                       72

4.3.2 Panel data test                                                                                                    73

4.3.3 Hausman test for hypothesis two                                                                       74

4.3.4 Data analysis for hypothesis two                                                                       75

4.3.5 Hausman test for hypothesis three                                                                     76

4.3.7 Data analysis for hypothesis three                                                                     77

4.3.5 Hausman test for hypothesis four                                                                      79

4.3.7 Data analysis for hypothesis four                                                                       80

4.4 Discussion on Results                                                                                           81

CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Summary of Findings                                                                                                       84

5.2 Conclusion                                                                                                                        84

5.3 Recommendations                                                                                                            85

5.4  Contribution to Knowledge                                                                                        86

5.5 Area of Further Research                                                                                                             86     

            References                                                                                                                   87

            Appendices                                                                                                                 98







LIST OF TABLES


4.1. Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) Test                                                                67

4.2: Table for co-integration test                                                                                68

4.3 Descriptive statistics                                                                                             69

 

4.4: Hausman result for hypothesis one                                                                      72

 

4.5: Regression Result for hypothesis one                                                                  73

4.6: Hausman result for hypothesis two                                                                      74

 

4.7: Regression Result for hypothesis two                                                                  75

 

4.8: Hausman result for hypothesis three                                                                   76

 

4.9: Regression Result for hypothesis three                                                               77

 

4.10: Hausman result for hypothesis four                                                                   79

4.11: Regression Result for hypothesis four                                                                           80

 


 


CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION


1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY

Risk management is an important component of financial management of organizations especially those involved in international trade because of their exposure to foreign currency price fluctuations. This follows high volatility in the foreign exchange market thereby creating uncertainty. The inherent forex risks lead to adverse exchange rates fluctuations that may result into organizational losses where foreign currencies are involved. Barney (2001) opines that forex risks are risks that are attributed to unexpected exchange rates changes and overall foreign exchange exposure. Companies are exposed to this risk if their project results actually depend on future exchange rates especially where future exchange rate changes are difficult to anticipate. Forex risk management entails adopting assessment programs that are meant to readily identify as well as quantify forex risks so as to counteract and mitigate the identified forex risks hence salvaging economic value of firms (Giddy, 2010).

Financial risk management has therefore become one of the most important business strategies of firms. Firms that do not adapt financial risk management strategies are likely to witness poor growth patterns compared to those that adapt financial risk management strategies. There exist several financial risk management strategies that may be used to reduce the financial risks such as portfolio diversification for diversifiable risks and hedging practices for non-diversifiable risks. (Sharpe, Alexander & Bailey, 2013)

The operating environment for businesses has become very volatile following increased globalization and internationalization of firms. Together with this, the business environment in Nigeria has witnessed high variation in the foreign exchange rate over the recent past as the Nigeria Naira depreciates against the widely used United States Dollar. Since majority of the firms either source their inputs or sale their output internationally, they have been affected by the fluctuation in exchange rates calling on them to implement necessary measures to manage the foreign exchange risk.  Therefore, the need for entities or investors to consider hedging activities arises in order to minimize the damage caused by the risks for the entities and investors. Firms employ the use of derivative financial instruments to hedge exposure to various risks. In the corporate world, the economic environments that business organizations operate in have over time grown more complex (Mbungu, 2013).

Hedging has conventionally been defined as a tactic for reducing the risk in upholding a market position while speculation refers to taking a position in the way the markets would shift. Nowadays, hedging and speculation strategies, together with derivatives, are versatile tools or methods that enable companies to administer risk more efficiently. A range of hedging techniques is accessible for managing currency risk. These methods may be classified under two clusters: internal techniques are those that are meant at reducing or averting an exposed position from occurring and external techniques are usually contractual measures expected to minimize exchange losses that may arise from an existing exposure (Giddy & Dufey, 2012).

Hedging is one of the risk mitigating strategies that is commonly used by firms. Hedging reduces the risk of future price movements which might affect a firm adversely if not well managed (Horne & Wachowicz, 2012). Hedging is done by a firm or individual to protect against a price change that would otherwise negatively affect profits (Brigham & Ehrhardt, 2014). It provides relatively inexpensive and highly liquid positions similar to those obtained with diversified stock portfolios (Sharpe, Alexander & Bailey, 2013). To hedge a firm can use a wide range of financial instruments, including forward agreements, futures contracts, options or swaps, to achieve their hedging goals. Bartram, Brown & Conrad (2011) on a survey of firms from 47 countries found out that the use of these instruments reduced firm’s total risk and is more experienced in firms with higher exposures to interest rate risks, exchange rate risks and commodity prices risks. In United States, 83% of hedging firms use forward agreements, futures contracts, options or swaps to hedge foreign exchange risk, 76% use them to hedge interest rate risk and 56% use them to hedge commodity price risk (Bodnar & Wong, 2000). Therefore it follows that forward agreements, futures contracts, options and swaps are commonly used in hedging interest rate risks, foreign exchange risks, and commodity price risks. 

The choice of exchange risk hedging techniques can be influenced by a number of factors, namely; size, amount of research and development expenditure, exposure to exchange rates through foreign sales and foreign trade, liquidity of the firm, ownership structure among others (Allayanis & Ofek, 2001). Large companies are expected to have significant exposure to foreign exchange risk and it is believed that companies aggressively manage the risk (Bodnar& Wong, 2000). Smith and Stulz (2005) found that larger firms that are dependent on export revenue have lower exposure to exchange rate risk. 

Financial performance refers to the extent to which financial objectives of a firm are being met. Different methods, including stock market based and accounting based ones, are used to measure financial performance. Return on total assets (ROA) is the widely used accounting measure. It indicates the management’s ability to convert assets into net earnings. The higher the ROA the better the performance. There are other measures of financial performance which includes profit margin, return on equity, dividend per share and earnings per share among others (Li, Visaltanachoti & Luo 2014).

Exchange rate fluctuations affect the value of firms differently from the share prices and return on investments by shareholders (Gutierrez, 2013). Movement in general exchange rate affects the reporting of financial statements for firms operating in multiple markets as they convert one currency transactions into another for the purpose of financial statement preparation. However, in order to minimize the effect of general changes in foreign currency prices, companies cushion themselves through adoption of several mechanisms. These actions are aimed at minimizing the exposure thus improving the overall financial returns on investment. 

Rutagi (2017), established that changes in the cost of different currencies directly affect the prevailing prices of commodities on the domestic market hence the overall firm profitability. It also affects the volume of goods transacted as it influences the purchasing power of consumers. According to a study conducted by Gachua (2011), foreign exchange rate exposure affects the overall financial returns recorded by organizations. These risks arise whenever an organization has cash obligations and assets to be collected in future (Mweni, 2014).Mbire and Atingi, (2017) stated that most of the international firms utilize various hedging or arbitrage strategies to stabilize financial earnings or firm value especially when there are obvious inconsistencies in global exchange movements. Management of risk effectively leads to profitability of businesses (Mweni, 2014). Firms often make use of a micro hedging strategy to manage their interest rate risk exposure of a portfolio financial assets and liabilities. Hence the need to study the effect of hedge accounting on financial performance of listed commercial banks becomes necessary.

 

1.2 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

There is no country that is self-reliant as it has to import and export some products. Vong and Hoi (2009) assert that firms engaged in business across national boundaries are exposed to risks arising from general changes in the cost of different currencies because of its effect on the payables and receivables denominated in foreign currencies. In order to cover their exposure, firms apply different instruments like SWAPs, forwards, options, and holding foreign currency denominated rates among others. 

Commercial banks listed at the Nigeria Stock Exchange have faced various forex challenges following unstable exchange rates which saw the Kenyan currency depreciate against major currencies. Unstable forex saw some of the firms record huge losses as they imported some of their inputs and exported some of their outputs. This meant that in order to protect their exposure, they needed to implement various forex exposure management strategies. 

In late 2008, international markets were grossly affected by a sharp and unexpected spike in foreign exchange instability. The global financial crisis caused many firms to revert to existing risk management strategies or formulate new ones. The use of foreign currency derivatives was being reassessed by companies trying to efficiently manage the exaggerated raise in currency risk associated to the global financial crisis (Kirschner, 2009).   The Nigeria security market in regard to spurring new financial innovations remains relatively poor despite being regarded as one of the best in Africa (Mwangi, 2001) The Nigeria economy is becoming more and more open with international trading constantly increasing and as a result Nigeria firms become more exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations. The relative price changes affect the firms’ competitive market position, leading to changes in cash flows and ultimately, in firms performance (Noor & Abdalla, 2014).

Various studies on hedge accounting and firm performance have reported mixed findings. On international level, Ahmed, Azevedo and Guney (2014) looked at how the value of firms was affected by different hedging strategies using non-financial firms from the UK. According to another study conducted by Ahmed, Azevedo and Guney (2014) application of hedge accounting help financial institutions manage their position and hence improve overall financial results. The study was conducted among commercial banks with mixing results. Mbungu (2013) established that foreign exchange risk management promoted better overall financial results of exporting firms because it enables them improve on financial results. 

Further, Gachua (2011) examined how a firm’s exposure to changes in prices of foreign currency affect an organization’s overall financial results using a case of listed companies.  The finding showed that firms were negatively affected by changes in the foreign currency prices. Makau (2008) examined the responsiveness of Kenya’s financial institutions securities to the changes in the cost of lending and cost of foreign currency over a period of ten years (2001-2010). Elahi and Dehashti (2011) surveyed how fluctuations in currency prices affect tea exports using the case of smallholders’ tea factories in Nigeria and established that it led to uncertainty in the general earnings.  

From the above review, the existing studies were either done in other economies which limit their application in Nigeria. To fill in the existing gap, this study was carried out in the banking sector. It is against this backdrop that this study intends to examine the effect of hedge accounting on the financial performance of listed commercial banks in Nigeria.


1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

The main objective of the study is to examine the effect ofhedge accounting on the financial performance of listed commercial banks in Nigeria. Other specific objectives include:

(i)             To examine the effect of hedge accounting on the return on asset of listed commercial banks in Nigeria.

(ii)           To determine the effect of hedge accounting on the return on equity of listed commercial banks in Nigeria.

(iii)          To examine the effect of hedge accounting on earnings per share of listed commercial banks in Nigeria.

(iv)          To ascertain the effect of hedge accounting on profit after tax of listed commercial banks in Nigeria.


1.4 RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The following questions guided the study

(i)             What is the effect of hedge accounting on the return on asset of listed commercial banks in Nigeria?

(ii)           What is the effect of hedge accounting on the return on equity of listed commercial banks in Nigeria?

(iii)          What is the effect of hedge accounting on earnings per share of listed commercial banks in Nigeria?

(iv)          How does hedge accounting affect profit after tax of listed commercial banks in Nigeria?


1.5 RESEARCH HYPOTHESES

For the purpose of the study, the following stated null hypotheses were tested.

H01: Hedge accounting has no significant effect on the return on asset of listed commercial banks in Nigeria.

H02: Hedge accounting has no significant effect on the return on equity of listed commercial banks in Nigeria.

H03: Hedge accounting has no significant effect on the earnings per share of listed commercial banks in Nigeria.

H04: Hedge accounting has no significant effect on profit after tax of listed commercial banks in Nigeria.


1.6 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

This study would be of significance to managers in organizations, scholars and investors.

To managers in corporate organizations, the findings would be important in informing their foreign exchange risk management strategies because they would be in a position to link the strategies to the exposure of fluctuations in the general prices of foreign currency of the firms especially multinational corporations and those firms involved in international trade. By applying the findings, managers would be in a better position to anticipate and plan corrective measures when faced with foreign exchange risk exposure. The findings will also enlighten managers on the effect of hedge accounting on financial performance of firms especially those listed in Nigeria stock exchange.

The findings of this study will be significance to investors. Investors need to know the performance level of every firm before making investment decision. Risk exposure is one of the major factors that hinder firms’ performance. Hence, application of hedge accounting helps to mitigate against these risks. The study will enlighten investors on the importance of hedge accounting as well as its application in corporate organization. Such will give investors’ confidence to invest in a particular firm.

To scholars and academicians, the study would add to the existing literature on foreign exchange risk hedging strategies and its application. This would broaden their comprehension of the theories on the subject of foreign exchange risk hedging besides suggesting areas for further research.  Consequently, the study will serve as a reference material to scholars who would want to carry out a similar topic in future.

 

1.7 SCOPE OF THE STUDY

The study investigated the effect of hedge accounting on the financial performance of listed commercial banks in Nigeria for the period of ten years ranging from 2011to 2020. The period is used because of the recent fluctuation in exchange market which can lead to bank failures. With hedge accounting, such risk can be managed.


1.10        LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

Although this study is scientifically carried out, there are potential limitations of the study that should be taken into consideration. The current research is restricted only to the listed deposit money banks. Furthermore, this research is conducted based on secondary data collection. The other data collection method such as survey is not considered. As a result the data collected is not 100% accurate as it only captured quantifiable data neglecting the expression and views of firm managers on how they use hedging strategies other than derivatives to improve the value of the banks. In addition to these, data representing the period of 2011 to 2020 is used for the study. Thus, current issues and causation cannot be inferred.


1.11        OPERATIONAL DEFINITION OF TERMS

Hedge accounting: This is a special accounting treatment that enables a company to dampen earnings volatility resulting from mark-to-market accounting.

Derivative asset: This represents the reported figure of derivative asset in the financial statement of the banks. The figure reported represents the computation of derivative instrument classified as assets by the banks in line with IFRS 9 in a given year.

Derivative liability: This represents the reported derivative liability in the financial statement of the banks. The figure reported represents the computation of derivative instrument classified as liability by the banks in line with IFRS 9 in a given year.

Performance: Performance is completion of a task with application of knowledge, skills and abilities. In work place, performance or job performance means good ranking with the hypothesized conception of requirements of a task role, whereas citizenship performance means a set of individual activity/contribution that supports the organizational culture.

Earnings per share: This variable is used to measure the market value of the banks. It is derived from the net income after the income statement has been prepared.  Earnings per share are calculated by dividing the net profit or loss of the period attributable to shareholders by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding. In this study it is gotten by taking the figures of the banks reported earnings per share in their financial statement that represents the proportion of total income to total outstanding shares of the firm at a time.

Net profit margin: This is the percentage of revenue left after all expenses have been deducted from sales.  The measurement reveals the amount of profit that a business can extract from its total sales. The net sales part of the equation is gross sales minus all sales deductions, such as sales allowances. The formula is: (Net profits ÷ Net sales) x 100 = Net profit margin.

Return on asset: Return on Assets (ROA) is an indicator of how profitable a company is relative to its total assets. ROA gives an idea as to how efficient management is at using its assets to generate earnings. Calculated by dividing a company's annual earnings by its total assets, ROA is displayed as a percentage.

Return on equity: Return on equity (ROE) is the amount of net income returned as a percentage of shareholders equity. Return on equity measures a corporation's profitability by revealing how much profit a company generates with the money shareholders have invested.


Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment