ABSTRACT
This study investigates the role of gender in decision-making processes within the government of Dutse Local Government Area, with a particular focus on the representation and participation of women in leadership roles. Data were gathered from 50 respondents using a structured questionnaire that examined demographic information, perceptions of gender equality, barriers to women's participation, and strategies for addressing gender discrimination in governance. The findings reveal that gender significantly influences decision-making processes, with women often underrepresented in leadership positions. A majority of respondents perceive low levels of gender equality in government decision-making, citing cultural norms, societal biases, and institutional barriers as primary obstacles to women's participation. The study identifies various forms of gender discrimination, including unequal access to leadership positions, limited opportunities to voice opinions, and biases against women’s leadership capabilities. Respondents also highlighted the societal perception of traditional gender roles as a significant hindrance to achieving gender equality. These findings underline the need for comprehensive reforms to address both cultural and structural barriers that perpetuate gender disparities in governance. Despite these challenges, the respondents expressed strong support for initiatives aimed at fostering gender equality. Key recommendations include implementing policies that ensure equal representation of men and women in decision-making processes effect, conducting gender sensitivity training for government staff, and promoting mentorship programs for women in politics and administration. Public awareness campaigns were also suggested as a way to challenge societal stereotypes and promote the value of women’s contributions to governance. This study emphasizes the importance of achieving gender equality in governance, not only as a matter of fairness but also as a critical component of effective and inclusive decision-making. The underrepresentation of women in leadership roles limits the diversity of perspectives necessary for addressing complex societal challenges. Addressing this issue requires a coordinated effort from government institutions, civil society organizations, and the community at large. By implementing the recommended measures, the government of Dutse LGA can create a more inclusive governance system that reflects the diverse needs and aspirations of its population, thereby fostering social and economic progress for all.
.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page - - - - - - - - - - -i
Approval Page - - - - - - - - - - -ii
Declaration - - - - -- - - - - - -iii
Dedication - - - - - - - - - - -iv
Acknowledgements - - - - - - - - - -v
Table of Content - - - - - - - - - -vi
Abstract - - - - - - - - - - -viii
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study - - - - - - - - -1
1.2 Statement of the Problem - - - - - - - -2
1.3 Research Questions - - - - - - - - -3
1.4 Aim and Objectives of the Study - - - - - - -3
1.5 Significance of the Study - - - - - - - - -3
1.6 Scope of the Study - - - - - - - - -4
1.7 Limitation of the Study - - - - - - - - -4
1.8 History of the Area of Study - - - - - - - -4
1.9 Definition of the Terms - - - - - - - - -10
1.10 Plan of the Study - - - - - - - - - -10
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
2.0 Introduction - - - - - - - - - -12
2.1 Concept
Classification - - - - - - - - -12
2.2 Concept of Gender - - - - - - - - -13
2.3 Women in Decision-making - - - - - - - -18
2.4 Concept of Decision Making - - - - - - - -23
2.5 An overview of Gender Discrimination on Decision-making - - - -32
2.6 The Way Forward - - - - - - - - -33
2.7 Theoretical
Framework - - - - - - - - -35
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction - - - - - - - - - -38
3.2 Research Design - - - - - - - - - -38
3.3 Population of the Study - - - - - - - - -38
3.4 Sample Size - - - - - - - - - -39
3.5 Sampling Techniques - - - - - - - - -39
3.6 Method/Instrument of Data Collection - - - - - - -39
3.7 Method of Data Analysis - - - - - - - -40
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS
4.0 Introduction - - - - - - - - - -41
4.1 Demographic
Information of the Respondents - - - - - -41
4.2 Responses of the Respondents on Research
Questions - - - - -43
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Summary - - - - - - - - - - -48
5.2 Conclusion - - - - - - - - - -48
5.3 Recommendations - - - - - - - - -49
References - - - - - - - - - -51
Appendix (Questionnaire) - - - - - - - - -55
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Background to the study
Gender discrimination can have far-reaching consequences on
decision-making processes in various aspects of life, including personal,
social and professional settings. This assessment aims to examine the effect of
gender discrimination on decision making.
Gender discrimination is a persuasive issue that affects
individuals, communities and societies worldwide. It manifests in various
forms, including unequal access to education, employment, healthcare, and
decision-making opportunities. Decision-making a critical aspect of personal
and professional life, is not immune to the influences of gender
discrimination.
The struggle for gender equality dates back to the early 20th
century, with the women's suffrage movement. Since then, significant progress
has been made in promoting gender equality, including the adoption of
international conventions, national laws, and politicies. However, despite
these efforts, gender discrimination persists, affecting various aspects of
life, including decision-making.
There are functional responsibilities that are giving to men and
women by society and are influenced by the cultural, political, economic,
religious and social situation. It is worth nothing that where women and men
have equal conditions for realising their full human rights and potentials to
contribute to and benefit from development such society tends to develop
faster. Thus, taking in to account their similarities, differences and the
various roles they play, gender discrimination is often identified as a key
issue in economic development of emerging economies.
Women seem to be discriminated against in politics in Nigeria and
the few of them that get elected or appointed to political positions have so
much to contend with as it is believed to be the world of men. The number of
women who even dare contesting elections in Nigeria is minimal as politics here
is actually money politics, Many women are unable to afford the huge sum of
money that this requires along with the fact that the society sees women are
not being cut out for such in view of the nature of politics in Nigeria.
Gender discrimination is a multifaceted concept that incorporates
both opportunities and outcomes. This study aims to investigate the effect of
gender discrimination on decision-making in government, with a focus on
identifying the extent to which gender discrimination influences decision-making
outcomes, and exploring the underlying factors that contribute to these
discriminatory practices.
1.2 Statement of the problem
Assessment of the effects of gender discrimination on
decision-making in government are complex and multifaceted and can
multifaceted.
Promoting gender equality can be an economic game changer. The
IMF's latest economic review of Nigeria's economy says closing the gender gap
would mean higher growth and productivity greater economic stability. Women’s
equal participation in governance is, therefore, an important end in itself,
recognition of their right to speak and be heard. More broadly, it is a means
to social transformations. Decisions made and policies implemented by
governance institutions at global, national and local levels help to shape
perceptions of the roles that women and men play in society, as well as
determining their access to rights and resources. Involving women in defining
these policies and processes, and in influencing the institutions that produce them,
makes it more likely they will respond to the different needs and situations of both women and men,
and contribute to development.
However, poor systems of governance result in widespread
discrimination related to sex, race, colour, religion and political opinion.
Looking across the world, persistent and pervasive gender disparities continue
to exist. In Dutse local government area Jigawa state, women and men do not
have an equal level of political representation, freedom of association and
expression. Employment and career structures, public sector also favour men above
women. Service delivery systems are discriminating, and services are more
accessible to men than to women, although neither poor men nor poor women fare
well in respect. The society sees fare well in respect. women who go to
politics as ‘rebels’ and prostitutes; this attitude deters women from participating
in politics.
1.3 Research Questions
i.
What
are the effects of Gender discrimination on decision-making in Dutse L.G.A?
ii.
How
does gender discrimination affect women participation in decision-making
process in Dutse L.G.A?
iii.
What
are the public opinions on the effect of Gender discrimination in decision
making process in Dutse L.G.A?
iv.
What
are the factors that hinder women participation in decision making in Dutse
L.G.A?
1.4 Aim and Objectives of the Study
i.
To
assess the effects of gender discrimination on decision making in Dutse L.G.A.
ii.
To
identify the effects of gender discrimination on women participation in
decision making process in Dutse L.G.A.
iii.
To
analyse public opinion on the effect of gender discrimination in decision
making in Dutse L.G.A.
iv.
To
find out an appropriate solution to the problem.
1.5 Significance of the Study
Here are the Significance of this study:
i.
Improved
Decision-Making: By identifying the effects of gender discrimination on
decision-making, this study can inform strategies to promote more inclusive and
equitable decision-making processes.
ii.
Enhanced
Gender Equality: The findings of this study can contribute to the development
policies and programs aimed at promoting gender equality and women's
empowerment.
iii.
Better
Resource Allocation: By highlighting the impact of gender discrimination on
resource allocation, this study can inform more equitable distribution of
resources.
iv.
Contributing
to Existing Literature: This study contributes to the existing body of research
on gender discrimination and decision-making, providing new insights and
perspectives.
v.
Empowering
Women and Girls: The findings of this study can inform strategies to empower
women and girls, promoting their participation in decision-making processes.
1.6 Scope of the Study
The study will focus on government institutions at the national,
state or local level, depending on the research design and availability of
data. The study will examine the effect of gender the effect of gender
discrimination on decision-making in government over a specific period, such as
several years or decades. By defining the scope of the Study, researchers can
ensure that their investigation is focused, manageable, and relevant to the
research question.
1.7 Limitations of the Study
The study limits itself on effect of gender discrimination on
decision-making in government within Dutse local government area of Jigawa
state due to the time frame under which the research shall be completed.
Furthermore, the rationale behind the choice of Dutse local government as the
case study is primarily because it is the local government closer to the
researcher as such she is adequately familiar with the environment and absolute
source of collecting accurate and reliable data from the approved sources. The
researcher encountered some logistic problems in carrying out the research such
as finance, tax books, time distance from the place of collecting primary data
and lack of cooperation from the respondents as well as inadequate primary and
secondary data.
1.8 History of the Area of Study
Dutse is a city located in northern Nigeria. It is the capital city
of Jigawa State. It is home to Federal University. In addition to the Federal
University Dutse, there is also a Research Institute for Date Palm (Sub
Station) and state polytechnic in Dutse. The Jigawa State Polytechnic has its
College of Business and Management Studies at Dutse. With an estimated
population of 153,000 (2009), Dutse is currently the largest city in Jigawa
State followed by Hadejia (111,000), Gumel (43,000), and Birnin Kudu (27,000).
Dutse is the capital of Jigawa state of Nigeria. The state was created in 1991
during the military regime of General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida. Dutse
(Dutsi,in earlier notes) got its name from the rocky topography peculiar to the
area. Different forms of rocks can be seen widely spread across the town.
Mostly igneous in nature, the rocky town got its name from these naturally
endowed resources, Dutse (Hausa term for rock). Dutse and it environ are well
known for Date Trees (Dabino) of different variety. The area is characterised
with undulating topography and hilly walls.
Legend of the people speak of an early epoch of a great hunter
called [Duna-Magu] a Kanuri man who first discovered Dutse nicknamed [Gadawur]
as a rich hunting ground for gazelles [Gada in Hausa]. The settlement of Garu
which traditions claim pre-dated the arrival of Bagauda to Kano in the dying
years of the 1st millennium. The earliest written reference to Dutse is
reported in the famous Kano chronicle which mentioned its defeat by Sarkin Kano
[Abdullahi Burja C. 1438=1452], who was said to have followed up the defeat
with the marriage of a daughter of the Sarkin Dutse alongside the daughters of
his Galadima. The earliest written reports indicated that by the opening years
of 18th century, Dutse had grown into a very big town comprising of about
seventy wards within its walled vicinity. The wall, which was built around the
rock clusters, enclosing [Jambo stream] within the central area, hand twelve
city gates [Kofofin Gari] named after the nearest wards:
Although the wall does not stand now, remnants of it are still
visible in some areas:
1. Kofar Maranjuwa
2. Kofar Burtulan
3. Kofar Yina
4. Kofar Kukiya
5. Kofar Bukka
6. Kofar Galamawa
7. Kofar Ma’ai
8. Kofar Tago
9. Kofar Kachi
10.Kofar Gadadin
11.Kofar Galadimawa
12.Kofar Rariya
The years between 1732-1735 in Dutse’s annals were dominated by a
powerful figure of Fulani descent called Ada who came to the area as a military
envoy of Sarkin Kano Kumbari, sent on a mission in 1732 to put a stop to the
slave raiding forays of Sarkin Dutse [Makuri] in to Kano area. However, no sooner
had Ada defeated Sarkin Dutse [Makuri] events took an unexpected twist as he
not only usurped the ruler-ship of Dutse but also asserted his independence and
further proceeded with re-organization of a strong military force to rival
Kano. Little wonder within two years he not only annexed territories from
Aujara, Birnin-Kudu, Kiyawa, and Ringim; but also repulsed several expeditions
mounted against him by his erstwhile boss. The period of Ada marked Dutse’s
pinnacle of zenith and glory. It is said of Ada that by c. 1735 all Kano
warriors were reluctant to answer further Kumbari’s call for expedition against
him. This development left Kumabri at the mercy of some 99 Kano princes who
only on exacting a heavy concession agreed to come to his aid. The princes set
out on their mission to capture Ada, by dressing eunuch impressively in royal
regalia as to deceitfully appear as Sarkin Kano kumbari. In the course of the
encounter that ensured, Ada who mistakenly went in pursuit of Sarkin Kano
[Kumbari] found himself facing a decoy surrounded by the prices. Even at that
point Ada rather than surrender opted to fight to his last breath. The gallant
combat fighter he was, Ada only gave up the ghost after killing four of the
Princes namely:-Dan Buram, Dan Lawan, Dan Maje and Dan Isa. Interestingly
however, this victory was not followed up with a march into the walled town
with a view to seizing its control for as Kano chronicle reports the ruler of
Kano was prevailed upon by his advisers not to dare make the attempt but to
return home immediately.[Tsohon Mutum] an erstwhile army commander and great
strategist under Sarkin Dutse [Makuri] filled the vacuum left by Ada’s death.
The most remarkable achievement of which Dutse tradition best remember him was
the building of [Ganuwar Garu] additional wall surrounding Garu palace town
with its only one gate [Kofar Garu]. This wall, which still visible in many
areas around the town was built with a mixture of special mortar and lumps of
stones, making the town of Garu in-axcessable to invaders except through the
only one highly fortified gate. The additional wall around the hilltop create a
castle like fortification within an already walled town. Sarkin Dutse [Tsohon
Mutum] Retired on the admonishment of his Queen named Yar-Gyatuma after 60
years on the throne C1737-1797 and was followed in succession by his two sons
Natata C1797-1799 and Gwajabo C1797-1806. Sarkin Dutse Gwajabo was over thrown
by [Salihi and Musa] the Jihadist Revolutionaries who captured Dutse in 1806.
The Ascendancy Of The Fulani In 1803
Unanimous Dutse traditions relate about Salihi and Musa of
[Yalligawa and Jalligawa] Fulani clans respectively as the principle actors who
led the movement that ushered in the ascendancy of Fulani rule in 1806. It
appears that the duo as the head of their clans generally referred to as [
Fulata-Borno] migrated to what is now refered to as Dutse Gadawur from Birnin
Gazargamo in Kanem- Borno Empire [Now in Yobe State] in 1801. These Fulani
clans were better known as [Fellata] or [Fulbe]. They have been occupying the
western part of the empire since the 16th century as a fertile grazing ground
for their Livestock. They remained distinct and refusing either to be
assimilated by the Kanuri majority nor participate politically in the government
in Gazargamo, but have always paid local taxes, and grazing dues to the central
government and local leaders in whose territories they resided. By the 18th
century, mainly as a result of the weakening of the central government, the
Fellata began to bear most of the hardship. Some scholars among them including
Salihi and Musa began to criticize the government through preaching the virtues
of good governance thereby pitching them against the government. In 1801, the
two clans [Jalligawa and Yalligawa] were forced to migrate to what is now Dutse
Gadawur, where political climate was much better. Here they have an opportunity
to establish themselves as political leaders cum Islamic scholars by wining the
hearts of the native people. Five years later, over threw the government of the
Hausa ruler [Sarkin Dutse Gwajabo] in 1806 after answering the call of Othman
bin Fodio, a man dubbed “the deliverer of the truth” They left for Zamfara in
the company of Malam Sulemanu where a meeting to select a leader for the Fulani
in Kano was called by Shehu Bin Fodiyo. Due to some reasons Shehu could not
attend the meeting but was represented by Muhammad Bello, with the instruction
to appoint Mallam Suleman as [the first Fulani ruler of Kano]. On their return
from Zamfara they settled briefly in Marmara quarters in Kano city assisting
[Sarkin Kano Suleman] in setting up an administration and the preparation for
the final assault against the last Hausa King Alwali in 1806. In mid 1807, they
seek Sulemanu’s permission to return to Dutse after the final assault at
Burunburun. On their return to Dutse, [Sarkin Dutse Gwajabo] could not match
their war skill, nor has he the capacity to challenge their control of over the
people already in the mood for change. Sarkin Dutse [Gwajabo}on assessing the
political atmosphere, relinquish power without a fight to the clans after
negotiating his retirement. He retired until his death on a hill called
[Jigawar Sarki] in Dutse metropolis. Defeat of EL-Kanemi forces In 1827, barely
twenty six year after their migration, the El-Kanemi in an effort to re-capture
their lost territories from the Sokoto caliphate came face to face with Sarkin
Dutse Musa’s forces. Musa a war strategist hid his forces on the edge of river
Kiyawa at a village that is now called FAKE a Hausa ward denoting hiding. He
used his knowledge [as a Fellata] of the Kanem war strategies against them as
he led his forces in an ambush when they least expected and caught them off-
guard. The El- Kanemi forces had to flee in utter confusion back to Borno
abandoning some of their possessions along the way through Guddiri territory
[now Katagum]. It is as a result of this defeat, subsequent Dutse rulers were
referred to as {Mai Barnawa} meaning chief of Kanuri as derogatory remark in a
joking relationship between the Fellata and the Kanuri their former hosts and
rulers.
