CHARACTERIZATION AND ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITIES OF LACTIC ACID BACTERIA ISOLATED FROM SOME FERMENTED FOODS

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00007172

No of Pages: 86

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

$20

ABSTRACT


This study was aimed at establishing the antimicrobial activity of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) on some food spoilage and pathogenic organisms. Serial dilutions of fermented maize and sorghum samples were performed and 0.1ml of the appropriate dilutions were inoculated on de Man Rogosa Sharpe medium for the isolation of lactic acid bacteria. Lactococcus and Lactobacillus species were isolated, identified and characterized. The test organisms were confirmed by biochemical tests to be Pseudomonas sp., Escherichia coliSerratia marcescensBacillus sp. and Staphylococcus sp. The two LAB isolates were further confirmed molecularly to be Lactococcus specie 104.6 and Lactobacillus fermentum strain SN5. Using the agar well diffusion method, the two isolates inhibited the growth of all the test organisms except Pseudomonas aeruginosa which showed no zone of inhibition. The inhibitory activity of Lactococcus sp. 104.6 was the highest, 12.7±2.31 mm on S. marcescens, 11±1.00 mm on Staphylococcus sp. 9.6±1.52 mm on E. coli with the least inhibitory activity 8.3±1.52 mm on Bacillus sp. The highest inhibitory activity of Lactobacillus fermentum was also observed as 17.0±1.00mm on S. marcescens, followed by 14.3±1.15 mm on E. coli, 9.0±1.73 mm on Bacillus sp. with the least inhibitory activity 11±1.00mm on Staphylococcus sp. The co-culturing of lactic acid bacteria and test organisms indicated gradual reduction in the number of test organisms during the period of monitoring. The GC-MS analysis of Lactobacillus fermentum showed five volatile organic acids namely, acetic acid, propionic acid, isobutyric, butyric acid and isovaleric acid. The results of this study suggest that Lactococcus species and Lactobacillus fermentum can be used as biopreservatives in food industries rather than the synthetic chemical preservatives which is commonly used.





TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page

i

Declaration

ii

Certification

iii

Dedication

iv

Acknowledgements

v

Table of Contents

vi

List of Tables

x

List of Figures

xi

List of Plate

xii

Abstract

xiii

 

 

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

 

1.1       Background of the Study

1

1.2       Problem Statement

2

1.3       Justification

3

1.4       General Objective

3

1.4.1    Specific Objectives

3

 

 

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW

 

 

2.1       Lactic Acid Bacteria

4

2.2       Lactic Acid Bacteria and Food Fermentation

5

2.3       Inhibition of Foodborne Pathogens by Lactic Acid Bacteria

6

2.3.1.   Organic acids

7

2.3.2.   Diacetyl

8

2.3.3    Hydrogen peroxide

9

2.3.4    Carbon dioxide

9

2.3.5    Reuterin

10

2.3.6    Bacteriocin

10

2.4       Lactic Acid Bacteria as Biopreservatives

12

2.5       Application of LAB as Biopreservatives

13

2.5.1    Starter cultures for fermented foods

13

2.5.2    Adjunct cultures

13

2.5.3    Bio-protective cultures

14

2.5.3    Probiotic cultures

15

2.6       Food Spoilage Organisms and Pathogens

16

2.6.1    Pseudomonas species

16

2.6.2    Serratia marcescens

17

2.6.3    Escherichia coli

18

2.6.4    Staphylococcus aureus

19

2.6.5    Bacillus cereus

20

CHAPTER 3: MATERIALS AND METHOD

 

3.1       Sample Collection

21

3.2       Collection of Test Organisms

21

3.3       Isolation and Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria

21

3.3.1    Isolation of the lactic acid bacteria

21

3.3.2    Characterization of the Isolates

22

3.4       Antimicrobial Activity of the Isolates

23

3.4.1    Antimicrobial activity of isolates using agar well diffusion method

23

3.4.2    Antimicrobial assay using the co-culturing method

23

3.5       Molecular Identification of Isolates

24

3.5.1    DNA extraction

24

3.5.2    16s rRNA amplification

24

3.5.3    Sequencing

25

3.6       Analysis for the Volatile Organic Acids Produced by the Isolates

25

3.7       Statistical Analysis

25

 

 

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

 

4.1       Results

26

4.1.1    Identification of isolates by biochemical tests

26

4.1.2    Growth characteristics of the bacterial isolates at various temperatures,             pH and salt concentrations

 

28

4.1.3    Antimicrobial activity of the lab isolates using agar well diffusion             method

 

30

4.1.4    Antimicrobial activity of the LAB isolates in co-culture with             Staphylococcus specie at 37°C

 

32

4.1.5 Antimicrobial activity of the LAB isolates in co-culture with Pseudomonas             specie at 37°C

 

34

4.1.6 Antimicrobial activity of the LAB isolates in co-culture with Serratia             marcescens at 37°C

 

36

4.1.7 Antimicrobial activity of the LAB isolates in co-culture with Escherichia             coli, at 37°C

 

38

4.1.8 Antimicrobial Activity of the LAB Isolates in Co-culture with Bacillus             specie at 37°C

 

40

4.1.9 Changes in the titrable acidity of the medium during separate culturing             and co-culturing of the LAB isolates and staphylococcus specie at 37°C

 

42

4.1.10 Changes in the titrable acidity of the medium during separate culturing             and co-culturing of the LAB and Pseudomonas specie at 37°C.

 

44

4.1.11 Changes in the titrable Acidity of the Medium During Separate Culturing             and Co-Culturing of the LAB and Serratia marcescens at 37°C

 

46

4.1.12 Changes in the titrable acidity of the medium during separate culturing             and co-culturing of the LAB and Escherichia coli at 37°C

 

48

4.1.13 Changes in the titrable acidity of the medium during separate culturing             and co-culturing of the LAB and Bacillus specie at 37°C.

 

50

4.1.14 Agarose Gel electrophoresis of the 16S rRNA gene of the isolates

52

4.1.15 Gas chromatogram- mass spectrophotometer analysis for the volatile             organic acids produced by the isolates

 

56

4.2       Discussion

58

4.2.1    Identification and characterization of isolates

58

4.2.2    Antimicrobial activity of the LAB isolates

58

4.2.3 Molecular identification of the LAB isolates

61

4.2.3    Gas chromatogram of volatile organic acids produced by Lactococcus             specie 104.6

61

 

 

CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 

5.1 Conclusion

62

5.2 Recommendation

62

      References

63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIST OF TABLES

 

 

Page

4.1

Biochemical Test Identification of Isolates

27

4.2

Growth characteristics of the bacterial isolates at various temperatures, pH and salt concentrations

29

4.3

Mean diameter zone of inhibition (mm) produced by the LAB isolates against different test organisms

31

4.4

Identification of the isolates By 16SRNA  sequencing

54

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIST OF FIGURES

 

 

Page

4.1

Survival of Staphylococcus sp, Lactococcus sp. 104.6 and Lactobacillus fermentum during separate culturing and culturing in a mixed population at 37°C

 

 

33

4.2

Survival of Pseudomonas sp, Lactococcus sp. 104.6 and Lactobacillus fermentum during separate culturing and culturing in a mixed population at 37°C

 

 

35

4.3

Survival of Serratia marcescens, Lactococcus sp. and L. fermentum during separate culturing and culturing in a mixed population at 37°C.

 

37

4.4

Survival of Escherichia coli, Lactococcus sp. and Lactobacillus fermentum during separate culturing and culturing in a mixed population at 37°C.

 

 

39

4.5

Survival Bacillus sp., Lactococcus sp. and L. fermentum during separate culturing and culturing in a mixed population at 37°C          

 

41

4.6

Changes in the titrable acidity of the medium during separate culturing and co-culturing of the Lactococcus sp. 104.6, L. fermentum and Staphylococcus sp. at 37°C

 

 

43

4.7

Changes in the titratable acidity of the medium during separate culturing and co-culturing of the Lactococcus sp., L. fermentum and Pseudomonas sp at 37˚C

 

 

45

4.8

Changes in the titratable acidity of the medium during separate culturing and co-culturing of Lactococcus sp., L. fermentum and Serratia marscesens at 37°C

 

 

47

4.9

Changes in the titrable acidity of the medium during separate culturing and co-culturing of Lactococcus sp 104.6, L. fermentum and E. coli at 37°C

 

 

49

4.10

Changes in the titrable acidity of the medium during separate culturing and co-culturing of Lactococcus sp., L. fermentum and Bacillus sp. at 37°C

 

 

51

4.11

Gas Chromatogram of Volatile Organic acids produced by Lactococcus specie 104.6

57

 








LIST OF PLATE

 

 

Page

4.1

Agarose gel electrophoresis of the 16S rRNA gene of the Lactococcus specie 104.6 (Lane A), Lactobacillus fermentum strain SN_5 (Lane C). Lane N represents the 100 bp molecular ladder

 

53

 

 


 

 

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION


1.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION

In Africa, majority of the foods consumed are fermented. The fermentation of such foods is usually carried out by few groups of bacteria and yeasts. The lactic acid bacteria are involved in fermentation of many African foods and beverages (Wassie and Wassie, 2016). Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are a group of Gram positive, non-spore forming, anaerobic or facultative aerobic cocci or rods, which produce lactic acid as one of their major fermentation products of the carbohydrates metabolism (Hayek and Ibrahim, 2013). LAB through their fermentative ability enhances the shelf life of the fermented product (Sharma et al., 2012). They produce varieties of antimicrobial metabolites during the process of fermentation such as lactic acid, acetic acid, ethanol, hydrogen peroxide, diacetyl and others. (Diop et al., 2010). These metabolites produced confer preservative ability on them as a natural competitive means to overcome other microorganisms sharing the same niche (Oliveira et al., 2008). Nowadays consumers prefer food with few or no chemical preservatives. As a result, interests in LAB have increased over period because of their safe association with fermented foods which are consumed by humans. Attention has focused on the ability of LAB to produce proteinaceous substances known as bacteriocins that inhibit the growth of pathogens such as Listeria, Clostridium, Staphylococcus, Bacillus spp. and Enterococcus spp. Intensive study of bacteriocins produced by LAB are being carried out because of their antagonistic activities against food-borne bacteria. Bacteriocin producing strains of LAB may be of great significant in competing with other organisms in intestine. They are made up of a biologically active protein moiety which have a bactericidal mode of action and are specific while attaching to cell receptors. Lactic acid bacteria thus enhance food safety, improve organoleptic attributes, enrich nutrients and increases overall health benefits (Steele et al., 2013).

Most food spoilage meant for human consumption is caused by microorganisms. Fungi and bacteria when given access to foods that are unprotected rapidly increase in population, producing distasteful chemicals and toxins in some cases (Pitt and Hocking, 2009).  Due to the ubiquitous nature of microbes, they have such enormous populations, and are often dispersed as spores in air, water, or soil thereby they colonizing unprotected foods. Humans developed two main strategies in order to prevent microbial food spoilage; reducing  their access to the susceptible foodstuffs and  inhibiting growth thereby limiting population size by creating an unfavourable environment (Rawat, 2015). Both fermented and unfermented food products are known to be susceptible to spoilage during storage. Their spoilage during storage is said to be due to the presence of the spoilage microbes and the enzymes they produce, which breakdown the food/food product into entirely different substances leading to changes in their organoleptic properties (Fadahunsi et al., 2013). Although starter cultures have been widely used in some fermentation of foods to enforce uniformity in their composition, reduced shelf life still pose as a major problem. The consumption of products contaminated with spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms could serve as a potential health threat hence the need to control microbial contamination of foods.


1.2 PROBLEM STATEMENT

These days, consumers are concerned about foods preserved with chemical substance which may leave chemical residues in their bodies after consumption and cause adverse health effects when accumulated. However, they now rely on less processed foods which may harbour microorganisms which can cause food spoilage or food-borne diseases.

 

1.3 JUSTIFICATION

The solution to food preservation challenges can be the use of antimicrobial metabolites produced by microorganisms with the status generally recognized as safe (GRAS) of which lactic acid bacteria is one. Most researchers have reported the antimicrobial potential of lactic acid bacteria using their cell free supernatant/bacteriocin (Adebayo and Aderiye, 2007; Sharaf and Al Habi, 2011). This work focused on the evaluation of the strains that produce antimicrobial metabolites and have wide spectrum activity on food pathogens so they can be useful in food preservation in food industries.

1.4 GENERAL OBJECTIVE

To characterize strains of Lactic acid bacteria isolated from some fermented foods consumed in our localities and to evaluate their antimicrobial activity on some food spoilage microorganisms and food-borne pathogens.

            1.4.1        Specific objectives

1.      To isolate and identify phenotypically, biochemically and molecularly, Lactic acid bacteria from fermented cereals, namely; maize and sorghum.

2.      To determine the growth characteristics of the Lactic acid bacteria isolates in various conditions.

3.      To determine the antimicrobial activities of the LAB on some food spoilage microorganisms and food-borne pathogens using agar well diffusion and co-culturing method.

4.      To identify the organic acids apart from lactic acid produced by the strains using GC-MS analysis.

 

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment