ACCESSIBILITY AND UTILIZATION OF POST-HARVEST TECHNOLOGY INFORMATION BY WOMEN FOR EFFECTIVE AGRO-BASED ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN ABIA STATE, NIGERIA

  • 0 Review(s)

Product Category: Projects

Product Code: 00007047

No of Pages: 168

No of Chapters: 1-5

File Format: Microsoft Word

Price :

₦5000

  • $

ABSTRACT


The researcher assessed the accessibility and utilization of Post-Harvest Technology (PHT) information by women for effective Agro-based Entrepreneurship in Abia State, Nigeria. This study was, therefore, conducted in Abia State to: identify the PHT information needs of the Women Agro-based Entrepreneurs (WAE); find the extent of awareness of PHT information by these WAE; ascertain the extent of accessibility and utilization of PHT information by the WAE; find out the PHT information sources accessed and utilized by the WAE; highlight  the PHT information preferred by the WAE and proffer suggestions for improving accessibility of PHT to the women for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in the study area. Data were collected from a sample of 264 women respondents from a population of 2,358 registered WAE in the state with the aid of a well-structured questionnaire. The collected data were analysed with relevant descriptive and inferential statistics. The results showed that both the younger aged (20-45 years) and older aged (≥ 46 years) women agro-based entrepreneurs in the state have the same PHT information needs with no significant difference  (P ≥ 0.05) in all the mean responses of the two groups of women after hypotheses testing. The recorded high extent of awareness of PHT information amongst these women came from internet, information officers, extension agents, family members and peers with the awareness of PHT information from community libraries and reading of books rated low. Though the WAE generally had substantial access to different types of PHT information, the highly utilized ones were those on consumer choice, food packaging, storage of agricultural products, handling of agricultural produce, post-harvest loss prevention and preservation of harvested crops while the ones that had low extent of utilization included: value addition/ processing, quality standards, commodity distribution, marketing regulations and PHT credit facilities. The preferred PHT information sources by the WAE in the study area include: radio, television, mobile phones, social media, family members, colleagues, information officers, extension agents, internet, group meetings and research annual technical reports. The respondents in the study area generally agreed that the use of the local language in the delivery of PHT information, establishment of more community libraries and information centres, regular visits by extension agents, regular training workshops and more radio and television programmes and/or channels dedicated to PHT information would improve the accessibility and utilization of PHT information by WAE in the state. Finally, it is recommended that librarians and information scientists should not only collaborate with other professionals and stakeholders (governmental and non-governmental) to provide relevant material assistance to WAE but should also repackage PHT information in the forms that will enhance their accessibility and utilization by the WAE for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State and areas with similar culture and agro ecology.





TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title page                                                                                                        i

Declaration                                                                                                      ii

Certification                                                                                                    iii

Dedication                                                                                                      iv

Acknowledgements                                                                                        v

Table of Contents                                                                                           vi        

List of Tables                                                                                                  ix

List of Figures                                                                                                                             xi

Abstract                                                                                                          xii

 

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1       Background of the Study                                                                   1

1.2       Statement of the Problem                                                                   6

1.3       Purpose of the Study                                                                          7

1.4.      Research Questions                                                                             8

1.5       Hypotheses                                                                                         10

1.6       Significance of Study                                                                         11

1.7       Scope of the Study                                                                             13

 

CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1       Conceptual Framework                                                                       14

2.1.1.   Concept of accessibility                                                                      15

2.1.2    Concept of utilization                                                                         17

2.1.3.   Concept of entrepreneurship                                                               19

2.1.3.1 Concept of agro-based entrepreneurship                                            20

2.1.4    Concept of women                                                                             22

2.1.4.1 Concept of women agro-based entrepreneurs (WAE)                        23

2.1.5 Concept of post- harvest technology (PHT)                                          24

2.1.6 Concept of PHT information                                                                 27

2.1.6.1 PHT information needs of women agro-based entrepreneurs

(WAE)                                                                                                30

2.1.7 Sources of PHT information                                                                  31

2.1.7.1 Extension agents                                                                                 33

2.1.7.2 Information officer and public relations officer                                 36

2.1.7.3 Mobile phones and social media                                                         37

2.1.7.4 Community libraries                                                                            39

2.1.7.5 Radio and television                                                                           40

2.1.7.6 People                                                                                                 42

2.1.7.7 Miscellaneous sources                                                             42

2.1.7.8 Information provider                                                                          43

2.1.9   Conceptual model                                                                                44

2.2     Theoretical Framework                                                                         47

2.2.1. Theory of change (ToC)                                                                        47

2.2.2. The Donabedian theory of 1966                                                           48

2.3 Review of Empirical Studies                                                                    49

2.4. Summary of Literature Review                                                               57

 

CHAPTER 3:  METHODOLOGY

3.1.      Design of the Study                                                                            59

3.2.      Area of the Study                                                                               60

3.3.      Population of the Study                                                                      64

3.4.      Sample and Sampling Techniques                                                      64

3.5.      Instrument for Data Collection                                                           66

3.6.      Validation of the Instrument                                                              67

3.7.      Reliability of the Instrument                                                               67

3.8.      Method of Data Collection                                                                 68

3.9.      Method of Data Analysis                                                                   69       

CHAPTER 4: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1.      Results                                                                                                71

4.2.      Major Findings of the Study                                                              93

4.3.      Discussion                                                                                           98

 

CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1       Summary                                                                                             107

5.2       Conclusion                                                                                          113

5.3       Recommendations                                                                              116

5.4.      Implication of the Study                                                                     118

5.5.      Limitations of the Study                                                                     119

5.6.      Suggestions for Further Studies                                                         119

           References                                                                                          120

          Appendices                                                                                          133                                                                                                                                                                                                 






 

LIST OF TABLES


 4.01:               Mean responses of younger and older WAE on the PHT

Information needs for effective agro-based entrepreneurship            71

 4.02:               t-test analysis of the mean responses of younger and older

WAE on PHT information needs for effective

agro-based entrepreneurship                                                               72

 4.03:               Mean Responses of younger and older WAE on the extent of

awareness of PHT information by WAE in Abia State                      74

 4.04:               t-test analysis of the mean responses of younger and older WAE

on the extent of awareness of PHT information for effective

agro-based entrepreneurship                                                              75

 4.05              Mean responses of younger and older WAE on the

extent of PHT information accessible to WAE for effective

agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State                                         77

 4.06:               t-test analysis of the mean responses of younger and older WAE

on the  extent of accessibility of PHT information for effective

agro-based entrepreneurship                                                              78

 4.07:              Mean responses of younger and older WAE on the

extent of PHT information utilized by WAE for effective

agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State                                         79

 4.08:               t-test analysis of the mean responses of younger and older WAE

on the  extent of utilization of PHT information for effective

agro-based entrepreneurship                                                              80

 4.09:               Mean responses of younger and older WAE on the

sources of PHT information accessed by WAE for effective

agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State                                         81

 4.10:               t-test analysis of the mean responses of younger and older WAE

on PHT information sources accessed for effective

agro-based entrepreneurship                                                              83

 4.11:              Mean responses of younger and older WAE on the

sources of PHT information utilized by WAE for effective

agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State                                         84

 4.12:               t-test analysis of the mean responses of younger and older WAE

on PHT information sources utilized for effective

agro-based entrepreneurship                                                              85

 4.13:              Mean responses of younger and older WAE on the

sources of PHT information preferred by WAE for effective

agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State                                         86

 4.14:               t-test analysis of the mean responses of younger and older WAE

on sources of PHT information preferred for effective

agro-based entrepreneurship                                                             87

 4.15:              Mean responses of younger and older WAE on the factors that

influence the accessibility of PHT information by WAE

for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State                    88

 4.16:              t-test analysis of the mean responses of younger and older WAE

on the factors that influence accessibility of PHT information

for effective agro-based entrepreneurship                                          89

 4.17:               Mean responses of younger and older WAE on the factors that

influence the utilization of PHT information by WAE for

effective agro-based entrepreneurship                                                90

 4.18:               t-test analysis of the mean responses of younger and older WAE

on the factors that influence utilization of PHT information

for effective agro-based entrepreneurship                                          91

 4.19:               Mean responses of younger and older WAE on the ways of improving accessibility and utilization of PHT information among WAE

for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State                    92

           

 






 

LIST OF FIGURES

 1:                    Conceptual model for accessibility and utilization of PHT

information                                                                                         46

 2:                    Map of Abia State indicating the three Senatorial

Zones and seventeen Local Government Areas                                 63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION


1.1       BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Prompt access to and utilization of improved Post-Harvest Technology (PHT) information has the potential of enhancing the productivity of Women in Agro-based Entrepreneurship (WAE) in Abia State, Nigeria for sustainable food security and effective business performances. According to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, about one-third of all food produced in the world is lost or wasted. In vastly food-insecure areas such as Sub-Saharan Africa, about52% of fruits and vegetables,44% of roots and tubers, and 20% of all grains are lost between harvest and consumption. There is also substantial degradation in nutritive content, quality, associated incomes, reduced financial value, and public health. Given this precarious situation and an expected world population increase from 7.6 to 9.8 billion by 2050, rapid resource depletion and a changing climate, food and post-harvest loss reduction need to be at the centre of strategies for sustainable development. As the global community strives to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of eliminating poverty and hunger by 2030, improved post-harvest technology (PHT) has the potential to eliminate loss of food and nutrition requirements of 48 million people in Sub-Saharan Africa, the region most at risk of food and nutrition insecurity (FAO, 2017).

In agriculture, PHT is about the practices that are applied to agricultural commodities between harvest and consumption in order to prevent post-harvest losses, control the quality, process and increase value to the agricultural products to meet the consumers’ food and nutritional requirements. According to Ukpabi & Nwosu, (2013), PHT stimulates agricultural production by preventing post-harvest losses, improves nutrition, adds value to agricultural commodities, opens new marketing opportunities and generates new jobs. PHT is aimed at keeping commodities in an acceptable state from harvest until it reaches the consumers since many agricultural commodities are transported in their perishable state. It is also aimed at minimizing losses at the least possible cost.

In Nigeria, efforts are made by the government of the federation to revive the agricultural sector in line with the SDGs of United Nations. Some of these efforts are evident in the initiation of advanced scientific research approaches for the production of improved varieties of agricultural commodities, PHTs, agricultural information transfer and substantial employment for her teaming men and women. Women comprise nearly half of the world’s workforce and supply the main financial support for 30 percent of the world’s homes (Al-Hadad, 2015) mainly through growing of crops, post-harvest value addition and marketing. Women make essential contributions to agriculture and allied activities in developing countries, but their roles differ significantly by region and are changing rapidly in some areas (Babu et al., 2014). Accordingto Nwosu et al. (2014), women are adult female persons.  In most cases, women in agro-based entrepreneurship (WAE) differ in their information needs and in their access to and utilization of available post-harvest technology (PHT) information from extension service and other sources. Such diversity among WAE could be related to various personal, social, economic, or institutional factors.

Understanding the reasons behind such diversity, their information needs, and WAE’s current level of access and utilization of PHT information is of paramount importance. Women in entrepreneurship have been mainly neglected both in society and in the social sciences (Singh and Sharma, 2011). Entrepreneurship development among women aids to increase their decision making status in the family and society as a whole, and also enhances theirpersonal capabilities (Prabha, 2009 and Guillén, 2013). Agro-based entrepreneurship involves the micro, medium and large scale production and selling of agricultural produces in the hope of making profit.

Oladele (1999)opines that the efficiency of technologies produced and disseminated rests oneffective communication which is the vital process of information dissemination.  Ayanyemi (2006), Bates (2012) and Adio et al. (2016) describe information as a vital resource for individual growth and for reducing the user’s level of uncertainty. Bitso (2012) describes information source as the medium by which information is stored or conveyed.  PHT information is the message or part of agricultural information that is concerned with the knowledge about how to preserve, conserve, store, add value, control quality, process and reduce loss of agricultural commodities. PHT information is meant to enhance the business performances of women in agro-based entrepreneurship. PHT Information Sources are the channels and or containers that possess information about the science and technology that are applied to agricultural produce from harvest to consumption: for preservation, conservation, processing, storage , value addition, quality control and utilisation for meeting consumers food and nutritional needs. These PHT Information Sources include libraries, information officers, extension agents, mass media, family members, friends and group meetings.

Access and use of existing PHT information are considered key elements of advanced agriculture system in addition to being the fundamental and salient promoters for agricultural development throughout the states of Nigeria which include Abia State. Accessibility to PHT information by women is receiving messages related to post-harvest activities from different sources and extension methods such as mass media, extension service (advisory service, orientation about seasonal activities information, training, field days, demonstration, visits), on-farm research, including its frequency while, utilization of post-harvest technology information refers to the use or converting into action the accessed and understood post-harvest technology messages to perform their agricultural businesses.

According to Litman (2017), accessibility (or just access) refers to the simplicity of reaching goods, services, activities, information and endpoints, which collectively are called opportunities. He further defines accessibility as the would-be for interaction and exchange. Ugah (2008) attributesaccess to information source to the ability of the information users to identify available information sources and use the sources. The proper identification and utilization of appropriate PHT information is sine qua non to the effective planning and decision making in agro-based entrepreneurship. According to Emasaelu, (2014), utilization refers to the application and adequate use of information resources   identified and acquired by consumer to solve problem and make decision.  Unfortunately, many women in agri-businesses in Sub-Saharan Africa rely on indigenous knowledge as source of information and this local knowledge has not adequately helped to prevent post-harvest losses and add value to agricultural produce. Proper utilization of improved PHT information by the women agro-based entrepreneurs in Abia State has the potential of increasing their effectiveness in value addition to agricultural commodities, minimizing the post-harvest losses of agricultural produce and handling quality assurance of agricultural products.

Therefore, as new PHT Information from different information sources (electronic, prints and other sources) emerge, it is wise to survey and assess how effectively the information is accessed and utilized by those that need them, particularly the Women in Agro-based Entrepreneurship (WAE) in Abia State. WAE can play a substantial role by their effective and proficient involvement in entrepreneurial activities. They have basic local skill, knowledge, potential and resources to create and manage enterprises. In line with Singh and Sharma (2011), entrepreneurship is a force that mobilises other assets to sufficiently supply vast market demands and the capacity to produce something from practically nothing by means of creating value through pulling together a unique bundle of resources to exploit an opportunity.

Women can be given relevant information to enhance their managerial skills since many have the “spirit” of entrepreneurship (Kahan, 2013) as entrepreneurship involves profit making through organized businesses (Ikeme, 2012).Women agri- entrepreneurs as defined by Vijayakumar and Naresh (2013) are those women who take the lead in organized agricultural business (or industry) that provide employment for others. These women are confident, innovative, creative and able to achieve self-economic liberation in collaboration or individually. They create opportunities of employment for others through initiating, establishing and growing the enterprise by keeping pace with their social, family and personal lives (Mayilvangnan and Santhum, 2015). Therefore, for the aim of this study, Women in Agro-based Entrepreneurship (WAE) can be considered to be women who are between twenty years of age and above and are involved in micro, medium and large scale agricultural and allied businesses in the hope of making profit. These businesses range from the production to the post-harvest stages of agro-based entrepreneurship. In this study also, younger WAE refer to women in agro-based entrepreneurship who are 45 years and below while the older WAE refer to women in agro-based entrepreneurship who are 46 years and above. 

Therefore, this study while ascertaining the accessibility and utilization of PHT information by women for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State, will attempt to identify the PHT information needs, the extent of awareness of PHT information sources, PHT information source preference, factors that sway the access and use of the PHT information sources and provide useful policy recommendations for effective information service delivery to WAE.The content of the findings of this study therefore would revolve around the independent variable, accessibility and utilization of PHT information by younger and older WAE and effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State as the dependent variable.


1.2       STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

The substantial decrease in food quality, reduced financial value and heavy losses of agricultural produce after bumper harvests in an era when agricultural research scientists have conceived improved post-harvest technologies that ought to address these problems is distressing. While much post-harvest technology (PHT) information are made available by these research scientists and other information providers through different information sources, the need for their access and use by the prevalent women agro-based entrepreneurs in Abia State in particular for proper integration into their agro-based entrepreneurship is essential.