JALLIGAWA AND YALLIGAWA [CLAN DUTSE RULERS]
Salihi dan Awwal - C1807-1819
Musa dan Ahmadu - C1819-1840
Bello dan Musa - C1840-1849
Suleiman dan Musa - C1849-1868
Ibrahim I dan Salihi - C1868-1884
Abdulkadir I dan Salihi - C1884-1893
Salihi dan Ibrahim - C1893-1894
brahim II dan Musa - C1894-1894
Abdulkadir II dan Musa - C1894-1901
Abdulkadir III dan Ibrahim - C1901-1903
Haladu dan Sulemanu - C1903-1910
Halilu dan Bello - C1910-1911
Hamida dan Ibrahim - C1912-1912
Abdullahi 1 dan Sulemanu - C1912-1919
Bello II dan Abdulkadir - C1919-1923
Suleiman II dan Nuhu - C1923-1960
Abdullahi Maikano Sulemanu - C1960-1983
Mohammadu Sunusi dan Bello - C1983-1995
Nuhu Muhammad Sanusi - C1995-2023
Muhammad Hamim Nuhu Sanusi - C2023-date.
It is significant to highlight that the ascendancy of Fulani in
C1807 marks a turning point in the history of Dutse as it lost its independence
and became submerged into Kano, as the clan leaders opted to recognize Sarkin
Kano Sulaiman as their spiritual leader. In return however, Kano conceded a
certain degree of autonomy to Dutse particularly in the sphere of Local
administration. For instance the two ruling clans of Jalligawa and Yalligawa
were reserved the exclusive right of producing successive Dutse rulers, while
Kano’s role remained limited to confirmation and installation of nominated
candidates for ruler ship. Such was the nature of the relationship between the
two until the British conquest of Kano in 1903 and the subsequent
administrative reforms introduced by the imperial power. The reforms
fundamentally eroded the autonomy of Dutse and placed it under the introduced
district head system as the new system of local administration all over
Northern Region [including Kano Emirate]. Territories all across the emirate
were re-grouped in to consolidated district areas. The then Sarkin Dutse
[Haladu] was reverted to a salaried district head charged primarily with the
responsibility of tax collection under the new dispensation. He later became
the first victim of the new system as he was removed in 1910 for failing to
collect adequate taxes. However, the exclusive hereditary right of the two
ruling houses in Dutse was preserved after some attempts to change the
arrangement.
1.9 Definition of the key terms
Assessment: Assessment
refers to the systematic evaluation or appraisal of the impact, effectiveness,
or quality of something. In this study, assessment refers to the evaluation of
the effect of gender discrimination on decision-making in government.
Effect: Effect refers
to the outcome, consequences, or result of a particular action, event, or
phenomenon. In this study, effect refers to the impact or consequence of gender
discrimination on decision-making in government.
Gender: Gender refers to the
socially constructed roles, behaviors, expectations, and norms that societies
assign to individuals based on their perceived biological sex (male or female).
It encompasses a wide range of identities and expressions that go beyond
biological differences, reflecting cultural, social, and psychological aspects
of being male, female, or non-binary.
Discrimination: Discrimination is
the unjust or prejudicial treatment of individuals or groups based on specific
characteristics such as race, gender, age, religion, disability, sexual
orientation, or socioeconomic status. It involves actions or policies that
result in unequal opportunities, privileges, or rights, often leading to
exclusion, marginalization, or disadvantage for the affected individuals or
groups.
Gender Discrimination:
Gender discrimination refers to the unfair or prejudicial treatment of
individuals based on their gender, which can result in unequal access to
resources, opportunities, and services. Gender discrimination can take many
forms.
Decision Making:
Decision making refers to the process of selecting a course of action from
available alternatives. In government decision-making involves policymakers,
bureaucrats, and other stakeholders working together to develop, implement, and
evaluate policies and programs.
1.10 Plan of the Study
This project is structure and outline in five chapters: Chapter one
deal with general introduction, background to the study, statement of the
problems, research questions, objectives of the studies, significance of the
study, scope and limitations of the study, background of the study area,
operational definition of key terms and Plan of the study.
While chapter two consists of literature review of the project.
Here it began with introduction of the chapter conceptual clarifications,
concept of gender, gender inequality in public sector, effects of gender
discrimination on decision-making, problems of gender discrimination, women in
decision-making, roles of women in decision-making, problems of decision making
on gender discrimination in Nigeria, concept of decision making, importance of
decision making, challenges of decision making on gender inequality in public
sector, decision making model, an overview of gender discrimination on
decision-making, the way forward, theoretical framework, choice one theory.
While chapter three consists of research methodology, introduction,
research design, population of the study, sample size, sampling techniques,
methods of data collection, method of data analysis.
while chapter four consist of Data presentation and analysis,
introduction, demographic data of the respondent, response presentation and
analysis, while chapter five consist of summary, conclusion, recommendation,
bibliography, appendix (questionnaire design)
Login To Comment