The effect of not accessing and using the PHT information by these women could cause poor planning and wrong decision making in their agri businesses. It could also contribute to the inconsistent product quality and supply, loss of agricultural commodities and inadequate intermediaries to develop relationship between vendors, purchasers and any other value chain partners. The women agro-based entrepreneurs in Abia State are devastatingly using only indigenous knowledge in their agro-based entrepreneurship instead of the improved post-harvest technologies.

Though, some authors, Amaechi & Oyemike (2015), Gebre-Selassie (2001), Umali (1994), Daudu et al. (2009), Odini (2014) and Adetimehin et al.(2018)  have dealt with agricultural information, none of these studies specifically addressed accessibility and utilization of PHT information by Abia State women agro-based entrepreneurs for effective agro-based  entrepreneurship.  Therefore, this study is set to investigate the accessibility and utilization of PHT information by women for effective agro-biased entrepreneurship in Abia State, Nigeria.


1.3       PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The purpose of this study is to ascertain the accessibility and utilization of Post-Harvest Technology (PHT) information by Women for effective Agro-based Entrepreneurship in Abia State, Nigeria.

Specifically, the objectives of this study are to:

i)                     identify the PHT information needs of  younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State ;

ii)                  examine the extent of awareness of PHT information by younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years)  WAE for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State;

iii)                ascertain  the extent of accessibility of PHT information to younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years)  WAE for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State;

iv)                ascertain the extent of utilization of PHT information by younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years)  WAE for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State;

v)                  find out the PHT information sources accessed by younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years)  WAE for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State;

vi)                find out the PHT information sources utilized by younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years)  WAE for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State;

vii)              highlight  the PHT information sources preferred by younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years)  WAE for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State;

viii)            identify the factors that influence the accessibility of PHT information to younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE  for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State;

ix)                determine the factors that influence the utilization of PHT Information  by younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years)  WAE for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State; and

x)                  proffer ways of improving accessibilityand utilization of PHT            information among younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years)  WAE for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State.


1.4       RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The following research questions (RQ) would be answered:

i)                    What are the PHT information needs of younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE for effective agro-based Entrepreneurship in Abia State?

ii)                  What is the extent of awareness of PHT information by younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State?

iii)                To what extent is the PHT information accessible to younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State?

iv)                To what extent is the accessed PHT information utilized by younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State?

v)                  What are the sources of PHT information accessed by younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State?

vi)                What are the sources of PHT information utilized by younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State?

vii)              What are the sources of PHT information preferred by younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State?

viii)            What are the factors that influence the accessibility of PHT information by younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State?

ix)                What are the factors that influence the utilization of PHT information by younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State?

x)                  What are the ways of improving accessibility and utilization of PHT            information among younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State?


            1.5.            HYPOTHESES

The succeeding hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of significance.

HO1:    There is no significant difference between the mean responses of younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE on PHT information needs for effective agro-based Entrepreneurship in Abia State;

HO2:    There is no significant difference between the mean responses of younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE on the extent of awareness of PHT information for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State;

HO3:    There is no significant difference between the mean responses of younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE on the extent of accessibility to PHT information for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State;

HO4:    There is no significant difference between the mean responses of younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE on the extent of utilization of PHT information for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State;

HO5:    There is no significant difference between the mean responses of younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE on the PHT information sources accessed for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State;

HO6:    There is no significant difference between the mean responses of younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE on the PHT information sources utilized for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State;

HO7:    There is no significant difference between the mean responses of younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE on the sources of PHT information preferred for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State;

HO8:    There is no significant difference between the mean responses of younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE on the factors that influence the accessibility to PHT information for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State;

HO9: There is no significant difference between the mean responses of younger (20- 45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAE on the factors that influence the utilization of PHT information for effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State.


1.6.            SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY

To bring about national food security, effective entrepreneurship and quality assurance in agricultural sector, accessibility and utilization of PHT information sources can play decisive role. The findings from this study therefore, would enrich the body of knowledge and literature in PHT information sourcesand would also be beneficial to the government in its food security programmes. It would as well be very useful to librarians, agricultural research scientists and information scientists, agricultural entrepreneurs, and the general public.

One of the roles of government is the provision of information to increase efficiency and enhance the growth of the economy. Through the findings of this study, the government would be provided with meaningful intervention suggestions that would enable her make effective and implementable policies and follow-up in food security and national development. Though information is also provided by members of the private sector, the findings of this study will enable the government to identify where investment in public information is most effective.

This study should reveal networks of PHT information and, in particular, the sources of information available and which sources are preferred and utilized by the users of PHT information. The agricultural research scientists and information scientists would benefit from the findings of this study. The findings will help them to be conscious of the preferred information sources so as to know how to package and repackage information for optimal access and use. Also, through the findings of this study, the research scientists and other information providers, who work tirelessly for the provision of new improved technologies would understand the preferred sources of information by the supposed users of these information and more appropriately direct their efforts in making available the information through the sources that would be appreciated, accessed, understood and utilized by the users of PHT information. 

Farming and its allied businesses are knowledge-intensive industry. Though, both the public and private institutions have been supplying farmers and other stakeholders with information, inadequacies in the agricultural information system, such as the inability to consistently provide accurate, timely and easily accessible information present several challenges to farmers and agro-based entrepreneurs. The farmers and agro-based entrepreneurs need to obtain and use financial, technical and regulatory information as well as information on value addition and quality control to be able to manage their farms and create worth to their agricultural produce for optimal production, marketing, distribution and subsequent quality consumption. Therefore, this study would avail the agro-based entrepreneurs the opportunity to express their opinions on the factors that inhibit their desired access and use of post-harvest technology information sources and also make possible suggestions that may help improve effective service delivery by the PHT information providers.

Identifying the available  PHT information and making a concrete assessment on their accessibility and utilization by women for effective agro-based entrepreneurship would in no little measure assist the agricultural research scientists, entrepreneurs, library, information  and agricultural extension service providers and other stakeholders on upgraded techniques to package, repackage and communicate relevant PHT information to the women in agro-based entrepreneurship for improved food safety and economic growth throughout the State. With the well-documented result of this study, government and non-government agencies should give planning strategies and policies that would be effective in the dissemination of information on agro-based support and new technologies to the women in agricultural businesses.


1.7.            SCOPE OF THE STUDY

This study primarily ascertains the extent of accessibility and utilization of Post-Harvest Technology (PHT) information by younger (20 -45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) WAEfor effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State. The study coversAbia State Senatorial Zones which are, Abia North Senatorial Zone, Abia Central Senatorial Zone and Abia South Senatorial Zones. The study was carried out in the year 2018 with younger (20-45 years) and older (≥ 46 years) women in agro-based entrepreneurship drawn from across Abia State. The content of the findings of this study therefore revolved around the independent variable, accessibility and utilization of PHT information by WAE and effective agro-based entrepreneurship in Abia State as the dependent variable.     

Click “DOWNLOAD NOW” below to get the complete Projects

FOR QUICK HELP CHAT WITH US NOW!

+(234) 0814 780 1594

Buyers has the right to create dispute within seven (7) days of purchase for 100% refund request when you experience issue with the file received. 

Dispute can only be created when you receive a corrupt file, a wrong file or irregularities in the table of contents and content of the file you received. 

ProjectShelve.com shall either provide the appropriate file within 48hrs or send refund excluding your bank transaction charges. Term and Conditions are applied.

Buyers are expected to confirm that the material you are paying for is available on our website ProjectShelve.com and you have selected the right material, you have also gone through the preliminary pages and it interests you before payment. DO NOT MAKE BANK PAYMENT IF YOUR TOPIC IS NOT ON THE WEBSITE.

In case of payment for a material not available on ProjectShelve.com, the management of ProjectShelve.com has the right to keep your money until you send a topic that is available on our website within 48 hours.

You cannot change topic after receiving material of the topic you ordered and paid for.

Ratings & Reviews

0.0

No Review Found.


To Review


To Comment